HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments CAO 5/13/2002
~h SUMMERS ~-Sa;ah: I b,!Y(;l_r~' 'Jd theS-5WPPUr2(02):_A ll1~xiW(;lof.\!)lftlng facts and good policy. Tb~.9~e1-j
From: LEAHY Joe (HL)
To: SUMMERS Sarah
Date: 5/13/027:42AM
Subject: Sarah, I have reviewed the SDWPPU (2002), A mixture of interesting facts and good
policy, The ques
Sarah, I have reviewed the SDWPPU (2002). A mixture of interesting facts and good policy, The '
question i have relates to effect. What will be different after passage? What could a property owner do
before passage that he or she cannot do after passage? Specifically? The Plan expands the "protection,
area" to include the "entire MFWR and its "perenniai tributaries" for a distance of 28 miles upstream from
SUBs intake, all "entirely outside of Springfield UGB", What does that mean? What is the 1000 yard
setback? Is the County also adopting this Plan? Again what teeth does the Plan have? Do we have a
Measure 56 requirement? Thanks, PJeaseTelephone, il One more item, in the Initiation Form, second
page, there is a typo in the first sentence under Section 4, Change the typo or schedule Mac Court for the
hearing, it will probably be well attended,
**********************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains information beionging to Harold,
Leahy & Kieran which is confidential and/or legally privileged, If you are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the contents
of this e-mail information is strictly prohibited, If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message,
RECEIVED
j - 13~OL.
By: &~