HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/02/1997 Regular
"It, .~ ~ ~~
.
.
.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL HELD
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1997
The city of Springfield council met in regular session in the Springfield City Council Chamber
Room, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon, on Tuesday, September 2, 1997, at 7:00 p.m., with
Mayor Morrisette presiding.
ATTENDANCE
Present were Mayor Morrisette, Councilors Ballew, Beyer, Burge, Dahlquist, and Shaver.
Councilor Maine was absent (excused). Also present were City Manager Michael Kelly,
Assistant City Manager Gino Grimaldi, City Attorney Joe Leahy, City Recorder Julie Wilson
and members of the staff.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Morrisette.
CONSENT CALENDAR
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILOR SHAVER, WITH A SECOND BY COUNCILOR BURGE,
TO ADOPT THE CONSENT CALENDAR. THE MOTION PASSED WITH A VOTE OF 5
FOR AND 0 AGAINST.
1. Claims
2. Minutes
a. August 11, 1997 - Work Session
b. August 25, 1997 - Work Session
3. Resolutions
a. RESOLUTION NO. 97-39 - A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT PROJECT 1-933. HARLOW
ROAD PUMP STATION UPGRADE. FROM EMK CONTRACTORS, INC.. IN THE
AMOUNT OF $114,841.62.
b. RESOLUTION NO. 97-40 - A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT PERMIT PROJECT 3-021:
SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION ON SOUTH 32ND STREET TO SERVE NEW
MIDDLE SCHOOL.
c. RESOLUTION NO. 97-41 - A RESOLUTION SUPPLEMENTING THE ADOPTION OF
THE 1997/1998 SPRINGFIELD CITY BUDGET. MAKING APPROPRIATIONS.
LEVYING A PROPERTY TAX AND APPROVING THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD'S
PARTICIPATION IN STATE REVENUE SHARING PROGRAM.
4. Ordinances
-. ~. -.,
.
.
.
Regular Session Meeting Minutes
September 2, 1997
Page 2
5. Other Routine Matters
a. Award the Contract for the Purchase of Traffic Signal System Upgrade, Project 5-024, to
Bi Tran Systems, Inc., in the Amount of$70,I05.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Appeal of the Decision of the Springfield Building Board of Appeals, Reference Number 97-
07-103.
Community Services Manager Dave Puent presented the staff report on this issue. The
applicant is requesting council to hear an appeal of the decision by the Springfield Board of
Appeals to deny the applicant's variance request from Section 9-7 -18( 1) of the Springfield
Sign Code (SSC) relative to the maximum allowable wall signs. Section 9-7-9 of the SSC
provides in part that if an applicant's appeal to the Board of Appeals is denied, the applicant
may request an appeal to the city council.
The applicant is requesting a variance from Chapter 9, Article 7 of the Springfield City Code.
More specifically, they are requesting a variance from Section 9-7-18(1) relative to the
maximum number of wall signs. The business is located in the 1-5 Commercial Sign District
which allows a maximum of three wall signs totaling a maximum of350 square feet.
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow 12 additional wall signs to be placed on their
building awnings. The Springfield Sign Code includes a definition which specifically
includes artwork or logos and a definition for a Wall Sign which includes signs placed on
canopies or awnings. The Building Board of Appeals heard the applicants request on August
9, 1997. Although the Board found favor with the applicants request, the Board agreed there
were no findings of fact that would provide the authority to approve the applicant's variance
request. The motion to deny the variance request passed unanimously.
The council conducted a first and second reading of the proposed additions, deletions and
changes in June of this year and approved numerous amendments to the Springfield Sign
Code. Amendments or updates to the Sign Code are historically brought before council once
each year.
Mayor Morrisette opened the public hearing.
1. Don Hescheles, Ethan Allen, 3150 Gateway Loop, spoke in support of a request for a
variance from the Springfield Sign Code, Section 9-7-2.
Mayor Morrisette closed the public hearing.
Councilor Burge respected the role of the Building Board of Appeals. He did not find any
fault to the applicants proposal. This was a design issue request. He said it was a tasteful
way for the company to display their logo. He found in favor ofthe request of the applicant.
~ ~. ~-
.
.
.
Regular Session Meeting Minutes
September 2, 1997
Page 3
He did not see any reason for denying tpe request. He said the intent of the Code is not
violated.
Councilor Shaver welcomed the company to Springfield. He said the Sign Code is updated
about once every two years. He said new situations and requests come up every now and
then. He recognized the changes in technology. He said it was difficult to draft a sign code to
anticipate needs and provide guidelines. He said the Sign Code needed to be amended if this
request was allowed. He discussed the need to address these issues. Mr. Hescheles said a
grand opening was scheduled for October 10 and he needed approximately three weeks to
order the awnings. Councilor Shaver said he recommended denying the request at this time
due to being out of conformance of the Code.
Councilor Dahlquist supported the request. He suggested they be allowed one logo per
awning as long as it did not exceed the allowed square footage.
Mr. Leahy said council could direct staff to bring back an idea that allowed the request but
did it so narrowly that it did not violate the intent of the Sign Code.
Councilor Burge said there was a need to act on the request as soon as possible.
Mr. Leahy summarized the findings of fact that must be met in order to make a variance to the
decision made.
Councilor Burge recommended a revision to the Sign Code be brought back to council next
Monday.
Mr. Leahy said he was sympathetic to concerns raised by Councilor Burge. He again said the
findings of fact must be met for approval of the variance.
Councilor Shaver recognized technology changes. He said it was a problem to keep pace and
do it fairly with all requests. He thought an adjustment could be made to the Sign Code if it
was included in the total square footage. He said this was a trend that was being incorporated
into logos and signage. He suggested this become an expedited process.
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILOR SHAVER, WITH A SECOND BY COUNCILOR
DAHLQUIST, TO DENY THE APPEAL OF THE DECISION MADE BY THE BUILDING
BOARD OF APPEALS (AFFIRM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING BOARD OF
APPEALS). THE MOTION PASSED WITH A VOTE OF 4 FOR AND 1 AGAINST
(BURGE).
IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILOR SHAVER, WITH A SECOND BY COUNCILOR
DAHLQUIST, TO DIRECT STAFF TO MAKE AN ADJUSTMENT TO THE SIGN CODE,
TO ALLOW FOR A REPETITIVE LOGO DESIGN OF THE ESTABLISHMENT, TO BE
USED, IF DESIRED, IN MORE THAN THREE LOCATIONS ON THE BUILDING, BUT
SUCH USE WOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL ALLOW ABLE FOOTAGE FOR
SIGNAGE OF THAT BUILDING. STAFF IS DIRECTED TO BRING BACK THE
LANGUAGE REVISION WITHIN TWO WEEKS ALONG WITH SCHEDULING A
~, .'
.
.
.
'" Regular Session Meeting Minutes
September 2, 1997
Page 4
PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER. STAFF IS ALLOWED TO BRING BACK A
FUTURE REVISION IN FOUR TO EIGHT WEEKS, IF AN ISSUE COMES UP THAT
CAN'T BE HANDLED WITHIN THE FIRST TWO WEEKS. A PUBLIC HEARING
WOULD BE HELD IN TWO WEEKS. THE MOTION PASSED WITH A VOTE OF 5 FOR
AND 0 AGAINST.
BUSINESS FROM THE AUDIENCE
1. Don Anderson, 961 26th Street, expressed concern regarding the Mohawk Boulevard
Development Plan.
Mr. Leahy discussed the public input process and said there would be ample opportunity for
public testimony.
COUNCIL RESPONSE
CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
BIDS
ORDINANCES
BUSINESS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL
1. Committee Appointments
2. Business from Council
a. Committee Reports
b. Other Business
1. Charter Update
Staff provided an update on the status of this issue. The deadline to file for the
September 16 Special District Election has passed. The filing deadline for the
November 4, 1997 Special District Election is September 4, 1997. The next Primary
Election is scheduled for May 19, 1998, with a filing deadline of March 20, 1998. A
November 3, 1998 General Election is scheduled for September 4, 1998.
Mr. Leahy and Mr. Grimaldi will meet to identify and review changes made to the draft
document to-date, discuss unresolved issues and provide an update to council. Mr.
Leahy also discussed some other changes that were previously recommended.
Mayor Morrisette discussed the possible changes and the intent of the project to provide
housekeeping changes, not substantial changes.
.
.
.
!('. .. .
.- Regular Session Meeting Minutes
September 2, 1997
Page 5
BUSINESS FROM THE CITY MANAGER
1. Other Business
BUSINESS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m.
Minutes Recorder - Julie Wilson
Bill Morrisette
Mayor
Attest: I
~~n-<1Jt' C(j~
City Recorder