HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments Miscellaneous 7/2/2008 (2)
.
.
,
HOPKINS Steve
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
acritter@earthlink.net
Wednesday, July 02, 20082:33 PM
HOPKINS Steve
case number SUB 2008-00029 Cris Tabor -Griffin Comments
Steve Hopkins
7/2/2008
City of Springfield
p.m.
Urban Planning Division
2:30
Thanks Steve for your time and attention Monday 6/30 and today 1/2. Just to recap our
discussion today the chain link fence along the property line of 2103 North 5th Street was
stated upon purchase of our property to be our fence. We ask that it. be allowed to remain
and if possible we ask that the new privacy fence (hopefully eight feet tall) be carefully
installed or set back enough farther back on the south side so that our fence not be
impacted by installation of the new privacy fence. We request this because the chain link
fence joins in with additional fencing on our property which we would like to remain
intact as this development arises to our Sputh side. The chain link fence keeps our dogs
in our yard and we do not want to jeopardize that.
We hope that the privacy fence for all phases (one through three) will be put up before
development 'begins to provide some'barrier between us and the construction process as it
unfolds. We are still interested in additional landscape screening along the South side
of the privacy fence as well to serve .as a sound barrier.
We would like to know 'as much in advance as
be (i..e. how close to the street it will be
will be so that if necessary we can perform
existing bushes and trees.
possible exactly where the proposed fence will
and where it will be aligned) and how tall it
pruning prior to the fence installation of
,
Sincerely,
Wendy and Syb EagleWolfe
home 541-746-4192, work 541-335-2757
1