Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work PLANNER 11/30/2007 .> TYPE II TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW, PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: Maple School Project Proposal: demolish existing school and construct new building Case Number: PRE2007-00081 Project Address: 2109 J Street Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-03-36-12 TL 100 Zoning: Public Land Open Space (PLO)" Overlay District(s): Drinking Water Protection (DWP) 5-10 year TOTZ Applicable Refinement Plan: NjA Refinement Plan Designation: NjA Metro Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR) Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: November 30,2007 Application Submittal Deadline:" May 30, 2008 , Associated Applications: tree felling I C::ITYOF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW'TEAM "I POSITION REVIEW OF I NAME I Proiect Planner Land Use Planninq Steve Hopkins 1 Transportation Planninq Enqineer Transportation 1 Gary McKenney 1 Public Works Civil Enqineer Utilities I Matt Stouder I Public Works Civil Engineer I Sanitary & Storm I Matt Stouder Sewer 1 Deputy Fire Marshal I Fire and Life Safety I Gilbert Gordon" I Community Services Manaqer 1 Buildinq 1 Dave Puent APPUC::ANJ"'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM Owner Springfield Public Schools Steve Barrett 525 Mill Street Springfield OR 97477 Architect Dave Guadagni Robertson/Sherwood Architects 132 E Broadway Suite 540 Euqene OR 97401 11/30/07 PHONE 726-3649 726-4585 736-1035 736-1035 726-2293 726-3668 ~ SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application Fee. The site review fee will be based on an impervious surface area of 10,672 sf. The tree felling fee will be based on the number of trees to be felled. Less than 10 is $956(base fee) + 5%(tech fee) + $155(postage). o One additional copy of the Site Plan reduced to 8'h"x 11" Complete Incomplete See Notes G( D ~ 8 V2" X 11" Copy of Site Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 60 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete Incomplete See Notes D ~ D o Site Plan Complete "Incomplete See Notes D ~ D ~ D D o o .~ [g] o o ~ D D 11/30/07 Deed and Preliminary Title Report Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect or Engineer Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings Location and height of existing or proposed fences, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs Location, dimensions and number of typical, compact and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs and striping Lot coverage calculations of all parking and vehicular areas 2 ~ D D On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation D 0 [g] Location of on-site exterior lighting [g] D 0 Location, type and number of bicycle parking spaces ~ 0 0 Location of existing and proposed transit facilities Phased Development Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase, Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. Complete Incomplete See Notes D ~ D o Landscape Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes D [g] D ~ D 0 0 0 ~ IE] 0 0 IE] D D " Phased Development Plan Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to indude calculation of landscape coverage Vegetative screening in accordance with SDC Section 31.160 Written description, including specifications of the permanent irrigation system Location and type of ,street trees List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and method bf planting Notes: 1. Provide cut sheets for the outdoor lights. 2. Provide fence details. Describe the fence in the narrative and/or provide a drawing. 3. Tree felling. Show the existing trees that are at least 8" dbh and overlay them on the site plan. Identify which trees will be removed. 11/30/07 3 4. Details regarding the bicycle parking to verify compliance with SDC 4.6-100. 5. SDC 4.7-195 requires a Traffic Impact Study and Parking Study. It should answer the following questions: a. How many vehicle trips will there be on the 23rd street entrance? b. How many trips from delivery vehicles? Will .the delivery vehicles go to the J Street or the 23rd street entrance? c. How many private vehicles (parents) will pick up/drop off students? How many students walk/bike? Additional Comments not related to the completeness of the application 1. Will the rooftop mechanicals be screened from'view? 2. Is it possible to provide covered parking for all the bicycles? 3. What is the difference in student capacity of the .old vs, the new school? 4. Will the 23rd street entrance be open on evenings and 'weekends for Kidsports activities, etc? uf J-t ::'cbG'd c.J;..;...' 5, Vilill there be a permanent irrigation system for the landscaping? O~\ 1",,< ~;' z..." F d ? I' ,'I) .frc, lit e (1<\')': 11/30/07 . 4 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Transportation Engineer: Gary McKenney, Case#: PRE2007-00081 Applicant: School Dist 19 - Maple Elem. TRANSPORTATION o Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), facility. Comp.'ete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ D Copy of R0WApproach Permit Application o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 AA.. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, Metro Plan, and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ D Traffic Impact Study 0 Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ D Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) 1 D ~ o [g] 2 Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails Location; widths (of paving and rightcof- way) and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications, or ' D D Revised 10/25/07 D D 3 other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including ownership and maintenance status, if , applicable Location of existing and required traffic control devices Transportation Notes: 1. Provide consistent symbols and ledgend to distinguish City-owned street lights from site lighting. 2. Show removal of existing items required to accommodate sidewalk improvements along 23rd Street. 3. Provide e'ngineering evaluation of need for school zone signing on 23rd Street, Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . Street lighting improvements will be required to meet current City standards. . What is plan for 21st Street in area of existing staff parking? Revised 10/25/07 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Deputy Fire M'arshal: Gilbert Gordon Case #: PRE2ci07-0008~ FIRE o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire N.ote(s) D On-site vehicular circulation D o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) m III Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities Fire Notes:' 1. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: 1. Fire hydrants shall meet the requirements of 2007 Springfield Fire Code 508.5.7. 2. Water supply and access shall be established and maintained prior to combustible materials being brought onto the site per SFC 1410 and 1411. Access will also need to be maintained at the existing building. ' 3. School fire drills and student evacuation will need. to take into account the construction on site, student safety and mainte'nance of fire access. If ?w L.t7C~'? ;. /"1;,:> Revised 9/24/0~ TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Engineer: Jesse Jones Case#: PRE2007-00080 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions ,Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) [g] l%l [g] [g] I%l [g] l%l I%l Revised 10/25/07 o D o D o D 1M D Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map. , The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts" trees and impervious s!-lrface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map, Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Sections 5.17-100,4.1-100,4,2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following information: . Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ 0 I, 0 [?Q 1 l2J D l2J o , o Grading and Paving Plan Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) [g] [g] [?Q l2J o ~ o o D o D ~ D l2J 2 3 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Location and width of all existing and proposed . easements Location of existing and required power poles, , transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities ~ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Planting plan' prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system' Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 fC?ot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the'contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with the completed Storm water scopingSheet attached. The plan, calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete ~ Revised 10/25/07 Incomplete III See pViI Note(s) , , Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study PW Notes: L Provide the location and width of all existing and proposed easements, Provide a 7.0' P.U.E. along the Thurston Road frontage of the parcel. 2. Specify elevations for stormwater' system components. 3. Provide proposed amount of cut and fill. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . specify'seed mix' and application rate for bioswales, . The trash enclosure must be covered, hydraulically isolated and drained to the sanitary sewer, . Check sheet C-1l1-T for storm line off of water system. " Revised '10/25/07 ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE-APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Applicable D ~ 0 ~ D ~ Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC Section 16.100(3) Riparian'Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW D ~ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present ' ~ D Where the development area is within an overlay district applicable, address the additional standards of the overlay district ~ D If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC Article 38 D ~ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property D ~' Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review' ~ D Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development o ~ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use, Variance or Modification of Provisions as specified in SDC Article 10 or 11 11/30/07 5 THIS APPLICATION IS: o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING C8J INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE City Planner Date Multiple copies. Submit the following documents for a complet~ application: Application form: \ copy Narrative: copy Site Plan (8'12 xll): I copy (labeled "Site Plan") Tree Felling (8'12 xU) \ copy (labeled "Tree Felling") ". Large plan set: I'D copies (do not fold) Traffic study: .;, copies Drainage plan: ~ copies Geotech Report: -3 ' copies ./ Other: coP! oj +-r}Jl? r<"For} 11/30/07 6 This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Sections 3.050(3)-(6) and Oregon Revised Statutes 227,178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within' 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120-day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request,that the City proceed without the information, You must indicate by either signing this' form or'by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date .of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. . If you indicate herein or in your written response the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre-Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of' starting the 120-day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the .new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. ~ I; the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the l80-day timeline. Owner/Applicant's Signature 11/30/07 7