Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 12/2/2008 IASSESSOR'S MAP NO: I Property Address: . &e. kc;a/ ISize of ProperlY: I I Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: I Existing Use: S::ity of Springfield , Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 2 Annexation Development Issues Meeting (DIM) '. . , , , ~. . . A 'Prospective /l (' Applicant Name: (~/7j/. gj: aJPR//I/kPI;Z/) Company: Address: I Prospective -:/ ,; ? Applicant's Rep.: h//5Lic /VCJ:Kf:S Icompany: kl: jjt!-/</~(J #/Z/Z-t/ IAddress: ... / , . / ProperlY Owner: 1. PAJG (bu" / rY /t~ tY tF up, . / , Company: . I Address: ,. ITAX LOT NOeS): jJ(=sc..~/PTio/t/ .. ~:~ Phone: Fax: . E-mail: '\ I , I I I , I I I , I I I I I I Phone: Fax: E-mail: t/lrs~ Phone: Fax: E-mail: Acres 0 Proposed Use: CilY Zoning: , Prospective Applicant: Metro Designation: &A<~-/d'.1l l~ Signature jF TJA U k"A?n.di J. l.&~ Print .,/ Square Feet 0 Population: ., Date: Date Rec13ived: DEe - 2 2008 '. . '. ' , ,~~ Case No.JZON~oo~-ood1fIJ Date: I~- ~- GB . 5"'1~ I . Application Fee: $.0 Technical Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ 5:LL 0.3- PROJECT NUMBER: PRSlro& - OO:x;,.q- Reviewed bY:1)1i J\ j AA...J PostaQe Fee: $0 . Revised 1O{3{08 1 of 2 l, .. Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist, . o Application Fee ~ refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fe'e 'calculation formula.' A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. o Development Issues Meeting Application Form o Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is Iimit~d to five questions. Examples of relevant issues for annexation include but are not limited to the following: . Contiguity. . Availability and capacity of surrounding city services . Affected special districts . Fees Ten (10) Copies of the Proposal - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address :as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in, the application. o Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.7, Annexations. o o o o D o o o o o o o Revised 1O{3{08 Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 1'1" x 17" Scale appropriate to the area involved and sl!fficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' North arrow Date of preparation Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number Dimensions (in feet) and ,size (either square feet or acres) of the annexation area Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, ,including connection points On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of dr'ain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageyvays to be retained Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for future public road right-of-way Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots , " How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets Future development plan, which may include proposed and existing buildings (location, dimensions, size) or other impervious surfaces Date Received: DEe - 2 2008 Original Submittal 2 of 2 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 541-726-3759 Phone C Jf Springfield Official Receipt Development Services Department Public Works Department. RECEIPT #: 2200800000000001691 Date: 12/02/2008 I :06:58PM !NT CHGS Paid By 420-62232-850025 MLK PRKW Item Total: Check Number Authorization Received By Batch Number Number How Received Amount Due 521.00 $521.00 Job/Journal Number ZON2008-00041 Description UGB Development Issues Mtg Payments: Type of Payment Amount Paid kal !NT CHGD In Person Payment Total: $521.00 $521.00 ~o../~ ~Ob~ ~~W~ ..'. l1L~cIvutJuG~~ ~ P ~~ ~.~6b Date Received: . DEe - 2 2008 Original Submittal cReceintl Page I of 1 12/2/2008 ;/ . Memorandum November 21, 2008 To: DIM Participants From: Richard Perry, EfT Re: DIM for annexation of public land along the Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway and surrounding areas. The focus o{this DIM meeting is to initiate the process for annexing R'operty that,is currently under county jurisdiction, The total area of the properties is not large but involves several small sections in the MLK Parkway area. This annexation is intended to create ownership and maintenance consistency within the new city streets and at this time does not include any privately oWned property, Should any property owners wish to be included with this procedure, the city would allow them to include their property but will not compel any owner to do so, Included in the DIM Submittal Packet is the Agenda Item Summary, the Council Briefing:Memorandum, an 8.5xll map, a tentative legal description and an Ilx17 map that shows more clearly the areas intended to be annexed, The legal description is currently being revised by the survey department of the' City of Springfield to confinn that zoning, jurisdiction and lot lines are in proper order. A final legal description will be submitted before presentation to the city counciL ' The five (5) key elements to discuss at the DIM Meeting will be: I) Review of the presented maps to ensure that all needed parcels are included in this action, 2) Ensure that the action is consistent with the City Council Resolution, 3) Review the public involvement process including notification, neighborhood meetings and wholho,,: will this be handled internally, 4) Review the internal process and set a timeline for completion, 5) Schedule a target date to present to counciL Date Received:. DEe - 2 2008 , Original submittal. .!. Me<:ting Date: Meeting Type: Department: . Staff Contact: Staff Phone No: , Esfunated Time: AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ,SP RINGF IELD CITY COUNCIL ITEM TITLE: ACTION REQUESTED: ISSUE STATEMENT: JUlY2l'200~8 . Regular Meetin ' Public Wor . Ken V ogeni!yf 736.7124, [ Consent Calendar CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF LANDS FOR PUBLIC ROADWAYS: MARTIN LUTHER KlNG, JR: PARKWAY, PROJECT P20208 . , The Council is requested to consider and adopUnot adopt the following resolution: A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRlTORY TO THE CITY OF SPRlNGFIELD PURSUANT TO SECTION 5,7 OF THE SPRlNGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE. Annexationoflands associated with the Martin Luther King, Jr. Parkway, is cine of the final steps in completing the new arterial link and assuming responsibility from Lane County: This includes all future mainten!'llceand legal jurisdiction within the rights of way. A TT ACHMENTS: Attachment A: Council Briefing Me~orandum D,ISCUSSIONI . FINANCIAL IMPACT: ~~.' . . ". .., '" Attachment B: Resolution Annexation transfers legal jurisdiction within tjle rights of way and public property to the City of Springfield and allow~ the City of Spririgfield Police Department to investigate and track-accident reports.> Also, any citations issued would be processed . through Municipal Court rather than Lane County Court The annexation of the rights-of-way for this project may create islands of un- annexed County land within the City limits, The City has no recent history of unilateral annexations and there are no plans feir unilaterally annexing any of that territory, but State law gives 'the CitY the authority to do so. , With the exception of public staff time dedicated to the annexation. process, there are no other significant financial impaCts associated with the initiation by Council . Resolution, If initiated, the proposed annexation ordinance would be scheduled to come before the City Council at a public heariJjg on or about October 6, 2008. A second reading and adoption ofa proposed ordinance annexing the subject area could occur on or about November. 3, 2008. ' , " . , Date Received: DEe - 2.200S Original Submittal " ,J MEMORANDUM City of Sprin,;-ield To: Gino Grimaldi, City Manager Susie Smith, Public Works Director Ken V 9geney, City Engineer \J"" Jeff Paschall, Supervising Civil Engineer July 15, 2008 .COUNCIL BRIEFING MEMORANDUM From: Date: Subject: Annexation of Lands for Public Roads: Martin Luther King, Jr. Parkway , , . '1 ' , , ' . , , , , ISSUE The City Manager requests City Council authority to sign the application for annexation for. la,nds associated with the Martin Luther King, Jr. Park:way, asa part of. completing the new arterial link and assuming responsibility from Lane County. . . BACKGROUND 1 . I I In February 2003, the City of Springfield and Lane G:ounty executed an Intergove=ental . Agreement (IGA) for the use of Lane County Cornrrlunity Development Road Improvement Assistance Program (CAP) fundsto design and conStruct the Martin Luther King, Jr. , Parkway. In this agreement, it is stated that the project roadways Will b~ City streets and that . -, the City' will be responsible for maintenance, In ord~r for the City to assume maintenance responsibility the City and County agreed the streets:would become City right-of-way and be annexed into the City limits. Much of the MLK Jr.P~kway right of way is within City limits, throUgh annexations associated with the PeaceHea1th RiverBend project; however, over half still needs annexation. In addition, there are segments of Pioneer Parkway East and West, Hayden Bridge Way at the roundabout and a small portion of the Belt1irie/Game Farm Road intersection that the City Engineer and County Engineer have agreed should also be transferred, for a total annexation of 11.34 acres. DISCUSSION Properties proposed for aimexation are limited to street right-of-way and City-owned lands only. There are no privately owned lands proposed for annexation with this action. Arinex~tion'of these lands may create islands of un-annexed County lands within City limits. State law gives the City the authority to forcibly annex lands in island within the city limits , Without the ~equest or consent of the affected l'wl'",;j owners. The City of Springfield has no plans at this time to forcibly annex these island areas, and has not exercised the authority to do so in the recent past. It is likely the creation of these islands may cause some concern among property owners within the islands. City staff intends to send letters to l'wl'",;j AnnaaliOrl of Lands for Pub/if: Roads: Martin Luther King, Jr. Parkylay Attachrilent A Page 1 of 4 Page I af4 Date Received: . DEe - 2 2008 Original Submittal ,I ' ~\ J I,,'; owners within the new islands to explain the City's intention not to annex theselands without a request from property owners, or to comply with statutory requirements concerning , development of land or providing public wastewater service in the event of failed septic systems. The letter would also confirriI for these property owners thatthis annexation action is strictly to create ownership and maintenance consistency with .the new City streets. Figure 1 shows the islands that will be created by the proposed anp.exation. Date Received: DEe - 2 2008 Original Submittal A11!.Jexalion of Lands for Public Roads: Martin Luther King" Jr. Parkway Page 2 of4 , " , " '. . '..' Attachment A Page 2,of 4 , I' ~ i " "~ii ;, Figure I - Map of proposed annexation and islands created -" .~/ ---, .~',s76~2'~,~,,~;:~:':"~: .--:--:--..~-_ "',/"\ , , ~;...,.j-:.r., ~'..,' - '; } \. . \. "\-1,':"\ \r. r' '-~~''-'_,~l._' ,., '. '!i. '... ~\., ~ :l~.::;,:-..,?', {j~"~,~~",_,,, J~.-,;" 'i~~:~tc\~~_).~:", -"""-"',"~-_!!.. .~.:"'. ~ :1J-J~~~~-~\ , 't.........i..-""~"-.=r.... , ."'-;$~.o-~:;:::: ~~~j , -....... Martin Luther Kin~ Jr. Parkwav -~ ) ','/:" , , I i.-' , ',' ,~~-_.-. ~"'''''"":-- ...~.. ./ it ....; r :j irB .,;X. <~~,p.,:lf::M_ '9.' ,-" '~r-' . >( ~ ~~-'-'~~:A\.}~ ~""(~"-'''J }J~W ?"o=--~ \~,. ~,~~ j c /' ,I =).~).~ L}.f'~sC,~1r} /~:~".,..~,...,. "v"". 'I "".' :~:~~l~~l~"~ L",v-.-J i -,..t-~ .....~,~ ~~,~ -:~"tJt:~ :s:~ . j L,"...~,~t~ ~.-~,.' M~---~ -_.,L..,1.. (""'-"""~~" ''''r''''':'" , " . ~ " I ,-'~ ,~-f~~ \""--0...,-'_....; :1 ~-~j .- . f , l~~' ---"'" :i~'RiiMJl_1Jf' .;,;" '-- . 7" -=.."..QolU-";!.-'!.,,_ ,__.., ~ ~~.... -<-: "'" t'~:0~ :~ :.:i . ' --;~J~- to f .,. -'..,. i . ;~... , ~-" , f,J-lt: ..........(' =--~--~ ~~~~~' ~.;~~ --:"~, . : ;::f"-"'\",-__'C7~:! '_.~'~.._~ ~~~~:"~~&;~ .", ;; ~ t~J~0~~S'. ~~f!3E 7S~;..:tt::~ .r... -,~j ,j.-s~~" , , f. J ;" Annexation of Landsfor Public Roads: Martin Luther King. Jr. Parkway Attachment A Page 3 of 4 Proposed Annexation Area r--- "I Isiand c'reation Area '~ Da~3t{eceived : DEe - 2 2008 Original Submittal FINANCIAL IMPACT .. With the exception of public staff time dedicated to the annexation process, there are no other significant' financial impacts associated with the initiaiion by:Co~ncil Resolution. . . . , COUNCn, ACTION REOUESTED The City Council is requested to grant the City Manager authority to sign the annexation, application. } Date Received: DEe - 2 2008 Original SUbmiltpl ". ,." .1 Annexation of Landsfor Public Roads: Martin Luther King, Jr. Par~ay Page 4 of 4 /: Attachment A', Page 4 of 4, RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD PURSUANT TO SECTION 5,7 OF THE SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Section 5.7-125 of the Sprin'gfield Development Code to initiate annexation of contiguous property to the City Limits of Springfield, and, WHEREAS, the propertY. to be annexed is publicly owned property and rights of way' of the State of Oregon, and '. , WHEREAS, the territory to be annexed is within the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth Boundary, is contiguous to the City of Springfield arid can be provided with a full range of key urban services including sanitary sewer, water, storm drainage, police and fire protection, electrical service, land use controls, street lights and paved streets, recreational f.acilities arid library, WHEREAS, annexation procedures shall be initiated and followed in accordance with the public notice and hearing process, criteria of approval and ordinance adoption procedures contained in Springfield Development Code Section 5,7- Annexations. ' NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES' RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: , Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby announce its intention to conduct public hearings to consider annexation of territory generally described as publicly owned rights of way and public property located between existing City limits at the projected intersection of"T" Street with Pioneer Parkway to the intersection of Game Farm Road with Mallard Avenue as generally depicted on the attachments Exhibits 1 and 2, ; Section 2. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption by the Coundl and approval by ~~ 'i " ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this _ day of 2008, by a vote of _for and _against 1 APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this -+- day of July, 2008, I I ATTEST: Mayor City Recorder \. I' ,',.. . " KEV~E\HED 11 APPROVED AS TO FOFjM, ' \......~j \-~,......" DATE: 1 \ ,..., \' ~ OFFICE OF CI'ry ATmRNEY Date Received: DEe ~ 2 2008 Original Submittal MLK Annexation Description Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot II of Buena Vista, First Addition; filed arid recorded in Book 20, Page 25, Plat Records of Lane County Oregon.' Thence South 880 06:40" East a distance of 26.54 feet alo~g theNorthe~ly line of said ~ Buena Vista to the current Easterly right of way line of Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway, " . Thence along the said Easterly right of way the following 5 courses: " , I). South ]20 13' 50", East a distance of 1745.70 feet, more or.1ess toa point of curvature; , . .'., 2) Thence with a non tangent c~e turning to the left, with:an arc length of259.89 feet, with a radius of \487,00 feet, with a chord bearing of South 190 20' 20" East, witli a ' chord length of259.56 feet, to a point; ,," ') 3) Thence South430 22' 54" East a distance of 21.03' feet; 4) Thence Siluth270 53' 20" East a distance of 68,54 feet; " 5) Thence North 720 39' 32" East a,distance of 22.45 feet to a point on the Westerly right of way of Wayside Lane; , ThenCe South 880 06' 50" East a distance of 60:00 feet across Wayside Lane to a point on the Easterly right of way; , Thence South 01053' 10',' West a distance of 10.0.08 feet alqng the said Westerly right of way,to a point of curvature; , ' , Thence with a non tangent cUrve turning to the left, with an arclength of 31.22 feet, with a radius of 61.00 feet, with a chord pearing of South 930 34' 32" East, with a chord length Of30,88 feet to a point on the Northerly right of way of Hayden Bridge Way; , Thence along the Northerly right of way of Hayden Bridge'Way,South S80 05' 23" East a . , .. distance of 12.06 feet;' , Thence leaving the Northerly right of way along the match line of the concrete-asphalt joint in Hayden Bridge Way South 01054' 37" WeSta'distahce of 83.78 feet to a point on the Southerly right of way of Hayden Bridge Way; , . " " Thence along the, ' " , , Southerly right of way of Hayden Bridge Way North 89040' 34': West a distahc~ of7.96 feet; ',' ,: . , Date Received: " -,', , f'!.~ '~j .' , EXHIBIT 1 PAGE 1 OF 4 i " DEe - 2 2008 Original Submittal , .' Thence Leaving the Southerly Hayden Bridge Way right of way and along the Easterly right of way of Pioneer Parkway, which is also the Westerly line of Grovedale, as platted .__..1 n_.---..J-..J:- n__l~ 10 0.......,.,. ")C _1....+...0.........,..."'... ~.f'T tOI......r'/"\,,,.,h., nr",rrf\" <:::t'\l1th a.uu ~\"l;;\,..oVJ."""""'U. J.J..I J.JVV.D.. ..LV, J.,U.5.... ....J, Y~U.L ,.......;--....................... ...............- --...._~J' ~.-e>~-, ---- 02000'35" West a distance of317,93Feet; . Thence leaving plat boundary and continuing along the Easterly right of way of Pioneer Parkway South 120 13' 50" East a distance of79.47 feet; to the intersection with the North line of Lot 6 of above said Grovedale which is the current City Limits line, Thence along the existing city limits line the follo~g' courses: I) Thence along the now vacated North line of Lot 6 of GrovedaleNorth 880 05' 23" West a distance of 19,55 feet to the former Northwest comer thereof, 2) Thence along the now vacated Westerly boundary of said Grovedale South 020 00' , 35" West a distance of 166,84 feet to a point of intersection with the now vacated Westerly right of way ofTbird Street which is was also the Easterly right of way of the now vacated Southern Pa~ificRailroad line; . 3) Thence continuing along the last said right of way South 12013'50" East a distance of 935.87 'feet to a angle point in the city limits; 'I 4) Thence leaving the last said right of way and across Pioneer Parkway right cif way along the city limits line, North 880 15' 24" West a distance of 113.35 feet to a point on ' , ' , the WeSterly right of way of Pioneer Parkway; , ", ~ Thence along the Westerly right of way of Pioneer Parkway North 120 13' 50" West a distance of 1404.46 feet to a point that intersects a comer the current citY limits; , Thence along the current city limits line the followllig 5 courses:. 1) Thence North 12018' 23" West a distance of82.70 feet; 2) Thence North 490 32' 14" West a distance of 48.31 feet;, 3) Thence North 880 0'5' 23" West a distance of7.50 feet; 4) Thence North?1 054' 37'! East a disUU;ce of81.50 feet; , 5) Thence North 880 05' 35" West a distance of212.64 feet to a point of intersection with the Northerly right of way of Hayden Bridge Way; ThenCe leaving the Northerly right of way of Hayden Bridge Way along the Westerly right of way of Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway the; following 16 courses: I) Thence North 830 09' 10" East a distance of 39.46 feet; Date Received: DEe - 2 2008 '1. , " EXHIBIT 1 PAGE 2 OF 4 Original Submittal , '., 2) Thence South 880 06'03" East a distance of24.02 feet; " 3) Thence North 820 41' 38" East a distance of37.46 feet; 4) Thence NO,rth 77023' 02" East a distance of 6L99feetj 5) Thence North 530 34' 34" East a distance of20.58 feet: 6) Thence with a curve turning to the left, with an arc length of 48.77 feet, with a radius of 71.00 feet, with a chord bearing of North ?2041' 02" East, with ~ chord length of 48,77 feet; , ' 7) Thence with a curve turning to the left, ,with an arc length of 49 .56 feet, with a radius of 88.00 feet, with a chord bearing of North 160 36' 04" East, with a chord length of . 48,90 feet; 8) ThenceNorth 00019' 55" East a distance of 52.8,7feet; , .. 9) Thence NortJi 120 13' 50" West a distance of202:00 feet; .,' , . 10) Thence NortJi 170 i~' 37" West' a distance of 45.18 f~et; ,11) Thence North 14" 55' 32" West a distance.of32.04 feet; 12) Thence North 010 i3' 58" East a distance of23,.65 feet; , . " ~ 13) Thence North 120 13' 50" West a distance of 1601.16 feet; 14) Thence North 14008' 23" West a distance of90.05 feet;, I 5) Thence North 21 0 18' 09" West a distance of 12.11 feet; 16) Thence North 130 31' 25" West a distance of9.98 feet to a point of intersection with ' the Southwesterly boundary of the abandoned Soutl1e~ Pacific Railroad right of way~ ' , Thence leaving the Westerly right of way of Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway and along the said abandon railroad right of way, with a curVe turning to the left, with an arc length of274:32 feet, with a radius of 925,04 feet, with a chord bearing of North 310 34' 37" West, with a chord length of273.31 feet; " '" Thence North 40007' 36" West a distance of 175.36 feet to ~ point on the Easterly right' of way, of Game Farm Road; , , .' ~. Thence North 02" 25' 01" West a distance of98.28 feet along the Easterly right of way of Game Farm Road to a point where the right of way makes ajog; Date Received: DEe - 2 2008 EXHIBIT 1 PAGE 3 OF 4 Original Submittal ,.' ". " , Thence continuing along the Easterly Game Farm Road Right of way South 390 51' 38" East a distance of 24,1 0 feet to a point where the right of way intersect the Northerly line nf'th". ~hnvp._ 1:;:::1;;'; ::lh::l;nrlnnp.t1 rnilro::in right ofwav" ' - ---- --- "- ----. ,. -' - - .. ,Thence leaving the Easterly line of Game Farm Road and along the Northerly line of the , above said abandon rail road right of way, South 40007' 36" East a distance of229.01 fret; . , Thence with a curve turnillg to the right, with an arclength of 3,30.43 feet, wiilt a radius of985.04 feet, with a chord bearing of South 30027' 57" East, with a chord length of 328.88 feet to the point of beginning. ' . And also including: Beginning at a point on the easterly right-of~way line of Game Farm Road which bears ' North 88052'20" East a distance of 65,00 feet, North 1007'40;' West a distance of28,99 ' feet and North 2024'44" West a distance of286.56 feet from the northeast comer of Lot 11 of Zachary Place as platted and recorded in Book.75 at Pages 852 thru 854 of the Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence northerly along said right-of-way line, of varying width, a distance of 1 n feet, more or less, to the projection of the north right-of-way line , ' , QfBeltline Road; thence, leaving said right-of-way along said projected line westerly a distance of 55 feet, more or less, to the westerly right-of-way of Game Farm Road; thence, leaving said projected line along said westeriy right-ofc~ay southerly a distance of 176 feet, more or less, to a point which lays on the same line, when measured perpendicular to the centerline of Game Farm RoadJas the point of beginning; thence, leaving said westerly right-of-way North 8r35' 16"IEast a distance of 50 feet, more or less; to the point of beginning. P:I83(lO.OO' .{J7\SURVEYlMLK Annexation Descliption:dOC' , . Date Received: 1 'j . , . DEe ~ 2 2008 \, . f , Original Submittl'l i " < , ;,"1' EXHIBIT 1 PAGE: 4 OF 4 , . '~. , City of Springfield MLK Parkway Annexation July 15,2008 t-~'- -, '.. t~~r~~-/-! \ l, , ~ANct ~~: r:----\.~""'_w:/l , J , " ',",'\;~~,,' "';;'<p' ~ t '. .':~ -' , .'.rrt ,t;.. ,"~ <' , i~ " ~~d' ,.',,' ,..;'.'.\ ~ IS'llIt--~..~.. ,',' .. " ~'~, ~ I.... oor" :. ~ r_<'~b~ _ ': '., ,,::I 6''''0_'''= '" ',' p , RA!.ll>IilOA"l;' , --]'.:1 y-.", ,'.~::'C: / t)g! ~~ \ B~~4.~:~ t~,;,',:,.,' . ~!2c I-dALEl :IM\; " ',., ~ li01.mf b1.~',:,,__.::~c~.1. --~:,., - i- ';, ' " :\:!:".~' '-:~ - tlo\ij;~ ~ . ...._;~ :.,~r';(', ,~'3:i1 ~'~ .;; -: " - <\ .:\.', f.;' .~ ~, ':: 1'.,'" Ii " ,-" , ,"'Jf<.", '" '. ",' - __W:~~l1~... r 1.P Qt,. ",'. ;'::;; -r.t "',:;:t!f,, '-.! ' ~:."- ~!~~::': ,:-~JQ ~.:'. \'7, " '~ ' 1\ '/,),,;,1 '.;/~ ;.a'''';~\',:,a''.~'.;,u+, '" ,.3'..., '. T", "";;oS'" '.' , , _ON RO ...ro.Nl ;){}::C '":':'~::I/,t,"', '/i~/;'i 4~.~i ~ 4~ ~J~ luu~ ~"~r",;;>'; ," :,~11)~i~ ~ ~~~::"" i: ~ r'jC;'.. ".~;L'"~;~'t"~,;,;,,,~,~ ~' :3' lIKtIALE: DIi __ ~~~i::.;~ ' ~ Q --\fJOl)bl~ i;';.';;;:~:~lJ ".'-~:.;:_:'. ..; A\ft.. 'I I!~ !? ~, ' , '.~= '1 '~s.lJ] ~ at t 1IQf"~ 1~_ il L~~, ..~\,: ~,'T'" ~VEro,Vl:: ST '~AST ~,! _~..J __J aliUl~ no I ;d ;\> ~' KRUSE:; ~AY ~J =-~J II I ,. ~ Annexation, Area 5 <> -r~l 9 scom GLErinR ~f .. , l! 'ii } Date Received: DEe - 2 2008 Original submittal, , ~ ,BAmilsER & HUBBARD .ENGINEERS !fl. ExHiBIT 2 PAGE 1 of 1 W GAME FARM RD " . " illOGt..E c ~ l'BI.VO w ~ z w . ~ :l . ~ Q ~ ~ ~ '" ~ . ~ , BERKSHIRE ST .2 if , < ~ C ~ '" ~ . '" Z U Z ~ ~ SUSSEX ST WARWICK IN RElofNCV OR PRIVATE ROAD '" ~ ~ ~ ~ . . " z o . o ~ . . w ~ ~ Z . ~ U '" ~ 0" <I . g O~ ~ ,.0 u +~ .'" ". d' > ~ ~ '" o c z fll o 510 1,020 Feet :........: , , . . ........... Proposed Annexations City Limits rnl Tax Lots WL~ TMtlI...""_...._1hIll.~~~_~ U-1..1........'.oponlibiltyfor.n~IOllordl.....lII ..mglromarry_,__orpot__~ .-...... . " '\, GATEWAY lP POSTAL WAY City o. Springfield: MLK Annexations ~ . ~ i< '" & KRUSE WAY Z Q ;! . '" Ii: PRIVATE ROAD ~ ~ ~ '" " o . " z ~ z . ! ~ . z ~ . ~ c GAME FARM RD A~ ...~ ~.. ~ ~ ~ o z ~ . os o g A ~~ '" 'b" "" ~~ nNAMOU IN . MALLARD AVE FLAMINGO AVE BHRINE RD COlONIAL OR NICHOLAS DR ETHAN CT '\ ~~ ~...~ ~ ~ ~"" t>... "<to " ~'<- PINEDALE AVE SPRINGDALE AVE ~ BROOKDAL EAVE . ~ os ~ ~ o ~ u S CLOVERLEAF LP z ~ w ;; ~ . 'S u UNDALE DR -, , , , . , , . , . , , , , - , . . . , , ',' .' " " ...... ., " ., " .. " . DEAOMONO FERRY RO .. \ " . \ 0:. ..'" 'i<rfi~~ 1 r\,; o.~ 1 :04-A)( "'.,. rn z " c z '" .. z i . ~ , PRIVATE EOIE OR OAKDAlE AVE KIRK AVE 01 . . . , :.; ~.. "o~ .,v ."....-(<:.\0 SEWARD AVE 3 w o ~ i ALLEN AVE ~ . ~ c o ~ 'S ~ . . U CAMBRIDGE ST ALLEN AVE HAYDEN BRIDGE WAv ~ " '" z ~ > " . z . GREENVALE OR z o os . " w > " ~ c WOODLANE DR ~ . ~ o ~ ~ . z ~ Li HAYDEN BRIDGE Pl z ~ vsr Date ReeoivefJ: DEe - 2 2008 OrigInal Subnuttal z ~ o ~ ~ z u g: ROYALDEl L.H o (j RIVER KNOll WAY .. ~ . z ~ "0 ....... '?.. c~ ..~ ~c .. ""'f<lT "'EA DOW WAy HAYDEN BRIDGE RD - . vsr ~ . z ~ ~ ,.. . . - . , , . . i \ . . . , . , : c.. . .' . ~~ .~ "i~ ~ 'C~ .~, .:f.~ ~ ~~ , ~, ~~. -"- , ". ...~ :z . . . ' , . . ' , ' , . , ' . . . ' , . . ' , . , ' , . . ~ , . " . . . , ' , ,- , . , . . . . ' , - " " " -, '. '. " " " ~~ :~ \\ . . . . " , . , . ~. ~ . , z 0 u c . .i z S MANSFIELD S1 " SEWARD AVE f z z . > u ~ ~ ~ . z . t- BLACKSTONE "7 t; ~ ~ ,'" ;; ,'" 41 '. ,.... City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Annexation Application Narrative Annexation to the City of Springfield is a land use decision made by the.5pringfield City Council in accordance with Springfield Development Code (SDC) Section 5.7- 100, Annexations, and other applicable sections of th~ Code. City staff reviews the annexation proposal ancj makes a recommendation to Council on timing, appropriateness, legality, and availability of services. The Council then makes a decision and adopts an Ordinance. The chart that follows generally summarizes the process. Annexation Development Issues Meeting (DIM) --\ Pre-submittal Process --\ followed by -I Application Submittal -I Development Review and Director Recommendation --\' , , City Council Hearing followed by , / Adoption of --V Ordinance The following steps are necessary to complete an annexation application: Step 1. Annexation Development Issues Meeting (DIM) A Development Issues Meeting (DIM) is required prior to the submittal of an annexation application (SDC 5.7-120, Development Issues Meeting). The purpose of the DIM is to give an applicant the opportunity to. discuss his/her annexation proposal with City staff responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to City Council on annexation decisions. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the level of detail provided with th~ application. The goal ofthe DIM is to: ' 1. Review the annexation proposal and provide general information to an applicant related to the current capacity of surrounding public facilities and availability of key urban services in the generaL vicinity. 2. If adequate services are not available to serve the proposed annexation, the City will determine ifan opportunity for an Annexation Agreement exists. 3. Convey the submittal requirements, initiation method' and criteria for' annexation approval contained in SDC Section 5.7-100, Annexations. ' 4. Provide application forms and prepare the applicant for the pre-submittal process. I "More than half the owners of land in the territory, who also own more than half the land in the contiguous territory and of real property therein representing more than half the assessed value of all real property in the contiguous territory." (sDc:OateBecehted: DEe - 2 2008 ' Revised 10/3/08 page 1 of 5 Original Submittal Applicant Submits an Annexation DIM Application . The applicant must'submit an Annexation DIM application conforming to the DIM Submittal Requirements Checklist included with your application packet. . Staff strives to conduct the DIM within two to four weeks of receiving the application based on availability of schedule. DIMs are typically conducted every Thursday, from 1:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m: .. The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the one hour meeting. Applicant and the City Conduct the DIM . The applicant and any member of the applicant's design team who will be doing research for application submittal should attend the DIM. . The meeting is scheduled for one hour unless additional time is scheduled. . Staff attending the meeting will be prepared, to discuss' annexation issues raised in the submittal by the applicant; Other issues raised d'uring the meeting may also be discussed as time allows. The DIM is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known facilities and services. The status may change over time as conditions or standards change. ' Step 2. Pre-Submittal The purpose of the pre-submittal process is to provide an opportunity for the , property owner, applicant, and the development team to meet with City staff to determine if an application is complete for processing prior to formal submittal to the City. Key elements of the application will be reviewed, including the materials required with the annexation application packet. Staff.will make a determination of completeness at the close of the meeting. A complete application will facilitate the review process. The pre-submittal timeline and proces's are as follows. Applicant Submits an Annexation Application Packet for Pre~Submittal . The applicant must complete the materials required with the annexation application. . A pre-submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory. Staff strive to conduct pre-submittal meetings within ten to fifteen working days of receiving a pre-submittal application. Pre-submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 a.m. - noon. Date Received: DEe - 2 2008 Revised 10/3/08 Original Submitt;>1 page 2 of 5 , , , Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre-Submittal Meeting . The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre-submittal meeting. , . The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and, Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshal's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for one hour. . The planner provides the applicant with an Annexation Pre-Submittal Completeness Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complet~. The applicant will acknowledge the status of the application by signing the checklist and willi:Jave 180 days from the date of the meeting to perfe,ct and submit a complete application to the City. Alternatively, the applicant may acknowledge the incomplete status of the application by signature on the pre-submittal application and request a decision on the basis of the current submittal. Step 3, Application Submittal As noted above, an application will be deemed complete when City staff receives an acknowledged Completeness Check with a request for processing or a signed re" submittal of an annexation application with a request for processing and fees in accordance with the most recent schedule adopted by City Council. Step 4. Development Review Once an application has undergone pre-submittal proced!-,res and is accepted by the City, the application will receive a comprehensive review by the City. During the review process, the Development Review Committee (DRC) will ensure that Code requirements are complied with and will recommend approval" modification, or denial to the Director, who will forward a written recommendation to the City Council based on the approval criteria specified in SDC Section 5.7-140, Criteria. Step 5,City Council Hearing Annexation applications are reviewed under the Type IV procedure, without Planning Commission consideration consistent with the requirements of SDC Section 5.2-110, Hearing Body Jurisdiction. Notice of the public hearing is mailed, published in the newspaper, and posted consistent with the requirements of SDC Section 5.7- 130, Notice. A public hearing on the annexation request will be held by City Council. After the public hearing, the City Council may take action on the request. If Council determines additional information is needed, the annexation request can be carried forward to a future meeting. Date Received: DEe - 2 2008 " Revised 10/3/08 Original Submittal page 3 of 5 " . When considering an annexation request, the City Council must find that the annexation proposal conforms to the following criteria: " . . The annexation area is within the City's urban growth boundary and is contiguous to the city limits or separated frq,m the city only by a public right-of-way or a stream, lake, or other body of water. . The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) and any applicable refinement plans or Plan Districts. . The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be pro'vided in an orderly, efficient, and timely manner. . Where applicable, fiscal impacts to the City have been mitigated through an Annexation Agreement or other'mechanism approved by the City Council. [SDC Section 5.7-140, Criteria] If the annexation is approved by the City Council, the "UF-10 overlay zoning district (Urban Fringe) will cease to apply,and the current City zoning shall apply unless a zoning map amendment has been submitted and approved by the City [SDC Section 5.7-150, Zoning]. If the annexation is disapproved by the City Council, the proceedings end. . If the annexation area is within a water supply district or fire district, the City will process a request to withdraw the annexing territory from the water district and fire district. The withdrawal request will be proces'sed concurrently with the annexation request. If the annexation area is within Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District or Willamalane Parks and Recreation District, the annexation occurs concurrently by an intergovernmental agreement. Step 6, Adoption of Ordinance The City Council's decision on an annexation application will be by Ordinance. The Ordinance will be effective consistent with SDC Section 3"Chapter 5, and Section 5.7-155, Effective Date and Notice of Approved Annexation. The Ordinance will be mailed to the following. . Department of Revenue . Secreta ry of State . Lane County Assessment and Taxation . Lane County Elections . Affected special districts . Owners and electors as applicable in the annexation area Date, Rec.eived: DEe - 2 2008 Original Submittal Revised 10/3/08 page 4 of 5 o o m ", CD C"") I ;0 "-" CD "" 2 STEP 1 STEPS 2 AND 3 STEP 4 STEPS 5 AND 6 g ~hnexation Pre-Submittal and :' Development Review City Council Hearing "'i)e~o'pment Issues' : ,Application SUbmittal:, : and Adoption of - - - - - -. eeting..(D..IM)_ - - ~ __ _ __:_ _ _ _ _ _ __ n n _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _:_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ n _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _u_~ _ _ _ n n _ _ _ Q[dinancen _ _ _ _ _ _~_ _ _u_ , , ' . , : Applicant : : completes City Development : : annexation Review Committee : : application pre- (ORe) ensures : I : 5Ubn;ittal packet, DeV:I~~~:~~I~Ode: : pa~5he~~lec~t~r~~aff (sqC) requirements : submittal meeting are met : . . , , , . . . , .. . , , .. , . . . . . . . , , o .... cO' S' ~ en c 0- 3 ;::;: i[ . . Springfield Annexation Processing , , , , , , , , , , . . , . . , . , , , , , ., , , . . . . . , , .. , L'\BC\2001J BOuNCHANGE TRANSTTrON\APPUCATION ro~MS\SPRINGFJElD\JO_03_08 UPDATl'D FORMSIANNEXATION PACKer NARRATIVE 10-03- +.DOC , , , , , , . . , . . . , . . Applicant completes DIM application form, pays fee, City staff schedules DIM Staff and applicant meet to discuss proposal, which may include contiguity, capacity and availability of city services, affected special districts, etc. I Staff from various City departments and applicant meet to discuss proposal and determine completeness " Applicant completes outstanding items and resubmits or requests decision on application, pays fee Applicant follows up on items prior to beginning next steps; this may include an Annexation Agreement with the City -----, I City sends I DLCD 45-day I 1_ _'!2.ti~_ ~ <COG: Revised 10/3/08 City Council holds a Type IV public hearing; hears testimony and considers proposal " -- --- I Notice per I I SDC 5,]-130 I I _ _ _ _ _ '"" City Council takes action subject to second reading and adoption " Legal notice published, posted and mailed; City Council~ lea ring . schec uled Director forwards a . recommendation to the City Council to approve, deny, or modify the ' proposal Effective date of annexation per ORS 222 and Springfield Development~Code 5.7-155 Los'Saved:~mt...FI,2008 , , , , . , ." . . . . , , , , , , . page 5 of 5