The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotes, Work PLANNER 9/29/2006 .:,.\ , ~'i:(''' , ,~". TYPE II TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW", PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: McKenzie' Construction Industrial Development Project Proposal: Industrial center consisting of 2 buildings Case Number: PRE2006-00081 Project Address: Intersection of Olym'pic and 35th Street , SPRINGFIELD I ~~. . ." :,. . ,___..t Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-02-30-00 TL 2105 Zoning: HI Applicable Refinement Plan: , Mid-Springfield Refinement Plan Designation: HI Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: September 29, 2006 Application Submittal Deadline: March 28, 2007 Associated Applications: None noted. > CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM I POSITION I Proiect Manaqer I Transportation Planninq Enqineer I Public Works Civil Enqineer I Public Works EIT I Deputy Fire Marshall I Communitv Services Manaqer . REVIEW OF Planninq Transportation Uti I iti es . Sanitarv &,Storm Sewer Fire and, Life Safetv . Buildinq APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM I NAME David Reesor Garv McKennev Eric Walter Matt Stouder Gilbert Gordon Dave Puent Applicant Will Akins McKenzie Taylor Construction 4660 Main Street, Suite 150 Sprinqfield, OR 97478-4003 Engineer; Ronald D. Rice, P.E. Geomax; Inc. -806 N. 9th Street Cottaqe '.Grove. OR " 9/29/06 I. I PHONE 726-3783 I 726-4585 736-1034 736-1035 726-2293 726-3668 r' .-" , SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST , PLANNING o Application Fee'discuss the-applicable fees o One additional copy of the Site Plan reduced to 81!2"x II" . . ~ Complete Incomplete See Notes ffi3 l5J. 8 1f2"x 11" Copy of Site Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 60 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances: If the applicant is not the property . owner, written permission from the property owner i~,required. Complete Incomplete RJtl ~ See Notes Ij]~ ""'11!1 &,,%i~."'~?_'-l , C0'-~!fWiM o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See' Notes [?Jill_ Ifil Ifil /i'!dl ~ ~ [?Jill_, Ifil ~- ~ ,~_ Ifil 9/29/06 " ~ ~ . :1 Deed and Preliminary Title Report Prepared by an Qregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect or Engineer Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks , from property, lines, distance between buildings Location and height of existing or proposed fences, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs , ' Loc;ation, dimeri'sions and number of typicai, compact and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs and striping , Lot coverage calculations of all parking and _ vehicular' areas On-site loading-areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation .. , Location of on-site exterior lighting Location, 'type and number of bicycle parking spaces . Location of existing and proposed transit facilities . 2 Phased Development Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase, Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating. other required public improvements, including but not limited to sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being,submitted. Complete Incomplete See Notes RJtl ~ o Landscape Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ffi-'_-?" _:3w ncr-'&--.-,' *?"'-_ *.Y~'O- __ ~ Ij] ~- ijil lliIiJ Ij] ~ Notes: Phased Development Pian . b' Location and dimensions of landscaping and open . space areas to Include calculation of landscape , coverage ' .: Vegetative screening in accordance with SDC Section 31.160 Written description, including specifications of the permanent irrigation system . Location and type of street trees List in chart form the proposed types of landscape , materials (trees~ shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, , size, spacing and method of planting If there are any transit facilities adjacent to the site, they need to be shown on the Site Plan Map: I Additional comments not related to the comple,teness of the application: ',;" The title of the Site Plan indicates thatthe applicant is proposing a subdivision, This appears to be a mistake and should be corrected to show it not as a proposed subdivision. " ' .;.. It would also be helpful to show an applicable legend on each individual sheet, . .;.. Sheet 1 of 7 was a bit confusing to review..It is labeled "Existing Conditions," but shows the proposed development on the site. This should be changed to only show the existing conditions,;' . ;.. Tne surrounding properties located to the south and to the west of the subject 'property' are'labeled as "Commercial Zone." These surrounding properties are in fact zoned Heavy Industrial, the same zone, as the subject property.. These changes should be noted on the newly submitted Site Plan. 9/29/06 '3 9/29/06 ;.. Because the proposed developmer:Jt is located within the 5 year TOTZ, the applicant will be required to apply for a DW~ Overlay District Application, Options may be discussed if these units are'to be rentals. Given the location in the 5 year TOTZ, the proposed gravel outdoor storage are'as may have to be paved, depending upon what they will be storing, The area with proposed parking (if in fact used for parking) will have to also be paved. ." . It " j' . " 'I,. 4 P/2EZt>o/i-OO(' V -, /YIek(?N~{€.:rlI-j/~1Z- ' ~/2.q/rJh ~. /W~€Nl'ley , SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST TRANSPORTATION ~.. '. . tl'y Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has /' frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ ~ Let- Ill. ~ ,,,,- ,,-, . 'Copy of ROW approach Permit Application 1-1 } .0raffic Impact Study-four copies of a study prepiared by a Tra~c Engineer in . /' accordance with SDC Section 32.020(1)(c). Traffic Impact Studies (TIA) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the . City's transportation system. In general,'a TIA must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic' operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIA must also address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete See Notes .111 Ij! 1iEJ...'." ~ o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ ~) Iji i1I Traffic Impact S~udy Access to. streets, alleys and properties to be served, , including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts. proposed to be closed o Improvement and ~ublic Utilities Plan " Complete Incomplete See Notes Iii.iiil Illill ~ III I1ZI ~ mi' ~ ~ IYl [S' ~ ~,... Il.:F- ,"'>..1:1 Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting . Location, widths and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of- ways within or adjacent to the proposed development Location of existing and required traffic control devices 7:>0 NOr "1'pl4::'J7'l& to to "1/.Itzee ~/~ P;t2LVewHfs SfZ w;rf21CI/N reD. 4 7/21/04 i~ SITE PLAN REVIEW APpLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete Incomplete See Notes !IIl1Bll ~lB Wi! IWiI_ ~- -.,- ~ Ii'iil ~ ~ i;-;;<:I!iilL_ ~~ Wi! ~ ~ ltI Prepared by an Oregon licensed . Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map The name.. location and dimensions of' all existing site features including buildings~ curb cuts,. trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed Required setbacks to the proposed new property lines for existing structures to remain on site The name; location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on,the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Departmeht The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Article 17 of the Springfield Development Code arid delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department milD ~- ~ ~~lI?f.f }A~-:'~ 1 :;': ljl 1~1!li!f. ~~ Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 112 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Articles 31 and 32 and must include the following' information: Complete Incomplete I&'r._ ~~ ~- ~ ~ ~ @il ~ @!l ~ ~ See Notes fljjilj,'l~ ~, . Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer ~_ All existing and proposed easements 1""1_1 ~~ ~d ", . o Grading and Paving Plan Complete. Incomplete See Notes ~. :5'l!l' 1. ~ '~.0 - . .-- .. ~ ~~ ~~ }.",A.' ..' -~~, ~- ijijI ~ ~ ~ [I] ~ ~ Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and trails Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer Planting pli3n prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations ~f:Ii!a Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size arid location of stormwater , management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or ~- Irnl.~1 ~ i~N'" ~ detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained ~_ Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) 'I~I.~ Amount of proposed cut and fill fiI o Stormwater ManagementSystem'Study-four copies of a study with the completed stormwaterScoping Sheet attached. The plan, supporting calculations and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete See Notes '~ ~.. Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study Notes: 1. The sheet labeled existing site conditions currently shows ,what looks like the proposed plan. 2. FEMA flood zone needs to be notated on the existing site condition sheet, 3. Existing site condition sheet incomplete, 4. Please notate water table for site soils, 5. Could not locate Electric. 6. , Storm water treatment is required for 50% of the non- building rooftop impervious area (3.03.4.E Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures). Also, Parking is not allowed on aggregate surfacing as indicated on the area at the east end of the property. 7. Cut/fill is indicated in the narrative, but needs to be notated on the plans. 8. ,Storm waterscoping sheet missing. Additional Items not related to the completeness of the applicant: 1. Trash areas will need to be covered and plumbed to the sanitary sewer. -- (;' 'If :+ G', Il p~- 5w&...~d,1 ~"-'';.,9 '-- p~, f:2(JcX,.1Oa?'i5/ t.J,li'Ur"''5//'''-l<ek~;<. I ~ oe::o.....~ '-..J s t1/~ ke . '--DiA<~q,;J [)er~~ ~~:.:", N~7L", I " OIf-<ft'. 3~ -sf" - '7/ZO,/Ofo _(/<<-<-- SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION , PRE-SUBMITTAL CJ-iECKLIST FIRE o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ On-site vehicular circulation __ III o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~" ;5 .::,.' R'il ~ R'il ~ Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities Notes: Additional Comments not related to the completeness of the application: , ' I . /J-~F~ ~ t;~tJo'-/ ' 'rJ ~' /~ 0(0'::'. ( - /5;7(JlO -;rW -tyfe7f- ~~-I:~ ~ .:?, r;so 14-/~5~ V'-l;~- - rtw~- ZhO<-<--3._ 71/<'5 ~--u?lu-:,,! 3~-.-I:- ~. ' ?-jf?Dh,-lafd~ ~.C I05'.j... , . ()~l-;~M"_jJ -7S-Z~~ ',~~~U~ ~~~_~~o~~~.:__~_ ;'P!~- ?Iu./~~-~~ 'I'Oid ,~;l-'~ '~~.-e.~~ LJ ~~11 ~O~L.(/OS T~ 7ost./ &'~JSFC, ~tdhj<< [) /O'v. ? ,- /. - :l- IS~ J/IA--'- ;1.[1 " ,~il, ~aIJ ~u~ ' 1'::_, ~.c'OO /h~, '~ ,;(t:()15Fc 5"0:;, ?: I 5P(J'!I~LJtjJ(6;J,1 " I ' 11 ., 3, /1~0~-~jJJL!J~~ " ~~'tl-J~ Loci ~}!~ (131 /'jr. 51-' ' 7'-/r-u 713~', ' ' ) - ' '-/ f1h_.~La~~ 11. J- .,' L_ LJlf/-Rt/J5F,C1;;:;,;[;'/i ~A~~~,;J , , r;;:;~~~ L,' , r-(---r 6_~ J: l-ddf~~ -:L~. dO/~ ;4,~f3~ .5P( .50'3, C, /. , ' ANY. REQUIRED ADDITIONALMATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO 1HE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETIi\lG OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Applicable ~ IW ~ Proposed deed restrictions anp a draft of any Homeowner's Association.Agreement ' Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster' Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC Section 16.100(3) " Ripariar:J Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of wQLW A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area is within an overlay district applicable, address the additional standards of the overlay' district ' If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC Article 38 A wetland deline'ation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted con'currently where there is a wetland on the property i Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review :! ~ ~ IW . u=1 ~ RJtl l!?Ej CiQ ~ ~, ~ Ij] ~ III ~ Ij] ,~ ~ ~ IW ~. Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land.and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted with the land use application Where applicable, any Discretionary Use, Variance or Modification of Provisions as specified in SDC Article 10 or 11 , ' ~ ~ 9/29/06 13 THIS APPLICATION IS: o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING .. ' ~INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE' -<17~~ - ;? -2-7 - tJ{ , Date' City Planner This is not a decisi~n on your application. Springfield Development Code Sections 3.050(3)-(6) and Oregon RevisedStatutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete, The 120- day processing period for this application begins, when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a w~itten response to the City within seven days ofthe date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response the missing. information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre-Submittal Review to provide the City w.ith the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application comple'te for purposes of starting the 120- day Clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120~day period unless accompanied by a, request for an extension of the 120-day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The 'City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the 180-day timeline. ~d~ owner/ Applii:ant"'s ,Signature --...... - '. 9/29/06 14