Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Meeting PLANNER 10/30/2008 (2) CHURCH DIM PRJ 2008-00057 The following information is based upon the Marcola Meadows Master Plan conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission on December 20, 2007. Please refer to the approved Final Master Plan application for additional information: 1. Master Plan Condition of Approval #4: "Prior to Fina] Master Plan approval, the applicant shall prepare a deed restriction to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and Development Services Director stating that the applicant or successor owners shall address basic underlying assumptions approved by the Planning Commission when applying for a Master Plan modification as specified in SDC Section 5. ]3.135." At the public hearing held on November 20, 2007, the Planning Commission approved the following topics as Master Plan basic underlying assumptions: streets, nodal requirements, land uses, phasing, stormwater management, sanitary sewers and grading. All of these basic underlying assumptions shall be addressed as part of the Master Plan Modification application required below. 2. Master Plan Condition of Approval #6: "Prior to Final Master Plan approval, the applicant shall prepare a deed restriction' to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and the Development Services Director that states: any change in the mix of housing units, any change in the location of housing types, or any increase in the 518 residential dwelling units shown on the approved Final Master Plan by the applicant or successor owners shall require a Master Plan modification as specified in SDC Section 5.13.-135." The applicant proposes to remove 5 acres of land reserved for housing which will have a major impact regarding approved housing types (the number of single- family vs. townhouses) and densities (a residential density of not less than 12 dwelling units per acre is required). Therefore, this proposal will require a Master Plan Modification application, a Type III (Planning Commission) review process. 3. Master Plan Condition of Approval #8: "Prior to Final Master Plan approval, the applicant shall evaluate and address to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director any open space requirement conflicts between SDC Section? 3.2-230 and 3.2-240. The more strict open space standards shall apply to the proposed townhouses. The results of this evaluation shall be made part of a deed restriction approved by the DE!velopment Services Director and the City Attorney. The applicant shall also calculate all required open space for the MDR portion of the site to demonstrate that the open space standard can be met and how the o'pen space standards will' be addressed in the Phasing Plan over the life of the Master Plan." The proposed development will impact the amount of residential open space required. This issue will need to be addressed during the Master Plan Modification application review process. 4. Master Plan Condition of Approval #9: "Prior to Final Master Plan approval, the applicant shall prepare a deed restriction to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and the Development Services Director that states: no proposed residential structure shall exceed the 35-foot maximum height standard specified in SDC 3.2-215." The proposed development shows a 68 foot-high steeple. This issue will need to be addressed during the Master Plan Modification application review process. 5. Master Plan Condition of Approval #10: "Prior to Final Master Plan approval, the applicant shall prepare a deed restriction to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and the Development Services Director that states the applicant or successor owners shall agree that the design of the uniform fence along the north property line that abuts the EWES EasemenVSike Path shall be as shown in revised Attachment 2, Design Guidelines." The applicant shall comply with the uniform fence requirement cited above. 6. Master Plan Condition of Approval #20: "Prior to Final Master Plan approval, the applicant shall prepare a deed restriction to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and.the Development Services Date Received' I () - J 0 Planner: SH Director that states that the applicant and successor owners shall submit Site Plan Review applications that comply with the approved Final Master Plan." 111 addition to a Master Plan Modification application, the applicant shall also submit a Discretionary Use application for a church in a residential zoning district and a Site Plan application that complies with the requirement cited above. 7. Master Plan Condition of Approval #29: "Direct vehicular driveway access to 28'h/31" Streets shall not be shown on the final Marcola Meadows Master Plan. The number, location and design of such driveways, if any, shall be determined during the subdivision and/or site plan review process for specific developments within the Marcola Meadows Master Plan area" The Preliminary Master Plan showed driveways along 28'h/31st Streets. These driveways were not shown on the Final Master Plan. The Subdivision Tentative Plan did not show driveways along 28th/31st Streets. Driveway access to/from the proposed development either on 28th/31st Streets or Oak Prairie Drive must be determined by City transportation staff. 8. Master Plan Condition of Approval #30: "Prior to the approval of the Final Master Plan, the applicant shall record a deed restriction to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and the Development Services Director stating that the applicant and successor owners shall adhere to the approved Street Tree List." The required Site.Plan application shall comply with the requirement cited above. 9. . Master Plan Condition of Approval #51: "Prior to the submitt~l of the Final Master Plan, the applicant shall submit the Phasing Plan conceptually agreed to by staff and the applicant on December 18, 2007, which provides a logical phasing proposal. The Phasing Plan may require additional modification to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director and the Public Works Director." The applicant proposes to remove 5 acres of land reserved for housing. This . proposal will require a revised phasing plan. ) I Date Received: / D . 36 Planner: SH