Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, Pre PLANNER 1/14/2008 , " PRE-SUBMIl :.aAL DISTRIBUTION LIST: Date Distributed: I~N-a vi Dave Puent - Building V'/ Gilbert GordonlMelissa Fechtel- Fire /; Gary McKenney - Traffic ' , Matt Stouder - Public Works/Engineering Les Benoy - Public Works/Engineering Dennis Ernst/Jon Driscoll, Surveying , , Planner. " ~tL, City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 541-725-3753 Phone 541-726-3689 Fax Pre-Submittal Meeting Case Number Assigned: PRE2008-00004 ' Date Submitted: 1/11/2008 APPLICANT: CLEARSPAN TRUSS. 955 N MAIN INDEPENDEN OR 97351 Proiect Name: CLEARSP AN TRUSS SPR COMM ST, Project Description: ' Pre-Submittal for Site Plan Review for truss manufacturer on the north side of Commercial Street Application Type: Site Plan Review Job Address: 3290 COMM~RCIAL AVE 1702312100800 . ~ Assessor's & Tax Lot #: DISCLAIMER: ApplicatiOlis will not be exempt from Development Code or procedural amendments that may oc~ur between the time of the Pre-Submittal Meeting and Submittal of the Application for Development Review, Please contact our office at 541-726-3753'with any questions or concerns, , A Planner will be assigned the following business day and will contact you to cO,nfirm the meeting date and time. PlanJobPrint.rpt 1111/2008 2:08:20PM PRE-SllBMITTAl REC'D JAN 1 1 2008 ,. Pre-Submittal.Meeting Development Services Department Room 615/616 PRE-SUB MITT AL MEETING DATE: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1. PRE-SUBMITTAL MTG #PRE2008-00004 (SITE TENT) CLEARSP AN TRUSS Assessor's Map: 17-02-31-21 TL800 Address: Commercial Avenue Existing Use: Vacant Applicant submitted plansto construct two flew industrial buildings for Clearspan Truss. A 12,600 sq ft truss manufacturing plant, 1,500 sq ftoffice and lumber storage building: Meeting Dateffime: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 DSD 616 11:00,- noon Planner: Steve Hopkins " City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 PRE-SUBMrllAL REC'O JAN 1 1 2008 Site Plan Application, Type II . , !II "'!k " "'. J: . . ,'." . .. '. ,;.. ~.'a',' .." .' _'~ ":'011' .-" Application1:ype:,-:' *.," " :,"i;'::,;"(AiijJlicant:"checkone) , '" ';' ,-,",..,~:~/:; ... , ". . ~ '. _ .... 1 . . , ..c. I.... Site Plan Review: 1Zl Major Site Plan Major Modification D Applicant Name: \tL J, 1<[')0"l\rJ 5u3183f-C,(!"'f Company: Ct~N2f:.PA('( T~", T",c- [Fax: SoJhBe.M I Co, Addre'ss: q,<:,,, IV, JV\A/N'.,~, /NI7I/h'i17mce:.,,' OL q9:;J,,)'! A~Plicant's Rep.: I Oi~o., 1 (<AM'" ~ (s," 71' {viM'" J. ') Ip~one: (s"1! )3lH - ')7 ')0 Company:' [ IFa~: (s4d4S..s2S3 Address: [lSD Q 51" Sk z"o:> "~r.;".,t'J<U CR, '17411 I pro~'~rty Owner: I . ' "" I I Phone: I I Company: [1205 S I/'IVI..5TiY1reNTS, T,/~, I Fax: I . I Address: "3 (" I 0 ("'M"P~-n..et .If.~ PAJr"f.,Hi..ML 97<10 I [ 't,", ;:,:~.',,;., .', ,. , < -'. "j~ "". . . ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 11- en - ~ i -1..; TAX LOT NO(s): 91:'0 Property Address: 3.)..QO C()W\l'\.\Lr-c.I.-a(f'\ve. Size of Property: 4. 3'" Acres ~ Square Feet D Proposed Name of Project: , . 'Cle"'r;1f~o'\ t;v',~ I),"lic~'''l'''''' Description of tvt!'u 'fVv~S .......wJ~...~ r-4~"Li~, Proposal: # of Lots/Parcels: Avg, Lot/Parcel Size: New l"!1pervious Surface Coverage: ,(, J, D'" Z-, sf ct- ",Ii:,. ,-, -"!'-:.,-,,-, c'-'.', sf Density: Bldg. Gross Floor, Area: ','- 'y; ....~ :' . , '. - " d uj acre (4,~o() sf '. . Overlay District: Plan Designation: Urban Growth Boundary 0 [ Zoning: Applicable Refinement Plan: Location: City Limits 0 Associated Applications: Pre-Submittal / . Case No.: PK ;;0ClZ..:.1Rl-Y~1 Date: I //t (0<6 Case No.: Date: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ TOTAL FEE'S. $ Reviewed by: Reviewed by: Postage Fee: +uv?- I $ I I Updated 12/8/2006 Brenda Jones \~~ I (,1- /~~ F'v- \ 251.Y6-- D9iJ (" v j/l 0---0 Steps in the Process: PRE-SUBMiTTAL REC'D JAN 1 1 2008 1. The Applicant Submits a Pre-Submittal Meeting Application The Pre-Submittal Application is mandatory, Please refer to the Springfield Fee Schedule for the Pre-Submittal Application fee, The submittal package must conform to the application completeness checklist attached to this form. You are required to submit Nine (9) copies of the submittal req!Jirements packet for pre-submittal review. Pre-submittal meetings will be conducted every Tuesday and Friday between 10:00 am and noon. We will strive to conduct the Pre-Submittal meeting within five to seven working days of receiving the application. 2. Applicant and the City conduct the Pre-Submittal Meeting We strongly encourage you, the owner and design team to attend the Pre-Submittal meeting, The meeting will be held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division. The meeting will be scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. The Planner will provide you with a Pre-Submittal Checklist at the end of the meeting specifying the items required to make the application complete-if it isn't already complete. You will then have 180 days to make the application complete for submittal and acceptance by the City, 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application When you have addressed all of the items on the Pre-Submittal Checklist, please submit 18 copies of the complete application to the City, A fee will be collected at that time and the 120 day calendar review period will begin. When the Planner has prepared a draft land use decision, the draft will be mailed/faxed to the applicant/owner/design team for their review, At the applicant's request, the planner will schedule a meeting to review the draft with appropriate staff if certain issues need resolution before the final land use decision is issued. Owner's Signature This application will be used for both the required Pre-Submittal Meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner's signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's signature will not be accepted. ~/ Case Number: (.>yt "UDY\- ('j1gJf{ Date Submitted: The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre-Submittal Meeting. Owner: ~, Signatu e Date: . / ..2~~ :];9 !o 8 , ~i"'N'f'LJ. Print h oflpl) i+N Updated 12/8/2006 Brenda Jones ,Ol/10(~ THU 07:58 FAX 541 687 1198 Q111012005 08:05 FAX ,_, VALLEY RIVER VIL 141 002 Iji] 002/002 City of Springfield 25 NOIth St!l Springfield, Or 97477 PRE-SUBMlTIP't R~C'D JAN 1 1 Z008 RE: Map 18-02-31-21. TIIX Lot 800 . PlanningIPublie Works I hereby give Dan Korgan and/or Randy Sanders, or their designees and Clear Span Truss Inc, permission 10 "Pply to the City of Springfield for prelimimlIY approvallo improve the undeveloped parcel identified as Tal( 101800, Map 17,02-31-21. ' I am the legal owner of the referenced propetty and the above referenced indivlduals currently are under contract with a purchase &. Sale Agreement to purchase ihe property. The title to, the ~ropetty is vested in the name of Ross Inve.stmenlS, Inc. as evidenced by Preliminary Title Reponprep!ll'ed by evergreen Land Title Compauy, report # 54343 dated November 2. 2007. If you have any questionS or need additional infonnation regarding this issue, please advise ASAP a.5 time is of the essence. I want these indiViduals to accomplisb their acquisition under the afore mentioned PSA and to do so they need prelin'linary approval from the City of Springfield, It is understood that this permission is nece55llIY 10 continue the process. . Thank You ~~ . , Ross Murry Ross ltivestments Ine 3610 Goodpasture Island Rd Rugene, OR 97401 541-687-1196 541-687-1198 (fax) 01/10/08 THO 07:5J (!!(RX NO 7lSS1 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP PRE2008-00004 Commercial Avenue . SITE Map 17-02-31-21 Tax Lot 800 North ... ~~-r~~ 1'-' , , 1\ m '" , -Ii Ii . ~U T'" II IIij ~i ~I ~ 0+ " )' coil ~. "II , 11111111111111 B liB I I I I I I I I I I II in, luH~ Ii i i g ilalammi~!;mii = ~ - u!llal'IX!11 !> !1I11'U. iiI! .. -, IiS!Ui~a' ~1i';~lm ,.:..... 11;:1 AilllllSII .... II':' Ill! nil;:! ::; ;:I;:lEW_., ~ iJlii~i i ~ -~ ftEvrSIONS 1 DAn;; "....- ~ . _~_M ,"._ == =~ t.D2,{)[T} .... N [Tl n".,.wtD~' -l ""'"wrn.. .............., ~, ====--.....- Site Development Plan for Clearspan Truss Inc. ;' CUlf 01 Sprl.ngfWhl. Lruw Counlll Oregon f ,- ;;:1 if I f ltl. r. r i'l' ' I I I I I I , I L-- I I I I , , I , , 1---- , , II I ~ I ~: , I r "I ,- (i' c::: ,'1- s,;;; ~ I , , 1------ ~ . R j ~ --1 T ~ . I'.!\ ~ ~s,..... Olson & Morris :aasr.__ -.u... lI..t '~Coll_ fII:(!l<II_m3 - Clll$llltinc EnghlefT1 &:SIl1\~ .~...\ ;\~:: fr"'J"; -- '.:,:,,) 1> "', 'oj :z: '''' l--l :;..:~~, ~...."'l ~ M_!i~.:~ f"-.,;) r....... Cl C) ~ <Xl f:rJ n d OLSON & MloRRllS A division of L.B. Olson & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers Land Surveyors Urban Planners 380 Q Street Suite 200 Springfield, Oregon 97477 (541) 302-9790 Fax: (541) 485-3253 : olsonandmorris,com . SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION FOR CLEARS PAN TRUSS PRE-SUBMIIT~l REC'D JAN 1 1 2008 Property Owner! Applicant: Clearspan Truss, Inc 955 North Main Street Independence, OR 97351 Tel (503) 838-6896 Project Coordinator/ Applicant's Representative/ Engineering: Olson & Morris c/o Scott Morris, PE 380 Q Street, Suite 200 Springfield, OR 97477 Tel (541) 302-9790 Planning: Metro Planning, Inc. c/o Robert Stevens, AICP 370 Q Street Springfield, OR 97477 Tel (541) 302-9830 I 7-02~3 1-21 Assessor's ,Map: Tax Lot: 800 (Portion North of Commercial Avenue) Zoning: HI (Heavy Industrial) Plan Designation: Heavy Industrial' Area: 179,543 Square Feet (4.12 Acres) Backl!round This application is for Site Plan Review approval for two new industrial buildings and associated parking loUutilities for Clearspan Truss. .Clearspan Truss is a company based in Independence, Oregon that manufactures trusses for all types of buildings (i.e. residential, commercial). The company will be constructing a 12,600 square foot truss manufacturing plant, 1,500 square foot office, and lumber storage building on a portion of this development property. The remainder of the property will. be undeveloped and reserved for future development potential. Clearspan Truss Site Plan Review January 11, 2008 Page I The subject site for this proposed development is zoned HI (Heavy Industrial), The proposed Clearspan Truss building will have frontage and access on Commercial Avenue. This proposed development will only be located on the portion of the subject tax lot on the north side of Commercial Avenue, ' This written statement provides a narrative response addressing compliance with the industrial zone standards at SDC Section 3.2-400, the Site Plan Review approval criteria found in Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.17- 125, In this written statement references are made to some of the sheets in the attached plan set. The following is the order of the sheets in the plan set. I Sheet No, IC1 IC2 ,IC3 IC4 IC5 IC6 le7 ICB ICg IE1 Sheet Name Site Assessment Plan Site Development Plan Site Gradin9. Plan Site Pavin9. Plan Site Utilitv Plan IStorm Drainaqe Study I Land Drainaqe Alteraiion Plan iCiVil Details I Buildinq Elevations Comoliance with Zonin~ The proposed development meets the development standards for the HI zone per SDC 3.2-420. , . The existing lot is 4.12 acres in size; which already far exceeds the minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. There is 407.39 feet offrontage oil Commercial Avenue; which exceeds the minimum staridard of 75 feet. The proposed manufacturing building will be setback from Commercial Avenue about 98 feet and the storage building will be setback about 81 feet. Both of these front yard setbacks exceed the minimum of 10 feet. In addition, the smallest setback from the front lot line to the 'parking lot is 20 feet; which exceeds the minimum of5 feet. Only the adjacent property to the west is zoned for residential uses. The other adjacent properties are industrial zoned parcels. The lumber storage building will be setback from the residential parcel to the west by about 25 feet to meet the minimum 10 foot interior yard setback. On the west and east boundaries of the development site there will be at least a 5 foot planted buffer to meet the minimum 5 foot interior yard setback for parking lots. None of the other development standards ofSDC Section 3,2-400 apply to HI zoned parcels. Based on the above facts, the development standards of SDC 3.2-420 are met and the new Clearspan Truss facility will be consistent with the HI zoning designation. SDC 5.17-125 Site Plan Review Aooroval Criteria A. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram, and/or the applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. The Metro Plan, Land Use Diagram designates the property as appropriate for Heavy Industrial. The Mid-Springfield Refinement Plan Diagram also designates the property for Clearspan Truss Site Plan Review January I I, 2008 Page 2 PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O JA,N 1 1 2008 Heavy Industrial uses, These plan designations are consistent with the current zoning of HI (Heavy Industrial). Per SDC 3.2-410, in the HI zone manufacturing and administrative, professional, and business offices are permitted uses, The Clearspan. Truss facility will manufacture building trusses and there will be an administrative office attached to the ' manufacturing plant. Given that the Clearspan Truss facility. will be engaged in HI zone permitted uses; this site plan review application will be consistent with the Metro Plan and Mid-Springfield Refinement Plan heavy industrial plan designation. B. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. The existing public improvements including the 27" wastewater line, 12"/36" storm drainage system, and Commercial Avenue are already constructed. Other utilities (i.e, electric, water, phone, and gas) are also already constructed and stubbed to the existing lot. These utilities are located within either the existing 7 foot PUE (public utility easement) located along the entire frontage of Commercial Avenue adj acent to the proposed development or within one of two existing utility easements located on the west and east property'boundaries. There are already curb, gutter, and street lights on Commercial A venue. There are no traffic control devices (i.e. traffic lights) near the subject site. The nearest traffic control devices are located at the intersection of Main and 32nd Streets. In addition, street trees are already installed on the north side of Commercial Avenue adjacent to the proposed manufacturing facility. These existing public improvements are shown on the attached plan set drawings, The existing sanitary and storm sewer lines that the proposed private lines will tap into are very adequate for handling the anticipated demand from this type/intensity of development proposed with this site plan review application. . The project engineer at Olson & Morris has carefully sized the private utilities to handle the anticipated water discharge volumes. The pertinent calculations to demonstrate that the proposed private utilities and existing public improvements have the capacity to handle the disch~ge are included on Sheet C3 (Utility Plan) and C6 (Storm Drainage Study). To accommodate the pre-treatment of stormwater, the on-site runoff will either be piped into' catch basins containing fossil filters or outfall into one of three bio-swales, After pre- treatment the stormwater drainage will be piped to the existing storm lines in Commercial Avenue. The stormwater management plan involves the use of a connected system of private drain pipes. , All proposed utility lines and connections are delineated on the attached utility plan, Clearspan Truss Site Plan Review January II, 2008 Page 3 ICO"C- ~..~\ <'=l"l REC''''u. t.br(~..{A1t~~\n\! ,~ JAN 1 1 Z008 C. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. The public improvements necessary to serve the proposed development are already constructed and located within the Commercial Avenue right-of-way or to the west of the subject site, The applicant is proposing to construct private improvements that conriect to the existing public improvements. Both utility and grading plans (sheets C3 and C5) are included with this site plan review application. The private improvements include the . proP9sed private utilities/parking lot necessary to accommodate the new Clearspan Truss facility: All of the private design and construction standards of this code are complied with in regards to the private improvements. Please refer to the aforementioned plan sheets for applicable details. D. Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residentiaI.areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. The existing public street network, Commercial Avenue, provides sufficient and safe vehicular access to nearby streets 30th Street and 35th Street These two streets (3oth and 35th) provide access to Main Street and Olympic Street The residential parcels to the west can be easily accessed from along 30th Street In addition, 32nd Avenue intersects Commercial Avenue adjacent to the proposed manufacturing plant Thirty-Second (32nd) Avenue provides access into the surrounding residential neighborhood to the south. On 30th Street there is also access to commercial services on Main Street and the new DMV office on 30th Street. The development site is within an area that has good connectivity with nearby residential, commercial, and industrial areas. There is presently one 38 foot driveway that will continue to provide access to the development site. To facilitate easy access for vehicles, especially large trucks, a second 35 foot driveway is being proposed. Both driveways will allow for efficient site circulation to reach the buildings and all areas of the parking lot efficiently. The proposed parking area on the subj ect property has been designed and constructed to ensure vehicular and pedestrian circulation remains safe and convenient The parking lot design conforms to the dimensional requirements ofSDC 4.6-1 15. The parking space dimen~ions are shown on the attached plans. The parking lot will be paved, as required, and the stormwater run-off from the parking lot will flow through one of three bio-swales or catch basins containing fossil filters. The bio-swales will be located within the landscaped setbacks along the south and east property lines, The parking lot will also be clearly striped to indicate pedestrian crossings and parking spaces, Regarding the minimum number of parking spaces, an office use requires I space per 300 square feet and manufacturing requires I space per 500 square feet This results in a minimum number of require'd spaces being thirty (30). There are 32 spaces being provided to meet the required minimum standard, Regarding bicycle parking spaces, there is a requirement with manufacturing that there be I space per 3000 square feet In Clearspan Truss Site Phln Review January II, 2008 page;4 ~-.r"~ ;~;;, r\lL"~:;'; REC'D Jf,\.N 1 1 2008 addition, 25% must be short-term and 75% long-term spaces. The rriinimum number of bicycle parking spaces is 5 and 5. spaces are being provided. Four of these spaces will be long-term, ' The parking lot and ingress-egress points meet the applicable requirements of the SOC and thus this criterion is satisfied, E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas; wetlands; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. There are no physical features on the subject property; this includes trees, shrubs,. watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings, or historic features. Given the absence of any physical features on the site; this criterion is not applicable. This proposed Clearspan Truss facility on Commercial A venue c1earlv meets all aooroval criteria of the Sorim!fieJd Oevelooment Code, The applicant respectfully requests that the Planning Director approve this site plan review application. If there are any questions about this written statement, please do not hesitate to contact me at Metro Plann'ing via email (robertw)metroolannin,?,col1l) or phone (541-302-9830). For questions relating to the project in general, please contact the project coordinator/engineer. Respectfully, , Scott Morris, PE Olson & Morris (Project Coordinator) Robert Stevens, AICP Metro Planning, Inc .' Clearspan Truss Site Plan Review January 11 ,2008 Page 5