The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutComments PLANNER 1/22/2008 ~ , :City of Springfield " Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Partition Project Name: c1earspan Project Proposal: industrial development Case Number: pre2008-00004 Project Address: commercial ave Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-02-31-21 tl800 Zoning: High Industrial (HI) Overlay District(s): Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Applicable Refinement Plan: Mid-Springfield Refinement Plan Designation: High Industrial (HI) Metro Plan Designati.on: High Industrial (HI) Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: January 22, 2008 Application Submittal, Deadline: July 22, 2008 Associated Applications: DWP I CHYOF SPRINGFIEl:Dj[)EVELOPMEN;J; REVIEW TE~M I POSITION REVIEW OF I Proiect Planner Land Use Planninq I Transportation Planninq Enqineer Transportation I Public Works CiviLEnqineer Utilities I Sanitary & Storm Sewer I Deputy Fire Marshal Fire and Life Safety I Communitv Services Manaqer Buildinq APPUC::ANT'S: ()EVELOPM ENT' REVIEW TEAM Revised 10{25{07 NAME Steve Hopkins Garv McKennev Matt Stouder Gilbert Gordon Dave Puent PHONE 726-3649 726-4585 736-1035 726-2293 726-3668 'LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application fee - discuss the applicable fees o Copy of the Land Division Plan reduced to 8'h"x.11" Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ D 8 '/," x 11" Copy of Land Division Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances, . If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required, Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ D Deed and Preliminary Title Report o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken, . Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ D Brief Narrative o Land Division Tentative Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ D ~ ~ D Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with ORS 92 City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the property Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the property Boundaries of the entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale [g] ~ D Revised 10{25{07 2 'f?EJ D ~ D [g] D ~ D ~ ~ D D ~ D [g] D [g] D Location, widths and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division., Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities Location of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and area of illumination Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways Location of existing and proposed transit facilities ' Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and bike trails Location, size, and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition, or limitation's of the reserva'tions clearly indicated .Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV, Indicate the proposed connection points, o Future Development Plan where phasfng or large lots/parcels are proposed ~s specified in SDC 5,12-120 E, Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) D D Planning Notes: Revised 10{25{07 Future Development Plan 3 1. An application for the Drinking Water Protection Overlay is required concurrently with the site plan review, 2. Need cut sheets for outdoor lights, They must have full cutoffs and be directed downward, 3. -:J: ivn d Ie ~;,",p..l..:. ~i.. k:;-,;. . Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . Please be aware of the new SDC and application forms, . the site review fee will be based on 75,923 sf of impervious surface, \ / , Revised 10/25/07 4 ,. 'ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANTS RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Applicable ~ D D D D D D D ~ 0 0 D D CJ D D ~ [J o ,D D 0 D EJ Revised 10/25/07 " Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230 'Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 ' feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5,19-100 A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5,7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer. All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5,9-100 and 5,21-100, 5 THIS APPLICATION IS: o 9>MPLETE FOR PROCESSING {d'INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE 0'~ City Planner /IlL l/&clo&b D'ate ' This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227,178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete, The 120-day processing period for-this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information, You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information, If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre- Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information, If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of th'e full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the' application complete for purposes of starting the 120-day clock and begin processing the application, No new information may be submitted a,fter the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day processing time, Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time, The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after, the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information 'substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the ISO-day timeline. JL It.o''J''- I / 'Z-i 108 Date ./ n,,- D4'" Owrier/ Applicant's Signature Revised 10{25{07 6 -, 'lAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Transportation Engineer: Jon Driscoll Case#: PRE2008-00004 Applicant: Daniel Korgan (Clearspan Truss) TRANSPORTATION o Right~of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportatiol) (ODOT) facility, Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ li;jJ l22U Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application " o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4,2-105 AA.. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system, In gederal, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in.terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and. immediate and adjoining street systems, A TIS must also address, if needed, City, Metro Plafl and state land use and transportation policies and objectives, ' Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) f?EJ Ij] Traffic Impact Study o Land Division Tentative Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) 1 Location of existing and proposed street lightil)g, including type, height, and area of illumination Location of existing and proposed transit facilities Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and bike trails Location, widths; conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division, Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and relationship to any projected streets ~ ~ [g] ~." ~;-;. ~""* [gJ ~ [gJ ~ ~ ~ Revised 10{25{07 ,;) ( , as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map Location of existing and required traffic control devices ~ ~ E:J Transportation Notes: 1. The proposed lighting needs type, height, and area of illumination listed, Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . The Site Assessment sheet should show all existing conditions, This should be at the same scale as the Site Development Plan, The Site Development plan, then, . should show the proposed developments, . ~ ; Revised 10{25{07 Fees Associated'~ Ch Case #: TEST-Dh..~ City Wide CITY OF SPRINGFIELD 541~726~3753 Phone 541"726-3676 Fax 1/22/2008 10:48:04AM Description Postage Fee Type 11 ~ $155 CTY Site Plan Review + 5% Technology Fee Trans Revenue Date Calculated Original Amount Code Account Nl!mber Calculated By Amount Due 1299 '100-00000-425505 1/22/2008 .EM 155,00 155,00 1225 100-00000-425002 1/22/2008 EM 24,163,00 24,163,00 2299 1 00~00000-425605 1/22/2008 EM 1,208,15 1,208,15 Total Due: $25,526.] 5 s:\Tidemark\forms\casefees I,rpt Page 1 ofl 541-726-3753 Phone 541-726-3676 Fax Description CTY Drinking Water Protection + 5% Technology Fee s:\ Tidemarklforms\casefees I,rpt Trans Code 1217 2299 Fees'Associated Y-"b Case #: TEST-Dh._ City Wide CITY OF SPRINGFIELD Revenue Account Number 100-00000-425002 100-00000-425605 l Page I ofl " Date Calculated Calcul~ted By Original Amount 1/22/2008 1/22/2008 EM 990,00 EM 49.50 Total Due: , 1/22/2008 '10:59:47AM Amount Due 990,00 49,50. $1,039.50 ( TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Engineer: Matt Stouder Case#: PRE2008-00004 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) [g] D [g] D ~ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed, For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, . setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings' ' The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited , Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services . Department The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on, the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map' Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3,3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or great~r when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, we~lands, and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County, A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table , , ~ l2SJ o D ~ D ~ o l2SJ D [g] GJ Revised ,10/25/07 o "Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Sections 5,17-100, 4.1-100, 4,2-100, and 4,3-100 and must include the following information: Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ D ~ D [g] D ~ D Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Location and width of all existing and proposed easements Location of existing and required power poles, ' transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV, Indica~e the proposed connection points o Grading and Paving Plan Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) [g] D [] [g] Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not' limited to: . 'drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill [g] ~ [g] D D D ~ D [] ~ o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with the completed Storm water Scoping Sheet attached, The plan, calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ D Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study Revised 10/25/07 PW Notes: 1. The landscape plan does not indicate a seed mix 'or vegetation plan. 2, Please indicate the amount of proposed cut and fill for the site, 3, It is unclear how stormwater runoff is propsed to enter the swale system from Area 4 as shown in the stormwater study report, Additional comments' not related to the completeness of the application: . It appears the storm system has not been designed to accommodate future runoff. from the remaining undeveloped portion of the property to the east, A- l..:44 I.. ""'J'- Q4.J..-", ,~ C..I/..) f __ t<. our o^ r....~JS.y4 A-, e...s r f~ f,'j" - N.Q....J ~.-j "". "10 n.... 5-../.u I.. JAr ",:1/ fJ~'" 6.c. ~fo('" 10 .t r.'tc - E..,W" fo.h':- );+<.. . flu J,;...' ~t e. ,J-. I''':''' I,........ fi,.... - CJJ II . --- Dl.V P ,4 fP~ ,:. h..:. /ZAr,i~ J ,..,. e l'h'r ././0:" L4.f1'lr- Revised 10/25/07 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Deputy Fire Marshal: Gilbert Gordon Case #:PRE2007-00004 J FIRE , o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) ~ ~ On-site vehicular circulation , o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete. Incomplete See Fire Note(s) ~ Ij] Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities Fire Notes: 1. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: Fire Sprinklers are required for this proposal per 2007 Oregon Structural Specialty Code and 2007 Springfield Fire Code 903,2,3 and 903,2.3,1. "L SIJ, Ov~r rz. 000 Fi - , tJ"""J. 'S"fr,.:"lv~ IV..,,'j- / ~... ~ till"'; I-p. h.. - .( Dc. ~,.. \/......\ t- rA"~ S"b .....:r Revised 9/24/07