HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 4/19/2006
,-
;. ~
. City of Springfield'
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Land Division Application, Type II
Subdivision: Tentative: 0 Subdivision Replat Tentative: 0
Partition Tentative: ~ Partition Replat Tentative: 0
.. .
"
.
. - -'
Applicant Name:
Company:
I Dukes & Dukes Construction
Dukes & Dukes Con'struction
Phone: 541-747-3130,
Fax: 1541-747-3130
PO Box 71095
97401
Applicant's Rep.:
Company:
Address:
Larry Olson
Olson & Morris
380 Street, Suite 200
IFax:
97477
1541-302-9790 '
1541-485-3253
Property Owner: David E. & Laurie S. Dukes
Company: ' 1
Address: 2955 Yolanda Avenue
Phone: 541-747-3130
Fax:' 1541-747-3130
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-33-31 TAX LOT NO(S): 300
Property Address: 350 54th Street
Size of Property: 19,037Acres D Square Feet [8J
Proposed Name of Subdivision:NjA
~\J!~m'8W,",,~~~~~..,':i~~~_,:.-un=_M~"""'_=WW""'''0m=~~'='''~~'''~'''=<iW'''~*'=~"R0'i"~.,~'."'.,,,,,,,,,,-"'$;"='W<kI"=e''''''''"'''''''''''''''''''''P''''''''~k,"f'',.
Description of
Proposal: Partition one lot into three lots (one standard lot, two panhandle lots)
Existing Use: Residential
# of Lots/Parcels: 3 Avg. Lot/Parcel Size: sf Density: dujacre
~~~=:t:~;;~_
~
Zoning: LDR Overlay District:
Applicable Refinement Plan: Plan Designation:
Location: City Limits [8J Urban Growth Boundary D
Associated Applications: .
~tJliYJf4h;iW!~i,?K~"t":0im;09di:llm!fnrma\!f!~t0-'::i:Q!''t:MlliQWfufd.\101.lF'''~?ft%'!i2fuaw1]i\~iTSi)i!*-"i:~~k'1!2;W~"E"Ni~~~11-,*;&1jjtvM&2*d:Ui$4~D!fJlliit
Pre-Submittal Reviewed by:
Case No.: ~ -e:11>,,-,Ce:> Date: (initials)
. / j' Reviewed by: '
Case No.: ~ lh2a::fr-, - Gcx52--4 Date: ~ /q D::? (initials) ~
:~~!l~~~~~:;~"""1~~':C_~x~~~1;,,,z0ffifR*JL~~~,-!?~L!:;~"~~~~"0",,,"j
?7(j- C)0V'~ a{~') M6YY1S
."\
II\~...
,
Case Number:0u0 ~b - Date Submitted: L../ );er /'1'IG.,
Cf'-J'o if ' f
I represent this applic'ation to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the
completeness check performed on this application at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, I affirm the
information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein
or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the
City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement
serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete
application // '
Owner:', ~~J ~ Date: ~~~~
? -ignature /' ~/G-'
David E. Dukes
Print
5/6/2005 bj
\,,{
J:'
.2.
~.
....
'i>~4.
~.
>tJ\~6.
L
7.
r"
"'if
....
. .
land Division Submittal Requirements Checklist
*If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to
this form.
Application fee-refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. The application fee and current postage fee is collected at the time of
complete application submittal.
Copy'of the,deed and a preliminary title report-one copy issued within the past 30
days documenting ownership and listing all en~umbrances. If the applicant is not the
property owner, written permission from the property owner is required.
One additioilal copy of the land DivisionPlan reduced to 81f2"X 11", which will be
mailed as pan: of the required neighboring property notification packet.
Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has
frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. '
Stormwater Management System Study-four copies of the study with the completed
Stormwatel'. Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, supporting calculations and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures
Manual.
Traffic Impact Study-four copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance
with SDC Section 32.020(l)(c). Traffic Impact Studies (TIA) allow the City to analyze,and
evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation
system. In general, a TIA must explain how the traffic from a given development affects
the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and
immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIA must also address, if needed, City, metro
plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives.
Seven copies of the following plan sets for the Pre-Submittal Meeting
OR
Eighteen copies of the following plan sets for Complete Application Submittal
All of the following plans must include the scale (appropriate to the area involved and
sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" =
100'), north arrow, and date of preparation. All plan sets must be folded to 8'12" by 11" and
bound by rubber bands for submittal.
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
[8J Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer
[8J Vicinity Map
[8J The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb
cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what
is being removed '
[8J Required setbacks to the proposed new property lines for existing structures to remain
on site
[8J The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse
Map on file in the Development Services Department .
5/6/2005 bj
Ii,
-,~
,
[8J The 100-year floodpldln and floodway boundaries on the'site, as specifi'ed in the late~t
. adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment
, or Letter of Map Revision
[8J The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Article 17 of the Springfield Development
Code and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development
Services Department
[8J Physi~al features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when
measured 4 Y2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian
areas, wetlands and rock outcrop pings
[8J Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of
Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prep?red by an Engineer must be submitted
concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable
soils and/or a high water table , '
b. Tentative Land Division Plan
,
[8J Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with ORS 92
[8J Location of all existing and proposed easements
[8J Dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building
'site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale
['g] Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting
[8J Location, widths and names of all existing ,and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or
other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division '
[8J Location of existing and required traffic co'ntrol devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and' similar public facilities
[8J Location and width of all existing and proposed,sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian
access ways and bike trails
[8J Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip
[8J Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas,
telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points
, ,
Phased Development Plan required if redivision ,is proposed. The plan must include
the boundaries and sequencing of each proposed redivision. Any redivision must
progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of
,
the development and accommodating other required public improvements,
, ,
, ,
c. Grading and Paving Plan
[8J Prepared by an' Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer,
[8J Planting plan prepared by an Oregon Lice~sed Landscape Architect where plants are
,
proposed as part,of the storm water management system
[8J Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
[8J Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
'[8J The size and location of stormwatermana:gement systems components, including but
not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater
quality measures; and natural drainagew~ys to be retained
[8J Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for
land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals)
[8J Amount of proposed cut and fill I', ,
5/6/2005 bj
--,
.8. Additional materials that may be required
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANTSHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES OR
THE PRE-APPLICATION REPORT AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 31.030:
D Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement
D Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as
specified in SDC Section 16.100(3)
D Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 feet of the top of
bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top
of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
D A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present
D Where the development area is within an overlay district applicable, address the
additional standards of the overlay district ,
D If fiv,e or more trees are prop'osed to be, removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in
SDC Article 38 '
D A wetli'lnd delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property
D Any required federal or state permit mustbe submitted concurrently or evidence the
permit application has been submitted for review
D Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, 'a Land and
'Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted with the land use application
D Where a'pplicable, any Discretionary Use, Variance or Modification of Provisions as
specifiec;l in SDC Article 10 or 11
5/6/2005 bj
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
541-726-3759 Phone
Cic"'i.'''.c Springfield Official Receipt
''<*'f:
Development Services Department
Public Works Department
RECEIPT #:
3200600000000000200
Date: 04/19/2006
I: 11 :04PM
Paid By
LAURIE DUKES
Item Total:
<":heck N umber Authorization
Received By Batch Number Number How Received
tj 107 In Person
Payment Total:
Amount Due
150.00
3,195,00
$3,345.00
Job/Journal Number
SUB2006-00024
SUB2006-00024
Description
Postage Fee Type II - $150
CTY Partition Tentative Plan
Payments:
, Type of Payment
Check
Amount' Paid
$3,345,00
$3,345.00
cReceinll
Page I of I
~3/2212006 13: 23 FAX 541 736 1021
q~"~0/2006 15: 23 FAX' 541 4853
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD PlY ..
OLSON & MORRIS
IgJ002
q;guu~
PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT / Engineering Division
Fax: (541) 736-1021
STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
, ._________._______ (A,.a belowlhls 1I11e JlI~d oul by Applicant) ----:...
.' (please'r.iiurn 10 Malt SI';'a<r@ City ~fSp;-ini:fie'd Pub/lc Works Engineering; Fax # 736-/021. Phone# 736-1035),
email:m'3tou.der(iiJd8prlnKfield or. U!1
Project Name: p.w:,.J f... Lc....,.;t, ~ ~Applicant:
Assessors Parcel I') . 0:1. . ~ 1 } I TL 300 Date:
Land TJse(s): ....Ul.. Phone #:
Project Size (Acres): I 9.4(,. , i Fu #:
Approx.lmperviousArea: 8,OOO:rf:. Email:
1\lll.lJ:pj t\lo.k~1
'!-:lO~O(:,
I ~O~. 9')'0
1/8-;- 3.>.:n
~; (cO> cllra>\,u"c1Je!...OIII':l. co_
Project Dellcription (Include a copy of Assessor's map):
r""\:\,.'o,\ d~ I Lo-\o i"'\~ ~' \ot-~ wj~1.t e>*:d:"1l1'ec-iJelllc.t -tv
.
r~\Mo<l..""
Drainage P('opo$lll (publio connection(s), discharge locatioo(s), eto. Attaoh additional sheet(s) ifnecess<p:
, e~st:.., .,.e.~:d Q..c:.e ~ f"'~te l.3 r..J:,1 d.~: n tc:. el".\b'","1 V'O~I:h:Jf
a:o\:c.~ "li'"'''' l4J/ ~ /.,..,.,.<<d d "':II.elNtLo;I
fDtrce.(1 ",,:n W\~eJ d..-ywf,(1 ,fC>l' ~rJG+ .,t~I~r.
ProDosed ~tormwater Best Manaf!ement Practices:
ve't.~f:O... bl4.~C~ <i-..;" at" 1""..",11 b.'o -f"",,.le
" :: ,rAt,-'" bliloW Ifll.<.iitl$./llled out bvlhe 9iiv~d ~urlled /0 the Ani/lIl:lUftJ '
(AI a mini-in, 'all bootes checked by /he City on the front imd back bfthis she., shall be ;rublnttted
for an aDDlicatlonto be coinDIelefor submitlal. aIthough' olher requiremenl' may be necessary.!
Drainal!e Stndv Tvoe ffinSPM Section 4.03.2), (Note. u:H may be sub:ttituted for Rational Method\
SI Small Site Study - (use Rational Method Ibr calculations)
D Mid-Level Deyeldpmertt Study - (UB. U!lit Hydrograph Method for oalculations)
o Full Drainage Development Study'- (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculationB)
Environmental Considerations:,
~ Wellhead Zone:
-mJ Wetland/Ripafian:
1D Soil Type:
~o~,
tV/A.
3t--~
. ,
c.t(~~
~
tit Hillside Development:
'&l FloodwaylFloodplain:
IJ Other Jurisdictions
,fA
Nf'A
-
Dawnstream Analvsis:
~
o
o
N/A
Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation:
Manhole/Junction to take analysis to:
Return to Matt Stouder@ City of Springfield, emall, mstauderrfj)c/.sorlnafield-ar.us, FAX: (541) 736-1021
03: ,/2006 13: 23 FAX 541 736 1021
0,:;..'>,0/2006 15: 23 FAX 541 485 ,3
CITY OF'SPRINGFIELD PW,
OLSON & MORRIs
~003
~uuz
.'
CONWLETESTUDYlTEMS
I For Offil:liol US$ Only; ~
.. Based !,pon rhe information provided on thefroflt of this sheet, Ihefallowlng representS a minimum of what Is neededfor an
application la be complerefor submit/al wilh respecl 10 drainage; hawever. this list sha~ld not be ""ed In lieu oflhe Springfield
Development Code (SDC) or the City ',' Engineering Design Man~al. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site
approval; Addlt/ona./ site $pecific tnformation may be requIred Note: Upon Reaping sheet submftral, enBure completedfarm h03 heen
signed in the spau provided below:
Interim Design StandardsIWater QuaUty (EDSPM Chapter 3)
, Req'd N/A
D !!II All non. building rooltop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-tre.ted (e,g. multi-chambered catchbasin wfo;1 filtTotiop
media) for stormwmcr quality, Additionally, a minimum or50% oflhe NBR impOlVious surface shall h. treated by
vegetated methods, '
o ~ Where required, vegetntive stormwater design shalJ b. cousistent with interim daslgn standards (EDSPM S""tion 3,02), sot
fortb by tbe Bureau ofEnviron",.ntal Services (BES) or Clean Water Service, (CWS).
D ',~For new'NBR unpervious area I... than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach maY be followed ",specified by
tbe BES. for vegetative treallnent. '
o ~ If a stormwatcr treatmcntswele is proposed, submit calculations/speCification:. for sizing, velocity, floW, side slopes. bottom
slope, and seed mix consistent with either BES or CWS requirements;
o IIJ Watct QuoIity calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the BDSI'M
o ,iii All building rOoftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building. shall
be provided with secondary oontainment or weather resistant enelosun::.
G.D.ral Study R.qui....m.nts (EDsl'M Section 4.03)
It 0 Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Bngineer licensed in the state of Oregon. '
--rfjl A complete drainage stUdy, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map.
o Calculations showing system c8pllGity for a 2.y.... .torm ""ent and overflow effects ofa :ZS-year storm ovent.
~ The timo of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using aID tnlnute start time fur d""eloped baslns.
eview of Downstream System (EDSPM SectioD 4.03.4.C) , '
o iii A downstr~am drainage aoaly.is as described in EDSPM Section 4,03.4.C On"site drmnago shen be governed by the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). '
o .Elevations oflhe HGL and flow lines for both oily and private systems where appllcabl..
Design of Storm System. (EDSPM Section 4.04) ,
~ 0 Flow linea. slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set.
D .Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inohes fur reinforced pip. and 36 Inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or
proper enginecting calculations shall be provided when Ie... The cover ,ban be softiclent to sapport an 80,000 Ib load
, witbout failure ofthe pipa structure. '
0, III Manning's "n" value, for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4'1 of the EDSP. All ,torm pipes shall be desigJIed to
achieve a mlnimum velocity of three (3) lioef per second at 0.5 pipe fuIl based on Table 4-1 as well.
OtbrlMis.
iii 0 Existing. and proposed contours, loc~ed at one foot Jutetval, Include 'pot elevations and site grades showing how site
drains
!Ii 0 Private stormwator easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stonn_tor flows from one property to
another .
o . Drywells shall not receive ruuollftom any sorface w/o beiIig Inl,ted by one or more BMPs, with th. exception of residential
building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by th. DEQ. Refer to the website;
www_deo_state_of_us/wCl/2rmmdwaJlJichome.hCln for more infonnatiof1.. .
o -fIIDelentio~ ponds ,holl be designed 10 limit runotfto pre-develoPlDent rat., for the 2 through 2S-yaar stonn evenlll
*This form s.haU be i!tcluded t1.I an att4cbnu:nlJ Inside the front cover, ofthl! stoTl11H'ater study
'IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW AND SIGNf J'
.As the engineer ofreeort\'I horoby certify the above required items are
completo and included with the submitted stormwstcr study and plan s~
SigDature
4/~~
Date
7'- 5" -~,
.
Form Version 2: March 2004
"
,',
GILSON &
MloRRllS
A division of
L.B. Olson & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
, Land Surveyors
Urban Planners
380 Q Street
Suite 200
Springfield, Oregon 97477
(541) 302-9790
Fax: (541) 485-3253
olsonandmorris, com
Preliminary Drywell Feasibility
350 54th Street
Springfield, Lane County Oregon
The purpose of this study is to identifY the feasibility of the use of drywells to
drain the private roof drains for the future structure to be located o'n Parcell of
the proposed partition,
The drywell within this study will be used for roof drainage only.
The drywell, calculations attached, has been sized to handle storm water runoff
that will be generated by the roof areas based on 90% impervious surfaces. The
runoff was calculated based on a 5 year storm event.
The soil permeability rate used for these calculations are based on permeability
rates from the SCS Soil Survey for Lane County, A permeability test shall be
completed at time of construction to verifY, these rates.
DrvwelI Calculation SummarY:
.
Soil Type
= Coburg-Urban Land
Complex
= 4.0 in/hr
= 0,90
= 2.7 in/hr
.
Soil Permeability
Runoff Coefficient (90% impervious)
Rainfall Intensity
.
.
Studv Conclusion:
The above calculation summary and attached calculation sheets provide
information 'that shows that the use of a drywell for this site is feasible, therefore
we proposing the use of a drywell for the roof drains for future structures within
Parcel I.
The above proposed drywells are designed to have a 20 year life expectancy,
provide proper maintenance and use ofthe system, and shall be located on the
parcel to adhere to state and local building code setback requirements.
En' G 030-0')
"
Dukes & Dukes
350 54th Street
0,900
0.039 acres,
2.700 in/hr
0.095 d's
Assumed impervious roof area of 2640 sf
5 Year storm event
9,000 ft
9,000 ft
6,000 ft
4,0000 in/hr
0,00009 ft/sec
0.008 cfs
Soil Type: SCS #32 - Coburg Urban La
1Sm:@:m@E!l'\\~~~nil@JlI~]:.:iY"'WiE'~:\!'.'
TRENCH,
T~'.
.
PIPE
24,000
486.000 cf
471.780 cf
179.276 cf
v=
14.220 cf
193.496 cf
,
.'
5 0,041 2,70 0,101 28,581 0,00750 2,25
10 0,041 1.85 om[ 39,161 0,00750 4,50
15 0,04 1.50 0,05 47,631 0,00750 6,75
20 0,04 1.25 0,041 52,921 0,00750 9,00
251 0,04 1.10 0,041 58.21f 0.00750 11.25
30 0,041 0,95 0,03 60,331 0,00750 13,50
40~ O,~ 0,79 0,03 66,891 0,00750 18,00
50 0,04 0,691 0,02 73,031 0,00750 22,50
601 ----0.041 ' 0,611 0,02 77.471 0,00750 21.00
901 O~ 0,521 0,02 r-- 99,07 r 0,00750 40,50
1201 0.461 116,851 0,00750 54,00
0.Q4 0,02 ,
1501 0,041 0.411 om I 130,181 0,00750 67,50
1801 0,041 0.391 0,011 148,601 0,00750 81.00
2640.000 sf 2 year 5 year 10 year Time
4,0000 in/hr 2,10 2,70 3,70 51
2.000 1.45 1.85 2,80 101
19r4~~ cf 1.30 1.50 2.25 Isl
0,98 1.25 1.87 201
0,75 1.10 1.62 251
0,68 0,95 1.45 301
0.63 0,79 1.20 401
0,55 0,69 1.02 501
0,50 0,61 0,90 601
0.421 0.52 0,66 901
Client: Dukes & Dukes 0.361 0.46 0,54 120
Project: 350 54th Street 0.331 0.41 0.44 1501
0.311 0,39 0.38 1801
DRYWELL CONFIGURATION
INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE
PORT 12" NATIVE SOIL
~TTT"'III~lrlll III' I~'IU~TTT~
~Ci) "y.,1 - 4"ROOF DRAIN
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC /" '" '" OO~
~~~~GT5WEgFA~~IN ROCK '\ ~,~" c
EXISTING NATIVE~
SOIL
~'
~ 1 1/2" DIA. DRAIN ROCK
24" HDPE
PERFORATED CHAMBER
NATIVE BASE
/
1 1/2" DIA.
DRAIN ROCK. ~
CLEAN '"
(38% VOIDS)
, 24"
24"HDPE .
~PERFORATED CHAMBER
~~/ ' ' '.
1/ ,\
y)
4"ROOF DRAIN
'-- GEOTEXTlLE FILTER FABRIC
-
- 2.0' min
.~
'. ~.
"
1 '
ver reen
Land Title Company
PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT
/'
'\
TO:
OLSON & MORRIS
EMAIL: aaron@olsonandmorris.com
ATTN: AARON
HE: DUKES
~ /
Order reports and listing kits online at (www.evergreen]andtitle.com)
ap'lil 18, 2006
ELT-48744
Main Office:
]651 CentennialB]vd.
Springfield, OR 97477
Phone # (54]) 74]-]981 Fax # (541) 7+1-0619
Branch Office:
875 Country Club Road
Eugene, OR 97401
Phone # (541) 687-9794 Fax # (541) 687-0924
1'651 Centennial Blvd. . Sp;ingfield, OR 97477
P.O. Box 931 . Springfield, OR 97477
Phone: 541.741.1981
Fax: 541.741.0619 '
!\
~X~!gI~~~
TiTlE INSURANCE SERVICES . ESCROW CLOSINGS
875 Country Club Rd. . Eugene, OR 97401
P.O, Box 10211 . Eugene, OR 97440
Phone: 541.687.9794
fax: 541,687,0924
'.
2nd SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT
April 18, 2006
ELT-48744
Ols'on & Morris
380 "Q" Street Ste 200
Springfield, Oregon 97477
Attn: Aaron '
Dear Aaron:
\ ,
We are prepared to write Title Insurance covering the following described premises to-wit: '
SEE AITACHED
Showing fee'simple title as of April 12, 2006, at 8:00 a.m., vested in:
DAVID E. DUKES AND LAURIE S. DUKES
Subject to the usual printed exceptions, and
I. Rights of the public in any portion of said premises lying within the limits of streets, roads
and highways.
2. Easement, granted to Wallace G. Linn and Nora R. Linn, including the terms and provisions
thereof, by instrument Recorded March 8, 1946, Volume 313, Page 166, Lane County Oregon
Records. '
3. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions, but omitting restrictions, if any, based on race,
color, religion or national origin, imposed.by instrument, including the terms and provisions
thereof, Recorded March 8, 1946, Volume 313, Page 166, Lane County Oregon Records.
CONTINUED
--------.., "IN OUR BUSINESS, YOU MATTER MOST"
W\\I\tV.evergreen landtitle.com
, "
ELT - 48744
Page 2
4, Deed of Trust, including the terms and provisions thereof, executed by David E,Dukes and
Laurie S Dukes, as Grantor(s),)to Evergreen Land Title, as Trustee, for the benefit of Pacific
Continental Mortgage, as Beneficiary, Dated August 19,2005, Recorded August 26,2006,
Reception No. 2005-067301, Official Records of Lane County, Oregon, given to secure
payment ofaNote for $120,000.00. '
, ,The beneficial interest in said Deed of Trust was assigned to Mortgage Electronic
Registration Systems, Inc., by assignment, Recorded September 8, 2005, Reception No. 2005-
070540, Lane County Oregon Records. '
5. Deed of Trust, induding the terms and provisions thereof, executed by David E. Dukes &
Laurie S. Dukes, as 'Grantor(s), to Evergreen Land Title Company, as Trustee, for the benefit of
Corleen Leitzel, as Beneficiary, Dated August 19,2005, Recorded August 29,2005, Reception
No. 2005-067820, Official Records of Lane County, Oregon, given to secure payment ofa
Note for $30,000.00.
6. Judgemeht against David E. Dukes, in favor of Karen D. Dukes, entered October 18, 1996,
Lane County Circuit Court Case No. 15-96-02731, in the amount of$900.00 per month for
Child Support, plus interest, beginning July I, 1996, and modified to $833.00 per month,
beginning May 15,2001. '
NOTE: Taxes, Map No. 17-02-33-31-00300, Code \9-00, Account No. 0134443, 2005-2006;
$1,183.20, paid in full. '
NOTE: The address of the property to be insured herein is: 350 54TH STREET,
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97478.
NOTE: A JUDGEMENT/LIEN SEARCH was done for the name(s) LAURIE S. DUKES, and
as of April 12, 2006, none were found.
NOTE: As of April 12, 2006, there are no liens for the City of Springfield,
NOTE: SUPPLEMENTED TO UPDATE REPORT.
Very truly yours,
EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY
HOME OFFICE '
By: ///},
{~LYP uyo~
' Josep( M. Sile~ce
Title Officer
~----
NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREUNDER UNTIL POLICY IS ISSUED AND
PREMIUM PAID. IF FOR ANY-REASON THE REPORT IS CANCELLED, A MINIMUM
CANCELLATION FEE OF $230.00 WILL BE CHARGED. ' '
; .,' ,'i"
ELT - 48144
Page 1 of 1
Legal Description
Beginning at a point 420 feet North 00 10' West of the Southwest comer of the Jesse Mann
Donation Land Claim No. 74, in Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the WilIamette
Meridian; running thence North 0010' West 100 feet; thence East 511 feet; thence South 00 10'
East 100 feet; thence West 5 I I feeJ to the Place of Beginning, in Lane County, Oregon.
EXCEPT: Beginning at a point 420 feet North of the Southwest comer of the Jesse Mann
Donation Limd Claim No. 74, in Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the WilIamette
Meridian, said point also being the Northwest comer of Lot 6, Block I, LIBBY PARK
'TRACT, as platted and recorded in Book 63, Page 1, Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence
North 00 IO"Westalong said West line of said Jesse,Mann Donation Land Claim No. 74, 100
feet to the North line of the Deed to Clarence W: Leitzel, et al, Recorded June 22,1971,
Reception No. 51853, Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence East along said North line 83
feet; thence South 00 10' East 100 feet to the Northeast comer of said Lot 6, Block I, LIBBY
SUBDIVISION; then~e West along the North boundary line of said LIBBY SUBDIVISION,
S3 feet to the Point of Beginning, in Lane County, Oregon.
ALSO EXCEPT: Beginning at a point 420 feet North and 83 feet East ofthe Southwest comer
of the Jesse Mann Donation Land Claim No. 74, in Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the
WilIamette Meridian, said point also being the Northwest comer of Lot 5, Block 1, LIBBY
PARK TRACT, Book 63, Page 1, Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence North 0010' West
parallel with. said West line of said D~nation Land Claim 100 feet to the North line of the Deed
to Clarence W. Leitzel, et al, Recorded June 22, 1971, Reception No. 51853, Lane County
Oregon Records; thence East along said North line 83 feet; thence South 0010' East 100 feet to
the Northeast comer of aforesaid Lot 5, Block I, LIBBY PARK SUBDIVISION; thence West
, ,
along the North boundary line of said LIBBY PARK SUBDIVISION, 83 feet to the Point of
Beginning, in Lane County, 'Oregon.'
ALSO EXCEPT: Beginning at a point 420 feet North 0010' West of the Southwest comer of
the Jesse Mann Donation Land Claim No. 74, in Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the '
WilIametteMeridian; thence East 166 feet to the True Point of Beginnjng; thence North 00 io'
West 100 feet; thence East 154.0 feet; thence South 10002' 35" West 101.56 feet to a point that
is 136.0 feet East of the True Point of Beginning; thence West 136.0 feet to the True Point of
Beginning, in Lane County, Oregon.' ,
ALSO EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Springfield by Deeds Recorded August
10,'1977, Reception No. 77-50143, and Recorded February 22,1978, Reception No. 78-12100,
Lane County Oregon Official Records.
'.----- _.._-
...~.-~. ~ '~" ~, ~
. ~..~._,
Orckt- No.
-'<>
ROJI{ ;:Hi5 l'I\iiElOO
Warranty Deed
THIS INDENTURE WITNESSETH: That OOBS, H. 'COLAllJ.l/ ~d OORlS
hUB band and W~rB
COL 'J!,llr ,~'
;'t.q
..
the Grant.o~ . for and.ic. coMldera.tion of the aumo( TXl:l (.10.00) --.....-..........ooI..LA&s
to t!;,e~ paid, do hereby, bargain, &ell and convey unto Wallace G. Linn and
Nora R. Linn, hu8band and v~r. ,
the r(Jllo'\\'i,ng'de~'ribed pre~isea,to1wjt:
the a-ranUe. .
,
BEG lJinNG .AT ,.A' PO INT 420 YEE'1 liORTH GO lG 1 WEST OJ T1!Jl
SOU'l'llWEST COR1<1m OJ!' THE Jl!'.8SB II. IUJ/ll OOllATIOll L.AND CL.ADl
#74 IlFO\1l1SHIP 17 SOUTH RAllGB ,2 'tEST OJ THE WlLL.AllETTE
lIERIDI AN , RUmaNa' THENCE llORrn 00 1R1l li'llET. TlllDiCE lUST
. . . I"
511 FEET. THENCE SOU,T.!; 00 10' lUJlT 100 li'EET. THENCE WEsr
511 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNIIIG 1Ji L.Ali3 COUIl1'Y, OREGON.
SUBJECT TO LATERAL WATER DITCH ror .AI\JOlJ/lli(l PRPOERTIEB
.ACROSS EJ.Sr END OJ!' AllOYll DES~RIP1'l0J1. PROVIDlliG pm IS upn
roR SAID PURPOSE.
FJlSTRlCTIOJre; ,1/0 R.ESIDllliCE SII.ALL BE CONSTRUCTED .AT .A COST
OJ!' LE88 THAN $3000.00
~:r:'~:<:.;' ~,-~"~}; ~~~;r
::-:,:ii( ,>" "J'~ - .. '
_""iI'... 1;.., ~. " _:'.l
. -, ~ \- ,'. f '. ~ t1i
,(:!rt~~~~:~}r:~~/~. ~i
";~"'~!~::'.~"~~' ,;~",!,:
. 1:.'-'" .... , [fJ,
'<,:;{;J~~~:
.. ,', "4"
:ro, HA VE AND TO HOLD the Mid premlseJ. with lItelr appurtenan"",. unto the laid GranteO:.
tho1r heirs'and aSllins forever.
And the g,qid Grantorfl. do hereby covenant to a.nd with, the wd Grantee 8
,,.
(i.'
..,
heirs and R8SI.iTls that the Y ':. are
that they s.re free from"aU tnc:umbrarice."l
the owner"
In fee !Imple ot aaid premieel; Md-
j ~:
".\ ...
"'-':--'"
.....-.........
. '
/
.--;; I
a!ld'UHI). 't~~ will ~artant and defend the ilme from all
IN WrrN~~S;irnEREO~8Y ha To hereunto,_,
. . r ". I .. I., -~ .
",,', Hj)"/, ..' day ot' , .' " llAROIl"" '. ':,,-,;:1:"
'. :~'j.~ ;:....:~.;,~.~../.... ... ,. ';l-:'-:"
"'"rni1e~"'qf, ',""";':' "
"1..;~,,!,f./~'; '?: : :I_::.~~'"
." " .' ..,
,!,' i;{.'i'iin""'" '~!)",
, Af' l'il{'
. ;A~': .. 'J~.';,~rr;:'
:' . ,,,' I'?'~~:~ " ,~:."::.:. .'
l.::';~:' : :',~:\~':,f~~"~~;l .:. ;:'.! '., l';.~:..;~:>
r ."r ~ (, :,.' t,,_. \ I h?-LiQ}:..
1~~ ,:i!,;~;~,:~:,:,;:;~f","
r'~':" "". ~.~.I_~~.r.':.:.:~\f, :~'~"--:/"~l~ ;/;;~~ ."
"j';r.::
,-
v
"
,1_
r
'I
--'r'-
.
-i;lC5~""!~,a'1'" ....."."""N "'~ ~tll'~~' ,.'~~ " .'"' ~. ---
.~. 'Y^'&~~- 1J r
~..
';,!~':
.80)( ;)1~.~~1fj'7.
'):..:i
}- ~,
'STATE OF OREGON,
COUNTY OF LAli~
Be it ~membered that on thill 4th" day 'or llARCH
penonaUy came before me, a Notary Public In and (or said county,thewlt.hln named
.,.,{{.
.,;'
'. ,"
described In And who uecated the vrlth.tn !..",
<<ecute<! the llAIlle freely and voluntarlly!W:~,
ROSS H. COLAliAlI AliD OORlS iCOLAllAH
.i.; 40>
.~ . I
".1 .1
.
, -j
, "J
"';'11'
'4}, ~
known to be the idenj:tCAl penon e
acknowledged to me that they
. . therein named.
;.. ,d and Beal thIB day and yea, IBB! BbdJove writun, " '
~,. .
~:Ex~\,,, i ' _,.,,: __.
for till $tal' 0' 0,....... Notary Public (or Or~n.
n.e.II,lm.
I~......~~"'~:.~' .
...tUIU"'" .
"
C'.l 'I
I,
~ .'
ff3 >-
....
l: "'0 :a
m (l), 0 1':
L. (l) g;
L. Q
ro
~
I ~. ~/
. .-.--.......-.-- -. . ----.-
\
~;t~:\
:: .: ~ 't.
..,
,-
-
..
I
~.c.
;.;;:.....
Ii
'PJ
III
ao
.,.,
;
~J!~
z s .
~ .
R,~~.
" ~o 'Y
~ :tQ.
JIli~
1 -~
a j ii
.::\
. '.
s, " l'
'ry~; *'-,'
,~,:t '
"'j( ':.~...'
i~. ..:~:~~~. :~:,
:' ':.:t ~,i'... ':
,..-'" ~ '.
.~ "I:';~;"',
11
OE8.16.2005 1:46PM
'--,
NO, 4827
"" .0'_ i.~
CORLEEN LEITZEL
,
Plvlo'on or Chl.r P;,PU~Y 'Clork 2MC.nc1'M
LAn. County D..d~ and Raca~ds UVV UU ~VY
~lml~mWmllIJ~llIJ~Jl~J~!I!i~~~I/t 02: 48 ~:~ .:
RPR-DEED Cnl.! Stn=S CRSHIER 04
$10.00 S11.00 $10;00
Grllllt(jrr~ NIIJnIl l\iJd AddrU3
lJA "10 E. DUKES
2955 YOLANDA
SPRl'NGFIELD, OR 97477
G.l1lll.t"I!'sNaml!lIl'ldAdIINH
Mer rMorllillj tl!lurntD:
EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY
1509 WlLLAMn1-rE
f-UGENE, OR 97401 _
DatU n .:n!lJlC~ 1J )"I!qlustt:d. ~ f.u naU.lS1eltlJ; Ilhall be
N./It 10 the f\l~~~ "ddr.ta.
SAM!< AS GRANTEE
nTLUNO. m::r.....of1l74....
EsCROW NO. EUC5-12121
TAX ACCT. 1'0. O~H43
MA!'NO. 1101.3'3100300
WAImANTY DEED . STATUTORY FORM
\,!,un wuAL OR CORPORATION)
~ KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. Tlw CORLREN LEITZEL
E llel'eilu1jter caUtd grantOf, for IIIe conriilsratiar, henfm,,/ttr X1ated~ to grtJtlJot paid by
"",,_, DAVID E. nUKES and LAURIE S, DUKES ,
~ ltQrelllaftercaIled grantee; dOi!3 h.e.reb} gront, bar(;4bJ,. seft and tcnl'i1} untotltesalil gmntee IJnd gTalllttt'.r IUlir11
5 b
-.. $Ul1ceuors and as:ngn~J t/lat ecnatn fEw property, with the lerlemems, 1J.~ntlitanJi!l!tl41ul applJrI~nanl1BS th~reU'llo glonl1l1lg
[g Or apPertaillil~g. stl'Ul1lttl in the Cou'lty oj LANE arid Statt of Oregfm1 dcscn1Jtd as fallolf'SJ fo..wtr:
f:5
,.
~~
"'
)
(
seE I>ADIDH <\ WBIeR IS MAllE <\ PART HEREOF llY THIS REFERENCE
e To J/avB 4rld t() Hold the .JanIe unto the satJ ffTItUee QlId grrmJfl"S hBirlJ SUCt~SlOrs and tl.Jlig1ls/ol'cver.
..... And ~aid zraTttor hereby 'ovenarIts to and wiJT1. Jaid glrlllt,,, (Jha gront.ee's Irfrlrs, nJ.CCI!JS()~ Qnd arriOla. lIlat granlc}' is
B lawftllly seized in fee simple 01 th, above "'(Quod prim1se~J {1'te 170m o1lsflcumb7l1Tlces 'X"PI
oJ 2005.2006 REAL PROPERTY TAXES A LJBN, NOT YET DUE OR PAYABLE
SUlUt.CI to fIll] ellld all eaS~1nlInlS, r~strictions alW C~l'8nants ofreiOrd
alIa that cronlor will warra1lt and fo~er dc.fend tlie lam pTtllliJe1 and every pan and pflh:r![ thereof against till lallJful
cfaimJ and demands 0/ all perSiJn1 whomsoeJItr, t~c6pttlrwe claiming !Jnde7 r/re abollt described eJfcumbro.nces.
Tile t7u6 fl!Id actual consideradOn PQrd/ortlliJ'lransjer, Jtaredfn terltlf 01 rlrlllarJJ is $ 150,000.00.
*HOWeVl!7, th, adlJlJl c,onsfderolion lonJ41$ 0/ or tlldUde:l other prope'rl1 or value given or promi;fi!d wMch is (lh~
l~holelpan oldIe) cOTUMBiation (illtlicau wllit:h)." (flu tentellee between ths symbols *7 iflJOI ttpplicabll1 r/ruuld h,
a,lor,d. S.. ORS PM30,)
bJ construing Ihis deed Dnd lJ1mn: the COIUext so t-equUeJ. the slngullJY include; the plUNl and all granrlnaticnl clulnges
shall be imptitd to IIIJJkl1 tIle p"oPisionlhereof apply equally to cClf1lorations tllJIl ~divtduab. . AI ~ <:'
Tn Witllcss Wlltrtof, the grantor lIas eLI1Cllted this fnstrctlllenr this -&r!J.- day 01 ~ <:;uz, "\11' . ,
20_a')" : Va corpf/(('J.ts grancor. it !IOJ UlUSfd its naill' to be signed and still affixed O} its o/flurs, dlJ.!Y~l/.tllori:;cd thererD
by order af itS ooard oj director". ' ,
rIDS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF nm FROPBRTY l)ESCRIBED INTmS INSTRUMENT IN'VIOl.A.TION OF APPLICADlB
f..AND USE LA\V'S AND RRGlIIATION's. DEFORE SIGND"iG OR ACCl?Pl'lNG TmS INSTRUME.l\"r, TIm PERSON ACQUl':RlNG FEE T.lTI.E
TO THB~ROPERTY SHOULD ~REcK WIJ;H THE APPROJi'RIA~&CITY on COUNTY PLANJ\'lNG DEPA'RTMENT TO Vl!:RliY /LmOVlID
USES ANDrO Dln'ERMINioANY LlM1T&QN LAWSOlTS AGAlNST FARMlNG ORJ:ORE9I'l'RACl'ICIlS.ASDEFINED INORS 'Q_~10,
~Ip~ o/~,/').~ /!
CORUItNLElTzE/;""/t.-. 'f--~~/J"""
5rATEOFOROOON.COUNTYOF tJ.Jv.p ,
lu.
TIllS mR:"':"" w/os A"!"'OWLllDGiD ''''ORRM' ON 8' bR 0 ,>oQL, BY CORLEIlNLIDTZllL
'~\h 0_ M,"m""''''''u_, ~'iftJ~
Nlltllry~r.rOttGlln .
OFf:IOIA.l~ .
SHelLy COAL I
NoT4RVPU~O.QAEGoN, .
',I'r(': 'cm.lMtSSIONNO.3G92Gi
.~"'E'lPlJu;8FEBAVAA"'t,~~
p, 2
-/ ,.'Dt,;, 16,2005- 1 :47PM
NO, 4827
p, 3-
... "".~. .., ,
EL T - 48744
Page 1 ofJ
, I.egal Dclscriplion
Exhibit A
,
Bclgil1nillg al a point 420 liNt Nonh 00 10' West of the Sowhwest comer of the lesse Marin
Donatiun Lanu Claim No, 74, ill ,Township 17 South, Rung.: 2 West oflbe Willamette
Meridian; running thence North 00 10' West 100 feet; thence EastSl1 feet; thence South 0" 10'
East 100 leet;' thence West 511 I<:etto Ihe Place uf Beginning, in Lane County, Oregon.
EXCEPT: Ikginning at a pnint 420 I<:el Norlh of Iho: Southwest corner of the Jesse Mann
DonUlioll Land Claim No. 74, in Township 17 South, Range 2 Wo:st of the WiIlamette
Merilliun, said point also being the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Block I, UBBY PARK
TRACT, as pJulled ami n:cordetl in Book 63, Puge I, Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence
North 00 10' W.:stlll,'.ng said West line of said Jesse Mann Donation l.and Claim No. 74, 100
t<:.:t,lo th.: Nonh lin~ of Ihe Dc"d 10 Cla..ence W. Leil~el, et ai, Recorded June 22, 1971,
Re~epljlln No, 51853, Lane County Oregon Plat Records; Ihence East along 'said North line 83
ket; lhencll Suuth 00 10' Easl 100 fedt /u the Northeast comer of said Lot 6, Block], LIBBY
SUBDIVISION; thence West along lhe Norlh boundary Jine of suid LIBBY SUBDIVISION,
83 fcellO thll Point of beginning, in Lane County, Oregon.
ALSO EXCEPT: 13egilining al a poinl420 teet North and 83 feet East of the Southwest comer
uflhe Jesse Mann Ponution Land Claim No, 74, in Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the
Williullelle Meridiun, said point also being the N()rthwest corner of Lot 5, Block I, LIBBY
PARK TRACT, !look 63, Page I, Lane CounlY Oregon Plat Records; thence North 0010' West
parallel with said WeslIiilC of said D'lllalioll Land Claim 100 feel to the Norlh line of the Deed
,10 Clareuct; W. LeilztJI, "I ai, Recorded Julie 22, 1971, Reception No. 51853, Lane County
Oregon Rccurd,; thence Easl along said North line 83 feet; lhence SOlllh 00 10' East 100 feet to
the NUl'llleast cumer llfalili'<:said Lo! 5, Block I, LIBBY PARK SUBDIVISION; thence West
along the North boundary line of said LIBBY PARK SUBDIVISION, 83 feet to the Point of
Beginning, 'in Lanll County, Oregon.
A'I.SO EXCEPT: BeginningulU poinl420 teet Norlh 00 10' West orthe Southwest comer of
Iht: Jesse MUlln Donullull l.and Claim No. 74, in Township 17 South, Range 2 West ofthe
Willamelle [Vlll!'idiall;lhcnce Easl 166 feel 10 the True Poinl of Bl:ginning; thellce North 0010'
W""l 100 l<:elj Ih"lle" cu"t.lS4.0 feel; lhence Soulh lOo 02' 35" West 101.56 feet to lIpolnt that
is 136,0 l<:el Eust of lht: True Puint of Ueginning; thence West 136.0 feet 10 the True Point of
Heginning, in L.un~ COIilny,Oregon. ._
ALSO EXCEPT (hat ppl"tion conveyed to the City of Springtield by Deeds Recorded August
10, 1977, Reception No. 77-50143, and Recorded February 22,1978, Reception No. 18-12100,
Lalle Connty Ol'cgon Otlicial Records." "
, ,
,I
lAND USE FIANNING AND lONSUlTING SERVICES
380 Q STREET
SUITE 220
SPRINGFIELO, OREGON 97477
TENTATIVE PARTITION APPLICATION FOR
DAVID E. & LAURIE S. DUKES
Property Owner/
Applicant:
David E. & Laurie S. Dukes
2955 Y olanda Avenue
Springfield, OR 97477
Tel (541) 747-3130
Applicant's Representative:
Olson & Morris
c/o Larry Olson, PLS
380 Q Street, Suite 200
Springfield, OR 97477
Tel (541) 302"9790
Planning/
Project Coordinator:
Metro Planning, rnc,
clo Robert Stevens, MCRP
380 Q Street, Suite 220
Springfield, OR 97477
Tel (541) 302-9830
Fax (541) 485-3253
Assessor's Map:
17-02-33-31
Tax Lot:
300
Area of Request:
] 9,037 Square Feet
Existing Zoning:
LDR (Low-Density Residential)
Plan Designation:
Low-Density Residential
Number of Parcels Proposed:
3
Area of Parcell:
5,068 Square Feet
Area of Parcel 2:
6,356 Square Feet (4,650 square feet
excluding panhandle driveway)
Area of Parcel 3:
7,613 Square Feet (5,037 square feet
excluding panhandle driveway)
David E. & Laurie S, Dukes
April 19, 2006
Page 1
Back!!round
,
This application is for a tentative partition at 350 54th Street within the Springfield city limits,
The proposed.partition will create three parcels out of one existing lot. Two of the proposed
parcels are being designed as panhandle lots with frontage and access both coming from 54th
Street. There ~re three existing structures located on-site, The existing house will remain on
Parcel 2, but the shed and carport will be removed,
There is one existing blanket easement for a water ditch that applies to the property that the City
would desire to see vacated, The easement was included as part of a warranty deed to be used for
water service. The easement was recorded on March 8, 1946 in Lane County Deed Records
(volume 313, page 166)., A couple (husband and wife) are listed as the grantors who created the
easement. However, it is very possible that both people may be deceased given that 60 years has
elapsed since the easement was created. Given this fact, the easement probably cannot be
vacatedlreleased during the final plat process.
The applicably requirements for a tentative partition per the 'land division checklist' are
addressed below. In addition; the criteria of approval per Springfield Development Code (SDC)
34,050 are included below,
City of SDrin!!fieId Land Division Checklist
Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
(1) Vicinity map
A vicinity map of the general area. around the proposed partition is shown on the Site Assessment
(sheet I). The vicinity map is also on the tentative partition drawing.
(2) The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb
cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what
is being removed.
There are three existing buildings on the property (a house,shed, and carport), The house will
remain, but the shed and carport will be removed, All dimensions of the buildings are shown on
the site assessment and tentative partition drawings, The existing driveway has two ingress-
egress points (curb cilts)onto 54th Street and the length of the access point is identified on the
drawings, There.are four trees on the subject property; all the trees are proposed to be removed
because of the location of the shared panhandle driveway and future dwelling on Parcel 3.
(3) Required setbacks to the proposed new property lines for existing structures to remain
on site.
The house on, Parcel 2 is the only structure that will remain on-site. The orientation of the house
, David E, & Laurie S. Dukes
April 19, 2006
Page 2
"
faces 54'h Street. The front yard setback to the proposed east property line of Parcel 2 will be 10
feet. The interior yard setbacks will be 7 feet, 15,7 feet, and the setback to the panhandle
driveway wilJ"be 22.4 feet. All setbacks to proposed property lines are shoWn.
(4) The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bankof all watercourses
and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited
Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department.
No'watercourses or riparian areas as shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on
file in the Development Services Department are located on this property,
(5) The IOO-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood I'!surance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map
Amendment or Letter of Map Revision.
The subject property is locate.d.on FIRM Map No. 41039CI166F in Zone X, Zone Xis an area
determined to be outside of the 500-year floodplain, Given this fact, this,requirement is not
applicable to the drawings.
(6) The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Article 17 ofthis Code and delineated on the
Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department
The subject property is located outside of the -I, 2, 5, 10, and 20 Time of Travel Zones as
delineated on.the Wellhead Protection Area Map. The site falls within the 99 year Time of
Travel Zone (the zone of concentration), However, none ofthe boundaries'ofthe zone of
concentration are near the subj ect property; thus no boundaries can be delineated on the drawing.
(7) Physical features including, but not.limited to trees 5"in diameter or greater when
measured 4 Yz feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian
areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings.
There are four trees (18" Apple, 14" Apple, 12" Pine, and 18" Pine) on the development site.
The two apple trees are located within the proposed panhandle driveway and will have to be
removed, One pine tree is located within the proposed 7 foot PUE along the 54th Street frontage.
The second pine tree is located in the center of Parcel 3 where the future dwelling will probably
be constructed: For these reasons, all trees will be removed. There are no additional physi,cal
features on the property; including riparian areas, wetlarids, and rock outcroppings,
(8) Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of
Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted
concurrently if the soils survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable
soils and/or,a high water table
According to the Soil Survey of Lane County, one hundred percent (100%) of the site is Coburg-
Urban Land Complex (No. 32). These soils are stable; thus a geotechnical report is not required.
David E. & Laurie S, Dukes
April 19, 2006
Page 3
Tentative Land Division Plan
(1) Loc;ltion of all existing and proposed easements
There are no existing easements on the subject property. Two easements are proposed, A 26 foot
private joint-use access and utility easement is proposed over the shared panhandle driveway, A
draft copy of the document that will create the easement, including maintenance agreement, is'
attached, Further, a 7 foot PUE is proposed along the 54th Street frontage.
(2) Dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building
site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale
Proposed Parcell will be 5,068 square feet. The proposed Parcel 2 (panhandle lot) will be 6,356
square feet. The buildable area of.Parcel 2 outside the panhandle driveway will be 4,650 square
feet. Parcel 3 (panhandle lot) will be 7,613 square feet with a buildable area of5,037 square feet
outside of the panhandle driveway. All dimensions of these parcels is shown on the tentative
partition drawing.
(3) Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting
There are no existing or proposed street lights along 54th Street adjacent to the proposed
partition; thus, this requirement is not applicable,
(4) The location, widths and names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications or other rights-
of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land partition
,-
The subject property isiocatedadjacent to 54th'Street. 54th Street has a 60 foot right-of-way
width adjacent to the site, The right-of-way width south of the site is 55 feet. There are no
proposed streets, alleys, or dedications adjacent to the site,
(5) Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities
There are no existing or proposed traffic .control devices, power poles, or transformers adjacent
to the property. The nearest fire hydrant is 74 feet south of the property. There is a mailbox unit
located across 54th Street from the subject property and is shown on the site assessment and
tentative partition drawings,
David E. & Laurie S, Dukes '
April 19, 2006
Page 4
(6) Location and width of all existing and proposed Sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian
access ways and bike trails
There are no existing sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, or bike trails adjacent
to the subject property, No sidewalks are proposed as part of this partition,
(7) Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip.
There are no proposed streets with this partition application. Two street trees will be planted on
54th Street per city design standards.
(8) Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacentto the site including
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas,
telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points
All existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site and the connection points are
shown on the tentative partition plan, Sheet 2. Utilities will be located underground in
appropriate easements,
Grading and Paving Plan
(1) Planting plan, prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect where plants are
proposed as part ofthe stormwater management system
No plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system,
(2) Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
The roof drainage patterns and discharge locations are shown on the Stormwater Management
Plan (see Sheet 3),
(3) Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
All pervious and impervious area drainage patterns are delineated on the attached Stormwater
Management Plan.
(4) The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but
not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater
quality measures; and natural drainage ways to be retained
The location and size of stormwater management system, components are shown on Sheet 3,
David E. & Laurie S. Dukes
April 19, 2006
Page 5
(5) Existing and proposed spot elevations and contour lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for
land with a slope ove'r 10'percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals)
Existing and proposed spot elevations and contour lines are drawn at 1 foot intervals. Elevations
and contour lines are shown on all sheets,
(6) Amount of proposed cut and fill
No cut and fill is proposed as part of this land division application,
Additional materials tlrat may be required
(1) Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement
No deed restrictions or Homeowner's Association are proposed.
(2) Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as
specified in SDC Section 16.100 (3)
This application is for a tentative partition; thus this is not applicable.
(3) Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 feet of the top of
'bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of thc
top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQL W
The subject property is not located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any riparian areas.
,(4) A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present
The soils on the site are stable; thus a geotechnical report is not required,
(5) Where the development area is within an overlay district applicable, address the
additional standards of the overlay district
The subject property is not located within an overlay zoning district; thus this is not applicable,
(6) I(five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in
SDC Article 38
Four trees are proposed for removal; thus this requirement is not applicable,
David E. & Laurie S. Dukes
April 19, 2006
Page 6
(7) A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property
There are no wetlands on the subj ect property; thus this is not applicable.
(8) Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence, the
permit application has been submitted for review
There are no federal or state permits required with this proposed partition,
(9) Where any grading, fi,lIing or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and
Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted with the land use application
A Land and Drainage Alteration permit will be applied for during the building permit process
when site development will occur.
(10) Where 'applicable, any Discretionary Use, Variance or Modification of Provisions as
specified in SDC Article 10 or 11
No Discretionary Use, Variance, orModification of Provisions application is required,
,
SDC 34.050 - Tentative Plan Criteria for Aonroval
(1) The request conforms to the requirements of this Code pertaining to parcel size and
dimensions.
Parcel Area and Street Frontage
SDC 16.030(2) requires that lots or parcels on north-south streets have a minimum of 5,000
square feet in area and 60 feet of frontage, Parcel 3 will be a standard lot located on a north-
south street that will have 74 feet of frontage. Further, Parcel 3 will be 5,068 square feet. Parcel
3 will be in compliance with SDC pertaining to parcel size and frontage.
In terms of panhandle lots in LDR, SDC 16,030(6)(a) requires a minimum area of 4,500 square
feet in the pan portion and double panhandle lots must have 26 feetof combined frontage, Parcel
2 will be 4,650 square feet in the pan portion. Parcell will be 5,037 square feet in the pan
portion. In addition, Parcels I and 2 will each have 13 feet of frontage for a combined 26 feet.
The two proposed panhandle lots (Parcell and 2) will each comply with the SDC in terms of
parcel size and frontage,
Setbacks
SDC 16,050(1) requires a 10 foot setback for front and rear yards. Required interior yard
setbacks are 5 feet per SDC 16,050(2). For panhandle lots, the setbacks are based on the
, orientation of the dwelling occupying the lot per SDC 16.050(4)(a), The existing house that will
David E, & Laurie S. Dukes
April 19, 2006
Page 7
"
remain on the property will be located on Parcel 2, a panhandle lot. The house is oriented
towards 54th Street. This house will have a 10 foot front yard setback and 15,7 foot rear yard
setback; which meets the standards ofSDC 16.050(1). The smallest interior yard setback for the
same house will be 7.3 feet. All setback standards, are met for the existing house that will
"remain.
(2) 'The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement
Plan diagram, Plan District map, and ,Conceptual Development Plan.
The plan designation in the East Main Refinement Plan and Metro Plan is low-density
residential. The subject property is zoned LDR (low-density residential), This zoning is
consistent with the Metro Plan and applicable refinement plap diagrams,
(3) Capacity requirements of public improvements, including but not limited to, water and
electricit):j sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and
traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be
available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by
this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility
provider shall determine capacitY issues.
All existing public improvements necessary to,serve the proposed development are located
within the 54th Street right-of-way, There is an 8" wastewater line in the right-of-way with a 4"
lateral that serves the existing house. The 4" lateral will be cut back and used to serve Parcel 3.
This 8" wastewater line is very adequate to accommodate the two additional proposed dwellings
in the future, In addition, there is an 8" water main and gas line along the eastern boundary of
the subject property, There is an existing roadside ditch with a culvert under the existing
driveway thatcan handle roof drainage, This development proposes a vegetated buffer along the
southern boundary of the site to accommodate new drainage and direct the runoff to the roadside
ditch. Further, the existing right-of-way, 54th Street, can easily accommodate the minimal
increase in traffic from the two new dwellings that will be created, The capacity requirements of
these public improvements will not be exceeded with the proposed development and these
improvements will be available at the time of development.
(4) The proposed development shall comply with aliapplicable public and private design
and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations to
ensure the connection to public utilities and the installation of streets.
The applicant's project engineer has ensured that all public and private design and construction
standards will be met in regards to the proposed utilities and stormwater management system
components, '
(5) Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular
traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within
the d~velopment area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood
activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize curb cuts on
David E. & Laurie S, Dukes
April 19, 2006
Page 8
arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations
and comply with the ODOT access management standards for state highways.
The existing llOuse and both proposed dwellings will have ample area adjacent to the dwellings
to accommodate parking as required. In addition, there are already two ingress-egress points to
the property that will be utilized for the proposed development. No new curb cuts will need to be
created, The northern ingress-egress point can serve Parcel 3, The southern ingress-egress point
will be available to be widened and used for the panhandle driveways that will access Parcel I
and 2. These ingress-egress points will allow easy and convenient access to the existing right-of-
way, 54th Street for pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicular traffic. With two ingress-egress points
the chance, of congestion will be minimal. From 54th Street, residents will be able to connect to
'B' and 'E' Street which will provide easy connections to surrounding residential areas. The
existing' 54th Street will also provide an easy connection to Main Street and nearby commercial
facilities, transitstops, and neighborhood amenities. This proposed partition will provide good
street connections for pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicular traffic,
(6) Physical features, including but not limited to, significant clusters of trees and shrubs,
watercourses shown on the, Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map'and their
associated riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings and historic features have been
evaluated and pr!ltected as specified in this Codc or other applicable regulations.
There are no physical features located on the subject property; including significant clusters of
trees or shrubs, watercourses, wetlands, rock outcroppings, or historic features, This criterion is
not applicable to the subject propertY.
(7) Development of any remaiIid~r of the property under the same ownership can be
accomplished in accordance with the provisions ofthis Code.
David and Laurie Dukes do not own any adjacent land, Further, the entire area of this proposed
partition will be developed; thus there will be no remainder that could be further divided, Given
this fact, this criterion is not applicable,
(8) Adj!lccnt land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its development in
accordance with the provisions of this Code.
Most of the surrounding area around the proposed partition has already been fully developed,
According to 2004 LCOG aerial photography, Tax Lot 200 to tlie north of the proposed partition
is the only sun-ounding property that is large enough to be further divided, There will be no off-
site impact from this proposed partition. All development activities will occur on the subject
property, Given this fact,that there is no off-site impact, adjacent land to the north can be further
developed in accordance with SDC requirements.
(9) When no concurrent annexation application is submitted with a Partition.Tentative
Plan on property that is outside of the city limits but within thc City's urbanizable area,
the standards specified below shall also apply.
David E, & Laurie S, Dukes
April 19, 2006
Page 9
(a) The minimum area for the partitioning of land in the UF-I0 Overlay District shall
be 10 acres.
(b) EXCEPTIONS:
1. Any proposed new parcel between 5 and 10 acres shall require a Future
Development Plan as specified in Section 29.070(1)(c) for ultimate development
with urban densities as required in this Code.
2. In addition to the standards of Subsection (9)(b)l, any proposed new parcel
that is less than 5 acres shall meet one of the following standards:
a. The property to be partitioned shall be owned or operated by a
governmental agency or public utility; or
b. A majority of parcels located within 100 feet of the property to be
partitioned shall be smaller than five acres.
3. No more than three parcels shall be created while the property remains within
the UF-I0 Overlay District, unless permitted by Section 34.040(2).
The subject property was annexed into the City of Springfield in 1960. Given this fact, this
criterion is not applicable to the subject application,
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at Metro Planning by email '
(robertial.metronlanning,com) or by phone at 302-9830.
Thank you,
Robert Stevens, MCRP
Associate Planner
David E. & Laurie S, Dukes
April 19, 2006
Page 10
'1
/~S'
103
'" ;~-
" .r ,:~.
,it"
E MAP 17 02 .3.3 1.3
'~ W t
u
..<{
~ ...J t
Q..e
~ ><S\~ ,~,
,,~<< 1%'" 6
~\~\\) "E r' __/~r,
......\).---~ r'-:~r~'
~ I"() I~.J:""'~'~ 1 05
U) ~'o
......,.
~f'
.302
APPROX.
:JR. SEC.
N ~
, ~.~ ,-.
tl. ~ '::l... "C.."="' "::.
~ ~~ 107 ~~.';.. 8
~, ...;.~--
\:
~4'
/A/r
./3I~
102
L
I-
w
lLJ
0:::
I-
en
"
"
's
/J.r"
104
'...1
.50'
S
6
2
'15'
106
300
CANCELLED
5300
7304
H'
~H
:\":\ .
~..\ S
. .
, 9
"
SITE
~
9
....... IYf/r-/4d '"_ ,s."
~=>.O"'- .._.1'" g;o..O'.....~ .-... 6'3'__0'-"
1 '
"', ,,,,..,0, ',tILl.-..1J/l' e.3'o' q,U' un, ""lb."'.' f'l'
')j' .,~
~ 12.~ ~
rs." .. f7 1'S:4' ...~
," a\, 1l""\ : .
506 ~ 505 ~:p $.n'''''''':' IAn' ;~:
~ ~ . ~ 504 ~ /AU ~.
.;:/ ~ ~~, ~ i 503~ 502 If:I:
, ~d 7 <:Xi'" 8 ~ ' ~,' J .
''\:,:.."", r~:"''' '\ 9 .~~~ J l' ~~ I-
= cr._,...~"'f . 11. 'i _
...-,... ~.;~--~'Y ...'tI . , ~
. t... ~.1'? .1'.... ~, "'<#.II1:rfL.!.
511 "~ 512 <, 600 /07./0' ~~.t /;< It)
~ ~ ~ " · 601 Z
't ~ ~ ..LIt" S7'f, k ' .
2: i ~ " , '~Ik
w.,d "";rd' t'Ii:.,,~. .~... 86_"h \.i' /07:/5 '" 7"'7..I's- SD'
~t'tS.7
,
.
405
5
$,0
~~B
a~.a
408
(!I!~_ ea..Q',~
5
"'...'
507
6
510, . !Ii
,"
3 a ~
A - -----,--1 -
:1,
tQq:.oeo'
~.O""""
.... '~I
,!O
, 0
~ ;;-
>I' 0
,.. 0
~
u_. .10.'-fr
i>
e
404 '
4CD~
~:s..o
"lo.'i'J'
<<A~
@ ~\0'
~o-
~
b
(1
'"
'403
"
"
~
401
402
o
o(i
..
3
&3.0'
2
ea..o'
STREET
o
.
C\l
-.t
t<)
t<)
C\l
o
,....
~.IO
~.O.
~"'I.
i>
,;
"
409
40~
~x:J ~#H ;u"
.$DO.71 .
-
411
410
q
~
,..
412
~
'f
"
2
3
",.~
a..
<(
::E
w
w
Ul
33;7--STREET~
~ ' ,
~ ~
W~fr _____-!"~/T __ __ 11\
- ~-jIt -
N.E. cow." "N.W. .~~.
...rF7D.LC. 46, .,.p.L.C
r
VIClNIf'Y flAP
lEGAL DllSCR/PIION m
_A1"PQIIIIIHU'IS1Ht~rCl/RllDl"
LOt I. IIIQIG MIA; AS IlWRD IItIJ RmIllIlED . III 1.1
51<< II. !AW Cf/UIII'f CII'liUI' IUI Rf'QlllIDS. . 1M auar.
"lIlIRQI:5WIP0111IPC___Pr/iIIFMlDWIIQ'
W or ~ noa SWIH ",no- fItSIltIl.1J nn
.IICt IDl IIfl.D nrr: FIotlIltXllH ..... US1 I&XlQ)
tm; JJOa lJISI IllUI IR1 ., H JILf' PfJIII Of
~.tu:"'.~lMtIDIIr.(lIIIRiOI
fID71IS . /w.Ju"""~f~NS
I. Ulllll:SAII(Pl5JW:AIlO~.J' ~'I.. .,,,JUtUn'
/DR) /UI.
1. 10 SI1ItDl.QnS AUOSnl
J.ftIflHrt/IMIIS~~rH'$IXIDI(JFIfDJD/I'f_
c. , ""0',.., UItIIltSSJ..-IIIIRWIIIIl8ISID1/PDII
-- MID AS-aa.l-.s M1fJIIItItIlItOlI/ltJlIl1D
IPQIl "DD ., QAIIIrJR' INS IMP 9CW.CI. H
t--- UJVJIS
... DClIr<< f DIED' IIIJII a.f'JD5 QDIDI' ".. 5~ I.
~_lI1ltMltIlDllLQ.S.
I. IWlIfI(JIiflIWlSlfIOUJI(U1IIm5lJrI/!l5llJtlalJ./IUIII
___ to. Df)ISlrf IDIPDI.
1. HIItNiCSIUPlft<<:lUDl~J'.,rllSJ'Q1H
_"_,,,,1'-" Ot".msrmr___
4 lHtlJlS151Dl(J11HtAliQUn'ens""rHSI1ItD-cH1S
QASSf8 4 A ""* S1IItn rdGP ClIiIIl QJT1l1t (JI 5iWbU
.. AlrA.Df/JltflallBllIS ".". ""r/Wlg;_OIuss,
IQ. 1IDIt1/llf1G....".... ..(J/IlJIII/J.wmQISa:MlCUIlISJO
IMS......",C1Il:tPt/lS~
". DlSlIC CGrml.aS JIlt AI,' MZIIlU IP1CAI our. srsm (JJt
DIr (I ~ ........, /IX>>. arJAIIlW .
'501..
11. _ftfI'lSlR~f.IlII!*lJIII/JCUMD_IlQl.ua
IS U-l.J: AS.....uMtlJSFGIID.. SlIIlS.sufI(r/T
1MctDRr. _
HFIIDPDl1I'lStQ:llll:PMlO/E It/llFaMPSfHJJI/tll.r
,MllJIS......JI1lJMGJDMOIIJSIlr 1M' jDQ-1fAI
n_ '
,e. .unr MI1r IPJUID' ME sr 1lI'<<WIP,.0 SIDP.
IS. t.IlSDIC:90JII/)t:IIIPOIfI'lD.mamAU: ()IIO
......... 10..-
'AlII:5IIC~&WISIUlC_IlUII1tItIl_
oj, ,'",," ..IUItAllll:DS '.1.
11.II1JAaC'SJDlIlr...rPI5JSt1l1tlIIIMW_t.aSDlC
QlSlIr MOt M:\UlS 1. J IlII. IIDIt trXI' ... UlU
~ID!IJO(MIIU'llllll'IIIlHal'AlIlZJMI)lla
5tRP MID ,.." ... Sl'Smf" MICD: , .... II1tItIl A
AIltUlDlh'l:lU fOR"~"r.
II. .5lIm' DiID IIfIl AS SPCa.
Itl DClf'ISIII)Q::IIrllQQSUllDMH,SWOlllPSNP.
>>. UlWIMtItlRSFll/RlflrI1llH SI>>1HMtlJlIIIIiH1SfIIa
AIlIrIISlflfJlttllYt/IIHtASl.
11.OI1Ii!t/lllfJll(R1rt<<AJI'D"'HlD/IlDft:rllDDlUlll'
(ll-rr-.... (JI raoa):
n. fUIOI1rlSSU!Lrt1'IOA~liI5D07, "...tAIPIlI
.unr /JJ'IOI ACmSS 1Ht lAS1 PI) IT H AIlRI'Pr. PDI
1JOQJIIlIII~lIIIQa'M M):.....JI.lIWif'A &otJC'"
ct1III1rtliniQfcram. .
lJ.lJISlJIlI: ..slRlUDr". ", IJt an IfICIt _ USCD RJII mncr
""-..
~~'=:E~-:..-:~~::::--
~
1
~'" ~=~ ~=\ ~
~~ -..,\
I 'C,:,:'9,__"'- IIJ/J'IV I, I
"'-~' GJJlT::"II IQ.JI' c.-""C7~,~":~,,.-,
:"u,uu"'""",u1 ~ '__,',~'., _...' ,', ,.""ii,.:i'i:"',i >: " " ' ,//:
D'~ I ~ fit = ~ ~~,~.,,:i.\~.!.:,:,'::::.;.',.,'!.i.:..,~.'i~~~:_C: ' .~/.~.,~. ~ I
rJMWWo : JO Bf' JlPPID j;" ;">"":";\"'~", ,,~;::,~J;:-~',<~'-,::.::y:. "~"'i 'T
t::J, ~ .u'?>i-..,u,..""1i".....:...,...,0.'> iI,'::,::',::'!,!i:7 PARCEL 3' ] "" 1 ~ I
",'" !l ' i; ..:::... l:!, i "~.::ih0::r ....~r...;, :;-,1:: !l; ~
~ ;~~. "'"" ~; 1;/._""','..,.'".,,, ,,.... V.. : ,I l!ii I ~'"
~" jI-I1T-'u,i-" 10_ ~',:):"~' .p Y-ll I
~ -.....;LR ~C~;~;/::u~~'~ ~\:~.:,;:,:.,.',i"..'..~,.".,..~-,. '1>" -' J ~ JalIWClI, I
~:J __161 ~ {=~ ~ ',,::;, ~I 1'~il1"'l-! . '
~ b~'''''':'' · -.'" -. L -,~.." -..... r \ I, ,:~C~:,):f,1 f ;I"!..... i 'I <
~ ... fIDI1CJOIIIlJ ~ __-.---0;:. - .~~111!!.....~~ ~ - -,J,,-':'~. _..- S _!...- I '
;:: :",uuu=',;;r uuu: .....~ .. ~~-t":;;" ~-.,;,:".,. '~.'" ~:;.,; ~ Of'"~
I ~"!!: ..-... ol --<-;. ,;;- -. - 1" - ..~ , .' _.""1 ,.'
*;:'7-: , 7t~~~*~~~;:t~";":~'lf1~:!1 .._
V.....--::""-."
1t_{llJ-4Ifl.1'l
It _ (W)-41.Jt1
LEGEND ~UI
TENTATIVE PARTITION
FOR
DA VID E & LA URIE S DUKES
S" 1/4. SEC.33, 1.178., R.2"" ".AI.
SPRINGFIELD, LANE COUNTY. OREGON
SURVEYED: AUGUST 9. 2005
II>
~
~
..."
~ .
(, S
" If
'" '
~
:~-=)
~
....1
US>
.
.
::!"'~';;.;.;:,:;=-'":2','Z
~~
~
/'-'-""-,
I '
\........,.-)
.----
-+-
-....
"MJJ/lttlllIiII_
........-
.M....
atS1ItC."Q'lrJQ.-CW
.----
taSIK r IQlD 1Dtt:E
:::::.,- >
.--.......
DISlJC 1lIL1IflI<<". ~".
DISlJC ....... Wl8I. LK . __
DISlJC .uDl J!tlEIP.. r,.
DISlJC tutII!C' C1P''' ~
1I<<llI<....
_som_
(.I:l5JJCAaIl f:IIiIOD'lD.1I'IIlII'D
DISlJC tJWlIl ...., ID.....
~__'1JiIIfDl:r
_IG1JDSOU
t.-:.,p ItGlr DFI'C2lW. CUIOf'
--
~ .ua 1!tO.....
IIIllRDI 4- fIfJ(Jt AIIII. SRRmUDr UlI''' CIIIPI'
AU'GSEP .~ ~ SlIIIa ,. ., (,.IJZIIIlS
PlSIIC ~- tIIU rr COIIIItD
.-- ... lOt
"".M
1lliHI..o1-W
N!U: ......_
.---- -
?:/VZZ II z:
!- -... I
------fv----
-E-~----(
.....--- .,----
---""'-----'
-1-1-1(-
. 1
it]
CI
.
~
IV
+
o
,TlIfl JDBtIOlOlllJ
--(......
:~I>-
~8.1tW-1!i
___s" w-
o{r-,-
L
N
t
,"",>>>,
JO' . 10'
orNER
,.. I. lAM S/UttS
--
~ ouar INl1
()fll N1-J1JD
SfrK ADDRl!SS
_JfINSI
SAWiFIlA ClIIRDr IN"
!!l!81JIPIIR/ClJENL
DIAlU . /UttS t>>IlSlaC1D
POlDitlllJlj
at.P[. CIUPf I1ttJl-D1R
(5f') Nl-.JIXJ
SIIRrEYOR
.......-
Ji>>OSDll7,UC1DlJ
SFW:IlInlACJIR:OI' ,Nn
(5fl)JDl-I1ffJ
~l
......, SUIM'IOR
OREGON j
_..0.....
-........
...
__DUt:12-31-2ODl5
,
",'
~
n
n
I
(\j
o
OJ
;::;
7
!S
t-
t-
7
t-
(l)
ex:
o
ci
..J
W
U.
()
z
ex:
0.,
IJJ
~
!/)
SHEIfT t OF 3 0-
vLSON & MORRIS 380