The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPacket, DIM PLANNER 10/13/2008 - ' CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING I ". DISTRIBUTlON DATE: October 13, 2008 TO: . ' Current Plannin Staff: G. Karp,~ Donovan~L Pauly, T Jones, (8rea Ma-tt l L Davis, M Metzger L Miller, A UmDlra, U Keesor, S Hopkins, !VI Mammal! Jeff Paschall, Supervising Civil Engineer, Public Works Department -./ Ken Vogeney, City Engineer, Public Works Department v' Matt Stouder, AlC Engineering Supervising Civil Engineer, Public Works Richard Perry, Public Works, Engineering Kristi Krueger, Civil Engineer, Public Works Department ---I Brian Barnett, Traffic Engineer ...:L Jon Driscoll, Transportation Planning Engineer, Public Works Gilbert Gordon, Deputy Rre Marshall, Rre & Ufe Safety Department Melissa Fechtel, Rre & Ufe Safety Department --/ Greg Ferschweiler, Maintenance, Public Works Department X Pat Fre, nch, Planner, Willamalane Park and Recreation District C E IVE D Thomas Jeffreys, Emerald Peoples Utility District (EPUD) :':)E Tamara Johnson, Springfield Utility Board (Electric) ;, Bart McKee, Springfield Utility Board (Water) Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board Lynn Detering (Stuckrath), OOOT Dave Puent, Building Official Will Mueller, L TO --/ Norm Palmer, Quest Communications v' Tom Boyatt, Public Works Dennis Ernst, City Surveyor Celia Barry,(Shashi Bajracharya) Lane County Transportation Jim Henry, Central Lane Communications 911 Dave Shore, Northwest Natural Gas Tom Henerty, Comcast Cable Jerry Smith, Police Chief Chuck Gottfried, Water Resource Coordinator, ESD Susie Smith, Public Works Director Len Goodwin, Public Works John Saraceno, Springfield School District 19 -+ Joe Leahy, City Attorney ..JL George Walker, Stormwater Facilities Planner, ESD, John Tamulonis, Economic Development Mgr. Courtney Griesel, Planner 1 (EDM) Bill Grile OCT 132008 By: DIM .p~ A Development Issues Meeting will take place on Friday, November 7, 2008 @ 2:00 - 3:00 p.m. in the DSD Conference Room 616 @ Springfield City. Hall. Please review the enclosed information, and come prepared to discuss this application with the Planner and applicant. Should you have any questions, please contact Mark Metzger @ (541) 726-3775. --~~- Revised: 7.21-08 DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD CITY HALL 225 FIFTH STREET DSD Conference Room 616 Meeting Date: November 7, 2008 @ 2:00 - 3:00 p.m.. 1. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING #ZON2008-00037 ODOT Assessor's Map: 17-03-33-14 TL 600 Assessor's Map: 17-03-33-41 TL 101 Assessor's Map: 17-03-33-44 TL 100, 200, 300, 2600 Address: 3001 Franklin -Interstate Highway, 1ransportation Corridor Existing Use: Interstate Highway, Transportation Corridor Applicant submitted plans to discuss removal of the original and temporary bridges and build permanent replacement bridges over the Willamette River and Franklin Blvd, as well as associated roadway and stormwater work, which will necessitate the demolition and replacement of the Canoe Canal Bridge over the Patterson Slough, directly north of the Willamette River Bridge. Planner: Mark Metzger SPRII..-:liFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, 0'3. 97477 (541! 726-3753 FAX (541) 726,3689 www.ci.springfield.or.us October 13,2008 Geoff Crook Oregon D.;.p""::....ent of Transportation 680 Cottage St, NE Salem, OR 97301-2412 RE: ZON2008-00037 (17-03-33-14 TL 600,17-03-33-41 TL 101,17-03-33-44 TL 100,200,300,2600) Development Issues Meeting - Applicant submitted plans to discuss the removal of the original and temporary bridges and building permanent replacement bridges over the Willamette River and Franklin Blvd., as well as replacement of the Canoe Canal Bridge over the Patterson Slough, directly north of the Willamette River Bridge. Dear Mr. Crook: Thank you for your Development Issues Meeting submittal. The following meeting has been scheduled: TYPE: DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING PLACE: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT CONFERENCE ROOM 616 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 DATEffIME: Fri., November 7, 2008 at 2:00 - 3:00 pm CONTACT PERSON: Mark Metzger If you have any questions, please call me at 541-726-3775 . Sincerely, Mark Metzger Urban Planning CC: Corrinne Humphrey Oregon Bridge Delivery Partners 1001 SW 5th Avenue, Ste 1800 Portland, OR 97204 Nancy Nething Oregon Bridge Delivery Partners 1165 Union Street NE, Ste 200 Salem, OR 97301 \l.' N Go<" ,,<1'\\II///~(" 125~'~ \ - II I o ~.~ ~E;GO PROUD HISTORY BRIGHT FUTI)Il,l;: Date Rec~lved; City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 OCT - 9 2008 Original Submittal Development Issues Meeting (DIM) Required Project Information . . (Applicant: complete this section) Prospective Applicant Name: Geoff Crook Phone: 503.986.3425 Icompanv: Oregon Department of Transoortation (ODOT) Fax: 503.986.4469 IAddress: 680 Cottaqe Street NE, Salem, Oreqon 97301-2412 I I Prospective Applicant's Rep.: Corrinne Humphrev Phone: 503.423.3785 Icompanv: Oreqon Bridge Deliverv Partners .Fax: 503.423.3737 IAddress: 1001 SW 5th Avenue. Suite 1800, Portland, Oreqon 97204 I .. ., 1 Propertv Owner: Geoff Crook I Phone: 503.986.3425 Company: Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) IFax: 503.986.4469 Address: 680 Cottage Street NE. Salem, Orellon 97301-2412 I " . '".: .,.. , ~ " .' ,:.: , I ODOT ROW, See I . ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: Attachment B TAX LOT NOeS): See Attachment B 1 Propertv Address: 1-5 and Willamette River, Lane Countv. ODOT ISize of Propertv: Proiect Study Area aporoximately 145 Acres [XJ Sauare Feet 0 I -' ,,~ .-,... :, " -, .. . ~. I Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: See Attachment A IExisting Use: Interstate Highwav, Transportation Corridor 1# of Lots/Parcels: NA [AV,q. Lot/Parcel Size: NA sf .1 Densitv: NA du/acre I~.,,~- -'.:. . .:....,...... '.0.',.,",,;,-,h:,r,~..'.~._~.,'."'~.'~"-"!l"-' .._j Prospective Applicant: ~~~ Signature Geoff Crook Print Date: /o/p~'p> ---- I Reviewed by: 1.. l/h./Jl.-, Ipostaae Fee: $0 Case No.: LOn J-J1R -rrllii- Date: In!q! f) ( IADDlication Fee: $ 5d../ ~ Technical Fee: $0 .-- - TOTAL FEES: ~ 5.1103- PROJECT NUMBER: Pf<.;S2JJOg,Otfl5& j 1't-~?:,::.i~"!.'::!f,((,';;:;X~1-.~Dlll!'~,~ ~,;r'r'~':Z~~L;;gNi'J!J.":'~~.T.1.'tj;'r:._",~~.!.j.;c',NJ":'~~~b<:.~~.;'O?"&i.'f;.....:;",,-;r-"""~~\1-_;;i';,.;,q'~,\v~~,:. ~~X\ii;~.rl":~:Y.;:i~"'~;;U\"fi'~?":"::tJ.~;f;';~^'.~,_~::::".p;_:.t.s:"'_~';.'~ii,i;i'~ .,i,~ -~';!':1i.'l;;:!'.r.(:.;.t:._~,-:.,,:;t''''..H;>,;,.7 J Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 1 of 3 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP ZON2008-00037 Interstate Highway, Transportation Corridor SITE Map 17-03-33-14 Tax Lot 600; Map 17-03-33-41 TL 101; Map 17-03-33-44 TL .100,200,300,2600 NOrh Date Received: OCT - 9 2008 Original Submittal .~ oregon bridge delivery partners" October 8, 2008 Mr. Mark Metzger, Planner III City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 Re: 1.5 Willamette River Bridge Project City of Springfield Development Issues Meeting Submittal Dear Mr. Metzger, On behalf of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bridge Delivery Partners (OBDP) is submitting a Development Issues Meeting (DIM) Application and Request for the Interstate 5 (1-5) Willamette River Bridge Project. The purpose of 1-5 Willamette River Bridge Project is to improve safety and maintain connectivity and mobility for all users of 1-5 over the Willamette River in the Springfield/Eugene Metropolitan Area. The original 1-5 Willamette River Bridge was inspected in 2002 and found to have substantial problems. The bridge was taken out of service and a temporary detour bridge was built to carry 1-5 traffic. The 1.5 Willamette River Bridge Project would remove the original and detour bridges and build permanent replacement bridges over the Willamette River and Franklin Street, as well as associated roadway and stormwater work, which will necessitate the demolition and replacement of the Canoe Canal Bridge over Patterson Slough directly north of the Willamette River Bridge. ODOT must receive the necessary approvals for the project as soon as possible (by April 1 , 2009 at the latest) in order to begin construction of this critical infrastructure project in 2009, which will necessitate working within . the Willamette River during the 2009 in-water work period. If ODOT is unable to obtain these permits, the project will be delayed for an entire year, which might put local and interstate transportation at risk. Ten sets of the submittal materials have been included with this DIM submittal. The proposed project summary is located in Attachment A - Description of Proposal. Attachment B contains aerials of the project area with tax lot information. Attachment C lists the DIM questions. Attachment 0 contains applicable graphics and plans. Please note that these plans are based on the Draft Design Acceptance Package (DAP) Report, which has been prepared for ODOT. The DAP and Design Plans are still in draft form and based on 30 percent design. More project specific and detailed information will be available during final design, which will be submitted with required permit/approval applications. In summary, this application includes the following information materials required for the DIM: . Approvals requested (to be discussed at the DIM) . DIM Application Form oregon bridge delivery partners 1165 Union Street NE Salem, Oregon 97301 Page 1 of 2 oregon bridge delivery partners" . Attachment A - Description of Proposal . Attachment B - Map and Tax Lot Information . Attachment C - DIM Questions . Attachment D - Existing and Proposed Bridge Graphics, Site Plan, and Applicable Design Plans (30 Percent Design) . Approvals Requested ODOT is seeking required approvals from the City of Springfield to construct the replacement 1-5 bridge and remove the original and detour 1,5 bridges crossing the Willamette River in the Cities of Springfield and Eugene. ODOT will need to obtain the following land use approvals as requested from the City of Springfield: . Type III Wiliamette Greenway Overlay District Discretionary Use Approval under Springfield Development Code 25.050 and 10.030(1) to address the visual impact of the replacement bridge, and associated Site Plan Review. . Planning Director Determination of Springfield Development Code 31.240(2) to address the potential impact on riparian function. . Type I Floodplain Development Application Permit to allow construction in the floodplain and/or floodway, and associated Land and Drainage Alteration Permit. ODOT would like to meet with the City of Springfield as soon as possible. I will call you in the next few days to schedule the DIM meeting. Please contact me at (503) 423-3785 or corrinne.humohrevililhdrinc.comor Donette Miranda at (503) 423,3814 or donette.mirandaililhdrinc.com if additional information is needed or if you have any questions. Sincerely, {;b t Corrinne Humphrey, AICP Oregon Bridge Delivery Partners 1001 SW 5th Avenue I Suite 1800 1 Portland, Oregon 97204 ph: 503.423.37851 fax 503.423.3737 . email: corrinne.humohrevililhdrinc.com CC: Greg Mott (City of Springfield) Heather O'Donnell (City of Eugene) Steve Turner (ODOT) Richard Upton (ODOT) Nancy Nething (OBDP) Linda Riley (OBDP) James Gregory (OBDP) oregon bridge delivery partners 1165 Union Street NE Salem, Oregon 97301 Page 2 of2 City of Springfield Development Services Departme,nt 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Iss~es Meeting (DIM) '. . a. . . _ . ,-- Prospective Applicant Name: Geoff Crook Icompanv: IAddress: I I Prospective . Applicant's Rep.: Corrinne Humphrev Phone: 503.423.3785 [companv: Oreqon Bridqe Deliverv Partners Fax: 503.423.3737 [Address: 1001 SW 5'h Avenue, Suite 1800, Portland, Oreqon 97204 I '-'. [Property Owner: Geoff Crook IcomDanv: Oreqori Department of Transportation (ODOn IAddress: 680 Cottaqe Street NE, Salem. Oreqon 97301-2412 I . I ODOT ROW, See ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: Attachment B [proDertv Address: 1-5 and WilJamette River. Lane County, ODOT [Size of Property: Proiect Studv Area approximately 145 Acres ~ Sauare Feet 0 , I Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: See Attachment A [Existinq Use: Interstate Hiqhwav. Transportation Corridor .1# of Lots/Parcels: NA lAva. Lot/Parcel Size: NA ,. Phone: 503.986.3425 Oreqon Department of Transportation (ODOn Fax: 503.986.4469 I I I I 680 Cottaqe Street NE, Salem. Oreqon 97301-2412 Phone: 503.986.3425 Fax: 503.986.4469 ITAX LOT NOeS): See Attachment B sf [Density: NA du/acre Prospective Applicant: Si~ Geoff Crook Print Date: /o/p~p.. --- . ,a_ Case No.: I Reviewed by: ITechnical Fee: $0 Ipostaqe Fee: $0 I PROJECT NUMBER: Application Fee: $ ITOTAL FEES: $ I" " , <.';T ~ ',. ", Revised 1(1(08 Molly Markarian . 1 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application, A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or . the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the .status of known development opportunities and constraints, The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application . The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. . Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday, . We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. . The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting . The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting. . The meeting is scheduled for one hour. . Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. . The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist i:8J Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. The applicable application, technolo"gy, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. Development Issues Meeting Application Form Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, -the list is limited to five questions. (Attachment C) i:8J i:8J i:8J , . Ten (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan, However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. (Attachment 0) Applicants are aiso encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5,12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5,17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. i:8J Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" i:8J Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' i:8J North arrow i:8J Date of preparation i:8J Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number i:8J Dimeosions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area i:8J Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points i:8J On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained i:8J Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed; dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions (N/A) o o Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review (N/A) o Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height o Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces o Parking and circulation plan Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 3 of 3 1.5 Willamette River Bridge Project Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Table of Contents Attachment A - Description of Proposal Attachment B - Maps and Tax Lot Information Attachment C - DIM Questions Attachment D - Existing and Proposed Bridge Graphics, Site Plan, and Design Plans (30 Percent Design) Figures Figure A-1 - Location Map Figures B-1 A and B-1 B - Tax Lot Maps Figures D-1A, D-1B, and D-1C - Existing and Proposed Bridge Graphics Figure D-2 - Site Plan . Figure D-3 - Design Plans Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Page 1 ':-. Attachment A , Description of Proposal . Description of Proposal . I. . The purpose of the Interstate 5 (1-5) Willamette River Bridge Project (Project) is to improve safety and maintain connectivity and mobility for all users of 1-5 over the Willalnette River in the Springfield/Eugene Metropolitan Area. I I. The original 1-5 bridge over the Willamette River was inspected in 2002 and found to have substantial problems. The bridge was taken out of service and a temporary de)our bridge was built to carry 1-5 traffic. The Project would remove the original and temporary bridges and puild permanent replacement bridges over the Willamette River and Franklin Boulevard (Blvd.) as well as associated roadway and Stormwater work, which will necessitate the demolition and replacement of the :Canoe Canal Bridge over the Patterson slough, directly north of the Willamette River Bridge (WRB). ' , I The Project is part of the Oregon Transportation Investment Act (OTIA) III State Bridge Delivery Program, which involves the repair and replacement of more than 300 bridges statewide over a ten year period. The Project is the largest in the $1.3 billion OTIA III program.! .' I ' The proposed project has the following main components: , . Demolition of the decommissioned WRB, Canoe Canal Bridge, and detour bridges (salvaged portions of the bridges would be recycled or reused as much as possible): . Construction of replacement. bridges; and I o Reconstruction of the roadway near the bridges including the Franklin Blvd. on- and off-ramps. I The new bridges would be constructed in almost the same location' asthe existing bridges; there would be relatively minor shifts of align.ment, as well as minor changes to th~i Franklin Blvd. ramps. , The new bridges would be designed with enough width to eventually carry up to six lanes of traffic (three in each direction) to meet the projected traffic needs for the next 20 years. The new bridges would be striped to carry two limes in each direction, which matches 1-5 in this area.: Future widening of 1-5 will require a full environmental review. I I I Site Location I The Project is located on a section of 1-5 that runs generally. in a north-south direction, with the City of Eugene on the west side and the City of Springfield on the east sidk, in Lane County, Oregon (Figure A-1). The proposed project legal description is United States Geological Survey (USGS) Eugene Quadrangle, Township 17S, Range 3W, Section 33 and Township 18S, Range 3W,:!Sections 3 and 4: 45.0454'N" 12305'W (NAD83/WGS84). ' ~ Attachment A - Description of Proposal Page A-1 "i. ~ ! I NolToScaIe ',$ . ~ -~~~~& ~r - "To,. OTfA ....'..1 loc;,ion MaD FlGUREA.1 --- ",*~IOOOTlt1Y"~ >,- Proposed Project General parameters for the roadway work on this project include the following elements: . Remove the existing decommissioned 1-5 bridge and the temporary detour bridge over the Willamette River, Franklin Blvd., and the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR). . Replace the 1,5 bridge over the Canoe Canal. . Construct new 1-5 bridges over the Willamette River. These bridges will cross the Willamette River, Franklin Blvd., and UPRR. Parallel northbound (NB) and southbound (SB) bridges will be constructed. . Reconstruct highway approaches to the 1-5 bridges. . Modify the Franklin Blvd. exit ramp. and entrance ramp. The alignment of 1-5 will generally follow the alignment of the decommissioned bridge and the detour bridge. However, each of the two new bridges will be wider than either of the existing bridges. Thus, the new bridges will be on a new alignment within the general footprint of the existing bridges. Conditions that heavily control the new alignment design consist of the following: 1. Relinquishment of the temporary easement back to Willamalane Park forces the permanent alignment away from the existing detour alignment. 2. Bridge design requirement that the proposed 1-5 mainspan across the river be contained mostly on a tangent alignment. ; 3. Aesthetic requirement and bridge design requirement that the profile of the 1-5 SB bridge and 1-5 NB bridge be identical for the mainspan over the Willamette River. 4. Vertical clearance requirements over a future widened Franklin Blvd. require a much higher vertical profile for 1-5 at the crossing of Franklin Blvd. Attachment D, Figures D-1A, D-1B, and D-1C provide a present and proposed view of the WRB. Construction Schedule The critical path for construction is controlled by the activities associated with the WRB. The most critical items for meeting the required project construction schedule (project completion by December 12, 2012) are the portions of the project that necessitate in-water work. The timing of these construction ele'ments is restricted to approved windows of time when in-water work is permissible (June 1 through October 31). All other elements of the project will need to be coordinated such that the progress of the WRB is not impeded. In order to meet this timeline, ODOT must receive the required land use approvals from the City of Springfield and the City of Eugene by April 1, 2009. The general construction sequence for the project is as follows: 1. Remove the existing decommissioned bridge over the Willamette River. 2. Construct the new SB WRB. 3. Concurrent with 2, complete all other activities required to move all traffic onto the SB WRB. 4. Remove the existing detour bridge. 5. Construct the new NB WRB. Attachment A - Description of Proposal Page A-3 6. Concurrent with 5, complete all other activities required to move NB traffic onto the NB WRB. 7. Remove any remaining temporary structures/falsework and clean up. The exact timing of individual construction activities is currently unknown. With the Project.being on the critical path for the construction, there is a need for Early Work Packages to expedite progress as much as possible. The ability to complete any in-water construction activities during the 2009 in-water work period will increase the likelihood of successfully meeting. the project schedule; Due to the tight construction schedule, the contractor must construct all the foundations within the river during a single in-water work period (2009) so that completion of the NB structure will not be as constrained by remaining in-water work periods. This will require that shafts are drilled with limited overhead clearance for those portions of the NB replacement bridge that lie beneath the detour bridge. The Architecture and Engineering (A&E) design Consultant (OBEC) and the Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) (Hamilton Construction) do not currently anticipate the limited overhead clearance will preclude this procedure. Cost Estimate The total construction cost in 2010 dollars is $142,753,000. The 2010 estimate was calculated by applying a 12 percent total inflation factor to the estimate based on 2008 costs. The year 2010 was chosen as the approximate midpoint of the construction period. It is unknown at this time if 12 percent is a reasonable assumption based on the fact that recent construction cost inflation is significantly higher than that over the past year. It is estimated that a delay in the project will result in an additional cost in excess of $17,000 per day. Right-of-Way The ODOT right-of-way (ROW) in the vicinity of the bridge varies, but it is anticipated that the majority of proposed construction will remain within it. However, there are locations where additional ROW or easements may be required as follows: . "FS1" Sta. 195+00, Rt. - City of Eugene Property (Augusta St.) "LS1" Sta. 391+00, Lt. - Lane County Property (Transfer Station) Regarding the City of Eugene Property (Augusta St.), negotiations are currently underway between the City of Eugene and ODOT regarding how to handle the ROW need. There is an existing temporary easement with Lane County for the Lane County Property (Transfer Station); a portion of the easement may need to be converted'to permanent ODOT ROW. Upon verification of the above ROW needs as design progresses and pending ODOT coordination with the local municipalities, OBEC will prepare a ROW map and description for each parcel. OBDP will be performing all ROW acquisition for ODOT. Attachment A - Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Information Page AA Roadway Design Criteria The roadway design will conform to the ODOT Highway Design Manual, 2003 (English) and AASHTO 2002 Roadside Design Guide. The construction plans and associated documents will be prepared in accordance with the ODOT Oregon Standard Specifications for Construction, 2008; Oregon Supplemental Specifications for Construction, 2006; and the BOOM. The project will be designed and constructed using English units and incorporating the 2002 Oregon Standard Drawings. Key criteria specific to this project with respect to highway alignment, as documented in the previously submitted Roadway Design Criteria, are as follows: . Design Speed -1-5: 70 mph. . Design Speed - Ramps: 50 mph. . Bridge Width: 64 feet curb-to-curb bridge width will accommodate future widening of 1-5 to three lanes in each direction. . Clearance over railroad: 23.5 feet. . Clearance over Franklin Blvd.: 18'-4" per Oregon Motor Carrier Transportation Division (MCTD) to maintain current minimum clearance. . Median Width: Median width will vary: 42-inch-tall concrete median barrier will be provided on the roadway segments. . Median width at connections to existing 1-5: match existing median width on both ends of the project. . South End of Project Limits: 16 feet with 42-inch-tall concrete median barrier. . North End of Project Limits: 8.4 feet with 42-inch-tall concrete median barrier. . . Roadway Width: Two 12-foot travel lanes will be striped across the bridges in each direction and approaches will be constructed to match current conditions. . Ramp Width: Ramps will be one lane. Portions of the ramps that will be reconstructed will match' the existing conditions including short sections that will be two lanes. Summary of Existing Roadway Conditions' Interstate 5 (1-5) is an Urban Interstate and is a controlled access freeway that has two NB travel lanes and two SB travel lanes separated by a paved median varying in width from 8.4 feet to 16 feet. The 1-5 vertical profile in both the NB and SB directions is similar due to the fact that the opposing lanes of travel are . connected by a narrow paved median. Within the project limits, 1-5 ha~ been temporarily diverted to a lengthy detour structure over the Willamette River, and this detour structure has a design life of 10 years. The roadway width for one direction of travel across this detour bridge typically consists of two 12-foot-wide travel lanes, a 3.5-footwide inside shoulder and an 8-foot-wide outside shoulder for a total one-way roadway width on the detour bridge of 35.5 feet. The construction year (2012) average daily traffic (ADT) is forecasted to be approximately 65,000 vehicles on 1-5 in the project area, and is predicted to increase to 88,000 ADT by 2032 (20-year design). The posted speed limit is currently 60 miles per hour. The existing terrain is mostly rolling and increasingly becoming more urban. ROW widths vary throughout the project. There is one interchange impacted by the project, which is the Franklin Blvd. Interchange (MP 192.25); and one interchange in close proximity to the project. which is the Glenwood Interchange (MP 191.98). Roadway Typical Section The new 1-5 bridges over the Willamette River and Canoe Canal will be designed to eventually carry up to three lanes of traffic in each direction and will accommodate the 20-year design for future traffic needs. For Attachment A - Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Information Page A,5 the future scenario, each 1-5 bridge will be capable of carrying three 12-foot travel lanes and two 14 foot shoulders for a total roadway width of 64 feet on the bridge. The bridge rails (three-tube curb-mounted rails, ODOT Standard Drawing BR208) are 1'-7" wide. The ouHo-out width of the bridge deck is approximately 67'-5.5". It is worth noting that the bridges have also been designed to allow for future widening of Franklin Blvd., possible addition of another railroad track, and to accommodate possible future improvements to the Franklin Blvd. interchange. Although the new bridges together are wider than the decommissioned bridge, additional travel ianes on 1-5 are not proposed as part of this project; and 1-5 roadway sections will not be widened beyond what is required for staging traffic. The new bridges will be striped to match the existing two travel lanes in each direction at both the north and south ends. In general, the two-lane section in each direction on the new bridges will consist of two 12 foot travel lanes, a 14-foot median shoulder, and an outside shoulder in excess of 12 feet. At the south match the two-lane section will match the existing median shoulder of 7 feet, and at the north match the two-lane section will match the existing median shoulder width of 3.2 feet. All superelevations within the limits of the 1-5 reconstruction will meet 70 mph standards per the ODOT Highway Design Manual. The reconstruction of the Franklin ram'ps will consist of a single-lane ramp section with a 16-foot travel lane, 4-foot inside shoulder, and 6-foot outside shoulder with an additional 2-foot shy distance. All superelevations within the limits of the ramp reconstruction will meet 50 mph standards per the ODOT Highway Design Manual. Horizontal Alignment and Vertical Profile "LN1" Line (1-5 NB) and "LS1" (1-5 SB) These 1-5 alignments generally run in a north-south direction, separating the City of Eugene to the west and the City of Springfield to the east. Beginning at the north end of the project under the Centennial Blvd. overcrossing, the "LN1" and "LS1" alignments run south following the existing freeway tangent and diverge from the existing 1-5 alignments by utilizing 1 O-minute or flatter reversing curves over Canoe Canal. The reversing curves end just north of the WRB structures and follow a tangent onto the structures for about 800 feet. At this point the "LN1" and "LS1" alignments then enter a SCSCS curve system consisting of a new 600-foot spiral, a new 10-15' curve, and a new 600 foot spiral segment that transitions to an existing 20 - 30' curve. All horizontal geometrics and superelevations will meet 70 mph design standards, except for those standards shown in the design exception narrative of this report. The proposed vertical profiles of the "LN1" and "LS1" line meet 70 mph standards and the maximum grade for both alignments is approximately 3.5 percent. Within the proximity of this project there are two interchanges (Franklin Blvd. and Glenwood Blvd.) that are spaced close enough to warrant auxiliary lanes between the interchange ramps. These auxiliary lanes exist today and are being perpetuated without modification with this projeCt; however, this requires a design exception since the existing weave lengths do not meet current standards. Please see the design exception narrative of this report for additional explanation and clarification on this issue. "FN1" Line (1-5 NB Exit Ramp to Franklin Blvd) This ramp is being reconstructed horizontally and vertically from the Riverview Street intersection to its departure from 1-5 (approximately 1,900 feet). The design speed for this ramp is 50 mph, and the horizontal design of the ramp meets all 50 mph standards. The "FN1" horizontal realignment diverges from the existing ramp alignment just east of the Riverview Street intersection, and this is accomplished by utilizing a 400-foot spiral from the existing tangent at Riverview followed by a 7"-15' curve transitioning into another Attachment A - Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Information . Page A-6 400-foot spiral. A short tangent is used, followed by a 200-foot spiral and 10_ 42' curve that matches into the "LN1" alignment at the standard exit ramp angle of divergence. The proposed "FN1" vertical profile meets 50 mph standards and has a maximum grade of 4 percent. The maximum superelevation is 10.5 percent, and all ramp superelevations meet 50 mph 'standards. "FS1" Line (1-5 SB Entrance Ramp from Franklin Blvd) This ramp is being reconstructed horizontally and vertically from the Riverview Street bridge to its connection with 1-5 (approximately 1,800 feet). The design speed for this ramp is 50 mph and the horizontal design of the ramp meets all 50 mph standards. The "FS1" horizontal realignment diverges from the existing ramp alignment just east of the Riverview Street bridge: this is accomplished by utilizing a 250-foot spiral segment from the existing 20_ 38' curve across the Riverview Street bridge that is then followed by a 5-degree curve transitioning into a 250- foot spiral. A short tangent is used followed by a 250-foot spiral and a 10-15' curve that matches into the "LS1" alignment at the standard entrance ramp angle of convergence. The proposed "FS1" verticai profile meets 50 mph standards and has a maximum grade of 3 percent. The maximum superelevatlon is 9.5 percent and all ramp superelevatio'ns meet 50 mph standards. Hydraulics The existing decommissioned WRB has six piers in the main channei of the river consisting of 6-foot- diameter twin-cylinder piers with connecting diaphragms. The hydraulic topics examined for this summary include pier configuration details as they relate to friction losses through the bridge opening within the 100- year floodplain, debris potentiai, and fluvial connectivity. A site visit was completed on June 6,2008, to collect the data required to perform the hydraulic analysis on the bridge. Observations of ttie conditions at the site reveal that there is vegetation in the channel both up and downstream of the structure, and woody debris can be seen hung up on the piers of the detour structure. Aerial photographs were reviewed to determine geomorphic fluvial history of the river at this location. As the historic photos show, the river became channelized after the construction of the dams on the upper reaches of the river system. 'Just upstream of the bridge a dam was built as a flow control structure to divert the flows of the Willamette into the Mili Race, which supplied power to Eugene in the early 1900s. After the Mill Race was decommissioned and the flows were again directed to the middle of the Willamette River, a localized redirection of flow occurred and induced scour on the northeast river bank just upstream of the flow control structure. A rip rap spur was added to direct the flow away from the bank; however, the site visit . revealed that the flow is still being directed at the bank. Undercutting and erosion is taking place, reducing the valuable protection that is available in the vegetation along the bank. The original HEC-2 data was obtained from Michael Baker & Associates, who house and distribute the Flood Insurance Study data from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) archives. The original river model was duplicated in HEC-RAS, and a New Base Condition was established by including additional cross sections. The existing structure was then added to the New Base Condition. The proposed WRB wouid replace the existing decommissioned bridge in its present location. Currently, the proposed concrete deck arch bridge has two piers in the main channel of the river; one located at the center of the span, and one located just inside ordinary high water on the south bank under both the NB Attachm~nt A ~ Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Information Page A-7 and SB bridges, respectively. The configuration of these piers and the arch ribs they support has been developed with consideration given to hydraulic efficiency. The hydraulic opening has been improved by reducing the pier area in the stream cross section under the 100-year water surface elevation. This reduced area will result in a reduction of friction losses through the bridge opening, thus tending to lower the water surface elevations. When considering crossings over rivers where potential for debris is known to exist, the minimization of piers should be considered along with a shape that reduces the potential for debris to accumulate at the upstream face. Typically, the shapes that reduce the potential for debris accumulation include a triangular- shaped or well rounded upstream face. During lower flows the water surface will be at a level on the shaft cap and not on the arch rib or column above. The upstream faces of the shaft caps will be shaped in their final design to minimize drift snagging. The final hydraulic analysis using HEC-RAS on the selected alternative will confirm whether the water surface elevations of the alternative are comparable to that of the existing conditions and meet the FEMA No-Rise Requirements. Additional refinement of the pier geometry for the selected alternative is likely to be required to ensure no-rise conditions and to minimize drift potential. Stormwater Stormwater management for this project will be designed to meet the OTIA III Environmental Performance Standards (EPS) in order to meet the requirements of the programmatic environmental permits that apply to the statewide bridge program. These perfonnance standards define the level of effect that a project may have upon the environment, thereby limiting or avoiding impacts to the environment through the use of proper planning, design, and construction activities. To meet,the goals of the EPS, water quality and quantity facilities will follow the guidelines established in the new ODOTStormwater Management Initiative supplemented with the guidelines from the local jurisdictions of the Cities of Springfield and Eugene, which the project will also need to satisfy. The new ODOT Stormwater Management Initiative Guidelines require all stormwater runoff to be treated for water quality and water quantity only when the increased runoff from the new impervious surface increases flow by 0.5 cubic feet per second (cfs). The ODOT Stormwater Management Initiative Guidelines provide an exception for water quantity treatment if the discharge directly outfalls into a large body of water, in this case the Willamette River, or it is sh'own by hydraulic calculations that the geomorphic channel conditions are not changed by the net effects of the increased runoff.' The City of Springfield has adopted, in the interim, the stormwater management guidelines from the City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services and Washington County Clean Water Services. The City of Springfield accepts stormwater management plans to be designed using either guidelines. The City of Springfield also uses 0.5 cfs as the threshold for water quantity flow control. . The new ODOT and DEQ requirements for contributing drainage area will be followed for the amount.of stormwater runoff to be treated. The new guidelines apply to stormwater flowing into the project from ODOT ROW that is hydraulically connected to the project. The additional contributing drainage areas that are required to meet the new directive include 1-5 from the end of the defined project up to the Glenwood Attachment A - Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Information Page A-8 . overpass, Franklin Blvd. from the crest vertical curve just west of the Franklin Blvd. overpass bridge to the end of the bridge, and the 1-5 NB off-ramp from the intersection of Riverview Drive to the Eugene city limits. The Best Management Practices (BMPs) selected for stormwater management on this project inciude bios lopes, grassy swale with amended soils, bio-infiltration swales, and di)' detention ponds. All of the BMPs selected provide a high effectiveness for the removal of sediments, nutrients, and heavy metals both dissolved and particulates; and provide moderate effectiveness for removal of hydrocarbons and polyaromatic hydrocarbons. A Conceptual Stormwater Management Plan has been prepared to illustrate the location and the type of BMP selected to meet the EPS. Stormwater designers have been in discussion with the Cities of Springfield and Eugene regarding stormwater management. As the current stormwater plan is conceptual, it has not been included with the DIM submission. The stormwater design plan will be provided with required application submittals. In the northemmost 900 feet of the project, there is no increase in impervious area; therefore, only water quality is required to meet the EPS. Bioslopes on both the NB and SB lanes were chosen for this area because of the limited ROW. The next 700 feet, up to and including the Canoe Canal Bridge, will utilize bio-infiltration swales to provide water quality and quantity. The bio- infiltration swale will have an overflow system that will discharge into Canoe Camil. Runoff from 1-5 north of Franklin Blvd., beginning at the crest vertical curve located on the WRB and ending at the Canoe Canal Bridge, will be collected in a storm sewer system that will discharge into a bio- infiltration swale. The bio-infiltration swale will be graded to drain back towards the Willamette River. All flows not infiltrated will empty into the Willamette River through an overflow system. Runoff from 1-5 south of the crest vertical curve up to the railroad will be collected through inlets in the bridge deck and conveyed below into a bio-infiltration swale before discharging into the unnamed tributai)' downstream of the railroad grade. Runoff from the remaining area of the bridge and approximately 1,200 feet of highway will be collected in a sag vertical curve and conveyed through a storm sewer system to a di)' detention/grassy swale. The discharge will be conveyed through a series of open ditches and storm sewer system to the unnamed tributai)' on the upstream side of the railroad grade. The di)' detention/grassy swale will also receive stormwater from the SB on ramp. Runoff from the remaining highway area up to the Glenwood overpass will be conveyed to a grassy swale located off the shoulder of the NB lanes. As part of the project, stormwater runoff from the Franklin Blvd: railroad overpass and the NB off-ramp west of Riverview Avenue will be treated in a grassy swale and discharge through the existing conveyance system into the railroad ROW. Site Restoration and Compensatory Mitigation All temporai)' and permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands or other waters will require the development of a site restoration and compensatoi)' mitigation plan. This includes plans and specifications for rehabilitating the areas of temporai)' impact and mitigating unavoidable permanent impacts. The plans and specifications prepared to provide project site restoration and compensatory mitigation will follow the site restoration and compensatoi)' mitigation EPSs. Although the area required for compensatoi)' wetland mitigation cannot be determined accurately at this time, several mitigation actions are anticipated to occur for the project, including both on-site and possibly Attachment A - Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Information Page A-9 off-site mitigation. On-site restoration/mitigation will consist of replanting temporarily disturbed areas with selected native vegetation typical of southern Willamette Valley plant assemblages. The majority of on-site vegetative enhancement mitigation/site restoration is anticipated to occur north of the Willamette River within ODOT ROWand within areas of Alton Baker Parle ODOT and the parks departments have agreed upon park improvement and restoration activities through the Inter-governmental Agreement process. Additional compensatory mitigation will likely involve restoration of a concrete-lined, unnamed tributary of the Willamette River near Franklin Blvd. p.otential off-site mitigation would consist of the purchase of wetland mitigation credits at the local West Eugene Wetland Mitigation Bank. Landscaping Areas to be landscaped within the Estimated Limits of Disturbance fall into several categories. Each of these types of areas will be landscaped to provide erosion control, minimize visual impacts of the project elements, and allow adequate maintenance by Agency staff. These areas can be described as slopes steeper than 2H:1V, slopes flatter than 2H:1V, areas at soundwalls, riparian areas, disturbed wetlands, and stormwater treatment areas. The actual boundaries of areas to be landscaped are still under development. Slopes steeper than 2H:1V will be permanently seeded. Soils in these areas will be improved to prevent erosion and promote establishment. The toe of these slopes will be planted with a mix of native conifers, native deciduous trees and shrub plantings to provide visual buffering of permanently seeded slopes..1t is understood Agency maintenance will be provided in some form for slopes steeper than 2H:1V. Slopes flatter than 2H: 1V will be planted with a mix of native conifers, native deciduous trees and shrub plantings at toe of slopes to provide visual buffering of permanently seeded slopes. Some shrub plantings on slopes flatter than 2H:1 V will be provided. No planting will be done under bridges. Areas near Canoe Canal may be seeded using wildflowers as accents. Areas with overhead power lines will be permanently seeded. Areas around soundwalls will be planted to soften the appearance of the wall. Plantings may include trees, climbing plants and shrubs. The actual landscape plantings chosen should be based on input from the public with consideration given to restrictions from overhead powerlines. Temporary irrigation will likely be provided at the southwestern most soundwall near the Laurel Hill Valley neighborhood to help further establish plantings used to visually buffer the soundwall. Riparian areas along the Willamette River will be planted with a mix of native shrub and tree plantings. Areas near bike paths will be permanently seeded. Stormwater treatment areas will be planted with a mix of native shrubs, trees, and seeding. Disturbed wetlands will be restored according to the requirements of environmental permits. Excavation/Fill There would be removal of existing fill and pia cement of new fill within the Willamette River Greenway associated with the new bridges. Removal and placement of fill would be associated with the roadway section between the Canoe Canal bridges and the bridges that cross the Willamette River. When the detour bridges were constructed, a temporary easement from the Willamalane Park and Recreation District was acquired by ODOT for placement of fill associated with the roadway section between the Canoe Canal and AttachmentA - Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Information Page A-10 the Willamette River. A condition of that easement is that fill placed within it for the detour bridge be removed when the permanent replacement bridge is constructed. All fill would be placed within ODOT ROW. Some existing fill, both withi.'n the ODOT ROWand within the temporary easement, would be removed, resulting in a net reduction of fill. Current estimates for excavation and fill for the project are 95,000 cubic yards of excavation and 58,000 cubic yards of fill, resulting in a net reduction of 37,000 cubic yards offill. Pavement New paving is anticipated from about 1.500 feet north of the Canoe Canal Bridge south to about 1,500 feet south of the bridges. Additionally, the Franklin Blvd. on: and off-ramps are anticipated to be regraded and repaved. Current estimates for total impervious surtace area for the project are 19.42 acres. This is based upon the current edge of pavement lines and bridges. This estimate is not inclusive of offsite impervious areas draining into the site that are being treated for water quality. Aesthetics and Visual Performance Project elements will be developed with consideration for aesthetics. Where applicable, project elements will generally follow the guidelines contained in the OTIA III Visual Pertormance Standards. These standards will be applied to the proposed replacement bridges across Canoe Canal, proposed retaining walls, and soundwalls. The WRB is being developed without explicit consideration of the Visual Pertormance Standard and is discussed below. Willamette RiverBridge Aesthetics The Concrete Deck Arch bridge type selected for the WRB is aesthetically classic. In the historic form, the deck arch ribs are not typically slender by the structural definition. Current engineering and construction techniques enable modern concrete deck arches to be built with slender arch ribs and without transverse rib bracing, making them more sleek and uncluttered in appearance. Slenderness provides added aesthetic appeal due in part to an implicit understanding by the public that such structures, although light and graceful, are also strong and durable. This understanding has evolved by the incremental increases of noteworthy structures in the built environment that have trended toward slenderness. The deck arch design proposed for the WRB employs a relatively lightweight floor system for concrete. The system consists of a transverse floorbeam-supported deck with the floorbeams framing into longitudinal girders that span the short distances between bent columns, spandrel columns, and the crown segment of the arch ribs where the rib extrados rises above the girder soffit and blends into the girder (the "composite crown"). This system allows the superstructure to be shallow. The proposed arch ribs are slender in profile view, but deeper perpendicular to their axis than the longitudinal girders. This appearance reinforces their role aesthetically as the supporting elements of the spans. Columns are located at each arch rib end, and the remaining open spandrel space between the bents and the composite crown is divided equally by two spandrel columns. The rib shape shown in the bridge elevation view reflects a balance between minimizing structural demand and providing a smooth curvature. Further work in this regard will occur during the refinement of the design. In addition, the rib shape will.be smoothed to the extent possible after all contributing effects to rib shear , . Attachment A - Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Information Page A-11 and flexure are fully quantified, including long-term creep distortions in the ribs, lateral creep of the shaft foundations, and seismic demands. ' The main aesthetic form of the bridge should be complemented by secondary geometric aesthetideatures including details of structural elements that can be varied without adversely affecting their proportions or structural purpose in the bridge. Examples include shaping the exposed portions of shaft caps and creating architectural column cross sections. Given the public desire to have some above-deck features incorporated into the deck arch alternative, consideration of entry pylons or some sort of gateway at the bridge ends is likely to be considered as well. Tertiary aesthetic features include what are typically characterized as aesthetic "treatments" and include texturing of surfaces with form liners, insets, patterns of grooves or ridges, and coating or staining to add colors. Secondary and tertiary aesthetic features will be developed as appropriate in subsequent design phases based on additional public and community input. Roadway Illumination I Roadway lighting needs were evaluated along 1-5 at the Franklin Blvd. Interchange in Eugene (Exit 192). The construction of the WRB will affect several of the existing light poles and luminaries along the ramps at this interchange. A lighting analysis was conducted for the gore at the I 5 northbound off-ramp and the merge area for 1-5 southbound on-ramp. The purpose of the analysis was to determine the appropriate level of lighting to reinstall per the ODOT Lighting Policy and Guidelines (2003). Based on this evaluation modifications to the existing interchange roadway lighting will be provided at the 1-5/Franklin Blvd. . Interchange. Cobra-head style luminaries will be used tor the partial interchange lighting. It should be noted that the existing lighting along both ramps between Franklin Blvd. and Riverview Street will not be affected by the project and will be maintained. Aside from lighting at the merge area and the ramp terminal, existing lighting along the 1-5 southbound on-ramp will be removed. Based on the ODOT Traffic Lighting Design Manual (2003) and the AASHTO Roadway Lighting Guide (1984), the following light levels will be met for the merge area at the southbound onramp and for the gore area at the northbound off-ramp: . Average Maintained Illuminance: 1.0-1.5 foot-candles . Minimum Point Illuminance: 0.2 foot-candles ~ Uniformity Ratio: 3:1 Underdeck Lighting Permanent underdecklighiing will be required for the bicycle path under the Canoe Canal Bridge. The light placement is designed to meet the illumination standards set forth by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA)1 for walkways and bikeways: . Average Maintained Illuminance: 4.0 (night) - 10.0 (day) foot-candles . Minimum Point Illuminance: 2.0 (night) - 5.0 (day) foot-candles . Uniformity Ratio: 3:1 Attachment A ~ Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Intormation PageA-12. Vandal resistant lighting is preferred by ODOT for underpass lighting. The type of lighting currently assumed to be used for this application is the Lithonia Lighting Series VG05 32TRT HPF. Ten-foot spacing along the pathway would result in 12 lights (six per bridge deck). Temporary Roadway Illumination Due to the nature of the ramp construction process, temporary roadwaylighting will be necessary to maintain current light levels. Temporary luminaires with the same wattage, mounting heights, and lane placement will be provided along the 1-5 southbound on-ramp and the 1-5 northbound off-ramp. In total 13 luminaires would be required for the southbound onramp and three luminaires for the northbound off-ramp. Traffic Control and Mobility The existing temporary detour bridges and decommissioned bridges will be removed and replaced with twin structures over the Willamette River and Canoe Canal. The replacement and removal of the bridges will be completed in three main'traffic stages. These sfages represent major traffic shifts on the 1-5 mainline. Subordinate traffic shifts that affect traffic flow on the ramps, Franklin Blvd., or other surface streets are identified as phases within each stage. Traffic Staging Requirements and Constraints All traffic control stages require a minimum of two travel lanes in each direction on 1-5. In addition, one auxiliary lane in each direction between the Glenwood and Franklin interchange ramps will be maintained. Temporary traffic control width requirements are 12-foot travel lanes; 12-foot auxiliary lanes; 3-foot inside shoulders; 3-foot outside shoulders; and 31-100t clear width between positive barriers, which provides 4- foot outside shoulders where auxiliary lanes do not exist. The minimum clear roadway width on ramps is 19-feet. These clearances require notification to Motor Carrier Transportation Division but do not require special approval. Short term 1-5 lane closures during select hours of the day appear acceptable based on lane capacity charts. It is assumed at this time that ohly short-term closures will be allowed on Franklin Blvd., the northbound off- ramp to Franklin Blvd.,.and southbound on ramp to Franklin Blvd. As such, staged construction of the ramps rather than full-time closures will be required: The northbound off-ramp and southbound on-ramp is a partial interchange. This interchange' serves to connect 1-5 traffic south of the Willamette River to and from Franklin Blvd. west of 1-5. Access for all other movements is better served by the full movement interchange at Glenwood Blvd. The Franklin Blvd. and Glenwood Blvd.. interchanges are spaced about 1,200 feet between ramps and are connected with a continuous auxiliary lane in each direction. I.t is assumed that these auxiliary lanes will only be closed concurrently with a closure of the connecting Franklin Blvd. ramp. . The design team will evaiuate detour routes for ramp closures and the potential for longer-term closures on the ramps to reduce construction cost and time as additional traffic count information becomes available from the Agency. Full reconstruction of the ramps and 1-5 mainline will be required near the south terminus of the project due to a change in mainline profile grade, Maintaining operation of the n'orthbound offramp, southbound on- ramp, two mainline travel lanes in each direction, and one auxiliary iane in each direction dictates traffic staging for the project. Temporary mainline widening to the east, temporary northbound off-ramp widening Attachment A - Project Description and'preliminary Engineering Information Page A-13 to the west, and temporary southbound on-ramp widening to the east have been utilized to allow staged construction of the ramps and mainline. The large electrical support tower to the west of the southbound on-ramp, the tall fill slope along the west side of 1-5, and ROW restrictions northeast of the northbound off- ramp were constraints in developing the traffic staging plan. Two temporary alignments were established for traffic shifts on 1-5. The first temporary aiignment shifts traffic to the east to utilize the temporary mainline widening. The second temporary alignment is a crossover to shift traffic from the existing alignment to the proposed southbound bridge and then back to the existing alignment. This alignment is required to allow construction of the northbound bridge. These . temporary alignments use geometry based on the Safe Speed Chart for 60 mph (posted speed) and as- constructed superelevation rates. Traffic is maintained on the ramps with lane shifts on the existing and proposed horizontal alignments. Generally, short-term lane closures at night on 1-5 can be expected for traffic shifts between stages and also for final paving and tie-ins. Short-term ramp closures may be required for traffic shifts during ramp construction, demolition of the decommissioned and detour bridges, and beam placement for the new bridges. Detour plans will be developed for all traffic closures. . Traffic Stages The following discussion briefly summarizes the main traffic stages and phaseswithin each stage and also describes additionai work needed to refin'e the plan. Stage I Stage I includes the removal of the decommissioned bridge and the construction of the new bridge for southbound traffic. This stage is broken into four phases. . Phase 1 - The e~isting decommissioned WRB will be demolished and mainline 1-5 will be temporarily widened to the east. This widening occurs immediately south of the northbound off- ramp and is necessary to maintain the required travel lanes and auxiliary lane in subsequent phases. The temporary widening of 1-5 will impact the gore of the northbound off-ramp. The demolition of the' decommissioned bridge wiil require a short-term closure of the northbound offramp. It is anticipated that widening at the gore of the northbound off-ramp and moving temporary barrier around the northbound off-ramp gore will occur within this closure to minimize impacts to motorists. . Phase 2 - The traffic south of the WRB is shifted to the temporary alignment. This requires moving temporary concrete barriers and restriping. Short-term lane closures are required to establish the traffic control. It is anticipated that traffic shifts will be completed within one work shift. The southbound on-ramp is widened to the east. The work zone will be protected by temporary concrete barrier. It is anticipated that short'term closure of the ramp is required to install the temporary concrete barrier. The southbound roadway north of the WRB, the southbound WRB, and . southbound Canoe Canal Bridge will also be under construction. . Phase 3 - Traffic on the southbound on-ramp will be shifted to the east on the newly widened 'area. Temporary concrete barrier will be shifted to establish 19 feet of clear travel lane. The west side of the on-ramp will be constructed to future grade. The southbound roadway north of the WRB, the southbound WRB, and southbound Canoe Canal Bridge will also be under construction. Attachment A - Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Information Page A-14 . Phase 4 - Traffic will be routed onto the partially constructed southbound on ramp and the remainder of the on ramp will be constructed. In addition, the southbound travel lanes south of the WRB will be constructed. The southbound roadway north of the WRB, the southbound WRB, and southbound Canoe Canal Bridge will be completed. Stage II Southbound traffic will be shifted to the newly constructed southbound bridge and roadway. Northbound traffic will remain in the existing alignment across the detour bridge. The roadway south of the Willamette River between northbound and southbound traffic will be reconstructed. The east half of the new southbound bridge may provide access to the area under construction. Stage III Northbound and southbound traffic will use the southbound bridge. Stage III construction includes removal of the existing detour bridge, constructing the new northbound bridges over the Willamette River and Canoe Canal, and reconstructing the northbound off-ramp. Stage III consists of three phases. . Phase 1 - The northbound off ramp will' be widened temporarily to the west. This temporary widening is required to maintain traffic on the existing ramp while constructing the new ramp. The widening of the existing northbound off-ramp may be completed under a short-term ramp closure. It is anticipated that this work will be coordinated with the demolition of the existing detour bridge over the northbound off-ramp to minimize impacts to traffic. . Phase 2 - Traffic will be maintained on the west side of the existing northbound off-ramp while the east side of the new northbound off-ramp is constructed. The new northbound bridges over the Willamette River and Canoe Canal and the northbound roadway north of the Willamette River are under construction. ,. Phase 3 - Traffic is shifted to the partially constructed northbound off-ramp while the remainder of the northbound off-ramp is completed. The northbound travel lanes south ofthe WRB are also constructed. The new northbound bridges over the Willamette River and Canoe Canal and the northbound roadway north of the Willamette River will be completed. Bike and Pedestrian Plan A network of multi-use (bicycle and pedestrian) paths exists in the general vicinity of the project. The paths cross under the Canoe Canal Bridge and the WRB. A plan will be developed to maintain as much system connectivity as possible during construction. At least one bicycle! pedestrian crossing will be maintained under 1-5 at all times. Inter-governmental Agreements negotiated between ODOT and the local parks departments have resulted in this project including construction of bike path network modifications in the Eastgate Woodlands. Erosion Control Erosion control measures will be incorporated and'implemented during construction in accordance with a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) 1200-C permit and a Temporary Erosion And Sediment Control (TESC) Plan will be developed and implemented. Specific erosion control BMPs will be identified on final design plans and in accordance with the TESC Plan and NPDES requirements. Attachment A - Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Information PageA-15 Additional Project Construction Sign Bridge Replacement Early Work Package Sign Bridge at Sta. LS1 409+00 replacing the existing sign bridge at this location. The existing sign bridge at this location will be replaced as the structure is of insufficient length to span the new roadway. The location will be shifted approximately 50 feet to the south of the existing location to avoid conflict with foundation installation and to maintain the existing structure in service while new foundations are constructed. This structure may be installed at virtually any time during the construction. The estimated length of the new sign bridge is 157 feet, allowing the use of the ODOT standard for this installation. This' will provide sufficient length to install the proposed second lane to the NB off-ramp in the future. The west end of the sign bridge is within the same area as the Laurel Hill soundwall. There may be opportunity to combine the foundation for the sign bridge with the soundwall pilaster, or the sign bridge could be located yet another 50 feet further to the south and installed as an independent structure. . The replacement of the sign bridge at Sta. LS1 409+00 is anticipated to be CM/GC early work package. This will require an independent traffic control plan for completion of this work. Development of this traffic control plan will be further investigated upon acceptance of the sign bridge replacement as an early work package. Franklin Blvd. It is anticipated that intermittent staging/closures will be required on Franklin Blvd. during construction. Closures are required to demolish the overhead spans for the decommissioned and detour bridges, and for beam placement for the new bridges. Detour plans for these closures and traffic staging plans for intermittent traffic stagin"g are currently being developed. - Retaining Walls Several miscellaneous structures are required in support of the replacement of the WRB. Specifically, the structures addressed in this report are as follows: North Soundwall From Sta. LN1 656+75 to LN1 663+95,30 feet to 66'-6" left. It is currently proposed that this wall be constructed according to ODOT standard drawing BR740, standard precast panel soundwall. The assumption within the soundwall report is for a 720-foot-long wall that is nominally 13 to 16 feet in height above the existing roadway. Project development has placed this soundwall somewhat further from the roadway centerline than analyzed in the Noise Technical Report. To provide the same sound reduction, a taller soundwall, estimated at17 feet, is required. Verification of the final soundwall configuration will be required to assure noise reduction compliance. South Soundwall From Sta. FS1190+00 to Sta. FS1 208+60 right, along the SB onramp. Currently, the ODOT standard precast panel soundwall per ODOT standard drawing BR740 is assumed. The assumption within the soundwall report is for a wall of varying height from a minimum of 12 feet to a maximum of 16 feet in height. The majority of the wall, 73 percent, is 15 to 16 feet in height. Attachment A - Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Information Page A,16 Retaining Wall 1 Along the temporary fill slope between Sta. LN1 672+83 to LN1 678+16,97 feet to 102 feet left This wall exists within the body of the temporary embankment constructed to complete grade for the temporary detour location. As such, it is a "c~t" wall typically requiring top-down construction. This type of construction is not contained within the current version of the ODOT Retaining Waif Manual and requires a specific design for installation. In Oregon, the current form of construction mo"st,common for this sort of installation is a soldier pile wall consisting of discreet vertical elements, predrilled and installed to a required depth, commonly two times the retained height of soil. Lagging is installed progressively as soil is removed from the open face of the wall. After the wall has been fully exposed, a finish surface is applied. Given the generally urban nature of this site, a higher quality finish such as a cast-in-place concrete is the likely method. Pre-cast panels, shaped and finished shot-crete, and other methods can also be employed. The finish will be determined by stakeholders, and the installation method should be coordinated with the CM/GC. . For this location the anticipated wall is located 5 feet from the'ROW line to the east of 1-5, located approximately between Sta. LS1 373+00 to LS1 378+00, at 175 feet left. The height of the retaining wall to contain the proposed finished grade and restore/remove embankment from the temporary easement varies from zero to approximately 12 feet from north to south. This construction is best performed as part of Stage III, Phase 2 during the time when the NB WRB is being constructed. Retaining Wall 2 Located under the South Soundwall, Sta. FS1195+20 to FS1 208+60 and Sta. FS 201+50,23 feet right. This wall is proposed under or immediately adjacent to the Laurel Hill soundwall to be constructed along the SB on-ramp, line "FS". The retaining structure is required to avoid impacts to ROWand the high- tension line towers that exist along this alignment. The maximum height required approximately 10 feet in exposed height. As such, a number of options are viable for the construction. While standard ODOT gravity retaining wall and various MSE wall styles as detailed in the ODOT Relaining Waif Manual may be used, the integration of this wall with the soundwall above offers the opportunity to modify the typical soundwall foundation method to support the retaining wall in a soldier pile fashion, At" the very tallest sections, deadman anchors or soil reinforcements can be utilized to maintain an economical wall system. Aesthetic , treatments for this wall have not lJeen determined. This retaining wall must be completed during Stage I, Phase 3 of traffic control in conjunction with the soundwall construction. Retaining Wall 3 Required to retain the NB off-ramp within the limits of ROW fromSta. FN1192+75 to Sta. FN1 196+28 and Sta. FN1 200+90 to Sta. FNt 203+75, varies from approximately 52 feet left to approximately' 27 feet left. This wall exists along side the NB off-ramp alignment and is required to protect the drainage located at the base of the embankment, as well as to avoid impacts to ROW limits of the private p(operty located to the southeast of the project and the railroad property paralleling the ramp alignment. This wall exists in two sections. The first section, extending from Sta. FN 192+75 to FN 196+28, is proposed primarily to protect the railroad ROWand avoid need for easement acquisition on that property. The second section, extending from,Sta. FN 200+90 to FN 203+75, is proposed to protect the unnamed creek drainage that parallels the ramp alignment and continues through an existing pipe culvert flowing northward from approximately Sta. FN 200+90 to Sta. FN 196+28. The first section of the wall has an average height of 9 feet including 2 feet of typical embedment below the finish grade. The second section is 10 feet in average height including 2 feet of typical embedment. These are both well within the parameters of retaining wall systems detailed Attachment A - Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Information Page A,17 ., within the OOOT Retaining Wall Manual. The fill nature of these walls will lend themselves to an MSE-style installation relying on the CM/GC to select the system to be installed. Aesthetic treatments have not yet been detennined; however, it is recommended that treatment to this retaining wall adhere to standard finishes. The adjacent landowners are industrial and railroad. Bike/pedestrian paths exist to that side of. the alignment; however, those facilities are on the far side of the railroad ROWand do not provide a clear view of the retaining wall. These walls must be completed during Stage III, Phase 2 of traffic control. Retaining Wall 4 Located in the gore area between the NB off-ramp and the 1-5 main line. This wall is proposed along the . south abutment of the WRB to provide the grade separation between the finish grade for NB 1-5 and the NB off-ramp, as the ramp drops below the bridge south abutment. The wall is a maximum height at the south abutment of 24 feet, reducing to approximately 15 feet at the catch point near the south end station with the finish grade wrapping around the face at that point. The location of the retaining wall will require a significant amount of excavation for installation of an MSE wall system. Given the height of the wall, only certain proprietary systems are approved in the OOOT Retaining Wall Manual for installation at this location. To install the NB off-ramp to the proposed alignment, an existing retaining wall in the same location as the proposed wall must be removed. The excavation required for that removal will be such that the slope will be opened and this will facilitate the installation of the soil reinforcements for an MSE type system. Aesthetic treatments have not been determined. it is recommended that the aesthetic quality of this wall be considered given the high visibility of the structure to traffic that will be using the NB off-ramp. A simple form-liner level of treatment has been assumed here with a slight adjustment to the unit price for this wall. This retaining wall will be constructed coincident with the south abutment of the NB WRB approach span during Stage III, Phase 3 of traffic control. . Retaining Wall 5 Is an extended wingwall between the NB and SB bridges at the south end of the bridges. This wall is proposed along the south abutment of the WRB to act as a long wingwall between the abutment of the southbound bridge and the abutment of the northbound bridge. The wall is a maximum height of approximately 20 feet at the abutment 'of the southbound bridge, reducing to approximately 10 feet at the abutment of the northbound bridge. The location of the retaining wall will require excavation for installation of an MSE wall system. Given the height of the wall, only certain proprietary systems are approved in the OOOT Retaining Wall Manual for installation at this location. Aesthetic treatments have not been , determined. The location of this wall will mean that it will not be a prominent visual feature. Extension of Existing Culvert and Possible New Culvert Under UPRR Orainage of the unnamed creek to the east of the NB off-ramp requires some modification to the existing culvert and installation of a new culvert under the railroad. The proposal is to extend the outlet of the existing culvert approximately 124 feet to the north and establish a new outlet at that location. Open channei flow will be redirected past the outlet into a new culvert to be installed under the railroad, with the inlet at or about Sta. FN1 195+07, 103 feet Left, extending under the railroad to an outlet at or about Sta. FN1 194+32, 195 feet Left. Negotiation with the railroad, hydraulics analysis, and final design are all required to refine the location and length of this proposed culvert installation. It is assumed that the new pipe installed will be similar in size and shape to the pipe installed at the time of the detour construction; i.e., a 10' x 7' corrugated steel arch pipe countersunk and established with a constructed "natural" streambed material bottom. The new pipe under the railroad is anticipated to be similar in size to the pipe being replaced; i.e., a 72-inch corrugated round pipe, similarly established with a stream bottom. Plan Attachment A - Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Information Page A-18 sheets for this portion of the project have not yet been developed. If installed, it will result in modification to or complete elimination of a portion of the NB off-ramp Retaining Wall from Sta. FN1 192+75 to Sta. FN1 196+28, as well as modification to the size and location of the NB off-ramp Retaining Wall from Sta. FN1 200+90 to FN1 203+75. Attachment A - Project Description and Preliminary Engineering Information PageA-1g Attachment B Tax Lot Information Tax Lots Potentially Affected by Proposed Project: 1703331400600 (Wi llama lane Park) 1703334100101 (Willamalane Park) 1703334402600 (ODOT) 1703334400300 (Lane County) 1703334400100 (Oregon Department of Administrative Services) 1703334400200 (Oregon Department of Administrative Services) Attachment B - Tax Lot Information . Page B-1 " (t r..' J .. Legend o Projed Area DT""lOts City limits CITY_NAME _ Eugene Springfield -Higllways - Roads '1v!.Jfr"'dle~v. ~~dwe 'tr {~ OTIA ~l ____ Tax Lot Map FIGURE B-1A 1-5 "Nillame"e R;ver Bridge Project I OooT I City of $prinafield [)evelopmenllssues Meetina l ~ Iji"~If,,,,('lk ':P_" .~~ 'VVtr /'".-:::.. .........#1- -T- '......~ \..;.../ -.---- Legend CJ ProjedArea D Tax lots City limits CITY_NAME . Eugene Springfield - Highways - Roads Tax Lot Map FIGURE B,1 B 1-5 'Mrramelte River Bridge Project I ODOr I City ofSpnngtield DeVll/opment Issues Meeting Attachment C DIM Questions List of DIM Questions: 1. As stated previously, expedient processing of the requested permitslapprovals is critical to the Project's success. Please provide us with a processing and approval timeline and any suggestions you may have to accelerate this schedule given the nature of this project. Given the schedule constraints for this project, can the Willamette Greenway Overlay District Development, Discretionary Use, Site Plan Review, and Floodplain Overlay District Development applications be submitted concurrently? Many of the submittal requirements for the each permit/approval application require the same additional supporting documentation. Is there a submittal acceptance process that will allow ODOT to minimize the need to create multiple copies of reports and plan sets? Would the Copy of the Deed(s) and Preliminary Title Report(s), which are required for each applicable permit/approval application, be required for this project? Are there any additional permits/approvals that will be required? If so, what is the approval timeline? 2. For the Type III Willamette Greenway Overlay District Discretionary Use Approval, what specific materials and discussion should be submitted in terms of visual impact review? What are the evaluation criteria for approval? Is the area regulated strictly within the Greenway or does it include other areas as well? Can the Willamette Greenway Overlay District Development and Discretionary' Use applications be submitted concurrently for this approval? 3. Being that this is a critical transportation infrastructure project certain permit/approval submittal requirements for the Site Plan Review do not appear to apply. What elements of the Site Plan Review would/would not be required and what is the level of detail needed for permit approval? Will a Riparian Area Protection Report be."required in association with the Site Plan Review and what specific elements would be required for approval? Will a Final Site Plan Review submittal be required? Will a Tree Felling Permit be required in association with the Site Plan Review? Is a Tree Felling Permit required for tree felling within the ODOT ROW? Is a Tree Felling Permit required for tree felling within temporary easement areas used during construction? Does the total number of trees proposed to be felled include trees both within and outside of ODOT ROW? If more than five trees are felled outside ODOT ROW, what specific elements would be required for approval? 4. The submitted Drainage and Utility plan sheets provide the conceptual drainage quantity/quality treatment as understood at the time of this submittal. In regard to the Stormwater Management System Study and Grading, Paving, and Stormwater Management Plan required for the Site Plan Review, what specific elements will be required for approval? 5. For the Floodplain Overlay District Development Permit, the existing conditions analysis is based on the detour bridge. There will be a temporary rise in conditions during construction as a result of the temporary work bridges. It may not be possible to consider temporary effects during construction; the analysis is based on permanent effects to the Willamelle River floodway by replacement of the bridges. Will this be acceptable to the City of Springfield for approval? What specific elements will be required for approval? What information will be required regarding Watercourse Alteration Review? What is required for the associated Land and Drainage Alteration Permit? Attachment C - DIM Questions Page C,1 .. Attachment D Existing and Proposed Bridge Graphics, Site Plan, and Design Plans (30 Percent Design) -- '1(/i;1!tJ1lelfe ~vel' .rldge Existing 1-5 Decommissioned Bridge and Detour Bridge (Looking East) Figure D.1A 1-5 Willamette River Bridge Project I OOOT I City of Springfield Development Issues Meeting 011A ---- -:.......~ . ..~...:.. -' .~ .-....";. '. ......--..- ... ,.--..-- -' '-'. '- -, . ~.~-~~'~~:'~-~~~_.~.. . :~--:.::.:..-. -- OTIA - Visual Rendering 1-5 Replacement Bridges (Looking East) Figure 0-1B 1,5 Willamette River Bridge Project I ODOT I City of Springfield Development Issues Meeting ~$tllJd& ~v. Brtdge 'tr ~J/, ~#;JlJJelfe :lQ' "1V~ridge tit,. Visual Rendering 1-5 Replacement Bridges (Looking East) Figure D.1C 1-5 Willamette River Bridge Project I DOOr I C~y of Springfield Development Issues Meeting 011A ---- A./ Proposed design f3J Staging areas 'I", - ~ Parks (in project area) f' ~ Highways /'./ Major roads LJ Wllamette River Greenway o Cities ,J o ~:~;~~.: :~:~~':, "-~ "-~.C) . '. i " '!,,";',8.t,; ,~, ',:;",.... .g. ....,:J ~~'f~:::~~~~~~..~',-tcy../l. :. ' .~ 1 ~l;1 ;t:I.~;~ : Dt;. '-:-~':<:i'." ,. t ;,:~~.~, :,~:'~,::b . .i:.'. ,l"..-,-,..:_ .. r.. ~.'.l ...~-.....,~ l"l ~ \ "" -~;~~~;):,;.,::",",,:>~.~,;, . >.: //;z, '" 'h';l1I-0X~~i>"', . / / /,?';,;,/;.>};/ ~;('/,/@,/,~,.':"/, "/',' " '//'c:';'/' '/~/i"'/,':":' /:::. .' "-:'/";~.'~7::?""",,,~, '/_','''0 ...., ...._.,~j;./..%z;:>......%>.J/....':'.,...,...~ '</7%" ./"/,,/'/, '....,;'.." ':/.,/."'/,~.,... r~ /~'f:7~ '. ~;'i~/".~.,. ",,:'>//.-> < "f ~~/;~1;'--1.~>~z.::; /j~::/.i::: ", .". ~~,,;:';',~;>;.;~/.~/.~;:~:~~:,~:~ _ /,,1/ '/// /:.-:~/.///,:..,/,////,>/_..../:-, 'j' /.0/'//' /, '''~:/.~,." .'. ",' /, ,// l-....."r-t-l'...%,~,... .'~ /'/ (~$;>;'<:~~ / ~/,,/,"'ZZ ;Z',:/h /. '.'. -//f/' _y # .~: 'eo-';-' - ~/,~.~( '0',*;'; :?:' I i .t.... . ...:, .. .. . 'II! " -f,'J /I~. ".&4 ~.. ....:... '-, ~ t 1[..Jf _ '.r; . ! , I t \ f e '4 it , .. '1, \. ,,, '" '" ''''' I Ttr ...- !.~.."- "" .) '1t!,;"r<,'<:;,./ Site Plan Map - AGlflEO-2 @ m.1A. 1-S\WI......Rn8rllVt~ I (IXlT Il:t1d~o..""""A._...~Momo . 'C~"" .._.....,...."",~<;"__,, '-"~"'~;' ...~ DESIGN PLANS FIGURE D-3 ' I~ S~EET"" I 1 I JA INDEX OF SHEETS DESCRIPTION Title Sheet Index Of Sheets Cont'd. & Std. Oro. Nos. ST A TIE DJEJ[])j~_R TMENT OIP OF OREGON TRA_NSPOR 1["A TJrON I'LANS 'FOR PROPOSED PROJECT GRADING, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURES; PAVING & SIGNING ,. 1-5: WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE - BUNDLE 220 PACIFIC HIGHWAY BlEGINNING OF' PROJECT STA~ "LN1" 655+68.65 (M.P. 193.5) STA, "LS1" 355+73.92 La I ] ~ ~~~ .~. plO~1' ~ ..' \\\ . ~ . -t oo~::t Ji -I- ! ~-o ~ i '.' , , I~' .! ;J ~z T. 17, 18 S., R. 3 W.. W.M. /' \ LANE COUNTY MARCH 2009 i-~- :t " , ,P:". 'P' ',; ~ . .0 f .5 . 9 ","",USTA.o:r ,Il ill6 ""'ERVIOW Sf , ~ 3 ,. " ,!: ~ #=- 9/22/2003 I: \Pr-ojec+s\019\OI9095 \RoOdwoy\D~iive..abl es\Drqft Dop\Bose ^I ign 6' Structur-e\ 1L125':H_B5_1. tsl 02:09 P.M -' eo 1/r nv-n ~,,~, -;"', Overall Length Of Project - 1.08 -Miles ATTENTION' Oregon Law Requires You To Follow Rules Adopted By The Oregon Utility Notificotion Center. Those Rules Are Sat Forth In OAR 952-001-0010 Throu~h OAR 952-001-0090. You May Obtain Copies Of The Rules By Calling The Center. (Note: The Telephone Number For The Oregon Utility Center Is (503) 232-1987.) 4-' /,nf; 4' 4<- 4<- 4'4'4< 4< LET'S ALL ",f; , ~. WORK TOGETHER ',6 "'/ cO MAKE THIS, /.' .I';'~ JOB SAFE -11' ~? 4';,$;4'.6'4'4'4' 4<: PLANS PREPARED FOR OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . ~cwrico:IJ2()COIJNm'r'alLJliOIl!5UTEIIX6ElXj&;f,(YIfGON!Jl40I-6OlF ,: CONSULnNG .saJ5oW~,-.YSIil:MQS1Jf{EI2Q/Al<Eosm-GQOfIf,GOfl9l/XJ5--4l{fJ ....- ENGINEERS ,= MI5SIOII Smf.ET Sf, 5'UfffIW SAJEM. fJ1EG!Jt19m2-1Zi5 ~ itW,occta::wm.. ~133SP(RAfICR1VEMff'FOflJ.OfIfWl91S(U-5<'07 OREGON.TRANSPORrATION COMMISSION Gail Achte,mon Michael Nelson Janice '/,ilsan 1,lan Brown David Lohman Matt~ew L. Garren CHAIR VICE-CHAIR CON~ISS 10l'lEI; C()~MISSIOl'lrR COMIJISSIONER UIRECTOROFTRANSf'ORTATION These pians were developed.using OOOT design standards: Exceptions to these standards, if any, have been submitted and approved by, the ODOT Chief Engineer or their delegated authority. Bt:_ ,Signature & date LAWRENCE H. FOX - PROJECT MANAGER Print name and title C:oncurrence by ODOT Chief Engineer ".5: WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE. BUNDLE 220 'PACIFIC HIGHWAY LANE COUNTY FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION PROJECT NUMBER SHEET NO. OREGON DIVISION x-xxx- XXXXIXXXI File No. -I r. '. . DRAINAGE PLANS r <" . ~ Sec. 33, T. 17 S., R. 3 W., W.M. - z --: 8 Const. compost amended filter strips , r z '~~Im . . ..... ::: .:::~ ..........'" ~===~ ::: :::G') '-''''0 0101-" 0101 ... ...~ .....O'l~ '-'!'bo \ocnc... 1\)0:'" q ~ Z , , ---.. [. "LN'! " LINE ~ ()) ()) ()) i. E ....,.-.........--., _ r' ~_ t' E~ .-..---..-..:, C .. ,~. C __ A E ___,,_,.__.,__ __" ___ ~ [_..._ , + C .------------0--- R~_--.~'~:~-~~::L t -.-----,~.='--~~.f;,... ..~,--..'--...-----...~. '. t'" '-.. :..: . -, ,: - '...._..,.. '......._......._"' . lo [ ._.........'...-........--_-....-....-.. ...... .r,rOO. _._.___.______.__ _ A E... __ _ .._ _~_ ~ (""_ ~'~' _ _ -.:.-,',;."=~~' --,,/ 0 ,...">.- ...-.--.".--x."...-----___.".___ -, " ,. . ',. "Y:C. ." "..: E :,..;.::-R/W--:-~-:::-:;.AJ:-';~ c;': -_"''';';::J'--'. , t.:.-h'i^ -. -. ~~~:,:,:,,~;;";5"e..~~ .. ~ .. ..;u i ~~ _ .E-'c~~ ~ c!,.-=---'C- - :=cc;.c;;~~~~:- 1= .-.- ---~ - -=-~-~---"~~.=~~~=--. ."-~"::;:o""'--.:.:.:."::"".:..:'.';::=;.,:~.=::""-"":.::_=,=_="::.::::o.__::_-_~- ~ ~ _______=__'.. I I ." I _ _-*~~*-- < ~~c~~=~_-~-=.~_=:::::~:.-=.~~-=_~:,~: - -_~~ ~~:~~C:--H~-~~~~~:~_\::~~_~-=-,~_~:~~~~,--~:~~~=::,:=--: ~:7'~-~~<~~~- - -,'~~~~_, ~~? -==~7 . ~~_~-==-~=~ R/W ~~~f~~~~~~-~l~: ~~~.7~J:~k7,~#~~--1: ~;;\:"~~"~..~~ ~:;~ ~'3' ,". ~,._.. "-..:_,.~".t.il_..~~ ~". :--~\-~f~; :~~. ,l\;~..,;;i,~,,:-..:,-.~-~'~tt;l~~'f.,~~~~~if:-~..~ ... . .. , r ,. , (/). (/) CatCh line ~ ~ uLSI" LINE ~I ~-,\ C - -A C -.------ A r:: ___. =:-"'"-====="-===-=.=....-.,,.... VJ Ul o + o o ~ VJ Ul Ul + o o VJ ()) o +- o o - - ----- 1r OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~ Ca;IoIOlIOIIo::I< ltVCQIflRYaJJ!JfIOAD.SVTEtfX8EUGENE. CifEGC1oI914fJ1-8JlS ,: CONSUlJlNG SOO5 sw ~ R04l1 SUrrEl20 LMF GlS'WEGQ 0REGaV 9~ .....- ENGINEERS ?ZJ5IASS'ONS~SE, SUTEIfXJSI'li.M, OIEGONfI13R-l<'95 ~ ..-<:tJ!I';W77 /335PrX'lARur.f..lElml:lOREGON!Ji'!i04.s:?Ol 1-5' WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE - BUNDLE 220 PACIFIC HIGHWAY LANE COUNTY Design T eom LeadGr:- - Jerry Lane Desiqned By - Jim Kent Dro'fted By - Blake Phillips DU'INAGE I UTILITIES SHEET NO. 3A-3 I:\Projec"l's\019\Oi9095\Roadwoy\Deliv€1"ables\Dr-oft Dap\Bose Align 5' Structure\111259f _B6_311<~.drl 9/22/2008 02:09 PM File No. - .- - Sec. 33, T. 17 S., R. 3 W., W.M. " ., 0) o Canst, compost amended filter strips - z: -: , .i <, Canst. bioswale/infiltration ditch Canst. outfall to Canoe Canal ./ '. ,.::= i ' .I Z ,r;: / ~ \ ~. '. j ! r '~r \ ~(; "- \ _ _~] 't;, Z l:" ~ r "<,..) ~.~.\. Calcl, line f I'"j ~ L J 1 ,-1 / ~ " '/ ~ )( f \. .;~~ (<<A~~~~~_~~_\, (_"~ ,~';{?::'j, ,..J._;.J-' ~ .., , --~-,_._--,- r) 01,. 0 . , ~-'c r- rj' ' ? 'u..:r' eose ~ I _ __--.J I ? ) 01' f' " ,1.~ ~;-, -:..-" ',;,_....: ,J , . Je.mp---=- v' ~ ~r ~~r .",." ). ~ / ,,] ___. __U,,--- .=1;.:=<:-~"~I'\':?~~:'~:8::f';:~f::~E;{-:;~t"t-..~~~;~;;"c:Z::'/':_~::.~~c--:0 ~ /"',,, I 0 _..~'~~."--::--":" -".: ^'.c...:=:'-"'--'C-",-.~ "~" ..." I . \1' 'I ". '{, I I" 0 ~==-= 00+<:=' /~ ~. _ f~___ H [ ......~~:,'''-I;~: I, I, --1--- ~- - ~~ cc".,.... "~~"~':~~~~:~'~~'--~~~--:T;~;~~~---" j ~~:~__; ,-- r,_~," :-'_'__':__::"~"'~I~-_~:~=I\~I,:=..Li,.'.\-.,.:...q;:;:S~.~II~~~~" f ._ R/W:~: ~, I 2:~~,_ t, ;-::,'~'~1;\j: '- "... .. - ~~;~~--~~~:~-~~Ji.,:~~.~~~ ~I~===-~:,.:.,~~r::::::~~", _ __...~-->t.J--~... -;f~~,"""-?i-~L.=--""lf""""-~;~7-i NE .. \ ,- ---I~'" I!.J.~/ I- :--'-i~'- ~o-:::-_::-:-~---=,;;:-~ ~ . -,-=--,~---...... . , __~ .",...--~~- ::\ ! in I~ ."'--~ ____~...~"'_-=;-::::.-.~-f-,-'- . ;,:::-,-. -.-.. _rIL", "'"1"" ~~- ,.- I PAClEJC HW'L._JJ 51 N.S. .,_~---------~---'-' I. .,-' t' 1- ~-----;;':~-,,-;';;'~,,-~-,jr" -"'"---~ ....--~~~-.~- ."'-_ -~~:...~ -___ j HI {" I I 0) Const. bioswole/infiltration ditch Const. outfall fa Wilfomette River I-'ALlf-ICHWY.(I-I-.ll.....,_H_ ~"""'~ '..., IIr Ii _-~'- J jl ;i.'----=---< .'1 --- '" - 1--~~~" ~~~b r:';i~"~~;",-,.....~;-=c;;[~~~'~:L~;'~~;;:~~~:;,~:--:::. I'fli;,j~:i;i~,::,ic~~,::::::~:::~::": ~'1!~0:,.'>:''i:!'4'; /':-J, r..,,'_"_...;'_'~:._ ..... . " ,", -V.._, Cal," I", -, ' !(~;;. \ i~ _ ,-;~11!'i0\.,," : I,,' ,:'.:t''tfif:;{(;i~b/';i (~~' ':j;~~;t;V,il~ ~,..-... -' ,',}j (I'I,,~, ~.-~__ -r _L~ 4 ' .... .t,.... ....,.... --_ ') " "..\,. ~ ._,';.~<;; /.i. ~- r I ,',,,~\ \ ,..:J ~~r~: ~~~'~:.-... ~-'~~'J ---'~~H----':'~----u:.'::;,:-:;"---_..- "' ",f "f;--'::.' j-1;E---,':--" (/) F_....s.~.l:~itL .. f! ~~ ;',. C~~'I,:;:""__,",, __ ,'"" .,.,,~/W '--.J . , \_'.: :.~o:~:, .:_~-- J:~2. CC ;-~ . - '~~~- ;..:==~ ':;~'"c_-~.... "~'3';i-'~=~f~;-;~~;,~;:-;";;~::::~Ei: ; C2) 0 ';", { - 3 O. 0 .~~~=--._- - -- - -=---r- "'"_.......;-';',~ '=.=l""'='-.~'~--==.c=.'-'.'-'.,,~=~.,,'~,"-;.,. ~""'"'~-""'~'.p";;:'- , ~-- - . , , J'" UJ ()") o + o o R/W 7 --..f-~-_..-_. )- ---Pi ~,. -----;'~~ f~ ( , , -~~-'/--'" ! ( l ,/ / Of'" i ( i / /" , , , / ., ., ;' " .' .I i i / " 1/ 7t= OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION " . ~0IIar.!/2(}caNrRYQ1.fJ,<;tWl!UTEIfXEE1G5'IC(Y8]l:N9T~/_ I: CONSI/lJ1NG $;tl5,\W,w;.\lXlWS~S/JflFIZJUlKEOSl-\ffiQCR:GCN911XJ5.4;'B8 ....- ENGINEERS 2ZJ5 ~ STfEET SE, S/JTf 100 S4lE.I. (R:GQN !P3J:!.12J6 ~ _1b1c.am I335PCY'1.Nl{BYfIlBJR:H],aa;tfl91$)1052W H' WlllAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE - BUNDLE 220 PACIFIC' HIGHWAY LANE COUNTY Design T eom leader - Jerry lone Designed By - Jim Kent Drafted By BlOKe Phillips SHEET "0. DRAINAGE. I UTILITIES 4A-3 I: \P,ojecTs\019\01909S\Roodwoy\Del iverobl es\Droft DOP\8ase AI ign 6' Structure\ 1'1259f _S6_<1A-3. drl 912212008 02,09 PM File No. ... :z: :.: " .1- I .. R/w ()") --.j (Jl + . 0 .'-0........... :1 \" -~"~-"!'" _..".,,-~,--_.;.---~" --, .. """, '''''_,C. -..~_'._..r.~-:~:~~::,_~~~"~_m:::~_v::____::.. "",-, "'r.r,.v:v.~ ;.... R:wT :-,~,~;t ".-) ," See; 33, T. 17 S., R. 3 W., W.M. ~ ,- Z ~y ~ Z ~ ~ (! \t'. c_u__ ()") co .'_~ A t. 0:.______ + .0 o LINE .' r-~rr"-,-- "'?? _ _ --"'---~J' :, ,'" --.~ ~ --.-.--..." E ------.---- c "LN1" , 1\ , -5) N.tJ. \\ ,T 47"0';';'."- I cO';i';;"-l J,::\--" ,. ,_c.._.":c;,;;,."_~=__,___,,-,,,",,_" ".~_ ;" ~ p ~ co, ~ ~ co, '" " t;] ~ , ._.-----'-".~- .""'." ,- .. (J) .. CD Ul .CC---=_ + o o " i (1 .".. _._n_n_ -,-_.-.----~ -,.-,.- I I __ :'ACIFIC HWY. (1-5) S.B. ,-..'lJ'..--~---';::::;;=::-n--;,;=::::. :::;._____.~.__.. .. ~---"'- , - . 'n ' ,.,---...---.."-.-- . ."-;'-.n:::.,::;;:=_;,:=_=_~"_~ ,_","'i='--- "~~I'C"" l' ; .. I\.,J _.-..~ ... , j'-, ~. ;-;~ '. --''''-''''', if ? .",J'.;{~!~'., :{~~~ "1 ~~-~""--.,' ,., - .. _\--c_,~_ ~"LS1" LINE ==. .,,'C-,'"". , " i~~_,\ " <~" } :{~ 'r7 " ,,' ,7<\) , r' : (/) r~ ~li~;!'l,., :._r~5:;,,-''-- \~--') Per; .,~e.- - R:(W~J, .-< Ie,::.:} ':-; ,~ ~ .- .".- , , I'; " , , ---""^...,; 10,. ..."... \: '., "", .' ."-. "- '-.. 'i' 1:\P,a'jects\Oi9\Oi9095\Rooc,woy\Delive,able.s\D,ofi- Dop\Base i\ligrl 0: Structure\1<1259f _B5_5A-3.dri 9/2212008 02:09 PM ~"'-...":'" CD , \ , r' z Canst. bioswofe/infiftration ditch Canst. outfall to Willameffe River '\ " ( ',"'-{ -n ?J 1> Z 'r. r Z OJ r <: CJ ) , , ,\",: / '''''~;''-',~>,'~<c'':::::"'-_': .h" >V '.' 'il _. ";~' i!iw~_: ."!.. . ~ i\ .. --'--1-- 11\ i; j :0",,- ',',! ., 1,,<: ~"'Io,';- 'l''-'C'' r' (/) "'(" ~ 2;3 - - - - - - - - -p.j--;','_.-;"'l,-; Ul +.. o o ...-..... -,r-OREGONDEPARTMENT OF tRANSPORTATION ~ Corw<a1.OOce:92fJCOUNmYCWBfICIAD..S!JflEI(XIJEUGENE, OFEGCN914fJ1-aKn I: .CONSUlJlNG 5f){J5SWMEA~~a SUffEliJJl.AKEGl\'IIfGQ 0REG0N91O.J5--e88 .-.,.- ENGINEERS 22JSMISSIONSmEErSE, Sf.,;rEIIXlSAlEM. OPEGffl9r.xJ2-129S ~ _~<rnl 13:l5I'OPtMOOIl'EIllEDFCfiQCfH]I)N!I7504--38J1 H' WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE . BUNDLE 220 PACIFIC HIGHWAY LANE COUNTY Design Team leader - Jerr-y lone Designed By. - Jim Kent O,'ofted By -- Blake Phillips SHEET NO. D R A I NAG E aUT IL I TIE'S 5A-3 .' Fife No. .' CD Co st bosw I dth // Sec. 33,T. 17S., R.3W.,W.M, ,/ / "T1z' ':' ...~ 1 o ":,;;',ro":";;'"U"'''_ / / ~/,'?i/~~//' ",/c ~ g: ."~ R/N':~ o Const bioswale/dry detention pond --., ~ r' \' ," ~,-. \ ),.),:\t"r~:iL.~..".. <~c~~.J~."~,,\'i"-:~"'" . /- / -./ 0 + -.., . . 3, _. ,. ..... "'::?,;,. - j' ;,,' ' /- >11 ~;/\~/ ,c ~__O~l',..--,~ k' ___ ..' ,_,.'j; --,""'t ....:4-,:.....L_ _"-,,,\.,\~' "'~--'--...',;.;.. ',. - '7 '~.../)- ~ 0 ..,. -- . t, ---. ~ ~t, ;: ~l; ,--/-;/ ~"...{\ - )- /::;;/(J) ?;",/ \ _ -" -- __ ------~ - ,.-",,~ .......i,_,.'...'.,..._.._..,jl.'_.__ ~..,i.f.r":.!'1'."".-\--...(oSi._...~,...,.I.\...._..-.:.:..,.....~"..~..N.. 1 n LINE'i:-;;/'< /b_.'.ctff~-".(-~/;'.'~ ;"! . ~_::,~:-..-:.. __ ....:_,~ ~___~~;~~c.,:,,~:~;;,,;-,-- ". . '.- "_ ":''li: r"' "--, "--'-.",,;, , , "'" / ,,- / r;< > ~I- - + _ J 1 \ ~ ~-" ~ ~ -..ou...-,-'._ ___... ._.._....--',_. . '" '.'J'-- '+ ....\ '....7.... '- -,.._. ~.,.c ".: ,/,,' ,':'-/\/ //' Q. ' ""'~':-'~_ __~~C::S ,__,.c ',',' _ _"_ _ .-,-=,- ~-. ..=----U"-"---....._ ' -j . \ i~i "'--~/g.:-'...-f,\\,. .. : ',._.':'/ ,j." d/,:'~;/<i'I;"7' <::) ~~~y---;'"~ :~~~~~~~.:---J-.'-"- C"'c/:~'c~L'il"-~':;"""."\-' _=_,,,=_ ====="== ;_- ]f. "-'. '. -<;: '/.7 ./ '" 0 /.;;- -:?"~"'-'-"---.- ---' - ;;..--~ ~~ '. ~ _______________ " "" ,,,. l'~< .....,y<=~~ ,. - #,' ./ , ' -I' ,/' __..~"". ,~ "'><:<<'-~. - __ 1/ ~ ~ . _ ...,=","" =_ "" _ , , ~ ""./' /;/ ~~/ 0 ' .F - '~o;P~~ - '---:"-'j, . --- - -=-=~"''':::''-~- -, k"~"q'-"k ,,> / ,'" / ' ~ p~~ _..-:_. __""."'___",~""",~ _ ____..-~-- _ _ <-.. "l 1. I- C(\".-"".,,,, / --,-../. //" /' " __ =&;.---~ Yi " -'. -~ "(f'~r1=1- c" ....'c,~~-~:':!z:;:;~f';,y,~: ~~:,/ .. "C^''''''''' """JL~'\ .~..~ _~~~_ .~==~ ";;1i:~-,: "<'.=~,/ ~ -;-.: _.:~~~~~c'~ -/. '~~x": ~S;;iV ~_=:.' ,-- '.' . -#--....~ -, ~~': ~~ . _~ -------- ~ " ~- '-/'-;'''"".0.__-/.' ,," '"',, c /~,_/.' ~ d.' ~ <..",,'.-'.,;(', ~",<, .. -5D-,-a I ~_ ~, .___-~>/' ;.)./':~: ~/N /1- /._ :;/:', __ _,__' .' PAUl-Ie HWJ'Jl_ . - .~- n L S 1" L I N E , =-~=",,~~-';===-'=~ I I ' ,r-" ~ fi f, (J) ;, ":-=1'.---==.:.-;./ -- - ~'_~ i ..". r,,' ~-,~1+. --~ jf~ co {////;/ Yv<///:I' ' ,,''-,(,)7 J "z ~--,:,_,,<cdtctJ!ine.~'_,_./. ~~ . -~ ,:; ',.'-' >' ~::<~~//;/~~<:~<':.<>'" ~i:~:' ~ C~1{" ...........': ~ 6;Y-:::~ , ' , / ' :-:"~~ </' ,/..' {. ;;:-..., 1f';<. .,""'" /.:' <;=> 7" - .', ~:;7 "" /:,/'// 0 // &f.,/ / / ;--"/ /_ /, /" ~ _, ,h ',1, , .' " '/ /(' ;<:--' -'~;I:/' L. ',' C /2f .' ~", ./' .--' ,,/ / / "/ A, '/ " /': - / ,~ ,. ;:/" ""- 0> -- t.. ~ -' .' h-', ,./ / - 'V,' /"/ ~>/ ., ,..,/,',r/ , , ./' .?' J " ".,/, / ",/ / -"OJ / "/ _' '/ /; . /:~//I ". ~ - /' y- "" .' -,:,{':"-'--'~'~'";:'~:,'=,.:," >>"'f"/ -/~',,{- '7/: 4,.' .",'./ .': 2..;;7;,' . -, -- ", ."- -'..- .', .- "/, VO' /~/. ' '/' . ..- ",;:: -;" ; ~:o ,: //'/// /7......# .,Ox'0,' Ji""c</' r--' ...;::';;:;; -,,'- 1'-- -r -~;;/f~<~:.::~:~"".~/9qd~/ ,,', -;Ah.,," CO'Ohb"'fiYA '~'-::"'"...,.'.':_''' '.."'.' ,.4//. :/,F' */~<:"':'.:.~'f':'~ ':" ,C"FN1'U L'I"NE .@. I '.' ..!1). ',-," '/ // ""'.~ '. '-. . ~I ri:~> ~~<c:/) # ,,.i"'" ..~' ,.i" . 'I>')'///,' /;" / 0Ji-y ~''):\ '\\ , "~/~":~:'.<~ >p~~::y:~(,,/{/" , . ~;:.;?/ ..' ,.' 4.; .' .;Y " s('(' C<f J'. .,' ' . S C..y /..-' . ..y('(';-<>/V,~. .-,:. 0-<( <::' '7 r--::2::": --- \\ .;.1; ~';::, R/W' 7r OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~ ~OffiCll:fJ;!()Coi..iNim'(W8RONJ. StJ/TE11XBE/X;fJIE.()IEGON9140J4W ,. CONSUlJTNG 5aJ55W!.fE:.AWltSR04l! S!JrTEUOLAl<E(lS'l1ffiQ CiREGON9~88 ~- ENGINEERS msMiSSlONSmEETSE.'SlJIlEIfX)S'J.Df, OiEGON97.KJ2-fi'9S . ~ -rtlil";,wn f335PfJPlMOO!"rFI.fHJFC<<J./YIEGO'I91SJ4&O! :2, H' WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE - BUNDLE 220 PACIFIC HIGHWAY R/w LANE COUNTY Desi<;Jn Team leader - Jerry lane Designed By - Jim Kent Drafted By - Blake Phillips DR'AINAGE I UTILITIES SHEET NO. 6A-3 I: \Projects\019\OI9095\Road\lloy\Del ive;-obles\Orott Dop\Bose 1".1 ign 6' Structure\ \t.12S9f _BEd;A- 3.drl 9/22/2008 02:09 PM File No. _.(~..~;:~~;~~:...-:.;;~ :i ';: 1///!. ;~ j : ,/1 /1 ~".J' h'.' / ..:::;cl/,', ... .ti/~ ;.i/"?Cj'! /i . ;>,;>r:"f j?;;1f':0.- A ~("(' ,,' /:J} ,"J ...<;[- j r:, it?? N{/ I;';>~ '~i7. s: ;' 'Ii'll /.\\01-', 'I-~// lV 111 .7 X%'4l'r;Y('r- ./ /j~ ' ~~~/~.' I ,. / Y ,.;s",!. /<1; //.'4" "'~" // \... L, <...: l' v'" "JJI:'-f,(?v'~I'/'rj, /al~~.;:' "r t:' 'I Iv! ,,"~, ./ ~/_.1 )....'1 \,:.....1/ .,' I /'.~; "/- :,'// i" \'"y / u4 Ci(c-',_" ...,/.:::-,;,11;7 11:"!j{ } ,f,e::..Y.,t ,Ii " .. ~"/A' " . ';YBa- _ ',0 I '!;', , ~ "r W ii-^? /" i';t' ,'" '~v .CI(6:{]:..-'<..../ .:l}i~!f.-./ .,:/;/ !~f""'<;~P i /;,-~. 7---:'/' .B/i(c-" A";' " ," I I'I{/i" ,",,, ~ "... '''<'S':''o:.__... '(~._,,;~rH ~':;:~'. "...". j// >~f ~.;./>' . P Jl~/ T;.;;;. ,/'~' ('.'> ..F//OCf.'2J.,>'0-"'."'" ,II \:",,_ ../'.' . ./..'. 'J" ,j/' . 1/ /y ;...'.,._,....~J .' ~........"---~.;;-7;JY?-':)...,l/~~>.';: -I, /1"'/"'/:1,";; 1/' 1:'/,? "~r)'~..},..) / .;/ ..... T~\;..,''''': !~f...!(" ,. /;~" .,,/' //>/41 ", ",/::", ~c:; . /~ , ' , ,''>, ,'Or r' .Y"./" ,,)',r., / / ,. 'i.}/~" ).. ~/,' /.,,- //.<' . :', /,. / J ,.\.' " .r / /1 /"r i! ,. !.' '.L ;/' .c- ..~ J /;./ ./~(: . ~~~> ,;~~/>;;;j/ II . '?/11' ';(,:,1' .-t #(Q,~-'~~~';' .':. ~,J~.' } .",- .- '"',-; ) 1 . , ,,>:: I/' /{.' 't <F . fl.. ~~.;?,~ /<i:-.-:t: "if ,.//. /::/ // ;:..,-r',-' //~' )';, ':~/' I "I ::d )/'iI.;"T "b / .~, /l:~";;~'";/ /-~~. / ~r' '.....r.,. I '1,,; '::.:./ :;--/ '/,"!' ,~// :Ii "lcY--' ;/' # -,/,,~- ~, f': ,. , ,,' ~ L' .'/' -, :.,~ 'I _,J /"..- \ " ii'" .',,','./ ',.,-:..' , <II I'..i" v, .", ... ~fJ' ' ~, .r,. f: /.._\ L ~/ /If/ /? _(:~.>}t,. ~,~~~:' ~I } ),:{.{, f'~ "R?): ~/?~( ,,- / '. /', .j"I~"" , .. -'-."-(,..:,-' ;;' 7','..;" .f';(-~"'l', 1.1..../t ij .'-~ oioif '/ ~ 17"/-'''''/ ..J;,(".t: /'y ~//,<;Al',:/ ').L '1. ':1 i,)"" 'l""';.o 1:<', / / ,{:/. // /~/)7',/;i:;-. J,.r."r';I"l!lt~':. d;;"~/r7'// ~\:~:" r. ,f' ~,.,,.,. 'f :>, ,. """"'. r " .. '~~'i_!'''' f:r-~ /: f"" ,- ,;!r;,..<,'- ',.,1 --." /' U/': ;'" /""y,i;: , j<V' "" >.' , " Ii!", . '"' 7' / - / r ..F ',.:> { ,,- , :,.' /..'/ ,'-' " b"'lj't, "..'. :; ',. /' '6'"".( ,'t/ . ,r < . /'..J' ,,/ 'i'f'~"'0"" K.'" ' /. ,-;., : '/ ;> :~r .,',;/ I' ,1."< ~ \ '! -<,' y" s: ,/ /' ,'- ,,:.,.J' ': ,f,',---.{' '''-'''''' '(' ,/ ". .of! /.. >< . .J ,'.> ,-- """ '<,. 'j , ~ ('."1 1;;1 ... ';1 -, ", . 0 ,Zc,') (,:<,~,':?,.;/;/ ,:<' :" ~'''/' ,"",','. /;/ 0 .z) ,.. l"'., j'.fj' /' . / ,'j //_J.: .t /~/:-.:,-~_/~~::o /._.._, .. li ~~~It. ,/. ,/ ',,_.' ,,: ;,/ / /' ::l:( )l!i d "F Sl " .1 ,if f" ..., ", LINE :,.'".'., ,: ri'" ,/;;, - i ;i; r' J" i' , i/ .,..,)'l;? ;,(:;/ , tfi (( ,.1 .' f ...;.l >'::-"J /.'.: l ~. l 'r ..) If ) ,l:~~: f ."(-\ ) /' .J! ,'" l ). l - -;:;:::- ~ 0' 2: ,. !:: /:.; ~ ~ '" '" / ? " I .) ,j" ~ -" .\ , , -) -.,-,. (i -.-.-.--- -.----..-.1..,. // " . _,_.J_~.._, i ../ , I Sec. 33, T. 17 S., R. 3 W., W.M. " i / VJ' I " .I iiTr; '/,;). //:"''-' i{.~", .;' / '.1' /1 r , y,J-'-; }) .' .J ~, ".1' . \....-'/ :<-' .; 1 ))' (': j~.-) ,}. :, ,,:1 ". {' J "., J -' _.~ II jl Ii ../ l' .7 .. fI ;J P " r' ". i ";"L j'.^' ,]0. f i , ~''', ./ JA: f \ I'" (or'""] I , '5! r\v 7 " . ~ or, 'c )1 ., '.,.) 7 9~-~0 ...1 " f I I / ! i F- .'; /i " ': ': If I: \Project"s\019\019095\Roodwoy\Oel iverobl es\O.ofi" Elop\3ose AI ign. 6' Structure\ 14259f _3Ei_EiA-4.drl 9/22/2008 02,09 P'1 0- See sM. 6A- J. note 1 Const. bioswole ditch 7t= OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~' . Cor~.OlICl1;IJa)COUNmrCWBilO'1a:;UTElfXXJtuGENE.0fEG()N9Nf)I.f;lH} I: CONSI/1IING ~SW~fitl.\aswrcllf}tME~OII!:GCW9l1J35-4.?68 ~. fflGWEERS Z?J5M1SSD1SlF€ET5ESUTElaJ~OIRXl'/IP3JMi?95 ~ _GOO::.am 1335 KRAll Ofrlt; /JEJJftR1 a8JCN 9l!iOf-S21)l H' WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE - BUNDLE 220 PACIFIC HIGHWAY LANE COUNTY . Design Team Leader - Jerry Lane Designed By - Jim Kent Ora r t ed By - Me j.llew Bunde SHEET NO. DRAINAGE I UTILITIES 6A-4 File No. , rv? ~ ~t' & ~ ~~~~ -f. , -:u ~--o .'~ / ~~e 7~C,'.:;Vt~",',:-,_,',,-"f,.-.'."-::. "".".,~ ~ r '" -,: '" ':t!f :, '. ". ..' . ,$C~}:~~~,;:::.~:;;~:"."~"", "M ~1;, 'r"::":'::"-:':'(iS~~{''-'')')'rb'', "FN 1" LINE _..r !-,;- '::. ~,,--"-- .\"-' ~)f ~,~ ' ....,_,__.'-~- ,c." --1}) '~':::;:":-'::::v, .;~~{;, ~ .,' !;{, ~{, ~ . """...,. ~".- . ' 'rCOIOI' u" -.J)l -\- .. _-... __'''..''~ .....,,;;;;"-2':::::::::::',.,....:"" "__ _. "f 0 \ 'g ~~:. ~.,)..,%~ ..,--- ~;~.~--: --, ,'., ---"LN 1" LINE 2; .. ~ .' ... ',i. __,,, _r' =------ ~,=_,_ ~ ~~.. >>~~~~ . ~,J I 0 --.,--..--~_~.~~.~:...:~,,:,- ..- ~ , ~~ ----,.'~ ____________=: ........::;;::<-- / ... n ~ =S-""""" -='_'~,,;;;~ ..'"-----~~--....J...;.-=5,.--._".-,- ~ _..'" . ~-,..::",r~~;;~~=~) N.Do ~~ - _ _. ~--:;,-==-:. C":::; -:'1:::"; ',rc'OJ . :r-""""B. .~.~.._::~ ~ ~~..,..~ , ~ "'{ (\-s)S ""'~"-""'---"3T-"" >if''E :- ~ ---\' CIF\C \1~ 0 ..._"",,~-v.., '".< - - .i.';."", ' :::'ji':, -_--=-_ ...,..,:",,~,;-- I ~",,' ~..l' ;;". /' .__ _;,:; -::L~~.~='-=rr~':::~4..:-"::_:r' ;;{;\~~:' ". - -",:~f ,..i'. ...,..,.,-r..y.....,'....',';.J"......,.,\l) c;r./.'....'-' ",-c' ~"',...~.) .,'.'l',- ....,. "', . ~'/.- ,"' . ,.' ...'.,',.""..... ,;t;P .:g::... --- , , '--.,' .. -'" ~ r'!'\'L' ;..,)'O;.\\\~'~~f-:..",\'.. 'or' ,,' ;,')!',s,,)O (>i"'~r. \",,"~gc ~f- /~ ~f~.:";'~','ii;'!~;~c,-: 1~;~:''':.::~',''>,~~~SI: L] NEt ,,~cFe;:j, _"" (;,.:::/ < c.P" /";. ......,. :.< t;:',-SI:'. ":";;~g .(;;~[~'~~(L~j3~,=~,~ft ~~~~~'~f~~?;;~-;t\f;~.o ..,~, o ..y / ":~r;~r:~r ':-- ~ _>: "__ '<,......\,.. " E, -- "___ A ,.:, 0 --~': .:"'"-;.....". --P --- \.,.--.., "':~.r ~ ' ., '~.i .,> i~;:~':( (.-t;~~~ .'~. ~ " ",' .",,1 ~, / Sec. 4, T. 18 S., R. 3 W., W.M. ." 0) Const.bioswale =.RAI'.. <':.7",. -, :> ", ,_,J.... ..,' .' ". .... ". ,. ..-....~; -~ -..,-..,. "-~~ i:~t ....lio: '" ,," .-.1,;" >.:; .~.,. RfII I: --------- -~----- ,; ~"-- "'. " f//w RfII 1t= OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~ Q;rpQraleOftice: flJJcatmrrQJJ8R04/l. SlJIlElrnJEI1GENE. ()i8XX';9NVI-8X39 I,' CONSUiJlN(J SiXl>SW~flOoIa$/JIrr;Ii'f)LAi<E0SlIr0Q~9l1).1$..<?f!8 .-,.- EllGJNEERS = USS/a'{ STTEE1 SE SUTf ICQ SMEI. f.R'(;(yf 9r.X12-1295 ~ _OOrl;.ro1I /3J'jPCPf..,4R0fMutD'1:R:laEGOr;9J5(M-&!Jl 1-5' WILLA METTE RIVER BRIDGE . BUNDLE 220 PACIFIC HIGHWAY LANE COUNTY Design Team leader ; Jerry Lone Designed By - Jim Kent D"'-ofted By - Bloke Phillips SHEET ". DRAINAGE a UTILITIES 7A-3 :'\Projects\019\OI9095 \Roodwoy\Del iverobl es\Droft Dap\Base AI ign 6' Srructure\ 1"i259f _OfJ_7 A- 3.drl 9/22/2008 02,09 PI'" File No. \ pJ'I1 Sec. 3, 4, T. 18 S., R. 3 w., W.M. (;\\ o <" . ~ <: - ~ ~ Z ........... 7 --J f\) o + o o ~ -.....<:.:: ..>.. "'\. '<:::~:::~::.~;~~~~_~;,~c.:::~,:_~____.. ,- ....~ -'::.-'~~ -::...-~ --.j .. N ../\\_._-...-..,\ Ul ',\ -~~- + '- '-- \ 0 .......::~:~--=-~~ --~ - ","'~' )- . ~" '-,=:-:--~-::.:- -:"_-i~~~;;~:~,':!Y ::=:=:::_ _-=-:~~__~ _ ,-,-,i~2~~~ ~=,~--t--.:.. ,'- 0 ""'~"'1>'~":'-',~....~_:.:.-_;~~:;~.:~...,--.:"._"....~~.:-,-,.",.., _'~..=,.~,'-.,:~.-~,. _,__~~~---- -_',-, -J/' . ~.---- - - -- '- - .-::::~.::::-.::::~"-,,,,,"'"-''''''' " "', --- '. ,.-.:::..::, < '" :;;\" \. '. ' -"f';''=;'.~.i.~.;,~~;,~~:=~~\\' ~ ""'__...~~'~ '. , -'" --'.'---'J-__ U ',";' c-c:.~~:::__.__ __.j., ----- -i::!. ..\' ",. .... ':'1 R~ f\)' ....~_>,~,.i.".\:~~'~~:., :~'l r o .... '...::.., '- " '.;.'~ \".1' (/) ,,~~\ ____ -I- ", '. " -; ,~, t1 ,... O~ ~\',;' .~,-;~ -" . c"'; . ~i _.___' o ----s \ -t "' , J t.:>'j ~~'"~~ _if~ J:::,. '') t; ,'r _,,__ __', ~ . ..\~~. \, :.,....,,\,"(. J"- ~ -'- ---~-/: -"-"" ' -----------" ----- \\';"':' \\ + ",_ -.\:" ' 0 "__ __ __':_\;:~-'" _______ _____, 0 ';~"flJ" \,----.--.-...... --". <t C _ RM "LNI" PACIFIC HWY. (\-5) N B. \~~:.:- , i 'PACiFIC HWY: (\-5) S.B. -'L-__ \ \ ....- ~ .~. ., .; "'-~'-- ---.-------- , '-- '- --------- "Y ---;---'" ,<' J: \Project's\019\OI9095\Roodwoy\Oel iverobl es\Oraft Dop\Bose AI ign 6' S-ITuctur-e\1L1259'LB6_8^-:~.d..----l 9/2212008 ----.-" 02,09 PM "LSI" r -z. ~ ~ -l u' o -\-- o o LINE LI NEJ ~ <.f\ ~ ~ .l> u' o -\-- o o / 1r OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~ CorInratoOf1ico; OC'tl CCli..Mm'alB /i'OoW SWEII.IOO f1JGENE, Cl'EGa< 914(J14.W I: CONSUlllNG SC\'lSSW~oo.w.SUIlFI20l.AYEa5'lIf'O:<0IIEG0N91035--4.?JJ8 --.,.- ENGINEERS ?235 A#SSD'i SrFffT ~ StIlE laJ ~ 0fEGCW 9m2-129S ~ _<t:n:CDlI 131> PCRAR~ J.IBJ'tRI CR3X1'i 9r.;()4-&W 1,5' WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE, BUNDLE 220 PACIFIC HIGHWAY LANE COUNTY Design T OClm Leader - Jerry Lane Des;gned By - Jim Kent Drafted By - Blake Phillips DRAINAGE a UTILITIES File No. SHEET NO. 8A-3 ;- " . ./ 1 -, .. LANDSCAPING PLANS . " GENERAL NOTES: A. Suryey information from survey developed in 2008. by: OBEe Consulting Engineers 920 Country Club Rd.. Suite 100B Eugene. OR 97401 T, 541-683-6090 F, 541-683-6576 Contact: M. Armstrong Survey dated: August 2008 B. Soil lyres on lte site ore classified In tte Lnne Coonly 5011 Survey as Caroos gravelly sandy loom. Ch:JproorrUrban land complex. CrotKJlIs silty claf loom. DlxorNllle.PhllomattrHazelolr complex. FltNents. NevloorfJ-Urbon land complex. Pengra slit loom. Pengra-Urban land complex. and Urban land-Hazelalr-DlxorNffle complex. C. Zone of Removal: Remove ollexisfing site surfaces and elements including but not limited to: trees, street trees. and existing landscapes. D. Within the Zone of Removal. noxious weeds are present. For details on '/()C(]fion and control options. refer to Noxious Weed Control PIon. E. East of Willamette River Bridge. trees 5" DBH (diameter at breast (leightJ and' larger have been shown. Remove all trees less than 5" OBH east of Willamette River Bridge unless indicated as "Existing tree to remain." See Legend. F. West of Willamette River Bridge. trees B" DBH (diameter at breast height) and larger have been shown. Remove 011 trees less than ,8" DBH west of Willamette River Bridge unless indicated as "Existing tree' to remain." See Legend. G. Protect trunks. limbs. roots. and root zones of existing- trees to remain. H. Impacts to Wetlands are yet to be determined. Any compensatory mitigation or site restoration efforts will be developed in conjunction with Mason Bruce & Girard. the Site Environmental Lead consultant. THIS IS THE FILE Nf\ME LOC^TJON Z:\obdp - Willameile Rive. B.idge\CAD\Existing Conditions .... LEGEND SYMBOL o o ~?!~~ ~~<,',\, ~~~ ~~~ f'--..... !" /-,--l ~ ~~ }7~"'- N~~- , , .' '" -AE- j ZZ-SEP-Z008 TYPE Limit of disturbance Existing Deciduous Tree To Remain Existing Coniferous Tree To Remain Existing Deciduous Tree To Be Removed Existing Coniferous Tree To Be Removed Brushline Treeline Zone of Removal See Note C Wetlands R/W Line Concrete Barrier Utility Tower Overhead Utility Lines 04,00 P.M. NOTES: CD Potential trees to be removed. Outside R/W. See notes. '- 1r OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I~ ~1ttH~~.t ~(snJ~~ ~A"D5C~'E ~JCIIIHCTli LL' T.II<''''.1>.. Ol,S 1000Eoo'J,....., F,,'" '11_1'.. (X, _OJ"<OI ."""..,.......... 1-5' WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE - BUNDLE 220 PACIFIC HIGHWAY LANE COUNTY Desi<:;n T'3am Lead<:;r - Larry K. C;Jber-~ Designed By - J~5Tjn K. Lanphear Drafted By Lauren Worland, Justin K. Lanphear SHEET "'. EXISTING LANDSCA~E CONDITIONS PLAN GENERAL NOTES AND LEGEND GN-l {--ile No. . :z = ~ ~ -I o ~ R/W \ z- A E ~ A E ~ E \ ~; - '-/1 E 1 E~ ~.~ A E _ _ \ - - ~ - - - ~--- . "" r"\ - A I:. - _ A E _ . , --1-;;.,._'=-':::._______ { E '- . r >;: ,.' -E:.J -, ~ -. - ----=---- -' - - -:-. -___._. , E ~ PACIFIC HWY. (J-5) N.S. _-L. _. - --- .-.-. .".."~ ..- -. - , ---. ._~- - --'-- ------ ~----. _"'______:::0-- - __=__=-----_.__., -. -'. "- -'--. ----- --- ...-. KEY PLAN THIS is THE FILE NAME LOCATION Z:\obdp , .t" I /1 Will ometi-e Rive. Bridge\CAD\Existing Conditions A E ",-.. '-'- "-. --,. ----:<0 ~"... ,._" --...-- "--.- . 22,SEP-2008 0' 25' 50' ~ 04:00 P.M. A E ~AE L 100' 200' I -/1 E- A D .'A t 1r ~~ ~fTl -1(/1 Ocr :efTl fTl --< OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . Me CAMERON. McCA'iiTHY I GILBERT a:SCHEIBE G L....DlCAPI!....CHITI!CnLL. 8Z: T.I..'....n.. S 1O.......'..,.j.... f,,'"''H''' _0."'" offi........'.- 1~5: WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE ~ BUNDLE 220 PACiFIC HIGHWAY LANE COUNTY Desi~n Teain Leod'jr' - Lor,.-y K. GiltJe,.-t D'3sigr1ed By - Justin K. Lanphea,.- o fted By - Lou,"ln Worland. Justin K. Lanphear .0 SHEET NO. EXISTING LANDSCAPE CONDITIONS PLAN "LS1" 345+96 TO "LS1" 360+00 File No. GN-9 "' OHWM , ~,'.. '" . I ,....." .:z ~ " /' ./ KEY PLAN OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I I I~ g1r::~~ & ~t){,Nn l^~DI"".~ AJ,CHITHCTI LLP T..'''''l-11'5 C~S t..E........_. F..l"'U.llll Ci(. E.._ O~ ,.,.., .m".......,-.- 0' 25' 50' ~ 100' 1,5, WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE ' BUNDLE 220 . PACIFIC HICH~'{A Y Lf.NE CDUNi':' - "."-'--"_ IZ"'""' ., ...., 200' I Design Team L>:loder - Ler.y K. GilberT Designed By - Justin !<. Lanphear- 0- f~ed By - lOL;ren l'la.lend. Justin K. Lanpheor . a , SHEET "'. ,,, EXISTING LANDSCAPE CONDITIONS PLAN "LS1" 360+00 TO "LS1" 3T5+00 GN-l0 22-SEP-2008 04,00 P.M. -z ~ ~ ~ ~ h " "' =1 "' :!! ~ "' '" , R/W o_________q..::_ 0 . - , \ - I " . / , ------- ,- o o . ... . '] , " ----- --- o 0' 1- -. - - , o , 0 " ' o KEY PLAN "'.\ ---"--- -"- 0' 25' 50' 100' 200' ~ 22-SEP-2008 O~,OO P.M, ) ~ 1tr' OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I~ g1tt::~~;. ~c1IAN~'f lM.DSCAPE AlClllTEClS LLP & h'.....J.1l" S '..:._8.....!... .,,''''ll-llU E._O.'I'" .m........'..... 1-5' WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE, BUNDLE 220 P~CIFIC ~IGHWAY' LANE COUNTY Design leam leader - Lorry K. Gilbert Designed By - Justin K.' Lanphear Orafted By - Lour'3n War-land, Justin K. Lonph9or Si1EET ". EXISTING LANDSCAPE CONDITlOtlS PLAN "LS1" 375+00 TO "LS1" 390+00 GN-l1 rile_No. 0" - 0 ~S! ~ o , iin o _ 00 "\ .......,--.=.1:.-;.;..\ .fl -' 0' 25' 50' ~ 200' I 100' 22-SEP-2003 O~,OO P.M. 1t= . OREG~N DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IMe ~~~:r~~ 4~ccHAG7n 8P A"DICA."AICIUT,,<;HLLP S '''.-'''1-.1 T.I'....'.1]1> _01';:::: ...,.,""']1' 1-5' WILLAMETTE RIVER BRI~';~-:--;UNDLE 220 PACIFIC 'HIGHWAY LANE CPUNTY OesiQn Team leader - D . Larry L... Gilber- es,,;;:ned By - Ju"'~' - ' Drafted B ~,In K. Lanphear y - Lauren Worland. Justin K. Lanphear EXISTING LANDSC . "LS1" 3 APE CONDITIOllS PLAN S~~ET 90+00 TO "LS1" 405+00 GN-12 File No. ~ ~ , ~'4~ 4~ I I " ., ." '\~~ ~:i't~.i\\~'~!~~~~~ ,Jj~:!(~\\'*~fii~~'~\;~~~~I;~~';:~~~\:;:;~~i~I~' : c"c'~;;:' <..' .' >. ~~\~ ~'\\\\\~I' ~"" ~- ~~ ii~~~~~~~\~t~~t;:W",.:<:tt,'~~,~~t~f~~~~~~i1~~~~~'\\~'~~~,~:\~\~;~\.~\\~;\~,\~\ \~\~\~~W\, ~~~~~; ~\;*~\;~~\\~I\'\~~:\~\;I~~\::~: ~:'\~~~'~\"I\~\I\~ ':I~;~W:~\\~\V:~ ~~:%;\~~~." " > <' " \ : ~ ~ "II.\\'-"\\'"\'~ + // ""'\"'''=~'\\ '\11' "\'I"'~C'-~,-,-,...,I\""I"w.'TI\ '\~"'\""I\\I\\\"'''\ \"1 ~"''''I '1'''1' \\'I"\'1C'"'''' '~\" ',' ~ '~/~< ,.', / . ~,L....j\\\\\'-\\\\~'\\\\i \ ~~~ '~'i1k~ / ' ," ',.. '~,'~'(~~~.~,_\\:\.~,~\\~0~\~,~\1~J{~\'.,: \ \\\~\\,\\\~~\ \:,:.~~_~L\\\ $:-:~~~~~\X\'\\~\I\\~~~\I.\\\\~, ~I\\\\:\<~ ~\\\~d\\ \~&~~\G}~iiP-~~<g, ,....' ~ / ,/ / / ' . ~ - ,,\., ~o -""'" ... , '~T.~\\Tm-~\\\"$\\\\': \\\\\\..~\\.,,,~\,\\\H"\\\\I\ >-h~'.... .,.,\\.\\ ',' \J,1,-\'\W\\\\,.~l-\_~ , ... .. ~..." ... .~.., =-- ~, ~ ~ --, q-:-- ~...... .' ~ - --:'~"'...U~L11f.L ~'_l\ \\'\'1\\\\\\\ '\\ \ \\.\\\\f\' \\\\1~'\\\\\0\\ \ \..\\\,,\'..,\\0.+-~;-'-'W\'i-\'-I\\M' \\\\~':r::;j;..,l>'lfu...-.... ~ " ~ /", ti.., ... / ' ;,..., .w~" ~..;>.,:;~ ..' "$ =- ~ _ " .,' -:t>.~ . 1\ . ,.,.--::~- \~.'., ...,.1;\l,4?;~'(i). ,\'w.....-."\\,.\.__\~'-'I:...Ul>- rT~u"-V '\'\-lli'__'llS:~~.".~" --,,,' /' ' ...\, , ' / "o(fi'5"'-:: ~_;'~'~;::_:.;}(:';(; - ".. . . .' '. . =...... . . '\ ..' .' !;j# "LNl"Llti5 ~. / _"IE.'. .' . .' .' ..' . H"'V'" \\-5~., '. -:"\..' , :' -"", ''"''~''/- -.-- " "', c...,../....~..;,:/:;;~, >...; ~',' ~~:_~~' ' . - =. '-. ',.. -."-'_-L ___, .. "" .'~_~, .' .' . " . , ."./....y. /,\ ... % . :. i 'PAClFI.r.. .. \.. . ".. ," > ~' . - - p",~; '.:..._"~'- -- . ~"'-,"--__.{ '1.\... .'. .... ,,"'.' ..w.", ,. . ".," " '.0,"J' ~.';';_~': ~'o"~-- -- ." . "J" :-.7. ""~, " _(,_" .. . . .;i; /.._'~:: ,.- ,.' ,,'....-< '.' .' uA:~i~l'C '~w'y;';: "l~ '/:/,'. ..", ~L.'~~/tr~;\;\.:\\~~~~~-' '-"~-\ ",~ -.-~~ .'.:~:.-. :" . . ,.' '. . '. ~', ". .... " " .... " " . II I I t ,'" I"', . I' '.' ...' .1' .'.~. / ., \'~\\\\\~\\\\\~.,~\~\~~>~~l " .... fifl- - ,""'" /,). -~'- '.', ~, " \ *" TSl"LlNE"-/' .... . ' , . ~~~-=-;-:-f\m1:m\\",-;,\\'\,,;,,\\.,\,\.:,\(j;;~\\;"""'" , , ,,'.' .~ \\ \ - ,- ", \--.-.-.~~~~~;::...,. _..of< T~.--r'~ I ~ '.' ~\ , .--n-": ' \ .:!./:"" .\\ ' , T...:::'''~d~ 4 ':'.....' ,,-..------.....~-"--=~ :': w ... \ '\IT, \\"\' \":V-,' \' \'.\\\\\;": ,.:W ~r"\\\ \\\"\'~' ~'\' ""' ,~~. '. ~..."..., \ '.. ""....' '. ~-ll\...\.>...~::-~...:..\,,\'ili\'t~_\ '~p.\\\\ t~~~ \\\'\'\"1\ \\\,\\ \,\ '~\-V\:B'-\'~--\s-\ ...!..-YrAJ-,('~~"~\--\--\"\~J.-..""~' r._',C ,I "J'~~~__~\\\\\~ ,\ \ '\(:;'i)"\\' '\\'''.\\\~~J.-'':''~_.~ ~...., 0' "', ____-- ,~r \l-~"~-~~3\U'~ \~\',\\\",,;j,\'S\\'~~.ci-~--, - ,.'"" ~;;~~';-~7\~YJ', ~-\ ",- r;-;~';~\\\\'\\\I\:"~"\\\~\\'t0\\\'~\\\\\\\'\"\\\\\'_\~'~~-:~~. 0." ,..,' _- ":-..... _ - .:.: --=""- U~-~"c:.."'::.' \' j'. _ - ~\. :-\.:.A-:~':-'~-' ::>J.-)i- \. WC\..~.\{t~ ~\\\ ' ,\\, " , \\\\\\ '\~'C}'- --- ,---.; . '~- ',_ ...." ..., _____ L --- . ----~- . ,I'. ",. n1-";;:_--.-_""Y-~" '""'"-.... '--'-, . 0" '..,' - _ ---,,-- -_:..._____~--_, ". .~\':~v.-ef"I><' ,- - -_.I...\.,....:~ ~T~ " ".'. ,,>~ ....' ~' ,'"..' - ___- --J-- - - ~i ~::--5-:~-f-~-'~~~""'-:C~----- ~~~y -0; \~Jo"?o' -...' ,A E.__~~~~... . -";:~'~~--====-=--A E "i>v,' -; <~<,:.., -.-.. .,..~----~~;~~~-~,. ....;.d~~:~-,--:~ OffllM-tL "":~.~~~' ~-,'~ ~-=--"'~~~y~?~:>/,~...:---::"'-A'~-- -AE . / ',/. -1-,;;:\--'0;' \.-\ -~ ~~" .'. ..... .. . ...,.--c......:-....J"'..?'~ . ,', .,,"~c .D'lC~-" .;!;:\2 ,,.c - '0"'J\~~ ' ,'--, A"- 70' !! ~./?~~......,~. - '.. _::,' :"'-\,k," CP?c'M,i?'->'-::-' - ' _'_ ,'. '=-':;y~~ q:.'( A\?;i..~ ' ~ '''-I. ''r'::~",~ - ~ 1,<'5(;' 8' '-..~.." IV -~ ~ .'V .!s.k.,,:-,;;:;-..,---;o,". . 1--~'iD'-\ - I~. ::-v . '----__ . ~ --' . : {i:j" ~ .:J I ~I " / .,; ,,-,;,,:.1. ":".-- '.,.~....--- ." "";:':', :~"\}:;-~ ~-.. . .';;;''-;.,. .' S~:.)~~: R/W '--".:;- -- /" " ~ / .// ~_/ " / KEY PLAN .... r 1r OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I~ ~N:f:r~~.t, ~c~A:r~r LAND'CAPe ..RCHITEcn LLr ()~ T.I..'UH'" CJt..S ::: ~;~::: :"f~:~~ ~\ ~~- :{ - tin 100' 1-5' WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE . BUNDLE 220 PACIFIC HIGHWAY LANE COUNTY '--, ,...... ~ 7;;~..t11;' I..;r~~~: " ]"11:'). ( : ~t(/"'''' - ........< '< / / .ill - Design Team L'30der - Lar-.y K. Gilt-art Designed By - Justin K. Lonphear "DnJfled By - Loursn V,'orlond, 'Justi" :<. Lanphear ". . ",,~ 0' 25' 50' 200' I EXISTING LANDSCAPE CONDITIONS PLAN "LS1" 405+00 TO "LS1" 418+00 SHEET NO. GN-13 THIS IS THE FILE NAME LOCAIIOt'-J Z:\obdp - Willametie River Bridge\C/l.D\Existing Conditions 22-SEP'2003 04,00 P.M. File No. iJr~'010 \ \\'\~., dP/~ \ \ . [i'!Z!I%, ~ " NI Ifl'lJ" ff'I';r'~'1 " Iii 11!/I-;ijjII~!11 , '. - - - \ ill 111lf-:.i'd!t/l~'J :-..~ \ -. ,ill illl!~~!'Yh"'-' I, .,,,'c:'., ,'. /Jj,f/llf:!iJ/II~ ,0.:",. '~",~,,,,,:"",,,, r- 'Ui! I ""/ ,/t,.", ...' -"" - , '7' -; ~';;;;!!~J~J;'~~v:! ,!~'i~~O~~t~~ - ?G"s'-~z, --, ~,,- ,4"~ 0) l "'~'$,~;,<,,~~~i:~~l~~/:1~~~tit~~. _ " ....co ~ ~~'., ..' ..' .. ..' .......~-=.':.:=>.- .~:~.~.:'-;':',)'::;~:.~::;:<;:;;:j-':~;9~:=0- ~ ~~~~~~.;,_ -.'- ... .~'.' _ . . 0 .. ._ "LNJ" LiNE-- . - \-- ~ . ..::<;-i10 ~:';..':S,k0"'"~_" / ~_ - - < ...' -_ .=c\," , " ? . H . ~'::~~~~~~1~~~~~~;,.c:,. -,...-' '.' ,,,?~;,"~+'L __ .,.>~: ;.7~, ~'?'_' ':'-~~;~~~ ::< ,~.;::,~~~~~~;':;~}~~~ ~..~, ....'.:::.i,~O, - - ' --..,-.-'-- ~. '.. -..._- -'--" ---. b ~ ~=,': ~ _"-:"~" ~~':~~~iflit;;i/j~~;~~fjiii~[~t~'f ....:.,'~il~ -----A EE_ ---.-,:~~!/,., I.~.' 'C'.C?," - ' - . " A Co.", \". '" A E~~-"-~---_____\ 0 . -y' ---\A E "'\ A', ~AE '\-~AE --------------.. ....--- ~ ~ / ~ / o ~ / ~ ~ / ~ KEY PLAN " II ~\ Y5, :1\ .. =---.,,_.~.. II , " I. ~~ ~: "..-"1:-7~~':~-~~-'~;~~ :r:-7,..;.~.c.; -~:_\ , 1}f7 '~~;/~.'.4~.".',~, " "/1\'j. .~. ~~. """""", !". ")', " - ,......,..', hi' .'.,__ , ~ I THIS IS THE FILE NAME LOCATION Z:\obdp - Willomette River 8ridge\CL'lD\Existing Conditions 22-SEP-2008 0' 25' 50' , 04:00 P.M. 200' I 100' J - ----- -~-_......- -' ~ ~ (") :J: r- ':i I"" ~ -- _.~.,.. ....~..-_. I 7r -l u-' o -\-- o o OREGON DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION IMe g1~::~~ i~cc~t':T~~ G LAl'DICAPE A~C1Hucn LLP &' T,,!<"".UIl S ...---. P,,14'UHJn _0""'" ..,.........~ 1.5: WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE. BUNDLE 220 PACIFIC HIGHWAY LANE COUNTY O~:;;;(]n Teo011 LBoder - lorry K. Gilbert D'Olsignsd By - Jt.:s-:-in i(. lanpnear Drafted By - Louren Worland. Justin je Lonphear SHEET NO. EXISTING L'ANDSCAPE CONDITIONS PLAN "LS1" 418'00 TO "LS1" 430'00 GN-14 Fil,:: No. SEE SHEET GN-12 MA TCH LlNF - -- - -. - .--....,---..-----..--.,..... ~-- -~ --- R/W ~=~ 1tL'I P:"A~ ~\ 1A "~ c \ . II .:','. ,k~ --"':--= ;;::-"~~I~~~ .~ .fl - I),.,..., ~ -.'" . . - 11;771 . I 'Y _.' .!', "J ~-':"'-"'" "'~'~ . )' -,....., ". ' ~, '. - " 0' 25' 50' ~ 100' I 200' THIS IS THE FILE NAME LOCATION Z:\obdp - Willomette Rive, Bridge\CAD\Existing Conditions 22-SEP-2008 O~,OO P.M. /" ~ .' 7J/r' OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IMe &1~::~~ i ~c1tlT~~ GLA..-DICAP"".CHITECTlLLP & T.tl.'....'n' S'OII__-' F..1414l1-1l" f.q_O."'" ."........"__ 1-5' WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE . BUNDLE 220 PACIFICHIGHWA Y LANE COUNTY Design 1eom Leodar - Lorr-y K.Gilbert Designed By - Justin K. Lanphear Drafted By - Lou,en Worland. Justin ;0.:, Lanpheor EXISTING LANDSCAPE CONDITIONS PLAN RIVERVIEW STREET' SHEET NO. GN-15 Fife No. "0 WILLAMETTERIVER BRIDGE PLANS -" ;,,- ~ 84'-0\ \ \ . 806'-0" ctr.-ctr.end bents 1 ( 1\ ; \\'01 ((" ~~\ \ '- -~. ~\\ j o _ _ -x~---------A- _ Span 1 \ '.. \ ? Concrete deck arch ) I! ~ ,I <<\ \) r \ \ 1 ;;; ~~........ \-\ I I" ,\,t, V o y-==-=---~- ~ -----" ~,W~=~ 390'-0" Span Z 416'-0" Soon 3 \ ,r \ ,\ / '- \ \\ \ '- ,I panef,tYP_.see~wg'~i\J~ 3E ~ )" ----------------------_____~------Ee.!.ma'2entEa5ement 3LK! O::l I \ II 600.0Q'Sp. \ ~ ~\-- ~ --------=!3f:165 forcj,e;~ Lri >0) \ - A E a)-A E - -A-E--------Ac----- O)c A-E<\!~ - - E L( I III 53045'00" - :3 ~ r - -------==:"=7 ii:::'~ \~\:;: - -~.- A~';' - \ \ \- A [ A [ '? Mill race ruins ~ 0 '" Mill race \g l \ '\" 0 0.208 \ \ m "," / \ ~- \~- \ I '" . ~ ~- '" '" 1\ ' 'I- , t ,- It :: 1/ \ ~:G___ 0 ~:i3 ';? Existing structure No :5 ~ t? ? ~ ~I,~ 0 ~ c:' \\. ( I 0 \, a to :: 1/ \' Q]~ ' ~ Exp jt. \ 2 0 19620 to be removed ~ C1:JrEXp jt 0 ~ <: ~ <b ,."Z I \\ 0 \ ; 1------- L ~_ ~~-~\\, \ ~ S05804W ~ - "LNI"L 'l'--'o,), ,/.20" \' \ "',e /~J~~1i~~--~j~l~v~,:~::~~~il~~~~1-~~~L\\ -~ ~ - - --- ~ l-~ !- "jl~~---- V --0 -~t ~~~ ly) fie ~~jT>>\~- s1 ;~205~04:~_T__: ___+~~~'~~~JP~-r~~sl~~rce-T~: -- -~~T~---i i'~ ~ 'i =r;-r- i 0~i~_ r/~f '_:rf,?7-~\~ =~_,~~ a , ~, .~~A -B1/~ $'I/~-"\''-''{~-\~,,~ \./~././././././L~LLdL~~~~./././././././LLLLLLL~LL~~~U./././c/././fJ" % :>" ,1,#,:~ ~!yJ' 'l/}L'/ :r,LL LU_L~LL:(J~ ~ ---""=-91",- -"'~J/EXP.Jt\'2,\\ \.- . ExpjtkJ . '" Ii:' Exp.jt. \rl\" ~ "' ,,}; -- - _________ , "'I .~ ~I~ ~ ~g ~,. / 2,' \ Existing structure No. ~ I I' . t ~ "t- ? 1-0. \ \ I '\\ ~~\ ~. ~/'S:'il _ - -~;:.... -- 1- II _________i- I I tv:) \ 08329 to be removed f. l.tJ~ ) ~ '-D I ~ "L51'" i""/,' . ~,,// _________ -I-- _______ ~ ~----::- __Z: . I I \ C\j ~ ::;,. ) Lr) J'.... ,\ ~/ , _______________435--'-------- ._0.. ----........... /Y) ,I /Y) j I ':J I 1 . co .q: - I lr) co 600.00 Sp \\ ........:;; \Gt;' 1/ -r--.. -_,~ - / -;1 ~ /Y) -.J Ct: t- Z f<l 5 3045'00" \ ~ \ g I~~i~~~/ 'Iti\I," , ~~. i ' . ~ ~-\.~~ )00,2.081 'It I:, -, ~o \.'~II ~/ ~ _ 1- I ~O:l __~&)__ ----IQ.. J \ ;:-J~ ~;:-l\l) - I=- ___ --;:-:= -\ I E A E -;:::: ------...,,- - - - --..: __~ r I'~- ------------------'- '!:'___J:e[({}oTleTl~E(]SfJr'2e!'L__~_____V;~_________ --~rD", _0 _'0 '" --- ,', . ~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~:c~~~) /! ;\\,' ~\o;-o,,\sponz 806'-0"ctr.-ctr.endbents 416'-0"spon3i" . I (I; y\~\\,~q:.':~r-~~ ~10'c~b2~~~~~" I~~ ~~ -s < Span I~-__--_' " \\\ \ Concrete deck arch' \ \/ \8 II --'1 7A//Alj!./JI; . _0 .G "---,-_'~ ~~~~ ~ ',,-1-1 '0< . I I \ '."'. II //'/';./7 /Yu~ 'pLAN 5cole: 1 ":::50' r ~ o L o / C o " o r . " / U o U / ~ 8m ^ U DATE o / ~ o / . r o . .0- ct ACCOMPANIED BY DWGS. _~~1]?,. .B.R.2_Q~,_ ~~?9~!_ / Z c o u W ~ ~ U 4 o ~ m o m o -560 -540 -520 " -500 ~ '- -480 .~ " -460 ~ -440 a ~ m i;j -420 - -400 -380 -360 u w rn o o / C o o ~ c '6 " / ~ 4 o I Note, Elevations are based on Verticol Datum. 1988. REVISION [ Bent I I I [ Benl 3 . Symm. about [ Arch I f Bent 4 Approach spans [ Bent 2 I 1 I Standard 3-tube I curb mount roil. typ., 57'-0" \ Cut HL9 see Owg BR2:8c;~_; .. .~ ~ /=t'f)i~.tiX~.. 16'-0"-" Slope paving. Ii..:'""." '. ~ I O z -,,;;~;\L .c, . see wg. BRI15 J ~.V ~ '0~~1 ~ u I ~ Driven piles Typical minimum '45" dio. water line at fo((NBJ clearance envelopes I and. near arch rib faces for path @ for (NB) [ path and nedr arch rib f Gee *Co!umn to beam . ".*in deck Symm. about [ Arch I I I 921'-0" rail pay length. typo eo. side I Std. 3-tube curb I mount rail transition,' see Owg. BR2079 .I I ' ' . , ~ it ~ 0- "- '" "! a '" ;-;i I I .-Exp. 59'-0" "1 **ExQ. l . , lOcal{)OCI O:lt<")toa l..Oc5""c) ~ C)~ a -'l()-'lC") :'5 - ~ Lj r Profile gradeline @ '~~. . "LNI" & "LSI" !.ine 2.50% - -Z.50% p.rapo:d structure ~ ?nns' V( '.:_0'" *Fix .Fix \ 10 r -6N 107' 0" 156'-6" 147'-0" 426.21 ~ Extg. ground ~ 40' rt.77~ Extg; ground @ "L51" Line~ / Extg. ground @ 28' It. ,I II -~ShOft of exig. det~ur bridge (east rib of NB only) . I Note: I Southbound structure shown, . Northbound structure similar. i-I LJ n II II Drjlled SharJ Bents 2-4 . - GRADELlNE DIAGRAM the North American I I Note, ' I See approach span details for typical sections. Spon 1. Existing bridge Nos. 08329. 19620 STRUCTURE NO. I Jiri Strasky, Ph.D., HE Consulting Engineer SHEET ELEILA TION_ No Scale Scale: 1"'=-50' [BY I 1- DESIGN G'" G~ \=nF' . - ' ,'\ \)SS~\>-c;*_1' )11& OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION \ ",I' "'oS 1,,1> . . \) '\ \>-" '=> ------ S<::( ?ll'r ' ~ CorpomtDOffiCll:920COUNlRYaUBROAD,su/TEIOOBEUGENE,0REG0N9NfJI-B089 rC,c~, () I: CONSULTING 2235 MJSSION SlJlffTSE. S/JITEIOOSAlEM OREGON9TJ02-/295 ~- ENGINEERS 1335 POPWI 0RflIE, MEfFOR{) OREGCW 97504-5201 ~ ....wobec.com 5aJ5SWM6WOWSfKlo1QSUlTEI2fJ,UXE~GOOREGON91504.42$lJ 1 . YII~MS WIUAMETTE R. & HWY 15 & UPRR, HWYS 1 & IW 1-5: WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE - BUNDLE 220 PACIFIC HiGHWAY LANE COUNTY PLAN AND ELEV A nON CONCRETE DFCK ARCH DRAFTER: OF DESIGNER, ' . ji~' 'Bo'(i';a~: pi.' DATE 9/25/08 CALC. BOOK DRAWING NO. CHECKER, REVIEWER, fi. structure I "LN1" Line I , I r 67'-5~" 0-0 structure fi. structure I "L51'; Line i ~ ~ ;;; N o Varies I I 67'-5~" o~o structure I '64'-0" roadway 1'-83j.," r rail },-83j.," }'-83j.," rail rail }'-83j.," rail 64'-0" roadwoy ~ o o N , ~ N , ~ 12'-0" I la~e I I i 16'-0"i ! i I I I I 12'-0" I lane , I I -, i 6'-0" 1 , I I , , I I , I 14'-0" shld. 12'-0" lane 12'-0" lane 12'-0" lone 14'-0" shld. 14'-0" shld. 12'-0" lane 14'-0" shld. j ~ (\JlY1 ~ c:: c:: b ~:3- --- "'''' 0 .., '" III "",';: U ~l ~I ..c: ~~ i: o ~ ~ ,,- :os . a-'< _ u .g Q , "- ,,- ;,;: . a-'< _ u ~ " Std.3-tube curb~ mount rail. typo See Owg. BR208 ~ j~.."1 . ..' ,,' '". , I Q 16'-4":1: min. I 51.0 2.5% 51.0 2.5% t j~~~:~,1- I 7'-0" j typo . CROWN - SB [: ~~ -:+- ,- ::-1 .. .. l over river Note.. See 58 structure for details not shown. 47'-0" TYPICAL SECTION AT ARCH Scale, )18'0 }'-O" TYPICAL SI;CTION AT ARCH CROWN - NB Scale, )la"o }'-O" If structure fi. structure "LSl" Line I I I I I 67'-512" o~o structure "LN1" Line I I r 67'-5~" 0-0 structure Varies I '-83j., " roil 64'-0" 'roadway }'-83j," },-83j.," rail roil },-83j.," rail 64'-0" roadway 12'-0" I 12'-0" lane I lane i I i6'-0"j i I 51. 0 2.5% ! i t 12'-0" I lone I I I '6'-0'" ~. , ' I I , , I I 14'-0" shld. 12'-0" lane 14'-0" shld. 14'-0" shld. 12'-0" . lane 12'-0" lane 14'-0" shld. c o u vi o ~ ~ u ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o 00 ro o N o / C o Q ~ ro <> " ro t5 ~ ~ - " Q , "- ~-:. a-'< _ u ro " ~ ~ ,,- :os . a-'< _ u ~ " ~Std.J-tUbe curb ~ mount raif. typo See Owg. BR208 U I I. 16'-4"" ~. Vr...ol ./ t( I'; "I ~ t .~I> 51.02.5% ;;, .. 1:.0 I ~. . '.-.' U. - '" -, " .. I . : '1 .....J min. 5'-6" typo over river ~ci ~~ 3 1;'>>1 17'-0"1' typo COLUMN c '6 ~ / ~ ~ o ~ ~ o L o / C .0 o ~ w ~ / U o U / ~ ~ A Y' il DATE 0- / ~ 0- / W ~ o . '0- ci: ACCOMPANIED BY DWGS. - / Z Note: See S8 structure for details not shown. D. . '" '.' >.:--- ~.. 1 ,.. .. '1 eO"" ::-., 1 47'-0" TYPICAL SECTION AT SHORT SPANDREL - Scale, )la';; }'-O" SB TYPICAL SECTION AT SHORT SPANDREL COLUMN - NB Scale, )la"o },-O" I Jirl StraskY- Ph.D., P.E Consulting Engineer SHEET Existing bridge Nos. 08329. 19620 DESIGN \ ~~ ST.RUCTU.RE NO'1 WILLAMETTE R. & HWY 15 & UPRR, HWYS 1 & lW < ""s~c,~'l--I>-c" \' '''-OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION _ DATE I ~5: WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE - BUNDLE 220 " <' )JJ'I. I PACIFIC HIGHWAY ~y "r.:v IO'/, ( "<.<?"\I>- I'l-S ~ . ""-_ "'CXJuNmymelO<D"""OOBB.(;ENCOfEroV""'~ .W2?/08 LANE COUNTY \ (,c;v a~ I: CONSUl"NG 2ZJ5MlSS1ONSlREETSE ml())$qffM OREGON9r.xJ2-I?JS - r __ ENGINEERS ''''5FmAR_MElY"l>VOfEroV'''''''''''' CALC. BOOK TYPICAL SECTIONS ~ ........,ctlecoom 5aJ5SWME.AlXM'SFIOr'<aSUlTE/3J.LN<EOSVl'EGOOREGON91S04--4l88 SP ANS 2 AND 3 BY 1 YI(IHMS. -I ::::::,.. jimBOI;mon.PL REVISION OF DRAWING NO. CHECKER: 2 REVIEWER, " ~ o N N o -A E- II f illl-' /.1 '\ \ ' \~' , I / / Y4fd/"// / / - / " z- \- / 1.1 ~ I 1:\ \ I) J <y /~ / // ,I ,'. :: - 1Jj' 11'~7 ~., \ ' --I 1 ,.' ':I' '- /"FN1" -" -~~A JAr , ).' \~ -~ \V, : I? 1094' 8%" elr. elr. end bents / I ,.., ,..., /' "';.' ~"Ir/ u'\ "'--" ,/400.00' ;P'" ~ ~ =rEIC't- E- 83-8'J&"4'.f.JJ49'_0"i I, \\, " PrecasthaunchedlxJxgirder /.--- 'j,. ~~~r:4~'t'/. /?' 5'O"spanW;, 514030~0____,~::/ 'Span 4 \ "-"1 pan 5\\ _' 117'-0" Soan 6 /..--. II _ /' ,"//, "5 on 9 12 ',,' a I.BI \'5::------:= {II g;E 4~if,= \ 1\ ~ \ '\\ \ ___ 1~5'-O"Span7 X225'-O"SpanS/, ,/200-0 P-;;- _ -'-,/ .~_____-a_--fl_ c:Q . "li', -- - E-ll--4, \ \\ '....~--c';-AE- V / ,,-../,/ /' "LNl e ~-;:.. / ~_~CS-~ ~ ~' I ~'II ~ A co ~A E' -_ExiSting structure No. ~ 7.:/ //) - // 1'/;'0...0 l015'O?" ~,~;, ~~':._________ g __:: ~ :::r~~o- ~ , I .:a;~l..('6 to/ .,,(21 ~II "LN1"7A Cl)~_ \. Ii- cci"" lD---AE!)/!'.7 -- Y~r--~\l({(< ~ T74.% \-(o~'CP____~B3-- --~~::~~ {, :: ~ ~ ii ~o ~;) \ ,~~ 600.00'sp.1 \\~//77Y;;:c:?7;:'m~7/v/// _ ~ ~ ~,/ ~~';, 1 ( ,," ~~ ~f?~- ~_ e 4.5~~f\'l\"o"C"?-~~~-o/"'--'" ~~:~~ssv----t 7././..0~ltlL ,-s~ ~ "'/ _ ~~~Y~l\E~N(I~~/7/;4%~~0"1' -\~j\': Ir.c ~j~EXP,jt////~~~~r:7~~;,g,{-'{-///'A;~~~i~~\~"~~~;~7%-T:;:~~~O~~;~B~~~:~\r?~~~~~~;o~~' _ "''' C) ~ :Jlf= -/1/ -,.. ~ - / .L' \", ~ N\ 0 ~"" '---""'"7 ," , ,'1>;/' ,'" '" '0"; ,0. /~_/ ~ " ----,10_,1 'bf c:.:~ I 1"'-""""': " , ,;L L\ L '~<:;;; ~--\-- /7' /'"'";-l ~ /~;; , ;t~ 0/1 _l..O .y ,----: ~ e """Y/ ! ~------;, (;; 6 ~ ~, ';'i@, --L:;i -~/'/7)111\tL~r. tY!'\~J__-~\j~L\~L1~~,\~..c'LZ ~~~~~~/~ : ;nT7'ouJV;::'~~>~ /~/(~~: --L-:4---~.! ----- , 7/////77\ ~i::,::=:7:Jj / ~~IJi(;" ~ II--\-..L \ -1!--'\~~d1=X---'--~~~7' ,"LNJ:)ine?.{LJjj;;;d1ffi~~"z./d~~72?./f!};~ Ld 0 -r~-- _oo~-o' o ~ '" ,'", 7'(fl' I~M" ? I ,~ \- \ L ~//( J',:"-::\ y,/ /,Y/~"j'/ p ,,~'" /' ~ / // ,~ _ ~- - - ~_L~~~- ,////0-' 'c" :~'i(;-Cf':(.:_~_ 1// . 77 'i ~~7~t'-f'k:1't::r~,~;f~2';2;';F;f~~!~7~~~-- -~~~)~~~:~7{:;eend ://///////L 2."I/IJ'i/ 1. / J",t - tf-- '" '-, -\ J""iP-X(;'" 1~77~~;i-'/'''ic8'~~~1f7;t.~~~-o'B~;-;2~ -,- ~ . -----------...!RJ65 fordetai~~_ i: r~~ '/1_~,,'///~//~ ~ \\I:\)Jl2!cP/~'-lfif:/5W~>$f7/~ 0 0 -t, ~~_/-:,-/ ~~7 (9 ': l:: J -.:"~L: Y',x' - ,~o:2f~-~";Y~~-{/~,,;f.-i;/f-~/:;~~\.,/"/-~(j./././'.7~..c'//.)----:'/~- it ----------- -//~::~-:~:;,;--;-.:~~ :::: d "" I C) ~y,'J~ ' ~ ' /N P Q/,'~' ~~ _- _- -""--"'" -==- " ' '" ,,'! ~~ -""",:",} 'V -,' (t"J !' ,/ d'> ,,.>' " ~~~-:, ---::;;--"", ~r \ ~I: N ::---- < (' (j /j"- -:r; q/~ ~\// ~\ " "Existing structure No. /.-..--'" _~, ,----~ ~ ~ ____ PermE 1. ( c::',/~ ~J:27lII//cs '/. /%SV';! 9'>/ ,~, " 08329toberemaved ;..-/ ->.~u---. --,'.____' - - - _ _ _ .:...- _ O!~m<!.....nt I \". ~ // /. ;.. /~ r.'-, / / " II" .-"'- .... -::.-:::....., . ,----- PLAN / ///,:;~~ ~~ l . 1 Scale, 1",50' / --=A- m o o N , ~ N , ~ c o u r u 4 o ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ o z u ~ ? w ':; ~ ~ o ~ " u w m o a / " . c u u U L Q Q 4 / ~ 4 o -560 -540 ~ -520 " - "- -500 ~ - .~ -480 c - :g - 460 ,. - " Gj : 440 :-420-':;-~-- ~ Bent 4 ~ Bent 5 ~ Bent 6 , I 350'-0" rail {Joy lenoth. typo eo. side Standard ~-tube curb mount rail. fyp.. see Dwg. BR20B I ~ Bent 8 I Ma; n span ~ Bent 7 I ~ Bent 9 ~ Bent 10 ~ Bent J J , 775'-:4" rail pay lenoth. typo ea. side "I I ]'-6" Type "F" roil. fyp.. see Dwg. BR290 I Slope paving, ' I rlO'-Ou tal/protective fencing w/ I I,' see DW9.BR115\ 1 ; sp/oshboords over roilrood..typ. I \ 1 "lnl--'~;'''''''--'--,"T'''''-''''"'' 1r:=1 - -- _~J::ut'"""'i I -Fix _, _ ~ U:R_Rn _,,___ (iX : --=--<t~ xp~_ -,!_J c'-\~l~~--~-~~-- ____ ~, __ ---:.~--~~,-~-,- I --_r-r.~,nTr ~/ ~ JjI 'S:-~<ll--J--.~....: ~ ---.1. c:i ---;-- - lor ..-.l E g , € 2 \-II 't% (.) I L\J UJ ~ 0;:, ~""G L\J ;" ~ 'i.. off-romp Extg. .ground @ 28' left Driven piles . "', ~ Cl, ~ ....... '.:::' 'C: ,I E Extg ground @ "LN 1" Line ~ (.) ~ 8 ~ u ...... Extg. ground @ 40' right ,400 ,380 '360 p ~ Exp. l:iX. I~J - /,I'~ ~ 4~ If Co ~ ~ ,I 2 U ~~ L- ! .-____,kX I ~~ I 4J - ~ Franklin Blvd. ! / R?il transition' I., up\:~~_~~-=__ ~~prilled shafts, Bents 5-10 RR R/W RR R/W ~ ~ U L o / C o " o ~ " ~ / U U U / ~ g 6.1 DATE " / m " / " ~ u ." o L ~ / Z " " ~ , c '" ~ , c . " "'<3 <\j. ~ 'EO \= Temporary clearance ___e:v~:~~__~_ , . I . ITap of roil I. , I 12'-0"1 I 12'-0", I ., ,. I I min. I I min. I , " -=:-:._~~=--...-J~-= DEVELOPED ELEVATION Scale, 1"050' Note: Elevations are based on Vertical Datum. 1988. ~I/ ~ 'Trock/ ~/ ~ ~ Track " c:: g .€ ~ c , " C)<3 ~I .....:: ~ '" C\J 8 Profile gradeJine @ "LN 1" Line ;.50% .~ "LNI" 685+11.28 PV! F' 500.38 ,\:-2.50% 2005' VC Proposed structur--: yRADELINE DIAGRAM No Scale the North American GENERAL RAILROAD CLfARANCES~ No Scale Existing bridge Nos. 08329. 19620 DESIGN \ ~~ STRUCTURE NO. WILLAMETTE R. & HWY 15 & UPRR, HWYS 1 & lW < \),-S~G:c-i-~G")JrOREGONDEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATION ........... 1-5: WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE - BUNDLE 220 ,>-'" C-'- C)'O ) DATE PACIFIC HIGHWAY ( \)~'?'\'>-~I'l.,:>1 .. _~,_ ""cowmraU8"oo"w"W8ru1ENCOREfl""""'~ __9/25108.. LANE COUNTY \cc-C C) ~ CONSUlTING =-=s"""SE.,,,",''''s<w'<OREfJON''''''''' CALC. BOOK PLAN AND ELEVATION ~ ;::"G:::;:::, =::::::;w-="s'==:~GON""""" .nnn' NB DECK ARCH - CONCRETE APPROACH I J!ri Strasky, Ph.D., P.E Consulting Engineer SHEET REVISION BY ..Yl/HM~. - DRAFTER, OF OESIGNER, Andrew Howe. P.E. DRAWING NO. - CHECKER, ACCOMPANIED BY DWGS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; - :3 REVIEWER, " ~ m N N o m o --~_ o N .' ~ ~ /77777777 ~ --- ,-- T~--- , "'" ------._~ ~ ~ s tr) 1:1 -. I S _ ~" , ,I 0 V) " 1;) J c: C\J LL":LLLLL~[?) 6 Q. ~ e ~@; ~ --~I;r==r I- (>.- ,i ~...... / Sj L.J...... ..., 0;)...... " ..c:: ~ ~ ,) ~ " 2 ~ V) 30::: i ~ -., ~ ~ i: V) ,., ----- Pe - - - - - ~ -!'E._EES!!,,!!,!! ~- (/l~ - \ "'LS1" -- I 'l~ /, 600.00' Sp., , , 5 3045'OO,~~IiTl1j ~ O ~(~-If-- --",," ,,'I o .208.> ==- c o u I u ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ o o u ~ 'T w ~ ~ . Scale: 1"=50' if Bent 8 if Bent 9 , I 581'-4" rail pay length. typo ea. side I ]'-6" Type "F" roll, typ.. see' Dwg. BR290 Slope paving. 10'-0" tall protective fencing w/I see Dwg.8R115 I splashboords over railrood. typo Fill 1 ....:rlx. if UPRR . --Pix, iEXP.j/ - _____ ~. ~_~l-:-':~~",-~'~.~j=-""/- ~I~~~~~-~-.~ ~ ~--~:;'~~:-i ~DrivenPiles U " <:: . ~ Q..l € 0 t:o ~ '::: <3 U ::: ~ If. off -romp Extg. ground @ 28' left I 2 0""': <.0 '- ;;, (] ,* i3 ,I ~ Extg. ground @ "LSr Line C\l ~ 8 ~ 0 . Extg. ground @ 40' nght if Bent 4 I if Bent 7 I if Bent 10 I I . if Bent 5 v:. Bent 6 , , J 18'-0" rail pay length. typ..ea. side ! 5tandord j-tube curb mQunt roil. typ.. se~ Dwg. BR20B !! !,! / Raillransitian I I I if .9' txp. . rx I~FIX tXP'iup. ~_ '. _' - ~~I~~ 1l I ~t"-~~ ~ -~-- ~,~~ 'u ~ 2 I T -I~'. ~- F'i ,I ~ € Fronk/in Blvd. ~ Drilled shofts. LJ r-... u Bents 5-9 RR R/W RR R/W I . \ ;~~:;~;~ry ctearance . I ~----~--~~ ~ ~ : 12'-0"i I [12'-0": ~" ~ I " ,. I a <3 I mm. I I min. I l... ti I ' 'I I.\J R ~I~ . _ -1~ _,~L .~ . ........../" if Track~ "-v:. Track GENERAL RAILROAD CLEARANCES ~ m o m " .560 -540 "'q) -520 '" . "-- -500 ~ - .~ -480 Q. ~ -460 t =440 lcJ _ -420 -400 -380 Main spon u w m o " / . " ~ o o o L o o ~ / ~ < o r ~ o L o / C o .~ o r . " / U o U / o ~ ^ ~. U DATE " / m " ~ . r o " '0- J: ACCOMPANIED BY DWGS. / Z DEVELOPED ELEVATION Scale, 1""50' Profile gradeline @ "LS 1" Line "L51" 385+ 12.00 PVI EI. 500.08 1l ~ g <n~ , Q , '" ">" C\J. ~ '" 2.50% - -2.50% 200S'Vr. Proposed structure GRADELINE DIAGRAM No Scale Nate, I Elevations are based on the North American Vertical Datum. 1988. I Jiri Strasky, Ph.D., P.E. ConsufUng Engineer SHEET Existing bridge Nos. 08329. n DESIGN \;JIF. I SlRUCTURE NO. '\ <:Jx,S~c,~",\--c" )7Jr OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ... '~;~E""- f(-\--' 0-ex, I ()'Q I ( \)s~'\~~I'l-':> ~ CorpoIDluOfflc6 920COUNmraUBRCWJ.sunn(XJ8EUGENE,OREGCW9T40/.(DJ!) ..fJ/'?-!?!Q?. \ ;>-c'c a I: CONSVLnNG oWsMlSSKJNST1ffrSE S!JlE/OOSAill( ~913P1295 I CALC. BOOK ~- ENGINEERS I.tlS"POPI.ARIl'M; MffFOR() ~9F.l)4S2/)1 ~ ww.vobet:.oom .5CtI:5"SWME4OOKSROAD.S/JflE/.ro./.AJ<E~0REGCW9l504-4288 _ 19620 No Scale IBY I - DRAFTER: I~:::~: REVISION ..Y!IHMS WILLAMETTE R. & HWY 15 & UPRR. HWYS 1 & lW 1-5: WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE - BUNDLE 220 PACIFIC HIGHWAY LANE COUNTY PLAN AND ELEV A lION SB DECK ARCH - CONCRETE APPROACH OF .............. Andrew Howe. P.E. ORAWING NO. 4 REVIEWER, " ~ o ~ N o ~ o o N , ~ N , ~ 1'-83j," rail 14'-0" shld. a v 1 ;-,r;. 'Jcj ~~ r c o u ~ U 4 o ~ ~ ~ 4 U 4 ? ~ := ~. m ~ o ~ " u w m o N o / . . c u o o L ~ ~ 4 / ~ 4 o ~ ~ o L o / C o " )' . " / U o U / m ~ !'. I DATE I " / ~ " / . ~ o ." o ci:: ACCOMPANIED BY OWGS. / Z I I I I 'l----,J- I' I I I I I ~ ---<:) . REVISION If structure 1 1 "LN 1" Uno I I I 67'-5~u '0-0 structure 64'-0" roadway 12'-0" lane 12'-0" 12'-0" lone lane 1 ! , I !6'-0" I~ , 1 I , 1 101 5/.=vories Q - " ..:..~ -: -' ~ '" '-' m " 0- I I' 3 spaces @ 15'-8";;;: 47'-0" ~= A T BENT - SB SIMILAR TYPICAL SECTION - NB Scale: ;/a"= 1'-0" BY '(>[!IHMS DRAfTER, DESIGNER, Andrew Howe, PE CHECKER, REVIEllER, 14'-0" shld. Varies 1'-8')1," 1'-83j," roil - rail ;J [--cr- . I Varies, , typo I' 6'-1":t min. I60-5ur -max. jFiniSh ground l~ I I I i----,VJ . Drilled shaft. typo I I I I I ~ ---<:) If structure . I "LSJ" Line- 1 I 1 67'-51f2" 0-0 structure 64'-0" 'roadway 14'-0" shld. 12'-0" lane 12'-0" lane 14'-0" shld. I 1'-83j," rail 12'-0" lone 1 i! '6'-0"1 ~ , 1 1 , , I 1 51.::varies ~ Q , " ~: co '-' m " --, ~Std.3-lube curb ~ mount rail. typo See [Mg. BR208 UJ~ l1d~;, " . typo ~I-'::; ... [ bent 1 1 T ! "' 1 u _....d_._ : 1 -j~ f Varies. I ~ Precast concrete tub girpers. typo E31 f J spaces @ 15'-8" = 47'-0" AT MIDSPAN - NB SIMILAB TYPICAL SECTION - S8 Scale, \la"e ]'-0" Finish grOUnd~ ~ I I I I '-.-l---,J I , I Drilled slloft. tyP.~ I : l_-+::::J TYPICAL SiDE VIEW - BENT Scale, Ya"e ]'-0" Existing bridge Nos. 08329. 19620 I Jiri Strasky, Ph.D, PE. Consulting Engineer DESIGN \ J~ I STRUCTURE NO'1 WILLAMETTE R. & HWY 15& UPRR, HWYS 1 & lW SHEET \)X-S$,~"'~(,')] rOREGONDEPARTMENTOFTRANSPOR;ATION ......... 1-5: WILLAMETTE RIVER. BRiDGE BUNDLE 220 OF ~~(\",GX- ~~'O ) I DATE PACIFIC HIGHWAY ..'" _../ $x-'i''\I'~I'l-S ~ __""COWTfI>'QL6RrWJ."""WBa.GNE.OREGON'"'''''''' ..9/25(08 LANE COUNTY DRAWING NO. \ ,GC; () I: CONSULTING ="="mE"O<; '""""'''''" OREGON'''''''''''. 1 CALC. BOOK TYPICAL SECTIONS ~_ ENGINEERS 1335 F'OPlNlI:R\.F, 1.IE1Y<RJ cmJON 9l504S!O' _ _ _ _~ . __ __= ","SW"""""""""SU",''''lAKE=OREGON",,,,-QBB SPANS 4. 5 AND 6 ~ ~ m N N o ~ o o N , ~ N , m c " u N ~ u ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ 'T ~ 0 ~ ~ , ~ m 0 m 0 u w ru 0 N 0 / " . C 0 0 0 L 0 0 ~ / ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 L 0 / c .Q ]'-8'h" rail ~ o ~ " ~ / U o U / ~ 52 A v' 1......1 DATE 0- / m 0- / " ~ o ." o ci:: ACCOMPANIED BY owes._ / " Existing bridge Nos. qSJ29. 19620 DESIGN \ .S.T,R,U,C,T.U...R.E.N,O,'I WIllAMETTE R. & HWY 15 & UPRR, HWYS 1 & IW 0,-s~C,:C.i--\>-c," \11IrOREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE 1-5: WIllAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE - BUNDLE 220 x" ,-' Jill!' PACIFIC HIGHWAY \ 0<<-'" ~C; ,0'0 . _ .... ,-~"",o/l.S ~. _.'_""COUNmra."'",,",SW"""fWENE,ORflXW''''''_ 9/25108.. lANE COUNTY ,.GG 0 I: CONSULTING ""'""""'srr<u,^sw"""'""", CREGON''''''''' . CALC. BOOK TYPICAL SECTIONS ,....,- ENGINEERS 1335 POPu.R ll'rn; I.IffRJR[J CJRE(;W 9lS04S201 , __ --= ""'SW~_SWE,,,,,,",,,as.rooORflXW",,"'- . '...... SP ANS 7. 8. 9 AND 10 (j; structure I I "LNJ" Line I I I 67'-51/;." 0-0 structure 64'-0" roadway I 12'-0" lone , 14'-0" shld. 14'-0" shld. 12'-0" lane 12'-0" lone I ! , I !6'-0"i I , , I I , I Q. . 0>, ~: co u ~ " r :J ~ l Sf.=vories ./ 6. ~"'- ,"" '" .~ /17'-0"1 ~p' -------->-- 3 SDoces @ 15'-8'; 0 47'-0'; / Finish ground Ai7~_=- ___....1...________ , , ~r_-_~~-----T-_:_~Drilled ShOft._ typo LA::! c>--J A T BENT - SB SIMILAR TYPICAL SECTION - NB Scale, %"0 ]'-0" REVISION BY ..r(/HML.. DRAFTER: DESIGNER, Andrew Howe, PE - CHECKER: REVIEWER: 'f structure "L51" Line Varies I I I 67'-sIh" 0-0 structure 1'-8'h" 1 '-8'h " roil roil 64'-0" roadway 1'-8'h" rail 6'-1"j: min. 16"-5"j: max. 12'-0" . 12'-0" 12'-0" 14'-0" I lane lane shld. 1 . ~ 10'-0" tall protec'tive l j :/ fencing w/splashboords , 6'-0" I I over railroad. typo ,Ji; ~ : ]'-6" Type "F" roll, ~~ I ~ co .g . i S/.~varies f" typo See 0...9. BR290 I ',~ /'"~:'O--'DTU riIY', ' ""-Precast concrete , 7'-0" tub girders. typo typo 14'-0" shld. lane 3 spaces @ 15'-8" ~ 47'-0" AT MIDSPAN - NB SIMILAI3 TYPICAL SECTION - S6, Scale, 1/8'0 1'-0" Ii: Dent I I I I 1 I I I ! I I I I I I 1 Finish grOUnd~ ! -ff~ --!~ ,--1-- -, Drilled shaft, typo ~: ~ 1" , . . ~-, -rJ . ,....k::J ----.:... TYPiCAL SIDE VIEW - BENT Scale, %"01'-0" I Jiri Strasky, Ph.D., P.E. ConsuHing Engineer SHEET OF DRAWING NO. ~., '" "- N "" N o co o o N "- "" N "- <n C 0> 1) ci> c '6 o o -' , .. 6 , en <n o en 6 /' "- .. o +-. <t- o L o /' C .2 +- o +- ~ '" /' 1) o 'U /' en en o ~ o /' en 6 /' '" +- o w '0' L "- /' ,::2:1 General Notes: The bridge Is designed with an allowance of 25 psf for future wearing surface, an allowance of 100 pounds per lineal foot for utilities and all of the following live loading according to "the current //AASHTO'. LRFD Bridge Design Speclflcatlons//: Service and Strength- 1 Limit States: HL -93: Design load' Strength - 2 Limit State: ODOT Type STP-5C permit truck ODOT Type STP-5BW permit truck' 18k 20k 20k 20k t ) t t t ! 12'-0" 15'-6"14'-6:j 20k 20k 20k t t t 15'-0" 15'-0'15'-0"1' 20k 20k 20k t t t 16'-0" 15'-0'15'-0"! 43'-0" 20k 20k 20k t t t 15'-0"15'-0':1 ODOT PERMIT VEHICLE TYPE OR-STP-4E . No Scole 12k t I 24k 24k 24k 24k t t t t 18'-0" 14'-6'j' 14'-0" 15'-0"1 24k 24k t t 15'-0"1 24k 24k t t 16'-0" /4'-6'j 32'-0" ODOT PERMIT VEHICLE TYPE OR-STP-5BW No Scole TYPICAL LOADINGS No Scale , J CANOE CANAL BRIDGE PLANS ~ '\ ." ? , " '" , ~ ':-"'..;C::"-:;:~;',8~1;-i,-~;'~;i"~-'::".';':-"::'-.;-::--'-':;-:i~-~:"-.'~':~5~~~J~~':;'/--.:.:"7.-;~/-.:- ~.. /.- - R/l;; i c. <..J Ii" , 180'-0" cll.-elr. .#' ~ 20'-0" Winf}'t/f}II1 I ~ 'eel [-QirdA(5 or Presl, ""sed Cuncrele 87"90 girders (Preferred /\If.) I 122'-0" WlfH7wall (.) . .....r- {"'/ " 1 ~Jflstal/ black ovolligtJts (ixture ci .~.' ~l- '1 ~, """. - -,,' ~'ff i.. I- w;ll> 32W Irlple-Iube lamp. [nstoll cL- _ ~1'2 I "" ff ' ~ Q. fixture per bridge plans See Special F2 :-~ - -r-:--'~IWJ. \ ~ _0- - - -,- - - - - -or; ( -- __~c ~~CCC ~c 4" '/1 " c,,,,,,", '" .m''''"M''"' oc_"" r---.: 0 ~I:g I r... - _.- - - - - --- - - - - - - - _.:..~':- f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i. !, /" .) & See illurniflotiof! pIons for instaffa/lon or ~ ~ -- -- , I 'I' ,~. , condUit patf/way witt,in ~ridr;1] ~ 2 ~ J ~::~j ~. .'. F'~'~!:~~~:~~~~~~~~i;,:~~~~:~:;~::~~~::'::k ~.~{\ ~~;~.: G"J. 'M"" '--,f~'- [g - 9 ;I~-:';:': ,- - - _/_I\~L: f' =.- -.= = = = = i :.= = = = j~i~ ~ ~ -:.. -:.. -:.. -:.. -_ -:.. -:..-:.. --:.. -:.. _-:.. -,-;- =; i, -~x"II:,q slruc':ro I/o .~ -1- T f';~~ir -- T _Ill IIc,Q. ~I :': ,0621 foterc,novea '" . - j- -.\. _-..'._'---u "00/00, _,_ ___ '<00'- '00"- ., ",' _,2:.--'oo--oo,"-;"':;y.;;--- .oo____~ .. __ ' , ,~I ~!~\,,"" ;- --lL=''''~=-:-==-=t~~.=']I~c,~~.::-=-J?=E:-:'7F== ~,=-:i ~_. y!~ ;)1:::: j" ,--I. II II .-1..--EXICllf]'} Bike POirl "'1 rExi.Siinf} slrue/we NO.)-Std ;()'-1" cr;rlcrefe end pOIIM _---===I==~ '~'_';;'j~ ~ I~ /" ,.y 08187 ro be re'floverJ/ 5e~ 0;11] errl55 for detr.JiJ5 - - - - J - ~i?- - ---- ;;'- - ~- - -j-'- -!1:;~:;2.:: .::.::;;;J : ;=::=::=::;J~-.;:oJ.:::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: =:,' ::::::::: -I~\ - - -1/ - .< . J _1-"' .' 90"'O",~,o,,'::!.. ~ ,i -------.-----Y-----,: ------------ ? ~ ~I~""'" ~\i ri'P-://~~i~__=_======.~ ~====-=I~r-~=.-----._----~,i------[~ "C" '" e,['_'o_C__I_____ \ I, l I,,, -------.-----,---.--- rL,1 L,,,_ g' ! ~ ~I~'" - - - - - --~(~ ] ~.l~ ~:~~~;~= ~~_~ f,-~,~/~:~ J~~l~-~ ~=_~ ~~ ~:~:=--~it:=- ~ ~ ~:; 1- - --- L-----.---,J; Q 'D' I~ "/- -001' 0000 ,. -. au, -,. l'_,_",-oo'-, --,-- - --<00' .---,'00 - u.___ .., . ~ Zb ?i~'" ~ ::: = ~'~-~~'~-~'~'il ".~'~.~.~~.~:f~F.~-~:~.~-~-~ ~ -~-~:= ~-~'~ == ==:: il '.Q ::::I~ ii n - - n -- - -- n - - - IT __n - - n - -- - n - -- n -hi :;; J_t___,_ '= _I 11----.-- -"~-] -- -----_.___._________./,1 ;;; zi:e _ 20'-0" VlinQIIOII!' III J~O'-O~ cir.:.~(. ~ .:'1 i --"pel! n/rd"', c Of P,~es;rc:j5ed Concret9 BT90 '"!i(rJer:; (Preferred Alt.) ~T .",C';~:,,,J ,,~/ ::~~~_ ff T 543.54' \ R ~PLAr-L \ ~\--E.X;Sllng BlkePolt' Bent 2 /! !"LN1" 672'-83.00/1 I .; 1 R/W \1'OJ)JJ ~ I' ~~. -~~~ g-~~,(- ~fF~~~fQ1~~~ ',' ~\ ~, '6'~ . irll~~J~ ~ l ,.,...\ \~\.;,~ 'I ~I' 'i~,_, ..1~&7 ,\-- 'Y---11'::,.~11 ,," !! \.,71.;,J ,I, .---3 LJ\~ ~? -i 11'l'--'"'="- .... I, """ ...., ~I i-9!f....; -. ~ _":'l: _'---/ .. 66-,6 ~,,' d1:Q .l:ci"'_b~~ ~ J.c'r.",' ,-' h, 0"0 ~~~ L2-,<.'~~,,'~- i~.~. /; . ~,'-.'-...,-_-.:.~.- ~ l~" -....::::.::j!gL""_.. ...., .'-0\ /P-.--- ~ ~ '..- ~ ., ./- IQ> ............. - :~~.:::~..7.~-.._;_~~.,..~.~-~i ~ _~~\ ~~~!L_! iil Eugene tJ~,' "':."," .;'~~ L~J.;~ ",~' I ..". I #:l....~-', ~~----..OlL....- ml i~) . : /!t".'~ \'\, 'I 'I ,~f'~~~. .:: ~/ -:/ '.,h~ ,- '~\. I I \'v~ / I I ~2.~_C. :p. T.~7 ~.. R:.~ W,l'!.M:,. LOCA TION MAP ~ < ~ D ;~ No Scale .,.,~ 122'~O" WiWjV/Q// "- ~' c) '" , " "- "1 V, " I I .. I Berll 2. "L5j" f72IB5.0Q LStOfJr!rJ(rf Roil Traflsition. SS8 D'Ilg. BR203 {or'delails (fyp. ']f]cft side. each bridge). Q 5ct;,..----------I ~ . I "LNi" G77+Q8.7.f1 c::;:. EI.175.}2 . . ""- Proposed Structure . "LNi" 668~89.38 EI. 454.83 H/W Scal"3: j".;: 20' ~ t)' ~ w ~, r 430 ; 470 Ie ~ 460 Q:) :... ~. lc '--- 450 ,Rai! Transilion. \ see Ov/g. BR20:; \ 't B;;nl , Slarrdord Type "F" roil. typo See D'IH}. BF?20Q for details ~ .1 f Ben! 2 r c:: t- 440 .'2 :- ~ ~ 430 't).= LUf- 420 E- 410 E . L '400 _ Piti c-I' . -....... / -' o{Je pO'llflg. ~>,. -.... Dwg. BRi 15 .~ "--.....,. See ,Exist., I-Bike 1 Poth . - //d'::--- ______ Driven ,!eel _/.~t~ ..~ . piles. Iyp. ,~~--/I ~EXig. ground @ 28' feO l LUg. Extg. ground , ~ "LNI" GRADELlNE DIAGRAM No Scofe ~ r ~ / " C o u m o c o U / o 0, .D W L o > ". c - - L ~ 2.50% "LSI" 377j.Q9.50 U 475.02 ground @ "L S 1" line @ 40' right ""- Proposed Structure Scale: 1" ;: 20' I/OTE, S8 Shown. NB Similar. "L$]" 369+05.28 EI. 454.93 ELEVA TIOIN o ~ ~ 61 @ I ~-I u :! ACCOMPANIED BY OWGS. / Note: Elevations are based on Verticol Datum. 1988. tlls NtFI/I American "LSI" GRADELlNE DIAGRAM No Scale <3 Rt:VIEII(;l: Scoli M. Nelffelofl. PE ., CONSULTING ~ ENGINEERS ~ ........._oIJ9c.com y.y.LlN INTERNATIONAL Exislinr; bridge No. 08187 I ST~~C~~;~_~O. W\~~~M0ITL~~MRET&TEH~JVE~ 5 B~IDU6:R. I DATE PACIFIC HIGW A Y II -5) 1M. P. IS.e~i,_2o.Q~ LANE COUNTY I CALC. BOOK PLAI~ AND ELEVATION - REPLACEMENT CANOE CANAL HWYS 1 &lW BUNDLE 220 192.991 SHEET m....L. OF .-,,?- DRAWING NO. ~ DR/.FIE": :-:;~ ~r'...~~...it.~:~ ')14 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Josept! E. Krojewski. PE\ '<; vr \ DATE REVISION BY [)(SI{;~ER, C~EC~,ER: ..~,~.~____Q.~.9.'_.7_~.C_.~., . ". " "' ~ ,;.; N '.fj o ~ , C, c, , m " U . 9 in '^ ~ o 0; o o N W n, -: ~ / ~ o o . o c o o / . o .~ cD 0; > ~ . .~~I ~ / :1 I 0- ~ I u DAlE I I I I :::)~::) ::)l~::, j~~:)lL 1'-4" (ail- 14'-0" shoulder " 1 t:Jr:jl[.J[C.,l::'.Jll..:)[':'J~.'i[';:)l:-'))::..:i]C::j[l:ij[ Existing siruclure No. I 19621 10 b"1 ramMed ~ Vories 3'-4" I 1'-4" I (oil- 11'-0" shoulder REVISION I~ 1- CHtC,;;:i<, URM"TER: DESIr.~'~R, / o , ACCOMPANIED BY OWGS.. RE'/IE'NER, / "LN 1" Line , Varies "LS 1" Line 66'-3" Q. - Q. struclure 66'-8" o. - o. structure , 64'-0" rood'llo'l , I 11'-4" - r~ I 1'-4,,1, ro,F [ 12'-0" , 54' -0" rDlJdwo'/ /2'-0" 12'-0" /2'-0" .Ione 14'-0" shou!de{ 14'-0" shoulder 12'-0" lone 12'-0" lane lone lane lone I I """_0'" r;:' bridn'3 y-~ ~ ."' --........~ I . I i, I i 6'-0" I j---i.,- if' tJrid(le ~ It . " C')I'b n r \ J [f: Lt ,-'lffnC'\:"n',":'-,<r'I,TItJEj Varies I \\t .. - - EX/3fl,l? structure No. I 08187 if) lY] remov.']d' 3'-4" ]'-4" 9 spaces @ 6'-3" " 50"-0" fO Precast Prestress'3(j aT90 Varies m' ::-'~~::::".. I lID WILLAMETTE R. & HWY 15 & UPPR, 1-5: WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE - PACIFIC HIGHWAY II-51 (M.P. LANE COUNTY TYPIC,AL SECTION - REPLACEMENT CANOE CANAL 9 spor.es {ji 6'-2" = 60'-0" 10 Prec'Jsl Pre.s/res.sed er90 TYPICAL DECK S-ECTION ICONCRETE--=-PREFEi3RED AL T.I Scale: VB" = l' -0" "L/,-' 1" Line Vori'3s "L.S1" Line 66'-8" G. - o. S{(UCfUre 65'-8" o. - o. structure , 64'-0" roodwav. I I (:_/'-0" r()a(Jwa~ 1i.'-4" 1'-"1"1 . rail rail- 12'-0" 'N 0" t 12'-0". I 14'-0" 14'-0" + I IL - -i- lone T la/Ie I fone T shoulder 5,'/Qulrfer /(Jrle 1 i i 5'-0'" i6'-Q" , fi briorjc............... .~_-J ""-1 I 1--'.._- 'i.. Dridge i i ;-,1g J" 1 ! ! r, V . ;' } _ Varies :~ I I 1-0 j: . ~ . .' 1. _n.n moo ~ I [~_: , ones (~'~!t'''i!~ -HnC=:f:"'l::---~r=Y""':i'-:!~:""r,:;, JIi! ,:=~:rFi :. fin; ilF. ;It'''~uuAUuu, 'J[',',',."',',;',..JJ : uAr~:n.?1TI nn~ IlK /11 Lc,_ 'L,!"""",,,. ',,,,,'C ,,,,,' """'''''7''''-''''''''''''''''"' """'lr~'?'lLN'-AuJ~./llj""./W ~ J :/l' 'n' , ,\ ~.-f/ U'" ,r'~"Y ~ "' ./ W" /' U. E...lstlri() slrvclure .vo. / \f ~ . , 19521 fo ty; removed ------1 c/.Isrlnq slrLclure No I 08187 10 lJe remo'/ed 5'-5" 5 spaces @ 1 }'-2" = 55'-10" 2,'-5" 5'-5'::' 5 spaces @ i 1'-2" = 55'-10" 6 Vlelded Sleel Plol'J G,i,.'der3 ,- 6 Welded Steel Plate Girders Tom Hernandez. DESIGNER .................,...................................~'0-GC- 'i..";\\>- \'i..~ .........-..,......,....................,..... \>-GG '0'i..'-\ c)O Chari;, M. Steams III. p~ '0- iCJ'0 '1-",1 '0" S' ,\1 ". .....---.......-..-,. _"S.. '0- Cl Joseptl E. Krajewski, PE <:(\.. >-. ,x,:' )\>- .~. ..-. - _........-................~..- -----....~.._._.--_. ....- ' Scoff M. Nettle/oo. PE 12'-0" 12'-0" lone 12'-0" Ian'!: TYPICAL DECK SECTION (STEEl) Scole: Va" = 1'-0" + CONSULTING ~ ;::'~~RS Exisling bridge No. 08187 IS TR~C;~~ENO. 1..2,0::-- 1;008- I. C/.LC. BOOK , 714 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "'fY-LlN INTERNATIONAL 11'-0" .'jtiQuldCl H'-O" shQulder [-4" j rail /r:;/ofldard Type ifF I roif. typo !I , 3'-1" , I 11'-4'" J 707/ r Stondard Type "F", I t'lp. II .-'1 5' c:" -" HWYS 1 & i IN BUNDLE 220 192.991 SHEET 2.. OF 2 DRAWING NO. f[ Bent 1 If Ben! 2 'i.. Ben! 3 'i Berlt 4 SfG.3/0+88.9 j Sra. 571 ,./lO.9! 163'-5" ISlo. }7J+96.9 I 510.372/-52.3 . . I 9 -_BT48" Prestressed PrecosrGirders """"" I" '" " "" "" '" " "" ),.. " '" " " , " I Existing Structure No. ~ " " " " " " " " ].. " " 5-2'-0'" 56'-0" 55'-5". " '. /962/ 10 be Removeo '" Span i Spon 2 i Spon ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i /I A' ~ ~ ~~~~d~:26'~i/ J;~o~:~~;~ :~p '" 12'-0" Winqwolf. , /! I //I //" each side each end) " 'yp I 1.-:- 'i' - !f, :;;c ._~~' ,~- -1- ~. ',' -.L :ri..,'-/--/U-----.--"v " '> ~ % -~1~ /,t-----.---- ;rr--~-=.=~~==~lj~;h-7/~ ~rQ ___)! ./.-~ ~-lfI<jtalfbfor;" r;vIJIIi'JtITS {i/{(j,-e : I ~ -=1!2 ' Ir - - - - - - -.- - cy - - - - -if .Jl- ~i~ :,,: ~" ~ en wiln 32/1 Irio/Hum lomr;. !n~'oll ~ l" ' '-- ~I ~ Jo !.loony : !;- - - - - - -- - - -[:;- - - - - -'-, -- -'1:t ~ I - ; ~ -; ~:;: /( " " "" ,6 I ~ ~:;:;'~~;~-~;'~~~i~~:~~ ic~;~~:,:,~~;:JI ':l::';~ " ~"'_.~. _, ' ~ '" " or cr';; ~ B ~I~~~n" :~' ____~i,'_______J-__I_~'U~~~ ~_-_-_-~_-=-~;-- - -,- ------ ~:: condui/pafhwoyv/ltnlrl 'J(ld'j'; 1"1 Z c.u~ -I~=---<u--- --- \-~~:-=--==:=~-----J:~----- I" :]: :fil'I' r i,' '--"LNl"Lwei'...... ,:;.; "if/uetl'ie L""l ;~ '~:::..:: I; : : I :1: I ~I:I : t.n ?; ~ ~l'~ ~ ~Q I' 'l.l..------l-,--'I'~-"-'"~I ~-,- , --'T F _1_ _--_~~~- "r::--d'--:-,--u-:--:-:--'1~" '=~=U_Ul_ ''', ~~_~_:l:,~,_u'___n___~~_u~j'-" ~ i\~ ~J~'2 " ,1lr-~"';-;;;;LI~S lq;;' - -1-;i;--I-;:l;F'r~nl ~~~-iih" _'0- I'" I ~ :'. ':',J, I 1", -=-= _ __ ~l\.l ~Ir tj \;t ,~n~' , n" -"'-Ill ""~,l'':: ~ - -' l-~ i -" ~Jbl:""" n _I: __ _I 1_,iIJ I .. __~,~l!\ _ ~ & - -----:':l:si ----, ",.~ _.~1:'5~ :~2.::~t.--ll~]___________ i +,________L_ ] ~llu~~.-Jt-- ,~- '::.,: _ - _ - n.J - ~ ~ ~ H -::I~ ~ ~ ~ /\ l!! ~-}'I~i--! , L-~~~--:-_r-II . :11:'\\..[ EX/Sf Line! -- t.O,,'';;:: ,tb--l\.l~'ClJ :'\!: :,! ::1:: ..I~ ,l!, \. ~ ~'l) l\JIi5~"ti '\ I; :': :T: -,";-, 'I" \ '''LSl'' L'ne lI) ~ ? ~-, ::I~ ~ - - - -/- ~ ~ Il- -- -- - - - - - ,,_J~~.- - - - - - - -- -"~I.= - ~ 1- - - - - - -;tt;/-. ~-=;:-r- - -- - ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I i5 :' \1[' ",Cut Lwe. I: dl : I: di -;r-ll :.t-'" iTo Creswell t.O E ~ ~'~,j ~ ~ ~- ~I~ )<J"F~--~-oo-~-l--~--:.~-~~~'~--'~.-'-'-'f~-~t::Mf~c .~-:=-=-=::::::::::-:::::'~ 'X' . .~~ ~ L f.~ ~ ~ ~'>- ~I ~ i It--.-.------ -'-'-'-"i+i---'---'-'---'r-'-\-ifj-l~= . \'---'-'-----'-7! i ~_ ~ ~ g'~ C\J.:'.I"'~ __I"'.",,~ il!u-=---------jj---=.-----,---"='i{T,J(cc1,------:)IL ~=.~ C\J a q Exisllng Brid(;;e No. 08181. / \ - ~ Std. 30'-4" concreter",d ponel . Cf3nter porllorl .'0 reml'Jin J i~., rtypJ See DWf). BR1D5 fOf de/ods . '1 . rPropo,:d UP. . "-< ~-\ j Relo,rung 'Nofl , ~ ~ . Exis/lflQ Bike Patll PL t\. N :r~P95ed Bike Path Scale: j" = 20' ~ ~ o ;;; ~ 0_ o " , " N , m c o. u ~ o ~ CO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ " o u c o " / o o o 'C W L ., > ii' o e .- ~ /....1 ~ 1 ~ I 0- '! I u z 480 Ii Bent 3 rf Bent 4r5tondord Type "F" rail. typo i See Dwq. BR20Q r or details ! I Ii Bent 1 ! , i Ii Benl2 , , , 470 r Roil Transi/ion, I see Dvtt). BR20 j I ij ___ ___ _ICV-~'- - u___ um' -Pin- f p'n - Exp. I~' 0 . . T nven ,Exist., i k;j / Steel Piles. -~- i IB'ke I typo Bike ' Path I Path I ! '-- C.J.P. Retaining I Wall ~ :-- 460 ~ c l~ ~ 450 ~? c :- 440 .'2:- ~ ~ 430 ~ c L;j' 420. or ....~~" [ ;i~~"':;". Prop. Grode @ "SB1"'~ ;-1 4'-0" dio, Drilled Shoft. ,.- i typo /' ! I ~~;~~tions are oo;ed on the. North American I Vertical Datum. 1988, NOlL S8 Shown. NO Similar. l ~ 410 400 ELEVATIQJ'l.. Scale: 1" = 20' " o~ TE I 1 1 1 ~ DESIGNER c"- At>-'>2'." ,S' ,,\V' <;>.CC ?-'(; c{6 \,0'" ,as 7.'01. > ",'0 aCOr \,,,--1' ,\\:. \)t>- Existing bridge No. 08187 I ST~~C;~;~_:~. i .. <;~!~tT;QQ8 I_~A_L~._BO_O_K_ WILLAMETTE R. & HWY 15 & UPPR, 1-5: WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE - PACIFIC HIGHWAY (1-5) (M.I~. LANE COUNT'Y PLAN AI~D ELEVATION - WIDENING CANOE CANAL ,_Jg~~J!.~!!.!.o[!Q,}/_ DRAf-TER, )14 OREGON DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATI~N REVISION BY DESIC~tR, Cflor/ie M. Steams "'fY-LlN INTERNATIONAL Rl:VIE'liER: Scoll M. Neil/elan. .., CONSULTING ~ ;:!.r:::;:RS CHECKER: ,Joseph ~.~.~_..g~.9-.:_.:,-_ -- ~ ::; ACCOMp'Ai'-!IED 8Y OWGS. o ) I UuW ~ ~L.-tb-""',f-: - -i,/(I ~~_.J_ .. p""- '...~--r'_ , ~~~r\,\~~_ 'l"~1 '.. ,'r *J~' ~ . I '.,.., (:" \ ::1'" 0-1. ,! - .) -8T --- ~A -,,~ ';-". ~ ,._ . .", ~ll ' a. Ii ! \P, ~ ,I '1:;:;;- ~I \ '~... ~ -II i ':'1 fl ~t "'~ --.... c. ...... ',. " ~2'.1-:f-.....-.~-,_",. . .... ':--.<J ' 'i' 0 6 .. I 6; ~'~ !. ~ -. - "::::...... ~, '?:rO -' de: 0;-"- --"--.C .....-...:,~ ./.{:'c-I (hI ifli' -....~ ~'c~.~.'''''''''-~.....'''" ~~i J < ~/lif;.z~<""'>~~ ~... I V ~.~,.'_..''''>-;'' ">-<.<" I -I ~ ~I ~h.....!,"' k" la~ ~ < ," ~-=-- : "" "Y.$ /.... - ""." ,. ~-'II -/- :;f,--_l../' ~ 'm"'''- ':\ I' ' --=-- -:::-L~./i7.,-\;' '~~ t .~.'Rl II I ~t ~ "r;:: s ~-"', Eo,~ 'Go -:10,,,.. ~ "'~.. i ..:d,:l,(l;{';!: ,., '"';'\,~~' ~~. -n .." .,. '~"",,-. ., .... \! <1//, ! ~ ~ '-", -.. .'>;.~, GkIDwood _ I ~'-d))IPI/.;'IIII"~-;r'" .... _ . j( ,/ ,'~\ 7, \ '" !! [~2.~_c. ~3, T.~7~...R~,1W. w.M"L LOCA TION MAP No Scale ~50% !:::,. "LNI" 677+08.78 - . D. 475.32 c:- ' . : "-- P,-of)fJ5'jdSiructure "LN 1" 668+85.38 D. 154.83 'HII" GRADELlNE DIAGRA.M No Scofe "LSl" 37'7-1'09.50 EI. 4"15.02 "-- Proposed Structure "L.S J" 369/-06.28 EI. 454.93 "LSI" GRADELlNE DIAGRAM No Scale HWYS 1& IW BUNDLE 2-20 192.99) SHEET .1. OF -,,-.. I DRAWING NO. 1---- ~ < ~ '" "' ::::; ~ 00 o o ~.J , " " , 00 "NBI" LiMe; , Varies "58]" Line I .. 1,,1 lr~ll- I Vori'JS lane lane I I 11'-4" -llrrJi! 14'-0" .shoulder - I 1 ~-St(JrIda(rj .]1 (Oil. /'1P. r' Type "F" 14'-0" sf/GuIder 12'-0" 12'-0" lane lone 12'-0" ItJ"e 11'-0" shoulder i I 64'-0" rood'llo'f , 6'i'-O" roodl/loV n 11 n " ' !,!','-_:..i,r.c'.,:,~.,,',"_-"_"'_!:""-"""'"_i,:,'_'--',-_'!:_ .-,._:l,-m--_'._ _._,~:-n,:-- ,-,,'i;{,n-,,'r ',::'iG;:' flTf:" '!fl' 'f' ,",:!,--tlr l' ,__,- ,_,,_ _ _' _" ',- '_ ',' '-I 'n ,,!e', "eo,,,Jeo,,,Jl"i!S-"'n-J" ~::n__"'___ ' ___,';',4 l Exisliflq s/ructur,: No. -- / \ 19621 If) be rr;:fnC'/9u' --! Precast Prestressed BT 48". Iyp. 'I~ . u Cr)<::; '" Ir-'o'"'''' J1 j_~,_m___ I, 12'-0" , I /'\ ~2" loll CO{jcr~te r / . ,\edian DO' rr~r I ==n=cLr-jJJc':;..-~-..:".__...--"_:~,----J.._"',~~~ E-:mm..,.:,~ __n,~_:,mm./,.__\n-..:::,mm..,jl.n.nmn,:i, T -lr L-EXiSlifl;~~/ructu~~.~o. 08187. ceni'J( /Jortioil to re/lObi/o/e /0 remain 11'-0" :;hou/dc,~ 12:-0" lone 12'-0" TYPICf,L DECK SECTION Scofe: ~" = 1'-0" v/~~~ Dec.': Re//ouili/aticfI c lj, u " ~ 51 '. ro ~ i3 o ~ W "; --; ~ ~ / <5 c o u . o c o U / . 0' .~ W L " > ~ . / 0; REVI[IIU1, + CONSULTING ~ ;:;:;;RS TY-LlNINTERNATIONAL Existing bridge No. 08181 I STR~C;~~E_~O. 1..'ie;,^T;99? - I CALC. BOOK WIU.:AMETTE R. & HWY 15 & UPPR, 1-5: WILLAMETTE RIVER BRIDGE - PACIFIC HIGHWAY ([-51 IM.P. LANE COUNTY TYPICAL SECTION - WIDENING CANOE CANAL HWYS 1 & IW BUNDLE 220 192.99) SHEET ....2_.. OF 2 DRAWING NO. ORAFTER, rom Hemondez DESIGNER --- -.. - _..- ~0-GV ~"\I' s'\\ _ -" _ _ --,.. 1'C,c,S "S--l~'6 Charlie M 51earns III PE~ ,0- "cY ct.''o I _ _ 'i)S'" 0-'" 00) Joseph [ Kraj(]V/s~l. PE ?'-- )... "S.o )1' * - ~ - )"1),1 M. Nelllelon pr. 11 ORE~ON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATlON ~ 61 DATE , I @ 0- ~ I u RE'JlSION et OESIGr.ER, CHECKER: ~ ACCOMPANIED BY owes. _.._.. Figure