The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 10/7/2008 City of Springfield ,j Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Original Submittal Development Issues Meeth'lg (DIM) . Date Receiveu: OCT - 7 2008 . - . ....... Prospective Applicant Name: Lonqlev F. McSwain, ALA Icompany: IAddress: I I Prospective Applicant's Rep.: Icompany: I Address: , I Property O~ner: Cht:II:cb of Jesus Christ of ~aints I ----- Company: 50 East N~ple Street----.. Fax: 503-743-3293 !Address: ~e City, UT 84150 See.. CL--+tac..hed c.op ~ IASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-30 ITAX LOT NOeS): 1800 I Property Address: Not assiqned ISize of Property: 5.29 , I Description of If you are filling In this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: See attached Exhibit A IExistina Use: Vacant 1# of Lots/Parcels: N/A' . IAvg. Lot/Parcel Size: N/A McSwain & Woods, Architects and Planners Phone: 541-269-0618 I Fax: 541-267-4225 I M~ ~ l<<c-S&0>04/'IJ -~.~ I Iphone: 503~625-5529 IFax: 503-625-4169 800 N. Bayshore Drive, Coos Bay, OR 97420 Longley F. McSwain, ALA (see above address) Mark O. Cottle, Land Use Planner Mark O. Cottle, Land Use Planner PO Box 1124, Sherwood, OR 97140 Phone: 503-743-4504 Acres ~ Square Feet 0 sf I Density: N/ A du/acre Prospective Applicant: ~~~). W- "t~re Longley F. McSwain, ALA Print Date: 10/8/2008 Case No.: zo1J ~Ef... r DlJQ~w in h J 0'/$ Reviewed by:~f I . . I / Application Fee: $ SJ../. aG Technical Fee: $0 . PostaQe Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ br2/.00 I PROJECT NUMBER: p(2S7JJa~c(x)51 Revised 1(1/08 Molly Markarian 1 of 3 ( J' City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, {)R ~7477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) .. . , , Prospective Applicant Name: Icompany: Dat~ R80elved: Phone: Fax: !~W~~':;~;'_'iJ.''''''4'''__'~;0',*_,*lB_''''__''''''''~''0o@F'''0'0''_'_l"""''''''''_'_'''_''''Pi',_,,,,J I Prospective , Applicant's Rep.: Original Submittal Phone: Icompany: Fax: IAddress: PropertY Owl1er: ' \.)P. g: 13elle~ Icompanv: 5 t Spdl1qttLld LLC IAddress: 75/0 k0-r0l~ t:n S-fe, /01. .R.f'nol NVf5q..&J1I Ii(;L~~~01smlWW\m:.sti4h"ii-(;e;SmmM8iaill:\.::J%i'01'i1%1I"14~;FJ2*fiWiMih&1F_'1t~_40~f10;t;'ji\Wi0f$%t1%M1A1L'#0W%;1ili1Ei}\i-"jST0F1~;L{.j"%iliii;if1i0?tWi11!0i1~J.4ili;4i&vK1ftr).;..j#;;;-0;;* [ASSESSOR;S MAP NO: ITAX LOT NOeS}: I Property Address: Phone: '715':' 853- ~114- 1'15-853-41)& Fax: Size of Acres D Description of ~f you are filling in this fonn by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Existinq Use: # of Lots/Parcels: Prospective Applicant: . Lot/Parcel Size: sf I du/acre Date: Signature Print . -, - , . Case No.: IAPPlication Fee: $ ITOTAL FEES: ION 2oo&-D003b Date: 10/7 J08 ITechnical Fee: $0 62/00 61J Cf) Reviewed bV:~' Ipostaqe Fee: $0 . PROJECT NUMBER: P~1 ;Z Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 1 of 3 ., " Development Issues Meeting Process l The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of knowndevelopment opportunities and constraints. The status may changeover time as development conditions or standards change. .... "J' . '. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application .. The application must conform to the 'Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. , .:'~: .I :'i :"'J J" . Development issues meetings are' conducted every ThurSday. .We strive to conouct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. , ~ The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant s~aff in"preparation for the 'f. t If-. .... ... ~."' . .. <'" ,~-- '.~ J. - . , ., I 'meetin'g: I . '. ',', ;'... l .:".' J ;:,: to'. ~ :.:' ., \' , " ~. _~\.: (:'2 ", ~: i "('. ,. . 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues 'Meeting ,", , " . '".' .' ~ .... , ':\' ',. '- '." -- . ' , , .. The applicant ~nd 'any design' team: shduld -iittehdth'e d~\iel'ripfnen't\issues meeting. . The meeting is scheduled for one hour. . Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. . The meeting is informal and the City will. issue no staff report. .,<1\,,', '.\....: " , -' . (')\ . . . ,t. ,~" , " ,:'\ , ' . . . \ ~, 1 .,\--i '.1", -, ~. i, J _~. ';'. r' 1 .r.. ,..r ~ j,J Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist -,\ ~ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. ~ Development Issues Meeting Application Form ~ Five (5) Questions -list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. ~ Ten (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal RequIrements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. ~ Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" ~ Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' ~ North arrow ~ Date of preparation ~ Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number ~ Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area ~ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points ~ On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained ~ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions o Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots ~ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review o Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces '. Date Received: . Parking and circulation plan o ~ OCT - 7 2008 Revised 1/1/08 Molly Marl<arlan Original Submittal ''>t3 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL October 3, 2008 JOB NO.: 0428 TO: City of Springfield Development Services Dept. 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 ATTN: Dayette Kelly RE: LOS Springfield - New Legacy Springfield, Oregon WE TRANSMIT I2J Attached o Copy of letter o Shop drawings o Change order o Under separate cover via o Prints I2J Plans o Samples o Specifications I COPIES' DATE 11 11 11 11 110 I . NO. . DESCRIPTION Check # 14599 totalinq $521.00 for Development Issues Meetinq Development Issues Meetinq (DIM) application Questions for staff Exhibit A Full size sets of drawinqs - sheets G1.0. CO.1. CO.2, C2.1, L 1.1, L 1.2, L13, L1A, AU, A2.1, A2.2, E1.0 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW o For Approval I2J For Your Use o Approved As Submitted. o Approved As Noted o Retumed For'Corrections o Resubmit Copies For Approval o Submit Copies For Distribution o Return Corrected Plans o As Requested o For Bids Due o For Review And Comment o Prints Retumed After Loan To Us REMARKS Date Received: Kelly, Please find enclosed our submittal for Development Issues Meeting (DIM). OCT - 7 2008 If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Original Submittal Thanks. Copy To: Signed by: ~ ~~~~..1lR. Title: Project Architect McSwain & Woods, AlA. PO Box 577 . Coos Bay, OR 97420.541.269.0618. FAX 541-267-4225. mcsnwds@ucinet.com 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 541-726-3759 Phone y of Springfield Official Receipt uevelopment Services Department Public Works Department RECEIPT #: 3200800000000000691 Date: 10/07/2008 I :47:38PM Job/Journal Number ZON2008-00036 Description CTY Development Issues Mtg Payments: Type of Payment Check Paid By MCSW AIN & WOODS Item Total: Check Number Authorization Received By Batch Number Number How Received Amount Due 521.00 $521.00 Amount Paid ddk 14599 In Person Payment Total: $521.00 $521.00 Date Received: OCT - 7 2008 Original Submittal cRcccintl Page t of I 10/7/2008 ~i . The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Springfield Oregon Stake Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist Five (5) Questions 1. Are there any overall impediments foreseen by the City of Springfield to the approval of the LDS Church development shown on the submitted drawings? 2. Are the utilities proposed by Marcola Meadows development team generally approvable in the configuration presented by that developer to the City of Springfield? 3. What is the process and time frame anticipated by the City of Springfield for the reviewing and approval of our anticipated amendment to the Marcola Meadows Master Plan? 4. What is the process and time frame for approval of the Discretionary Use for the LDS Church Development, and is it sub~equent to or concurrent with the Master Plan amendment process? 5. What is the anticipated time frame for approval of construction drawings for the Marcola Meadows development team designed site utilities serving the LDS Church site? Have the Marcola M~adows developers indicated their time line to serve this site to the City of Springfield? Date Received: OCT - 7 2008 Original Submittp'1 ,.1 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints Springfield Oregon Stake EXHIBIT A New 24,320 sJ. single story church building with 68'-0" total height steeple, free standing pavilion and 300 parking spaces. Date Received: OCT - 7 2008 Original Submittal