HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 10/7/2008
City of Springfield
,j Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Original Submittal
Development Issues Meeth'lg (DIM) .
Date Receiveu:
OCT - 7 2008
. - . .......
Prospective
Applicant Name: Lonqlev F. McSwain, ALA
Icompany:
IAddress:
I
I Prospective
Applicant's Rep.:
Icompany:
I Address:
,
I Property O~ner: Cht:II:cb of Jesus Christ of ~aints
I -----
Company: 50 East N~ple Street----.. Fax: 503-743-3293
!Address: ~e City, UT 84150 See.. CL--+tac..hed c.op ~
IASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-30 ITAX LOT NOeS): 1800
I Property Address: Not assiqned
ISize of Property: 5.29
,
I Description of If you are filling In this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: See attached Exhibit A
IExistina Use: Vacant
1# of Lots/Parcels: N/A' . IAvg. Lot/Parcel Size: N/A
McSwain & Woods, Architects and Planners
Phone: 541-269-0618
I Fax: 541-267-4225 I
M~ ~ l<<c-S&0>04/'IJ -~.~
I
Iphone: 503~625-5529
IFax: 503-625-4169
800 N. Bayshore Drive, Coos Bay, OR 97420
Longley F. McSwain, ALA (see above address)
Mark O. Cottle, Land Use Planner
Mark O. Cottle, Land Use Planner
PO Box 1124, Sherwood, OR 97140
Phone: 503-743-4504
Acres ~
Square Feet 0
sf I Density: N/ A
du/acre
Prospective
Applicant:
~~~). W-
"t~re
Longley F. McSwain, ALA
Print
Date: 10/8/2008
Case No.: zo1J ~Ef... r DlJQ~w in h J 0'/$ Reviewed by:~f
I . . I /
Application Fee: $ SJ../. aG Technical Fee: $0 . PostaQe Fee: $0
TOTAL FEES: $ br2/.00 I PROJECT NUMBER: p(2S7JJa~c(x)51
Revised 1(1/08 Molly Markarian 1 of 3
(
J' City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, {)R ~7477
Development Issues Meeting (DIM)
.. .
, ,
Prospective
Applicant Name:
Icompany:
Dat~ R80elved:
Phone:
Fax:
!~W~~':;~;'_'iJ.''''''4'''__'~;0',*_,*lB_''''__''''''''~''0o@F'''0'0''_'_l"""''''''''_'_'''_''''Pi',_,,,,J
I Prospective
, Applicant's Rep.: Original Submittal Phone:
Icompany: Fax:
IAddress:
PropertY Owl1er: ' \.)P. g: 13elle~
Icompanv: 5 t Spdl1qttLld LLC
IAddress: 75/0 k0-r0l~ t:n S-fe, /01. .R.f'nol NVf5q..&J1I
Ii(;L~~~01smlWW\m:.sti4h"ii-(;e;SmmM8iaill:\.::J%i'01'i1%1I"14~;FJ2*fiWiMih&1F_'1t~_40~f10;t;'ji\Wi0f$%t1%M1A1L'#0W%;1ili1Ei}\i-"jST0F1~;L{.j"%iliii;if1i0?tWi11!0i1~J.4ili;4i&vK1ftr).;..j#;;;-0;;*
[ASSESSOR;S MAP NO: ITAX LOT NOeS}:
I Property Address:
Phone:
'715':' 853- ~114-
1'15-853-41)&
Fax:
Size of
Acres
D
Description of ~f you are filling in this fonn by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal:
Existinq Use:
# of Lots/Parcels:
Prospective
Applicant: .
Lot/Parcel Size:
sf I
du/acre
Date:
Signature
Print
. -,
- ,
.
Case No.:
IAPPlication Fee: $
ITOTAL FEES:
ION 2oo&-D003b Date: 10/7 J08
ITechnical Fee: $0
62/00
61J Cf)
Reviewed bV:~'
Ipostaqe Fee: $0 .
PROJECT NUMBER:
P~1 ;Z
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
1 of 3
.,
"
Development Issues Meeting Process
l
The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss
his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can
be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development
Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development
conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision
and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or
the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of knowndevelopment
opportunities and constraints. The status may changeover time as development conditions or
standards change. ....
"J' .
'.
1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application
.. The application must conform to the 'Development Issues Meeting Submittal
Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet.
, .:'~: .I :'i :"'J J"
. Development issues meetings are' conducted every ThurSday.
.We strive to conouct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of
receiving the application.
, ~ The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant s~aff in"preparation for the
'f. t If-. .... ... ~."' . .. <'" ,~-- '.~ J. - .
, ., I 'meetin'g: I . '. ',', ;'... l .:".' J
;:,: to'. ~ :.:' ., \' , " ~. _~\.: (:'2 ", ~: i "('. ,. .
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues 'Meeting ,",
, " . '".' .' ~ .... , ':\' ',. '- '." -- . ' , ,
.. The applicant ~nd 'any design' team: shduld -iittehdth'e d~\iel'ripfnen't\issues meeting.
. The meeting is scheduled for one hour.
. Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the
submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be
discussed.
. The meeting is informal and the City will. issue no staff report.
.,<1\,,',
'.\....: "
,
-' .
(')\
.
.
. ,t. ,~"
, "
,:'\
, ' .
. . \
~, 1 .,\--i
'.1",
-, ~. i,
J _~. ';'.
r'
1 .r..
,..r ~
j,J
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
2 of 3
Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist
-,\
~ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
time of complete application submittal.
~ Development Issues Meeting Application Form
~ Five (5) Questions -list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer
during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five
questions.
~ Ten (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to
review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on
the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible
given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate
with the level of detail provided in the application.
Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in
the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions &
Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal RequIrements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review
Submittal Requirements.
~ Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17"
~ Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and
related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100'
~ North arrow
~ Date of preparation
~ Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number
~ Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area
~ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points
~ On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain
lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained
~ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces
DIMs Related to Land Divisions
o Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots
~ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets
DIMs Related to Site Plan Review
o
Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area),
setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height
Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways,
sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces '. Date Received: .
Parking and circulation plan
o
~
OCT - 7 2008
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Marl<arlan
Original Submittal
''>t3
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
October 3, 2008
JOB NO.: 0428
TO: City of Springfield
Development Services Dept.
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
ATTN: Dayette Kelly
RE: LOS Springfield - New Legacy
Springfield, Oregon
WE TRANSMIT
I2J Attached
o Copy of letter
o Shop drawings
o Change order
o Under separate cover via
o Prints
I2J Plans
o Samples
o Specifications
I COPIES' DATE
11
11
11
11
110
I
. NO.
. DESCRIPTION
Check # 14599 totalinq $521.00 for Development Issues Meetinq
Development Issues Meetinq (DIM) application
Questions for staff
Exhibit A
Full size sets of drawinqs - sheets G1.0. CO.1. CO.2, C2.1, L 1.1, L 1.2,
L13, L1A, AU, A2.1, A2.2, E1.0
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW
o For Approval
I2J For Your Use
o Approved As Submitted.
o Approved As Noted
o Retumed For'Corrections
o Resubmit Copies For Approval
o Submit Copies For Distribution
o Return Corrected Plans
o As Requested
o For Bids Due
o For Review And Comment
o Prints Retumed After Loan To Us
REMARKS
Date Received:
Kelly,
Please find enclosed our submittal for Development Issues Meeting (DIM).
OCT - 7 2008
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call.
Original Submittal
Thanks.
Copy To:
Signed by: ~ ~~~~..1lR.
Title: Project Architect
McSwain & Woods, AlA. PO Box 577 . Coos Bay, OR 97420.541.269.0618. FAX 541-267-4225. mcsnwds@ucinet.com
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
541-726-3759 Phone
y of Springfield Official Receipt
uevelopment Services Department
Public Works Department
RECEIPT #:
3200800000000000691
Date: 10/07/2008
I :47:38PM
Job/Journal Number
ZON2008-00036
Description
CTY Development Issues Mtg
Payments:
Type of Payment
Check
Paid By
MCSW AIN & WOODS
Item Total:
Check Number Authorization
Received By Batch Number Number How Received
Amount Due
521.00
$521.00
Amount Paid
ddk
14599
In Person
Payment Total:
$521.00
$521.00
Date Received:
OCT - 7 2008
Original Submittal
cRcccintl
Page t of I
10/7/2008
~i
. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Springfield Oregon Stake
Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist
Five (5) Questions
1. Are there any overall impediments foreseen by the City of Springfield to
the approval of the LDS Church development shown on the submitted
drawings?
2. Are the utilities proposed by Marcola Meadows development team
generally approvable in the configuration presented by that developer to
the City of Springfield?
3. What is the process and time frame anticipated by the City of Springfield
for the reviewing and approval of our anticipated amendment to the
Marcola Meadows Master Plan?
4. What is the process and time frame for approval of the Discretionary Use
for the LDS Church Development, and is it sub~equent to or concurrent
with the Master Plan amendment process?
5. What is the anticipated time frame for approval of construction drawings
for the Marcola Meadows development team designed site utilities serving
the LDS Church site? Have the Marcola M~adows developers indicated
their time line to serve this site to the City of Springfield?
Date Received:
OCT - 7 2008
Original Submittp'1
,.1
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Springfield Oregon Stake
EXHIBIT A
New 24,320 sJ. single story church building with 68'-0" total height steeple, free
standing pavilion and 300 parking spaces.
Date Received:
OCT - 7 2008
Original Submittal