HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence PLANNER 4/28/2006 (3)
~.,_1 .
h:
_I~ki
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477.
(541) 726-3753
FAX (541) 726-3689
www.ci.springfield.or.us
August 16,2006
Mr. David Spies
Oregon IndustIial Lumber.Products
P.O. Box 1442
SpIingfield, OR 97477 '.
Mr. Chris Scott
Keating EngineeIing
. 188 West B Street, Bldg. P .
. Springfield, OR 9.7477
Re: Final Site Plan Submittal
DRC2006-00031' .
3950 MarcolaRoad, SpIingfield, OR.
A Final Site Plan Submittal was received by the City of Splingtleld on July 28, 2006 and'
a revision to that plan was received on August 9, 2006. The following items regarding
tbesubmittal were noted and will need to be modified on the plan or addressed:
.1. -There 'are differences bety,'een the Tentative Plan and the Fin:;tl Plan in the
following' calculations:
New Impervious Surfaces: .
Roofs with no HV AC: Tentative - 5,080 sf, Final - 8,000 sf
(new building addition is 60 X 84 = 5,040sf) .
Stonmvater Pretreatment Swale: Tentative - 5,200 sf, Final - 4,500 sf
2. Item four in tbe response letter submitted wilhtheFinal Site Plan discussed a
copy of a 2005 letter of intent fron'! Weyerhae~ser.: This letter does notsatisfy
conditiontive of the Notice of Decision. WIittenpennission from Weyerhaeuser
must be submitted giving their authoIization for this plan and these particular .
improvements to be installed on their property or evidence must be submi tted
(such as a deed) tbat 9regon IndustIial Lumber Products is in the exclusive
ownersbip of the property. A SeIia] Property Line Adjustment was submitted on
August 7, 20Q6. After tbe Property Line Adjustment is reviewed, approved and
the Final Survey is recorded there shall be a recorded deed showing Oreg n
IndustIial Lumber Products as the owner of the property on which the
improvements are to take place. Date Received:
Planner: LM
J.','
Ii
3. The revised plan submitted August ,9, 2006 incorPorates the surVey work done by
Ford & Associates and shows the proposed new canopy structure extending over
the property line of tax lot 3500 to lot 330], which is also owned by Oregon
Industrial Lumber. Per Springfield DevelopmentCod~ 33.030(2), a recorded
deed restriction is required when a building is to be.placed' over a property line of .
two parcels. Enclosed is a standard fonn for this type of deed restriction.
4, Check the notes on pages C2.l and,AI.O - number of employees on largest shift
35 or 40'1 Check paragraph,on page AI.O stating paving needs to be provided for
50 spaces, 65 shown? Next paragraph states 3 handicap spaces required? . . .
Please gi ve n1e a call if you have any questions.regarding these comrnents.
~"~y~~
Liz Miller
Plmmer 1
(541) 726-230\
,
. Date ~eceived:~~O .
Planner: LM .
COVENANT
, (Please Print)
BEING THE RECORD OWNER(S) of all of the following described property iocated in the City of,
Springfield, or its urbanizable area, in the County:of Lan"e, State of Oregon: '
See Attachment A
I '
I IN CONSIDERATION FOR the issuance of a B'uilding Permit by the City of Springfield which allow~
I the' owner(s)to construct a structure, over the "common property line of two or more abutting lots;
"I' record owner(s) do hereby make the following ,covenants (for the good and safety of the public, in
compliance with the Springfield Development' Code and the building reguiations of, the City of
I Springfield), covering the above described real property, specifying that this' covenant shall constitute
'a limitation to run with the land and shall be binding on all persons claiming under them, and that the
:' covenants shall be for the be'nefit of present andfuture owners ,of said real property,
I ' ' ,
I BE IT,HEREAFTER KNOWN and agreed that: I,
1. The land described in Attachment A which includes 2 or more lots, must either hereafter be sold
together without separation of the lots or p'ortions thereof as a single unit of land so long as the
structure is construCted over the common property,line(s) of the abutting lots; or '
2. ,Prior to the sale of the iots individually, the ~tructure shall be removed, and a finding' made by the
City that there is no violation of any appiicable setback regulations appiicable at the time,of sale. I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ,the undersigned have cau,sed this instrument to be executed this '
,
day of
'..20_.
Owner
Owner'
I STATE OF OREGON)
) ss.
County of Lane )
ON THIS day of
Public, the within named
, 20~. personally appeared before me, a Notary
,I
1 acknowledged the foregoing to be their voiuntary act and'deed. ,
,WITNESS my hand,and seal this day and year last written above,
I ' ,
I
II Notary Public for Oregon
I My Commission Expires: - ,
IA copy of this recorded document must be returned to the City of Springfield, Development
Services Department, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR 97477. de<;d rest',h~,_1
, Date Received:~1 Ol.P
Planner: LM '