Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance CMO 3/17/2008 ORDINANCE NO. Date Received: Planner: BJ (Special) 0,11.t!l) .-:-; "',' 6218 AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF FOURSQUARE GOSPEL, LOCATED IN NORTH SPRINGFIELD, NORTH OF HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, EAST OF 5TH STREET, WEST OF 7\11 STREET AND INVOLVING APPROXIMATELY 4.13 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAXS LOT 12600 AND 12700, T17S R03W S23 MAP 34 AND OTHERWISE KNOWN AS 600 HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, SPRINGFIELD; HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT. . WHEREAS, certain real property described below was annexed to the City of Springfield by order of Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission under Boundary Commission Number File EC SP 08-14, effective m/08, as recommended in City Planning File No. LRP2006- 00030 and supported by City Council Resolution No. 07-59 (and further described in Exhibit A & B), and WHEREAS, the property to be withdrawn is located within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District, and WHEREAS, the City of Springfield Common Council held a public hearing and first reading in the Springfield City Council Chambers on March 10, 2008, and a second reading' and adoption on March 17, 2008, in accordance with ORS 222.524, for the purpose of hearing any objections to the withdrawal of the property from the public service district mentioned and there having been no objections raised. NOW THEf'{EFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby detennine that the real property described should be in the best interest of the City of Springfield withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, insofar as the property is located therein. Section 2: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby detennine that the following described real property within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District is and shall be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, said property being described as follows: Township 17South, Range 03West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax Lots 12600, and 12700, and commonly known as 600 Hayden Bridge Road in Springfield; as more particularly described in Exhibit B of this ordinance, Boundary Commission File Number EC SP 08-14. ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 17h day of March 2008, by a vote of 5' for and 0 against. APPROVED by the Mayor of the ~SPringfield'this ~ay of March 2008. < \~~Oc/ -M~or , r ATTEST: ~~ City R#>rder . ~ r 1-. .' ~~,~->_\:.~-~~- :2- ) :2.,% I o~_.. ' ...j . - t/. Date Received: "1, /1. ~ i Planner: BJ. ORDINANCE NO. --6..2..1 R (Special) AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF FOURSQUARE GOSPEL, LOCATED IN NORTH SPRINGFIELD, NORTH OF HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, EAST OF 5lli STREET, WEST OF 7th STREET AND INVOLVING APPROXIMATELY 4.13 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAXS LOT 12600 AND 12700, T17S R03W S23 MAP 34 AND OTHERWISE KNOWN AS 600 HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, SPRINGFIELD; HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT. . . WHEREAS, certain,real property described below was annexed to the City of Springfield by order of Lane County Local Govemment Boundary Commission under Boundary Commission Number File EC SP 0El-'14, effective 217/08, as recommende~ in City Planning File No. LRP2006- 00030 and supported by City Council Resolution No. 07-59 (and further described in Exhibit A & B), and WHEREAS, the property to be withdrawn is located within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District, and WHEREAS, the City of Springfield Common Council held a public hearing and first reading in the Springfield City Council Chambers on March 10, 2008, and a second reading and adoption on March 17, 2008, in accordance with ORS 222.524, for the purpose of hearing any objections to the withdrawal of the property from the public service district mentioned and there having been no objections raised. NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the real property described should be in the best interest of the City of Springfield withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, insofar as the property is located therein. Section 2: The Common Council of the citY of Springfield does hereby determine that the following described real property within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District is and shall be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, said property being described as follows: Township 17South, Range 03West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax Lots 12600, and 12700, and commonly known as 600 Hayden Bridge Road in Springfield; as more particularly . described in Exhibit B of this ordinance, Boundary Commission File Number EC SP 0El-'14. ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 17" day of March 2008, by a vote of 5 for and 0 against. ' '. APPROVED by the Mayor of t~e ~'~pringfield this rlay of March 2008. ~\.Jr)~./p - MrYor r ArrEST: tlru-t~ City "R#>rder ,".!" ,,;." ,', ~.;..>~_~_ 's~_,~ - ?-,) :z.% l oL.___ , :' "'.. . ~ ; I _ ~ .,.. . .,. - . Blackstone 51. -- \ .- I I I I , Royal Dene pari< ail III I : , CD ~ ~ BI'~'M~ l ' -_. F.~.~.'~':.~~. ,,,,' ':f::~'''''.~~'.'''~'s.'i.' , ~~\&";;. :~\f,*\& ...... ~~"~~~~~:K . .1' ~~~-~\.~ ,.~ :'.," ' ~""'''~':'.'''':~,:\,~,,:..,,;~~'So:.'' '. .., ~','~\""'~"""w" '", '. . I.}~~~".,~,,"i,,~)~'~~:i', I . ~~~:'*:~~"''''~ ::;': ~~'~""'~\'\!1~~~ ' ' t~~:~~~'~~~"~'i'~'~"<"~' r-~~~,""~""""'" '.,,~~~,'~~ m~:; " ':--..:"'~,\' -~, ~:" "-~' ~.'~,,' ,,," .~~~ ~~"~\:'~'W';'.."):~.'~"'_. - t"~~~.A:;~~~~~i'~ ""..."',~~, ~~~''\~~~ ~~Z~ ~~''\~ ~~"~",~::~,:~::;;~ 01 1\~~~'""~'<~~'," '~":;":" ""'~ '5. ...,."'.."'..,..,....",.:;,""'" "~.'~'!.~" s -,~~,,~~~~:,\~::,\\\\,':\'\).'\,;\~ ,"'" "~.: is. i~'\~\~~\\ . Hayden Bridge Way J ail ~I " UlI I I Date Receiver!' ? 11. 06 . Planner: BJ EXHIBIT A -~1 \.).." J!.AJ:uJ:>u A I ---....... ~~ '&5 -e Q.~ .,0 , , '. '., --- ., Rciyaldel Lane ':-': ' I " ~,..: . ".# , .. \ \ :" "; ':: 1 River Kn~1I Wa~ ..j- I~ .;"r I"E . ~'I o -c .0 r ai I!! L ii3 Tn ~ I I . NoIlol<lJlo .:! li!~. ~ :!! _ e en ,&. 5 i .... ., .,....,.>... .,. '..", 'L: Legal Description Beginning at an iron pipe seti90 feet West and 600 feet North of a point 2,823.48 feet (42.78 chains) South of the Northeast comer of the Jacob Halstead Donation Land Claim No. 47, NotificatIon No. 3810, in Section 23, . r ownship 17 South," Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, Lane County, Oregon; !hence South 0 I. 0 I' 15" East 90 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 89. 53' West 31.5 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 00. 01' 15" East 150.50 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 89.53' East 127.59 feet to a point on the West line of the William Spencer Donation Land Claim Number 50 that is marked by an iron'pipe; thence South 00.13' 30" West 319.50 feet along last said West line to a point on the north margin of Hayden Bridge Way as said margin is offset 40.00 feet northerly by perpendicular measurement from the centerline of said rOOd; thence along said north margin of . Hayden Bridge Way, North 89. 53' West 369.77 feet, more or less, to the Southeast comer of Lot 2, Block 6 of "Royal Delle", as platted and recorded in Book 29 at Page 21 in the Plat Records of Lane County, State of Oregon; thence North 00. 01 '15" West along the East line of said Block 6 and its Northerly extension 560 feet to an iron pipe; and thence South 89" 53' East 275 feet returning to the point of beginning and containing 4.13 acres more or less. LANE C'OUNIT LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION 99 East Broadway Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401-3111 (541) 682-4425 FAX (541) 682-2635 . .. '. -oregon February 13,2008 Ms, Amy Sowa, Recorder City of Springfield 225 5th Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 Dear Ms. Sowa: Date Received' 3 116 ~ Planner: BJ EXHIBIT B - P1 The enclosed final order has been enacted by the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission and is forwarded in conformance with ORS 199.505. ' Filial Order 1332 (C SP 08 - 14) annexing territory to the City of Springfield (International Church of Foursquare Gospel) Please acknowledge receipt of this final order. Sincerely, C?~;;{.j~ Paula L Taylor . Executive Officer Enclosures cc: International Church of Foutsquare ,Gospel Rainbow Water and Fire District Willamalane Park and Recreation District LCBC:LCOG: L:IJJClFOLV'JN.OOSICSP0814 FOLDOC Las, Sav<d: F,bTUllry II. 2008 R . d' -3 ("'7. 0 ~ Date ecelve. . , , Planner: BJ LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION EXH I BIT B - . P2 . ':" . FINAL ORDER 1332 Approved: February 7, 2008 Effective: February 7,2008 ( File C SP 08 -14 ( In the Matter of Annexing Territory ( To the City of Springfield - Legal Description Attached as Exhibit A - WHEREAS, Resolution 07-59 by the City of Springfield was filed.on December 31, 2oo7-in accordance with ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A)-for annexation of territory to the City of Springfield, described in attached Exhibit A and shown on attached map Exhibit B; and, WHEREAS, the commission duly published notice of the public hearing in accordance with ORS 199.463 and in accordance with the rules of the commission and ORS 199.452(1), conducted a public hearing on February 7, 2008; and, WHEREAS, on the basis of the study of the proposal, which considered economic, demographic, and sociological trends and physical development of the land including the applicable comprehensive plan, and of the public hearing, the commission approved the I"VI'Vsal and made the findings and reasons attached as Exhibit C. NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED: That the area described be a part of the City of Springfield. ORDERED BY THE LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION TIllS 7rh DAY OF FEBRUARY 2008. ClaY-~!~ ~~;- 2-10..../0/7 . . Date NOTE: The subject territory is within the Rainbow Water and Frre District and will remain in the district until withdrawn through separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS ' 222. In accordance with ORS 199.5 JO(2)(c), the territory, is hereby.a pari of the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District and WilJamalane Park and Recreation District. pI: LeSC: L "BC\FOL\PH\lOlJlN:SP08/4 FO.DOC Last Saved: Fl!.bruary 7. 2008 EXHIBIT B - P3 EXHIBIT A Date F<Elceived: 1; (1.~ b Planner: BJ Beg at an iron pipe set 90.00 ft W and ~oo.oo ft N of a pt 2,823.48 ft (42.78 ch) S of the NE cor of the Jacob Halstead DLC No:47, Notification No. 3810, S23 Tl7S R03W WM, Lane County, Oregon; th SooOOI' l5"E 90.00 ft to an iron pipe; th N89053'W 31..50 ft to an iron pipe; th SooOOI' l5"E 150.50 ft to an iron pipe; th S89053'E 127.59 ft to a pt on the W Ii of the Wiliiam Sp,encerDLC No. 50 that is marked by an iron pipe; th Sooo13'30"W 319.50 ft alg sd W Ii to a pt on the N mar of Hayden Bridge Way, sd mar is . offset 40.00 ft Nly by perpendicular measurement fr the clJi of sd I'd; th algsd N mar N89053"W 369.77 ft mil to the SE cor Lot 2, Block 6 of Royal Delle, as platted and recorded in Bk 29 Pg 21 LCOPR, Lane County, Oregon; th NOooOl :15"Walg the E Ii ofsd Block 6 ,~d its Nly extension 560.00 ft to an iron pipe; th S89053'E 275.00 ft to the POB, all in Lane County, Oregon. LCBC:LCOG: L'IBClJ..EGAL'\2OO1!\CSP0814 LGLooc Uu,Sa~d: F~br1lQryJJ. 2008 Final Oider 1332 C SP 08 - 14 Page 1 of I Date Received" 1;, (~ . 0 b Planner: BJ EXHffiIT B EXHIBIT B - P4 Blackstone Sl --- - , Gl ".- e!1 I ;'. I ~I . Royal I I DeBe Parle I II .1 .1 I I ~ , Final Order 1332 C SP 08 -14 Page I of I EXHIBIT B - P5 . f,' " EXHIBIT C Date Received: Planner: BJ . 3./1d Findiill!s: I. This proposal was initiated with the boundary commission by the City of Springfield after receiving consents from the property owner on December 31, 2007, in accordance with ORS I 99.490(2)(a)(B). The proposal was: found to be a valid filing under OAR 191-006. .. 2. The proposed annexation, as submitted, included two tax lots (Tl7S R03W S23 Map 34 tax lots 12600 and 12700) comprising approximately 4.13 acres and was owned by the International Church of Foursquare Gospel. Th<;annexation area was developed with a church facility and was not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. . :,' 3.' The land use designation for the annexation area was low-density residential in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan). 4. The annexation area was zoned LDRIUF. low-density residential with urbanizing fringe, in Lane County. After the annexation effective date, the property was rezoned LDR consistent with the land use designation. . Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the effects of the-boundary change on other U/1;its of government. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and 199.410(3)(c) 5. The boundary commission held a public hearing on February .7, 2008. Notice of the ,public hearing was given in accordance with ORS 199 provisions. All interested parties were given a reasonable opportunity to be heard. 6. After annexation to -Springfield, the annexation area would be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water and Fire District. There would be some financial impact on the district because it derives its water revenue from user fees and the annexation area was 'developed with a church. The annexation area, would be withdrawn from the district through separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. On behalf of the City of Spriniif1eld, the Springfield, Utility Board provided service directly to the annexation area. ' 7. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed automatically to the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District in accordance with ORS 199.510(2)( c). 8. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area .was annexed automatically to the Willamalane Parks and Recreation District in accordance with ORS 199.51O(2)(c). 9. This request was consistent with this standard. Final Order 1332 CSP08-l4 Page I of3 EXHIBIT B -' P6 , I Date Received' 3./7 d X .~ " Planner: BJ Con,sider the. orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best meet the needs of lAne County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long- range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a) and (e) 10. ,Annexation to the City of Springfield was identified in the acknowledged Metro Plan as the preferred method for providing key urban facilities and services to the area within Springfield's portion of the urban growth'boundary. I J. Annexation to an existing city was the ll)ethodJor extending urban facilities and services to urbanizable land in the, boundary commission's policy administrative rule, implementip.g policies (I). (2), (5), and (7). 12. The, proposed annexation was the means of boundary change outlined in the Metro Plan and the boundary commission administrative' rules for ultimately providing urban facilities and services to this tenitory. Annexation of tax lotted 1" vp",~)' fulfilled the Metro Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary. 13. The p,vpvsed annexation met the criteria for noncontiguous annexations in the boundary commission law and the Metro Plan. 14. This request was consistent with boundary commission policies and this standard. Make boundary commission determinations which are consistent with acknowledged local comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate qualiJy '(l1Jd quantity of public services required in the comprehensive plan to meet eristing and future 'growth. For majorbounilary changes, there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financially viable. ORS i99.410(1)(d), 199.41.0(3)(b), and (d) 15. The annexation area was within the urban growth boundary of the acknowledged Metro ,Plan [Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) action in 1982 and as subsequently.amended]. ,Annexation of.tax lotted property assisted in fulfilling the Metro' Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary. 16. The Metro Plan recognized' annexation to the City of Springfield as the highest priority for extending the minimum level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas. 17. ,The proposed use (church) was consistent with the policies in the Metro Plan requiring. urban levels of development within the urban growth boundary. 18. The City of Springfield indicated that the required services outlined in Metro Plan policy #8, page II-C-4 and defined on,page V-3, were either available or can be provided in a timely manner. Final Order 1332 CSP08-l4 Page 2 of 3 EXHIBIT B - P7 19. This request was consistent with this standard. _ Date Received: ., (1.~ f, Planner: BJ Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposal ORS 199.410(3)(d) and 199.462(1) 20. The annexation proposal was consistent with the Metro Plan, as it was an incremental step in implementing the long-range plan for this area. The urban growth boundary, land uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future' needs of the metropolitan community. The proposed use was consistent with the long-range plan for the area and fulfilled the growth policies in the Metro Plan and in Oregon law. 21. This request was consistent with this standard. Reasons: I. The proposal was supported by the City of Springfield and the property owner. 2. The proposal was consistent with the LCDC acknowledged Metro Plan. 3. The serVices required in the Metro Plan, were either available or could be provided in a timely manner when needed. 4. The proposal was consistent with past boundary commission actions supporting annexation to the City of Springfield. . 5. The proposal was consistent with boundary commission administrative rule policies. . LCBC:LCOG: I.:\BClFOLIEXC\2OO11\CSPOB14 EXC.OOC lAst Saved: Feb11lary II. 2008 '. Fmal Order 1332 CSP08-14 Page 3 of 3 Date Received' Planner: BJ / 3. r'L 06 EXHIBIT B..., P8 STAFF NOTES LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION (99 Easo Broadway. Soite 400. Eugene, OR 97401-311l) Eogax: City HaD Cooncil Chamber m Pearls..... Eugene February 7. 2008 7:00p.m. Annexation of rerritorv to the Citv of Sorinl!fieJd (]nternational Church of Foursouare Gosnej) N.A. BC File C SP 08 - 14 Initiated by Resolution 07-59 by the City of Springfield with consents from p,vp"'''i owners Action under ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A) of the boundary commission law Received December 31, 2007 Action to be taken by March 30, 2008 Descriotion The arii1exation area includes two tax lots located in east Springfield, north of Hayden Bridge Way, east of 5th Street, south of Blackstone Street, and west of Old Orchard Lane F.vY""i owner!: International Church of Foursquare GospeJ'(600 Haydcn BridgcWay. Spriog!icJd) Tax lots: 12600 and 12700, Tl7S R03W S23 Map 34 . Acres: :t 4.13 Estimate of existing population: 0 Existing land use: Church and related facilities, vacant Existing zoning in Lane County: lDR\UF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay Applicable comprehensive plan: Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (acknowledged in August 1982 and has been subsequently amended) Existing public services to the p,uP""1- Police (Oregon State Police, Lane County Sheriff), 'schools (Springfield School District 19), roads (Lane County, City of Springfield); fire (Rainbow Water and Fire District contracting with the City of Springfield), water (Rainbow Water and Fire District) Reason for Annexation The p,uy"'uY owner requested aimexation to prepare the site for additional church facility development. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan requires p' up'" Jes to annex in order to receive urban services. Notice As required by ORS 199.463(1), notice of a .public hearing must be published in a newspaper of general circulation not more than 25 days nor less than 15 days before the J . ' :'l~I'-'J owner means the owner of the bile ofreall'ovl'~"i or the contract purchaser ofreall"~I'_'J as shown on the last available complete assessment roll. ORS 199 .415( 13) LCLGBC Staff Notes (C sp 08 - 14) - February 7, 2008 Page IV-A-l ., EXHIBIT B - P9 Dale Received: ?,11M; Planner: BJ , hearing. In this ca~ notice of the public' hearing was advertised in The Eugene Register-Guard on 17, 2008. A second notice may be published in a newspaper of general circulation or notice of the hearing may be mailed to each owner of land in the affected territory,2 as described in the petition,3 not more than 15 days before the hearing. In this case, notice of the hearing was sent to the affected property owner (T7m Baskin' and Lynda Gupton, on behalf of the International Church of Foursquare Gospe~ owner of the property proposed for annexation) on January 25, 2008. The final notice required i?Y the boundary commission law is the, posting of a notice of the public hearing in ..the affected city, district, or territory at least 15 days before the hearing. In this case, notice of the public hearing was posted in the area of the annexation, at the Springfield dty ha/~ and at the /..,3ne County courthouse on January 23, 2008. In conformance with OAR 191-005-0065(3), these staff notes are incorporated as part of the record of the boundary commission public hearing of FebT]lary 7, 2008. ni.is annexation proposal was filed with the boundary ~oinmission in accordance with ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A), iIiitiated by Resolution No. 07-59 by the City of Springfield. Prior to initiating the annexation, the City of Springfield received written consent from the property owner (Tim Baskin and Lynda Gupton, on behalf of the International Church of Foursquare Gospel) requesting annexation.' At the time the annexation was iIiitiated by the city, there .were no electors4 register~d within the annexation area. The statutory provision to receive consents from owners is met. The p.upvsal w~filed with the boundary commission on December 31, 2007, and boundary . commission action must occur by March 24, 2008 (90-day statutory time frame). If the annexation is approved by the boundary commission on February 7, 2009, it will become effective upon passage of th~ final order. ", The poupused annexation area includes two tax lots (refer 1.0 Maps No. N-A-l and N-A-2). The annexation area is currently developed with one church oil site. Annexation to Springfield will . . . a allow additional church development 'to occur. . . , The annexation area is not .contiguous to the'main bOdy of the City of Springfield. It is adjacent to other noncontiguous' portions of the city. The urban growth boundary (UGB) is located approximately 600 feet north of the', annexation area. The annexation area is designated low- density residential in the Eugene-Springfield Mtuul'ulitanlArea General Plan (Metro Plan) and is zoned lDR\UF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay, in Lane County. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the UF overlay will' automatically be removed and the annexed properties will be zoned consisterit with the plan c!esignation. , Affected territory me""s the territory descnbed in the petition. ORS 199.415(3) ~ Petition means the documents required to initiate a boundary change and includes, but is not limited to, an initiating document, legal description, cadastral maps"and inf.mnation form. ORS 199.415(14), ORS 199.490(4), and OAR . 191-006-0000(3) , · Elector'means an individ~a1 registered to vote at an address within th~ affected territory., ORS 199.490(1) and (5) and ORS 199505 . LCLGBC Staff Notes (CSP08-14) - February 7, 2008 Page N-A-2 . ~:. '.~.: . ,- .'~.. - ;:. Date Received: Planner: BJ 3,nA_ EXHIBIT B -.P10 'The annexation was initiated by the City of Springfield on December 3, 2007. An Annexation Agreement outlining the agreements between the city and the owner for the provision' of urban services and financing responsibility has been fully executed for the annexation area. BOUNDARY COMMISSiON REFERRALS Boundary commission referrals were sent to the Lane Comity Land Management Division, Lane County Environmental Health Division, Lane County Board cif Commissioners, and Rainbow' Water and Fire District. ' No referral responses were received as of January 30, 2008. BOUNDARY COMMISSION STANDARDS ~ STAFF ANALYSIS In this section of the staff notes, each applicable boundary commission standard is addressed. These standards are derived from ORS 199 and the boupdary commission's policy administrative rule (OAR 191, Division 30). '. ) Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questf.ons. Consider the effects of the' boundary change on other units of governments. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and 199.410(3)(c) This annexation request was filed in accordance with provisions in ORS 199 and was determined , to be a valid filing in accordance with "OAR 19l~OO6 (adopted administrative rule on boundary commission filing requirements). The item was ,placed on the boundary commission's agenda for February 7, 2008. Notice of the boundary commission's public hearing has been published in accordance with Oregon law. Any person may attend and will be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The proposed arinexation area is within the Rainbow Water and FIre District.. The fire district contracts with the City of Springfield for fire services withiIi itS boundaries. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the annexation area will be automatically withdrawn from the fire district in accordance with ORS 199.510(2)(a) and the city will provide fire services directly to the annexed pJ.vJ-'~.ILi. . The Metro Plari identifies the city as the ultimate provider of urban services within the UGB. Policy #18, page II-C.{i, in the Metro Plan recogllizes th'at as annexations to the city occur, existing special service districts within the UGB will be dissolved. The continued annexation of p,vp,""ies to the City of Springfield is consistent with the Metro Plan, which likely will result in the elimination of several special districts within the urbanizable area. Upon annexation, the area will be annexed automatically into the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District tORS 1993JO(2)(c)). This special district was formed to provide the financing for the regional wastewater treatment plant serving wastewater users within the cities of Eugene arid Springfield and other users within the urbanizable area. LCLGBC Staff.Notes (C SP 08 -14) - February 7; 2008 Page NcA-3 EXHIBIT B - Pll Date Received' :],(1.06 Planner: BJ Upon annexation, the area will be annexed automatically into the Willamalane Park and Recreation District, which provides park and recreation facilities and services to territory within the City of Springfield.' This request is consistent with this standard. , ' Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best 'meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long- range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a) and (e) The area in this annexation proposal is located within the acknowledged UGB of the Metro Plan. rerritory within the UGB ultimately will be within the City of Springfield. Springfield is the unit of government identified in the Metro Plan to provide urban services to territory in this area. The proposed annexation is not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. Noncontiguous annexations are allowed by state annexation law and provided for in the Metro Plan if certain criteria are met. The Metro Plan policy for noncontiguous annexation (policy #12, page ll-C-5) requires that noncontiguous annexations meet the foIlowing.criteria: a: ' The area to be annexed will be provided urban service(s), which is (are} desired iIriInediately by the residents/property owners. b. The area to be annexed can be serviced (with a minimum level of services, as directed in the Metro Plan) in a timely and cost-efficient manner and is a logical extension of the city's service delivery system. c. The annexation p' vpvsal is accompanied by support within the area p' vpv~ed for annexation from the owners of at least half the land area' in the affected'territory. TIlls annexation' is consistent with boundary commission administrative rule implementing policies (I), (2), (5), and (7) which recognize annexation to an existing city as the preferred method of servicing urbanizable Janet (I) This policy recognizes cities as the logical providerS of urban levels of service within urban growth boundaries when consistent with the comprehensive plan. (2) TIlls policy expresses the commission's preference for providing urban services 'through annexation to a city in order. to provide urban services to urbanizable lands. (5) TIlls policy encourages the provision of urban levels of service within 'urban growth boundaries. LCLGBC Staff Notes (C SP08- 14) - February 7, 2008 Page N -A-4 ...., Date Received: 3, /1. 0 g , Planner: BJ EXHIBIT B - P12 !,;~> - . (7) 1bis policy expresses the commission's preference for annexation to an existing city' over all other alternatives as a means of extending services to urbanizable lands. Implementing policy (3) recognizes that in .order ta meet the long-term .objectives of annexing aut to an acknawledged urban growth boundary, shart-termbaundaries are created which are logical within the context .of the future service boundai-y. In the lang term territory within this geagraphic area will be annexed io Springfield. Annexatian to the city fulfIlls the policies adopted in the Metro Plan .of annexing out to the urban growth baundary. 1bis prapasal ta annex territary ta the City .of Springfield is cansistent with boundary cammissian palicies and this standard. Make boundary commission detenninations. which are consistent with acknowledged local . . comprehensive plans_ Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future growth. For major boundary changes, there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financially viable. ORS 199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b) and (d) The proposal is within the Metro Plan urban growth baundary. The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the Land Conservatian and Develapment Cammission (LCDC) in August 1982 and has been subsequently amended. The Metro Plan recognizes annexation as the highest priority for extending the minimum level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas (policies #8, and #10, page D-C-4) and recognizes that ultimately, all territory within the urban growth boundary will be annexed to an existing city (policy # 16, page D-C-6). The annexation area is currently designated low-density residential in the Metro Plan. If the annexation is approved, the tax lotted properties will be rezoned to a LOR, a city zoning district consistent with the plan designation. The annexation area will take advantage of urban service delivery systems that are already in place to serve this area. The following facilities and services are either available or can be extended to this annexation area. Water - The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District. The city indicates there is existing 6-inch water line located in Hayden Bridge Way. Service to new development within the annexation area can be provided by this line. Following annexation, the City of Springfield will withdraw the property from th~ Rainbow Water and Fire District in accordance with ORS 222 and the Springfield Utility Board (SUB) will provide services to the annexation area. 'An intergovernmental a&""",ent between the water district and SUB and state law will determine the orderly transition o["services and finances between the two service providers. '7 Electricitv - Springfield Utility Board (SUB) provides electric service to developed properties in this area of south Springfield. New development in the annexation area will be served by SUB. LCLGBC Staff Notes (CSP08-14) - February 7, 2008 PageN-A-5 EXHIBIT B -P13 Date Received' 3, 11~~ Planner: BJ Police services - Springfield staff indicates that police currently provide service to other properties in this general area already inside the city. After annexation, this proposal area will receive police services on an equal basis with properties -inside the city. Infill annexations and development in this area will increase the efficiency ofsen.ice delivery to this area. Fire and emetl!encv services - Fire protection is currentlY:provided to the B!llexation area by the Rainbow Water and Fire District. This special district contracts with the City of Springfield for fire services to territory within the district's boundaries. Upon lII)nexation, the annexing area will be withdrawn from the fire district and Springfield will provide fire servIces directly to the annexation area. Springfield fire stations are located near Pheasant A venue and Hayden Bridge Way, S 47'h Street and Main Street, and S 68th Stree,t and Main Street. Emergency medical transport (ambulance). services are provided on a regional basis by Eugene, Springfield, and Lane Rural Fire/Rescue to central Lane County: The annexation area will continue to receive this service consistent with the adopted ambularice service arell (ASA) plan. Mutual aid agreements have been adopted by the three regiOlial ASA providers to provide backup coverage for each other's jurisdictions. Parks and recreation- Upon annexation area to the City'of Springfield, the annexing area will also be annexed to the Willamalane Park and Recreation'District. Park and recreation services are provided to the City of Springfield by the park district. Indoor recreation facilities, suchas the Willamalane .Park Swim Center, Lively Park Swim Center, Memorial Building Community Center, and Willarnalane Adult Actjvity Center will be available to residents as new development occurs. The park district offers various after-school and other programs for children at schools and parks throughout the community." Also available ,are pathways and several categories of parks, inCluding community parks, sports parks, special use parks, and natural area parks. There is one park currently located in the vicinhy of the annexation area, Royal Delle, a 2.76-acre neighborhood park on Blackstone' Street. Other neaipy recreational opportunities inClude Harvest Landing and Page Park. Schools - Springfield School District ] 9 serves this area. Existing schools--Guy Lee elementary. Harr\lin arid Springfield high-serve this neighborhood; however, the annexation area does not contain any residential dwellings and shoult;! not generate :any additional demands on the school system. , Wastewater - Springfield staff indicated tat the existing ,church within the annexation area is not 'currently connected to the city wastewater system. There are three possible connection points for extension of wastewater service to the annexation area: an existing 6-inch line within Blackstone Street northeast of the annexation area; an 8-inch line that extends south of Blackstone Street ~oughly parallel with and about 80 feet offset from the eait I"Vj,"""j line of the annexation area; and an 8-inch line at the intersection .of Mint Meadow Way and Old Orchard Lane . . . (approximately 500 feet east of the soutjJeastern corner of the annexation area). The public wastewater lines within and extending from Blackstone Street are located within the city limits. However, extension of a wastewater line from the inters~ctioh of Mint Meadow Way and Old Lo...GBC Staff Notes (C sp 08 - 14) - February 7, 2008 Page IV-A-6 Date Received: -3. Ii. (J i Planner: BJ EXHIBIT B - P14 .-.,".'"'' ..., ,~.,;.b.. 'rc"y;.jt... . Orchard LaDe along Hayden Bridge Way would be outside the City limits until the right-of-way is anne:l:ed. Upon the annexation effective date. the area will be annexed automatically to the Lane County , , Metropolitan Wastewater Service District [ORS 199.5l0(2)(c)). Stonnwaier - ~pringfield staff indiCated that roof runoff is directed onto the site and passes into a series of catch basins within the site parking lot. From the catch basin system, stonnwater infiltrates into a drywell. There is an existing l8-inch stonnwater line adjacent to the annexation area within Hayden Bridge Way. Approval from Lane County is needed before connection to this system may occur. Any further development or redevelopment in the annexation area will require "-yY'''y,:ate stonnwater management techniques in accordance with city standards. Streets :c- The anne:l:ation area abuts Hayden Bridge Way on its south side, which is fully improved with curb and giltter, pavement, sidewaJks, and street lights. An interconnected transportation system will be required in order to provide access and a transportation system for the provision of fire and life safety services to and from the annexing 1" uY"~ Jes. Hayden Bridge Way is not located within the Springfield city limits. Solid waste management - Private finns and individuals collect and transport solid waste to the Lane County administered landfill. Communication facilities - Various providerS offer both wire and wireless communication services in the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area~ Existing providers and those entering the mar~et have the capability to provide service to future development in this area. Land use controls.- The property is within Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary. ThrOugh an intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and the City of Springfield, the city already has planning and building jurisdiction for this property. The city will continue to administer land use controls after annexation. The' minimum level of key urban facilities and services, as defined on page V ~3 of the Metro Plan, are either. immediately available or can be provided within a reasonable future time frame as needed. TIris request is consistent,with this standard. Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposal ORS 199.410(3)(d) and 199.462(1) The annexation proposal is consistent with the Metro Plan., as it is an incremental step in implementing the long-range plail for this area. The urban growth boundary, land uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the metropolitan community. The existing and proposed uses are consistent with the long-range plan for,the area ,and will fulfill the growth policies in the Metro Plan and in Oregon law. ' LCLGBC Staff Notes (C SP 08 -14) - February 7, 2008 Page N-A-7 EXHIBIT B' - P15 Date Received' 7,(1,0 g , This request is consistent with this boundary commission standard. Planner: BJ STAFF RECOMMENDATION The boundary commission staff n:commends that the proposed annexation to the City of Springfield (BC File C SP 08 - 14) be approved as submitted based on the following [mdings . ..' and reasons. The findings are organized to respond to 'boundary commission standards outlined in ORS 199, the boundary commission law. The following [mdings and reasons are based on approval of the request as submitted. If the boundary commission modifies or denies the proposal, the [mdings and reasons would need to be adjusted. . Findinl!s: I. This proposal was initiated with the boundary commission by the City of Springfield after receiving consents from the property owner on December 31, 2007, in accordance with ORS 199A90(2)(a)(B). The proposal was found to be a valid filing under OAR 191-006. 2. The proposed annexation, as submitted, included two tax lots (T17S R03W S23 Map 34 tax lots 12600 and 127(0) comprising approximately 4.13 acres and was owned by the International Church of Foursquare Gospel. The annexation area was developed with a church facility and was not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. 3. The land use designation for the annexation area was low-density residential in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan). 4. The annexation area was zoned LDRIUF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe, in Lane County. After the annexation effective date, the property was rezoned LDR consistent with the land use designation. Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jUrV>dictional questions. Consider the effects of the boundary change on other units of government. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and 199.410(3)(c) 5. The boundary commission held a public hearing on February 7, 2008. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with ORS 199 provisions. All interested parties were given'a reasonable opportunity to be heard. 6. After annexation to Springfield, the annexation area would be withdrawn from the . Rainbow Water and Fire District. There would be some financial impact on the district because it derives its water revenue from user fees and the annexation area was developed with a church. The annexation area would be withdrawn from the district through separate !,>u~.:..;.dings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. On. behalf LCLGBC Staff Notes (CSP08-14) -February 7,2008 Page N -A-8 Date Received' Planner: BJ' 811 oi EXHIBIT B - P16 of the City of Springfield, the Springfield Utility Board provided service directly to the annexation area. ' 7. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed automatically to the Lane County Metropolitan" Wastewater Service District in accordance ~th ORS 199.5l0(2)(c). 8. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed automatically to the Willamalane Parks and Recreation District in accordance with ORS 199.510(2)( c). 9. This request was consistent with this standard. Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long- range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a) and '(e) 10. Annexation to the City of Springfield was identified in the acknowledged Metro Plan as the preferred method for providing key urban facilities and services to the area within Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary. . 11. Annexation to an existing city was the method for extending urban fa"ilities and services to urbanizable land in the boundary commission's policy administrative rule, implementing policies (I), (2), (5), and (7).' 12. The I'.vpvsed annexation was the means of boundary change outlined in the Metro Plan and the boundary commission administrative 'rules for ultimately providing urban facilities and services to this territory. Annexation of tax lotted property fulfilled the Metro Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary: 13. The p.vpvsed annexation met the criteria for noncontiguous annexations in the boundary commission law and the Metro Plan. 14. This request was consistent with boundary commission policies and this standard_ Make boundary commission determinations which are consistent with acknowledged local comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future growth. For major boundary changes, there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financially viable. ORS 199.4j0(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b), and (d) 15. ,The annexation area was within the urban growth boundary of the acknowledged Metro Plan [Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) action in 1982 and as subsequently amended). Annexation of tax lotted p,vp'" 'i assisted in fulfilling the Metro Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary; LCLGBC Staff Notes (CSP08-14) -February 7, 2008 Page IV-A~9 EXH I B IT B - P17 Date Received' 3,(1.0& Planner: BJ 16. The Metro Plan recognized annexation to the City of Springfield as the highest priority for extending the minimum level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas. 17. The proposed use (church) was consistent with the policies in the Metro Plan requiring urban levels of development within the urban growth boundary. 18. The City of Springfield indicated that the required services outlined in Metro Plan policy #8, page II-C-4 and defined on page V -3, were either available or can be provided in a timely'manner. 19. This request was consistent with this standard. Consider the. comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposaL ORS 199.410(3)(d) and 199.462(1) . ' , 20. The annexation proposal was consistent with the Metro Plan, as it was an incremental step in implementing the long-range plan for this area. The urban growth boundary, land uses, and 'policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the metropolitan community. The proposed use was consistent with the long-range plan for the area and fulfilled the growth policies in the Metro Plan and in Oregon law. 21. This requ~sl was consistent with this standard. Reasons: I. The proposal was supported by the City of Springfield and the property owner. 2. The proposal was consistent with the LCDC acknowledged MetrO Plan. 3. The services required in the Metro Plan were either a,:,ailable or could be provided in a timely manner when needed. 4. The proposal was consistent with past boundary commission actions supporting annexation to the City of Springfield. 5. The I',uyu.al was consistent with boundary commis~ion administrative rule policies. pr: LCBC: L'lBm NVl/XJII\CSP0814 SN.DOC wI Saved: F~bTllary I. 2008 " . LCLGBC Staff NOleS (C'SP08- ]4) -February 7, 2008 Page N-A-1O EXHIBIT B - P18 ,..~_."c.~-._~ Date Received: 3.1"1.;.QX Planner: BJ Map No. IV-A-} Vicinity Map I' Annexation 10 Springfield (International Church of Foursquare Gospel) , , c SP 08 - ]4 A tL '~-~ I ffIllL_~~ "y. ...- Of." I'IJ~ ~,,-~"'"J,ol I ' LCLGBe Staff Notes (C sp 08 - 14) - February 7, 2008 Page IV-A-ll EXHIBIT B - P19 Date Received}~16i Planner: BJ Map No. IV -A-2 Site Map Annexation 10 Springfield (International Church of Foursquare Gospel) C ~nnQ ]4 , RcyaJ Dena 'PBiIC ~ I I I Iml 1:1 ,.U)/ f I I I , I . ~.:. '. :f.:::!..'<t'i...rj'~;;~:. ~ i",~:; ,:;~:':;,,:~) ';~r~f~( ~" "::I.' ,'.. ~'" .J" ..,.,;'Jl.'......., ~ t':'~:1 ~,;\,"'\:':/,JC~;~~'~' _ :~:9F.i:J~:'~,:i] Jl~f~I' \. , aJ l!! ii5 5 CD ~ I, . , ~~~ "'t~k\'~'~,' ""'~~~"~""~,, .,~~. ~'Io:' , :8.. . "'\\, ,\"'~ ~~.....,,",.. ,t-'W ~'" ~ :~~~~~~\~\~\:::>'.:..,~."~ i:'l~:.~~~~'~~' -:,"\ I fii ,~~'t,,,~'(;,~\~ "-' ..J i~f.''i,~...\\\'\~''',~~ ' ,"" ,~~,;"".~, ~~\\&~~ ~~~~~...~"'~'~~~'\\ ~~W:\'l""'" "\~'-~~ "''''''.-' ; ,i~.~.~o\!~~.,,\,\'iN"\"'~ _t~~~\~""".\~:\~"\~,, ~ '-~\;~~~~ ~"~~\"'~'I:x~~;.(""~ ~~~-.~~~~ , ..,~~,(~:~~W 'Hayc;ten Bridge Way . ~- .' .~ - ~-,~: ,"' . J..J -. i! J-_L.':~ 1.:.c.. J' ANNEXA nON AREA .1 Includes TLs 12600, 12700, 17-ffi-23-34 ~ Owned by the International OlUrch of Foursquare Gospel BCFile C SP08-14 .:.! ..~. ," ;~~;;!; -" Blackstone Sl -- ~ ,- ""-.-" . I.,: " I ! fI "5-' I , _ i.4.... iI4..., ~., I Cambridge Sl f LCLGBC Staff Notes (e sp 08 -14) - February 7, 2008 Page N-A-12 Date Received: ::3. ('1. a t Planner: BJ EXHIBITB - P20 .'~ J ~ '.!::/-~I :': -, ~.c)..;:~\._ RESOLUTION NO 07-59 A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CI1Y OF SPRlNGFIELD AND REQUESTING THAT THE LANE COUN1Y LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE THE ANNEXATION WHEREAS, the City received a request to annex approximately 4.13 acres into the City of Springfield on November 22, 2006, said territory being described as follows: Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax Lots 12600 and 12700 (commonly known as 600 Hayden Bridge Way, Springfield) as generally depicted and more particularly described in Exhibit A of this Resolution. . WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is within the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth Boundary, and is adjacent to the.city Limits; and, WHEREAS,'the City Council is authorized by ORS I 99.490(2)(a)(A) to initiate annexation upon receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be annexed and written consent ' from more than half of the owners of land in the territory proposed to be annexed, who also own more than half of the land in the'territory proposed to be annexed and of real property therein representing more than half of the assessed value of all real property in the territory proposed to be annexed; WHEREAS, one hundred percent of the property ownerS of the territory signed a consent to annex (Exhibit B); and, WHEREAS, there are. no registered electors in the territoiy to be annexed (Exhibit C); and, WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield Development Code 6.070; ORS 222.111 arid other . appliCable Oregon Revised Statutes to initiaie annexation when the territory in the annexation proposal can be provided with the minimum key level of urban facilities and services in an orderli and efficient manner as defined in the Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan Policy 8, Page II-B-4, and where there will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services and facilities; and, , WHEREAS, minimum level of key urban services and facilities are defined in the Eugene-Springfie,ld Metro Area GimeraI Plan, Page V-3 as sanitary sewer service, storrnwater service, solid waste management, water service, fire and emergency medical services, police protection, city-wide parks and recreation programs, electric service, land use controls, communication facilities and services, and public schools on a district-wide basis; and, . WHEREAS, the territory. proposed to be annexed can be immediately provided with a minimum level of key urban facilities and services, with the exception of City storrnwater and sanitary sewer services which are available within , public streets near the property; and, WHEREAS provision of City storrnwater and sanitary sewer services has been arranged through an Annexation Agreement that has been negotiated with City staff and the property owner, as described in Attachment 2, Case Number LRP2006-00030; and, WHEREAS, an Annexation Agreement has been proposed for execution by the City of Springfield and the property owner (International Church of the Foursquare Gospel operating as Springfield Faith Center) which will memorialize the Owner's commitment, agreement and obligation to meet the City's requirements for provision of the minimum level of key urban services and facilities as required for an affirmative City recommendation for the annexation request;. and, WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forward this resolution supporting the applicant's annexation request to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission when an Annexation Agreement is entered into by the City of Springfield and International Church of the Foursquare Gospel (Owner); EXHIBIT B - P21 . . '. J,,'llfg . NOW THEREFORE BASED ON THE FOREGOING RECITALS, THE COM:M~ik..flNBIfllF rtffi CITY OF SPRlNGFIELDDOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: ' Planner: BJ Section I: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby recommend approval of the annexation of the subject territory to the City by the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission, Lane County, Oregon, said territory being described as follows: . . Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax Lots 12600 and 12700 (commonly known as 600 Hayden Bridge Way, Springfield) as generally depicted and more particularly descnoed in Exhibit A of this Resolution. Section 2; This resolution shall take effect upon adoption by the Common Council of the City of Springfield and approval by the Mayor. . - SectioI!.1.; The City. Council recommends that the Boundary Commission approve the proposed annexation upon execution of an Annexation Agreement as descnoed in the recitals. Section 4: The City Manager is hereby authorized to sign the Final Annexation Agreement which memorializes the 'Owner's commitment, agreement and obligation.to meet the City's requirements for provision of the minimum level of key urban services and facilities. ' Section 5: The City Manager shall forward this Resolution supporting the applicant's annexation request to the Lane County Locai Government Boundary Commission. ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 3rd day of December, Z007, by a vote of 6 for and 0 against.. APPROvED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 3rd day of December, 2007. ~~ City Record(j \'b.. (/1 ___-1 ~ J ~ ~ I MayorU ATTEST: "~,,~,,I;Jr.n ? 1."~t;"lin\lED ('.~. . .,.H I.,,; i.. uT n. v A:;; i- 0 IOHr,,~ ,,},b~ ~ L~" Dr."",: ..tl..~2.i' Leo, Or-fiC[ 01' CITY ATTORNEY City of Sprhlgfield. Oregon CERTIFIED TRUE COPY ~ot>>~ T'tT.",.,..TTT9n..........., ........ n-r I:'n Blackstone 5l -- \ - I~I ILOI I I I , .- , I r I I Royal Delle Fjlrk Cambridge 5t. 10 ( Date Received: -3, /1. " & Planner: BJ .l!.AJ:UDU A I ,~ I - Gl I ~I 1 U)~ ~ , . ,', ~~~'\~'~~~~);"i' ;,,~~~~, -/::-x~ :t.\~-;;". ''''.::~'k~~~~~~ .". ~~~\~~~~. p~~,,~~:~~ . t:~:'~\\\""'~"~~"3' . "':"~"'~~'~:'~~':'\"'~~~'" ~."~'::~:~"~"\i.; f~~~~"~''\~~'\'" "S:~'\'" "'\~ '~~.\.~ .,' ~ t:\;,,,.,,,, ",'" '''':"\~'~~";;'~'''*'''\\i:~ ~""~,.." ,.,......~"'-.- ," ~~~~'" e '" ,. ''''--'~ ~ ,.,. ,. "'.~'~' " """""",,",,:0., ..'~ ",:,;:."~' ~~~~~~~~~~~,~ I~"";"~""-'''''''s~":~",,,.....~,,,,,,,,,,, ~ '~~'~'," ''.,'''''''~'''' """,,'"- '" , ,,'.,....,' "."...."*'')\\'u ~1"ii.~'*'~""\...'\''''''''~i><~'I~ Ji .~~"",'".." ",""~~,~~~, .. _.:J;:":,,,,,,,,~,,,\~~ " Ii~~"::~;'t~~_" i ,":, "," . \ "" _~.'.'~~'l'.~.,:?:;.\'.','."::t..\"'~~';-,~~',,,,,,\~~'$..:~:~ _.,'......~""'>-- . '. .........:-,.'<,- BlackStone 5l I I I I Hayden Bridge Way .1 r Cii e Liii .~ ~ , . NotlDn:ak .. J GilD & .... l! iiil~ ' 5 i' I'- '" '. i: EXHIBIT B - P22 ----. i~ '&5 h " ., .;: \ .1. -'.". . ;~. . Rciyaldellline :;; :. ) " I . ,,\ \ ' . " " ;'. ,:~~ ''''f l River Kn~1l wa~i' lD ' /j I"E . ~'I o "C .0 :1'. :': , '- :',A' -',t, .f',.:" ~, _"J:," .: . '.~. .:.,~~ " :,. Legal Description Beginning at ail iron pipe set 90 feet West and 600 feet North ofa point 2,823.48 feet (42.78 chains) South of the Northeast corner of the Jacob Halstead Donation Land Claim No. 47, Notification No. 3810, in Section 23, , Township 17 South; Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, J,ane County, Oregon; thence South 010 01' 15" East 90 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 89" 53' West 31.5 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 000 01' 15" East 150.50 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 890 53' East 127.59 feet to a point on the West line of the William Spencer Donation Land Claim Number 50 that is marked by an iron pipe; thence South 00013' 30" West 319.50 feet along last said West line to a point on the north margin of Hayden Bridge Way as said margin is offset 40.00 feet northerly by perpendicular measUrement from the centerline of said rOlid; thence along said north margin of Hayden Bridge Way, North 890 53' Wesj: 369.77 feet, more or less, to the Southeast corner of Lot 2, Block 6 of "Royal Delle", as platted and recorded in Book 29 at Page 21 in the Plat Records of Lane County, Stale of Oregon; thence North 00" 01'15" West along the East line of said Block 6 and its Northerly extension 560 feet to an iron pipe; and thence South 890 53' 'East 275 feet returning to the point of beginning and containing 4.13 acres more or less. EXHIBIT B - P23 EXHIBIT B FORM #1 Date Received: 3. /1: 0$ Planner: BJ PETITION ANNEXATiON.TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD TO: LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION We, the undersigned, constitute the oWners of at least one~ha1f of the land area of the property descnoed in the attachment marked "Exh.1oit An AND We desirl: tq be annexed to the City of Springfield. A map isattached marked "Exlnoit B,n showing the affected territory and its relationship to the present city l.4Dit boundaries. ' The annexation constitutes a minor'boundary change under the Boundar). Commission Act.;nd should th.. .fw. _ be considered by the Boundary Commission and, after study, a Final Order should he entered by the Boimdary Commission. ..., '.' . '.' . . . By ~ ~~. '[j ~\J~/J- -. !1'cretary . B}l ~ :A ---' J;yfid J. Guptqn. As!ft. - Controller . 'By Date~T"',, ~ . ?nn~ Date .Jnlv ~. 7 nn~ Date By Dati: '. MAP# 17 - ~3 -..2.. 3 - J'4 LOT# (}"t'- O(!) MAP# 17- OJ -)..3 - 31 LOT#-_)). 76D : . . With the above signature, I am v'erifying that I have the authority:to consent to the annexation on my own behalf or on behalf of my firm, agency or trust. . s EXHIBIT B - P24' Date Received: ? " 1'1. () ~ planner: BJ '. '~.":!, . 'f::.r ',,;? _ VERIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS I have caused a search to be made of the assessment and taxation records, Lane County Department of Assessment and Taxation (A&T), on 17-03-23-34-12600 and 17-03-23-34-12700. Those records reflect that the International Church of the FourSauare Gosoel are,the owners . of record of the property identified by the tax lots described on the attached sheet. . A&T is not reSponsible for subsequent deed activity' which may not yet be reflected on the A&T computerized taX roll. 'ai:eJ~~ , Lane COUIlty Department of Assessment and Taxation 11/14/07 Date I:\A TINFO\BusinessProcess\Annexations\Property Verification form.doc ,._...,^"- PETITION I.D. PETITION F()R rll ANNEXATION TO DISTRiCTS D FORMAl'ION OF DISTRICT , . .. . SIGNATURE SHEET IQ THE ~OUNTY ELECTWNS FILING OFFICE~~IS:rroCT OF' ~ ]. , ;t 14. Is. 16. 17. 18. i9. 110. r 11. 12. I]. 114. IS. ' 16. 17., 18. 19. 1- 7/6/06 I :A _____ -7/06/06 Lvnda J. Gunt:on. 1. CIRCULATOR'.S VERIFICATION . ~ THIS VERIFICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE CIRCULATOR SHEET NUMBER THIS IS A CITY I D1STRICf PETITION. SIGNERS OF THIS PAGE MUST BE REGlSTHRED VOTERS IN LANE COUNTY ONLY. C:::::;Or-- ~ "'-U~ .C',' '" \ A '~ - U . , DATElIlGNED .'DIU" YIY~ .ao. aaa. DWNE. O\\'Nlla JU!mENCI: ADDRElI.! ITREET. HUMIIJ:K It. CrTY' \\'lAP & TAX LOT PRINT NAME , 7 ~D.J,..;13 '31" l;;tf.,CO Bh 111-.... ~.2 ~-_T..., I ~ ro!><l I (' Tim J. BaRkin. ARRt:. SEe. 1210 ~. Suns~t: I;t:e; lUU Asst. (an. nR~eleR. .CA gr 026 " ..... o u :~ . o - l> U :5 .n o ,.. 1 I! ..... o (', ,~ ;' '" I. I I I I M o oS ~ !l u\,. v Q;' ll: 'il ;:) ct ~ ;;! .. il ;'1 reo !l ~~, i c. f~~' 0':' ANNEXATION TO DISTRICTS I FORMATION OF DijlTRICT PETITION . I. ~printcm:ulBtorls name)...T r'l~A ~~4 -....0 _l._ _ r hereby verify evcrYpcrson who signed thIS sheet dId 10 In my prelence B '. beheve eB~ : re~islered voler in the city I district SIGNATInrn OF ClRCULAT . ~ ~~C'l- -s:-- :~ . til . f ~.. ... ~ .D ~ 11 -< . _~._'nno_.. ~. rI~ -.4.fo- R.d. ..7 -A"- CIRCULATOR'S ADDRESS (stre 'I ity'Bndzip c~dc)~ 6Cl II I ~ ::J: OJ -i C'l .u IE ,.... ~ rn E .... - '';: 'Xl -i '0 I' 0 " n ~. I EXH I B IT B - P26 FORM #2A Date Received' 3. 1'1. () g Planner: BJ 'CERTIFICATION OF REGISTERED VOTERS I hereby certify that if signatures on the attached petition are registered voters and reside in the area descn'bed in the petition. These signatures represent not less than 50 percent of the registered voters residing within the annexation or withdrawal area described in this petition. , , ~CN .:t. \ .;l, 00 .. ~:,;.;..t.."~I.f.,~~ ";r~\,,H c.'- :.:.Or--~-;;~"')"" 9~~( SEAL]:' "T'\ 011 . ~;. ~-:c..' ... ~ '1.'.... "7 ~. f-" r I:s~ . ~ ~~~~... 0':' ~~ """'T{ '~ l-i'~_._:"-'~\U~ . .\''--~~~ ~~ ~0Jv>\- De~~r Clerk Lane County, Oregon Date Informational Attachment EXHIBIT 5.(1.~'t, B - P27 Date Received' . , ., Planner: BJ For the proposed annexation of :l:4.J3 acres of y,uY"";J located at 600 Hayden Bridge Way. The area is descnbed on Lane County Assessor's Map 17-03-23-34, IL 12600 & 12700. The legal description of the l'.uy.....j follows: Beginning at an iron pipe set 90 feet West and 600 feet North ofa pouit 2,823.48 feet (42.78 chains) South of the Northeast comer of the Jacob Halstead Donation Land Claim No. 47, Notification No. 3810, in Section 23, Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, Lane County, Oregon; thence South 01. 01' 15" Easl90feetto an iron pipe; thence North 89" 53' West 31.5 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 00. 01' 15" East 150.50 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 89.53' East 127.59 feet to a point on the,West line of the William Spencer Donation Land Claim Number 50 that is marked by an iron pipe; thence South 00" 13' 30" West 319.50 feet along last said West line to a point on the north margin of Hayden Bridge Way as said margin is offset 40.00 feet northerly by perpendicular measurement from the centerline of said road; thence along said north margin of Hayden Bridge Way, North 89" 53' West 369.77 feet, more or less, to the Southeast comer of Lot 2, Block 6 of "Royal Delle", as platted and recorded in Book 29 at Page 21 in ,the Plat Records of Lane County, State of Oregon; , thence North 00" 01'15" West along the East line of said Block 6 and its Northerly extension 560 feet to an iron pipe; and thence South 89" 53'East 275 feet returning to the point of beginning and containing 4.13 acres more or . less: ' ' Zoning The Low DensitY Residential (LDR) zoning of the subject property and existing use is consIstent with the Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) and the City's Development Code. Churches are listed as a Discretionary Use in the LDR District. A site review permit for the church was issued by Lane County in July, 1984 and upheld by the Lane County Hearings Official in September, 1984 (Case PA1315-84). ' Sanitary Sewer The existing church is not currently connected to the city sanitary sewer system. There are three possible connection points for extension of sanitary sewer to the property: an existing public sanitary sewer line within Blackstone Street northeast of the property;.a public sanitary sewer line that extends south of Blackstone Street roughly parallel with and about 80 feet offset from the east y;vy....;j line of the site; and a sanitary sewer line at the intersection of Mint Meadow Way and Old Orchard Lane (appro,ximately 500 feet east of the southeastern comer of the site). The public sanitary sewer lines within and extending from Blackstone Street are located within the City limits. However, extension of a sanitary sewer line from the intersection ofMiilt Meadow Way and Old Orchard Lane would require approval of an extraterritorial extension along Hayden Bridge Way. Solid Waste Management The City and Sanipac have an exclusive franchise arrangement for garbage service inside the city limits. Upon annexation, Sanipac will serve this property. " Water Service Rainbow Water District is currently serving the site with water and will continue to do so until the July following the completion of annexation, at which time SUB Water will be the provider. Water service to the y.uy....;! originates from a 6-inch water main in Hayden Bridge, Way. ' EleCtric SUB Electric is currently serving the si~e with power from an overhead line running north-south along the western boundary of the site. Fire and Life Safety The Fire Marshal has reviewed the application and has determined that fire and emergency services are available to this property. The building has an existing fire sprinkler system and there is a fire hydrant at the southeast comer of ~* ' . Police Protection Upon annexation, the area will receive police protecti~n from the City of Springfield. Police l',u;"";';on and response to priority calls can be provided to this site upon annexation consistent with service protection throughout EXHIBIT B - P28 the city. Date Received: 3. (1.& t Planner: BJ Parks and Recreation Programs After annex3tion to the City of Springfield, the suhject p. v}'~ ;JWill be within the Willamalane Park and R...v. .";';on District boundary. City residents receiv~ park and ....... ",,;';on services fium the District. The District operates two aquatic centers, a Community Center, an AdultActivity Center, and 3 I pm containing a variety of outdoor recreational amenities. There is one park currently located in the vicinity of the annexation area; RnyaI , pelle, a 2.?6~acre neighborl).ood park at 401 Blackstone Stree,t .t\m()ngothcrfeatures, the p:u-k contains an open play area, basketball 'court, playground, picnic sheher and tables, and night lighting. Other nearby. ..........;.;onal opportunities include Harvest Landing and Page Park. A complete listing ofWillamalane's parks and programs cali be found on-line at www.WilIamalane.o~ or at 73&4044. Although the site is zoned LDR, there are no occupied dwellings on the site and none are proposed. For this reason, the property should not generate any additional demands for park and recreation facilities. Land Use Controls The City of Springfield Development Services Department has provided all planning and building functions for the owners of the subject property. The City of Springfield Development Services Department will continue tn provide land use control for the site after the annexation. Communication Facilities Qwest and AT&T currently provide communications in the area for cable service and an array of wireless companies provide different commUnication services. The City has no exclusive frnnchise arrangements with telecommunication or wireless companies. The field is competitive and therefore guanmtees a wide selection. Pnblic Schools Public School services are available through School District 19. Page Elementary School is located just to the east of the subject property: As slated previously, the site does not contain any dwellings and should not generate any additional demands on the school system. Stonnwater Control Roof runoff is directed onto the site, and passes into a series of ~ch basins within the site parking lot. From the catch basin.J .;...., stormwater infiltrates into a drywell. There are existing public stormwater facilities adjacent to the site within Hayden Bridge Way. Any future development or redevelopment on this site will require ~i"i",vr:ate stormwater management techniques in accordance with City standards. Approval of an ..':''';''u :;:niaI extension is not required to extend private stormwater lines through unineu. }'v. ..;~d areas to serve the site. EXHIBIT B - P29 " Office of the Secretuy of State Archives Division MARY BErn HERKERT Director BILL BRADBURY Secretary of State 800 Summer Sl NE Salem, Oregon 97310 (SD3) 373-0701 Facsimile (503)373-0953 February 19, 2008 " Date Received: 7.11, oS Planner: BJ Lane County Local Government BoUndary Commission Paula L Taylor ' 99 East Broadway, Suite 400 Eugene OR 97401-3111 Dear Ms. Taylor: Please be advised that we have received and filed the following Armexation(s): Ordinance Number Our File NUmber Date C SP 08-14 (Springfield) EC ED 07-50 (Eugene) AN 2008-0018 AN 2008-0019 02/14/2008 02/14/2008 Please verify tJ:ie effective date(s) for these annexations through the application of 0R5199.519. ' Our assigned file number(s) are included with the above information. Sincerely, ~v><-1~ r3~~ Linda Bjornstad Official Public Documents cc: Lane County Oerk ODOT /Highway Division PRC/Population Research Center Revenue Cartography Section WWW Server ....:... http://arcweb.sos;state.or.usll Internet E-mail -reference.archives@State.or.us Oregon Genealogy Listserv - ol..",v~...rchive14.sos.state.or.us