The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence PLANNER 3/31/2008 . ~.'"J~ ,...--<:. ,\ il..~lEXATioN WITHDRAWAL DIST~iTION LIST ,\,..~,. ~, A,J;(.O& Date Received' . / Planner: BJ Name: ' 'SpriiigfielcfF.aith Center BC # and/or Final Order #:C'SP'OS~14'Final Ordet 1332 Planning Journal #: LRP200"S:00005 -_.._----~ Name: BC # and/or Final Order #: Planning Journal #: Evans, Michael EC SP 07-64 LRP200S-00004 . Name: BC # and/or Final Order #: Planning Journal #: Nepute EC SP 07-35 LRP200S-00002 Name: BC ,# and/or Final Order #: Planning Journal#: Trotter EC SP 07-60 LRP200S-00003 . 'Brenda Jones, Planning Department (FileCop'yj (jo_l!r!i.~f ~_c!pyr) Bob Duey, Finance Director, City of Springfield Rick Sandoval, Oregon Department of Reyenue 955 Center Street, N.E.; Salem, Oregon 9,7310 Cartographic Unit, Oregon Department of Revenue 955 Center Street, N.E.; Salem, Oregon 97310 Paula Taylor, Lane Council of Government 99 E. Broadway, Suite 400; Eugene, Oregon 97401-3111 Alice Marks, lane County Tax Assessors Office. 125 E. 8th Avenue; Eugene, Oregon 97401 1-541-628-4134 312008 Annette Newingham, lane County Elections 135 E. 6th Avenue; Eugene, Oregon 97401 ' Marlene Metcalfe, Springfield Utility Board 202 S, 18th Street; Springfield, Oregon 97477 Ray Meduna, Springfield Utility Board PO Box 300; Springfield, Oregoi197477 Tim Hanley, Rainbow Water District PO Box 8; Springfield, Oregon 97477 Steve Barrett, Springfield School District 525 Mill Street; Springfield, Oregon 97477 , Northwest Natural Gas, Account Services, Attn: Annexation Coordinator 220 NW 2nd Street; Portland, Oregon 97209, ' QWEST 1801 California Street, Suite 2500; Denver, CO. 80202 ComCastCable, Attention: Tom Henerty " . 1 2897 Chad Drive; Eugene, Oregon 97408 Sanipac Attention: Annette Cardoza PO Box 10928, Eugene, Oregon 97440 -}I bjones/annexationlwater withdrawals distribution listl2008 Date Received: Planner: BJ 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (541) 726-3753 FAX (541) 726-3689 www.ci.springfield.or.us MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: cc: RICK SANDOVAL, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF REVENo/I BRENDA]ONES, PLANNING SECRETARY (541)726.3610 to WAIEROlSTRICT WITHDRAWALS FOR THE CI1YOF SPRINGFIElD 3/31/2008 PAuLA TAYLOR, BOUNDARY COMMlSS10N; FilES C SP 08-14; EC SP07-35, ECSP 07-60, EC SP 07-64; BOB OlJEY, CI1Y OF SPRINGFIELD;, ANNETfE NEWINGHAM, LANE COUNn' ELECTIONS; ALICE MARKS, LANE COUN1Y TAX ASSESSMENT & TAXATION; TIM HANIEY, RAINBOW WAIER OlSTRICT; MARLENE METCALFE, SPRINGFIElD UTILITY BOARD; RAY MEDUNA, SPRINGFIELD UTll11Y BOARD; SIEVE BARRETI, SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT; NW NATURAL GAS; QWEST; COMCAST CABLE; SANIPAc.. Enclosed is the paper work for 4 water withdrawals for the City of Springfield. I have included the City Council Agenda Item Summary (ArS), the signed Ordinance attachments Exhibit A and Exhibit B. Paula Taylor at the Lane County Boundary Commission has sent you the annexation information that is associated with each withdrawal; however, I have included copies of Paula Taylor's information as well. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding any information associated with this memo. . -oregon , LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION 99 East Bro}ldway Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401-3111 (541) 682-4425 FAX (541) 682~2635 February 13, 2008 Ms. Amy Sowa,Recorder City of Springfield 225 5th Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 Dear Ms. Sowa:' " ~ 1)1'~~' Date Received: ' , Planner: BJ The enclosed final order has been enacted by Jhe Lane County LOcal'Government Boundary Commission and is forwarded in conformance with ORS 199,505. Final Order 1332 (C SP 08 - 14) annexing territory to the City of Springfield (International Church of FO,ursquare Gospel), Please acknowledge receipt of this final order. Sincerely, , C?~~, :J~ Paula L. Taylor Executive Officer Enclosures, ec: II1ternational Church of Foursquare Gospel Rainbow Water and Fire Distriel ' Willamalane Park and Recreation,Distriet LCBC:LCOG: L\JJClFOLIPINOO8\CSP0814 FOLDOC Last Saved: February lJ. 2008 , , 'Ii Date Received: 1,?( .6i LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOllNDARY co~~llim~J FINAL ORDER 1332 Approved: February 7, 2008 Effective: February 7, 2008 ( File C SP 08 - 14 ( In the Matter of Annexing Territory ( T,o the City of Springfield -Legal Description Attached as Exhibit A . , , , WHEREAS, Resolution 07-59 by the City of Springfield was filed on December 31, 2007-in accordance with ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A)-for annexation of territory to the City of Springfield, described in attached Exhibit A and shown on a\tached map Exhibit B; and, WHEREAS, the commission duly published notice. of the public hearing in accordance with ORS 199.463 and in accordance with the rules ofth~ commission and ORS 199.452(1), conducted a public hearing on February 7,2008; and, WHEREAS, on the' basis of the study of tlie proposal, which considered economic, demographic, and sociological trends and physical development of the land including the applicable comprehensive plan, and of the pu'biie hearing, the commission approved the proposal and made the findings and reasons attached as Exhibit C. , NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED: Thal the area described be a part of the City of Springfield. ' '. ORDERED BY THE, LANE COUNTY LOCAL" GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION THIS 7th DA Y OF FEBRUARY 2008. , -~j'l !~~ Clay Myerst Chair . 2-Jo,!hp Date " 11' NOTE: The subject territory is. within the Rainbow Water and Fire DistriCt and will remain in the district until withdrawn through separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. ,. In accordance with ORS 199.510(2)( c), the territory.is hereby a part of the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District and Willamalane Park and Recreation District. pic LCBC: LIBc-FOLIPH\2OO81CSP08/4 FO.DOC Last Saved: February 7. ZOO8 11. EXHIBIT A I ,Date Received: ;;.?I.d& Planner: BJ Beg at. an iron pipe set 90.00 ft Wand 600.00 ft N of a pt 2,823.48 ft (42.78 eh) S of the NE cor of the Jacob Halstead OLe No. 47, Notification No. 3810, S23 T17S,R03W WM, Lane County, Oregon; th SOooOl' l5"E 90.00 ft to an iron pipe; th N89053'W 31.50 ft to an iron pipe;' th SOooO 1'15"E'150.50 ft to an iron pipe; th S89053 'E 127.59 ft to apt on the W Ii of the William Spencer DLC No. 50 that is marked by an iron pipe; th SOoo13'30"W 319.50 ft alg sd'W lito a pt on theN mar of Hayden Bridge Way, sd mar is offset 40.00 ft Nly by perpendicular measurement 'fr the c/li of sd rd; lh alg sd N mar N89053"W 369.77 ft mil to the SE cor Lot 2, Block 6 of Royal Delle, as platted and recorded in Bk 29 Pg 21 (COPR, Lane County, Oregon; th NOooOL' l5"W alg the E Ii of sd Block 6 and its Niy exten.sion 560.00 ft to an iron pipe; th S89053'E 275.00 fl to the POB, all in Lane County, Oregon.' LCBC:LCOG: LIBCVJ!GAL\2008\CSP0814 LGLDOC . Last Saved: February J J, 2008 Final Order 1332 CSP08-14 Page 1 of 1 1i. ~""<;~~,^",,':i ~ " ..,':-~~~\'t'$.. . ~.:.1i~ .. fJ~~;~~~ " -*'~~~,'~.'~~~~~~"\~"~ A~.._ ~~\~'\~ ,-~~~j:},\\\\"'~"\"'~ ~"":-"~""~~~~'9~~~~ ~'~.~~'~--,~'q~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~"\'~~ ~.t..~~~;~~\~~;: fL"~~~~,,~~~~,,,~ . ~~~~'\~~ Hayden Bridge Way J I I_.L I "I ANNEXATION AREA I Includes TLs 12600, 12700, 17"03-23-34 --I Owned by the International Church of Foursquare Gospel BC File CSPOB-14 , Black.stone Sl --- " ail ffil ~l I I ,/ ,Royal Delle Parle I I ~, '..,., I I Final Order 1332 C SP 08 - 14 Page 1 of 1 EXHffirr B Date Received' ?;,1L~~ Planner: BJ I ail ~I .s (0 "~. ... ," .... ".': .".:.: C" ID~._:..;:. ..,.".. 'n' ~~. ;.:~:.,? .::.':,>: - ::; . '. . . . -', . . . .'~. I J I.' 1. rI 'S..vl ~..""" ..6Y\ .;; Date Received; 3. ?/.d ~ 'Planner: BJ - ... '.' . EXHIBIT C Findings: 1. This proposal was initiated with the boundary commission by the City of Springfield I! . ,after receiving consents from the property owner on Dec~mber 31, 2007, in accordance with ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B). The propopl was found to be a valid filing under OAR 191-006. ., 2. The proposed annexation, as submitted, included tw,p tax lots (Tl7S R03W S23 Map 34 tax lots 12600 and 12700) comprising approximately 4.13 acres and was owned by the International Church of Foursquare Gospel. The arlnexaiion,area was developed with a church facility and was not contiguous to the main body of the City ofSpri"ngfield. 3. The land use designation for the annexation area; was low-density residential In the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan). 4. The annexation area was zoned LDR/UF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe, in, Lane County. After the annexation effective date, the property was rezoned LDR consistenl with the land use designation. Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the effects of the boundary change on other units of government. ORS 199.41O(1)(b) and 199.410(3)(c) 5. The boundary cotimussion held a public hearing on February 7, 2008. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with ORS 199 provisions. All interested parties were given a reasonable opportunity:to be heard. ' 6., ,After annexation to Springfield, the annexation area wo~ld be, withdrawn from the Rainbow Water and Fire District. '. There would be some finan~ial impact on the district because it derives its water revenu'e from user fees and the annexation area was developed with a 'church. The annex,ation area would be withdrawn from lhe district through separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. On behalf of the City of Springfield, the Springfield Utility"Board provided service directly to the annexation area. ;! ' 7. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the ,area was annexed automatically to the Lane' County Metropolitan Wastewater Service '.District in accordance with ORS 199.51O(2)(e). ' .' . ,j 8. Upon the effective date of the annexalion, the area was annexed automatically to the Willamalane Parks and Recreation District in'accordance with ORS 199:5l0(2)(c). 9. This request was consistent with this standard. Final Order 1332 CSP08-l4 Page 1 of3 Date Received: Planner: BJ '~"'."~,~:, ,"~';,~": :.t~:r'.. Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to .best meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long- range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a) and (e) 10. Annexation to the City of Springfield was identified in the acknowledged Metro Plan as the preferred method for providing key urban facilities and services to the area within Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary. 11. Annexation to an existing city was the method for extending urban facilities and services to urbanizable land in the boundary commission's policy administrative rule, implementing policies (1), (2), (5), and (7). 12. The proposed annexalion was the means of boundary change outlined in the Metro Plan and the boundary commission administrative. rules for ultimately providing urban facilities and services to this territory. Annexation of tax lotted property fulfilled lhe Metro Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary. 13. The proposed annexation met the criteria for nonco'ntiguous annexations in the boundary commission law and the Metro Plan. 14. This request was consistent with boundary conimission policies and this standard.' Make boundary commission determinations which are consistent with m:knowledged local comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future growth. .For major boundary changes, there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financially viable. ORS 199.410(1)(d), 199.41O(3)(b), and (d) 15. The annexation area was within the urban growth boundary of the acknowledged Metro Plan [Land Conservation and DeveloplI)ent Commission (LCDC) action in '1982 and as subsequently amended]. Annexation of tax lotted property assisted in fulfilling the Metro Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary. 16. The Metro Plan recognized' annexation to the City of Springfield as the highest priority for extending the minimum level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas. 17. The proposed use (ch.urch) was consistent with the policies in the Metro Plan requiring , urban levels of development within the urban growth boundary, 18. The City of Springfield indicated that the required services outlined in Metro Plan policy #8, page II-C-4 and defined on page V-3, were either available or can be provided in a timely manner. . Final Order 1332 C SP 08 -14 Page 2 of 3 '1 19. This request was,consistent with this standard. Date Received' 1," (.<'l~ Planner: BJ <. Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to th'e proposal. ORS 199.410(3)(d) and 199.462(1) " !; , . ' 20. The annexation proposal was consistent with the Metro Plan, as it was an incremental step in implementing the long-range plan for this area, The urbal) growth boundary, land . uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of. the metropolitan co'mmunity. The proposed use was consistent with the long-range plan for the area and fulfilled the ,growth policies in the Metro Plan and in Oregon law. 21. This request was consistent with this standard. Reasons: 1. The:proposal was supported by the City of Springfield and the property owner. 2. The proposal was consistent with the LCDC acknowledged Metro Plan. . ~. 3. The services requir~d in the Metro Plan were eithef" available or could be provided in a timely manner when needed. 4. The proposal was consistent with past boundary commission actions supporting annexation to the City of Springfield. 5. The proposal was consistent with boundary commission administrative rule policies. LCBC:LCOG: L:\BClFOLIEXCI2IJ08\CSP0814 EXCDOC LastSaved: February/I, 2008 Final Order 1332 CSP08-l4 Page 3 of 3 ~ ,i " ,'I ORDINANCE NO. J? 1 R (Special) Date Received. '?,7;r,oc6 Planner: BJ 'AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF FOURSQUARE GOSPEL, LOCATED IN NORTH SPRINGFIELD, NORTH OF HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, EAST OF 5TH STREET, WESt OF 7th STREET AND INVOLVING " , APPROXIMATELY 4.13 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAXS LOT 12600 AND 12700, T17S R03W S23 MAP 34 AND OTHERWISE KNOWN AS 600 HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, SPRINGFIELD; ,HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT. WHEREAS, certain real property described below was annexed to the City of Springfield by order of lane County local Government Boundary Commission under Boundary Commission Number File EC SP 08-14, effective 2f7/08, as recommended in City Planning File No,. LRP2006- 00030 and supported by City Council Resolution No. 07-59 (and further described in Exhibit A & 8), and , WHEREAS, the property to be withdrawn is located within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District, and WHEREAS, the City, of Springfield Commo~ Council held a public hearing and first reading in, the Springfield City Council ,Chambers on March 10, 2008; and a second reading and adoption on March 17, 2008, in accordance with ORS 222.524, for the.purpose of hearing any objections to the withdrawal of the property from the public service district mentioned and there having been no objections raised. NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the' real property described should be in the best interest of the City of Springfield withdrawn frOm the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, insofar as the property is located therein. Section 2: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the following described real property within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District is and shall be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, said property being described as follows: Township 17South, Range 03West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax Lots 12600, and 12700, and commonly known as 600 Hayden Bridge Road in Springfield; as more particularly described in Exhibit B of this ordinance, Boundary Commission File Number EC SP 08-14. ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 17h day of March 2008, by a vote of 5 for and 0 against., .. APPROVED by the Mayor of the e'ty Ofs".Pringfield th'~~ 1 ~y of March 2008., . <!l ,. <: ~~, - M~or r . ' ~~ City R~rder ATTEST: '/', , .,' ~;"~~_2_ _S~_'':::\- ) I b " :2-,:2. 'l; \ 0",.,___ " ',', ': .,' :~. f : ' - Blackstone 81. -- \ '- '" , I r I Royal Del/e parle c=_.stU I '~ '~."I ( ~ r l L:> 'Ill'l r r . NottDn:m. Date Received' -). ~ 10 i Planner: BJ - I }I i U)~ ~ 1 Blacl<Stone 81.' iF I ~~~\~\';:,\,~;~""",;~. " I ~~~'~:,~~"R"'\\""~,~''\~ <'. I '&"R \~;"",:,::,:;,:,:,,;,,::\,,~~,,,. . I ~~,,'\; ~~";""(\"""""'\~~ ' . .. ,...(;,'" \ .""''.''~~'~~.. / - . ~"'."""""""~,:,~",\:,,,,.~ I ~\~,..,' ",~,,,~. ;"".~'''''\: I .:.", .." :-;" " .. '''-''' ~~.. "~~~~,,. ,,,~,,,,,,,, .- ~~":"""~~1Z~: j ,\\" ,...'" '''\'' ,~, '.. 0. ~ ~,.\"'"'>;'~''' "~ ~.~''''''~ "~,,,' '%m~,,,,~~~,,\,;m~~~~~;:;"\..':"l'" ,'\.~:~,~.. ,~~~ . '1.. ~"~>>:~~" ''''l.",,~''~'\~ .'~~W"~~"i;: ~~.::,.:~:,,~'&,~~,~'%~;.\.:~s,~; - ,""~~, ,',':':'..'1\:.",,-,,,,",,, ""~~~" e }"'"'' '~~""" .. "'~''''-': ~~,~,".'''''\ ~~' ::::I -..."""...... ~:"...~ '\ ,~, ~, :>:,...~:.'>,...,"~,~ ,i!';o .,~,;;~\ " ",',,"''''''~'; "'im"\~'" -0 ~)'J\ "{...,\,y,,, "'."~~"~~~~~ ~~"~~"'.",, ..",'."",,":":'" - - ~,*~~~~~'''''' '~M'~'''' "~'\Wi.~ I'! .~"",'.;)!.,\':''',,\~''* ,~'t_:t ~ "''.'*''''~.~''''~~\~'.~' ::'-~ ~ ~'~~'\~'~~~~~'~'~~~~'~~~;'~: .. ~':;:'~";:"""~~'\"Io""'~~,,,,,;.,, ,,\,~,,:\ ---... "~ \ ""':::;..~~"\:-'\\' ...., ''''''''~\.~~~ Hayden Bridge Way - III ~I -,ll'll II II J!..AJiWl.l A 3:!.!! ~e I, ~::J a~ ",0 ~ i ,::J II & .... :.. -,- en ~. 5 i r- "' EXHIBIT A:- P1 -----.. :: " ,,! '. '. Rciyaldel Lane ~. .' . " , \ \ 1 Gl ' River Knoll W~y.i' I~ II, o '0 .0 '-';.' ;~' : "l //1 ,',' " '.. ". ".::, .~~{,~ Legal Description Beginning at an iron pipe set 90 feet West and 600 feet North ofa point 2,823,48 feet (42.78 chains) South of the Northeast comer of the ~acob Halstead Donation Land Claim No. 47, Notification No, 3810, in Section 23, . Township 17 South; Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, Lane County, Oregon; thence South 010 01' 15" East 90 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 89" 53' West 31.5 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 000 01' 15" East 150.50 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 89053' East 127.59 feet to a point on the West line of the William , Spencer Donation Land Claim Number 50 that is marked by an iron pipe; thence South 000.13' 30" West 319.50 feet along last said West line to a point on the north margin of Hayden Bridge Way as said margin is offset 40.00 feet northerly by perpendicular measurement from the centerline of said road; thence along said north margin of Hayden Bridge Way, North 890 53' West 369,77 feet, more or less, to the Southeast comer of Lot 2, Block 6 of "Royal Delle", as platted and recorded in Book 29 at Page 21 in the Plat Records of Lane County, State of Oregon; thence North 00. 01 '15" West along the East line of said Block 6 and its Northerly extension 560 feetto an iron pipe; and thence South 89" 53' East 275 feet returning to the point of beginning and containing 4.13 acres more or less. , ". EXHIBIT B - Pl .' -oregon LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION 99 East Broadway , " 1-, hI O~ Suite 400 Date Received:") 'j Eu.ene, OR 97401-3111 Planner: BJ (541)682-4425 '1, ",' FAX (541) 682-2635 . ,...~.~ February 13; 200~ ..t: , . ';1 '\ Ms. Amy Sowa, Recorder City of Springfield 225 5th Street Springfieid, Oregon 97477 ", Dear Ms. Sowa: The enclosed final order has been enacted by the Lane: County Local Government Boundary 'C~mmission and is forwarded in conformance with ORS 199.505. ' . Final Order 1332 (C SP 08 - 14) :umexi~g territory to the City of Springfield" (International Church of Foursquare Gospel) , ' , . , " Please acknowledge receipt of this final order. Sincerely, Oeu<A~jr Paula L. Taylor Executive Officer Enclosures ce: Ir1ternational Church of Foutsquare Gospel Rainbow Water and Fire District Willamalane Park and Recreation District 'LCBC:LCOG: L'\JJClFOLV'J/\2008\CSPOB14 FOLDOC LasrSaV<d: Feb",aryJ], 2008 EXHIBIT B P2 ....:' , .~ ,.! LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNM ::NT BOUNDARY COMMISSION 701,()1 ' I ( Date Received' FINAL ORDER 1332 Plariner: BJ Approved: February 7, 2008 Effective: February 7,2008 ( FileCSP08-l4 ( In the Matter of Annexing Territory ( To the City of Springfield , - Legal Description Attached as Exhibit A - , WHEREAS, Resolution 07-59 by the ct of Springfield was filed ~n December 31, 2007-in accordance with ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A}-for annexation of territory to the City of , I ' Springfield, described in attached Exhibit A and shown on attached map Exhibit B; and, WHEREAS, the commission duly pUbliJed notice of th~ P~bliC hearing in accordance with ORS 199.463 and in accordance with the tules of the 'commission and ORS 199.452(1), conducted a public hearing'on February 7, 2008; ahd, WHEREAS, on the basis of the study if the proposal, which considered e~onomiC,' demographic, and sociological trends andphy~ical development of the land including the I ' applicable comprehensive plan, and of the public hearing, the commission approved the proposal and made the findings and reasons attached as Exhibit C. , .',', .1 . NOW TIIEREFORE IT IS ORDERED: That the, area described be a part of the City of Springfield. ORDERED BY TIIE lANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION THIS 7'h DAY OF FEBRUARY ;',008. ~ J ' ,^__ Clay- MY~ Chair 2-JD-..,IDP ~Datel c; NOTE:' The subject territory is within the Rainbow ,Water and Fire District and will remain in the district until withdrawn through separate proceedingsl by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. In accordance with ORS 199.510(2)(c), the territory is hereby a part of the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District and WiIlamalane Park and Recreation District. , . pI: LCBC: L'\BClFOL\PH\lOOIf\CSP08U FO.DOC Uut SaYed: F'~nH1ry 7. 2008 . EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B - P3 Date Received: Planner: BJ 1,1(jJ1:, Beg at an iron pipe set 90.00ft Wand 600.00 ft N of apt 2,823.48 ft (42.78 eh) S of the NE cor of the Jacob Halstead DLC No. 47, Notification No. 3810, S23 T17S R03W WM, Lane County, Oregon; th SoooOl'ls"E 90.00 ft to an iron pipe; th N89os3'W 31.50 ft to an iron pipe; th SoooOl' ls"E 150.50 ft to an iron pipe; th S89os3'E 127,59 ft to a pt on the W Ii of the William Spencer DLC No, 50 that is marked by an iron pipe; - th Sooo13'30''W 319.50 ft alg sd W Ii to a pt on the N mar of Hayden BridgeWay, sd mar is , offset 40.00 ft Nly by perpendicular measurement fr the cJli of sd rd; . th alg,sd N mar N89053"W 369.77 ft mil to the SE cor Lot 2, Block 6 of Royal Delle, as platted and recorded in Bk 29 Pg 21 LCOPR, Lane County, Oregon; th NoooOl' ls"W.alg the E Ii of sd Block 6 and its Nly extension 560.00 ft to an iron pipe; th S89os3'E 275.00 ft to the POB, all in Lane County, Oregon. LCBC:LCOG: L:\BC\l..EGAL\2008\CSPO/j14 LGL.DOC Las, Saved: February 11.2008 Final Cider 1332 CSP08-l4 Page 1 of 1 LlL_1 _I ,ANNEXATION AREA : Includes TI.s 12600, 12700, 17-03-23-34 --J Owned by the International Gnm:h , of Four.;quare Gospel BCFileCSP08-14 I I , :~.....'; , .J. - Blackstone Sl ..- " ,/' I I I I , Royal Delle Parle .J ~ .1 Final Order 1332 C SP 08 - 14 . Page 1 of 1 I .late Received: ~.?; I ,oS Planner: BJ EXHIBIT B - P4 .EXHffiITB ail ~I ~I I I I III -I, :' CD ~:r::.~i~.';' ":^'>:id{Gt~ll : '.d~ 1.. '.\,:r'~ 'i'ri,~i:' :':._..!;.....;1<.... j I ! rl .'5<Ao1t ~~ ...."''eel\'') EXHIBIT B - P5 '. pXHIBIT C Date Received: 7;J.7J( ,O~ Planner: BJ . Findings: / 1. This proposal was initiated with the boundary commission by the City of Springfield after receiving consents from the property owner on December 31, 2007, in accordance with ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B). The proposal was found to be a valid filing under OAR 191-006. 2. The proposed annexation, as submitted, included two tax lots (T17S R03W S23 Map 34 tax lots 12600 and 12700) comprising approximately 4.13 acres and was owned by the International Cnurch of Foursquare Gospel. The annexation area was developed with a church facility and was not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. 3, The land use designation for the annexation area was low-density residential in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan). 4. The annexation area was zoned LDRlUF, low~density residential with urbanizing fringe, in Lane' County. After the annexation effective date, the property was rezoned LDR consistent with the land use designation. Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the effects of the ,boundary clwnge on other units of government. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and 199.410(3)(c) , 5. The boundary commission held a public hearing on February 7, 2008. Notice of the public hearing was given in accordance with ORS 199 provisions, All interested parties were given a reasonable opportunity to be heard, 6. After annexati'on to Springfield, the annexation area would be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water and Fire District There would be some financial impact on the district because it derives its water revenue from user ,fees and the annexation area was developed with a church. The annexation area would be withdrawn from the district through separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. On behalf of the City of Springtield, the Springfield Utility Board provided service directly to the annexation area. , ' 7. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed automatically to the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District.in accordance with ORS 199.5l0(2)(c). 8. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed automatically to the Willamalane Parks and Recreation District in accordance with ORS 199.51O(2)(c). 9, This request was consistent with this standard.n Final Order 1332 CSPOS-14 Page 1 of3 Date Received: Planner: BJ ~ ~I ,tJi EXHIBIT B - PG, ..~ . .. Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long- range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a) and (e) 10. Annexation to the City of Springfield was identified in the acknowledged Metro Plan as the preferred method for providing key urban facilities and services to the area within Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary, 11. Annexation to an existing city was the method for extending urban facilities and services to urbanizable land in the boundary commission's policy administrative rule, implementing policies (I), (2), (5), and (7). ' 12. The proposed annexation was the means of boundary change outlined in the Metro Plan and the boundary commission administrative' rules for ultimately providing urban facilities and services to this territory, Annexation of tax lotted property fulfilled the Metro Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary. 13. The proposed annexation met the criteria for noncontiguous annexations in the boundary commission law and the Metro Plan. 14. This request was consistent with boundary commission policies and this standard. Make boundary commission determiniztions which are consistent with acknowledged local comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public sf!rvices required in the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future 'growth. For major boundary changes, there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financially viable. ORS 199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b), and (d) 15. The annexation area was within the urban growth boundary of the acknowledged Metro Plan [Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) action in 1982 and as subsequently amended]. Annexation of tax lotted p'''p".;y assisted in fulfilling the Metro Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary. 16. The Metro Plan recognized 'annexation to the City of Springfield as the highest priority for extending the minimum level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas. 17. The proposed use (church) was consistent with the policies in the Metro Plan requiring urban levels of development within the urban growth boundary. 18. The City of Springfield indicated that the required services outlined in Metro Plan policy #8; page IT-C-4 and defined on page V-3, were either available or can be provided in a timely manner. Fmal Order 1332 CSP08-14 Page 2 of 3 EXHIBIT B P7 ~'"- '..: Date Received: ?j.J;(,c1g - Planner: BJ 19. . This request"was eonsi~tent with this standard. Consider the comprehensive plnn's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposal. ORS 199.410(3)(d) and 199.462(1) ," 20. The annexation proposal was consistent with the Metro Plan, as it was an incremental step in implementing the long-range plan for this area. The urban growth boundary, land uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the metropolitan community. The proposed use was consistent with the long-range plan for the area and fulfilled the growth policies in the Metro Plan and in Oregon law. 21. This request was consistent with this standard. Reasons: 1. The proposal was supported by the,City of SpringJ;ield and the pwp,"..y owner. 2. The proposal was consistent with the LCDC acknowledged Metro Plan. . , 3. The serVices required in the Metro Plan were eitl!er .available or could be provided in a timely manner when needed. 4. The 'proposal was consistent with past boundary commission actions supporting annexation to the City of Springfield. 5. The proposal was consistent with boundary commission administrative rule policies. LCBC:LCOG: L:\BC\FOLIEXC\200B\CSP0814 EXC.OOC lAst Sav~d:. Fl!bruary J J. 2008 . Fmal Order 1332 CSP08-14 Page 3 on . ..~, ... - '..'.., Date Received: 1" 1 j.()' Planner: BJ EXHIBIT B - PB, ----, ... STAFF NOTES LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION (99 Eas1 Broadway, Suile 400. ~gene. OR 97401-3111) ~gcne City HaIl CDlDleil OIamber m P=I Sueet. ~geue Felnuary 7. 2008 7:00 pm. Annexation of Territory to the Citv of Snrinl!field OnteIDational Church of FourSQuare Gosnen IV.A. BC File C SP 08 - 14 Initiated by Resolution 07-59 by the City of Springfield with consents from property owners Action under ORS 199-490(2)(a)(A) of the boundary commission law Received December 31, 2007 Action to be taken by March 30, 2008 Descrintion The aririexation area includes two tax lots located in east Springfield, north of Hayden Bridge Way, east of Sib Street, south of Blackstone Street, and west of Old Orchard Lane ' Property ownerl: International Church of Foursquare Gospel (600 Hayden Bridge Way, Spriugfield) Tax lots: 12600 and 12700, Tl7S R03W S23 Map 34 Acres: :t4,13 Estimate of existing population: 0 Existing land use: Church and related facilities, vacant , , Existing zoning in Lane County: LDR\UF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay Applicable comprehensive plan: Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (acknowledged in August 1982 and has been subsequently amended) Existing public services to the l'wl''"''J. Police (Oregon State 'Police, Lane County Sheriff), 'schools (Springfield School District 19), roads (Lane County, City of Springfield); fire (Rainbow Water and Fire District contracting with the City of , Springfield), water (Rainbow Water and Fire District) Reason for Annexation The y.~y...;j oWner requested annexation to prepare the site for additional church facility development. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan requires l'wf"",Jes to annex in order to receive urban services, Notice As required by ORS 199-463(1), notice of a .public hearing must be published in a newspaper of general circulation not more than 25 days nor less than 15 days before the I F,vy~'j owner means me owner of me title ofreaJ property or me contracl plU"Chaser of real y.vy..., 'as shown on the lastavailable complele assessment roll. ORS 199.415(13) , LO...GBC Staff Notes (C Sp 08 -14) - February 7, 2008 Page IV-A-l EXHIBIT B - gall! Reoeived' '1.11.6t Planner:BJ hearing. In this case, notice of the public hearing was advertised in ,The Eugene Register-Guafd an 17, 2008. A second notice may be published in a newspaper of general circulation or notice of the hearing may b~ mailed to each owner of land in the affected territory,2 as described in the petition,3 not, more than 15 days before the hearing. In this case, notice of the hearing was sent to the affected property owner (Tim Baskin' and Lynda Gupton, on behalf of the International 07Urch of Foursquare Gospe~ owner of the propertyproposed for annexation) on January 25, 2008. The final notice required . by the boundary commission law is the posting of a notice of the public hearing in ..the affected city, district, or territory at least 15 days Defore the hearing. In this case, notice of the public hearing was posted in the area of the annexation, at tJie Springfield dty ha/~ and at the Lane County courthouse on January 23, 2008. -..... - - ~ ,. .. l: In conformance with OAR 191-005-0065(3), these staff ,notes are incorporated as part of the record of the boundary commission public hearing of Febru,ary 7, 2008. . This annexation proposal was filed with the boundary commission in accordance with ORS 1 99.490(2)(a)(A), initiated by Resolution No. 07-59 by the'City of Springfield. Prior to initiating the annexation, the City of Springfield received written consent from the P,vl'''''i owner (Tim Baskin and Lynda Gupton, on behalf of the International Church of Foursquare Gospel) requesting annexation. At the time the annexation was initiated by the city, there were no electors4 registered within the annexation area. The statut9ry provision to receive consents from owners is met. The proposal was filed with the boundary eOrnpllssion on December 31, 2007, and boundary commission action' must occur by March 24, 2008 (90-day statutory time frame). If the 'annexation is approved by the boundary commission on February 7, 2009, it will become , , effective upon passage of the final order. ' , The l',vl'vsed annexation area includes two tax lots (refer t!> Maps No. IV-A-l and IV-A-2). The annexation area is currently developed with one ,church on site. Annexation to Springfield will allow additional church development to occur. The annexation area is not contiguous to the main body of, the City of Springfield. It is adjacent , to other noncontiguous portions of the city. Tbe urb~ growth boundary (UGB) is located approximately 600 feet north of the',annexation area. TIle annexation area is designated low- density residential in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) and is zoned LDR\UF, low-density'residential with w-banizing fringe overlay, in Lane County, Upon the effective date of the annexation, the VF overlay will automatically be removed and the annexed proper;ties will be zoned consistent with the plan designation. 2 Affected territory meanS the territory descnbed in the petition. ORS 199.4]5(3) 3 Petition means the documents required to initiate a boundary change and inclodes, but is not limited to, an initiating document, legal description, cadastral maps, and infonnation fonn. ORS 199.4]5(]4), ORS ]99.490(4), and OAR ] 9] -006-0000(3) , · Elector means an individual registered to vote at an'address within the' affected territory. ORS 199.490(1) and (5) and ORS J99.505 ' " . Lo...GBC Staff Notes (e SP08-14)'- February 7,2008 Page IV-A-2 P9 " ..,,-., " Date Re'ceived' Planner: BJ 1/7 vd EXHIBIT B - P10 .'. ., The annexation was initiated by the Cityof Springfield on December 3,2007. An Annexation Agreement outlining the agreements between the ciiy and the owner for the provision of urban services and financing responsibility has been fully exe~ted for the annexation area. , BOUNDARY COMMISSION REFERRALS Boundary commission referrals were se* to the Larie County Land Management Division, Lane County Environmental Health Division, Lane County Board of Commissioners, and Rainbow Water and Fire District. No referral responses were received as o~ January 30, 2008. BOUNDARY COMMISSION STANDARDS - STAFF ANALYSIS In this section of the staff notes, each ~pplieable boundary commission standard is addressed, These standards are derived froin ORS 199 and the boundary commission's policy administrative rule (OAR 191, Division 30). Provide an impartiLll forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the effects of the bou;lIlary change on o!her units of governments. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and 199.410(3)(c) This annexation request was filed in accordance with provisions in ORS 199 and was determined , to be a valid filing in accordance with OAR 191-006 (adopted administrative rule on boundary comriussion filing requIrements). The i,tem was placed on the boundary commission's agenda for February 7, 2008. ,Notice of the bouIJdary commission's public hearing has been published in accordance with Oregon law. Any person may attend and will be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The proposed annexation area is within',the Rainbow Water and Fire District. The fire district contracts with the City of Springfield for rrre services within itS boundaries. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the annexation ~a will be automatically withdrawn from the fire district in accordance with ORS 199.51O(2)(a)"and the city will provide fire servi~es directly to the II . ' annexed property. " ' The Metro Plan identifies the city as the ultimate provider of urban services within the UGB. Policy #18, page ll-C-6, in the Metro Plan recognizes that as annexations to the city occur, existing special service districts within the UGB v,:illbe dissolved. The continued annexation of properties to the City of Springfield is consistent with the Metro Plan, which likely will result in the elimination of several special districts within the urbanizable area. Upon annexation, the area will be annhed automatically into the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District [ORS 199.51O(2)(c)]. This special district was formed to provide the financing for the regional wastewat,er treatment plant serving wastewater users within the cities'ofEugene arid Springfield and oth~rusers within the urbanizable area. LCLGBC Staff Notes (e SP 08 -14) - February 7, 2008 Page N-A-3 EXHIBIT B - P11 Date Received: '?'? (.o~ Planner: BJ Upon annexation, the . area will be annexed automati"ally into the Willamalane Park and Recreation District, which provides park and recreation f~eilities and services to territory within the City of Springfield. : This request is eonsisteni with this standard. '. . ~ Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of'local government boundaries to best meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where intergovernmental options are identified and make deciSions based on the most effective long- range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a) and (e) The'area in this annexation proposal is located within the acknowledgedUGB of the Metro Plan. Territory within the UGB ultimately will be within the City of Springfield. Springfield is the unit of government identified in the Metro Plan to provide urban services to territory in this area. The proposed annexation isnot contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. \' . Noncontiguous annexations are allowed by state annexation law and provided for in the Metro Plan if certain criteria are met. The Metro Plan policy for noncontigUous aniJexation (policy #12, page II-C-5) requires that noncontiguous annexations meet the following criteria: a. The area to be annexed will be provided urban service(s), which is (are) desired immediately by the residents/property owners. ' . . . , b. The area to be annexed can be serviced (:-vith a minimum level, of services, as directed in the Metro Plan) in a timely and cost-efficient manner and is a logical extension of the city's service delivery syst~m, c. The annexation proposal is accompanied by support within the area l'<Ul'vsed for annexation from the owners of at least half the land area in the affected' territory. . " . , " This annexation 'is consistent with boundary commission administrative rule, implementing . policies (I), (2), (5), and (7) which recognize annexation to an existing city as the preferred method of servicing urbanizable land: (1) This policy recognizes cities as thelo~cal providers of urban levels of service within urban growth boundaries when consistent with the comprehensive plan. (2) This policy expresses the commission's preference for providing urban services through annexation to a city in order to proVide urban services to urbanizable lands.' , (5) This policy encourages the provision of urban levels of service within :urban growth boundaries. LCLGBC Staff Notes (e sp 08 - 14) - February 7, 2008 Page Iv-A-4 . EXHIBIT B - P12, -..:.,1." .: .,;~>~.;.':" ,":'; - . '\ .V""i':. ' Date Received: ' 7, 31. Di, Planner; BJ (7) This policy expresses the ,commission 's preference for annexation to an existing city over all other alternatives as a means of extending services to urbanizable lands. hnplementing policy (3) recognizes that'in order to meet the long-term objectives of annexing out to an acknowledged urban growth boundary, short-term boundaries are created which are logical within the context of the future service boundary.' In the long term territory within this geographic area will be annexed to Springfield. Annexation to the city fulfills the policies adopted in the Metro Plan of annexing out to the urban growth boundary. This' j-,.upusal to annex territory to the City of Springfield is consistent with boundary cornmissionpolleies and this standard. Make boundary commission determinations which are consistent with. acknowledged local comprehensive plans. As~ure an, adequate quality and quantity of public services required in the comprehensive plan to meet' eristing and future growth. FOT major boundary changes, there must be assurance that the prop,osed unit of government is financially viable. ORS 199,410(l)(d), 199,410(3)(b) and (d) The proposal is within the Metro Plan urban growth boundary. The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) in August 1982' and has been subsequently amended. the Metro Plan recognizes annex'ation as the highest priority for extending the minimum levell'of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas (policies #8 and #10, page D-C-4) and recognizes that ultimately, all territory within the urban growth boundary will be annexed to an disting city (poli~y # 16, page 1I-C-6). , The annexation area is currently design~ted low-density residential in the Metro Plan. If the annexation is approved, the tax lotied pr~perties will be rezoned to a !.DR, a city zoning district consistent with the plan designation.' ' The annexation area will take advantage of urban service delivery systems that are already in place to serve this area The' following facilities and services are either available or can be extended to this annexation area. Water - The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District. The city indicates " there is existing 6-inch water line located in Hayden Bridge Way. Service to new development , . within the annexation area can be provided by this line: Following annexation, the City of Springfield will' withdraw the property from the Rainbow Water and Fire District in' accordance with ORS 222 and the Springfield Utilii~ Board (SUB) will provide services to the annexation area. An intergovernmental agreement between'the water district and ,SUB and state law will delennine the orderly transition of services and finances between the two service providers. Electricitv':' Springfield Utility Board (SUB) provides electric service to developed p>U!-,"> Jes in this area of south Springfield. New development in the annexation area,will be served by SUB. , LO...GBC Staff Notes (C SP 08 -14) -February 7, 2008 Page IV-A-5 " EXHIBIT B -P13 Date Received: ? 'J \ - 0 ~ Planner: BJ <". Police services - Springfield staff indicates that police currently provide service to other properties in this general area already inside the eity_ After annexation, this proposal area will receive police services on an eqmil basis with properties inside the city. Infill annexations and development in this area will increase the efficiency of service delivery to this area. Fire and emereencv services - Fire protection is currently provided to the annexation area by the Rainbow Water and Fire District. This special district contracts with the City of Springfield for fire services to territory within the district's boundaries. Upon annexation, the annexing area will be withdrawn from the fire district and Springfield will provide fire services directly to the ,annexation area. Springfield fire stations are located near Pheasant A venue and Hayden Bridge Way, S 47th Street and Main Street, and S 68th Street and Main Street. ' Emergency medical transport (ambulance) services are prpvided on a regional basis by Eugene, Springfield, and Lane Rural Fire/Rescue to central Lan~ County. The annexation area y,oill continue to receive this service consistent with ll1e adopted' ambulance service area (ASA) plan. Mutual aid a6'':''-~uents have been adopted by the three regional ASA providers to provide backup coverage for each other's jurisdictions. Parks and recreation - Upon annexation area to the City of Springfield, the annexing area will also be annexed to the Willamalane Park and Recreation District. Park and recreation services , are provided to the City of Springfield by the park district. Indoor recreation facilities, such as the Willamalane Park Swim Center, Lvely Park Swim Center, Memorial Building Community Center, and Williunalane Adult Activity Center will be available to residents as new development , occurs., The park district offers various after-school and other programs for children at schools and parks throughout the community. Also availableaie pathways and several categories of parks, including community parks, sports parks, special use parks, and natural area parks. There is one park currently located ,in the vicinity of the annexation 'area, Royal Delle, a 2.76-acre neighborhood park on Blackstone Street: Other nearby recreational vl'l'vmmiti'es include ',Harvest Landing and Page Park. Schools - ~pringfield School District 19 serves this area. Existing schools-Guy Lee elementary, Hamlin and Springfield high-serve this neighborhood; Ilowever, the annexation area does not contain any residential dwellings and should not generate "an'y additional demands on the school system. Wastewater - Springfield staff indicated tal the existing church within'the annexation area is not , currently connected to the city wastewater system. There are three possible connection points for extension of wastewater service to the annexation area: an existing 6-inch line wIthin Blackstone Str~et northeast of the annexation area; an 8-ineh line that extends south of Blackstone Street roughly parallel. with and about 80 feet offset from the east l'wl'''''i line of the annexation area; and an 8-inch line at the intersection of Mint Me~dow Way and Old Orchard Lane (approximately 500 feet east of the southeastern corner of the annexation area). The public wastewater lines within and extending from Blackstone Street are located within the city limits. However, extension of a wastewater line from the intersection of Mint Meadow Way and Old LCLGBC Staff Notes (CSP08- ]4) -February 7,2008 Page N-A.{j Date Raceived:lll, D i Planner: BJ EXHIBIT B P14 1, .._1"" ".',' ~ . ."; Orchard Lane along Hayden Bridge Way would be outside the city limits until the right-of-way is annexed, . Upon the annexation effective date, the area will be annexed automatically to the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District [ORS 199,5l0(2)(c)]. I . Stormwater - Springfield staff indicated \pat roof runoff is directed onto the site and passes into a series of catch basins within the site parking lot. From the catch basin system, stormwater infiltrates into a drywell. There is an exi~ting 18-inch stormwater line adjacent to the annexation area within Hayden Bridge Way, Appri;>val from Lane County is needed before connection to this system may occur. Any further devflopment or redevelopment in the annexation area will require al'l''''l'.:ate stormwater management techniques in accordance with city standards. Streets,... The annexation area abut~ Hayden Bridge Way on its south sid~, which is fully improved with curb. 3l!d gUtter, pavenihnt, sidewalks, and street lights. ' An interconnected transportation system will be required in ::order to provide access and a transportation system for the provision of fire, and life safety services to and from the annexing properties. Hayden Bridge Way is not located within the Springfield ~city limits. Solid waste management - Private fIrms and individuals collect and transport solid waste to the Lane County administered landfill. . . Communication facilities - Various providers offer both wire and wireless communication services in the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area, Existing providers and those entering the market have the capability to provide serVice to future deveH)pment in this area Land use controls -, The l'.vl'....;j is within Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary. Through an intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and the City of Springfield, the " city already has planning and building jllrisdietion for this property. The city will continue to administer land use controls after annexation. ' :1 The minimum level of key urban faeilitjes and services, as defined on page V-3 of the Metro Plan, are either immediately available or'ean be provided within a reasonable future time frame as needed. This request is consistent,witE this standard. , i Consider the comprehensive plan.'seconomic, demographic, and sociological trends and projections and its environmental pOlicies, pertinent to the proposaL ORS199.410(3)(d) and . 199.462(1) . The annexation proposal is consistent with the Metro Plan, as it is an incremental step in implementing the long-range plan,for this area. The urban growth boundary, land use~, and policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the metropolitan community. The existing and proposed uses are consistent wjth the long-range plan fo~ the area and will fulfill the growth policies in the Metro Plan and in Oregon law. ' LCLGBC Staff Notes (C SP 08 - 14) - Febru'1fY' 7, 2008 Page N-A-7 EXHIBIT B - P15 ;. ! TIris request is consistent with this boundary eoI!llllission standard. Date Received: Planner: BJ 1,No~ STAFF RECOMMENDATION The boundary commission staff recommends that the 'proposed annexation to the City of Springfield (BC File C SP 08 - 14) be approved as submitted based on the following findings " . and reasons. The findings are organized to respond to boundary commission standards outlined in ORS 199, the boundary commission law. The following fmdings and reasons are based on approval of the request as submitted. If the boundary, coI!llllission modifies or denies the proposal, the fmdings and reasons would need to be adjusted. Findin!!s: I. TIris proposal was initiated with. the boundary commission by the City of Springfield after receiving consents from the property owner on December 31, 2007, in accordance willi ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B). The proposal was found to pe a valid filing under OAR 191-006. 2. The proposed annexation, as submitted, included two tax lots (T17S R03W S23 Map 34 tax lols 12600 and 127(0) comprising approximately 4.13 acres and was owned by the International Church of Foursquare Gospel. The annexation area was developed with a church facility and was not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield; 3. The land' use designation for the annexation area was low-density residential in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan). 4. The annexation area was zoned LDR/UF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe, , in Lane COUllty. After the annexation effective date, the property was rezoned LDR consistent with the land use designation. Provide an impartial forum for resolution oj local juriSdictional questions. Consider the effects of the boundary change on other units of government ORS 199.410(1)(b} and 199,410(3)(c} 5, The boundary commission held a public hearing 'on February 7, 2008. Notice of the pubIi,c hearing was given in accordance with ORS 199 provisions. All interested parties were ,given areasonable, ~PtM ~.Inity to be heard. 6: ' After annexation to Springfield, the annexation' 'area would be withdrawn from the ' Rainbow Water and Fire District. There would be some financial impact on the district because it derives its water revenue from user fees and the annexation area was developed with a church. The annexation area would be withdrawn from the district through separale p~oceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. On behalf LCLGBC Staff Notes (C sp 08 -14) - February 7, 2008 Page N -A-8 -."...' . , '~.' '. ',_. .' . , I Date Received' ~,~I,o 'b Planner: BJ , EXHIBIT B - P15 ,> '1".. .- of the City of Springfield, the Springfield Utility Board provided service directly to the annexation area. 7. , Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed autolnati~yto the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater,Service District in accordance with ORS 199.5l0~2)(c). 8. Upon the effective date of the a,nnexation, the area was annexed automatically to the Willamalane Parks and Recreatio~ District in accordance with ORS 1~9.51O(2)(c). " 9. This request was consistent with this standard: 'I ' " Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best '. & . meet the needs of Lane County an.d Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long- range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.4](j(3)(a) ~~ " 10. Annexation to the City of Springfield was identified in the acknowledged Metro Plan as the preferred method for providing key urban facilities and services to the area within Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary. ' , , 11. Annexation to an existing city was the method for extending urban facilities and services to urbaniiable land in the poundary commission's policy administrative rule, implementing policies (I), (2), (5), arid (7). 12. The proposed annexation was the means of boundary change outlined in the Metro Plan and the boundary commission' administrative : rules for ultimately providing urban facilities and services to this territory. ' Annexation of tax lotted property fulfilled the Metro Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary: 13. 'The p..,pvsed annexation met the criteria for noncontiguous annexati()ns in the boundary commission law and the Metro Plan. 14. This request was consistent ;"",ith boundary commission policies and this standard_ Make boundary commission determinations which are consistent with acknowledged local , comprehensive plans. Assure an adeqll'ate quality and quantity of public serviCes required in the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future g,.owth. For major bounthzry changes, . there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financinlly viable. ORS 199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b), and (d) 15. The annexation area was within the urban growth boundary of the aClrnowledged Metro Plan [Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) action in 1982 and as subsequently amended]. Annexation of tax lotted property aSsisted in fulfIlling the Metro Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary, LCLGBC Staff Notes (CSP08- 14) - February 7,2008 Page N -A~9 EXH I B IT B - P17 Dale Received: II, 1{.6 i Planner: BJ , , 16. The Metro Plan recognized annexation to the City of Springfield as the highest priority for extending the minimum level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas. 17. The proposed use (church) was consistent with the policies in the Metro Plan requiring , urban levels of development within the UIban growth boundary. 18. The City of Springfield indicated that the required ~erviees outlined in Metro Plan policy #8, page )l-C-4 and defined on page V-3, were either available or can be provided in 'a timely manner. ' 19. This request was consistent with this standard. ,Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to tlie proposaL ORS 199.410(3)(d) and ~mm ' , 20.' The annexation proposal was consisient with the Metro Plan, as it was an'incremental step in implementing the long-range plan for this area. The urban growth boundary,land use~, and policies in the ,Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the metropolitan community. The proposed use was consistent with the long-range. plan for the area and fulfilled the growth policies in the Meu;o Plan and in Oregon law. ,. 21. This requ~st was consistent with this standard. Reasons: 1. The proposal was supported by the City of Springfield and the property owner. . 2. The proposal was consistent with the LCDC acknowledged Metro Plan. . 3. The services required, in the Metro Plari were either available or could be provided. in a timely manner when needed. 4. The proposal was consistent with past boundary commission actions SUl'l'v...;ng annexation to the City of Springfield. 5. The proPosal was consistent with boundary commission administrative rule policies. . . . ~ . p" LCBC: L 'lBCIS M2OO81CSP081 4SN,OOC last Sav~d: F~bruQry I. 2008 LCLGBC Staff Notes (C'SP08- J4)-February 7,2008 PageN-A-10 EXHIBIT B - P18, Date Received: Planner: .. BJ ?,l} { , 0 i Map No. IV-A-l Vicinily Map I' Annexation to Springfield (International Church of Foursquare Gospel) CSP08-]4 ill,' ~<~d,~, ,., ,c;~ J'5pritjJil 1&. tl Jq~-? (fill L- _ / , . .- "t,.. ,"IG!" -- ~~-e~-J,ol '_ (Vj, .~-jt .=:- '1In- ~~ ~_..~ JJj~ '\ i LCLGBC Staff Notes (CSPOS-14) - February 7. 2008 Page N-A-ll i -~,.,"~~~".. 1~~~:Ii;''''::'''' , ""~~~,\~.~;,,, , ,~~. ,~, ~'. ':~*,,~"i."''''~ '~_.~ .'~~~" ""'" , ~..'f...{~~!~~\\\\~~' ~~~\\~\\\,i(.~, .: '\. ~ ~\~ ~~~:'\~~''''''''''. ~~"'~~~~'<(; ".'.,~ ", h~~~~~((~~:~~\~; ":-; \. t,~~~,\,"'~~~'~''%.~~~. ~1'l:,yc;l.enBridge Way . .. .,.J...1 - L.J l~~ 1 .~'" j- , ANNEXATION AREA .1. Includes TLs 12600, 12700, 17-03-23-34 -j Owned by the International Clmrch of Foursquare Gospel BC File CSP08-14 Blackstone St -- ail '~I Ifni . f I I \ " " I I ./ , Royal " Dene Paik 1 , . i '~ luq [, .1. EXHIBIT B - P19 Map No. IV-A-2 Site Map Annexation 10 Springfield (lnlernationaJ Church of Foursquare Gospel) CSP08-]4 Date Received: S> 7:1 ~ </.. Planner: BJ '.J ~I 5 CD .~.. -', ,'. ;. ..- . .~ ' '!' ..: -. e '. ~&. .<. 'i '.,..:~) . ;~':_';h.::i-'~"'_::!!:o1iF-." :'.i ,.,. :i'/::':.:.~';' ..:,<...,' \k~~~~~ > :; :~~ :~~~~~~~~:- ~,:f;~ft~~I~ , ,,~,', :~\i;ii~' " ' '(''=::''';' '";.\> ~. . ~ J. rl 'SeAl I, ,I' ~. ..: ...: ~1Cl'" LCLGBC Staff Notes (e SP 08 -14) - February 7, 2008 Page IV-A-12 bate Receiver!' ? , ~ \. {; t Planner: BJ EXH I B IT B - P20, > . RESOLUTION NO 07-59 A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD AND REQUESTING TIIA T TIlE LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERN1vIENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE TIlE ANNEXATION WHEREAS, the City received a request to ann~x approximately 4.13 acres into the City of Springfield OIi November 22, 2006, said territory being described as follows: Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax Lots 12600 and 12700 (commonly known as 600 Hayden Bridge Way, Springiield) as generally depicted and more particularly described in Exhibit A of this Resolution. ' , WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is within the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth Boundary, and is adj acentto the City Limits; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized bY,ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A) to initiate annexation upon receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors regidtered in the territory proposed to be annexed and written consent from more than half of the owners of land in tJ1e territory proposed to be annexed, who also own more than half of, the land in the territory proposed to beannexe? and of real property therein representing more than half of the assessed value of all real property in the territory proposed to be annexed; , WHEREAS, one hundred percent of the property ownerS of the territory signed a consent to annex (Exhibit B); ~d, . . . . WHEREAS, there are no registered electors in the territory to be annexed (Exhibit C); and, ., .. , . WHEREAS, the City. Council is authgrized by Springfield Development Code 6'.070; ORS 222,111 and other , applicable Oregon Revised Statutes to initiate apnexation when the territory in the annexation proposal can be provided with the minimum key level of urban facilities and services in an orderly" and efficient manner as defined in the Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan Policy 8, Page II-B-4, and where there will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services and facilities; and, . WHEREAS, minimum level of key urban servi~es and facilities are defmed in the Eugene-Springfield Metro Area Gimeral Plan, Page V-3 as sanitary sewer service, stormwater service, solid waste management, water service, fIre and emergency medical serviCes, police protection, city-wide parks and recreation programs, electric service, land use controls, communication facilities and services,' and public schools on a district-wide basis; and, WHEREAS, the territory. proposed to be annexed can be immediately provided with a minimum level of key urban facilities and services, with the exception of City stormwater and sanitary sewer services which are available within , public streets near the property; and, WHEREAS provision: of City storm water and ~anitary sewer services has been arranged through an Anne,xation Agreement that has been negotiated with City staff and the property owner, as described in Attachment 2, Case Number LR1'2006-00030; and, WHEREAS, an Annexation Agreement has been proposed for execution by the City of Springfield and the propertY owner (International Church of the Foursquare 'Gospel operating as Springfield Faith Center) which will memorialize the Owner's commitment, agreement and obligation to meet the City's requirements for provision of the minimum level of key urban services and facilities as required for an affIrmative City recommendation for the annexation request; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forward this resolution supporting the applicant's annexation request to the Laoe County Local Government Boundary Commission when an Annexation Agreement is entered into by the City of Springfield and International Church of the Foursquare Gospel (Owner); . , EXHIBIT B - P21 " Date Received'~11.0~ \ . Planner: BJ ' NOW 'THEREFORE BASED ON TIlE FOREGOING RECITALS, :mE COMMON COUNCIL OF TIrE CITY OF SPRlNGFIELD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby recomI1lend approval of the annexation of the subject territory to the CitY by the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission, Lane CoUnty, Oregon, said t~u;.u,j being described as follows: . , Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax LotS 12600 and 12700 (commonly known as 600 Hayden Bridge Way, Springfield) as generally depicted and more particularly descnoed in Exhibit A of this Resolution. ' . Section 2; This resolution'shall take effect upon adoption by the Common Council of the City of Springfield and approval by the Mayor. Section 3: The City. Council recommends that the BoundaIy Commission approve the proposed annexation upon execution of an Annexation Agreement as described in the recitals, i: ' . Section 4: The City Manager is hereby authorized to sign the Pinal Annexation Agreement which memorializes the Owner's commitment, agreement and obligation'to meet the City's requirements for provision of the minimum level of key urban services and facilities. ' Section 5: The City' Manager shall forward this Resolution supporting the applicant's annexation request to the Lane County Local Govemment Boundary Commission. , ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 3rd day of December, 2007, by a vote of Ii for and 0 .agamst APPROvED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 3rd day, of DeceIIiber, 2007, ATrEST: \b' "/,l ___J~jY~ I M~yorU , ~~ City Recordfj "'~"'.~I','r.'1 ~ PiilP'li"IIED r:~: ~ :;>!~ i,~ ':.; til . f'\ " ~S~~~ L~" Dr,!'::: .l_l.\:z.~ L 0' OfFiCE 01' C,TY',ATTORNEY " City of Springfield. Oregon CERTIAED TRUE COPY Ii ~ofuJI'- nT."..."...TTrn...."...... .......... n""l r:n 'ai'l J;!- e'" '&~ III {! I : ___ ~~ I U)~. . k./ Blackstone Sl ir'l A\~~ '/1' ~''''l), , ./ ~'\\~\~~~ " t~~}~.~~\ I ~"~~~1~~~. >>'" " &"''\~''''''''''''.'''''''\,~''~! ,&~~'''''''''''.~ ~11~~~c,:..~B'~~'i'~~\'~'>R';', e ~~"',%\*"".",. '."''''1i~;'~'\~ ,~ ",~~~~fu.'i~'>""".', '~~":'>,'r~~~ ~~'i( :5 ;&~~\~"'\':\::" ~"'~~\~'~1 . ~~~r~'''':,~'~,~;, ..,.':'~:<K.~~:~" ~ "~';'~Vi:'~:~'~~~'~'':'\'''''''~~ ~ ~~;,~~, ,~,p,.,~:~;;~;:\~~~ ~\~ ,,,.s:,:-:'~''''~~~~';~,,,,~, "',\::,~ .. '~"~,~~"",~~,,,,,,~\'~'~~'\,~1~,.~~'_'1i~~ t ~~~v~. '~~~"'~~~~~' ~~~;~~~,~~:,~\,\.~i~~ I . . Hayden Bridge Way I -- Blackstone Sl -- \ " ~I I~I I U)I I I ;' I I Royal Dene p'arlc Cam,"dg'StV /0/ ~ r: ~ Li'ii 110 I . Nottoxnk Date Received' ?,~L D~ Planner: BJ J!.An.U>U A ~ :5 CD ~ III u' .... 10 Ci5 ~. oS '5. ~t~ i: EXHIBIT B - 1>22, . ............... : , "., .,: Ro'yaldel Lane, :;, ., .] I' '. \ \ .:' <' u~: 1 River Kn~1I W;y :,f. III ,- C :,_"." ~ ;-:.1. ... 'E tlI ..c:,. l: o '0 .0 .'; '.:",~~ Legal Description Beginning at aD iron pipe set 90 feet West and'600 feet North ofa point 2,823,48 feet (42,78 chains) Soutb oftbe Northeast corner oftbe Jacob Halstead Donation Land Claim No. 47, Notification No. 3810, in Section 23, . Township 17 Soutb;Range 3 West oftbe WillametteMeridian, ~ane County, Oregon; tbence Soutb 01" 01' IS" East 90 feet to aJ;l iron pipe; tbenee North 89" 53' West 31.5 feet to an iron pipe; tbence South aD" 01' IS" East 150,50 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 89" 53' East 127.59 feet to a point on tbe West line oftbe William Spencer Donation Land Claim Number 50 tbat is marked by an iron'pipe; thence Soutb DO" 13' 30" West 319.50 feet along last said West line to a point on tbep.orth margin of Hayden Bridge Way as said margin is offset 40.00 feet northerly by perpendicular measurement from the centerline of said road; tbence along said north margin of Hayden Bridge Way, North 89" 53' West 369)7 feet, more or less, to tbe Southeast corner of Lot 2, Block 6 of '"Royal Delle", as platted and recorded in Book 29 at Page 21 in the Plat Records of Lane County, State of Oregon; tbence North DO" 01 '15" West along the East line of said Block 6 and its Northerly extension 560 feet to an iron pipe; and thence South 89" S3' East 27S feet returning to the point of beginning and containing 4.13 acres more or less. EXHIBIT B P23 EXHIBIT B FORM #1 . Date Re~eive~:M(.d g Planner: BJ . PETITION ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD TO: LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION We, the undersigned, constitute the oWners of at least one:half of the land area of the property described in the attachment marked "Exhibit A" AND We .desire to be annexed to the City of Springfield. A map is attached marked ~"bit B," showing the affected territoI)' and its relationship to the present city llinit bo~aaries. The annexation constitutes a minor.bowidary change under the Bounda!). Commi~sion Act ~d should therefore be considered by the Boundary Commission and, after study, a Final Order should be entered by the BoUndary Commission. '.,..' . ,. . " By ~~~.. _~j ~\J~/Jk. . l1'cretary , ~ ~ ~ ,~ Lynd J. Gup~~n', As"t.' Controller' 'By DatC_T111;r ~-200~ Date Julv fi. ?nn.6 Date By Date ' MAP# 17 - ~3-..2. 3 - J'4 LOT#, r~r.. ~l') MAP# f 7 - 03 -).-3 - 3<1 LOT#- I). 76D : . , With the above signature, I am verifying that I have the authority:to . , consent to the annexation on my own behalf or on behalf of my firm, agency or trust ' s I Date Received' 1/Ju6 , "Planner: BJ EXHIBIT B P24. ""..:"';.~':-f1'{:.;;:i!::!-: ;:'}:"';,.~;;: 'i: -:'-;-. .~i-.~.-~"._':~..~ ,VERIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS I have caused a search to be made of the assessment and taxation records, Lane County Department of Assessment and Taxation (A&T), on 17-03-23-34-12600 and 17-03-23-34-12700. Those records reflect that the Intermition8.I Church of the FourSauare Gosnel are.the owners of record of the property identified by the tax lots described on the attached sheet. ' A&T is not reSponsible. for subsequent deed actiVity which may not yet be reflected on th,e A&T w~y.lterized taX roll. "~~~ Lane County Department of Assessment and Taxation 11/14/07 Date I:\A TINFO\BusinessProcess\Annexations\PropertyVerifieation fonn.doc , ",..-,,..- PETITION I.D. PEu.n.ON F()R ttI ANNEXATION TO DISTRiCTS D FORMATION OF mSTRlCT .. . SIGNATURE SHEET l:Q THE COUNTY ELE~~ONS FILING ~FFlCE~IS:rnICT OF' .cy.r--? "'- U {\',p \..\ ~ 3. , ;t 14. 15. 16, 17. lB. 19, 110. 11. 12. 113, 14, IS. . 16. 17. lB. 19. ClRCULA TOWS VERIFICATION ~ niIS VERIFICATION MUST DE SIGNED BY THE ClRCULA, TOR SHEET NUMBER THIS IS A CITY I DISTRICT PETITION. SIGNERS OF THIS PAGE MUST BE REGISTERED VOTERS IN LANE COUNTY ,ONLY. . l DATil: SIGnED ltJOIlJAYfY... U!lmElfCl: AnDRIUlI ITR~ET. NUMBER" ern' ,"AP & TAX LOT PRINT NAME , 17-D.J"~.3'3Y 1'<''-'''''' Bh ji'7-"'- ~ ',2 ~- .T..... ,~YDd qr 021\ t (' . . ~/06 Tim J. H~Rkin. ARRt. SEe. l~lO W.. Sunset ~t:e~ LUU -7/06/06 Lvnda J. Gunton. ABet. (on. nR~~l~R. ,r.A 'u (', ,,(' , '" I Pllor _lEa. OWNED OWHIE. ANNEXATION TO DISTRICTS I FORMATION OF DISTRICT PETITION ' ' I, ~print cu:ulator's name)... T r'IJA ~r c~ -..j-, C-: __ ~ _ _I hereby verify everi person who signed th.. sheet dId so In my pr~.ence a " beheve ea~n is a r,e~islered voter in the city I district. SIGNATURBOPCIRC\JLATO . . ~C-___ ~ CIRCULATOR'S ADDRESS (stret ily'andzip c~do) c::. ~?t'C>-. ,i'~ .J$.J-.R...d~' ._.- ..7 ......,-- ... c ti, , "y: o - j>;>. u .1 'l I ' ~: 1 !! ... c u ,'~ c . ~ iIJ 'Vi ~: f [ ~_. ('1 I l j ,1, ~ . f f~ ... ~ 11 ~ .Q 0 II ,:-' '. ~ I tD -I "''J' ~ 'U IE r" ~ '" Z g I,' : < -~ += '" ,~ .oj " u ,'"' .T1 :J'I +:-. .~ '. :.' ,EXHIBIT B - P26. Date Received: 1y ,1.> f .vD Planner: BJ FORM #2A CERTIFICATION OF REGISTERED VOTERS I hereby certify that ~ signatures on the attached petition are registert:d voters and reside in the area descnoed in the petition. These signatures . ~i" ~,ent not less than 50 pen:ent of the registered voters residing within the annexation or withdrawal area descnoed in this petition. ' ,..,;.";..~.l.. ..~:t'\~~ ~ .,,,,,\,,,,'\1 C~, ^ ~/\ \ . . <;> ::..,?~~,-'1'.-p~ "'-H--" \0Jv> -' "\1"\ Dep r CleIk ~ t""' I SEAL ) J Lane County, Oregon ~ ~\ .5 'to',- , /1..... ~.~ ".. ,,;,.<it' . ~~~~ ~.!1 '..~~ o~ 't- 0'_ "l-T!. ;# ~~ .:t. \ .200 -, .".~.'" Date , , Informational Attachment Date Received: Rlariner: BJ F or the proposed annexation of :104.13 acres of property located at 6,00 Hayden Bridge Way. The area is descn"bed on Lane County Assessor's Map 17--03-23-34, TL 12600 &: 12700. T?e legal description of the property follows: \". EXHIBIT ? ?US ' B - P27 ~ ;. , , BegIDning at an iron pipe set 90 feet West and 600 feet North of a j'lOint 2,823.48 feet (42.78 chains) South of the Northeast corner of the Jacob Halstead Donation Land Claim No.47, Notification No~ 3810, in Section 23, Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian; Lane County, Oregori; thence South 010 01' 15" ,East90 feetto an iron pipe; th"nce North 89. 53' West 31.5 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 00. 01' 15" East 150,50 feet to an iron pipe; thence SoutJi 89.53' East 127.59 feet to a point On the West line of the William Spencer Donation Land Claim Number 50 that is markedby an iron pipe; thence South 00.13' 3 0" 'West 319.50 feet along last said West line to a point on the north margin of Hayden Bridge Way as said margin is offset 40.00 feet northerly by pelJlendicular measurement from the centerline of said road; thence along said north margin of Hayden Bridge Way, North 89. 53' West 369.77 feet, more or less, to the Southeast corner of Lot 2; Block 6 of "Royal Delle", as platted and recorded in Book 29 at Page 21 in the Plat Records of Lane County, State ofiliegon;' thence North 00. 0 I '15" West along the East line' of said Block 6 and its Northerly extension 560 feet to an iron pipe; and thence South 89. 53' East 275 feet returning to the point of beginning and containing 4.13 acres more or , less, . Zoning , The Low DensitY Residential (LOR) zoning of the' subject property"and existing use is consistent with the Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) and the City's Development Code. Churches are listed as a Discretionary Use in the LDR District A site review permit for the church was issued by Lane County in July, 1984 and upheld by the Lane County Hearings Official in September, 1984 (Case PAI315-84), , Sanitary Sewer , The existing church is not currently connected to the city sanitary sewer system. There are three possible connection points for ,extension of sanitary sewer to the property: an existing public sanitary sewer line within Blackstone Street northeast of the property;,a public sanitary sewer ',line that extends south of Blackstone Street roughly parallel with and about 80 feet offset from the east i';ui'u,;jline of the site; and a sanitary sewer line at the intersection of Mint Meadow WayilDd Old Orchard Lane (approximately 500 feet east of the southeastern corner of the site). The public sanitary sewer lines within and extending froin Blackstone Street are'located within the City limits. However, extension of a sanitary sewer line from the intersection of Mint Meadow Way and Old Orchard Lane would'require approval of an ~~~a;~u;,u,;ali:xtension along Hayden Bridge Way. Solid Waste Management The City and Sanipac have an exclusive franchise arrangement for garbage service inside the city limits. Upon annexation, Sanipac will serve this property. , . . Water Service " Rainbow Water District is currently serving the site with water arid ,will continue to do so until the July following the completion of annexation, at which time SUB Water will be the provider. Water service to the property originates from a 6"inch water main in Hayden Bridge Way. , Electric SUB Electric is currently serving the site with power from an overhead line running north-south along the western boundary of the site. Fire and Life Safety The Fire Marshal has reviewed the application and has determined that fire and emergency services are available to this property. The building has an existing fire sprinkler system an4 there is a fire hydrant at the southeast corner of the site, ' , Police Protection Upon annexation, the area will receive police i" u,~u";on from the City of Springfield. Police protection and '~'I'u~se to priority calls can be provided to this site upon annexation consistent with service protection throughout the ~fiY: Date Received' Planner: BJ 1. ?r,!b EXHIBIT B P28. 111 ,. Parks and Recreation Programs After annexatiOli to the City of Springfield, the subject property will be within the Willamalane Park and R~~, ~~;';on District boundary. City residents receiv~ park and recreation services from the District The District operatt:s two aquatic centers, a~o=unity Center, an Adult Activity Center, and 31 parks containing a variety of outdoor recreational amenities. ,There is one park currently located in the vicinity of the annexation area; Royal , Delle, a 2,76:-acre neighborhood park at 40 I Blackstone Stretrt., Among otherJeatures, the park contains an open play area, basketball court, playground, picnic shelter and tables, and night lighting. Other nearby ,....,'-';onal opportunities include Harvest Landing and Page Park.. A complete listing ofWill.m. I.ne' s parks and programs can be found on-line at www,Willamalane,oi-g, or at 736--4044. . : . Although the site is zoned LDR, there are no occupied dwellings on the site and none are proposed. For this reason, the i" ~i'~' ~j should not generate any additional demands for park and recreation facilities. Land Use Controls , The City of Springfield Development Services Department has provided all planning and building functions for the owners of the subject i"Ui'~' ~j. The City of Springfield Development Services Department will continue to provide , land use control for the site after the annexation. Communication Facilities Qwest' and AT&T cUrrently provide co=unications in the area for cable service and an array of wireless companies provide different co=unication services. The City has no exclusive franchise arrangements with telecommunication or wireless companies. The field,is competitive and therefore guarantees a wide selection. Public Schools " , ," Public School services are available through School District 19. Page ElementarySchool is located just to the east of the subject property. As stated previously, the site does not contain any dwellings and should not generate any additional demands on the school system.' , Stonnwater Control Roof runoff is directed onto the site, and passes into a series of catch basins within the site parking lot. From the catch basin system" stormwater infiltrates' into a drywell. There are existing public .~u. =" ater facilities adjacent to the site within Hayden Bridge Way. Any future development or redevelopment on this site will require ~"".~".;aie stormwater management techniques in accordance with City standards. Approval of an extraterritorial extension is , not required to extend private stormwater lines through unincolJlorated areas to serve the site. EXHIBIT B - P29 Office of theSec:retary of State Archives Division MARY BETH HERKERT Director BILL BRADBURY 'Secreti:ry of Slate 800 Summer St NE Salem, Oregon 97310 (503) 373-lJ701 Facsimile (S03) 373-ll953 February 19, 2008, Date Received: :?,?; ( , 0 & Planner: BJ Lane County Local Government BoUndary Commission Paula L Taylor 99 East Broadway, Suite 400 Eugene OR 97401-3111 Dear Ms, Taylor: Please be'advised that we have received and ffied the following Annexation(s): Ordinance Number Our File Number Date C SP 08-14 (Springfield) EC ED 07-50 (Eugene) AN.2008-0018 AN 2008-0019 " 02/14/2008 02/14/2008 Please verify the effective date(s) for these annexations through the application of ORS i99.519 Our assigned me number(s) are included with the above information. Sincerely, dY><.,I~ 13~~ Unda Bjornstad Official Public Documents cc: Lane County Clerk ODOT /Highway Division PRC/Population Research Center Revenue Cartography.5ection , ~ ' WWWSe.rver - http://arcweb.50s.state.or.us . Internet E-mail.-reference.archi~tate.or.us Oregon Genealogy Listserv ....;. or-roots@arc:hive14.sos.5tate.or.us Office of th~ Secretary of State BILL BRADBURY Se'cretary of State Archives Division MARY BETH HERKERT Director 800Stmlmer St. NE Salem, Oregon 97310 (503) 373-0701 Facsimile (503) 373-0953 February 19, 2008 Date Received: ? 1; [, I ~ Planner: BJ Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission Paula L Taylor 99 East Broadway, Suite 400 Eugene OR 97401-3111 Dear Ms. Taylor: Please be advised that we have received and fiJed th~ following A1)nexation(s): Ordinance Number Our File Number Date C SP 08.14 (Springfield) EC ED 07-50 (Eugene) ;AN 2008-0018 AN 2008-0019 02/14/2008 02/14/2008 'Please verify the effective date(s) for these annexations through the application of ORS 199.519 ' Our assigned file number(s) are included with the aoove information. 1: Sincerely, d V\<j~ C5~J.. Linda Bjornstad' Official Public Documents cc: Lane County Clerk , ODOT/HighwayDivision ' PRC/Population Research Center Revenue Cartography Section WWWServer'-.http://arcwep.sos.state.or.us, . Internet E~mail_ -reference.archives@state.or.u5 \ Oregon Genealogy Listserv - or-roots@archive14.sos.state,or,us Meeting Date: Meeting Type: Department: .!lfaff Contact: Staff Phone No: Estimated Time: March 17,2008 Regular Meetfig Development Servic", , JUnDonovan~~ 726-3660 ~, Consent Cal ar KJP' AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Date Received: Q. '7' ,0 ~ Planner: BJ SPRINGFIELD CITY COUNCIL ITEM TITLE: ACTION REQUESTED: ISSUE STATEMENT: ATTACHMENTS: DlSCUSSION/ FINANCIAL IMPACT: RAINBOW WATERDISTRlCT WITHDRAWAL EC SP 08-14, JOURNAL NUMBER LRP2006-00030 (INTERNATIONAL ClIDRCH OF THE FOURSQUARE GOSPEL) The City Council is requested to conduct a second reading and adopt/not adopt the attached .ordinance: AN ORDINANCE WITIIDRAWlNG CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS 'INTERNATIONAL CffiJRCH OF FOURSQUARE GOSPEL, LOCATED IN NORTH SPRJNGFIELD, NORTH OF HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, EAST OF 5TIl STREET, WEST OF7th STREET AND INVOLVING APPROXIMATELY 4.13 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAX LOTS 12600 AND 12700, T17S R03W S23 MAP 34 AND OTHERWISE KNOWN AS 600 HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, SPRJNGFIELD; HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRJNGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT, Oregon Revised Statutes CORS 222.520) require that territory located in the Rainbow Water District, which is annexed to the City of Springfield, be withdrawn from that district to prevent double taxation, ORS requires withdrawal prior to March 31" of each calendar year. The owner requested annexation in order to . develop the property for urban use., The subject property was annexed to the City of Springfield effective on February 7, 2008. , Attachment I: Ordinance with Legal Description and Maps, Boundary Commission Staff Report, City Council Resolution and Notices of Annexation Adoption Legal notice was published in the Springfield News as required by ORS 222,520 and notices were posted in four public places. City Council conducted a public hearing and first reading of the ordinance or:' March 10,2008, ~ I. I . Meeting Date:' Meeting Type: Oep9rt"'ent: Staff Contact: Staff Phone No: Estimated Time: March 1 0, '2008 Special Regular Mtg Development Services Jim Donov~ 726-3660' 'B(tL 5 Minutes SPRIN GFIELD CITY COUNCIL ITEM TITLE: ACTION , REQUESTED: ISSUE STATEMENT: ATTACHMENTS: DlSCUSSIONI FINANCIAL IMPACT: RAINBOWW A TER DISTRICT WITHDRAWAL EC SP 08-14, CITY PLANNING JOURNAL NUMBERLRP2006-00030 (FOURSQUARE GOSPEL CHURCH) The City Council is requested to conduct a public hearing and first reading of the attached ordinance: AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF FOURSQUARE GOSPEL, LOCATED IN NORTH SPRINGFIELD, NORTH OF HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, EAST OF S111 STREET, WEST OF 7th STREET AND INVOLVING APPROXIMA TEL Y 4.13 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAXS LOT 12600 AND 12700, T17S R03W S23 MAP 34 AND OTHERWISE KNOWN AS 600 HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAn, SPRINGFIELD; HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT, Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 222,520) require that territory located in the Rainbow Water District, which is annexed to the City of Springfield, be withdrawn from that district to prevegt double taxatiori. ORS requires withdrawal prior to , March 31 st of each calendar year. The owner requested annexation in order to develop the property for urban use, The s~pject property was annexed to the City of Springfield effective on February 7, 2008. . Attachment I: Ordinance 'with Legal Description, Boundary Commission Staff R~port with Maps, City Council Resolution and Notices of Adoption Legal notice for tonight's public hearing w\ls published in the Register Guard newspaper as required by ORS 222.520 and notices were posted in four public places, A second reading and adoption is scheduled for March 17, 2008,