HomeMy WebLinkAboutAIS PLANNER 3/17/2008
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Date Received:
Planner: BJ
.'
!:~~
'",',
">'
r
Meeting Date:
?,11.0'l MeetingType:
:':'-';I:"",rtment:
Staff Contact:
Staff Phone No:
Estimated Time:
March 17, 2008
Regular Meeting
Development Servic"C ,
JUnDonovan~~
726-3660 ~
Consent CaI ar
SPRINGFIELD
CITY COUNCIL
ITEM TITLE:
ACTION
REQUESTED:
ISSUE
STATEMENT:
ATTACHMENTS:
DISCUSSION/
FINANCIAL
IMPACT:
RAINBOW WATERDISTRlCT WITHDRAWAL EC SP 08-14, JOURNAL
NUMBER LRP2006-00030 (INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF THE
FOURSQUARE GOSPEL)
The City Council is requested to conduct a second reading and adopt/not adopt the
attached ordinance: AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF FOURSQUARE GOSPEL, LOCATED IN
NORTH SPRINGFIELD, NORTH OF HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, EAST OF 5TH STREET,
WEST OF 7ili STREET AND INVOLVING APPROXIMATELY 4,]3 ACRES IDENTIFIED
AS TAX LOTS 12600 AND 12700, T17S R03 W S23 MAP 34 AND OTHERWISE KNOWN
AS 600 HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, SPRINGFIELD; HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT,
Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 222,520) require that territory located in the
Rainbow Water District, which is annexed to the City of Springfield, be withdrawn
from that district to prevent double taxation, ORS requires withdrawal prior to
March 31" of each calendar year. The owner requested annexation in order to
develop the property for urban use, The subject property was annexed to the City of
Springfield effective on February 7, 2008,
Attachment I: Ordinance with Legal Description and Maps, Boundary Commission
Staff Report, City Council Resolution and Notices of Annexation Adoption
Legal notice was published in the Springfield News as required by ORS 222,520
and notices were posted in four public places, City Council conducted a public
hearing and first reading ofthe ordinance on March 10, 2008,
,
'.:~
.
ORDINANCE NO.
(Special)
Date Received' 3./1.63 '
Planner: BJ
AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL
CHURCH OF FOURSQUARE GOSPEL, lOCATED IN NORTH SPRINGFIELD, NORTH OF
HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, EAST OF 5TH STREET, WEST OF 7th STREET AND INVOLVING
ApPROXIMATELY 4.13 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAXS lOT 12600 AND 12700, T17S R03W
S23 MAP 34 AND OTHERWISE KNOWN AS 600 HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, SPRINGFIELD;
HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER
DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, certain real property described below was annexed to the City of Springfield
by order of lane County local Government Boundary Commission under Boundary Commission
Number File EC SP 08-14, effective 2/7/08, as recommended in City Planning File No. lRP2006-
00030 and supported by City Council Resolution No. 07-59 (and further described in Exhibit A &
B), and . .,
WHEREAS, the property to be withdrawn is located Within the boundaries of the Rainbow
Water District, and '
WHEREAS, the City of Springfield Common Council held a public hearing and first reading
in the Springfield City Council Chambers on March 10, 2008, and a second reading and adoption
on March 17, 2008. in accordance With ORS 222.524, for the purpose of hearing any objections to
the withdrawal of the property from the public service district mentioned and there' having been no
objections raised.
'NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOllOWS:
Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the
real property described should be in the best interest Of the City of Springfield withdrawn from the
Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, insofar as the property is located therein.
Section 2: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the
'following described real property Within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District is and shall
be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, said property being
described as follows: Township 17South, Range 03West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax lots 12600,
and 12700, and commonly known as 600 Hayden Bridge Road in Springfield; as more particularly
described in Exhibit B of this ordinance, Boundary Commission File Number EC SP 08-14.
I' .
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 17h day of March 2008,
by a vote of for and against. " '
AP~ROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield thi~ 17th day of M~rch2008,
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Recorder
',-r .t',"
, '.'
~~~~_~H'~.~':':'\-'
, - .,.5L. ):::Z$ ,I O~__,
".. .'
", ,:;' ;-.j .;.
,
ATTACHMENT 1 - 1
,;
.::;..
Date ....ecelve&J..L:UJ b
Planner: BJ
"
J!.AnWU A
':WBITA :-
P1
7
, Royal
DeDe
, parle
ail
" l!!,
I' :'
'/ -~I ~I
I I
I I
J I'
j JI
~aJl
~~ '
~.!1i
l!~'
tt8
.:: '\ .-
I _____
Blackstone St
, ' '
'. -'.".
-
:.----
.' , ~
\
"
Cambridge St. ,
nr
Rciyaldel Lane "
I ": I ,1 ' ,I ~>' ';' ',:"
Al1 I \ \.. .,"'c;
~,~,,':f.II::~~~'~m,~.,II,.:,~~~,",,~,",r. I .1 \ .. ."
,~,' ') River Knoll Way :'"~,:,'!,;,',,
,,"'''t;.., ","~" ~'~ I GI
;.~_",,',,~J I~ ,,;~;~
~~'~~~~1~ ~
~~~~~~,,~~ .r:
,~,,~' ~,,,,,~':t'%c_~ Ii e f:!
p'.~~~~~ ::l0
~~:~~\;'m\\~~'\'.':\"''.\~' ''lljD'B' :!2
~",,\,.,...,\\ ,~"'''' \:""~"" 0
{~~\a~~1 ,
.,.}.~"&~~~\~..,..~,..."'.,...,"
. ....., ..",\,:.;
Hayden Bridge Way
BladGtone St'
l ~
Lii5
, ,&
, ~,
'"
~
f > Qi b
GI 0..
... :!!
- o!l
lJ) ..'
""'!i ~ ~
~
I
~ ':,i" '..
":i7;~~l
.' Notlo~ctlle
'I.'
Legal Description!
, "
Beginning at an iron pipe set 90 feet West and 600 feet North ofa POint 2,823.48 feet (42.78 chains) South of the
Northeast comer of the Jacob Ha1stead Donation Land Claim No. 47, Notification No. 3810, in Section 23,
, Township 17 South; Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, Lane County, Oregon; thence South 01" 01' IS"
East 90 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 89" 53' West3L5 feet to ~ iron pipe; thence South 00" 01' 15" East
150.50 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 89" 53' East 127.59 feet toa point on the West line of the William
Spencer Donation Land Claim Number 50 that is marked by an i!on:pipe; thence South 00" 13' 30" West 319.50
feet along last said West line, toa point on the north margin of&yd~'Bridge Way as said margin is offset 40.00
feet northerly by t'w. t'w~dicular measurement.from the centerline of Said rOlid; thence along said north margin of
, Hayden Bridge Wriy, North 89" 53' West 369.n feet, more or less, to the Southeast ,comer ofLat 2, Block 6 of
"Roya1 Delle", as platted and recorded in Book 29 at Page 21 m thePJat Records of Lane County, State of Oregon; ,
thence North 00" 01 '15" West along the East line of said Block 6,and its Northerly extension 560 feet to an iron ,
pipe; and thence South 89" 53' East 275 feet returning to the point of beginning and con~g 4.13 acres more oi:
less. '
. ATTACHMENT 1 - 2
;;
~.
-EXHIBIT B '- P1
.-
-oregon
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
;'
99 East Broadway
,Suite 400
Eugene, OR 97401-3111
(541) 682-4425
, FAX (541) 682-2635
. Date Received: 8. 11.0& .
, Planner: BJ
February 13, 2008
Ms. Amy Sowa, Recorder
City of Springfield
2255thStreet
Springfield, Oregon 97477.
Dear Ms. Sowa:
, The enclosed final order has been enacted by the Lane ,County Local Government Boundary
Commission and is fOlwarded in conformance with ORS 199.505. .
"
Final Order 1332 (C SP 08 - 14) anneXing territory to the City of Springfield
(International Church of Foursquare Gospel)
!'
Please acknowledge receipt of this final order.
Sincerely, '
G>~~:J~
Paula L Taylor
Executive Officer
Em:losures "
cc: ' lj)ternatiollal Church of Foutsquare Gospel
Rainbow Water and Fire District
WillamaIane' Park and Recreation District
LCBC:LCOG: L'VJC\FOL\PHI2tJOIN:SPOBU FOLDOC
WI SaWd: F.bruary 1/.2008
'ATTACHMENT 1 - 3
, ,-
EXHIBIT B - P2
:
- ~
'LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDAA;yt€O~ii:";'d8~jh{'1.o~
Planner: BJ
FINAL ORDER 1332
Approved: February 7, 2008
Effective: February 7, 2008
( File C SP 08 - 14
( 'In the Matter of Annexing Territory
(To the City of Springfield '
- Legal Description Attached as Exhibit A "
,
WHEREAS, Resolution 07-59 by the City of Springfield was filed on December 31,
2007-in accordance with ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A}-for annexation .of territory to the City of
Springfield, described in attached Exhibit A and shown on attached map Exhibit B; and,
WHEREAS, the commission duly publisJiCd notice" of the public hearing in accordance.
with ORS 199.463 and in accordance with the rules of the commission and ORS 199.452(1),
conducted a public hearing on February 7,2008; and,
,
I
WHEREAS, on the basis of the study of ihe proposal, which considered economic,
demographic, and sociological trends and physical 'development of the land including the
applicable comprehensive plan, and of the public hearing, the commission approved the proposal
and made the fmdings and reasons attached as Exhibit C.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED: That the area described be a part of the City of
Springfield.
ORDERED BY THE LANE COUNTY LOCAl1' GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY
COMMISSION TIllS 7th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2008. .
01'1~
ClaY-MY;) Chair
2-Jn..,lnP
Date
NOTE: The subject territory is within the Rainbow Water arid FIre District and will remain in the
district until withdrawn through separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS
222.
In acc~rdance with ORS 1995l0(2)(c), the territory is hereby a part of the Lane County Metropolitan
Wastewater Service District and Willamalane Park and Recreation District.
!! .
pI: LCBC: 1.. 'lBC\FOL\PH\2OO81CSPOBU FO,DOC
Uut Saved: February 7.2008
ATTACHMENT 1 - 4
EXHIBIT B - P3
Date Received:--3JJ 0 (
Planner: BJ
EXHffiIT A,
, f
Beg at an iron pipe set 90.00 ft W and 600.00 ft N of apt 2,823.48 ft (42.78 ch) S of the NE cor
of the Jacob Halstead DLCNo. 47, Notification No. 3810,523 Tl7S R03W WM, Lane County,
Oregon; ,
th SoooO l' l5"E 90.00 ft to an iron pipe;
th N89053:W 31.S0 ft to an !ron pipe;
th S(JOoOl' l5"E 150.50 ft to an iron pipe;
th S89053'E 127.59 ft to a pIon the W Ii of.the William SpencerDLC No. 50 that is marked by
an iron pipe; , "
,11
,th Sooo13'30''W 319.50 ft alg sd W Ii to a pIon the N niar of Hayden BridgeWay, sd mar is
, offset 40.00 ft Nly by perpendicular measurement fr thec/li'of sd rd; ,
th alg. sd N mar N89053''W 369.77 ft mil to the SE cor Lot 2, Block 6 of Royal Delle, as platted
, and recorded in Bk 29 Pg 21 LCOPR, Lane County, Orego?;
th NoooOl' l5''W alg the E Ii of sd Block 6 and its Nly extension 560.00 ft to an iron pipe;
. . .: -. !' .
th S89053'E 275.00 ft to the POB, all in Lane County, Oregon.
, ,
, !
LCBC:LCOG: L:1JJ0LEGAL\2OO1I\CSPOB14 LGLCXX
wI Sawd: F.b,..ry II. 2008
"
Filial Oider 1332
CSP08-14
Page 1 of 1
~TTACHMENT 1 -5
EXHmIT B
EXH IB IT B
Date Received:.2.J.1, 0 ~
Planfler: BJ
P4
:
I .. ".......
I . '~l'
-
II
, l!!
-' I -
Blackstone St en
-- 5
oml CD .:"
\ /. ~I
fal
, Royal I
DeDe
Pa1ff I
: I
I
Cambridge St
I~f
.L I, L L_I .1
ANNEXATION AREA
I Includes TI.s 12600, 12700,17-03-23-34
~ Owned by the International Olurch
of FomsquareGospel
BC FileC SPOS-14
~
T
I
!
ri
,'5~1
~~"'I'\
'I'.
Final Order 1332
CSP08-l4
Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT 1 - 6
EXHIBIT B P5
:
EXHffirr C
Date Received: ?;f1ob
Planner: BJ
Findinl!s:
I. Th.is proposal' was ,initiated with the boundary commission by the City of Springfield
after receiving consents from the property owner on December 31, 2007, in accordance
withORS 199,490(2)(a)(B). ,The proposal was f9und to be a valid filing under OAR
191-006. ,;
2. The proposed annexation, as submitted, included tWo tax lots (T17S R03W S23 Map 34
tax lots 12600 and 12700) comprising approximately 4.13 acres and was owned by the
International Church of Foursquare GospeL The lInnexation area was developed with a
church facilitY and was not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield.
. t .
3. The land use designation for the annexation ',area was low-density residential in the
Eugene~Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plap (Metro Plan).
. 4. The annexation area was zoned lDRIUF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe,
in Lane County. After the annexation effective ,date, the I',vl'".~y was rezoned lDR
consistent with the land use designation.
Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the
effects of the boundary change on other units of g~vemment. ORS 199.410(l)(b) and
199.410(3)(c)
5. The boundary cornxnissionheld a public hearlng',on February 7, 2008. Notice of the
public hearing was given in accordance with ORS 199provisions. All interested parties
. . l .
were gIven a reasonable opportunity to be heard., ' '
6. After annexation to' Springfield, the annexation area would be withdrawn from the
Rainbow Water and Ere District. There would be some fmancial impact on the district
because it derives its water revenue from user fees and the annexation area was
developed with a church. The annexation area would be withdrawn from the district
through separate proCeedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. On
behalf of the City ofSprin~eld, the Springfield Utility Board provided service directly
to the annexation area. "
7. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area :was annexed automatically to the
Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District .in accordance with ORS
199.510(2)(c).
8. Upon the effective date of the annexation; the area was annexed automatically to the
Willamalane Parks and Recreation District in accordance with ORS 199.51O(2)(c).
9. This request was consistent with this standard.
Fmal Order 1332
CSP08-l4
Page 1 of 3
ATTACHMENT 1 - 7
:
,. -.
E){H I BIT B
P6
Date Received' ~'1 00
" , 1 ' . '
C id h ',-, '[ d," .'. nd' ad' ' if 10' alPlanner. BJb --'-' b
ons er t e oruer y eternllnation a gustment 0 ,c government oUlwunes to est
meet the ,needs of Lane County, and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where
intergovernmentaIoptions are identified and make decisipns based on 'the most effective long-
range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a)
and (e)
10. Annexation to the City of Springfield was identified in the acknowledged Metro Plan as
the preferred method for providing key urban facilities and services to the area within
Springfield'~ portion of the urban growth boundary~
1 L Annexation to an existing city was the method for extending urban facilities and services
to urbanizable land in the boundary commission's policy administrative rule, _.
. implementing policies (1), (2), (5), and (7).
12.
, ,
The l'>vyvsed annexation was the means of boundary change outlined in the Metro Plan
and the boundary commission administrative rules, for ultimately providing urban
facilities' and services to this territory. Annexation of tax lotted y>vY""i fulfilled the
Metro Plan policies of annexing outto the urban growth boundary.
,
13. The l'>vyvsed annexation met the criteria for noncontiguous annexations in the boundary
commission law and the Metro Plan. "
'14. This request was consistent with boundary commis~ion poliCies 'and this standard.
Make boundary commission determinations which are I, c~~sistent with acknowledged local
comprehensivepwns. 'Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in
the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future 'growth. For major bountlm-y changes,
there must be assurance that the proposed unit of go~ernment' is fi1Ul1lcially viable. ORS
199.410(1)(d), 199.41~(3)(b), and (d) ,
15.
16. ,
17.
18.
The annexationaiea was within the urban growth boundary of the acknowledged Metro
Plan [Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) action in 1982 and as
subsequently: amended]. Annexation of taX lotted'~roperty assisted in fulfilling the Metro
Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth bpundary.'
, ,
, ,
.: ~~ .
The Metro Plan recognized annexation to the City; of Springfield as the highest priority
for extending the minimum le~el of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas.
The l'>~y';sed use (church) was con'siste~t with the policies in the Metro Plan requiring
urban levels of development within the urban growth bl,lundary., ,
The City of Springfield indicated that. the required services outlined in Metro Plan policy
, #8~ pagell-C-4 and defmed on page V-3, were either available or can be provided in a
timely manner. " , ' "
Fmal Order 1332
C SP 08 -: 14
Page 2 of 3
ATTACHMENT 1 8
EXH I B IT B - P7
,
19" This request was consistent with this standard.
Date Received' 3- ( 10S
- Planner: BJ
Consider the comprehenrive plan's economic, demographic, and ,soCiological trends and
projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposal. ORS 199.410(3)(d) and
199.462(1) .
.? .
20.' The annexation proposal'was consistent with the Metro Plan, as it was an incremental
step in implementing the long_range plan for this area. The urban growth boundary, land
uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the
metropolitan community. The proposed use was consistent with the long-range plan for
the area and fulfilled the growth policies in the Metj-o Plan and in Oregon law.
21. This request was consistent with this standard.
Reasons:
,
1. The proposal was supported by the City of Springfield and the property owner.
2. ' The proposal was consistent with the LCDC acknowledged Metro Plan.
3, Th~ services required in the Metro Plan were either available or could be provided in a
timely manner when needed.
I
, 4. ,The proposal was consistent with past boundary commission actions supporting
annexation to the City of Springfield.
5. The proposal was consistent with boUndary coinmission administrative rule policies.
LCBC:LCOG: L:IBCV'OLIEX02!I08ICSl'08U EXC,DOC
1Ast Sawd: F.bnmry JI. 2008
Fmal Order 1332
C SP 08:'" 14
Page 3 of3
ATTACHMENT 1- 9
.
EXHIBIT B - P8
STAFF NOTES
Date Received:
,Planner: BJ
3,{1.oi
LANE 'cOUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
(99Eas1 Broadway, s..te 400. Eugene. OR 97401-3111)
Eugene City HaD CounciI 0IamIl<:.
m P=I s...... Eugene
Fcbnwy 1, 2008
7:00p.m.
, I,
Annexation of Territorv to the City of Sorinl!field (International Church of Foursouare Gosoe))
NA BC File C SP 08 -14
Initiated by Resolution 07-59 by the City of Springfield with 'consents from y,vl^'Hf
owners
Action under ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A) of the boundary tOmmission law
Received De~mber 31. 2007
Action to be taken by March 30. 2008
Descrintion ,
The annexation area includes two tax lots located in' east ,Springfield, north of Hayden
, Bridge Way, east of 5th Street, south of Blackstone Street, and west of Old
Orchard Lane .
, Property oWne~: International Church of Foursquare 'Gospel (600 Haydcu Bridge Way. Spriugfidd)
Tax lots: 12600 3I]d 12700, T17S R03W S23 Map' 34
Acres::!: 4.13
Estimate of existing population: 0
Existing land use: Church and related facilities, vacant
Existing zoning in Lane County: LDR\UF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe
overlay, '
Applicable comprehensive plan: Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan
'(acknowledged in August 1982 and has been subsequently amended)
Existing public services to the property: Police (Qregon State Police. Lane County
Sheriff),. schools (Springfield School District 19), roads (Lane County, City of
Springfield)"frre (Rainbow Water and Fire District contracting with the City of
Springfield), water ~bow Water and FrreDistrict)
"
Reason for Annexation :'
The property owner requested aimexation to prepare the site for additional church facility'
development. The Eugene-Springfield M";'~1""litan Area General Plan requires
P' VI^" ..ies to annex in order to receive urban services. ,
" .
Notice ,
., As required by ORS 199.463(1), notice of a .public hearing must be pU9lished in a
newspaper of general ciicuIation not more than 25 days nor less than 15 days before the
], r. -l'~'J owner means the owner of the tide of real Y' Vl'~./ or the contract purchaser of real property as shown on
the last aVailable complete assessment roll. ORS 199.415(13) ,
LCLGBC Staff Notes (e SP. Os - ]4) - February 7, 2"008
PageN-A-I , ATTACHMENT 1 - 10
"
EXHIBIT B
Date Received' :;.11.{)g
Planner: BJ
P9
hearing. In this Glse, notice of the public hearing was advertised in The Eugene
Register-Guard on 17, 2008. A sec.ond n.otice m,ay be published in a newspaper .of
general circulation .or notice .of the hearing may beimailed t.o each .owner of land in the
'affected territory,2 as desCTI'bed in the petiti.on? not m.ore than 15 days before the hearing.
In. this,Glse, notice of the hearing was sent trJ the affected property owner (Tim Baskin '
and Lynda Gupton, on behalf of the Intemational Glurch of Foursquare Gospe~' owner
of the property proposed for annexation) on January 25, 2008. The ,final n.otice required
by the b.oundary cammissi.on law is the pasting of a notice of the public hearing in ,.the
affected city, district, .or territary at least 15 days bef.ore the hearing. In this case, notice
of the public hearing.was posted in the area of tfie annexation, at the Springfield dty
ha/~ and at the l.iJne County courthouse on January 23, 2008.
. , , i
In canformance with OAR 191-005-0065(3), these; staff notes, are inw.pu."ted as part .of the
recard of the b.oundary cammissianpublic hearing .of Febru~ 7, 2008,
This annexation pr.oposal was fIled with the b.oundary co,mmissian in accordance with ORS
1 99.490(2)(a)(A), initiated by Resolution N.o. 07-59 by the City .of Springfield. Prior t.o initiating
the annexatian, the City .of Springfield received written cansent from the,p."p...;j .owner (Tim
Baskin and Lynda Guptan, an behalf .of the Internati.onal Church of FDursquare Gaspel)
requesting, annexatian. At' the time the annexati.on was 'initiated by the city, there ,were n.o
electars4 registered within the annexatian area. The statut.ory provision ta receive cansents from
.owners is met.
The p.vpvsal was filed with the baundary cammissi.on an December 31, 2007, and b.oundary
cammissi.on actian inust ac:cur by March 24, 2008 (9(}'day statutory time frilIne)~If the
annexatian, is "pp.v.ed by the boundary commission an February 7,' 2009, it will become
effective upan passage .of the final .order. ~
The proposed annexation area includes tw.o tax lats (refer io" Maps No. N -A-l and N-A-2). The
annexatianarea is currently devel.oped with .one church an' site. Annexation' t.o Springfield will
a).l.oW additional church devel.opment t.o occur. ' , '
,
The annexation area'is nat cantiguous t.o the main body .of the City .of Springfield. It is, adjacent
t.o ather nancantiguous 'portians .of the city. The urban, growth boundary (UGB) is located
approximately 600 feet narth ,.of the,annexatian area. , Th~ annexatian area is designated l.ow-
density residential in the Eugene-Springfield MetroP.olitan Area General Plan (Meuo Plan) and is
zaned LDR\UF, lawcdensity residential with urbanizing fringe overlay, in Lane County. Upon
the effective date .of the annexatian, the UF .overlay will autamatically be rem.oved and the
,
annexed p.up..uies will be zaned cansistent with the plan designatian. 'd
2 Affected territory me;."s the t~;;'_J descn'bed in the petition. ORS 199.415(3) , , "
3 Petition means the documents _......:.wJ to initiate a boUlldary change arid includes, but is not limited to, an initiating
document, legal description, cadastral maps, and information form. ORS 199.415(14), ORS 199.490(4), and OAR '
191~3) :
. · Elector means an individual registered to vote at an address within the 3frected territory. ORS 199.490(1) and (5)
and ORS 199505 ' . " , "
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C sp 08 -14) - February 7, 2008
Page N -A-2 "
ATTACHMENT 1 - 11
.
.
EXHIBIT B - P10
Date Received: ~'{1 0 &
Planner: BJ
The annexation was initiated by the City of Springfield on,December 3, 2007. An Annexation
Agreement outlining the agreements between the city and ~e owner for the provision of urban
services andfmancingresponsibility has been fully executed for the annexation area.
BOUNDARY COMMISSION REFERRALS,
. r. ,"
Boundary commission referrills were sent to the Lane County Land Management Division, Lane
County Environmental Health Division, Lane County Board of Commissioners, and 'Rainbow
Water and Fire District.
No referral responses were received as of January 30, 2008. j,
BOUNDARY COMMISSION STANDARDS. STAFF ANALYSIS,
,
,
In this section of the staff notes, each applicable boundarY commission standard is addressed.
These standards are derived from ORS 199 and the boun4arY commission's policy administrative
rule (OAR 191, Division 30). ' ,
Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. ConSider the
effects of the boundary change on other units of governments. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and
199.410(3)(c)
This annexation request was fIled in accordance with provisions in ORS 199 and was detennined
, to be a valid filing in accordance with OAR 191-006 (adopted administrative rule on boundary
corruirission filing requirements)_ The item ,was placed on', the boundary commission's agenda
for February 7, 2008. Notice of the boundary commission's ,public hearing has been published in
accordance with Oregon law.' Any person may attend and will be given a reasonable opportunity
to be heard.
. ii
The proposed annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District. The fire district
contracts with the City of Springfield for fire services withip its boundaries. Upon the effective
date of the annexation, the annexation area will be automati~ally withdrawn from the fire district
-,' '
in accordance with ORS 199.51O(2){a) and the 'city., will p'rovirle fire services directly to the
annexed property.
The Metro Plan identifies the city as the ultimate provider of urban services within the UGB.
Policy #18, page n-C-6, in the Metro Plan recognizes that as annexations to the city occur,
existing special service'districts within the UGB will be dissolved. The continued annexation of
properties to the City of Springfield is consistent with the Metro Plan, which likely will result in
the elimination of several special districts within the urbanizable area.
Upon annexation, the area will be an.nexed automatically 'into the Lane County Metropolitan
Wastewater Service District [ORS 199.51O(2){c)]. This sIJ?:ial district was fonned to provide
the financing for the regional wastewater treatment plant ~erving wastewater users within the
cities of Eugene and Springfield and other users within the urbanizable area. '
LCLGBC Staff Notes (CSPOS-,J4) -February 7, 2008
Page N-A-3 '
ATTACHMENT 1 - 12
~
[iDle Received:
Planner: BJ
EXHIBIT B - P11
3,11. or
'-.
Upon annexation, the area will be annexed automatically into the Williunalane Parle and
Recreation District, which provides park and recreation facilities and services to territory within
the City of Springfield.
This requeSt is consistent with this standard. '
"
Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best
meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where
intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long-
,range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.41,0(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a)
and (e) ,
t
The area in this annexation proposal is located within the acknowledged UGB of the Metro Plan.
Territory within the UGB ultimately will be within the CitypfSpringfield. Springfield is the unit
of government identified in the Metro Plan to provide urban services to territory in this area. The
y,uyused annexation is not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield.
Noncontiguous annexations are allowed by state annexation law and provided for in the Metro
Plan if certain criteria are met. The Metro Plan policY for noncontiguous annexation (policy #12,
page TI-C-5) requires that noncontiguous annexations meet the following criteria:
I '
a The area to be annexed will be provided urban service(s), which is (are) desired
immediately by the residents/property owners.
b. The area to be annexed can be serviced (~ith a minimum level of services; as
directed in the Metro Plan) ilia timely and c;ost-efficient manner and is a logical
extension of the city's service delivery syste~.
c, The annexation p' upusal is a~u=yanied bY,support within the area p' uyuoed for
annexation from the owners of at least half the land area in the atI:ected territory.
This annexation 'is consistent with boundary commission administrative rule implementing
policies (1), (2), (5), and (7) which recognize annexation to an existing city as the preferred
method of servicing urbanizable land! '
(l) This policy recognizes cities as the logical ,providers of urban levels of service
within urban growth boundaries when consistent with the comprehensive plan.
"
(2) This policy expresses the commission's preference for providing urban services
through' annexation to a city in order to p~vide urban services to urbanizable
lands.
(5) This policy encourages the provision of urban levels of service within urban
growth boundaries.
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C sp 08 - 14) --' February 7, 2008
Page N -A-4
ATTACHMENT 1 - 13
;;.
"'---,
EXHIBIT B - P12
Date Received' 3,/1bt
Planner:, BJ
(7) TIris policy'eltpresses the commission's p,,,f~'''ilCe for annexation to an existing
city 'over all other alt~atives as a means of extending services to urbanizable
lands.
, Implementing policy (3) recognizes that in order to meet the'Iong-term objectives of annexing
, , ,
out to'an acknowledged urban growth boundary, short-tenp boundaries are created which are
logical within the context of the future service boundary. ID the long term territory within this
geographic area will be, annexed to Springfield. Annexation to the city fulfills the policies
adopted in the Metro Plan of annexing out to the urban growth boundary.
,
. .
TIris proposal to annex territory to the City of Springfield is consistent with boundary
commission policies and this standard.
I . ,
Make boutukuy commission determinations, whkh are consistent with acknowledged local
comptehensiveplans. Assure an adequate quality and qulf7ltUy ofpublk services required in '
the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future growth. For major boundary changes,
there must be assurance thai 'the proposed unit of government is financially viable. ORS
199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b) arid (d) ,",
The p,ut'v.al is within. the Metro Plan urban growth ::boundary. The Metro Plan was
acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) in August 1982
and has been Subsequently amended. The Metro Plan rricognizes annexation as the highest
priority for extending the minimum level of key urban facili~es and services to urbanizable areas
(policies #8 and #10, page ll-C-4) andn:cognizes that ultin,1~ely,.all territory within the urban
growth boundary will be ann,exed to an existing city (policy #16, page ll-cC-6).
,
The annexation area is currently designated low-density n;sidential in. the Metro Plan. If the
annexation is approved, the taX lotted properties will be rezc;med to a LOR, a city zoning district
'consistent with the plan designation. , .
The annexation ,area will take advantage of urbap seryice :lIelivery systems that are already in
pla~e to serve this area The following facilities and services are either available or can be
extended to 'this annexation area:
Water -The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Frre District. ,The city indicates
there is existing 6-inc1J water line located in Hayden Bridge Way. Service to new development
. within the annexation area can be provided by this line. ., Following annexation, the City of
SpringfiCld will withdraw the P,vt'".;y frolIl the Rainbow Water and Fire District in accordance
with ORS 222 and the Springfield Utility Board (SUB) will provide services to the annexation
area. An intergovenimental a&,""went between the 'water :district and SUB and state law w1l1
determine the orderly transition of services and finances between the two service providers.
, r
Electricitv - Springfield Utility Board (SUB) provides electric service to developed 1""1''"' "':es in
this area of south Springfield. Ne:-v development in the annexationarea will be served by SUB.
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C SP 08:'14) - February 7, 2008
Page IV -A-S '
ATTACHMENT 1.:- 14
.
.
EXHIBIT B - P13
Date Received: ., ,11, o<{
Planner: BJ
Police services - Springfield staff indicates that Police, currently provide service to other
.I',u.I'"..ies in this general area already inside'the city. After annexation, this t',ul'usal area will
receive police services on an equal basis with .I'~u.l'''Hies inside the city. Mill annexations and
development in this area will increase the efficiency of service delivery to this area.
FIre and emer!!'encv services - Fue protection is, currently provided to the annexation area by the
Rainbow Water andFJre District. This special district contracts with the City of Springfield for
fue services to territory within the district's boundaries. Upon annexation, the annexing area will
be withdrawn from the fue district, and Springfield will provide fue services directly to the
annexation area. Springfield'fue stations are'located near Pheasant Avenue and Hayden Bridge
, Way, S 47tb Street and Milin Street, and S 68th Street and Mi!in Street. ,
,
Emergency medical,transport (ambulance) services are provided on a regional basis by Eugene.
Sprulgfield, and Lane Rural FirelRescue to central Lane ~'County. The annexation area wip
continue to receive this se""ic~ consistent with the adopted ,ambulance service area (ASA) plan.
Mutual aid a6'"",,,,.;:nts have been adopted by the three regioral ASA providers to provide backup
coverage for each other's jurisdictions.
Parks and recreation - Upon' annexation area to the City of Springfield, the annexing area will
also be annexed to the Willamalane Park and Recreation District. Park and recreation services
"
are provided to the City of Springfield by the park district." Indoor recreation facilities, such ,as
the Willamalane Park Swim Center, Lively :Pazk Swim Center, Memorial Building Community
Center, and Willamalane Adult Activity Center will be available to residents as new development
occurs. The park district offers various after-school and other programs for children at schools
and parks throughout the community. Also availabk,are. pathways and several categories of
parks, including w~"unity parks, sports parks. special use,parks, and natural area parks. There
is one park currently located in the vicinity of the annex~tion a<ea. Royal Delle, a 2.76-acre
neighborhood park on Blackstone Street. Other nearby recreational V.l't'v. ,unities include
Harvest Landing and Page Pazk. '
Schools - Springfield School District 19 serves this area. Existing schools-Guy Lee elementary.
Hamlin and Springfield high--serve this neighborhood; however, the anne,xation area does not
contain any residential dwellings and should not generate any additional demands on the school
system. "
Wastewater - Springfield staff indicated tat the existing churCh within the ann~xation area is not
currently connected to the city wastewater system. There are three possible connection points for
extension of wastewater service to the annexation area: an e;xisting 6-inch line within Blackstone
Street northeast of the annexation area; an 8-inch line that extends south of Blackstone Street
roughly parallel with and about 80 feet offset from the easft',vl'''.;J line of the annexation area;
and an 8-mch' line at the intersection of Mint Meadow Way and Old Orchard Lane
(apProximately 500 feet east of the south'eastem comer df the annexation area). The public
wastewater lines within and extending from Blackstone Street are located within the city limitS.
However, extension of a wastewater line from the inte~tion of Mint Meadow Way and Old
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C SPQ8 - ]4) - February 7.2008
Page N-A-6
ATTACHMENT 1 - 15
~
'1_.
.I
EXHIBIT- B - P1,4
!:J;u!e Received: ~,11,o~
Planner: BJ
"-
Orchard Lane along Hayden Bridge Way woUld be outside the city limits until the right~f"way is
annexed. ','
Upon the annexation effective date, the area will be annexed automatically to the Lane County
Metropolitan Wastewater Service District [ORS 199.5IO(2)(c)]. ,
~ .. ,
Stormwater - Springfield staff indicated that roof runoff is lfuectedonto the site and passes into a
series of catch basins within the site parking lot. From the catch basin system, stormwater
infIltrates into a drywell. There is an existing 18-inch stonD-\vater line adjacent to the annexation
area within Hayden Bridge Way. Approval from Lane County is needed before connection to
this system may occur, Any further development or redevelopment in the annexation area will
require "yy.vy.:ate stOnDwater management techniques.in accordance with city standards.
I:
Streets - The annexation, area abuts Hayden Bridge Way on its south side, which is fully
L.uyw.ed with curb and gUtter, pavement, sidewalks, and street lights. An interconnected
transportation system will be required in order to provide atcess and a transportation system for
the provision of fIre and life safety services to and from the annexing properties. Hayden Bridge
. '. I
Way is not located within the Springfield city limits_
,
Solid waste manal?ement - Private firms' and individuals co~lect and trimsport solid waste to the
Lane County administered landJill.
Communication facilities - Various providerS offer both', wire and wireless communication
services in the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. Existing providers and those entering the
market have the capability to provide service to future development inthis area
, . I.
, 'Land use controls, - The ywy"..j is within Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary.
Through an intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and the City of Springfield, the
city already has planning, and building jurisdiction for this '.I',v.l'".;j. The city will continue to
'administer laild use controls after annexation.
The minimum level of key urban facilities and services, as defined on page V-3 of the Metro '
Plan, are either inimediately available or can be provided within a reasonable future time frame
as needed. This request is consistent, with this standard.
Consider the comprehensive plan's :economic, demographic, and SOCiological trends and
projections and,its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposaL ORS 199.410(3)(d) and
199.462(1) "
The annex.alion proposal is consistent with the Metro Plan, as it is an incremental step in
implementing the long-range plan for this ,area. The urban growth boundary, land uses, and
policies in the ~etro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the m"uvyvlitan
community. The existing and ....v.l'vsed uses are consistent ;.vith the long-range plan for the area
. and WIll fulfill the growth policies in the Metro Plan and in Oregon law.
LCLGBC Staff Notes Ie sp 08 -14) - February 7, 2008
PageIV-A-7
ATTACHMENT 1 - 16'
.
, "...-"
EXHIBIT B - P15
Date Received:
'Thi . '.. ' ': "th!hi li d .., daidP-lanner: BJ
s request IS consIstent WI s oun ary comnussIon stan .
, .
DonA
STAFF RECOMMENDA TI(l!.'J
The boundary commissio~ '.staff recommends that the ;,.v,t'v.ed annexation to the City of
Springfield (Be File C SP 08 - 14) be approved as submitted based on the following fIndings
and reasons., ' , '
The fIiIdings an: organized to respond, to boundary commi~sion standards outlined in ORS ,199,
the boundary comp:rission law, The following fmdings and reasons are based on "1',t'.v..J of the
request as submitted. If the boundary commission modifies or denies the l',vl'vsaI, the fmdings
and reasons would need to be adjusted. -, - ,
Findin!!s: ,
I. This 1" Vl'vsal was initiated with the boundary colIlIriission by the City of Springfield after
receiving consents from the property owner on December 31,2007, in accordance with
ORS 199,490(2)(a)(B). The proposal was found to be a valid fIling under OAR 191-006.
. I
2. Theproposed annexation, as submitted, included tWo tax lots (f17S R03W S23 Map 34
tax lots 12600 andOl27oo) comprising ",t',t',v,Jrnately 4.13 acres and was owned by the
International Church of Foursquare Gospel. The annexation area was developed with a
church facility and was not contiguous to ihe niain body of the City of Springfield.
3. The land use designation for the annexation, area was low-density residential in the
Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan :(Metro Plan).
4. The annexation area was zoned !DRIUF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe,
in Larie County, Mter the annexation effective date, the property was rezoned !DR
consistent with t1ie land use designation. " Ii ' ,
Provide an impartial fomm jor resolution of Weal jurisdictional qu~stions. Consider the
"
effects of the boundmy change on other units of government. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and
199.410(3)(c),
5. The boundary commission held a public hearing 9n February 7, 2008. Notice of the
'public hearing was given in accordance with ORS 199 provisions. All interested parties
were given a reasonable opportunity io be heard.'
6. Mter annexation to 'Springfield, the' annexation area would be withdrawn from the
Rainbow Water and Fire District. There would be 'Some fInancial impact on the district
because it derives its water revenue from user fees '311d the annexation area was developed
'with a church.' The annexation area would be ~thdrawn from the district through
separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. On behalf
LCLGBCStaffNotes(CSP08_14) -February 7; 2008
Page N-A-8
ATTACHMENT 1 .:.., 17
, ~
'-:-e
d,','? ~7"Cei~e~~ I ~~(~,/~ - P16
~:;i~iiq0t': BJ
of the City of Springfield, the Springfield Utility Board provided service directly to the
annexation area.
7. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed autl;)matically to the Lane
CountyM,,~vpulitan Wastewater Service District in accordance with ORS 199.510(2)(c).
'.. "I
8. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed automatically to the
Willamalane Parks and Recreation District in accordance with ORS 199.51O(2)(c).
9. This request was consistent with this standard.
Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best
meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where
'intergovernmental options are identified and make decisiolls based on the most effective long-
range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.4.10(2), and 199.410(3)(a)
, and(e) '"
10. Annexation to the City of Springfield was identified in the acknowledged Metro Plan as
. t .
the preferred method for providing key urban facilipes and services to the area within
Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary. :' '
11. Annexation to'an existing city was the method for eJl:tending urban facilities and services
to urbanizable land in the boundary commission's policy administrative rule,
implementing policies (l), (2), (5), and (7).
12. ' ' The proposed annexation was the means of boundary change outlined in the Metro Plan
and the bouridary commission administrative' rules for ultimately providing urban
facilities and Services to this territory. ' Annexation of tax lotted l',vl''-';j fulfIlled the
Metro Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary:
13. The l',vl'vsed anneXation met the criteria for noncontiguous annexations in the boundary
,commission law and the Metro Plan. .
14. This.request was consistent w,ith boundary, commission policies and this standard.
Make boundary commission determinations which are ~onsistent with acknowledged local
, comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in,
the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future growth. For major boundary changes,
there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financially viable. ORS
199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b); and (d)
15. 'The annexation area was within' the urban' growth boundary of the acknowledged Metro
Plan [Land Conservation and Development Commi~sion (LCDC) action in 1982 and as
subsequently amended]. Annexation of tax lotted I'W.l'''Hj assisted in fulfIlling the Metro
Plan policies of annexing out to the urpan growth boupdaryc
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C SP 08 - 14)- February 7, 2008
Page N-A-9
ATTACHMENT 1 -18
,
. EXHIBIT B - P17
Date Received: 1;.116 &
Planner: 'BJ '
16. The Metro Plan recognized annexation to ihe. City of Springfield as the highest priority
for extending the miniinumJevel ofkey urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas.
, .
---'
17. The proposed use (church) was consistent with thepolides in the Metro Plan requiring
urban levels of development within the urban growtli boundary.
18. The City of Springfield indicated that the required ~rvices outlined in Metro Plan policy
#8, page TI-C-4 and defined on page V-3, were eitIler available or can be provided in a
timely manner.
19. This request was consistent with this standard.
Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and
projections and its environmental policies, ,pertinent to ~Jie proposal. ORS 199.410(3)(d) and
199.462(1)
20. The annexation proposal was consistent with the l'VIetio Plan, as it was an incremental
step in implementing thelong"range plan for this area. The urban growth boundary, land
uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were develoPed to meet the future needs of the
m-.uupulitan community. The y,v!,_sed use was consistent with the long-range plan for
the area and fulfilled the growth policies in the Metro Plan and in Oregon law.
, ,
21. This request was consistent with this standard.
Reasons:
1. The !'. u!'usal was supported by the City of Springfield and the property owner.
"
2. The proposal was consistent with the LCDC acknowledged Metro Plan.
3. The services required in the Metro Plan were either available or could be provided in a
timely manner when needed. ' ,
4. 'The proposal, was consistent with, past boundarycornrnission actions supporting
annexation to the City of Springfield.
5. The p,upusal was consistent with boundary coinrnissjon administrative rule policies.
,
pI: LCBC: L'VJOS Nl2OOlN:SP0814 SN,DOC
1.mr Savod: F.bTVDry 1.2008
LCLGBC Staff Notes (e sp 08 - 14) - February?, 2008
Pag~ IV-A-IO
ATTACHMENT 1 - 19
r
.,
EXHIBIT B - P1B
>
Map NO-IV-A-l Vicinity Map
,AnoexatioD to Springfield (International
- Chun:h ofFomsquare Gospel)
CSP08-14
Date Received'
Planner: BJ
?11,o~
, I
'Shad 0(.1. QI
C;-j,
4,,;:::
~pii'jtt
A.
tl
," '" ';).000' --,.....:;:::::-
-ffTfL~/
'~....~ ......-
." --: .
v.e~"Jo' ,
~.. -
LCLGBC Staff Notes (e SPaS ~ 14) - Febiuary 7. 2008
PageN-A~ll '.
, ,ATTACHMENT 1 - 20 "
EXH I B IT B - P19
Map No. IV -A-2 Site Map
Annexation 10 Springfield (lnlernational
Chun:b ofFom,quan: Gospel)
CSP08-14 i
Date Received' 1;.(1,j
Planner': BJ
,I
[, "'1
-
III
III
...
-
II)
5
lD
. ~~;;'i: il~;J.1
,:~;~;~~~: )~.;j,}t'n~':;I~ '
ne~
"'~_..'._"'~":'.
I
T'['~~;Ji
- Blackstone Sl
-
\.
,
r
ml
'~I "-
5 '
10
~
'.'_"~~~': t;J~:
~. ,. "II;~,~,",\.,"... ~ .~:::::!-'~
,~~~~\"{~~::' r..',\'
\~~~~~~~
-, '~"m""~~.'~
~:~:~,,-,;~ ~~~
~~~~~~, '."~,,,.,,;, ',,' ',:
~&~. ,'" ,
r~." "''''\'\'~\'''~~~, :","
~'~~.. ~~...~~~:i;.f):!
.~~~,,\,::,:((&\j~:""r\'\
~~~~!iii\,\'~z~~\~~\,>,~
'~~~~;'~&_'~,I')~
~~'rl~~,a.l~
,. ~>."",~~'1.'~~"\~'
'~~~'\\""\\"\;'~':',~'c\"f"~\>""~
, :~\\;t~~\~\~\\;~~,\~,:
" " , l~~~~~\~~~~,
,;~p~,en !3ridge Way
-" - . .,-' " .
",J, ,L -La) L.:~ L.:. 1':.
ANNEXATION AREA
J, Includ..sTLs 12600, 12700, 17-03-23-34
, ' Owned by the International Church
of Foursquare Gospel ,
BCFile CSP08-14
, Royal
DeBs
'P8/k
. ~
~
-'~-q'
,L ,
.L
i'I
'ScAlI
. '~aJ"i1Q~"'::
(..
f
)
LCLGBC Staff Notes (e SP 08 -14) - February 7. 2008
Page N-A-12
ATTACHMENT 1 - 21
.
RESOLUTION NO '07-59
EXHI BIT B - P20
, Date Received: ? 110 ~
Planner: BJ
"
"
A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY
TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD AND REQUESTING TIlAT THE LANE COUNTY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE THE ANNEXATION
WHEREA:S, the City recei~ed a request to annex approximately 4.13' acres into the City of Springfield on November
22, 2006, said territory being descnbed as follows: I' "
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax Lots 12600 and 12700 (commonly known as 600
Hayden Bridge Way, Springfield) as generally depicted and more particularly described in Exhibit A of this
Resolution. . ,
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is within the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth Boundary, and is
adjacent to the .city Limits; and, "
WHEREAS, the City Council,is authorized by ORS 1 99.49Q(2)(a)(A) to initiate annexation upon receiving cons~nt
in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be annexed and written consent
from more than half of the owners ofland in the territory proposed to be annexed, who also own more than half of
the land in the territory proposed to be annexed and of real property: therein representing more than half of the
assessed value of all real property in t1ie territory proposed to be anjIexed;
WHEREAS, OIie hundred p~rcent of the property ownerS oftheterritoiy signed a consent to annex (Exhibit B); and,
WHEREAS, there are no registered electors in the territory to be annexed (EXhibit C); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield DevelopmentCode 6.070; ORS 222.111 and other
"applicable Oregon Revised Statutes to initiate annexation when the tefritory in'the annexation proposal can be
provided with the minimum key level ofuroan facilities andservicesiin an orderly and efficient manner as defined in
the Eugrne-Springfield Metro Area General Plan Policy 8, Page n-B~, and where'there will be a logical area and
time' wilhiIi which to deliver urban services and facilities; and" ' , , ' '
, I,
WHEREAS, minimum level of key urban services and facilities are defined in the Eugene-Springfield Metro Area
Gimeral Plan, Page Y-3 as,sanitary sewer service, stonnwater service, solid waste management, water service, fire
and emergency medical services, police i"U~'M;On, city-wide parks ll!1d recreation programs, electric service, land use '
controls, comm~ic.ation facilities and services, and public schools on a district-Wide basiS; and,
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed can be immediately provided with a minimum level of key, urban
facilities and services, with the exception qf City stonnwater and sanitary sewer services wbich are available within '
public streets near the property; and, , "
,
WHEREAS provision of City stonnwater and sanitary sewer services has been arranged through an Annexation
Agreement that has been negotiated with City staff and the property owner, as described in Attachment 2, CaSe
Number LRP2006-00030; and, , ,",
" ,
WHEREAS, an Annexation Agreement has been proposed for execution by the City of Springfield and the property
owner (International Church of the Foursquare Gospel Ui'".";';ng as Springfield Faith Center) which will memorialize
the Owner's commitment, agreement and obligation.to meet the City's requirements for provision of the minimum
, level of key urban services and facilities as required for an affmnative City recommendation for the annexation
, I
,request; and, ' , " '
WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forward this resolution supporting the applicant's annexation request
to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission when lm Annexation Agreement is'entered into by the
City of Springfield and Intema,tional Church of the FoUrsquare Gospel (Owner);
ATTACHMENT 1 - 22
10.1
;~- ~
EXHIBIT B - P21
3. /1,cJ 5
. ' Date Recelve'1' ,
NOW THEREFORE BASED ON TIlE FOREGOING RECITALS, THE ~ OOUNCn.. OF TIlE CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD DOES RESOL VB AS FOLLOWS: ,"
Section I: Th~ Common' Council ofthci City of Springfield does hereb,y recommend approval of the annexation of the
subject territory to the City by the Lane County Local Government BO!1Ildary Commission, Lane County, Oregon, said
territory being descri~ed as follows: ' " , '
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax Lots12600 and 12700 (commonly known as 600
Hayden BridgeWay, Springfieid) as generally depicted and more particularly descn"bedin Exhibit A of this
Resolution. .'
Section 2: This resolution shall take effect upon adoption by the Common Council of the City of Springfield and
approval by the Mayor.
Section 3: The City,Council recommends that ,the Boundary Commission approve the proposed annexation upon
execution of an Annexation Aw.eement as descn"bed in the recitals.
Section 4: The City Manageds hereby authorized to sign the Final Annexation Agreement which memorializes the
Owner's commitment, agreement and obligation to meet the City's requirements for provision of the minimum level'of
key urban services and facilities.
Section 5: The City Manager shall forward this Resolution supporting the applicant's annexation request to the Lane
County Local Government Boundary Commission,
ADQP1ED by the Common Council'ofthe City of Springfield this 3rd day of December, 2007, by a vote of
Ii for and 0 against , '
,
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 3rd day ?fDecember, 2007.
'~~'
City Recorn€J
\'>0, ,
. ' ,
. ',' ~
'-'~j~~
, '/ Mayor V
ATTEST:
f'-"',q"r:r, ~ Pi1'"'''O\lED
~:~:.; :;:t; to"" "'; tiif r. f\.\i'
. ~'~ ~o ,OH~ L~... ..
DI\T'=~m2.~ I 'c..
OffiCE Of C,WATTORNEY
City of Springfield. Oregon
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY
IJ ~-bUJt- '-
-C~ R~n1er
.
ATTACHMENT 1 - 23,
,
,
..-
Blackstone St
\
,
7
Royal
De"e
~ark
I
~
, NotlDmu.
,;
.1
I
I
I
-
Gl
l!!
iii
---,....... :5",
10
l
,).---,
EXHI BI T B - P22
'Date Received' ~.11 0 ~
Planner: BJ
'. ---..
.l!.An.J.DU A
---I'
:!i!..
. .!1!
ll':::J
~~
I
1'---
Hayden Bridge Way
.:!
:5
Gi (1
l!! :!!
Ci5 ~.
i-. ~
i:
. ,.'; i
. ,
. :~. 'n
,.-
. . ~
.:. !
-
Gl
l!!
-
rn
Gil 1c l
~ I Blac,tStone St
,101 'I ,I
I I ~~"~\:;~~"~,~'%.~~ I
~~~~~""~~"~" ~,,-R,~~~':$1 .
I ,~1~'~\~'~~'~\'~,~'i~,' I
~'.~~..~~~~~\,\,' , '
-~~'j~~\~~~%.\~,~~. ~ 1 I
~ ~~'\"'''''''''fu~:t>:\'' ' '
~~ .,,~ ,\ '\'\:~...~ ~ ~W .
, 1~~'''''~~k,,%\,*,~ ~ I
"'\~""'~".'\"*'~~~'" I
. ""\~ ~~""'" ,~~~~~ ~: .
f)-~~\~~~l1~~~~
~~~~~\""':"~_'\~'e
. ' ~~~~~'!t~~~~'~H
CambridgeSt,. .~~"'1~
n ~.~.~~~,~\~~~.
( .~~~~\~. " '''''c,~''\~W ~
~,~~~\~~~~~~,. i
, ~"""""'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''~~~\:''S
.\:;..."....".... .., ., ., .. ,.....,~,"
.'-i';";'\."~" ~-: '~' ~'L~'.'.'.~:.':,~":\\\~\\~,,' ~, ,
:';
,'j ,
Rciyaldel Lane,;,',' :,
.,i
" -<....';.
",
, ".
'1 \ RNe'~on ~Zi
I~ tJ:
. ,.;
'l-'~A
"C
,0
f'.. ..
,N" c";
, .,.' ".
'~:~-E,.':~.J"~ "i!'
:,' '.. '.;- :.::';\~~'-:
.
EXHIBIT B - P23
;
EXHIBIT B.
Date Received: ' ~,(lo!'
Planner,:, BJ
FORM #1
PETITION
ANNJ:XATION,TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
'. .
TO: LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
We, the undersigned,' constitute the oWners of at least one-half of the land area of the property described,
in !;he .ft>!~hm>:nt marlted "Exhibit An AND '
, We desire to be annexed to the City of Springfield. A map: is attached marked ~'bit B," showing the
affected ;....;;.,.1 and its relationship to the present city lli;nit boundaries.
The annexation constitutes a minor'boundary change undet the BoundarY Commission Act ~d should
therefore be considered by the Boundary Commission and, after snidy, a Final Order shoUld be entered by the
Boimdary Commission. '. " .' . , "i,' . '
By ~~_ j
~ . ~cretary,
Date-.Jylv' ~. 'nn~
. B 'L-,n J . . C~ller '
'By
Date
,
.,
r
Tll1y I=i
?nD.~
Date
By . Date,
MAP# 17 -.!:l3~..2.. ~ - ':?4 LOT# (:J..l. (!)O
MAP# 17- OJ -)-3 -' 3</ LOT#- )J- 7 aD
:
With 'the above signature, I am v'erifying~hat I have the authority:to
consent to the annexation on my own beh~lf or on behalf of my firm,
agency or trust .
s
,ATTACHMENT 1 -25
!
"".1
~. .....,
,
EXHIBIT B - P24
;
bate Received' '?,/1.or
Planner: BJ
VERIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS
I '.. .'.
I have caused a search to, be made of the assessmc::nt and taxation records, Lane County
. . \
Department of Assessment and Taxation (A&1), on 17-03-23-34-12600 and 17-03-23-34-12700..
Those records reflect that the . International Church of the F ourScmare Gosoel are, the oWners
, o~ record of the property identified by the tax lots desCIl;oed on the attached sheet. ,A&T is not
, '
. responsIble for subsequent deed' activity which may -not yet be reflected on the A&T
_~.t'.rterized taX roll.
~:J ~tUIu-
Lane County DcpartIIumt of Assessment and Taxation
11/14/07
, 'Date
I:\A TINFO\Busin~ces~\flIA~~'froJl~"6erifi:ca1ion fozm.doc
, fin7/m, Ij
-:
PETITION I.D.
PETITION FOR rB ANNEXATION TO DISTRiCTS 0 FORMA'l'ION OF DlSTRlCT
~ ' ~GNATURESHEET
:m THE COUNTY ~LEcr~ONS PILING OFFlt.:.KI~ISTRICT OP"
. .
,'J .~ .j..
TIllS IS A CITY I DISTRICT
PETITION. SIGNERS OF THIS
PAGE MUST BE REGISTERED
VOTERS IN LANE COUNTY ONLY.
,<:::;Dr--? f'... (fe'.. cd \ A
, .~ - "
PA.TI: IIIGNED
.,OIDAYIY.-.
usmENCE ADDREU
ITRJ:ET. NUMBER" CITY
'Ra. aEa.
O",I1IU OWN".
PRINT NAME
MAP & TAX LOT
_ 17--o.J...;I,j'3t" I.:z:.,-
!--7/6/06 Tim J.' B"'akin.........All.a~. s.~. l'nO W. SUDBe~ Bhi12::....~...7~-.Ty~...
li~e; Luu "
...- -7/06JOE .Lvnda '.1. Gunt:nn. Aaa!:,_ ('0. oa' Anl!'elea. ,CA 9(026 II'
~
3.
~
:t'" 4.
.~ S.
~6.
I"i
:2 7.
B.
119.
!j 10.
11.
12.
13.
/14.
IS. '
16.
17.
lB.
19.
CIRCULATOR',S VERlPICATJON
, ~
THIS VERIFICATION MUST DE
SIGNED BY THE CIRCULA, TOR
SHEET NUMBER
,.,
",
,'" ,.
'"
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
ANNEXATION TO DISTRICTS I FORMATION OF D~TRlCT rllllll0N .
I, (print circulator'. name).:;r.i4 . t=:":',. c~ _ . . ~ .- L ~ _ . hereby vorliy every' per.on who .Igned
Ihi. .heet ,did 10 In my pr~"enco ~ believe ~a~ ,. r.~i.tered voler in Iho cily I di.trlct
SlGNATURI! OF CIRCULAT~ J , ~,_ _ ~ c:::-. ~ C-
C1RCULATOR'SADDRESS(.treGty'and:Z:c~~O)~~ -:~~ . ,,'.,.._y5../'-. Rd.
. .~""_L.~~___ ~_( .--......11
...
D
U
:ij .
Q
-
ff
:a'
,9
D
,..
1!
,.a
Il
...
D
U
,on
D
-S
Ii ,u
II ,', IE
:g"C::ll"
.lliiia
. ~ ~ ~~
!l :-! D '"
I od,s
c..., 5 r:: "'
,:to, i<
"Iii". ',. "C
'->'
"--...>>
~..:....
6,.,::
t ,,~
11 ,~
.d -<
_. t:l _.~
~
:I:
lD
=l
C'l
-
'"
-
-i
"
t:J
oJ
J1
~,
,
EXHIBIT B - P'26
.
FORM #2A
'CERTIFICATION OF REGISTERED VOTERS
R d ?,(1,(J~,
Date eceiva:
Planner: BJ
I hereby certify that if signatures on the a1tachedpetition are re~ voters and reside in
the area described In th'e petition. These signatures ',~l'.~.ent not less than 50 pcrcentofthe registered YOM
residing within the annexation or withdraVr.il area described in:. this petition.
~OJ' J... \ .;ioo'"
'.~."-"~~~
".r~~n" c~
.;, ':::"9~~~;"-!:~";f"J
.; J Pf.
'h:~tSEAL g
~\' "'.4 0
". j).",
,", (\. ~,9$';{
. '\.. Vtl~"'TY Olo~
.I.;.\~~ .
~ .,
~ ~~\..
Dcp r Clerk :,
Lane County, Oregon '
Date
+"
ATTACHMENT 1 - 28
t,
Informational Attachment
EXHIBIT B - P27
Date Received' ? 11,0'6
Planner: BJ
;
i
. For the proposed annexation of:l:4.13 acres of 1'.u1'...;jlocated at 690 Hayden Bridge Way. The area is described
on Lane County Assessor's Map 17-03~23-34, TL 12600 & 12700. . The legal description of the property follows:
Beginning at an iron pipe set 90 feet West and'600 feet North ofa ppint 2,823.48 feet (42.78 challis) South of the'
Northeast comer ofthe.1acob Halstead Donation Land Claim No. 47, Notification No. 3810, in Section 23,
Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian; Lane County, Oregon; thence South 01" 01' 15"
East 90 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 89" 53' West 31.5 feet to-an iron pipe; thence South 00" 01' 15" East
150.50 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 89" 53' East 127.59 feet tl1 a point on the WeSt line of the William
Spencer Donation Land Claim Number 50 that is marked by an iron pipe; thence South 00" 13' 30" west 319.50
feet along last said West line taa point'on the north margin of Hayden Bridge Way as said margin is offset 40.00
feet northerly by perpendicular measurement from the centerline of said road; thence along said north margin of
Hayden Bridge Way, North 89" 53' West 369.77 feet, more orIess, ,to the Southeast comer ofLat 2, Block 6 of
"Royal Delle", as platted and recorded in Book 29 at Page 21 in the Plat Records of Lane County, State of Oregon; ,
thence North 00" 01' 15" West along the EaSt: line of said Block 6 wid 'its Northerly eXtension 560 feet.to an iron
pipe; and thence South 89" 53' East.275 feet returning to the point6fbeginning and containing 4.13 acres more or
, less.' '
Zoning
The Low DensitY Residential (LDR)zoning of the ,subject 1'.u1'~';Y and existirig use is consistent with the
M~;'u1'ulitan Area General plaii (Metro Plan) ,and the City's Development Code. Churches are listed as a
Discretionary Use in the LOR District A site review permit for the church was issued by Lane County in July,
1984 and up~eld by the LaneCoimty Hearings Official in S~mb~, 1984 (Case PAI315-84).
Sanitary Sewer
The existing church is not currently connected to the city sanitary s~er system. There are three possible
connection points for extension of sanitary sewer to the property: . an existing public sanilary sewer line within
Blackstone Street northeast of the property; ,a public sanitary sewCr line that extends south of Blackstone Street
roughly paxalIel with and about 80 feet offset from the east 1';v1'~';/:line of the site; and a sanitary sewer line at the
intersection of Mint Meadow Way and Old Orchard Lane (~1'.-:~tely 500 feet east ofthe'southeastem comer of
the site). The public sanitary seWer lines within and extending from Blackstone Street are located within the City
limits. However, extension of a sanitary sewer line from the intersection of Mint Meadow Way and Old Orchard
Lane would require ~1'1" u' al of an ~A;' ~;.... ;;orial eXtension along HilYden Bridge Way.
. ~ -
Solid Waste M:mageme~t ,
The City and Sanipac have an exclusive franchise ammgemi:nt'for garbage service inside the city limits. Upon
annexation, Sampac will serve this property.' ,I,., .
Water Service,
Rainbow Water District is Currently serving the site with water and will continue to do so until the July following
the completion ofannexatiOIi, at which time SUB Water will be the provider. Water service to the ...~.._.:; ,
originates from a 6-inch water main in Hayden Bridge Way. '
Electric
SUB Electric is currently serving the site with power from an overhead line running north-south along the western
boundary of the site. '
Fire and Life Safety
The Fire Marshal has reviewed the application ~d has determined tb,at fire and emergency services are available to
this property. The building has an existing fire sprinkler system and there is' a fire hydrant at the southeast corner of
the site.' "
Police Protection
Upon annexation, the area will receive police 1'.u.......;on from the citY of Springfield. Police 1'.~;"";';on and
.~...~...se to priority calls can be prm:ided to this site.JlP9n 3nn~On ~onsistent'with service 1'.".........;00 thioughout
. , ATTACHMEN 1-1 - 2 . ' , " .
,t,
~
EXHIBIT B - P28
J
the city. , Date Received: :3;,11,0 i
Parks and Recreation Programs '. Planner: BJ
After annexation to the City of Springfield, the subject property will be within the Willamalane Park and
R..~. "';';on 'District boundary. City residents receivr,: park and . w. ""';on services from the District The District
operntes two aquatic centers, a COIIlIIiuriity Center, an Adult Activity Center, and 31 parlcs containing a variety of
outdoor recreational amenities. There is one park currently located:in the vicinity of the annexation area: RoyaI
DeIIe,a 2.76-acre neighborhood park at 401 Blackstone Street. Among other features, the park contains an opm
play area, basketball court, playground, picnic shelter and tables, and night lighting. Other nearby ......~onal
opportunities include Harvest Landing and Page Parle. A complete listing ofWilJ.m.lane's parks and programs can
be found on-line at www,WillamaIane.orn, or at 736-4044. '
Although the site is zoned LDR, there are no occup~ed dwellings on thei site and none are proposed. For this
reasoli, the ". _"w. ~I should not geni:rate any additional demands for park and recreation .facilities.
Land Use Controls
, The City of Springfield Development Services Department bas provided all planning and building functions for the
owners of the subject "'U,,~ .J. The City of Springfield DeVelopment Services Department will continue to provide
land use control for the site after the annexation.
Communication Facilities
Qwest and AT&T currently provide communications in the area foricable service and an array of wireless
companies provide different communication services. The City bas no exclusive franchise arrangements with
telecommunication or wireless companies. The field is competitive ,and therefore guanmtees a wide selection.
Public Scbools
Public School services an: available through School District 19. Page Elementary School is locatedjust to the east
of the subject Il'._"w.~j. As stated previously, the site does ,not contain any dwellings and should not generate any
additional demands on the school system.' ,
Stormwater Control ,
Roof runoff is directed onto the site, 'and passes into a series ofciltch basins within the site "",I,.;,.,.g lot. From the
catch basin system, stu.~n~ infiltrates into a dryweII. There are existing public ..v.~nater .facilities adjacent to
the site within Hayden Bridge Way. Any future development or redevelopment on this site will require """'U.I:"':ate
stonnwater management techniques in accordance with City standazds. Approval of an ~..;. .....",;..:niaI extension is
not 'V'i":'..J to extend private stu.~n_v" lines through unin_."u._~ areas to serve the site.
"
ATTACHMENT 1 - 30
l
,
"
,~
EXHIBIT B - P29
.
Office of the Secrelaly of State
BILL BRADB1lllY
:.-.:....J of State
Archives DivisiDll
MARY BETH HERKERT
Director
800 Summer St NE
Salem, Oregon 97310
(503) 373-D7D1
Facsimile (503) 373-0953
February 19, 2008
Date Heceived'? r1,t1~
Planner: BJ
Lane County Local
Government Boundary Commission
Paula L Taylor
99 East Broadway, Suite 400
Eugene OR 97401-3111
Dear Ms. Taylor:
Please be advised that we have received and filed the following Annexation(s):
Ordinance Number
Our File Number'
Date
C SP 08-14 (SprIngfield)
EC ED 07-50 (Eugene)
AN 2008-0018
AN 2008-0019
02/14/2008
02/14/2008 '
, I
Please verify the effective date(s) for these annexatiOns through the application of
ORS 199.519 '
Our assigned' file number(s) are included with the above information.
Sincerely,
c:tv..t! 4J ~~..JL
Linda Bjornstad
Official Public Documents
cc: Lane County Oerk
ODOT /Highway Division
PRC/Population Research Center
Revenue Cartography Section
WWWServer- http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us . Intemet.E-mail-referenc:e.art:hives~tate.or.us
, Oregon Genealogy ListserV - __ ___....;;..rchivel4.so~.state.or.us ,
'ATTACHMENT 1 - 31 '
-,
..,11
Meeting Date:
Meeting Type:
Department:
Staff Contact:
Staff Phone No:
Estimated Time:
March 10, 2008
Special Regular Mtg
Development Services
Jim Donov~n
726-3660' 'BiLG
5 Minutes
AGENDA ITEM ,SUMMARY
SPRINGFIELD
CITY COUNCIL
ITEM TITLE:
ACTION
REQUESTED:
ISSUE
STATEMENT:
ATTACHMENTS:
DISCUSSION/
FINANCIAL
IMPACT:
RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT WITHDRAWAL EC SP 08-14,
CITY PLANNING JOURNAL NUMBER LRP2006-00030 (FOURSQUARE
GOSPEL CHURCH)
The City Council is requested to conduct a public hearing and first reading of the
attached ordinance: AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF FOURSQUARE GOSPEL, LOCATED IN
NORTH SPRINGFIELD, NORTH OF HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, EAST OF 5TH STREET,
WEST OF 7"' STREET AND INVOLVING APPROXlMA TEL Y 4,13 ACRES IDENTIFIED
AS TAXS LOT 12600 AND 12700, TI7S R03W S23 MAP 34 AND OTHERWlSE KNOWN
AS 600 HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, SPRINGFIELD; HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT,
Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 222.520) require that territory located in the
Rainbow Water District, which is annexed to the City of Springfield, be withdrawn
from that district to prevent double taxation. ORS requires withdrawal prior to
March 31" of each calendar year. The owner requested annexation in order to
develop the property for urban use, The subject property was annexed to the City of '
Springfield effective on February 7, 2008.
Attachment I: Ordinance with Legal Description, Boundary Commission Staff
Report with Maps, City Council Resolution and Notices of Adoption
Legal notice for tonight's public hearing was published in the Register Guard
newspaper as required by ORS 222,520 and notices were posted in four public
places, A second reading and adoption ,is scheduled for March 17,2008,
.'
ORDINANCE NO.
(Special)
AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL
CHURCH OF FOURSQUARE GOSPEL, lOCATED IN NORTH SPRINGFIELD, NORTH OF
HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, EAST OF 5TH STREET, WEST OF 7tt! STREET AND INVOLVING
APPROXIMATELY 4.13 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAXS lOT 12600 AND 12700, T17S R03W
S23 MAP 34 AND OTHERWISE KNOWN AS 600 HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD, SPRINGFIELD;
HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER
DISTRICT. '
, WHEREAS, certain real property described below was annexed to the City of Springfield
by order of Lane County local Government Boundary Commission under Boundary Commission
Number File EC SP 08-14, effective 217/08, as recommended in City Planning File No, lRP2006-
00030 and supported by City Council Resolution No. 07-59 (and further described in Exhibit A &
B), and
WHEREAS, the property to be withdrawn is located within the boundaries of the Rainbow
Water District, and
WHEREAS, the City of Springfield Common Council held a public hearing and first reading
in the Springfield City Council Chambers on MarCh 10, 2008, and a second reading and adoption
, on March 17, 2008, in accordance with ORS 222.524, for the purpose of hearing any objections to
the withdrawal of the property from the public service district mentioned and there having been no
objections raised.'
NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOllOWS:
Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the
real property described should be in the best interest' Of the City of Springfield withdrawn from the
Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, insofar as the property is located therein.
Section 2: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the
following described real property within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District is and shall
be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in lane County, Oregon, said property being
described as follows: Township 17South, Range 03West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax lots 12600,-
and 12700, and commonly known as 600 Hayden Bridge Road'in Springfield; as more particularly
described in Exhibit B of this ordinance, Boundary Commission File Number EC SP 08-14.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 17h day of March 2008,
by a vote of for and. against.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 17tt! day of March 2008.
Mayor
ATTEST: '
City Recorder
,. {-,
~:<"--'~_:::>_~'~':":\._-
~) :z.$ 1 os:-._.
1 ;
ATTACHMENT 1 - 1
EXHIBITA;- Pl
J!.AJ:1.lDU A
,
-'
Iml
~I
_, UJ1
I I
I I
/-:;:' :g ::--- '
_ :!s
Q) ~:l
~ I....... ~~
10l ,
Blacl<stone St' " ' Royaldel Lane
I ,']'" "
"'".:.
~ ' . . .
. . ... .'i';'
" '
~,4.\\,,,~<,.:~,"'~.-t,,~,.":,":~~~:'. I /, \ '
'" ',,\':\,".".-.'~":S' "":-: ;" --,
1;~""}\:,;,,w"A\::~ I \: ' "" <
;,-,I,t,;I'~'~"~'~"~'~"~M:~'.'~.'~.::~"'~~ , ,)"" ' " ,';'
," ' .~ ~'. River Knoll Way,:it
<\~'i,~~~" I ~
'*~~\~~~~ 1lI '>:.
t'~;t~~~~,\';:~~~"""" ,'w ...J,
,..,,~;1;,"*~'''''-i!&.~~*''\, '~~"i" "C
",,!Sl'~'" '@P'. ''-
U'~ ,\' ~~~~r ~ I
~&t~~~'!;,\~~g~.":~'''''''''..''i~i1 o~
," '~"~\'~~"'~~~'" >>,~':J
..i1~'~~~~~--- :2
~~~~~'*~~~~~ 0
-~~~~~~~~'''~~~~,~~~~~~ ~ -
~" ;,~"\~:"~,,,,~,~~\.,~,,w''.''\\'\\''\'1 i.
..~~';~~;~"""~""t~" '
-~~~~;:...~~"",~~,~,,,,,~~,,~,,*,~,:~~
Hayden Bridge Way
" '
."; \
';
"
Blackstone St.
--
'\
.. ,
7
Royal
Delle
parle
I
I
Cambridge st.
Ii (
r j
LiiS
5'
, UJ
.
~
!l ~,
~ :g
'! Ci5 i-
5 {!
""l~
:. ..'.r.";'
,-" '\:',>~~
~
I
.
, Notto=lc
Legal Description "
Beginning at an iron pipe set 90 feet West and 600 feet North ofa point 2,823.48 feet (42,78 chains) South of the
Northeast comer of the Jacob HaIstead Donation Land claUD No. 47, Notification No. 3810, in Section 23,
, Township 17 South; Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, Lane County, Oregon; thence South 01. 01' IS"
East 90 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 89. 53' West 31.5 feet to an iron pipe; thence SouthOO. 01' IS" East
150.50 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 89. 53' East 127.59 feet to a point on the West line of the William
Spencer Donation Land Claim Number 50 that is marked by an iron'pipe; thence South 00. 13' 30" W!lst 319.50
feet along last said West line to a point on the north margin of Hayden Bridge Way as said margin is offset 40.00,
feet northerly by .t'~. .t'~udicular measurement from the centerline of said road; thence along said north margin of '
Hayden Bridge Way, North 89..53' West 369,77 feet, more or less, to the Southeast comer of Lot 2, Block 6 of '
"Royal Delle", as platted and recorded in Book 29 at Page 21 in the Plat Records of Lane County, State of Oregon;
thence North 00" 01 'IS" West ,along the East line of said Block 6 an~ its Northerly extension 560 feet to an iron
pipe; and thence South 89" 53~ East 275 feet returning to the point of beginning and containing 4.13 acres more or
less. ' ,
ATTACHMENT 1 - 2
EXHIBIT B - Pl
-oregon
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
99 East Broadway
Suite 400
Eugene, OR 97401-3111
(541) 682-4425
FAX (541) 682-2635
February 13, 2008
Ms. Amy Sowa, Recorder
City of Springfield
225 5th Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477 '
Dear Ms. Sowa:
, ' ,
The enclosed final order has been enacted by the Lane County Local Government Boundary
Conunission and is forwarded in conformance with ORS 199.505.
Final Order 1332 (C SP 08 - 14) annexirig territory to the City of Springfield
(International Church of Foursqmire Gospel)
Please acknowledge receipt of this fmal order:
Sincerely,
C?~a{. :J~.
Paula L Taylor
Executive Officer
Enclosures
cc: IjIternational Church of Foutsquare Gospel
Rainbow Water and Fire District
WillamaIane Park and Recreation District
LCBC:LCOG: L 'lJJClEOLV'1/I2001N:SP08I4 FOLDOC
Uut Sav.d: F.bruary J J. 2OD8
ATTACHMENT 1 - 3
EXHIBIT B - P2
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
FINAL ORDER 1332
Approved: February 7, 2008
Effective: February 7, 2008
( File C SP 08 - 14
( In the Matter of Annexing Territory
(, To the City of Springfield
- Legal Description Attached as Exhibit A -
WHEREAS, Resolution 07-59 by the City of Springfield was filed on December 31,
2007-in accordance with ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A)-Jor annexation of territory to the City of
Springfield, described in attached Exhibit A and shown on attached map Exhibit B; and,
,WHEREAS, the commission duly published notice of the public hearing in accordance
with ORS 199.463 and in accordance with the rules of the commission and ORS 199.452(1),
conducted a public hearing on February 7, 2008; and,
WHEREAS, on the basis of the study of the proposal, which considered economic,
demographic, and sociological trends and physical development of the land including the
applicable comprehensive plan, and of the public hearing, tpe commission approved the poupusal
and made the fmdings and reasons attached as Exhibit C. '
NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED: That the area described be a part of the City of
Springfield.
ORDERED BY TIlE LANE COUNTY LOCAIi. GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY
COMMISSION TIIIS 7lh DAY OF FEBRUARY 2008. '
OJ- ;~
Clay' M~:-rJ Chair
2-Jo-,lop
;
Date
NOTE: The subject territory is within the Rainbow Water and FIre District and will remain io the
district until withdrawn through separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS
222. '
In accordance with ORS, 199.51O(2)(c), the territory is bereby a part of the Lane Couoty Metropolitan
Wastewater Service District and WillamaIane Park and Recreation District. '
pI: LCBC: L 'lBClFOLIPH\2OOll1CSPOB14 FO.DOC
Um Sav.d: F.bnuzry 7. 2008
ATTACHMENT 1 ~ 4
.EXHIBITB- P3
"
EXHIBIT A
Beg at an iron pipe set 90.00 ft Wand 600.00 ft N of apt 2',823.48 ft (42.78 ch) S of the NE cor
of the Jacob Halstead DLC No. 47, Notification No. 3810, S23 T17S R03W WM, Lane County,
Oregon;
th SoooO l' 15''E 90.00 ft to an iron pipe;
th N89053'W 31..50 ft to an iron pipe;
th SOOOO 1'15''E 150.50 ft to an iron pipe;
th S89053'E 127.59 ft to a pt on the W Ii of the William Spencer DLC No. 50 that is marked by
. . L
an Iron pIpe; "
th Sooo13'30"W 319.50 ft alg sd W Ii to a pt on the N mar of Hayden Bridge Way, sd mar is
, offset 40.00 ft Nly by perpendicular measurement fr the cIli of sd rd; ,
th alg sd N mar N89053"W 369.77 ft mil to theSE cor Lot 2, Block 6 of Royal Delle, as platted
and recorded in Bk 29 Pg 21 LCOPR, Lane County, Oregori;
". I
th NOOoO 1 '15"W alg the E Ii of sd Block 6 and its Nly exte~sion 560.00 ft to an iron pipe;
th S89053'E 275.00 ft to the POB, all in Lane County, Oregon.
LCBC:LCOG: I..:VJDU:GAL\2OO1I1CSPOB14 LGl..DOC
~I Saved: F~bru.aryJl, 2008
Filial order 1332
C SP 08 - 14
Page 1 of!
ATTACHMENT 1 - 5
." , ,"" ."
~ ");.''''''
.~~"
~~1 "p, \ ~'\'t
\'~ "". ~~"
'" ,,,~,,,,r,,,,s"
~"': if" "
. .. ."
." ""~"~ ~"~~,..
':,~~~~,--"',. ,
~i"\=';'\\\\'''~'~~<i' ., ~.,,: ;,;' ", "
1~\~'\~~,~~\l_:"~~'Z""~"\'
..\~ "ij.~.~
-~"......'::~,~
~I_~~'~~~
~~ ~'\'AA"'1r'\,\""\'\"'':~'!':\~
~~~\~,~~~~'~.~~<~(:~:~~\~~,
~"-~,\~~\~
,~"'\.~~~~\~
-~~~~~,
Hayden Bridge Way.
.' Blackstone St
--
\
ail
l!!1
~I
I
I
,
,
, Royal
Dene
PatIc
EXHIBIT B - P4
EXHIBIT B
ail
~I
5
CD
J I, L.../., I .1 I
ANNEXATION AREA
'I Includes TLs 12600, 12700, 17-03-23-34
~ Owned by the International Olurch
of FomSiJuare Gospel
Be File CSP08-14
...:......
T
I II
~,
,I
Final Order 1332
CSP08-14
Page 1 of 1
!
r(
"5....,!1
~~."IO)\'\
ATTACHMENT 1 - 6
"
EXHIBIT B - P5
EXHmIT C
Findinl!s:
I. This proposal was initiated with the boundary c~mmission by the City of Springfield
after receiving consents from the property owner'on December 31, 2007, in accordance
with ORS I 99,490(2)(a)(B). The proposal was found to be a valid filing under OAR
191-006.
'2. The proposed annexation, as submitted, included two tax lots (Tl7S R03W S23 Map 34
tax lots 12600 and 12700) comprising approximately 4.13 acres and was owned by the
International Church of Foursquare Gospel. The ,annexation ,area was developed with a '
church facility and was not contiguous to the main' body of the City of Springfield. '
I
3. The land use designation for the annexation area was low-density residential in the
Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan).
4. The annexation area was zoned IDRIUF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe,
in Lane County. After, the annexation effective date, the property was rezoned LDR
consistent with the land use designation.
Provide an impartUd forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the
effects of the boundary change on other units of government. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and
199.410(3)(c)
5. The boundary commission held a public hearing on February 7, 2008. Notice of the
public hearing was given in accordance with ORS 199 provisions. All interested parties
were given.a reaSonable opportunity to be heard.
6. After annexation to Springfield, the annexation area would be withdrawn from the
Rainbow Water and Fue District. There would be some financial impact on 'the district
because .it derives its water revenue from user fees and the annexation area was
developed with a church. The annexation area ,would be withdrawn from the district
through separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. On
behalf of the City of Springneld, the Springfield Utility Board provided service directly
to the annexation area. '
7. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed automatically to the
Lane County M-,uvl'ulitan Wastewater Service District.in accordance with ORS
199.51O(2)(c).
8. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed automatically to the
Willamalane Parks and Recreation District in accordance with ORS 199.51O(2)(c).
9. This request was consistent with this standard.
Final Order 1332
CSP08-14
Page I of 3
ATTACHMENT 1 - 1
,
EXHIBIT B - P6
Consider the orderly detennination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best
meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where
intergovernmental options are identified and nwke decisions based on the most effective long-
range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a)
and (e)
10. Annexation to the City of Springfield was identified in the acknowledged Metro Plan as
the preferred method for providing key urban faCilities and services to the area within
Springfield's p6rtion of the urban growth boundary.
1 L _ Annexation to 'an existing city was the method for extending urban facilities and services
to urbanizable land in the boundary commission's policy administrative rule,
implementing policies (I), (2), (5), and (7). '
12. The proposed annexation was the means of boundary'change outlined in the Metro Plan
and the boundary commission administrative' ~Ies for ultimately providing urban
facilities and services to this territory. Annexati6n of tax lotted property fulfilled the
Metro Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary.
13. The proposed annexation met the criteria for noncontiguous annexations in the boundary
commission law and the Metro Plan.
14. This request was consistent with boundary commission policies and this ,standard.
Make boundary commission detenninations which are consistent with acknowledged local
comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in
the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future "growth. For major boundary changes,
there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is fi1Ul1lcially viable. ORS
199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b), and (d)
IS. The annexation area was within the urban growth boundary of the acknowledged Metro
Plan [Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) action in 1982 and as
subsequently amended]. Annexation of tax lotted property assisted in fulfilling the Metro
Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth b?undary.
16. The Metro Plan recognized'imnexation to the City of Springfield as the highest priority
for extending the minimum level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas.
17. The proposed use (church) was consistent with the policies in the Metro Plan requiring
urban levels of development within the urban growth boundary.
18. The City of Springfield indicated that the required services outlined in Metro Plan policy
#8, pagell-C-4 and defined on page V-3, were either available or can be provided in a
timely manner. ,",
Fma! Order 1332
CSP08-14
Page 2 00
ATTACHMENT 1 - 8
EXHIBIT B - P7
19. This request was consistent with this standard.
Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demograPhic, and sociological trends and
projection,s and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposaL ORS 199.410(3)(d) and
199.462(1)
20. The annexation proposal was consistent with the Metro Plan, as it was an incremental
step in implementing the long-range plan for this area. The urban growth boundary, land
uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the
, ,
m";'vl'vlitan community. The proposed use was consistent with the long"range plan for
the area and fulfilled the growth policies in the Metro Plan and in Oregon law.
, .
2 L This request was consistent with this standard.
Reasons:
1. The I',vl'vsal was supported by the City of Springfield and the property owner.
. 2, The proposal was consistent with the LCDC acknowledged Metro Plan.
. 3. The services required in the Metro Plan were eith~r available or could be provided in a
timely manner when needed.
4. The proposal was consistent with past boundary commission actions supporting
annexation to the City of Springfield.
5. The proposal was consistent with boundary commission administrative role policies.
LCBC:LCOG: L'\BOoFOLIJ!:XCI2ooIN:SPOS/4 EXC.DOC
Imts"".d: February'll. 2008
Fmal Order 1332
CSP08-14
Page 3 on
ATTACHMENT 1 - 9
EXHIBIT B - P8
STAFF NOTES
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
(99 East Broadway. Smle 400. EugOlc. eR 9740]-3] II)
Eugene Cily HaD ClllIllciI 0Iambcr
m Pearl Slrcct. Eugene
Fcbrnary 7. 2008
7:00p.m.
Annexation efTerriterv to' the Citv of S!lr!.n'.'Jtt:l~ flntematiohal Church O'fFoursCluare Gosne))
NA. BCFileCSP08-14
Initiated by ReselutiO'n 07-59,by the City ef Springfield with consents from I-'~p"'~i
ewners
. & .
Action under ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A) of the boundary commissien law
Received December 31, 2007
Action to' be taken by March 30, 2008
Descriotioil )
The annexatien area includes twO' tax lots located in east Springfield, nO'rth ef Hayden
Bridge Way, east ef 5th Street, seuth ef Blackstone Street, and west ef Old
Orchard Lane
I\uY"uj ewn~: Intertrational Church efFoursquare,Gospel (600 Haydcn Bridgc Way. Springficldj
Tax lets: 12600 and 12700, TI7S R03W S23 Map 34 '
Acres: :1:4.13
Estimate ef existing population: 0
Existing land use: Church and related facilities, vacant
Existing zening in Lane Ceunty: LDR\UF, lew-density residential with urbanizing fringe
everlay
Applicable cVLU!,,<.hensive plan: Eugene-Springfield Metrepolitan Area General Plan
(acknewledged in August 1982 and has been sllbsequently amended)
Existing public services to' the property: Police (Oregen State Police, Lane County
Sheriff), schools (Springfield School District 19),roads (Lane County, City of
Springfield), fire (Rainbow Water and Fire District contracting with the City of
Springfield), water (Rainbow Water arid FIre District)
Reason for Annexation
The property owner requested annexation to prepare the site for additional church facility
development. The Eugene-Springfield M..uv}'vlitan Arl:a General Plan requires
t',vY",Jes to' annex in erder to receive mban services.
Notice
As required by ORS 199.463(1), netice of a .publichearing must be published in a
new.}'',,}'<., of general circulatien not more than 25 days nor less than 15 days before the
J~ . . .
, '"1'-" owner means the owner of the title ofreall"'"I'~'J' ortbe wuu._;pun:haser of real property as shown on
the last avmlable complete assessment roll. ORS 199.415(13), '
, ~
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C SP 08- ]4) - February 7, 2008
PageN-A-I
ATTACHMENT 1 - 10
Ii.
EXHIBIT B - P9
hearing. In this case, notice of the public hearing was advertised in The Eugene
Register-Guard on 17, 2008. A second notice may be published in a newspaper of
general circulation or notice of the hearing may be mailed to each owner of land in the
affected territoTy,2 as descnlJed in the petition,3 not more than 15 days before the hearing.
In this case, notice 0/ the hearing was sent to the affected property owner (Tim Basldn '
and Lynda Gupton, on behalf of the Intemational 07urch of Foursquare Gospel, owner
of the property proposed for annexation) on January 25, 2008. The fmal notice required'
by the boundary commission law is the posting of a notice of the public hearing in ,.the
affected city, district, or territory at least 15 days before the hearing. In this case, notice
of the'public hearing was posted in the area of the annexation, at the Springfield dty
hall, and at the l.iJne County courthouse on January 23, 2008.
In conformance with OAR 191-005-0065(3), these staff notes are incoiporated as part of the
,,,"u,.: of the boundary commission public hearing of February 7,2008.
TIris annexation l"Upvsal was filed with the boundary c()mmission in accordance with ORS
199.490(2)(a)(A), initiated by Resolution No. 07-59 by the City of Springfield. Prior to initiating
the annexation, the City of Springfield received written consent from the l',ul"',;j owner (rim
Baskin and Lynda Gupton, on behalf of the International Church of Foursquare Gospel)
requesting annexation. At the time the annexation was initiated by the city, there were no
electors4 registered within the annexation area. The statutory provision to receive consents from
owners is met.
The l'wl'u~al was filed with the boundary commission on December 31, 2007, and boundary
commission, action must ,occur by March 24, 2008 (9O-day statutory time frame). If the
annexation is approved by the boundary commission on February 7, 2009, it will L"w,ue
effective upon passage of the final order. '
The l',ul'vsed annexation area includes two tax lots (refer to, Maps No. IV-A-1 and IV -A-2). The
annexation area is currently developed with one church on slte. Annexation to Springfield will
allow additional chlirch development to occur. '
The annexation area is not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. It is adjacent
to other noncontiguous portions of the city. The uroangrowthboundary (UGB) is located
approximately 6oo'feet north of th~,annexation area. The annexation area is designated low-
density residential in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) and is
zoned LDR\UF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay, in Lane County. Upon
the effective date of the annexation, the UF overlay will automatically be removed and the
annexed l"Ul'",Jes will be zoned consistent with the plan designation.
2 Affected territory means the territory descnoed in the petition. ORS 199.415(3)
3 Petition means the d~~""lS required to initiate a bowlllary change and includes, but is not limited to, an initiating
document, legal description, cadastral maps, and information form. ORS 199.415(14), ORS 199.490(4), and OAR
191..0CJ6..0000(3) .'
. · Elector means an individual registered to vote at an address Within the Offected -":'~'J' ORS 199.490(1) aDd (5)
,andORSI99505 i,
LCLGBC Staff Notes Ie sp 08-14) - February 7, 2008
Page IV-A-2 '
ATTACHMENT 1 - 11
.'
'-.....
EXHIBIT B - P10
The anne~ation 'was initiated by thl: City of Springfield on December 3, 2007. An Annexation
Ao-..:..:....ent outlining the agreements between the city and the owner for the provision of urban
services and financing responsibility has been fully executed, for the annexation area
BOUNDARYCO~S~ONRE~~RALS
Boundary commission referrals were sent to the Lane County Land Management Division, Lane
County Environmental Health Division, Lane County Board of Commissioriers, and Rainbow
Water and FIre District.
No referral '<'~puuses were received as of January 30, 2008.
BOUNDARY CO~SS"ON STAND~,RDS - STAFF ANALYSIS
In this section of the staff notes, each applicable boundary w......ission standard is addressed.
These standards,are derived from ORS 199 and the boundary commission's policy administrative
rule (OAR 191, Division 30). ' '
Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the
effects of th!! boundary change on other units of governments. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and,
199.410(3)(c) ,
This, annexation request was flled in accordance with provisions in ORS 199 and was detennined
, to be a valid filing in accordance with OAR 191-006 (adopted administrative rule on boundary
commission filing requirements). The item was placed on the boundary commission's agenda
for February 7, 2008. Notice of the boundary commission's public hearing has been published in
accordance with Oregon law.' Any person may attend'andwill be given a reasonable opportunity
to be heard.
The proposed annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and FIre District. The fire district
contracts with the City of Springfield for fIre services within itS boundaries. Upon the effective
date of the 'annexation, the annexation area will be automatic:ally withdrawn from the fIre district
in accordance with ORS 199.51 0(2)(a) and the city will provide fire services directly to the
annexed property. '
The Metro Plan identifies the city as the ultimate provider of urban services within the UGB.
Policy #18, page ll-C-6, in the Metro Plan recognizes th'!,t as annexations to the city occur,
existing special service districts within the UGB will be dissolved. The continued annexation of
properties to the City of Springfield is consistent with the Metro Plan, which likely wiUresult in
the elimination of several special districts within the urbanizable area. '
UPon annexation, the area will be annexed automatically into the Lane County Metropolitan
Wastewater Service District [ORS 199.51O(2)(c)]. This special district was formed to provide
the financing for the regional wastewater treatment plant serving wastewater users within the
cities of Eugene and Springfield and other users within the urbanizable area
LO..GBC Staff Notes (C SP08-14) ~ February 7, 2008
Page N-A-3
ATTACHMENT 1 - 12
"
EXHIBIT B - P11
Upon annexation, the area will be annexed automatically into the Willamalane Park and
Recreation District, which provides park and recreation facilities and services to territory within
the City of Springfield.
This request is consistent with this standard.
Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of iocal government boundaries to best
meet .the 'needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where
intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long-
range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a)
and (e)
The area in this annexation p,vpvsal is located withIn the acknowledged UGB of the Metro Plan.
'Territory within the UGB ultimately will be within the City of Springfield. Springfield is the unit
of government identified in the Metro Plan to provide urban services to territory in this area. The
proposed annexation is not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield.
Noncontiguous annexations are allowed by state annexation law and provided for in the Metro
Plan if certain criteria are met. The Metro Plan policy for noncontiguous annexation (policy #12,
page II-C-5) requires that noncontiguous annexations meet the following criteria:
a. The area to be annexed will be provided urban service(s), which is (are) desired
immediately by the residents/property ownerS.
b. The area to be annexed can be serviced (with a minimum level of services, as
directed in the Metro Plan) in a timely and cost-efficient manner and is a logical
extension of the city's service deliv,ery system. '
c. The annexation p,vpvsal is accompanied bY"support within the area I',vl'vsed for
annexation from the owners of at least half the land area in the affected territory.
This annexation 'is consistent with boundary commission administrative rule implementing
policies (1), (2), (5), and (7) which recognize annexation to an existing city as the preferred
method of servicing urbanizable land:, "
(1) This policy recognizes cities as the logical providers of urban levels of service
within urban growth boundaries when consistent with the comprehensive plan.
(2) This policy expresses the commission's preference for providing urban services
through annexation to a city in order to provide urban services to urbarnzable
lands.
(5) This policy encourages the provision of urban levels of service within urban
growth boundaries.
LCLGBC Staff Notes (CSP 08 - 14) - February 7, 2008
Page N -A-4
ATTACHMENT 1 - 13
'-
EXHIBIT B - P12
(7) . This policy expresses the corrunission's p";.f".",,ce for annexation to an existing
city over all other alternatives as a means of extending services to urbanizable
lands.
Implementing policy (3) recognizes that in order to meet the long-term objectives of annexing
out to an acknowledged urban lirowth boundary, short-term boundaries are created which are
logical within the context of the future service boundary. In the long term territory within this
geographic area will be annexed to Springfield. Arinexation to the city fulfills the policies
adopted in the Metro Plan of annexing out to the urban growth boundary.
\
. This proposal to annex territory to the City of Springfield is consistent with boundary.
corrunission policies and this standard.
,
Make boundJzty commission determinations which are consistent with acknowledged local
comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in.
the comprehensive plan to meet eristing and futur.e growth.. For major boundJzty changes,
there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financially viIlble. ORS
199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b) and (d)
,
The proposal is within the Metro Plan urban growth 'boundary. The.Metro Plan was
acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development Corrunission (LCDC) in August 1982
and has been subsequently amended. The Metro Plan recognizes annexation as the highest
priority for extending the minimum level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas
(policies #8 and #10, pagell-C-4) and recognizes that ultirilately, all territory within the urban
growth boundary will.be annexed to an existing city (policy #16, page D-C-6).
The annexation area is currently designated low-density residential in the Metro Plan. If the
annexation is "pp<v"ed, the tax lolted youp", ..ies will be rezoned to a lDR, a city zoning district
consistent with the plan designation.
, The annexation area will take advantage of urban service delivery systems that are already iri
place to serve this area The following facilities and services are either available or can be
extended to this annexation area. '
Water - The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and FIre District. The city indicates
,there is existing &-inch water line located in Hayden Bridge, Way. Service to new development
within the annexation area can be provided by this line. ," Following annexation, the City of
Springfield will withdraw the p.vp"uj from the Rainbow Water and FIie District in ..~w.Jance
with ORS 222 and the Springfield Utility Board (SUB) will'provide services to the annexation
area. An intergovernmental a&""...ent between the water district and'SUB and state law will
determine the orderly transition of services and finances between the two service providers.
Electricity :.... Springfield Utility Board (SUB) provides electric service to developed properties in
this area of south Springfield. New devel~p...""t in the annexation area will be served by SUB.
LCLGBC Staff Notes (e sp 08 -14) - February 7, 2008
Page IV -A-S '
ATTACHMENT 1 -14
EXHIBIT B - P13
police services - Springfield staff indicates that Police currently provide service to other
p'vp".Jes in this general area already inside the city. After annexation, this proposal area will
receive police services on an equal basis with properties mside the city. InfIll annexations and
development in this area will increase the efficiency of servIce delivery to this area
"
FIre and emerl!encv services - Fire protection is currently I!rovided to the annexation area by the
Rainbow Water and FIre District. This special district contracts with the City, of Springfield for
fire services to territory within the district's boundaries. Upon annexation, the annexing area will
be withdrawn from the fire district and Springfield will !provide fire services directly to the
annexation area.. Springfield fire stations are located near Pheasant A venue and Hayden Bridge
Way, S 47111 Street and Main Street, and S 6S111 Street and Main Street.
Emergency medical transport (ambulance) services are provided on a regional basis by Eugene,
Springfield, and Lane ,Rural Fire/Rescue to centt:aI Lane County, The annexation area will
continue to receive this se!"ice consistent with the adopted ambulance ,service area (ASA) plan.
Mutual aid agreements have been adopted by the three regiqnal ASA providers to provide backup
coverage for each other's jurisdictions.
Parks and recreation - Upon annexation area to the City df Springfield, the annexing area will
also be annexed to'the Willamalane Park and'Recreation District. ' Park and recreation services
are provided to the City of Springfield by the park district. Indoor recreation facilities, such as
the Willamalane Park Swim Center, Lively Park Swim Center, Memorial Building Community
Center, and Willamalane Adult Activity Center will be available to residents as new development
occurs. The park district offers various after-school and other programs for children at schools
and parks throughout .the community. Also available',are pathways and several categories of
parks, including community parks, sports parks, special use. parks, and natural area parks. There
is one park, currently located in the '\Iicinity of the annexation area, Royal Delle, a 2.7&-acre
neighborhood park on Blackstone Street. Other nearby recreational opportunities include
Harvest Landing and Page Park. ' .
Schools - Springfield School District 19 serves this area. Ebsting schools-Guy'Lee elementary,
Hamlin and Springfield high--serve this neighborhood; however, the annexation area does not
contain any residential dwellings and should not generate any additional demands on the school
system. "
Wastewaler - Springfield staff indicated tat the existing church within the annexation area is not
currently connected to the city wastewater system. There are three possible counectiori points for
extension of wastewater service to the annexation area: an existing &-inch line within Blackstone.
Street northeast of the annexation area; an S-inch line that extends south of Blackstone Street
roughly parallel with and about SO feet offset from the east property line of the annexation area;
and an S-inch line at the intersection of Mint Meadow Way and Old Orchard Lane
(app,vAimately 500 feet east of the southeastern comer of the 'annexation area). The public
wastewater lines within ,and extending from Blackstone Street are located within the city limits.
However, extension of a wastewater line from the intersection of Mint Meadow Way and Old
LCLGBC Staff Notes Ie SP08 - ;4) -'February '1, 200S
Page IV-A-6
ATTACHMENT 1 - 15
EXHIBIT B - P14
Orchard Lane along Hayden Bridge Way would be outside the city limits until the right-of-way is
annexed.
Upon the annexation effective date, the area will be annexed automatically to the Lane County
Metropolitan Wastewater Service District [ORS 199.51O(2)(c)].
Stormwater - Springfield staff indicated that roof runoff is directed 'onto the site and passes into a
series of catch basins within the site parking lot. From the catch basin system, stormwater
infiltrates into a drywell. There is an existing IS-inch stormwater line adjacent to the annexation
area within Hayden Bridge Way. Approval from Lane County is needed before connection to
this system may occur. Any further development or redevelopment ill the annexation area will
require ..pp.vp,;ate stormwater management techniques in a~cordance with city standards.
Streets - The annexation area abuts Hayden Bridge Way on its south side, which is fully
improved with curb and giltter, pavement,' sidewalks, and street lights. An interconnected
transportation system will be required in order to p'rovide access and a tninsportation system for
the provision of fIre and life safety services to and from the ,annexing p' Vp'" ..ies: Hayden Bridge
Way is not located within the Springfield city limits. .
Solid waste mana!!ement - Private firms and individuals collect and transport solid waste to the
Lane County administered landfill.
Communication facilities - Various providerS offer both' wire and wireless communication
services in the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. Exis~ng providers and those entering the
market have the cap~bility to provide service to future devel9pment in this area
Land use controls - The pwp""j is within Springfield's Portion of the urban growth boundarj.
Through an intergovernmental agreeinent between Lane County and the City of Springfield, the
city already has planning and building jurisdiction for this property. The city will continue to
administer land use controls after annexation. .
The minimum level of key urban, facilities and services, as defined on page V-3 of the Metro
Plan, are either immediately available or can be provided W:ithin a reasonable future time frame
as needed. This request is consistent,~ith this standard.
Consider the comprehensive plan's :economic, demographic, and sociological.trends and
projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposal ORS199.410(3)(d) and
'199.462(1)
~
The annexation p~vpv~al is consistent with the Metro Plan, as it is an incremental step in
implementing the long-range plan for this area. The urban growth boundary, land uses, and
policies in the Metro Plan, were developed to meet the' future needs of the metropolitan
community. The existing and proposed uses are consistent with the longcrange plan for the area
and w1lJ fulfill the growth policies in the Metro Plan and in Oregon law.' .
LCLGBC Staff Notes (C sp 08 - 14) - February 7, 200S
Page IV-A-7
ATTACHMENT 1 - 16
EXHIBIT B - P15
This request is consistent with this boundarycorrunission st~dard.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The boundary commission staff recommends that the ;. vpv.ed annexation to the City of ,
Springfield (BC File C SP OS - 14) be "pp.v..ed as submilted based on the folJowing fIndings
and reasons.
The, findings are organized to respond to boundary corrunission standards outlined in ORS 199,
the boundary commission law. The folJowing fIndings and reasons are based on approval of the
request as submilted. If the boundary corrunission modifies or denies the p.vpvsal, the fIndings
and reasons would need to be adjusted. ,.
FIndinl!s:
I. This proposal was initiated with the boundary cornn:iission by the City of Springfield after'
receiving consents from the property owner on De~ember 31, 2007, in accordance with
ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B). The proposal was found to 1:le a valid filing under OAR 19]-006.
2. The proposed annexation, as submilted, .included two tax lots en 7S R03W S23 Map 34
tax lots 12600 and ]2700) comprising approximately 4.13 acres and was owned by the
Intemational Church of Foursquare Gospel. The annexation area was developed with a
church facility and was not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield.
3. The land use designation for the annexation area was low-density residential in the
Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan).
4. The annexation area was zoned lDRIUF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe,
in Lane County. After the annexation effective date, the property was rezoned lDR
consistent with the land use designati!>n.
Provide an impartial forum f~r resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the
effects of the boundary change on other units of governmenL ORS'199.410(1)(b) and
199.410(3)(c)
5. The boundary commission held a public hearing on February 7, 2008. Notice of the
public hearing was given in accordance with ORS 199 provisions. AIl interested parties
were given a reasonable opportunity to be heard,
6. After annexation to Springfield,' the annexation area would be withdrawn from the
Rainbow Water and FIre District. There would be some financial impact on the district
because it derives its water revenue from user fees and the annexation area was developed
with a church. The annexation area would be withdrawn 'from the district through
separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in a(;cordance with ORS 222. On behalf
LCLGBC Staff Notes (e sp 08 :"14) -February 7, 200S
Page IV-A-S
ATTACHMENT 1 ~17
/
'EXHIBIT B - P16
of the City of Springfield, the Springfield Utility Board ,provided service directly to the
annexation area.
7. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed automaticaIly to the Lane
County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District in accordance with ORS I 99.5 I 0(2)(c).
8;' Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area was annexed automatically to the
Willamalane Parks and,Recreation District in accordance with ORS 199.5JO(2)(c).
9. This request was consistent with this standard.
Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to' best
meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where
intergovernmental options are identified and make decisio'lJs based on the most effective long-
range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and, 199.410(3)(a)
and (e) ,
10. Annexation to the City of Springfield was identified in the acknowledged Metro Plan as
the Preferred method for providing key urban facilities and services to the arCa within
Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary. '
1 I. Annexation to an existing city was the method for extending urban facilities and services
to urbanizable land in the boundary commission's policy administrative rule,
implementing policies (I), (2), (5), and (7). "
12.' The proposed annexation was the means of boundary change outlined in the Metro Plan
and the boundary corrunission administrative" rules for ultimately providing urban
facilities and services to this territory. . Annexation of tax lotted property fulfilled the
Metro Plan policies of annexing out to the urban groWth boundary.
, I '
I
13. The y.vpvsed annexation met the criteria for noncontiguous annexations in the boundary
commission law and the Metro Plan. ..
14. ' This request was consistent ~ith boundary corrunisslon policies and this standard.
Make boundary commission determinations which are consistent with acknowledged local
. . ~
" comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in,
the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future growth. For major boundary changes,
there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is financially viable. ORS
199.410(l)(d), 199.410(3)(b), and (d)
15. .The annexation area was within the urban growth boundary of the acknowledged Metro
Plan [Land Conservation !lld Development Corrunission (LCDC) action in 1982 and as
'subsequently amended]. Annexation of tax lotted p.vp"..j assisted, in fulfilling the Metro
Plan policies of annexing out to the urban growth boundary,
LCLGBC Staff Notes lesP08-'14)-February 7, 2008
Page IV-A-9
ATTACHMENT 1 -18
EXHIBIT B - P17
16. The Metro Plan recognized annexation to the City of Springfield as the highest priority
for extending the minimum level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas.
17. The proposed use (church) was consistent with, the policies in the Metro Plan requiring
urban levels of development within the urban growth boundary.
IS. The City of Springfield indicated that the required services outlined ,in Metro Plan policy
#S, page ll-C-4 and defined on page V-3, were either available or can be provided in a
timely manneL
19. This request was consistent with this standard.
Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and
projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to tile proposal. ORS 199.410(3)(d) and
199.462(1)
20. The annexation proposal was consistent with the Metro Plan, as it was an incremental '
step in implementing the long-range plan for this area. The urban growth boundary, land
uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were develoPed to meet the future needs of the
m,,;"'vpvlitan community. The proposed use was consistent with the long-range plan for
the area and fulfilled the growth policies in the Metro Plan and in Oregon law.
21. This request was consistent with this standard.
Reasons:
I. The proposal was supported by the City. of Springfield and the Y'"Y''' ~j owner.
2. The proposal was consistent with the LCDC acknowledged Metro Plan.
3. The services required in the Metro Plan were either available or could be provided in a
tirilely manner when needed.
4. The proposal was consistent willi past boundary commission actions supporting
annexation to the City of Springfield.
5. The p>vpvsal was consistent with boundary corrunission administrative rule policies.
pr: LCBC: L VlOS M20081CSP0814 SN,DQC
Uut Saved: Fd",m'Y J. 2008
LCLGBC Staff Notes (e sp 08 - 14) - Febrnary 7, 200S
PageN-A-1O
ATTACHMENT 1 - 19
EXHIBIT B - P18
MapNo.JV-A-l Vicinity Map
Annexation 10 Springfield (International
Chun:h ofFOIll>'luare Gospel)
CSP08-14
, LCLGBC Staff Notes (e sp 08 -14; - February 7, 200S
PageIV-A-1I
ATTACHMENT 1 - 20
L
I~' '~'~,"~,'~
~.. : ~~"~~"\~"'~
~~~~~~,\0-~\~\\
~~~, , ''''''':\~'X
."~~'"' ~~'1
.'S~~~\~ '~.:t:'"
.'~'<i'\'i""~'t W"2~{/
'~'iti::~'ii&\~; ':,
, ~~~~~',:',X~::'I~~\~'
~~~i.''\\W
:.l~'\\'1
''''..''~'''';'''''~~
.,.~-~~~~,:*:,
~..:;:~ \\,,\ I'~" -~,;:,\,~
. : "'r'~,' I. 'WI., ,~, .,)., .
,,~~~y~ten j3ridge Way
L~~ L .,~ ., J'.
J_~L _ i.. I
ANNEXA nON AREA
i Includes TLs 12600, 12700, 17-03-23-34 ,,' oW
-J Owned by the International Church _"'-- _ --..,. ~
of Foursquare Gospel , ", A, oW
BCFileCSP08-14' . i-l
-'-'-. - .'T I n] , ~" '5.-.1 r
, _ tl..,"ilc.j.u~v:l
i
,- Blackstone Sl
---
\
...
ml
~I
0,
'1701'
,~
I
Royal
DeDe
'PiUk
.-
I
I
, ,/'
I
,
.~,
,I
EXHIBIT B - P19
Map No. IV -A-2 ' Site Map
Annexation 10 Springfield (International
Church of FOImquare Gospel)
CSP08-J4
. .'. :~.'::h.~~:,...f~'~fj
-
II
I!!
-
o
'Yo
~~,.,,'
;l'0;~t'*'r'~'
'::~,0~;:'i:.::'~:>2-:n~;!1 :
ne4k
.;"..;.\.n-~~..
LCLGBC Staff Notes (CSP08-14) - February 7, 200S
Page IV-A-12 ATTACHMENT 1 - 21
EXHIBIT B - P20
RESOLUTION NO 07-59
A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXA nON OF CERTAlN TERRiTORY
TO TIffi CITY OF SPRINGFIELD AND REQUESTING TIIAT TIffi LANE COUNTY
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE TIffi ANNEXA nON
WHEREAS, the City received a request to aIinex approximately 4.13 acres into the City of Springfield OIi November
22, 2006, said tenitory being described as follows: .
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 23, Map 34, Tax Lots 12600 and 12700 (commonly known as 600
Hayden Bridge Way; Springfield) as generally depicted and more particularly described in EXhibit A of this
Resolution,
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is within the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth Boundary, and is.
adjacent to the City Limits; and, '
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by ORS I 99.490(2)(a)(A) to initiate annexation upon receiving cons~nt
in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be annexed and written consent
from more than half of the owners of land in the territory proposed to be annexed, who also own more than half of
the land in the territory proposed to be annexed and of real property therein representing more than half of the
assessed value of all real property in the tenitory proposed to be amiexed;
WHEREAS, one hundred percent of the property ownerS of the territory signed a consent to annex (Exhibit B); and,
WHEREAS, there are no registered electors in the tenitory to be ann~xed (Exhibit C); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield Development Code 6.070; ORS 222.111 and other
, applicable Oregon. Revised Statutes to initiate annexation when the terntory in the annexation proposal can be
provided with the minimum key level of urban facilities and services in an orderly' and efficieot manner as defined in
the Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan Policy 8, Page II-B4, and where there will be a logical area and
time within which to deliver urban services and facilities; and,' ,
WHEREAS, minimum level of key urban services and facilities are defined in the Eugene-Springfieid Metro Area
,General Plan, Page V-3 as sanitary sewer service, stormwater service, solid waste management, water service, fire
and emergency medical services, police }'.~~,,~;';on, city-wide parks and recreation programs, electric service, land use
controls, communication facilities and services, and public schools on a district-wide basis; and,
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed can be immediatel)j, provided with a minimum level of key urban
facilities and services, with the exception of City stormwater and sanitary sewer services which are available within
'public streets near the property; and, ,
WHEREAS provision of City stormwater and sanitary sewer services has been arranged through an Annexation
Agreement that has been negotiated with City staff and the property owner, as described in Attachment 2, Case
Number LRP2006-00030; and,
WHEREAS, an Annexation Agreement has been proposed for execution by the City of Springfield and the property
, owner (International Church of the Foursquare Gospel operating as Springfield Faith Center) which will memorialize
the OWner's commitment, agreement and obligation to meet the City's requirements for provision of the minimUm
level of key urban services and facilities as required for an affinnative City recommendation for the annexation
request; and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forward this resolution supporting the applicant's annexation request
to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission when an Annexation Agreement is entered into by the
City of Springfield and International Church of the Foursquare Gospel (Owner);
, ,
ATTACHMENT 1 - 22
~\
EXHIBIT B - P21
. ,
NOW TIIEREFORE BASED ON TIIE FOREGOING RECITALS, TIIE COMMON COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: "
, Section]: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby recommend approval of the annexation of the
subject territory to the City by the Lane'County Local Government Boundary Commission, Lane County, Oregon, said
territory being described as follows:
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section23, Map 34, Tax Lots 12600 and 12700 (commonly known as 600
Hayden Bridge Way, Springfield) as generally depicted and,more particularly descnoed in Exhibit A of this .
Resolution.
Section 2: This resolution shall take effect upon adoption by the Common Council of the City of Springfield and
approval by the Mayor.
Section 3: The City, Council recommends that the Boundary Commission approve the proposed annexation upon
execution of an Annexation Agreement as descnbed in the recitals. '
Section 4: The City Manager is hereby authorized to sign the Final Annexation Agreement which memorializes the
Owner's commitment, agreement and obligation to meet the City's requirements for provision of the minimum level of,
key urban services and facilities.
, Section 5: The City Manager shall forwardthis Resolution supporting:the applicant's annexation request to the Lane
County Local Government Boundary Commission. .
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 3rd day of December, 2007; by a vote of
6 Jor and 0 against
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 3d day of December, 2007.
AtTEST:
~~~~
."
.fhv..t~
City Recorrl€J
I MayorU
f,'~"}':t;...r., n ~. p,i1r;oOIlED
~ _. . . ,_ ~ ~ . "" ... u(. 11\ .
A~-:' i 0 IORtii
. \M"~..) L~"
Of,,"': ~~~2.~ J o.
nf'FICE OF c,n ATTORNEY
City of Springfield. Oregon
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY
~~JI'-- -
City Rctorder
ATTACHMENT 1 - 23
,:, """ ,~'~'*' "","~",," .
J ~~I~::; ~"..'t ~~"\~~"""\~\\"'\'"
~ '" ' ".<c;"". .. ~.
l~.~'~~~'.,,,',,,,,~:~:~ii:%:\'~:(
~'.:~~~R'~"""Ii"""'''''''
:).'i.~',,, ~,,:,\,:\~:,;,,,,,
~~~\,,' ~ , i8',":~10
"'~'\~*;;~-..
~~.\~~\~~~
~~~~~'*~"~\~~~.-
!~" "'h"'~~'~
~~ ~.~".,:,\, ,~~~
~ ~,~,,"''', '" ,,-
',:".,~~:)~' ~~"'~~'+'~''''''''''\\I''~
~.&.~' "''>;,"'''''''''':i',\'t'
~~~~. ~ ,~\~~ttt:.~~
I~~'t~~~~~~
$~\~~~~~~~~~\'\~~'~~~~~~
~~'\\%\.~\:~a\:'~~ti
""\"""""""""~"",,,,,,~,,,,,,,,,.. 'ii
~''\'~'..;''''~'\'\'''~~'\~~,..:~..~~~. ~
'~'~.~~'~~i
-..~\1t
Hayden Bridge Way
ail
~I
I U)/
I
I
Cambridge St.
nr
j
-
G>
I!!
ii.i
-"'
JIl>
~
I
I
. NatlD=k
EXHIBIT B - P22
J!.Anu>.u A
'ail-/
~I ,___
_UJ~ L .
----..
:e,:
.lle
Q:;j
h-
",.,
....
.'; i
" I
'.'
'". ," r
oJ
Blacl<Stone Sl'
,,' " 'I
,
I
~ '
Royaldel Lane, ,', '
. .' ~
.',. I."", ','.
.o;
.. ,"
. I,.
" ....
'. :'~"\'.~~~.
'.,
.\",
.'f' '"
River Knoll Way 'J~,
i~:~~
;.'
1/1
. ,
.:."
o!l
~
1Il8 '
... J! '
Ci5 !.
5 i
..... OJ
, t,
,N'.'"
~" ~"~..":" '.J
,. "~. ".:-
i:
Legal Description
Beginning at an iron pipe set 90 feet West ~d 600 feet North of-a point 2,823.48 feet (42.78 chains) South of the
Northeast comer of the Jacob HaIstead Donation Land Claim No. 47, Natifica.ti'on No. 3810, in Section 23,
, Township 17 South,' Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, Lane, County, Oregon; thence South 01" 01' 15"
East 90 feclto an iron pipe; thence North 89" 53' West 31.5 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 00" 01' IS" East
150.50Jeetto an iron pipe; thence South 89" 53' East 127.59 feet to a point on the West line of the William
Spencer Donation Land Claim Number 50 that is niarked by an iron'pipe; thence South 00"13' 30" West 319.50
feet along last said West line to a point on the north margin of Hayden Bridge Way as said margin is offset 40.00
feet northerly by perpendicular measurement from the centerline of said road; thence along said north margin of
Hayden Bridge Way, North 89" 53' West. 369.77 feet, more or less, to the Southeast comer of Lot 2, Block 6 of
"Royal Delle", as platted and recorded in Book 29 at Page 21 in the Plat Records of Lane County, State of Oregon; .
thence North 00" 01'15" West along the East line of said Block 6 and its Northerly extension 560 feet to an iron
pipe; and thence South 89" S3' East 27S feet returning to the point of beginning and containing 4.13 acres more or
less. '
ATTACHMENT 1 - 24
EXHIBIT B
FORM #1
'.'
, PETITION
ANNJ:XATIONTO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
EXHIBIT B - P23
TO: LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
We, the undersigned, constitute the oWners of at least one-half of the land area of the property described
in the lrtt.~hment llIlIlked "Exh1"bit A" AND
, -
We desire to be annexed to the City of Springfield. A map is a.ttached marked "Exhibit B," showing the
affected territory and its ieIationship to the present city liInit boundaries.
, "
The annexation constitutes a minor'boundary change IInder the Boundary Commission Act arid should
therefore be cansi~d by the Boundary Cnmmk.ion and, after study, a Final Order should be entered by the
BoUndary Ccm""'~C!~~on. '" .' . . I. ~ . '.
By~4t.j'
~ J/) . cretary
B~ ~' ..--> '
J;j"hcl J. Gupt n, t. Controller'
':8'1,
Date_T,"~ ,:;
Date
'nQ~
Julv 6. 7nnn
Date
By Date.
MAP# 17 -l:l3 -..2.. ~ - J'4 LOT# (J..f- 00
MAP# 17- 03 -~J - set LOT#- J). 76l)
:
With the above signature, I am v'erifying ~hat I have the authority:to
consent to the annexation on my own behalf or on behalf of my firm,
agency or trust. '
s
ATTACHMENT 1 -25
EXHIBIT B - P24
VERIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS
I have caused a: search to be made of the assessment and taxation records, Lane County ,
Department of Assessment and Taxation (A&1), on 17-03-23-34-12600 and 17-03-23-34-12700.
, ,
'Those records reflect that the International Church of the' FourSauare Gomel are,the owners
" of record of the property identified by the tax lots' described on the attached sheet. . A&T is not
, .
responsible for subsequent deed activity which may not yet be reflected on the A&T
""~p,.rterized taX roll.
&~)#i)n~
Lane cminty Depar1ml:nt of Assessment lIIId Taxation
. . "
11/14/07 "
Date
I:\A TINFO\Bu.;n""'ProC~1A'+'W~Am'froJIetty2~eri:fication form.doc
, 6/27/07 . "
PETITION I.D.
PEuuON FOR rlI ANNEXATION TO DISTRicrS' 0 FORMAUON OF DlSTRlCT
GO SIGNATURE SHEET
IQ THE C~UNTY ~LEcr~ONS FILING ~FF1CE~ISTRICT OP- .~ J'oo.::- ......, 4-=,'{' I' '" \ 6
, ..0. U-
~GN ~J!'.
l.. .t6 ~.42.,
',-- U
3.
l'
s.
6.
r
:2 7.
B.
I 9.
!::.IO.
t1.
12.
13.
14.
tS..
t6.
17.
lB.
19.
THIS IS A CITY I DISTRICT
, PETITION. SIGNERS OF THIS
PAGE MUST BE REGISTERED
VOTERS IN LANE COUNTY ONLY.
DATI: IIGNED
"OJDAYIY~
UlmDfCJ:',APDRnl
nJlJ:ET. NUMBO A CITY
P.OP
DWNU
..a.
ow,...
CJRCULA TOR',S VERIPtCA TJON
, ~
THIS VERIFICATION MUST BE
SIGNED BY THE CIRCULA.TOR
SHEET NUMBER
PRINT NAME
J,YIAP & TAX LOT
. L7 ~o:J".A:' .Jfl' I:z:.'bO
7/6/06 -I!!P J. Ra'akin. ~aat". Rec. k910 ~ Sunaet Bhd1-.... -!.~.l'-.Ty /] yo!l<1
J 1',,; u .'
/" ,-7/06/0fl Lvnda J. GuntDn. A~Jn. DB Anltelea. .CA 9(Q2./; I r
I I
I I
II
II
I. I
I
"
1',
,,... I'
"
.1.
I'
I
I
I
I
ANNEXATION TO DISTRICTS I FORMATION OF D~TRICT .."... .ON .
I, (print circulator'" name) _]'" r'".. r--:-,,,,,~..... .~ ....L~ __ ,hereby verllY every penon who sIgned
lhi. .he.1 did "0 In my p......nc. a ',b.li.v. .ac.::,.rs n is a r.gister.d vol.r in tho city I district
SlGNATi.mnOF CIRCI)LAT '__ " ~S::: ~ .
c. .%J?tf-~ ~'<T..A _ ~~. R.d_
.c-.........,-..J...... ~p. .<"'1...~,,-, A A.. CI
CIRCULATOR'S ADDRESS (.trc'
Ily'andzlp code)
...'
0
11
:~ .
0
-
8
:8
.Il
0
;>:
1 ~
" :c
Il to
... =l
0
II C')
0
-S
~ 'U
!l ~
."
. 'il
, ...
':iJ ~
!l '"
i B '"
;<
'01 . J:
-
!.O
-
-i
!.O
it
~ ~ . ~
1~, "
o _.!..:....J
EXHIBIT B - P26
FORM #2A
'CERTIFICATION OF REGISTEREO VOTERS
I hereby certify that if - signatures on the attached petition are registered voters and reside in
the area describedm the petition. These signatures represent not less than 50 percent of the registered voters
residing within the annexation or withdrawal area described in this petition.
~~ .l..\" .;2.QC-'
..";...,,..~~~~
,~~~'\r ~-!.^
'<:'l';::"'~J'~J'
.:' -!' ~
.~ ~\:EAL !?;'
. ~';...4 0
\:.. . ;,} A
t.:"':.. ___ 9$le:
;'1:;~Ii.,-:'rt, O~
-,~
~..A-~~\
Ocputfcr Clerk " ,
Lane County, Oregon
Date
ATTACHMENT 1 - 28
EXHIBIT B - P27
Informational Attachment
For the proposed annexation of %4.13 acres of ...~.._;I located at 600 Hayden Bridge Way. The area is described
on Lane County Assessor's Map 17-03-23-34, TI.. 12600 & 12700. The legal description of the property follows:
Beginning at an iron pipe set 90 feet West and 600 feet North ofa point 2,823.48feet (42.78 chliins) South of the
Northeast comer of the Jacob HaIstead Donation Land Claim No.4 7, Notification No. 38 I 0, in Section 23;
Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian,' Lane County, Oregon; thence South 0 I · 0 I' 15"
East 90 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 89" 53' West 315 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 00. 01' 15" East
150.50 feet to an iron pipe; thence Soirt!i 89. 53' East 127.59 feet to a point on the West line of the William
Spencer Donation Land Claim Number 50 that is marked by an iron pipe; thence South 00.13' 30" West 319.50
feet along last said West line to a point on the north margin of Hayden Bridge Way as said margin is offset 40.00
feet northerly by ..'" .t'''udicuIar measurement from the centerline of said road; thence along said north margin of
Hayden Bridge Way, North 89. 53' West 369.77 feet, more or less, to the Southeast comer of Lot 2, Block 6 of
"Royal Delle", as platted and recorded in Book 29 at Page 21 in the Plat Records of Lane County, State of Oregon; ,
thence North 00. 01' 15" West along the East line of said Block 6 and its Northerly extensi'on 560 feet to an iron
pipe; and thence South 89. 53' East 275 feet returning to the point of beginning and containing 4.13 acres more or
" less.' ,
Zoning
The Low DensitY Residential (LOR) zoning of the subject ... ~.t""';Y and existing use is consistent with the
Mw;'u..vlitan Area General Plari (Metro Plan) and the City's Development Code. ChUI1:hes are listed as a
, Discretionary Use in the LOR District A site review permit for the chim:h was issued by Lane County in July,
1984 and upheld by the Lane County Hearings Official in September, 1984 (Case PA13l5-84).
Sanitary Sewer
The existing chUI1:h is not currently connected to the city sanitary sewer system. There are three possible
connection points for extension of sanitary sewer to the ... w.....;J: an existing public sanitary sewer line within
Blackstone Street northeast of the property; ,a public sanitary sewer line that extends south of Blackstone Street
roughly parallel with and about 80 feet offset from the east .t';up...;j line of the site; and a sanitary sewer line at the
intersection of Mint Meadow Way and Old Orchard Lane ('"t'.t';.,....:....ately 500 feet east of the southeastern comer of
the site). The public sanitary sewer lines within and extending from Blackstone Street are located within the city
limits. However, extension of a sanitary sewer line from the intersection of Mint Meadow Way and Old Orchard
Lane would require approval of an extra:;,,,u;~.:aI extension along Hayden Bridge Way.
Solid Waste'Management
The City and Sanipac have an exclusive franchise arrangement for gBrbage service inside the city limits. Upon
annexation, Sanipac will serve this property.
Water Service ,
Rainbow Water District is currently serving the site with water and will continue to do so until the July following
the completion of annexation, at which time SUB Water will be the provider. Water service to the property
originates from a 6-inch water main in Hayden Bridge Way. .
Electric
SUB Electric is currently serving the site with power from an overhead line running north-south along the western
boundary of the site.
Fire and Life Safety ,
The Fire Marshal has reviewed the application lII:ld has determined that fire and emergency services are available to
this .t'. ~.t'''' 'I. The building has an existing fire sprinkler system and there is a fire hydrant at the sciutheast comer of
the site. '
Police P. _;,,_:':OD
Upon annexation, the area will receive police protection from the City of Springfield. Police ...u;"w:':on and
. "o.t'u..sc to priority ca1ls can be pro~t; A'tim~~ ~n~.tion consistent with service ~on throughout
EXHIBIT B - P28
the city.
Parla and Recreation Programs
After annexation to the City of Springfield, the subject l'" ~l""';J will,bi: within the Wi11.m.lane Parle and
R............;.;oo District boundary. City residents receiv~ park and ._.....;.;00 services from the District The District
v......:...., two aquatic centerS, a Community Center, an Adult Activity Center, and 31 parks containing a variety of
outdoor recreational amenities. There is one park currentlY located in the vicinity of the annexation area: RoyaJ
Delle, a 2.76-'acre neighborhood park al 401 Blackstone Street. Among other features, the park contains an open
play area, basketball court, playground, picnic shelter and tables, and night lighting. Other nel!Tby ._.....;.;onal
opportunities include Harvest Landing and Page Parle. A complete listing ofWill:un.I.ne's parks and programs can
be found on-line al www.Willamalane.orn" oral 736-4044.
Although the site is zoned LOR, there are no occupied dwellings on the site and none are proposed. For this
reason, the ... ~ .....j should not genernte any additional demands for park and recreation facilities.
- Land Use Controls
, The City of Springfield Development Services Department bas provided all planning and building functions for the
owners of the subject p.;'p~.j. The City of Springfield DeVelopment Services r:~t""=ent will continue to provide
, land use control for the site after the annexation.
Communication Facilities
Qwest and AT&T currently provide communications in the area for cable .service and an array of wireless
companies provide different communication services. The City bas no exclusive franchise arrangements with
telecommunication or wireless companies. The field is c.,~...;;tive and therefore guarantees a wide selection.
, ,
Public Schools
Public School services are available through School District 19. Page Elementary School is located just to the east
of the subject property. As stated previously, the site does not contain any dWellings and should not generate any
additional demands on the school system. '
Stonnwater Control
Roof runoff is directed onto the site, and passes into a series of ~ch basins within the site parking lot From the
catch basin system, stonnwater infiltrates into a drywell. There are existing public stormwater facilities adjacent to
the site within Hayden Bridge Way. Any future deVelopment or redevelopment on this site will require Ql""'~t":atC
stormwaler management techniques in accordance with City standards; Approval of an ex.. ..,...u;;;oriaJ extension is
not required to extend private ...v.~nater lines through unin~.pv._J areas to serve the site.
ATTACHMENT 1 - 30
Office of the Secremy of Slate
BILL BRADBURY
3-_":"", of Slate
EXHIBIT B - P29
Axchiv.. Di'risilll1
MARY BETH HERKERT
DUector
800 Summer Sl NE
Salem, Oregon 97310
(503)373-(J']()1
Facsimile (503) 3~53
February 19, 2008
Lane County Local
Government Boundary Commission
Paula L Taylor
99 East Broadway, Suite 400
, Eugene OR 97401-3111
Dear Ms. Taylor:
Please be advised that we have received and filed the following Annexation(s):
Ordinance Number
Our File Number
Date
C SP 08-14 (Springfield)
EC EU 07-50 (Eugene)
AN 2008-0018
AN 2008-0019
02/14/2008
02/14/2008 '
Please verify the effective date(s) for these annexations through the application of
ORS 199.519 .
Our assigned file number(s) areincluded with the above information.
Sincerely,
;;tVk~~ I3~..JL
Unda Bjornstad
Official Public Documents '.
cc: Lane County Oerk
ODOT /Highway Division
PRC/Population Research Center
Revenue Cartography Section
WWWServer - http://orcweb.so..sblte.or.us.InlemetE.maiI-reference.arouves_te.or.us
Oregon Genealogy Lisbrerv - or-roo_14.sos.state.or.us
ATTACHMENT 1 - 31
"
,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF SPRINGFIELD
,
Notice is hereby given that the Common Council of the City of Springfield will conduct a public
hearing and first reading of an ordinance on Monday, March 10, 2008, at 7:00 p,m, in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon 97477; and a second reading and'
adoption on Monday, March 17, 2008 at the same place and time, on the matter of withdrawing
. the following annexed property from the Rainbow Water and Fire District:
File 07-35 AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS
NEPUTE, LOCATED IN WEST SPRINGFIELD, NORTH OF KELLOG ROAD AND NORTHWEST
OF THE INTERSECTION WITH POLTAVA STREET AND INVOLVING APPROXlMATELY1,03
ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAX LOT 800; T17S R03W S34 MAP 22; HERETOFORE ANNEXED
TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT.
File 07-60 AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS
TROTTER LOCATED IN WEST SPRINGFIELD, EAST OF ANDERSON LANE AND SOUTH OF
KELLOGG ROAD AND INVOLVING APPROXIMATELY 0.45 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAX LOT
600 T17S R03W S33 MAP 11; HERETOFORE ANNEXED. TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT.
File 07-64 AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS
EVANS/BETZlOAK DALE AVENUE LOCATED IN THE GATEWAY AREA OF NORTWEST
SPRINGFIELD, WEST OF GAME FARM ROAD AND INCLUDING PROPERTIES OWNED BY
EVANSIBETZ AND THAT PORTION OF OAKDALE AVENUE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
BETWEEN GAMEFARM ROAD AND PHEASANT BOULEVARD. THE WITHDRAWAL
INVOVLVES APPROXIMATELY 0,69 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAX LOTS 2500,2600 AND
2700, T17S R03W S22 MAP 42 AND 0.45 ACRES OF OAKDALE AVENUE RIGHT OF WAY
(1.14 ACRES TOTAL); HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE
~RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT. , ,
- . - ~... .
, File 08-14 AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS
~LINTERNATI6NAL -CHURCH-OF-FOORSQUAREGOSPEIl, LOCATED IN NORTH
..L'LL SPRINGFIElD; NORTH-OF HAYDEN-BRIDGE ROAD, EAST-OF 5TH STREET, WEST OF 71t1
~ STREET AND INVOLVING APPROXIMATELY 4.13 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS TAXS LOT 12600
~\... AND 12700, T17S R03W S23 MAP 34 AND OTHERWISE KNOWN AS 600 HAYDEN BRIDGE
ROAD, SPRINGFIELD; HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM
THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT. '
The properties are contained in, and are a part of, the Rainbow Water District. The City desires
that the properties so annexed be withdrawn from this district and that the City assume
proportionate liability for the part of the district so withdrawn. The City has authority under
Springfield Development Code Section 5-7,60 and ORS 222,520 to 222.575 to withdraw territory
from the water district.
Testimony may be submitted to the Springfield Development Services Department, 225 Fifth
Street, Springfield, Oregon 97477 until 5:00 p.m. on March 10, 2008; and/or you may testify
during the public input portion of the hearing, If you have any questions, please contact Jim
Donovan of the Development Services Department t 541)"7. 66~
nning Manager
RG - Please publish February 29, March 3, March 7 and lII1,arch 14, 2008