The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMiscellaneous PLANNER 3/7/2008 t"; \, ,.... ANNEXATION DISTRIBUTION SHEET , -' Affidavit by: Brenda Jones DSD- Planning Division lv' ed' -fY1M tilt 1 ,.?04, ' Date Rece 'ih7 . ==>.... Name with Boundary Commission Annexation Number and/or Final Order Number: Planner: BJ r r ' EC SP 08-16(Expedited) Jackson; C SP 08-14 International Church of Foursquare Gospel EC SP 07-64 (Expedited) Evans/Betzl Oakdale Avenue EX S 07-61 lExpedited) Anderson LanefTrotter EC SP 07-60 lExpedited) Anderson LanefTrotter ------r EC SP,07-44 (Expedited) Progress Investment Group LLC ,/ _!'~ ,SE..9Z-35 (Expedited) Nepute , C SP 07-34 Horton C SP 07-32 White EC SP 07-02 (Expedited) Crane Resolution #07-57 Final Order # ,1332 Resolution #07-48 Resolution # 07--46 Resolution # 07-46 Resolution # 07-37 Resolution # 07-26 Final Order # 1315 Final Order # 1314 Resolution # 06-39 Jim Donovan, UP Supervisor, Planning Division (Full Orioinal Packet) Linda Pauly. CPR Supervisor, Planning Division Brenda Jones, DSD IOriginal File Copy) Joe Leahy, City Attorney Bob Duey, Finance Department Jerry Smith, Police Department Dave Puent, Building Division Brian Conlon, Public Works Maintenance Tom Boyatt. Transportation Manager, Public Works Transportation Dennis Ernst, City Surveyor AI Gerard, Fire and Life Safety Administration Mary Neuharth, Library Ken Vogeney, City Engineer Brandt Melick, GIS / Program Supervisor Deanna Buckem, Engineering Assistant, Environmental Services Division Connie Scolla. LCOG 99 E, Broadway, Suite 400, Eugene, OR 97401 Jim Henry, 911 Center 1735 W. 2nd Ave" Eugene, OR 97402 Paula Taylor, Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission 99 East Broadway, Suite 400, Eugene, OR 97401-3111 (acknowledgement Itr only) Annette Newingham" Lane County Elections (full packet) 135 E, 6th Avenue, Eugene, OR 97401 Pauly Limbird Hopkins Hopkins Hopkins Pauly Hopkins Limbird Limbird Donovan LRP2007-00095 LRP2006-00030 LRP2007 -00018 LRP2006-00007 LRP2006-00007 LRP2007 -00003 LRP2007-00017 LRP2006-00025 LRP2007-00016 LRP2006-00020 " Mike Bloom, Oregon State Police 3620 Gateway Street, Springfield, OR 97477 ,. Ray Maduna, Springfield Utility Board ~, =-=POBox 300, Springfield:OR:;:97A77 ,;.-:t-'... ' I ~ L,' "'I,' ,', - L .;.'0 ....::.'"~..it!3' I Tim Hanley, Rainbow Water District P,O, Box 8, Springfield, OR 97477 Greg Hyde, Willamalane Parks and Recreation 200 S, Mill Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Marlene Metcalfe, Springfield Utility Board 202 So, 18th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Debbie Williams Lane County Tax Assess,ors, 125 East 8th Avenue; Eugene, OR 97401 541-682-3736 Qwest 1801 California SI., Suite 2500, Denver, CO 80202 Steve Barrett, Springfield School District 525 Mill Street, Springfield, OR 97477 NW Natural; Account Services, Attn: Annexation Coordinator 220 NW, 2nd, Portland, OR 97209 Com Cast Cable, Attention: Tom Henerty 2897 Chad Drive, Eugene, OR 97408 Annette Cardoza, Sanipac P,O, Box 10928, EUgene, OR 97440 jones/annexation/distlisU3-200B -. ", ,~- . "I Office of the Secretary of Stale BILL BRADBURY S__<:..., of Stale ArChives Division MARY BETH HERKERT Director BOO Sommer Sl NE Salem, Oregon 97310 (503) 373-0701 Facsimile (503) 373-{)953 September 7, 2007 Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission Paula L Taylor ' 99 East Broadway, Suite 400 Eugene OR 97401-3111 Dear Ms, Taylor: Please be advised that we have received and filed the following Armexation(s): Ordinance Number Our File Number Date EC FL 07-40 (Florence) EC SP 07-35 (Springfield) EC JC 07-25 (Junction City) C ED 06-69 (Eugene) AN 2007-0292 AN 2007-0293 AN 2007-0294 AN 2007-0295 9/06/2007 9/06/2007 9/06/2007 9/06/2007 Please verify the effective date(s) for these armexatioits through the application of ORS 199.519 . Our assigned file number(s) are included With the above information, - Sincerely, df~.R- B~~ Linda Bjornstad . Official Public Documents cc: Lane County Clerk ODOT /Highway Division PRC/Population Research Center Revenue Cartography Section WWW Server - http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us . Internet E-mail .~reference.archives@State.or.us Oregon Genealogy Listserv - or-roots@archive14~sos;state.or.us " -oregoll LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVl:.nNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION 99 East Broadway Suite 400 ' Eugene, OR 97401,3111 (541) 682,4425 FAX (541) 682-2635 Ju]y ]8, 2007 TO: Boundary Commission Members; Lane County, Commissioners; Lane County Land Management Division; Lane County Environmenta] Health Division; City of Springfield; Willamalane Park and Recreation District; Rainbow Water and Fire District District; John Nepute; and Tom Poage at Poage Engineering & Surveying, mc, FROM: Paula L. Tay]or, Executive Officer SUBJECT: EC SP 07 - 35 (Expedited Procedure) ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD (Nepute) Enclosed is a copy of the staff analysis for this proposal. It is sent to you as required by ORS 199.466. Please read the analysis carefully, The proposal is recomri1ended for aDDfoval without a Dub]ic hearine or further staff study. There are two alternatives: ] , If you agree with this reco!llIflendation, you need do nothing, 2, If you feel that a public hearing is needed, you must request, in writing by July 30, 2007, that a hearing should be set. The request must be in the commission's office by 5:00p.m,; Julv 30th You must use the form that is provided at the end of the staff analysis to request a hearing, For units of government, the form should be signed by the chairman/mayor or other authorized peTson, If you OT your unit of government requests a public hearing, the boundary commission asks that you attend the requested public hearing. If a hearing is requested, it will be set for the next avai]abie boundary commission 'public hearing, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSAL OR PROCEDURE, PLEASE CONTACT OUR OFFICE (54 I -682-4425). Attachments pIc LCBC: LIBClEXPlMEM0\2007\ECSP0735 MEM,DOC Insl Saved: July J 8, 2007 EXPEDITED PROCEDURE - ST AFFANALYSIS LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION Annexation <)f Territory tojhe City of Sorin<!fie]d (N.e.oute) 1. BC File EC SP07 - 35 Initiated by Reso]ution No, 07-26 by the City of Springfield with property owner/elector consent Action under.ORS 199.466 and ]99,490(2)(a)(B) of the boundary commission law Received Ju]y 3, 2007 Pub]ic hearing requests by Ju]y 30, 2007 DescriDtion The annexation area includes. one full tax lot located in western Springfield, north of and adjacent to Kellogg Road, south of Centennial Road, and west of Kelly Butte Property owner: John Nepute (1491 Wirnbledon Place, Springfield) Tax 101:800, T17S R03W S34 Map 22 , Acres: :t 1.02 Estimate of existing population: ] (one,sing]e family residence) Existing land use: Residential Existing zoning in Lane County: LDRlUF-lO, low-density residential with urbanizing ~~~~ , Applicab]e comprehensive plan: Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area GeneralP]an (acknowledged in August 1982 and has been subsequently amended) Existing public services to the l'wl'<-uies: Police (Oregon State Police, Lane County Sheriff\ schools (Springfie]d Schoo] District 19), roads (Lane County, City of Springfield), fire (Rainbow Water and Fire District contracting with the City of Springfield), water (Rainbow Water and Fire District), parks (WiIlamalane Park and Recreation District) Rea~(m fl)rAnnexation The property owner submitted, an application to the City of Springfield requesting annexation to pr~pare this lot for residential development. The Eugene-Springfield Mell'opo]itan Area General Plan requires properties to annex in order to receive urban servIces, This annexation proposal was filed with the boundary commission on Ju]y 3, 2007, in accordance with ORS ]99.490(2)(a)IB), initiated by the City of Springfield with the consent from the property owner/elector. Prior to initiating the annexation, the City of Springfield' received written consent to the annexation from the property owner (John Nepute) arid a, majority of the eligible electors, At the time the annexation was initiated by the city council, there one elector , registered within the annexation area and a written consent was received from the elector (John Nepute), The statutory provision to receive consent from owners of more than one-half the land LCLGBC Staff Analysis (Ee SP01- 35) - Ju]y 18,2007 Page] of9 area and a majority of the electors tORS 199.490(2)(a)(B)] is met. The applicant requested that the provisions of ORS 199.466 (expedited procedure) be used in processing this annexation request. ORS 199.466 authorizes approval of annexations without a public hearing or adoption of a final order if requested by the principal petitioner. Under the expedited procedure, the boundary commission executive officer must prepare an analysis of the proposal within 15 days from its receipt. If, after 25 d'ays from the filing date (in this case, July 30'\ no written objections are received from direct recipients of this staff analysis, the request is approved. However, if any direct recipient of this staff analysis does object, the proposal is scheduled for the next regular boundary commission public hearing, The direct recipients' of this staff analysis are the individuals eligible to request a public hearing and are listed' below under the first boundary commission standard, The proposed annexation includes one full tax lot (refer to Maps No. I and 2), The tax lot in the annexation area iscurreptly developed with one residential unit. The annexation was initiated by the City of Springfield after receiving the necessary consents, .' ' The annexation area is contiguous to the City of Springfield and is in an area that is totally surrounded by the city limits, It is located within the urban growth boundary (UGB) of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan), The Metro Plan designates the tax lotted properties in the annexation area as low-density residential. 'The,tax lot is zoned LDRlUFclO, low"density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay, in Lane County, Upon the effective date of the annexation, the UF overlay will lapse and the properties will be zoned LDR in Springfield, Resolution No, 07-26, unanimously approved by ihe Springfield city council on June 4, 2007, indicates that it had been demonstrated that the properties could be provided with key urban services and the city requested approval of the annexation by the boundary commission. Following is a brief analysis of each of the boundary commission standards, Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions, Consider: the effects of the boundary change on l?ther units' of governments. ORS 199.410(l)(b) and 199.410(3)(c) This annexation request was filed in accordance with provisions in ORS 199 and was determined to be a valid filing in accordance with OAR 191"006 (adopted administrative rule ,on boundary con'unission filing requirements), The petitioner requested the proposal be processed using the expedited procedure, This staff analysis was sent to the ,following direct recIpIents: Lane County boundary commission members; Lane County commissioners; Lane County Land Management Division; Lane County Environmental Health Division; Wil!arnalane Park and Recreation District; City of LCLGBC Staff Analysis IEC SP 07 - 35) -July 18, 2007 Page 2 of 9 , Springfield; Rainbow Water and Fire District; John Neptune; and Tom Poage of Poage Engineering & Surveying, Inc, The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire Di~trict, which provides water service' to properties within its boundaries, After annexation to the City of Springfield, the annexation will be withdrawn from the district by the city in accordance with ORS 222, ,.The Springfield Utility Board (SUB) is the water provider for the City of Springfield and will be the water provider after annexation to the City occurs, The Rainbow Water and Fire District contracts with the,City of Springfield 'for fire, services to properties within its boundaries, If the annexation is, approved, the annexation area will be withdrawn from the district through separate proceeding~ by the City of Springfield in accordance ,with ORS 222, The City of Springfield will provide fire services directly to the annexed area, The annexation area is within the Willarnalane Park and Recreation District and will remain in the district after the annexation is approved since the city is a part 'of this special district. The park district provides park and recreation services and facilities to Springfield residents, Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area will be annexed automatically into the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District tORS 199,51O(2)(c)), which was formed to provide the financing for the regional wastewater treatment plant serving wastewater users within the cities of Eugene and Springfield and other users within the urbanizable area, This request is consistent with this boundary commission stand,ard, Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best ,meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long- range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199A10(3)(a) and (e) The area in this annexation proposal is located within the acknowledged UGB of the Metro Plan, Territory within this portion of the UGB ultimately will be within the City of Springfield, The proposed aimexation is contiguous to the City of Springfield and is in an area totally surrounded by the city limits, Annexation of territory to, the city fulfills,the policies adopted in the Metro, Plan of annexing out to the urban growth boundary, The incremental process of annexation causes short-term boundaries to be established, The acknowledged comprehensive plan in this area identifies the City of Springfield as the unit of government which will provide urban services to this urbanizable area within the UGB. In the long term, territory within this geographic area will be annexed to Springfield, LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP 07 - 35) - July 18, 2007 Page 3 of 9 This annexation is consistent with boundary comnnsslon administrative rule implementing policies (I), (2), (5), and (7) which recognize annexation to an existing city as the preferred method of servicing urbanizable land, (I) This policy recognizes cities as the logical provi'ders of urban levels of service within urban growth boundaries when it is tonsistent with the, comprehensive plan, , (2) This policy expresses the commission's preference for providing urban services through annexation to a city in order to provide urban services to urbanizable lands, ~' (5) This policy encourages provision of urban levels of service within urban growth boundaries, (7), This policy expresses the cominission's preference'for annexation to an existing city over all other alternatives as a means of extending services to urbanizable lands, Implementing policy (3) recognizes that in order to meet the long-term objectives' of annexing out to an acknowledged urban growth boundary, short-term boundaries are created, which are, logical within the context of the future service boundary, Approval of this annexation will eliminate the size of an existing islanded area, This proposal to annex territory to the City of Springfield IS consistent with boundary commission policies and this standard, Make boundary commission detenninations which are consistent with acknowledged local ' comprehensive plans, Assure an adequate quality mid quantity of public services 'required in the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future growth. For major boundary, changes, , there must be assurance that the proposed unit of government is jinanciallyviable. ORS 199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b) and (d) The p.vpvsal area is within the Metro Plan lJGB, The Metro Plan was ackno,wledged by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) in August 1982 and has, been subsequently amended, The Metro 'Plan recognizes annexation as the highest priority' for extending the minimum range of urban facilities and services to urbanizable' areas (policies #8 and #10, page II-C-5) and recognizes that ultimately, all territory within the UGB will be annexed to an existing city (policy #16, page II-C-6), The annexation area is designated low-density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay in the Metro Plan, If the annexation is approved, the an'nexation 'area will be automatically rezoned to city WR, low-density residential, upon the annexation effective date, ' The following services are either, available or can be extended to this annexation area, LCLGBC Staff Analysis lEe SP 07 - 35) - July 18, 2007 Page 4 of 9 , Water - The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Fire District. After annexation to the city, the area will be withdrawn from the district through separate proceedings by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222 and SUB will be the water provider to the annexation area.' An orderly transition of water service will be made consistent with Oregon law and an existing intergovernmental agreement between the two utility providers. Springfield ,staff indicates there is an existing 8-inch main line adjacent to the annexation area in Kellogg Road that can provide service to new development within the annexation area, Electricitv - Springfield staff indicates that electrical service is available from Sl.JB-the utility provider for territory within the City of Springfield, Police services - The Springfield police department can 'provide police protection to the area after annexation without jeopardizing service in other parts of the city, Police protection and response to priority calls can be provided to the annexat,ion area consistent with service protection throughout the city, Fire and emerl'encv services - The annexation area is provided fire and related services by the Rainbow Water and Fire District. The district contracts with the City of Springfield for fire services within its boundaries, After annexation to the city, the area will be'withdniwn from the district by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222, Fire services will be provided directly by the city after annexation, Springfield staff indicated that response time to the annexation area is within the 4-minute response time standard for basic life support services, There is an existing fire hydrant located on Kellogg Road neat the intersection of Oak Meadows Place, Emergency medical transport (ambulance) services are provided on a regional basis by Eugene, Springfield, and Lane Rural FirelRescue to central Lane County, The annexation area will continue to receive this service consistent with the adopted ambulance service area (ASA) plan, Mutual aid agreements have been adopted by the three regional ASA providers to provide backup coverage for each other's jurisdictions, Parks and recreation _ The annexation area is within, the Willamalane Park and Recreation District and will remain in the district after annexation to the city, The City of Springfield is part of the park district and city residents receive park and recreation ,services from the district. Springfield staff indicated that the district operates two aquatic centers, a community center, an adult activity center, and 3 I parks containing a variety of ou!door recreational amenities, The closest parks to the annexation area are Menlo Park and Eastg'!te Woodlands Park, Parks system development charges will be issued for new residential development occurring within the amiexation area, Schools - The area of this request is within the Springfield School District 19,' Springfield staff indicated that existing schools serving this neighborhood--.centennial elementary, Hamlin middle, and Springfield high-will continue to sei-ve the annexation area, LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP 07 - 35) - July 18, 2007 Page 5 of 9 Wastewater - The existing residence is not currently connected to the city wastewater system, Springfield staff indicates that two wastewater serVice lines are extended to the annexation area from the existing 8-inch main in Kellogg Road., Stormwater - Any future development or redevelopment of the annexation area will require appwp,;ate stormwater management techniques in accordance with city standards, ;>treets - The annexation area is adjacent to Kellogg Road, a county road that is already inside the , Springfield city limits, The City of Springfield is recommending acquisition of right-of-way along .the annexation area's southerly boundary, Specifically, the right-of:way line along the southern portion of the annexation area should be extended to coincide with the rightcofcway on the adjacent parcel to the east This acquisition can be acquired when the annexation area is partitioned or further developed, At that time, curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements will be required, Solid waste mana!!ement - Private firms and individuals collect and transport solid waste to the Lane County administered landfill. Communication 'facilities ~ Various providers offer both wire and wireless communication services in the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area, , Existing providers and those entering the market will soon have the capability to provide service to future development in this area. Land use controls - The property is within Springfield's portion of the UGB. Through an intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and the City of Springfield, the city already lias planning and building jurisdiction for this property, The city will continue to administerland use controls after annexation, The minimum level of key urban, facilities and services are either immediately available or can be provided within a reasonable future time frame as needed, This request is consistent with'this standard. Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociologicql trends and projections and its environmen.tal policies, pertinent to the proposal. ORS 199.410(3)(d) and 199.462(1) The annexation proposal is consistent with ,the Metro Plan, as it is an incremental,' step in implementing the long"range plan fof this area, The urban growth boundary, land uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were, developed to meet the future needs of the' metropolitan community, The proposed residential use is consistent with the long,range plans for the area, This request is consistent with this boundary' commission standard, LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP 07 - 35) - July 18, 2007 Page 6 of 9 '\ Recommendation The boundary commission' staff recoinmerids -that the pf(jpo~ed annexation to the city of Springfield (EC SP 07 ~ 35) be approved without the hearing and staff report as required by ORS 199,466, . I . , ~ If a public hearing'is requested, the proposal will be heard 'at the commission's next available', public hearing, If none is requested, it will be approved and effective July 30, 2007 (ORS 199.466 and ORS 199,519), ' , " ### , , Sign and return this form to the boundary commission office, ONLY if you desire that a public hearing be held, Office: 99.East Broadway, Suite 400, Eugene, Oregon 97401,3111 , , " , Pursuant to ORS 199.466, I REQUEST THAT A 'PUBLIC HEARING:'ahd STAFF .. . "" .. ~ '. J. STUDY be conducted on an anhexation" of territory to the City of Springfield (EC SP 07 ..: 35) as . ' required by ORS 199.461. This fonnmust be filed in the commission office no later than 5:00' . t, , p,m" Julv30, 2007, , ' , Reason fonequesting public hearing: ~, c:' .' Date 'Signature~ , Title, Representing Note: If you or your agency requests a public hearing, the ~6mmi'ssion asks that you attend the' requested hearing, ,.- pI LCBCLCOG: LIBc\EXP\2007lECSP0735 SNDOC Last Saved: July 18.2007 LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP 07 - 35) - July 18, 2007 Page 7 of9 L LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP 07 - 35) - July 18, 2007 Page 8 of 9 MAP No.2 SITE MAP Annexation 10 Springfield (Nepute) EC SP 07 - 35 , i " ~ SEE wJ; 17 03 2.7 33 -~_ _u~___ _ ______~_ NAI - '--.- -..- -''-'''_n P,,"CCl"rr ~l.A/j[ eo.l,"_.~ ,...~... '~_I' ~ ANNEXA nON AREA Includes TL 800, 17-03-34-22; Owned by John Nepute (Ee SP 07 - 35) ~ , ... ..,.tlt - l100~ , " , 51 l ~, , -. .' '" \ ., '14 Oi. .. ~.> -~., ~ 51 ", ~-'->>:~"" I KtlL ~"---:'j, -" ....~... 2 '" ~l~ d I ' , I, ., " C ~3 . 2HI 5 ~ 215 , ~ In 5 l! ~, ;..'" r,J #'';~''~ ... (c.. ::'3 _J__ G L ~ --. -Ro :'.~. " .1' 'j. --;~~ ,.3500 : i JBoo ~ "00 S~516l ~~- , ~ .~ 4700 -'::!~ -u.t.-. ~~ Z r H.AM'LTO~ 1"7.: f-tf".. ~ . , ~(o ~500 4400 4300 ! ~ r ~I~EfT f"=::::''''- ~...-; ~~~ . : ~lj1~."-~J2~;. \~~","....J~1.i_-,( , '"" . .". ~ 229 . <:I, .. 3e' t .. 225 ~; ".$:f. r~o;e:~; " -.:' 2'.o.c ! "~~S-T"C'~R-~ - .~-~ ~-~, j I i = ~~- . 0 ~n.c "'" r .,) ~-'-"-~129 . H. 31 ,;A;;__~~_T ) ". :~"-_:'..n:Q'.~~~:;F;'--':"::-'~":' ~ ,,~200.1":l 2000 11100 f 31 "-.;., '.., 3< ~ _~~ Hee' ~, '" ;:! 17 :~'::-<~ .: 'l1;i ; " 1800 ,1700 < 1600 I ~ r ,. -I ~2.4CO I !I~! ' j = i.-ll TAX LOn:ro ON '. N a: -...... ~ u :~.:_I .,l:,~ ~~ >!~~~ ,," j l,-.-~n_~~f"T__m___~=::;~.... t';::..- ;'!~J':;~~~" Un'-D.i ---~-r1 11___"'" ':_~O'-'H'1;~-" ... . ! I . I " '-__~__________J 17 1 2600 " . ~. ~-=-.:~ :'-. , . '11. ~.Ji ~........~. ~ ....-....., , ~1~+.tl ~.. --:::I.'.,. 5000 <900 ,913 ~\~-- ;1 ~.,,,.::~ 'i -- '" I l> -i; 3000 ;j " '-:-," '~';;;'l.' 910 . lJ' : I, ,"",' 'I ' ~ '" . -;;;2.700 , "'':.:,. ...... ~ ~. LCLGBC Staff Analysis (Ee SP 07,,35) - July 18, 2007 Page 9 of9 '., . RESOLUTION NO. 07-26 A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE elTY OF SPRINGFIELD AND REQUESTING THAT THE LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOlJNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE THE ANNEXA TIONBY EXPEDITED I'ROeESS. . . . WHEREAS, the eity receiv~d an application to annex' 1.03 acres into the eity of Springfield .on April 19, 20.0.7; said territory being described as follows: . Township 17 South, Range 36 West, Section 34, Map 22, Tax Lot 800 and more particularly described in Exhibit A of this Resolution, ' WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed IS within the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth Boundary, and is adjacent to the City Limits; imd , WHEREAS, the eity Council i's authorized by ORS' 199.49D(2)(a)(B) to Imttate annexation upon receiving consent in writing 'from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be annexed and written consent from owners of more than half the land in the territory proposed to be . " .,' . . annexed; and, WHEREAS, the property owners of the certain territory described in Exhibit A signed a,consent to annex (Exhibit B); and, WHEREAs, one registered voter resides within the territory aIld.has signed a consent to annex (Exhibit B); and, , WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield Development eode 6,D3D(2)(a) and ORS 222,111 and other applicable Oregon Revised Statutes to initia~e annexation when the territory in the annexation proposal can be provided with the minimum level of: key urban facilities and services in an orderly and efficient manner as defined in Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan Policy 8, page II- B-4; and where there will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services and facilities; and '. WHEREAS, minimum levelkey urban facilities and services are defined in the Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan. page V -3 as wastewater service; storm water ~ervice, solid waste management, water service, fire and emergency medical services, police protection, city-wide parks and 'recreation programs, . electric service, land use controls, communications facilities and services, and public schools on a district- wide basis; and WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed can be immediately provided with a minimum level of key urban facilities as described in Attachment 2; and WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forward this resolution supporting the applica'lt's request for expedited processing to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission; and WHEREAS, the City supports the applicant's request for expedited Boundary Commission processing. w-. .(.4 ~; NOW TIIEREFORE BASED ON TIIE FOREGOING RECITALS, TIIE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section I: The Comrron Council of the City of Springfield does hereby recommend approval of the annexation of the subject territories to the City by the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission, Lane County, Oregon, said territories being described as follows: Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 34, Map 22, Tax Lot 800, and, more particularly described in Exhibit A of this Resolution. , . Section 2:. This resolution shall take effect upon' adoption by the Common eouncil of the eity of Springfield and approval by.the Mayor. . 'Section 3: The City Council recommends .that the Boundary Commission approve the proposed annexation authorized by ORS 199.466 by expedited process without the study, public hearing and adoption of final order required by ORS 199,461. . , Section 4: The City Manager shall forWard this resolution supporting the applicant's reque~tfor.expedited processing to the -Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission, . . ADOPTED by the Common Council of the eity of Springfield this ~Ih day of June, 2007 by a vote of ~b~~q~ ' . Councillresident. Ih . APPROVED by the-Mayor 0 the City of Springfield this ~ day of June, 2007. rJk~ ~O~ Council President ---- . ATIEST: ,'~.J~.' City Recorder U . j.. !' ,",,.. -_:. f"', '. ~' \ " ~ c,...~..... ' J . \....\"-Aw..,. '''?I"2. '1 I C:i"'l..'--:__ '.. .-.' EXHIBIT A-1 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Beginning at a point on the east boundary of Oak Breeze Estates as platted and recorded on file 75, slides 617 and 618 of the Lane County Oregon plat files, in Lane County Oregon, said point being the southwest comer of lot 13, Oak Tree Subdivision as platted and recorded on file 73, slides 781 and 782, of the Lane County Oregon plat files, in Lane County, Oregon; Thence along the southwesterly boundary of said Oak Tree Subdivision, south 89 degrees 57' 45.0" East 173: 17 feet to an angle point in the said southwesterly boundary; thence continuing along said southwesterly boundary, and its north margin of county road No. 307 (Kellogg Street), said point being 20,00 feet from, when measured a1 right angles to, the centerline of Kellogg Street; Thence along said north margin, north 79 degrees 04' 20" west 167.88 feet to a point on the east boundary of said Oak Breeze Estates; thence leaving said north margin, along the'east boundary of said Oak Breeze Estates, north 01 degree 16' 39" east 2436.57 feet 10 the point of beginning, all in Lane County, Oregon. . ., . ..-.....'a.. \", " mg~03 . Site 81.4 \ ;T'..:g-"'&.- -'-- . - :4 7".""-' ., I I. il' 'i t II r I I: ".~. " li ;p :1 "-"" I ., 835 " .t~--tb--,:---~'~' J - L' .t. '836 L -.'- H ,J' . OG 'ij--..----' 'i lot' 'J::' ='...... --R04~',' " "=';:;::." '.'-';lfCO~~:"~~,~, ~' . ,905 '. '200 ".. '-N.O,...... .:.......'.. ..~'... \ .1\' . '"'.. . NO,.~..,._.] '-; _ 3400 ". ~ 07~ .,. (W , T ~. -ae+ """ ~ as ~~; i ~_"'",,'r ,3500"": , 44 L~ ~s L"~"4 a..". . ~ ,'''''''' . ~ ~ 3600 -= 3700 3800 f ..907. .t.33oo-:1 ; -'. " _'. ! 1 ; ril~ ~ "- {oIR," U'F1 ((-II '.. ... "'!: f ;~C' ~ ~ CD ,~' ~.... 2 :r. 0, ! J.. ~' 1 ~ il~__~l'J- ~~ He'~' -. . -~, 5000 .~ . " ~;. 3200 ,IJJ ',' 4900 4800 4700 '~'..' . ~.....~ . -0.21 AC. '," IJJ q '''>:.:6'';'- - ~'-I""o' 0: ~ l' .."...~ 908 ' :.. j j ~ ~' . . A; 3;~~' tn ~,_.. ,,& 0\\\\ :~ ~;.. "',h i, ,,~....i] ~.~' ~^ e-.\\\~ II :1 EXHIBIT- E -1 r~' EXHIBIT B CONSENT TO ANNEX . , '. FORM #1 PETITION ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD EXHIBIT B"2 TO: LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION 'We, the undersigned, constitute the owners of at least one-half of the land area of the property described in the attachment marked ~'Exhibit A" AND We desire to be annexed to the City of Springfield, A map is attached marked "Exhibit B," showing the, affected territory and its relationship to the present city limit boundaries. Tbe annexation constitutes a minor boundary change under the Boundary' Commission Act and should therefore be considered by the Boundary Commission and, after study, a Final Order should be entered by the Boundary Commission. . By Date ''1'y{'1 By Date By Date By Date MAP# 17-03-34-22 LOT# 800 ' MAP# LOT# ~t:' " ~ , With the ab~ve sign re, am verifying that 'I have the authority to consent to the annexation on my own behalf or on behalf of my firm, agency or trust. Revised 12/28/00 5