HomeMy WebLinkAboutAIS PLANNER 3/10/2008
Meeting Date:
Meeting Type:
Department:
Staff Contact:
Staff Phone No:
Estimated Time:
March lO, 2008
Special Regular Mtg
Development~e ices
Jim Donovan ~~~ ,
726-3660, 11""
5 Minutes
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
SPRINGFIELD
CITY COUNCIL
ITEM TITLE:
ACTION
REQUESTED:
ISSUE
STATEMENT:
ATTACHMENTS:
DISCUSSION/
FINANCIAL
IMPACT:
RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT WITHDRAWAL EC SP 07-35,
CITY PLANNING JOURNAL NUMBER LRP2007-0001 7 (NEPUTE)
The Council is requested to conduct a public hearing and first reading of the
attached ordinance: AN ODINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY KNOWN AS NEPUTE, LOCATED IN WEST SPRINGFIELD,
NORTH OF KELLOG ROAD AND NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION
WITH POLTAVA STREET AND INVOLVING APPROXIMATELY 1.03 ACRES
IDENTIFIED AS TAX LOT 800, TI 7S R03W S34 MAP 22; HERETOFORE
ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER
DISTRICT,
Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 222,520) require that territory located in the
. Rainbow Water District, which is annexed to the City of Springfield, be withdrawn
from that district to prevent double taxation. ORS requires withdrawal prior to
March 31" of each calendar year. The owner requested annexation in order to
develop the property for urban use, The subject property was annexed to the City of
Springfield effective on July 30,2007,
. Attachment I: Ordinance with Legal Description, Boundary Commission Staff
Report with Maps, City Council Resolution and Notices of Adoption
Legal notice for tonighl's public hearing was published in the Register Guard
newspaper as required by ORS 222.520 and notices were posted in four public
places. A second reading and adoption is scheduled for March 17, 2008,
, ORDINANCE NO.
{Special)
AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL ,PROPERTY KNOWN AS NEPUTE,
LOCATED IN WEST SPRINGFIELD, NORTH OF KELLOG ROAD AND NORTHWEST OF THE
INTERSECTioN WITH POLTAVA STREET AND INVOLVING APPROXIMATELY 1.03 ACRES
IDENTIFIED AS TAX LOT 800, T17S R03W S34 MAP 22; HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, certain real property described below was annexed to the City of Springfield
by order of Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission under Boundary Commission
Number File EC SP 07-35, effective 07/30/07, as recommended. in City Planning File No.
LRP2007-00017 and supported by City 'Council Resolution No, 07- 26 (and further described in
. Exhibit A & B), and
WHEREAS, the property to be withdrawn is located within the boundaries of the Rainbow.
Water District, and '.
WHEREAS, the City of Springfield Common Council held a public hearing and first reading
. in the Springfield City Council Chambers on March 10, 2008, and a secOnd reading and adoption
on March 17, 2008, in accordance with ORS 222.524, for the purpose of hearing any objections to '
the withdrawal of the property from the public service district mentioned and there having been no .
objections raised, " , , ,
NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the
real property described should be in the best interest of the City of Springfield withdrawn from the
Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, insofar as the property is located therein,
Section 2: The Common Council of lI1e City of Springfield does hereby determine that the
following described real property within the boundaries of the:Rainbow Water District is and shall
be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, said property being
described as follows: Township 17South, Range 03west, Section 34 Map 22, Tax Lot 800; as
, more particularly described in Exhibit B of this ordinance, Boundary Commission File Number EC
SP 07-35.
, ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this'17h day of March 2008,
by a vote of for and against. '
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 17'" day of March 2008.
Mayor,
ATTEST:
City Recorder
.; .-
-1 ~ \;r \:.... ~ L IT-'I\ 'r-\..
2..Ti'STc,g'
ATTACHMENT 1 - 1
EXHIBIT A.1
EA1:U.JjIT A
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Beginning at a point on the east boundary of Oak Breeze Estates as platted and recorded on file
75, slides 617 and 618 of the Lane County Oregon plat files, in Lane Coqnty Oregon, said point
being the soutliwest comer of lot 13, Oak Tree Subdivision as platted and recorded on file 73,
slides 78 I and 782, of the Lane County Oregon plat files, in Lane CountY, Oregon; Thence along
the southwesterly boundary of said Oak Tree Subdivision, south 89 degrees 57' 45.0" East
173.J 7 feet to an angle point in the said southwesterly boundary; thence continuing along said
southwesterly boundary, and its north margin of county road No. 307 (Kellogg Street), said point
being 20.00 feet from, when measured at right angles to, the centerline of Kellogg Street;
Thence along said north margin, north 79 degrees 04' 20" west 167.88 feet to a point on the east
boundary of said Oak Breeze Estates; thence leaving said north margin, along the eastboundary
of said Oak Breeze Estates, north 01 degree 16' 39" east 2436.57 feet to the point of beginning,
ail in Lane County, Oregon.
--...... \
;.<J-o-. -..
~ 711.......,
tp ,
I. 'i\ ;
~
~ ~
1 I
.'
~ :l
i Ii
it> ~
...-1', I
-iIl"~_'~ I
. lOG- t-__---=-- '
.. 0 ..... -RD -.
~~-i .4-'
2 ~~, ":~'I COUry _ ....~...'
905 ," 1200~' T'r~D' ~ '..
.. " -rvO'
1I, ,.,~ '.......307<
. ~ :~ J400 ... ~4~~., "'\-..,. (Was
"'- 2 f -ll9+ ".,. =
~'''a-. ", r "_i:>~ . .3500 ~ 44 ".. -~5 "'~41
, 90;"""'-1,' t 33;'1 ; ; 3600 2 3700 , 3800
P ~,: ~ ,~i ; I ~9.'
.:" 'i' ~~, ~_~ _ ~II- -"""--""'-.
\...V ,. 5000 -'~ . ~
· I '4",3200 . ILl. .'~ - ':J
,-'I. ..._ .21 At:.. ~. lJ.J I . .
9. ~ IS ~ - .'"':.";o...~ , . a::. ~ .i ,'.,
.~. "'908 _. ~;I-
~ . ~; 3100 . ,J en ~ .A,. ..,
:.~ .... =l: ~ ~ .... UI
.~
..
, i
, =:
"- t
-- J
\ .
;
. .._.~..... . .1 IS
814 . _ 39 '. '818
"'01"T- .".,
-.'
,i.:.... .
815
" .....,..:"-.+'#._..~l
"/""C. ,,'--
, -1I....,..,..'Iit......t-'-''-
BOO
1.02 N;.
t
;f
,a
,
0]9-03
Site
ATTACHMENT 1 - 2 "
Uregoft
EXIHBIT R - Q
LANE COuNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
99 East ,Broadway
Suite 400
Eugene, OR 97401-3 II]
(541) 682-4425
FAX (541) 682.2635
July 18,2007
TO: Boundary Corrunission Members;, Lane County Comrnissio~ers; Lane County
Land Management Division; Lane County Environmental Health Division; City of
Springfield; Willamalane Park and Recreation District; Rainbow Water and Fire
District District; John Nepute;and Tom Poage at Poage Engineering & Surveying, ,
Inc.
FROM: Paula L. Taylor, Executive Officer
SUBJECT: EC SP07 - 35 (Expedited Procedure)
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRlNGFIEl.D
(Nepute)
Enclosed is a copy of the staff analysis for this proposal. It is sent to you as required by ORS
199.466. Please read the analysis carefully. The proposal is recommended for aUUToval without
a Dublic hearin~ or further staff study. '
There are two alternatives:
1. If you agree with this ."w......endation,yClu need do nothing.
2. If you feel that a public hearing is needed, you must request, in Writing by Jul:>: 30,
2007, that a hearing should be set. The request must be in the corrunission's
office by 5:00 p.m., Julv 30th. Yoli must use the form that is provided at the end
of the staff analysis to request a hearing. ,'For units of government, the form
should be signed by the chairman/mayor or, other authorized person. If you or
your unit of government requests' a public heanng, th~ boundary corrunission asks
that ypu attend the requested public hearing. If a hearing is requested, it will be
set for the next availabie boundary corrunission public hearing.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSAL OR PROCEDURE,
PLEASE CONTACT OUR O.l',t.!l.,;b (541-682-4425). '
Altachments
pI: LCBC: L:VlClEXPlMEMOIlOU7lECSf'(J7]5 MEM,DOC
lAs. Sav.d: July 18. 2007 '
ATTACHMENT 1 - 3
EXH,JBIT B - P2
., '
. EXPEDITED PROCEDURE..., STAFF ANALYSIS
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
,
Annexation of Territotv to the City of S!>rin!!f1eldfNenute)
I. BC File EC SP07 - 35 ,
, Initiated by Resolution No. 07-26 by lheCity of Springfield with p>vp"'~Y owner/elector,
consent
Action under ORS 199.466 and 199.490(2)(a)(B) of the boundary co~ssion law
Received July 3, 2007 '-1"
Public hearing requests.by July 30, 2007,
Descnntion
The annexation ,area includes one fun tax lot located in western 'Springfield, north of and
adjacent to Kellogg Road, south ~f Centennial Road, and west of Kelly Butte
P,roperty owner: John Nepute (1491 WlJlIblaloD Place. SpringfiI:Jd)
Tax lot: 800, TI7S R03W S34 Map 22
Acres: :!: 1.02
Estirilate of existing population: 1 (one single family,residence)
Existing land use: Residential '
Existing zoning in Lane County: lDRIUF- Wi low-density residential with urbanizing
fringe overlay .
Applicable cu...p."hensive plan: Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan
(acknowledged in August 1982 and has been subsequently amended)
Existing public services to the ....~f'....:.ies: Police (Oregon State Police, Lane County
Sheriff), schools (Springfield School District 19), roads (Lane County, City of '
Springfield), fire (Rainbow Water and Fire District contracting with the City of
Springfield), water (Rainbow Water and FIre District), parks (WillamaIarie Park
and Recreation District) . ,
Reason for Annexation
The p'Up""j owner submitted an application to the City of Springfield requesting
annexation to prepare this l.ot for residential development. The Eugene-SpringfieJd
Metropolitan Area General pian requires properties, to annex in order to receive urban
services.
This annexation proposal was filed with the boundary corrunission on July 3; 2007 i in accordance
with, ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B), initiated by the City of Springfield with the consent from the
property owner/elector. Prior to' initiating the annexation', the City .of Springfield received
written consent to the annexation from the p.up""y owner (John Nepute) and a majority of the
eligible electors. At the time the annexation was initiated by the city council, there one elector
. registered within the annexation area and a written consent ytas received from the elector (J.ohn
Nepute). The statutory provision to receive consent from oWners of more than one-half the land
, LCLGBC Staff Analysis (Ee ~ 07 - 3; - July 18, 2007
Page 10f9
ATTACHMENT 1 - 4
EXHIBIT B - P3
area and a majority of the electors [ORS 199A90(2)(a)(B)] is met, The applicant'requested that
the provisions 'of ORS 199.466 (expedited p.vw~.Jre) be used in processing this annexation
request.
ORS 199.466 authorizes approval of annexations without a public hearing or adoption of a [mal
order if requested by the. prineipal petitioner. Under the expedited procedure, the boundary
corrunission executive officer must prepare an analysis of the p,vpvsal within IS days from its
receipt. If, after 25 days from ,the f1ling date (in this case, July 30~. no written, objections are
received from direct recipients of this staff analysis, the request is approved. HOWever, if any
direct recipient of this staff analysis does object, the proposal is scheduled for the next regular
boundary commission public hearing. The direct, recipients of 'this staff analysis, are the
individuals eligible to request a public hearing and are listed below under the fIrst boundary
corrunission standard. .
The proposed annexation includes one full tax lot (refer to Maps No., I and 2). The tax lot in the
annexation area is currently developed with one residential IJnit. The annexation was initiated by
the CitY of Springfield after receiving the necessary ~onsents: .
The annexation area is contiguous to the City of Springfield and is in an area that is totally
surrounded by the city limits. ' Ii is located within the urban growth boundary (UGB) of the
Eugene~Springfield M";'wpviitan Area General Plan (Metre> Plan). The Metro Plan designates
the tax loltedproperties in the annexation area as low-density residential. The tax lot is zoned
,illRiuF-lO. low-density residential with urbimiZingfringeoverlay, in Lane County. Upon the
effective date of the annexation, the UF o~erlay will lap~e apd the pwp",";es will be zoned lDR
in Springfield.
Resolution No. 07-26, unanimously "pp.v..ed by the Springfiel!l city council on June 4, 2007,
indicates that it had been demonstrated that the ~wp'" Je~ could be provided with key urban
services and the city requested "Pl" v..al of the annexation by the boundary corrunission.
Following is a brief analysis of each of the boundary commission standards.
,
Provide an impartial forum for resolution 01 local jurisdictional questions. "Co.nsider the
effects of the boundary change on other units of governments, ORS 199.410(l)(b) and
199.410(3)(c)
This annexation request was filed in accordance with provisions in ORS 199 aiId was determined
to be a valid filing in accordance with OAR ]9]-006 (adopted administrativ'e rule on boundary
commission filing requirements). The petitioner requested.,the y'~pvsal be processed using the
expedited procedure. '
This staff 'analysis was sent to the following direct reCIpIents: Lane County boundary
commission members; Lane County corrunissioners; Lane County Land Management Division;
Lane County Environmental Health Division; WilIamalane ParIc and Recreation District; City of
LCLGBC Staff Analysis ree sp 07 - 35) - July 18, 2007
Page 2 0(9 '
ATTACHMENT 1 - 5
EXHIBITB - P4
Springfield; Rainbow Water and Ere District; John N~tune; and Tom P~age of Poage
Engineering & Surveying, Inc.
The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water and Frre District, which provides water service
to properties within its boundaries. After annexation to the City of Springfield, the annexation
will be withdrawn from the district by the city in accordance with ORS 222. .The Springfield
Utility Board (SUB) is the water provider for the City ,of Springfield and will be the water
provider after annexation to the city occurs. ; ,
The Rainbow Water and Fire District contracts with the City of Springfield for fITe services to
properties within its boundaries. If the anllexation' is <>.pyw..ed, the annexation area will be
withdrawn from the district through 'separateproceedin'gs by the City of Springfield in
accordance with ORS 222. The City of Springfield will provide ftre services directly to the
annexed area.
The annexation area is within the Willamalane Park and Recreation District and will remain in ,
the district after the annexation is approved since the city is a part of this special district. The
park 'district provides park and recreation services and facilities to Springfield residents. '
. 1:
Upon the effective date of the annexation, the area will be annexed automaticaIly into the Lane
County M"uvpvlitan Wastewater Service District [ORS 199.510(2)(c)], which was'formed to
provide the financing fo" the regional wastewater, treatment plant.serving wastewater users within
the cities of Eugene and Springfield and other users within th~ urbanizable area. .
This request is consistent with this boundary corruniSsion slaI1dard.
Consider the orderly determination' and adjustment of lottal government boundaries to best
meet the needs of lAne County, and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where
intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on .the most effective long-
range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a)
and (e)
The area in this annexation proposal is located within the acknowledgedUGB of the Metro Plan.
Territory within this portion of the UGB ultimately will be within the City of Springfield. The
p' vp~sed annexation is contiguous to the City of Springfield and is in an area totally surrounded
by the city limits. Annexation of teIntory to the city fulfills the policies adopted in the Metro
,Plan of annexing outto the urban growth boundary.
The incremental process of annexation causes short-term boundaries to be established. The'
acknowledged comprehensive plan in this area identifies the City of Springfield as the unit of
government which will provide urban services to this urbanizable area within the UGH. In the
long term, territory within this geographic area wlll qe annex~d to Springfield.
LQ.GBC Staff Analysis (EeSP07-3S)-July IS, 2007
Page 3 of9
ATTACHMENT 1 - 6
EXHIBIT B - P5
, This' annexation is 'consistent with boundary w.......ission administrative rule implementing
policies (1), (2), (5),md (7) which recognize annexation to an existing city as the preferred
method of servicing urbanizable land. .
(I) This policy recognizes cities as the logical providers of urban levels of service
within urban growth boundaries when it is consistent with the. wwp...hensivl;
plan. \. .'
('2)" This policy expresses the corrunission's preference for pro:viding urban services
through annexation to a City in order to provide urban services to urbanizabJe
lands.
(5) This policy encourages provision of urban levels of service within'urban growth
boundaries. '
(7) This policy expresses the corrunission' s preference for annexation to an existing
city over all other. alternatives as a means Of extending services to urbanizable
lands. .,
Implementing policy (3) recognizes that in order to meet the long-term objectives of annexing
out to an' a~knowledged urban growth boundary, short-tenp boundaries are created, which are
logical within the context of the future service boundary, Approval of this annexation will
, . eliminate the size of an existing islanded 'area.
This proposal to annex territory to
cornrnissionpolicies aDd this standard.
the CitY of Springfield IS' consistent with boundary
_it
,
Make boundary commission determinations which are consistent with acknowledged local
comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in
the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future growth. For major boundJzty. changes,
there must be assurance that the proposed unit of gov"rnment is finandally viIlble. ORS
199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b) and (d) , ,
The proposal area is within the Metro Plan UGB~ The Nletro Plan was acknowledged by the
Land ,Conservation and Developml;nt Corrunission (LCDC) in August 1982 and has been
, subsequently amended: The Metrd. Plan recognizes annexation as, the highest priority for
extending the minimum range of urban facilities and services to urbanizable areas (policies #8
,and #10, page D-C-5) and recognizes that ultimately, al] territory within the UGB will be
annexed to an existing city (policy #16, page D-C-6). '
The annexation area is designated low-density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay in ,the
Metro Plan. If the annexation is approved, the annexation area will be automaticaIly rezoned to
city LDR, low-density residential, upon the annexation effective date.
The following services are either available or can b~extended to this annexation area
LCLGBC Staff Analysis lEe SP 00- 35) - July 18, 2007
Page40f9,
ATTACHMENT 1 - 7
EXHIBIT B- P6
~I .
Water - The annexation area is within the Rainbow Water aUdFire District. After annexation to
the city, the area will be withdraWn from the district through, separatejll"Olieedings by tlie City of
Springfield in accordance with ORS 222 and SUB will be the water provider to .the annexation
'area An orderly transition of water service will be made consistent with Oregon law and an
'existing intergovernmental a5'""...ent between the two utility providers. Springfield staff
indicates there is an existing 8-inch main line adjacent to tl).e annexation area in Kellogg Road
that can provide service to new development within the annexation area. '
Electricity - Springfield staff indicates that electrical service is available from SUB-the utility
provider for territory within the City.of Springfield. ' ,
Police services :- The Springfield police department can p~ovide police protection' to the area
after annexation without jeopardizing service in other partS of the city. Police' protection and
. "
response to priority calls can be provided to the annex!ltion area consistent with service
protection throughout the city. '
Fire ahd ",..". ~"ncv services. - The annexation area is provided fire and related services by the
Rainbow Water and Fire District. The district contracts, with the City of Springfield for fIre
seivices within its boundaries: After annexation to the city, the area will be withdrawn from the
district by the City of Springfield in accordance with ORS 222. FIre services will be provided
directly by the city after annexation. . Springfield staff indicated that response time to the
annexation area is within the 4-rninute response' tirile standard for basic life support,services.
There is an existing fIre hydrant located on Kellogg Road near the intersection of Oak Meadows
Place. ' ,
Emergency medical transport (ambulance) services are provided on a regi.onal basis by Eugene,
Springfield, and Lane Rural FIre/Rescue to central Lane County. The annexation area will
continue to receive this service consistent with the adopted ambulance service area (ASA) plan.
Mutual aid a&""...ents have been adopted by the three regional ASA providers to provide backup
coverage for each other's jurisdictions. "
Parks and recreation - The annexation area is within the'Willarnalane Park and Recreation
District and will rem;Un in the district after annexation to the 'city. The City of Springfield is part
of the park district and city residents receive park and recreation services from the district.
Springfield staff indicated that the district operates two 'aquatic centers; a community center, an
adult activity center, and 3 I' parks coriiaining a ,variety of optdoor recreational amenities. The
closest parks to the annexation area are Menlo Park and Eastgate Woodlands Park. Parks system
development charges will be issued for new residential development occurring within the
, annexation area.
Schools - The area of this request is within the Springfield School District 19. Springfield staff
indicated that existing schools serving this neighborhood-Centennial elementary, Hamlin
middle, and Springfield,high-will continue to serve the annexation area
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (Ee Sp rn - 35) :.. July 18, 2007
Page50f9' ,
ATTACHMENT 1 - 8
EXHIBIT B - P7
Wastewater - The existing tesidence is not currently corin~cted to the city wastewater system.
Springfield staff indicates that two wastewater service lines are extended to the annexation area
, from the existing S~inch main in Kellogg Road.
Stormwater - Any future development or redevelopment 'Of th:e annexation area will require
..pp.vp.:ate stormwater management techniques in accordance with'city standards. "
"
Streets - The annexation area is adjacent to Kellogg'Road, a county road'that isaIready inside the
Springfield city limits. The CitY of Springfield is recommending acquisition of right-of-way
along the annexation area's southerly boundary. Specifically, the right-of-way line along the
southern portion of the annexation area should be extended to coincide with the rightcof-way on
the adjacent parcel .to the east. This acquisition can be ac'quired when the, annexation area is
piutitioned or further developed. At that time, curb, gulter, and sidewalk improvements will be
required. '
Solid waste inanal!ement - Private ftrms and individuals collect and transport solid waste to the
Lane County administered landf"ill, "
Communication facilities - Various providers offer both' wire and wireless communication
services in the Eugene-Springfield m..uvpvlitan area. Existing providers and those entering the
market will,soon have the capability to provide service to future development in this area.
Land use controls, - ,The property is within Springfield's!portion of the UGH. ,Through an
intergovernmental a& .......ent between Lane County and the,; City of Springfield, the city already
has planning and building jurisdiction for this property. The' city will continue to administer land
use controls after annexation.
The minimum level of key urban facilities and services are either: immediately available or can be
provided within a reasonable, future, time frame as needed. This request is consistent with this
standard.
Consider the comprehensive plan'~ economic, demographic, and sociological trends and
projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposal. ORS 199.410(3)(d) and
199.461(1) "
The annexation proposal is consist6nt with the Metro Plan, as It IS an' incremental step in ,
implementing the long-range plan for'this area. The urban growth boundary, land uses, and
policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the m..uvpvlitan
community. The p.vpv~ed residential use is consistent with !,he long-range plans fpr the area.
This request is consistent with this boundary commission standard.
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (Ee sp IJ7 - 35) - July IS, 2007
Page 6 of 9 '
l.
ATTACHMENT 1 - 9
EXHIBIT B - P8
Recommendation
The boundary wuu....ission' staff recommends that the proposed annexation to the City of
'Springfield (EC SP 07 - 35) be ..pp.v..ed without the hearing and staff report as required by ORS
199.466. ' ' "
If a public hearing is requested, the proposal will be heard at the commission's next available
public hearing. If none is requested, it will be approved and effective July 30, 2007 (ORS
199.466 and ORS 199.519). . .,
###
p.m., Julv 30, 2007.
Reason for requesting public hearing:
, ^,
"
Date
Signature
Title
Representing
Note: If you or your agency requests a public hearing, the corrunission 'asks that you attend the
requested hearing. '
pI LCBC:LCOG: L:V1C>E:XP12OO71ECSP073S S/'{,DOC
Lasl Saved: July J 8. 2007
LCLGBC Staff Analysis,~ 51' rn ~ 35) - July IS, 2007
Page 7 of9
ATTACHMENT 1-10
EXHIBIT B - P9
MAP No.1 VICINITY MAP '
Annexation 10 Springfield (Nepute)
ECSP07-35
L
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP 07 - 35) - July 18, 2007 '
Page 8 of 9
ATTACHMENT 1 - 11
HrloI+~ I T ~ ~
MAP No. 2' , SITEMAl'
Annexation to Springfield (Nepute)
EC SP07 - 35
ANNExATION AREA
Includes 11. BOO, 17.ffi-34-22'
Owned by John Nepute '
(Ee SP 1Y7 - 35)
...J, . .,,,, ' .t ,.~'
.~ "'-911& .
- ....
..,...~
. 1100 iI!lt
'-:4' ...a
I.'!:!:. _.' . .,-.
- ,
.~
l~
. t ~lfiL
--...... _ l
"-. -
.",~..~.."
.J. "'~..'
t .i
SEE ..J 17 OJ rr 33' .
--. ~ il
-------
--._--
~~~=z._
- ----..-....
NAI
..,..
tCl-.g&1o
...
lll':!_
--...
\'- ...
(!E:...Ut!
1113 ~,
I,
~
1.
" -, '<
...
rfJ
214
ffi.
ww
~"
.-..
JJCll
-='--'
~_-:I ....
~ ,hJ
'UJ
.0::
31011 A Ii;
... != 3000 J
Jf' ,~ ~
'- -t. .... '
.,'0" ~
!l' -J
'" :naxi" 1 ~
,,,
"""',
. ~ i 3llOD j
....
!
"-
7:::"~-.:r7tlO
I '-.,. __~.
- I
, -....,
"~ DlJO" . .......:m D '
Z2DO I. 2000
n.,_' II/l " 1
Il" I' I
""" H'
:'~'}'~"~l.l ~~- ~~I~~ ~
r irn-iH
l20
, 1 l
. ___-=..... . ...1...
17
-
.. - ~ ...
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (Ee sp en - 35) - July IS, 2007
Page 9 of 9
ATTACHMENT 1 - 12,
-~:
EXHIBIT B - P11
.1
RESOLUTION NO. 07-26
A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD AND REQUESTING THAT THE LANE' COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
BOUNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE THE ANNEXATION BY l:l.i\.n.ulTED PROCESS.
, :1
WHEREAS, the City received an application to annex 1.03 acres into the City of Springfield on April 19,
2007, said territory being described as follows:, :, ' '
Township 17 South, Range 3 6 West, Section 34, Map 22, Tax Lot 800 and more particularly described in
Exhibit A of this Resolution.' . . "
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed ,is within the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth
Boundary, and is adjacent to the City Limits; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by ORS 199.4~O(2)(a)(B) to initiate annexation upon
receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be
annexed and written consent from owners of more than half the land in the territory proposed to' be
annexed; and, '
WHEREAS, the property owners of the certain territory described in Exhibit A signed a consent to annex
(Exhibit B); and, , '
WHEREAS, one registered voter resides within the territory and has signed a consent to annex (Exhibit
B); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield Development Code 6.030(2)(a) and ORS
222.111 an.d other applicable Oregon Revised Statutes to,initillte annexation when the territory in the
annexation proposal can be provided with the minimum leVel of key urban facilities and services in an
orderly and efficient manner as defmed in Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan Policy 8, page II-
B-4; and where there will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services and facilities;
and '
, WHEREAS, minimum level key urban facilities and services are 'defined in the Eugene-Springfield Metro
Area General Plan. page V-3 as,wastewater service;stonnwaterservice, solid waste management, water
service, fire and emergency medical services, police protection,. city-wide parks and .~_,,,,,';on programs,
electric service, land use controls, cori1):nunicationS facilities and services, and,public schools on a district~
wide basis; and "
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed can be immediately provided with a minimum level of
key urban facilities as described iil Attachment 2; and .
WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to'forwatd this resolution supportiiIg the applicant's request
for expedited processing to the Lane County Local Go'Cernment Boundary Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Sl.ptM.., the applicant's request for expedited Boundary Commission processing.
'ATTACHMENT 1'-13
1\)..
EXHIBIT B - P12
NOW TIIEREFORE BASED ON TIlE FOREGOING RECITALS, TIlE COMMON COUNCIL OF
TIlE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section I: The Common Council of the City of Springfieh! does hereby recommend approval of the
annexation of the subject territories to the City by the Lane County Loc3l Govemment Boundary
Commission, Lane County;Oregon, said territories being described as follows: '
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 34, Map 22, Tax Lot 800, and more particularly
described in Exhibit A of this Resolution.
Section 2: This resolution shall take effect upon' adoption by the Coxmnon Council of the City of
Springfield and approval by the Mayor.
Section :t The City Council recommends that the Bounaary Commission approve the proposed
annexation' authorized by ORS 199.466 by expedited process without the study, public hearing and
adoption of finaI order required by'ORS 199.461.
Section 4: The City Manager, shall forward this resolution supporting the applicant's request for expedited
processing to the Lane County Local Govemment Boundary Commission.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this -..!L th day of June, 2007 by a vote of
---h. for and -0 against. ' " i
, Council President 'ill'
APPROVED by the-Mayorof the City of Springfield this ~ day of June, 2007.
.tl~~
~C~ Council President
--
ATTEST:
, ~J~
City Recorder U '
, . . J', I i' ~. ,... ~:.,...., I i ~ I .;
'(.;- " "
, ~ C>)u.... J \..~-A\'<-\
, " ":>'"h."l. I C>~.___
'J
ATTACHMENT 1 ~14
"
EXHIBIT B - P13
"
EAttwIT A
,
"
'.;
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Beginning at a point on'the east boundary of Oak Breeze Estates as platted and recorded on file
75. slides 617 and 618 of the Lane County Oregon plat files, in Lane County Oregon, said point
being the southwest comer of lot 13, Oak Tree Subdivision as platted and recorded on file 73,
slides 781 and 782, of the, Lane County Oregon plat files, in Lane County, Oregon; Thence along
the southwesterly boundary of said Oak Tree Subdivision, south 89 degrees 57' 45.0" East
173.17 feet to an angle 'point in the said southwesterly' boundary; thence continuing along said
southwesterly boundary, and its north margin of county road No. 307 (Kellogg Street), said point
being 20.00 feet from, when measured at rightangles to, the centerline of Kellogg Street;
, Thence along said north margin, north 79 degrees 04' 20" west 167.88 feet to a point on the east
bouildary of said Oak Breeze Estates; thence leaving said north margin, along the east boundary
of said Oak Breeze.Estates, north 01 degree 16' 39" east 2436.57 feet to the point of beginning,
all in Lane County, Oregon.
~~ \
L if -,;.........
iP I
II 'iI iI
+
~ ~
I I
.
~ :1
i Ii
;" '.,
.' 'r "
~L~~ I
..lOG-i---~ _,'.
;,...;',.;.. .. -Ro'~... '
. 2 ~i"""-::': -:-}", COU"r ~ ",,":- .......,
..-:7 .:~.. .r Y~o "_ '.,
. , i 90S 1ZOO ',--- ' .... No '~"'__'_',
I , '1 ,.~, :.....301
. l; 3400 ~.~ ..,. .,.' (Was
'10 4<3......~.
~. -eat-. ,. . '.....44 "'...._
It--~-c.)'- , .3500 : -45 h.'1I"
..j3 ~ -- :; 3600 ~ 3700 _ J800
b,3J00. . . ' n1 '
':: r7\' I ~j - ,: . j . \U" ]9
05 ~~-_:;(\I- ~~~ ......
IJJ 5000 9
, 1 't3Z00' 400 4l!00 4700
'q'" ~. II ,r.; ''--.O:bl_~.rQ.21 ~ ~ i ~ i -
'1- ." 908 -/ ,"1-' -
~ '.. 1;31-00 ~ l/) .. ~..'~, ~.~
\
'.
"
r ~'-""'IJn - ..
tfll
B1B
\
B14
.. J
I .
l" , . "--'
~lio:.....
81S I~; ~ '817 ~
, , 8,16 1'!' _ ~ ....~
'I ;, ~,..r ~ Jrv
J,;. ~'::::~'~~J '. ,..;,.., '~.~;-' ,,;;- ~'l"s;>
jo;.......,......-l~'t- ..... 833' ~~ . ~ . .
BOO . I' ' I! "" '
1.02 /If:. ~...'; _.... 2J __... "
" 1, .~:.~, ,f ;A~~~;Y l:.~~
,iBJ.4 l' . ~ L
,ii !- :::I2~ .~
., ii' J
.
,
'.
mQ-03
Site'
.;
.
;k
ATTACHMENT 1- 15
EXHIBIT B - P14
EXHIBIT B
CONSENT TO ANNEX
,
"
/,
ATTACHMENT 1 .:.. 16
EXHIBIT B - P15
FORM #1
it
"
PETITION
!i-
: ANNEXA liON TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
,
TO: LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUt'JDARY COMMISSION
We, the undersigned, 'constitute the owners of at least one- haIfof the land area of the property described in the
attachment marked "Exhibit An AND '
'J
I ' ,
We desire to be annexed to the City of Springfield. A map is attached marked "Exhibit B," showing the
affected territory and its relationship to the present city limit boUndaries.
. . a
The annexation constitutes a minor boundary change under th~:Boundary Commission Act and should therefore
be considered by the Boundary Commission and, after study, a Final Order should be en~ed by the Boundary
Commission. " " ,
By ~ Date '~'~'1
By Date
By Date
By Date,
MAP# 17-03-34-22
1OT# SOD '
MAP#
LOT#
With the ab~ve Si~,tveiifying tha\ I have lhe authority to consent
to the annexation on my own behalf or on behalf of my fIrm, agency or trust.
Roviscd 12128100
5
ATTACHMENT 1 -17
-
.
Office of the :~---J of StIle
Bn.L BRADBURY
G_-,"-.J of State
September 7, 2007
Lane County Local
" Government BO):lI\dary Commission
Paula L Taylor
99 East Broadway, SUite 400
Eugene OR 97401~3111
Dear Ms. Taylor:
EXHIBIT B - P16
AzclJivoo DiviaiIl11
MARY BETH HERKERT
Di:rector
800 Sommer St NE
Sa1l!111, Oregon !1T.l1O
(503) 373-G7Ol.
FaaimiIe (503) 3nll953
" '
Please be advised "that we ,have received and filed the following Annexation(s):
Ordinimce Number
"
. . !'
Our File Number
EC FL 07-40 (Florence)
EC SP 07-35 (Springfield)
EC IC 07-25 Ounction City)
C EU 06-69 (Eugene)
AN 2007-0292
AN 2007-0293
AN 2007-0294
AN 2007-0295
Date
9/06/2007
9/06/2007
'9/06/2007
,9/06/2007
I
Please verify the effective date(s) fcir,these annexations through the application of
ORS 199:519 '
, Our assigned file number(s) are included with the above information.
Sincerely,
dI---.J-B~~
Unda Bjoinstad '..
Official Public Docun:lents ".
,
cc:
Lane County Oerk
OOOT /Highway Division
PRC/Popu1ation Research Center
Revenue Cartography Section
WWW Server - http-Jlm:web..sos.state.or.us . Inlemet E-mail -reference._.:I~.._.:....:e.or.us
," " Oregon GerIeal~ Listserv - ar-rootsaan:hivel4.scs.state.or.us
ATTACHMENT 1 - 18 . "
"-
,
EXHIBIT B - P17
JONES Brenda'
-
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc::
Subjec:t:
T A YLORPaula L[PT AYLOR@lcog.,org]
, Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:53 AM ,.' '
. SCOLLA Connie J; SCHULZ Stephanie E; HOPKINS Steve; JONES Brenda
Michael Kaiser .
Annexation (Nepule)
No public hearing was requested on the Nepute annexation, to the City of Springfield (ECSP07-35). 50
the annexationi5 approved and effective July 3D, 2007, attheiend of the day.
. . . . a
If you have arry questions, please let me know.
Paula Taylor, E=utiv. Officer
Lmc County Locd Govcmmcnt Boundaty C......:....:."
(541) 6824425 , , ' .
Fu: (54t) 682-2635, '
r
1
ATTACHMENT 1 -19