Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 8/19/2008 ,'" ,0 , , City of Springfield '" Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield,OR97477 Site Plan Review , PRE.SUBM1lTAL REC'O AUG 192008 .... I, i', AppliCatioJl Type ('Applicant: check one) Site Plan Review Pre-Submittal: gj Site Plan Review Submittal: D .. . Major Site Plan Modification Pre-Submittal: Ma"or Site Plan Modification Submittal: . \:', , I APplicantName:~,:. .r:.4f2.l-1:\ H-~()/l...t::"J.J Phone: 72c;.. -ZlDlI;;~ Icompany: CI'lU.O~~I.... r.f.Iotc.&: H.e.hlrt:f>'!>6(2.{ Fax: IAddress: jc)4 'Z ~ l?r("{ 61: " ,0 , IAPPlicant's ReD.: C A..I2..L.A H" 0 I L-uJ,J I . . Company: IAddress: , I Property Owner: L U"'.A~ i CAr2.L..A HCl.C)ull.,,';N , I Company: i I Address: , IASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-o'3-ZG....'Z.~ ITAX LOT NOeS): ~1'Jo6 I Property Add~ess: I~ 4 'Z j:;?rH ~T " ISize of Property: '1.~ c:;;, Ae i2 E-~ ,lProposed Name of Project: ("~~{L.012..E-""~ Gl-l.O(C'~ M.oNTE~~~1 " I Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your pn;>posal description to this application, Prooosal: ,i I Existinq Use: 0A'r CAI2.E ": INew Impervious'~Surface Coveraqe (Includinq Bldq. Gross'Floor Area): '''-I6N.fZ. sf Si natures: ~Please si nand rint our name and date in the, a riate box on the next Phone: 72(.,,- 2~ 54 , Fax: I <:. I , Phone: iZ(".- Z~~4 Fax: ,', i I , ,0 'Acres ~ Square Feet rJ , , - ~ Associated Aoolications: I Pre-Sub Cas~ No.: fro/Jor /f'J6 rfl Icase No.: IAPPlication Fee: $ ITOTAL FEES: Date: q Iltt/ak v I . Siqns: Reviewed 'bY: ~ ' tM ~~ I , Reviewed by: I I Postage Fee: $' <" Date: ITechnical Fee: $ PROJECT NUMBER: R,:vised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 1 of 10 J , Owner Signatures . ., t. " .~ . : .. ~ I ". , This application form is used for both the required pre-submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signature~s are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. , Pre-Submittal ~ ..:-~ . '...> The undersigned aCknowledges that the information in this application. is correct and accurate for scheduling of the -7k';r ~ .... ,_ '..., , a _, . \_ Slgnature\"l ',.~.', '..,,\ .: n In He Qr;?1f~~~j",j ~ - ------.. ,\.,... ;'.':'.., ~o!~ Print . 1<:'::' ,,'- -_, Date: ?(' - R-o ~ ~. \ '-~, _'. ~ 1.} ;'-,' ...,. ~ .' ''''I_~''''''~''''....._l ,;..., o! ...~_. ....1.... Owner: : ~ ~~~~:,,:J J ;.....j.;j. :.J. ..:",' ;.~ ~il'.s.i,,~)~~-:l:. '...-, .... ':;,., ~"}! ~~. ~~ "- \ .f... . Submitt'al:.- .~~ . ~;~;'.:, \ } A. '" J"~ ! '/..) .\ -~! .-.;-. ,-'...:J .':..\~ ....J I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre-Submittai Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing" the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin prOcessing the application with the information as "."- .;:.~ su,,"brJlitt~.. ~!s s.tatement serves,.a~ V!ritte,n.no~i_~ pu~uaRt t?S~elequ~r~rven~~,o~ O~Slf27:178 pertaining to a owne,; ro~(;;;/~:. , ,.....~.~,'~:~'~o (( L]~ , ~ - ~ - Signature . ar0"~::'N~ /:lUI{ (off ~:';\:.~~'~." C;';-'..';': ~" . ('-" '.. .. ...,...jI .~.. '\ ,'" Print ) ,;-' ;..,,'"'~ ,.~ ,~.~ le~ " " "~:'.'.:'~., ,.,":-,'; ....; '"~''' ;;;"":'; ~ ." t .... ~ . \ ._":.! .~):~ ....7.~ ..~:fJ" >i _.... ,. -.: ..~ .:") ':;"':~.;' .'.. .<':' ~~!. ,,,-;: .1f"', c;.' ....1.....1..._. ., _ ,"." ....J ~ . ~.", .~ ..~.:,.: -', .- -" - j -.4,...... ~ ;:. . ~~ ,j. ~ ,). ~...'" I.. I ' Revised 1/1/08 Moliy Markarian , 2 of 10 Site Plan Review Application Process j: 1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application fo'r Pre-Submittal o 'The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. :, o A pre-submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre-submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday;, from 10:00 am - noon. o Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre-submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. if 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre-Submittal M~eting . II o The applicant; owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre- submittal meeting. ' ' ~ . o The meeting is held with representatives from Publ,ic Works Engineering and Transportati,on, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. ' ' o The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre-Submittal Checklist specifying the items'''' required to mak!! the flPplication complete if it is n9t already complete, ar)d the applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision ' ; o ' A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. ' o AType II decision, made C!fter public notice, but, without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. o Mailed notice is provided to property owners and o,ccupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one, sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. !I . There is a 14-day public comment period; starting 'on the date notice is mailed. , o Applications are distributed to the Deyelopment Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well 'as ~ny written comments from those given notice. '. '. Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied; , o At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide'a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. o The City mails the applicant and any party of stan~ing a copy of the decisi6n, which is' ' , effective on the day it is mailed. o The decision issued is the final decision of the City ,but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. I: PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O AUG 1.92008 " ., I Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 3 of 10 Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: ~ . ALL ,of the following items MUST ,be submitted for BOTH Pre-Submittal and Submittal. ~ ~ . If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please IS1 tJ state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ~D ;z: ~:r- ~-.( <;.Jl.\ "" [~L u;! 0 r.,.) \( ~ "~\ )- -,~ ~ .( ,D~ ~ - III 0 ~ 0 J: /0 Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. Any applicable application, technology, and posta,ge f~es are collected at the pre-submittal and submittal stages. p~6~01 E/f?qC::,.!3P j S0\.:::lYI'~,,-~- Site Plan Review Application Form ' !;?.(CS'i3./LJ Narrati~e'explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. 'Copy of the De,:~ ," Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all'encumbrances. ' Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to.8'h"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. ' Right-of-Way Approach Permit Application provided 'where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Thr:eel3TCopies of the Stormwater Management System Study witli-Comple~e(f ,St6r~o\I!:~[~ScoDihg~Sfl~~fAtt~ched - The pi~n, supporting calculations arid' ao<i,uJ:T1ent"ilBbri'must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manuar.~-~ ' Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in ! ' accordance with SDC 4.2-105 AA. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze: . and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's . transportation system. _ In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. . . -.. "- - ._-- Seven (7)Copies of the Following Plan--Sets'_fo!,,_Pre-~ubmittaIOR Eighteen (18) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for~ Submittal o All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and: sufficientto show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow! and date of preparation. o All plan sets must be folded to 8V2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. a. Site Assessm-ellt of Existing Conditions' /' ,P Prepared by an 0regon licensed Lan~scape Architect or Engineer ov .n, _ , , " heR. J'1 fA Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian q v o C9-fL 40f 10 , PRE-SUBMITIAl REeD / ~icinity Map., ',', , .' :. AUG 1. 92008 ". ~~The name, loca~i~n an~ dimensions of all existing.sit~ fe.atures in~luding ?~ildings, curb cuts, trees and Impervious surface areas, clearly Indicating what IS remaining and what is being removed. For eXisting structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. ~ " 0/0Jhe name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses ,N I' ~nd required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Mapon file in the Development Services Department" ~. ' . . I o The 100-year floodplain and f100dway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted F!=MA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or ,FEMA' approved Letter of -Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revisionb&--Z l>< ~,'}-e ~b"" ~\;;...,,~ p->-ree J( ~~ o The Time of TraveJ Zones, as specified ,in SDC 3;3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead , Protection AreaSMa'p on file in.the Development S~rvices Department ~ 0 Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant c~usters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcrop pings :1 . o Soil types and water table infOrmation as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A G,eotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer f')1ust be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table '90 '- M.0o\'\ - ex'o;>,..... Uv-.d ~k: y G,37o b. Site Plan II q S~: - Uv'\?~ C-~ <Lc:>~Je~)'t/o o Prepared by an Oregon licensed Archites;:t, Landscape Architect,or Engineer _ . r .' ---l 0 Proposed buildings: location, 'dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from propertY lines, and distance b,etween buildings , ' ,.)"l13 S~ F T, ~ 0 Location and height of existing or proposed,(ences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs , . f ' ~ 0 Location, dimensions, and n.umber of typical, com8,act and disabled parking spaces; including aisles" wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping , o Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vetl,icular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces , ~. . . ;UfO Observancetof s,olar access requirements as specifj.~d in the applicable zoning district 1'__ . ;, .' ~ On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation ~?Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be serv~d, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and: curb cuts proposed to be closed :1 ~. Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaceS: ~"Location of existing and proposed transit facilities ,;' ~' Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar ,public and semi-public uses "', " o Phased Development Plan - where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a PJhaSing plan indicating any proposed. phases for de,velopment, including the boundaries IV nd sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street . connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other Revised 11110S'Molly Markarian 5 of 10 required public'improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater , , management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. : c. Improvement and Public Utilities Plan o Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engine~r . - o Location and width of all existing and proposed easements o Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable. . 0 Location and type of existing and proposed stree.~ lighting o Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transform'ers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities o Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, , sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails ~ 0 Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points d. Grading, Paving, & Stormwat~r Management Plan o Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer o Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the storm water management system ----.+ 0 Roof drainage p'atterns and discharge locations --\ 0 Pervious and imper:vJous area drainage patterns o The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and naturaldrainageways to be retained ,---f . 0 Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent,the contour lines may be at 5 fQot intervals) , tV f1TAmount of propos~d cut and fill , e. Landscape Plan o Drawn by a Landscape Architect '. o Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calcul~tion of landscape coverage . o Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 .. o Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irr.igation system.. o Location and type of street trees o List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genL\s, species, common name, quantity, size, spafing, and 'method of planting f. Architectural Plans Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 6 of 10 o ~xterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site, .. including height .. ... .. o Conceptual floor plans g, On-Site Lighting Plan o Location, orientation, and maximum height of ext.erior light fixtures, both free standing " and attached . . . o Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles,' and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area o Photometric test report for each Iight,source Additional Materials That May be Required IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS! APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: /v/K o o o o o o o o o o o Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the tpp of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW A Geotechnical Report prepared byan engineer must De submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water tabJe present Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the'additional standards of the overlay district. If five or more trees are proposed to be rerTlOved, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 . A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is <! wetland on the property Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and DrainageAlteration permit must be submitted prior to development Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer PRE-SUBMllTAl REC'O AUG 1 9.2008 Revised 111108 Molly Markarian 7 of 10 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I Engineering Division Phone: (541) 726-3753 Fax: (541) 736"1021 MARCH 5, 2004 REQUIRED STORMW ATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY: In October 2003, Springfield Public'Works released a trial "stonnwater scoping sheet," provided to help engineers and developers meet stonnwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice .of decisions. As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process. As of April 12, 2004, the use of stonnwater scoping sheets will be required for all applications which require development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide four (4) copies of a completed . stonnwater scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet, which reflects changes requested by the development community. PLEASE NOtE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO: SUBMIT A COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS DIRECTIONS FOR USING STORMW ATER SCOPING SHEETS ARE AS FOLLOWS: . 1. Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location 2. Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study (note: do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked). 3. Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Public Works Dept., Attn: Matt Stouder 4. Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete stormwater study 5. Include four (4) copies .of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the .!I~"".II.......H....~er study. Stonnwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the Public Works front counter) as well as on the Public Works web page at either: . www.cLsnrin.meld.or.us/Pubworks/whatsnew.htmorunderthelinkfor..fillablefonns~.at www.cLsbrin.meld.or.uslPubworkslDesi!!ll!start.htm. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process. Sincerely, Matt Stouder, Civil Engineer City of Springfield, Public W orkslEngineering Email: mstouder@ci.springfield.or.us Phone: (541) 736-1035 Fax: (541) 736-1021 Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 8 of 10 ~I~W~I~ R ",111111:.. <?BERT [: SHAW ... 656 CharneIton 5t. Eugene, Or. 97401 Ph: (541) 485 - 4963 ARC 'H I T ~L C T sha .....l..I'if.....,..,ilo...I.~ NARRATIVE The property,at.1942 5th street is.currently license as an in home day care center and is authorized for 16 children. The state provider number is CF 501153. We are a 501 C3 non-profit. The request is to change the definition to Standard Child Care Center, thereby authorizing an increase in the number of children to be a maximum of 30 children. These children are 2 years to 6 years of age. 12% to 20% are full time or 4-6 children if the center expands to the maximum. The approximate 80% of the children are half day only. There are no changes to the building. There are no changes in the Public Utilities Plan. There are no changes to the landscaping plan. There are no changes to the on Site lighting plan. There are no wetlands, or riparian areas within the development area. There is no increase in the stormwater run off. PRE.SUBMITTAL RECIO, AUG l 92008 ... .~I 11.1 "'.-. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP PRE2008-000S8 1942 STH Street SITE Map 17-03-26-24 Tax Lot 3000 I . , "d -r _. _..- .'- ~"_. .~, Nortb PRE.SUBMITlAL REC'O AUG 1 9 2008 ill: . rx'.;::" .> c . l~ . ~ SPR~~"ifELD . .J.A'--~ Phone: (?41) 726-3753 Fax: (541) 736-1021 . ;~" "~'''.\ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT / Engineering Division STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK - (Area below this luie filled out by Applicant) - (please return to Matt Stouder@ City ojSpringfleld Public Works Engineering; Fax #736-1021, Phone # 736-1035.) Project Name: '. Applicant: I Assessors Parcel #:' , Date: . I Land Use(s): Phone #: I Project Size (Acres): Fax #: I Approx. Impervious Area: " Email: I " Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): " ~ " PRE~SUBMITIAl REC'U AUG 1 9 200S .;" Drainage Proposal (public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: '" .' -. , _"(Area below thi. line filled out hv the Cilv and Returned to the AImllcant) - (Ai a minimum, all boxes checked by the City 0" the front and back of this sheet shall be submitted for an application to be complete for sulimittal, although other requirements may be necessary.) Drainal!e Studv Tvne ffiDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note. un mav be substituted for Rational Method' D Small Site Study - (use Rational Meth~d for calculations) D Mid-Level Development Study _ (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) . D Full Drainage Development Study - (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: o Wellhead Zone: " D WetlandlRiparian: D Soil Type: Downstream Analvsis:, D o " ' o Hillside Development: Floodway/Floodplain: Other Jurisdictions: " D N/A D Flow line.i'or startillg water surface elevation: o Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: I o Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: ,I ::;;;:= ~ Return to Matt Stouder \al City of Sprinl!field. email: mstouder\alci.sprinl!field.or.us. FAX: (541) 736-1021 I .-k.....-, e~A"IL- d2-e C-0f';j <n.I rO.es'.c WlL.L-,u '-(OJ WIW~ 9 of 10 Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian -'. COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS I ForOfficialUseOnli . -. " .. . . . .- * Based upon the information provided on the front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is needed for an application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site appraval; Additional site specific information may be required Note: Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completedform has' , been signed in the space pravided below:' . Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3) Req'd N/A o 0 All non-building rooftop (NBR).impervious'surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catthbasin wloil filtration media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. " D Where required, vegetative stormwater design sball be consistent with interim design standarlls (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth by the Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) or Clean Water Services (CWS). ' o For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the ~ES for vegetative treatnieht. o If a stormwater treatment swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes; " bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with either BES or CWS requirements. o Water QuRljty calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM D All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containillg equipment located outside of the building, shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant' enclosure. . .,-." D D D o D General Study Requirements (EDSPM Section 4.03) , o 0 Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. o 0 A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. o 0 Calculations showing system capacity ,for a 2-year storm event and overflow effects of a 25-yeai storm event. o D The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined USing a 10 minute start time for developed b~ins. ' Review or Downstream System (EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C) D 0 A downstream drainage analysis as descnoed in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C. On-site drainage shilll be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). o 0 Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicabl~. Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04) o 0 Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. D D Minimum pipe cover shall be I 8 ,inches foirefuforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper erigineering calculations shall be provided when less.' The cover shall be sufficient tosupportan 80,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. o D Manning's "n" vaiues for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to . achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well. OtherlMisc D D '0 o Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains / o Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another I D'Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surlace wlo being treated by one or more BMPs, wit!> the exception of resideniial building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply.to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to the website: www.deo.state.oLus/wo/lIToundwaluichome.hcm for more information. D Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre-development rates for the 2 through 25-year storm events D "This form shall be included as an attachment, inside thefront cover, of the stormwater study " IMPORTANT, ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW AND SIGN! As the engineer of record, I hereby certifY the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study and plan set. I . . ! SignatllTe:.Date: ' ---. ..- . Revised 1{1{08 Molly Markarian 10 of 10 (- ~..;.;. I, \~ ~ ~ >I ~ b " ../.-/ , , I L- (~+_ r--- (.~' """ ~II -::'~- --. :;:;,.1 L~L (, ",!- J \,~J Ell . - lU i .::~. .... (:;:) \ i: f "I; \.oi or - ~ j '.~I ~ ...:.,~I'I"""",,,';;' I \'.ff~:-II i - >~mH I \ "'a,~ I! 1:! , o.~ ~ \ ~_~ =.~ ~-: ~ i /, '" ~ ~~""--jl'':f)' . .-sR-'-:' = In tn ~II ~ ,_,... ;~';' ~ : ~ . . !'.Jm,*:J _ (Il _. --1)-_:- -: :HlJ Z, ..--=-... W "t"'"""-, 'f:j?': ~ (;1 ~ /, '= ~1- !~: "/~'O .,~. il f" ! -T ' ''0" c,~~ /,/J;'u/' I .,_= \..,,=11 " I~ - II I' I . ',', " \' '-., ~ I' \~-:~-i _ ITl"""'" ~~~,..,:,;;;;ic\' \.. /''',,, ~j - I,. ,I.j! ; .. '__.___--rNoC"';;w- _ --:=:_ ) "b_/ ..."",-- .~'01 ~-t~-L",-.'I-- __._~__...___ t G27.<XJ _~--=-""~~~__u';"~_l.I;;;.CUOII" - ~ ""_ _,' ~ ...".-;;:, I 1 i' . -- - ~,_~,_ i:"": ~'I I _"__, __ _ W.OO __.....,....~_............. ~4 _.c' ' i' . __.. ~________,>,/:;::_\d:;J>~---::C,~ -:" > ' i! i @j'ITE PlA~ ~- / i I !. ~,..,";' ~ il ! j I I I' ~. -- .---., ) ~,'f:::::':'::"'i'" ""'""" ~~'" ,,,.,,, ~".'n"u" .~ J DATA \"\.A1\Ii ZONE, CONSTRUCT1ON TYf"f: OCCUPANCY ~ ARl'A Of 6lJILDING TAX LOT AAv. f'AR};JNG PARXJNG/J.Jl.EA WAlK5 AAv. ROOF ~~-CAP PARXJNG SOILTYl"l::: C!>~_~EET SIGN ~:~_.:n.oo -.---:;;-:;;"".....- MlXWCOMM. .- 58 Em~DEtmAL , 1.474~.ft. 17-03-2G-24 3<00 I.05.6CRl: 3 LONG TERM 4.~GI ""I_ ft. 3 TEMP. 400 ""I. ft. 1.474 ""I.R:. I 4 SHORT TERM 7G Mat:obon b3~ 1195km 37:% , , , , :1" ' .~,,",-'1."f. 0" a ~~~r..-r!:;- r:\' V1CI.NtTY I.lAP ~N_T.S ~ 900, 6 'I 9nv a,~3~ l\fJlrvQBnS.3~d ~~ ~'" ""~ 1 ,i!!1J-; ~~ <l(~ :J:: V")... ~ ::.J I-- ~~ ~i t:~ " 'I i; ......- ""~ d...l .a~ o.~ D/~ 8g Oil ~ '" '" ~ ~ z ~ !;; ~ -<( 1.1 . g ,., 8 ; ~ Po. =..1:5 r.::I U ~ f '" . ... I Z UJ , ~ I~ = 11.1 ~ I"""""'''' 1"'-""""'_l'Ji'~ , .........",'" - J~ Page I of2 From: "Barbara J Roberts, P.E." <bjr@rceinc.net>' To: <crhoffman@clearwire.net> .' Cc: '''Robert L. Shaw'" <shawarch ...snip... Don Rowe'" <donnrowe@msn.com> Subject: FW: Children's Choice Montessori Charles: Below is Matt's email that the storm water scoping sheet is not required. Include a copy of this email with the SPR application submitted to the City, so the intake person is aware of this. . , 'Barbara J. Roberts, P.E. LEED ™ Accredited Professional PresidentlPrincipal.Civil Engineer Roberts Consulting & Engineering, Inc Oregon Certified DBE, WBE & ESB 1007 Leonards Way, Suite A Eugene, OR 97404 P (541) 689-9197 F (541) 461-5443' Cell (541) 554-4507 From: prvs= 11 05d77dda= mstouder@cLspringfield.or.us (mailto:prvS=1105d77dda=mstouder@cLspringfield.or.us] On Behalf Of STOUDER Matt Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:20 PM To: Barbara J Roberts, P.E. Subject: RE: Children's Choice Montessori Barbara, A stormwater scoping sheet would not be required for this project. As for.the site design considerations, confirmation of existing drainage patterns and discharge locations would be all that is required. Let me know if you have other questions. Thanks, . Matt Stouder, PE Supervising Civil Engineer Ph (541) 736-1035 From: Barbara J Roberts, P.E. (mailto:bjr@rceinc.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 13; 2008 2:55 PM To: STOUDER Matt Subject: RE: Children's Choice Montessori Matt: I forgot to include: The address for the proposed Children's Choice Mont!lssori is 19425th Street. Thanks again! Barbara J. Roberts, P.E. LEED ™ Accredited Professional President/Principal Civil,Engin~er PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O AUG 1. 9 2008 Roberts Consulting & Engineering, Inc Oregon Certified DBE. WBE & ESB file://C:\DOCUME-l \ROBERT -l.SHA \LOCALS~ 1 \Temp.\eud9.htm 8/15/2008 Page 2 of2 1007 Leonards Way, Suite A Eugene, OR 97404 P (541) 689-9197 F (541) 461-5443 Cell (541) 554-4507 From: Barbara J Roberts, P.E. [mailto:bjr@rceinc.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 20082:52 PM To: 'mstouder@cLspringfield,or.us' Subject: Children's Choice Montessori . Matt: As we discussed, the Children's Choice Montessori is required to go through Site Plan Review since they are changing use and occupancy of the existing facility from an In-Home Daycare to a Day Care Center. No additions' or modifications to the site are occurring at this time. Since there will be no change or modifications to impervious surfaces at this time, no changes in storm water runoff and discharge will occur and.a Stormwater Study is not required. Please confirm pages 9 and 10 of the City Site Plan Review form (Stormwater Management System Scope of Work form and Completed' Study Items checklist) are not required for submittal with the SPR application to the City., Thank you. Barbara J. Roberts, P.E. LEED ™ Accredited Professional President/Principal Civil Engineer Roberts Consulting & Engineering, Inc Oregon Certified DBE, WBE & ESB 1007 Leonards Way, Suite A Eugene, OR 97404 P (541) 689-9197 F (541) 461-5443 Cell (541) 554-4507 No virup found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.3/1611 - Release Date: 8/14/2008 6:20 AM PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O AUG 19 2008 file://C:\DOCUME-I \ROBERT :"I.SHA \LOCALS"-- 1 \Temp\eud9.htm 8/15/2008 GRANTOR'S NAME Judd Van Horbek and Marilyn C. Van Horbek PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O AUG 1 9 2008 1. ReCORDING REQUESTED By FIDELITY NA TlONAL .TITlE COMPANY OF OREGON GRANTEE'S NAME Lucas P. McQuillan and Carta J. McOuillan .. .J..::-~~I ~~GOROINGRETURN TO FJl....~:...., :.' ,'; ;,:;ii")NAl TrrtE INS1J!1.~,NCe \.,;.. ..'-','.v:.. 0F OnEGON C..,\i l:!L1~Jl':!!l;T (,::: ST., #500 EUGliNE, OR ~1401 Sr;NO TAX STATeMENTS TO: Mr. arid Mrs. Lucasp, McQuillan 522 65th Street Springfield. OR 97478 AfTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Mr. and MIS; LucasP. McQuiltan 522 65th Street Springfield. OR 97478 :.t'At.1; AtlUVt. 1M'::' LlI'lI; "'Uti Htl...OHU~-::' U::'l STATUTORY WARRANTY DeED Judd Van Horbek and Marilyn C. Van Horbek as 1enantsby the entirety. Grantor, conveys and warrants to Lucas P. McOuillan and-Carla J. MeOuiDan as tenanls by the entirety, Grantee, the following described real property, tree and clear of encumbrances except as specifically set forth below, situated in the County of lane, State of Oregon, See attached legal description as Ell:hiblt ONE hereto Subject to and. excepting: Covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements of records 2007-08 real property taxes a lien but not 'fet due and Payable BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULO INQUIRE ABOUT TI1E PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 197.352, THiS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLDW USE OF TI1E PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITHTI1E APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMliNTTO VERIFY APPROVED USES, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FORliST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.93D AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PflOPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 197.352. THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS $375,000.00 IS.. ORS 93.030) DATED: JulV 3, 2007 CL;..t"7C~~ ....~an Horbsk ..--. V' '(Y\~~. i/~ MarilYn C. Van Horbele. STATE OF OREGON LC-..~ COUNTY OF I' Diviaion of Chi.' Dopul,y CI.rk Lena CoUnty Do_da end R.cord. m7~~1S "- ~m~~lill!Wll!~II!~~,~L 02:34~::': RPR-DEEll Cnt=l 5h=B ClISHIER 01 SIO.DO $II,DO SID,DO This instrument was acknowledged before me on '1-5 -<21 ~n ~ "arilvn C. Van Ho,bek - ~ -- NOTARY ~c FOR OREGO) ~ MY CO~SIO~YDI.n:~ ...~l,UUoI_olo"iUo..u...:ro~ ~_ OF'~1AL6eA\. . B QETZ OIU!GON NOJAKY PlIa Ie - 393501 ~ ",c~~~!l:lI~SJULY''''O' : >.: FORD-313 (R.'v 2/36} loswdDlld.wpd>I05.0Gl STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED "o<t"':P~ ll~ i. .( . EXHIBIT "ONE" Order No. 03-110950-46 Commencing at a point in tha West line of 5th SUeelof the Town of Springfield, lane County, Oregon, extended, which is 627 .B2feet West and 694.41 feet North of the Southeast corner of Jacob Halsteed and wife Donation land Oaim No. 47, Section 26, Township 17 South, Ranga 3 Wast of the WiUamette Meridian, In lane County Oregon; thence North on and along said West line of 5thh Street 72.96 feet; thence due West 627 feet; thence South 72.96 feet; thence EllSt 627 feet, more or less, to the Point at Beginning, seid land being a part of tha Seavey tracts lying North of Springfield, lana County, Oragon. 2 PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O AUG 1 9 2008 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 541-726-3759 Phone r...., of Springfield Official Receipt L-_felopment Services Department . Public Works Department RECEIPT #: 2200800000000901257 Date: 08/1912008 9:15:03AM Paid By CLADD ENTERPRISES Item Total: . <":heck Number Authorization Re~eived By Batch Number Number How Received Amount Due 346.00 $346.UU Job/Journal Number. PRE2008-00058 Des~ription . CTY Site Plan Rvw Tentative Payments: Type of Payment Check Amount Paid emm 1265 In Person Paymenl Total: $346.00 $346.00 PRE.SUBMIITAlREC'D AUG 19.2008 '- cReceintl Page 1 of 1 8/19/2008