HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 7/2/2008
. ,
City of Springfield
Development Services Department'
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'u
JUL 0 2 2008
SPRINGFIELD
~.
Site Plan Application or Major Modification, Type II
!
Type II Site Plan R~view: !Xl
.. .. . K-~Wvt~
Major Site Plan Major Modification D
. - . -...-
Applicant Name: Hamilton Construction Co.
Company:, I
Address: Ip.o. Box 659. SDrinqfield, OR 97477'
APPli~an~'s ~e'p~;'IScot; M:~ris' ,._".,;H'....U
Company: IOlson & Morris
Address: 1380 Q Street, Ste 200 ... Sprinqf~eld, OR.
.~ ~..;~.;~,~_. <;;K'~T ,h ~_,iH' ..<;J<"'~_<;;0-~""F 'we -.c,' ....f..,elf!.
'I ~ho~e: 1(5;1) ~02-9790
IFax: 1(541) 485,3253
97477
." . " ---:. \.
IPho~e:I(541) 746'2426
IFax: I
Property Owner':'
Company:
Address:
,",J., <;::> .
'.... .../
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-03-01-00 TAX L;OT NO(s): 300
Property Address: 2213 South 'F' Street J;
,
Size of Property: 18,21 Total ' approx. 0.5 develop area Acres [g] Square Feet
Proposed. Name of Project: HamiltonConstructionFabrlcation Shop
, . -{.JL . '... ,"'.' _,'." '''".. ,..:.,",,,,",.. .,'-,',.. .1'"L~ \I, " , ". ..._".',.^)' ~.".:!'_..""
Description of
Proposal:
Construct new 6000 square foot fabrication building & associated utilities
# of Lots/Parcels: Avg. Lot/Parcel Size: sf Density:
New Impervious S!-,rface Coverage: 6000 . .,s!_ ~Idg. Gross Floor Are,a:
"'.-:,...;;ri....._.G~;;;~'^." ..,,,,J:':_,{_..~,..,:~.1t:\:: - . ,.t~'S-;- ""c. .,~ < ."
dujacre
6000 sf
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
,'I
. -.
. . - -
Zoning: Hi - Heavy Industrial
Applicable Refinement Plan: None
Location: City Limits [g]
Associated Apl!lications: None
.-" :""-'f -,-,$ '.' ,"- ,'''>I - " '" ,;;. ....~.. ",,,, '.\;...'- '.1
Overlay District: None
Plan Designation: HI
Urban Growth Boundary D
"
if^/:;,t..:""-r;:,;'r',-;"'t -':;r
. '>. _' . ,~.. . '.w'--
Pre-Submittal....-v./... /1r:vr1J l1. ,,,", .
Case No.: 11l-.G lM-O - ODD ,5IDate:
7- ;),:08
Reviewed by:
(initials) TJ
Reviewed by:
(initials)
Total Fee: c./f..3tfloCP
l, "'- ,.
Case No.: Date:
Application Fee: :/I 31-to ~ Postage. Fe~: .
'.;: ,1.7.... "..' ."~..;.,v..;;';~"O~_" ". ';'t ',i' ~ ., ',' ..,...,.....- .--.,
--
"
~~'?m8 - a:x:lf3
-
Steps in the Process:
1. The Applicant Submits a Pre-Submittal Meeting Application
The Pre-Submittal Application is mandatory. Please refer to the Springfield Fee Schedule
for the Pre-Submittal Application fee. The submittal package must confqrm to the
application completeness checklist attached to' this form." You are required to submit 7
copies of the submittal requirements packet for pre-submittal review. Pre-submittal
meetings will be conducted every Tuesday and Friday between 10:00 am and noon. We
will strive to conductthe Pre-Submittal meeting within five to seven working days of
receiving the application.
2. Applicant and the City conduct the Pre-Submittal M,eeting
We strongly encourage you, the owner and design team to attend the Pre,Submittal
meeting. The meeting wilL be held with representatives from Public Works Engineering
and Transportation, Community Services (B'uilding), Fire Marshall's office, and the
Planning Division, The meeting will be scheduled for 30 ~o 60. minutes. The Planner will
provide you with a Pre,Submittal Checklist at the end of the meeting specifying the items
required to make the application complete-if it isn't already complete. You will then have
180 days to make the application complete for submittal ,and acceptance by the City.
3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application
When you have addressed all of the items on the Pre,Su6mittal Checklist, please submit
18 copies of the complete application to the City. A fee will be collected at that time and
the 120 day calendar review period will begin. When the'iPlanner has prepared a draft
land use decision, the draft will be mailed/faxed to the applicant/owner/design team for
their review, At the applicant's request, the planner will schedule a meeting to review the
,
draft with appropriate staff if certain issues need resolution before the final land use
decision is issued.
Owner's Signature
This application will be used for both the required Pre-Submittal Meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. .Owner'ssignatures are requ(red at both stages in the
application process. An application without the Owner's signature will not be
accepted.
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate
forscheduling of the Pre,Submittal Meeting,
owner:4~k ~
4'~~ -:
Date:
0~~
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
JUL 0 2 2008
KoA.€:?-;- tJ. 4 /Z./~
Print
-1'
I represent this application to' be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the
completeness check performed on this' application at the Pre,Submittal Meeting, I affirm the
. information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided
herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal,
and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This
statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining
to a complete application
Owner:
Date:
Signature
Print
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O
JUL 0 2 Z008
I
3.
/
4.'
~)fr
I
\-1\1\'
Ii::,\
Site Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist
~~
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O
*If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reasori Why and attach theJtpfpI6~~ffllll
to this form, '
,
1.
Application fee"refer to the Development Code Fee S~hedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula, A copy of the fee schedule is ayailable at the Development Services
Department. The application fee and current postage fee is collected at the time of
complete application submittal. '
Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report-on~ copy issued within the past 30
days documenting ownership.and listing all encumbran~es. If the applicant is not the
property owner, written permission, from the property owner is required,
One additional copy of ttie Site Plan reduced to 8 '(2 "x 11", which will be mailed as
part of the required neighboring property notification packet.
Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property
has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
Stormwater Management System Study-four cop;e~ of a study with the completed
Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, supporting calculations and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and
, Procedures Manual. .
2.
s.
6. Traffic Impact Study-four copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC Section 32.020(1)(c). Traffic Impact Studies (TIA) allow the City to
analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation :Of a development on the City's
transportation system. In general, a TIA must explain how the traffic from a giyen
development affects the transportation system in term~ of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems, A TIA must also
, ,;:.
address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land ,use:and transportation policies and
objectives. I
7. cve00Pies of the following plan sets for the Pre-Suhmittal Meeting
OR .
Eighteen copies of the following plan sets for Comple~e Application Submittal
All of the following plans must include the scale (appro~riate to the area inyolyed and
sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" =
100'), north arrow, and date of preparation. All plan sets must be folded to 8V2" by 11"
and bound by rubber bands for submittal.
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
JZf Prepared by an Oregon licen'sed Landscape Arc~itect or. Engineer
Vicinity Map . . .
JZf The name, location and dimensions of all eXistirJg site features including
buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what
is remaining and what is being removed
)2J Required setbacks to the proposed new property' lines for existing structures to
remain on site' .
J2l The name, location, dimensions, direction of f1qiN. and top of bank of all .
, watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality
Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Develop'ment Services Department
....
,
(:::' . ,.
;zr The 100-year fl~Plain and floodw?y boundaries on the site, as specified in the
latest adopted FEMA Flood, Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map
Amendment or Letter of Map Revision .1
JZf The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Article 17 of the Springfield
Development Code and delineated on the Welli;lead Protection Areas Map on file
in the Development Services Department
% Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater
when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and
shrubs;riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings
% Soil.types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils
Survey of Lane County, A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be
submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development
area has unstable soils and/or a high water table'
b. Site Plan
"
, ,
,0 Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect or Engineer
o Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the
parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines,
distance between buildings
;a'Location and height of existing or proposed fences, outdoor equipment, storage,
trash receptacles, and signs ' . .
JZf Location, dimensions and number of typical, compact and disabled parking
spaces; including"aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs and stripil;g
,21' Lot coyerage calculations of all parking and vehicular areas .
:a-'On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation
. zr Access to streets, alleys and properties to be served, including the location and
J dimensions of. existing 'and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be
closed . , ,
i2l Location of on-site exterior lighting .
~ocation, type and number of bicycle parking spaces
~ Location of el)isting and proposed transit faciliti~s
Phased Development Where applicable, the Site Plan application shall include a
phasing plan that indicates any proposed phases for development, induding the
boundaries and sequencing of each phase as may be permitted in Section 31.040 of
the Development Code, Phasing shall progress in a.,sequence that promotes street
connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodates
other required p~blic improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer,
stormwater lTli~lnagement, water and electricity.
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
c. Improvement and Public Utilities Plan
2l"'Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer
2T Location of all existing and proposed easements
~Location, widths and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys,
dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed
development, , . . .. '
:a'Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting
.:;:? Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hyarants, power
"r,(poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units. and similar public facilities
)LJ Location and width of all existing ana p'roposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps,
pedestrian access ways and trails
o Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 feet of the top
of bank of any Water Quality limited watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of
Jhe top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
~ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently
if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present .
o Where the deyelopment area is within an overlay district applicable, address the
,!dditional standards of the overlay district ,
o If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as
specified in SDC Articie 38 .
o A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon 'Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property ,
o Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence
the permit application has been submitted for ~eview
o Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a
,Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted with the building permit
application
o Where applicable, any Discretionary Use, Varia.nce or Modification of Provisions
as specified in SDC Articie 10 or 11
PRE.SUBMIITAL REC'O
.JUL 022008
OILSON &
MloRRllS
A division of
L.B. Olson & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
land Surveyors
Urban Planners
380 Q Street
Suite 200
Springfield, Oregon 97477
(541) 302,9790
Fax: (541) 485,3253
olsonandmorrjs,com
Hamilton Construction Project
New 6000 Square Foot Fabrication Shop
Owner
Hamilton Construction Inc.
Attn: Robert Hirte
P.O, Box 659
Springfield, OR 97477
Aoolicants Reoresentatiye
Olson & Morris
Attn: Scott Morris, PE
380 Q Street, Ste 200
Springfield, OR 97477
Architect
Nagao Pacific Architecture
Attn: Rodd Hansen
1680 Pearl Street
Eugene, OR 97401
Contractor
Chambers Construction LLC
Attn: Daye Hoffman
3028 Judkins Road, #1
Eugene, OR 97403
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
Proiect Overview
Hamilton Construction, lnc, is a construction company that specializes in bridge and
railway construction. They haye been located at 2213 South 'F' Street in Springfield
since 1953, with the site being approximately 18.2 acres in size, They are a large
employer with more than 100 employees (most in the field), with about 25 employees at
the South 'F' Street site, Due to the complexity of their projects, much of the parts for
bridge and railway construction are pre-fabricated at this location and deliyered to their
yarious job sites,
The CUITent site is gravel due to the industrial nature of the operation (paying would be
hard to maintain), The existing conditions plan shows that the majority of the property is
being used for material storage, with the western buildings on the site being used as
office and pre-fabrication.
l/
L
The current fabrication process involyes the (2) most western buildings and the western portion
of the office building. This ptoposal is to construct a new 6000 square foot fabrication building
which will consolidate to operation.
As shown on the site plan, the new building willbe southeast of the existing fabrication building,
connected with a new 'concrete ramp, This will eliminate the current internal traffic pattern for
forklifts and 'utility vehicles driYing through the yard to other buildings. This will provide (3)
benefits to the operation: . ,
"
, ,
I. ,Intern'al fabrication.operation will be moreefficierit.
2, Reducing utility vehicle travel through the yard is safer.
3. Reducing utility trayel on the gravel surface will improve air quality,
Upon completion of this new fabrication building, Hamilton Construction, Inc, is proposing to
remove the existing secure sto~age' building (shown as phas~'2 on the ~iteplan),
. . ".' " 1"'j
; " "\1,
Phasing
.~
This sitc was originally built out over many years in a pattern that is not conducive to their
current operation. HamiltonCOIistruction, Inc. is planriing to alter the site layout of buildings in
the coming years to'better:utilize'the site, However, the plan for the entire site has not been'
determineCl.' i, ' ,.' ,
The site plai1 shows two other items as future phases, Phase one is the new fabrication building.
with associated utilities, Phase two would be the remoyal of the current secure storage building
aftei' the fabrication shop is complete, Phase three would most likely be removing the existing
. fabrication office and sawshop with \he intent of eventually xeplacing it with their main
headquarters 'office building, Since thiIl will'lnost likely bea longer time frame than 3 years, it
was not included in this site reyiew application:' ' ,."" , . , .
Traffic Circulation '& Parkin" '
Since-this is a heavy industrial construction operation, the site is not open to yisitors or even
clients without checking into the office, Therefore, the main. parking area is at the north of the
, ". . I' .
property on the north side'oftlie'existing office, There are (3) other areas'within' the yard
designated for employee parking, but they currently are gravel.
There is no reed for yisitors to the site to be in the new fabrication shop, Therefore, we are not
proposing a pav'ed road or pedestrian way from the office to this new building, There are
currently about 25 employees who are at the site during the day, and there is currently adequate
area in front ofthe;office and within the yard for parking,
Utilities
PRE.SUBMITfAL REC'O
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
"'1:J
::::0
rn
.
'-. en
c: c=:
r- c:o
c s:::
IS . ;;::I
::J>
"', r-
c
c ::::0
C< rn
("')
d
(f)
I
-.) 2, fJ lT1
'"
-;
I
I
-7
/
I
~---
- ----
/'
/
/
~
'V.
/
/
/
/ <)~
/
/
.._---~
/
/
/
/
\
'~
\
,/
/
o
c ....
;~ '
?,;r /
/.
,~
:ii '/1'- \
it / "" ~
I! / ~ "
/,,_l 1_ ',!, "
,.// (;J'/ " '. '.', ""
"/ ~., '- "-
/ <~:..*';> '-',- /
(' /" ,~-,'.' ----7"---1
I,""" ~-...:.:__:~ '
'...1 c.: ......., I
1\ I .' ,,... "--:---7--' I
I '.J ...... '. ..... ~,-~7-"'--:-~ .<. . '..> . ...... I I _ /
/ /",,'/-',---~--~ ,....:.-~' 'j :,/"
-------J (;, I ,
--.....c-._ , .. '.' " I I
:::-'-=-"-1 ~ ("'---_,. ---~-;r<~~---p J /
...:. '. Y 'I; .... .---~----L ---
_~~_I'J \-~~~~--~.--_:, --- -j r'
'~--'-' ., r, ," ---_ ----.--./ I
'-::;=-,-'---./ I ',. --___ ----_J
~:--:.?t., L___\-:.-.:.."__~"_ ...-~-0-:-~>~--j !
--- \r-:-7--i---___ ----.::-.:-~.::----::J ~ I
--0-__" \.. . .'. J" '. ..-----_ ,- ij I
. '.' '.". .,j) -'--,.:..::.::_ . '.' ...... ....--r-;:-~-:--j J I
=--_--~--,: ry/~-c-~~~ ..~~~~~. 'c.~,,--i_~~ ;'
'J /(~~::. .... . . ..' .. ". >- I
'--- </ /W--~====--<'::-.:~-e:.-~-,'-.:.::-==-J I
/;/. . . ...q C '. .,. --~:------- . - ;,
~~ . ..r l -"-~:~~~~.'~'_'.:" ---- 7')"f"
,
\
\.- -,
III!!
u':!
I I ~
II
nnnnnlp
I I 8 8 ! i I I I i IiI
II!!! II ~
'J M
"I
i
i
, i
a I!J " H"J I> a. I
AI
..........:0::
'li'j'" ~
.il ii"
f8i.l.I'
!I&'(I'
.,!l@
ill'!i:
. -\
Jilll ~ .
.
~ ----1
~
.
-.-
,
~
~~;~s& iii:
JIlGSI.SlJltZlll r Consulting
~OIl,...n .
~~'IJCI:"'l'Ill Engin",,".
II r..,~').,...~. &Surreyors
Site Development Plan
lOT Phase 1 of ~
Hamilton Constructi'on
ll.[VISlur-;s
~
~~
""".{"T'~
""-;-"-,,,.",, .....
"''',l[;WfVO'
",VIEWED"
SpriTl!lfield. La.ne County
;"Oregon
n
':.,
,
1651 CENTENNIAL BLVD, . SPRINGFIElD,,oR 97477
P,O, BOX 931 . SPRINGFIElD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.741.19Bl
FAX: 541.741.0619
A.
~
~
'~
~,.,,,,,,,,,"'"
~~i'.-. """
, gx~,rg{~~n .
TiTlE INSURANCE SERVICES' ESCROW ClOSINGS
875 COUNTRY CLUB RD, . EUGENE, DR 97401
p.o, BOX 10211 . EUGENE, OR 97440
PHONE: 541.687,9794
FAX: 541.687,0924
July 2, 2008
Our Order No,; ELT-55804
PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT
Olson & Morris
380 "Q" Street Ste 200
Springfi,eld, Oregon 97477
Attn: Larry Olson
Estimated.Premium for:
PARTIAL BILLING
$200,00
TOTAL
$200,00
Dear Larry:
We are prepared to issue on request and on recording of the appropriate documents, a policy or
Policies as applied for, withcoyerages as indicated,based on this preliminary report,
J;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A
ShowingJee simple title as of Julie 26,2008, at8:00 a,m" vested in:
HAMILTON CONSTRUCTION CO, (OREGON),
an Oregon corporation
Subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms, copditions and exceptions
contained in the policy form, No liability is assumed until a full'premium has been paid ,
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
CONTINUED
"IN OUR BUSINESS, YOU MATTER MOST"
\'vww.evergreenlandtitle.com, .
)
ELT - 55804
Page 2
..
SCHEDULE B
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS I
. I .
1, Taxes or assessments which are not shown as ~xisting li~n~ by the records of any i~ing
authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings
by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or,notices of such proceedings,
whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records,
, I,'
. '.
2, Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shoWn by the public records but which could
be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by rbaking inquiry or persons in possession
I
thereo f. I
3. Easements, or c'laims of easement, not shown ~y the public"records; reservations' or
exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the isduance thereOf; water rights, claims or title to,
water.
4. Any encroachment (of existing improvements located on the subject land onto adjoining
j'j .
land or of existing improvements located on adjoining land onto the subject land),
encwnbrance, violation, yariation; or adverse circJmstance affecting the title that would be
disclosed by an accurate and complete land surve~ of the subject land, '
. ' I
5, Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, material, equipment rental or workers
compensation heretofore or hereafter furnished, irrlposed by hiw and not shown by the public
I '
records.
CURRENT EXCEPTIONS
,
,
6. Rights of the public and of goyemmental bodie;; in and to that portion of that portion of the
premises herein described lying below the high water mark of Mill Race and the ownership of
the State of Oregon in and to that portion lying belbW the high water mark thereof
, ! ;,'
, I ,
7, Any adverse claim based upon the assertion that'the location, of Mill Race has moved and
that any portion of the subject property has ,been cr~atedby artificial means or has accreted to
such portions so created, or based on the provisions of ORS 274,905 through 274.940.
. .' I
, ,
8, Reservation as contained in Deed Recorded May 27,1936, Book 186, Page 249, Reception
No, 42663, Lane County Oregon Records, I ,
9, Right-of- W~y Easement, granted to Pacific PoJer & Light Cornpany, a corporation;
including the terms and provisions thereof, by instryunent Recorded March 30, 1965, Reception'
No, 97387, Lane County Oregon Records. i', . ' . "
10, Grant of Easement, granted to the City of Springfield, including the terms and provisions
. " I' , .
thereof, by instrwnentRecordedMarch 18,1964, R,eception No. 49010, Lane County Oregon
Records. '
,
CONTlNDED
PRE-SUBMllTAl REC'D
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
I
I
"
ELT - 55804
Page 3
1 L Declaration of Private Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, by instrument
, I' ,
Recorded February 27, 1998, Reception No, 98,14019, Lane,80unty Oregon Records.
I "
12. Improvement Agreement with the City o{Sphngfield, in;luding the terms and provisions
thereof, by instrument Recorded August 21, 1998l Reception :No, 98-66754, Lane County
Oregon Records, i"
I
13, Deed of Trust, including the terms and provisions thereof, executed by Hamilton
Construction Co, (Oregon), an Oregon corporatio~, as Gnmtor(s), to Cascade Title Co" as
Trustee, for the benefit of ACC, Inc., an Oregon corporation, as Beneficiary, DatedAugust 7,
",' I ,
2002, Recorded August 7, 2002, Reception No, 2002,059840"Official Records of Lane
I
County, Oregon, given to, secure payment of a Note for $1,219,825,00,
I ;,
. I l'
NOTE: Taxes, Map No, 18-03-01-00,00300, Code 19cOO, Ac(\ountNo, 0578003,2007-2008,
$8,307.42, paid in full. I:
Very truly yours,
EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY
HOME OFFICE
NOTE: The address of the property to be insuredp.e;ein is: 22P SOUTH "F" STREET,
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477. , I
NOTE: A JUDGEMENT/LIENIBANKRUPTCY!SEARCH was done for the name(s) ,
HAMILTON CONSTRUCTION CO, (OREGON), and as of June 26, 2008, none were found,
NOTE: 'As of June 26, 2008, there are no lie~s fori the City of ~pringfield.
INFORMATIONAL NOTE: The current yesting deed and all changes back to the deed which
vests ownership 24 months ago are as follows: ' I l'
I .'
WARRANTY DEED RECORDED June 7,1988, FROM HARRY L HAMILTON AND
WILLIAM T. PECKHAM, FORMERLY DOING BUSINESS AS HAMILTON & THOMS, A
PARTNERSHIP CONSISTING OF HARRY L HAMILTON ANn" WILLIAM T, PECKHAM,
TO JM,MILTON CONSTRUCTION CO, (OREG0N), AN OREGON CORPORATION,
RECEPTION NO. 88-22344. ,:' I,
, I
I
,
1
I
I
I
\
IJaA
By:
I
,
I
I
1
NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREUNDER uNTIL POLICY IS ISSUED AND
I . ,.
PREMIUM PAID. IF FOR ANY REASON THE REPORT IS CANCELLED, A MINIMUM
CANCELLATION FEE OF $200,00 WILL BE CHARGED,
effrey K. Walker
Advisory Title Officer
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
JUL 0 2 200S
-
ELT -.55804
Page I of I
Legal Description
I
. EXHIBIT A
I
, I
Begi1ming at a point on the Southerly right,of,way lineofthe:Southem Pacific Railroad
1218.66 feet East and 5io,26 feet North ofthe rejentrant angle of the Isaac Briggs Donation
Land Claim No, 39, in Township 18 South, Rang~ 3 West of the, WilIamette Meridian (said
Point of Beginning being by record 100,0 feet Sohtherly at right angles to Engineer's
Centerline Station 469 +78,0 of said railroad); ~d running th~nce South 00 01' East 287,7
feet; thence South,550 51' East 86,7 feet; thence South 41026' East 609,9 feet; thence South
48034' East 138.10 feet; thence South 640 II.' Edst 126,8 feet; thence South'700 37' East
I ,
429.29 feet; thence North' 00 01' West 975.24.feet to the Southerly right,of,way line of said
railroad; thence North 840 27' West along the SoJtherly righhof,way line of said railroad
1102.0 feet to the Place of Beginning, i~ LaneColmty, Orego~,
~
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O
JULo 2 ZOOB
,\ ~~O 3-0)
\, ~-- '. '
, ,','1 ---___
Nk ~>:'';;-J'''''-_
yet>' ---,.
''\I~ 33ge ' "'I"
? p~ I ./.16'1
)~ il~"fao
II ~ A~;:,>q-,
-'-:p .4"'~ r,# 0../ "
'?, ~<:;""";3'c,7_-,,{5 (~I :x W
~ J I.
f'.o ~ - L, .... }' S. 2739
. I ~'/fj,~,
ON MAP ~i
I.. /(, 0; ,
35.}'
~ .
'~
J.r:..."=---"'....
....-.....~'-s.84..[Iq" '\
~ 8.q.. ~ lE.
. Ge'J'6"c;
3ss. '4,s'
-~ ~ 3800
."t . 2.51 AC.
AI. ,,\0> 2\"
X
1tl[<\ ,.1..,...
:~ -: lo....l'J
~~I~Kr
'f\"' Q
I. ... I t1J~ . t
IV;" 'I, .!:o'
~. ....
.A""'7'~I,r'
I 0 .
'TE 0
/7 03
300
'l.d~'~,
- "",-, 20'
-s-;:: ~.~.w
@-'--- --
__ --r:.
------
1C
)0'9.
[
,J
......
<
: 400 )
&,1 701
"';'9,'13 \ 23.05 AC.
4o~. L...-- _
- ,
EA,S.;:-g"7~' ---
INT. ELL COR.
_6.~~~Gg~. O<9~02
~g'~
.ii~
r'
o
a~:;;'" S:.
~....e.~e\.'
< '
'5...,,<> ,":.
II!. \~4.e
v 0 0-C.:'+ J)...:Z.7~(,:. ~ .-.. -=..
"'"S9"4~e:;w"'\4.~' e-e. 0
()'-'
()
()
J
t
,5. e 'I"
s
3700
""'CI
;;c
i""n
.
'- c:r.>
c: c:
r- l:rI
<:::> :s:
N> 5i!
'" r-
= ;;:0
=
00 rn
(""')
d
20C
lJJ Q~
"-
THIS MAP IS TO ASS1S(
'lOCATING PROPERTY
THE COMPANY ASSU!./,E:: NO
LIABILITY FOR INACCURACIES,
-:..
N
W \17 E
5
COURTESY OF
&veWREEN LAND TITLE CO
'''1.198\
,
" CATALOG NO
TYPE NO.
FloodPak Series
FPS
ORDERING INFORMATION
Catalog Number: Example: FPS150NLXL-l
1 FPsl
I
I SERIES I
FPS'
FloodPak
Small
I WATTAGE I
42,42W
IO-lOW
100,100W
150,150W,
I
I LAMP SOURCE I
NLX'High
Pressure
Sodium
(NPF)
HFL'Compact
Fluorescent
HID units supplied with cJeaT'medium base lamp.
ACCESSORIES
FPSKNUCKLE - 1;2" Adjustable Knuckle,
FPSARM - Shoebox Arm, Converts
FloodPak to pole-mount (minimum 4"
square pale), '
TECHNICAL INFORMATlOI'i
C l-jJlt
1~1O'-1 1-111/2.-1
",:.0.;.
"<-:i;~'.1ii~,;...
:@
UL Wet Location listed.
1(1fQ.3
JOB NAME
1120 I
I '
I VOLTAGE I:,
1-12QV ,)
I LAMP I
l-Lamp
furnished
FPSSHIELD - Vandal Shield, Helps
protect lens and lamp from breC?kage.
Clear polycarOOnate shield snaps in'place
over glass lens. I'
PRE"SU~~ITTAL REC'O
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
Sloneo
1.5-1
PRODUCT
SPECIFICATIONS
.' The FloodPak is a perfect blend
of architectural design and
perfonnance.
. The FloodPak can be surface
mounted in various positions. Use
IT as a cut'off wallpack or tip it up
22.so tor forward throw with
semi-cut-off. Tip it up 450 for
. floodlighting, or turn it over and
use it for indirecVaccent lighting.
. The FloodPak can also be pole
mounted or ground mounted
using mounting accessorie~.
. Precision die cast aluminum
construction. All exposed
hardware is stainless steel.
. Duraplex II dark bronze polyester
powder finish is standard but the
FloodPak is available in a variety
of designer colors.
. Hinged door frame with clear
tempered glass lens,
. Multi-faceted reflection system
~ provides uniform distribution.
. Injection molded triple finger
.. silicone gasket.
.. UL wet location listed for above
or below horizontal aiming.
. Complete with a UL approved
mounting box rated for 900C
supply wire with integral bubble
level.
. Integra! heat sink ensures cool
operation.
. Meets IESNA cut~off requirements.
. Contractor Friendly .;:::sign with
"''<':i'.integral cable penniling easy:'
hands free wiring.
Crcsccn~flonco
120 E. Gloucester Pike. Barrington, NJ 08007.856-546-5500
(1'"-......-..
1.5-1
HoodPak Series FPS'
PHOTOMETRies
3MH I
J /C~
J .0,\
~~r'
,I
I~~~
::: -I
,~/
.J /' ~
I I I
3MH 2MH lMH 0 lMH 2MH 3MH
FPS150NLXL-l @22S ,
,
3MH 2MH lMH 0 lMH 2MH 3~~
FPS150NLXL,1 @OO
3MH I I
2MJ ~~.:\
J ~r\ \
oj ;f /' ?)25 ,5
[\1,0 )~.1
I
:] I '~J~/I.
I_I '~
3MH- --,
I I I
3MH 2MH IMH 0 lMH 2MH 3MH
FPS150NLXL -1 @ 450
FoOTCANDLE CORRECTION
Multiply thefoltowing factors times the
footcandle values ~or changes in
mounting height.
To Change from 15'
New Hght. 8' 10' 15' 20'
Factor 3:5 2.3 1.0 0.6
LAMP AND WATT CONVERSIONS
Lamp 50W ': 70W 100W 150W
Multiplier .25 0.4 .59 1.0
MOUNTING OPTIONS
I
.~.~
00 Down
22.50 Down
A50 Down
00 Up
22.5" Up
450 Up,
(I'_m"'....... -
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
!.,escenlflonco
120 E: Gloucester Pike. Barrington, NJ 08007. 856-546~5500
10/03
CATALOG NO.
TYPE NO,
FloodPak Series
FPM
ORDERING INFORMATION
JOB NAME
Catalog Number: Example: FPM175MAL-8
I FPM I
I
SERIES
FPM-
FloodPak
Medium
I WATTAGE I
57-5'[W
7O-70W
100,100W
150,150W
175,175W
I
I
I LAMP SOURCE I
MA-Metal Halide
(eWA)
LX~High Pressure
Sodium
(HX-HPF)
HFL -Compact ~
Fluorescent
PMA-Pulse Start
Metal Halide
(HX,HPF)
-,
HID units. supplied. with clear medium base lamp.
ACCESSORIES
L~
I LAMP I
L-Lamp
furnished
I
I VOLTAGE I
1-120V
8-120V '
208V
240V, :~ >
277V
FPSKNUCKLE - 112" Adjustable Knuckle,
FPSARM - Shoebox Arm, Converts
FloodPak to pole-mount (minimum 4"
square pole),
,
FPMSHIELD - Vandal Shield, ~elps
protect lens and lamp from breakage.
Clear polycarbonate shield snaps in place
over glassJens. .
TECHNICAL INFORMATION
~~\
I I -'~""
- 12" I -12-7/8"'-
fl-=rBO
~
'@
Ul Wel Location Usled.
10/03
.,
PRE-SUBMITfAl REC'O
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
Sloneo
1.5-2
PRODUCT
SPECIFICATIONS
. The FloodPak is a perfect blend,
of architectural design and
performance.
. The FJoodPak can be surface
mounted in various positions. Use
it as a Gut-off wallpack or tip it up
22.50 'for forward throw with
semi-cut-off. Tip it up 450 for
floodlighting, or turn it over and
use it for indirect/accent lighting.
. The FloodPak can also be pole
mounted or ground mounted
using mounting accessories.
. Precision die cast'aluminum
construction, All exposed
hardware is stainless steel.
. Duraplex IJ dark bronze polyester
powder finish is standard but the
RoodPak is available in a variety
of designer colors.
. Hinged door frame with clear
tempered glass lens.
. Multi-faceted reflection system
provides uniform distribution.
. Injection molded triple finger
silicone gasket.
. UL wet location listed for above
or below horizontal aiming.
. Complete with a UL approved
mounting box rated for 900C
supply wire with integral bubble
level.
. Integral heat sink ensures cool
operation.
. Meets IESNA cut,off requirements,
. . Contractor Friendly design with
integral cable permrting easy,
hands free wiring.
crcsecnlfloneo
13"__..........
120 E. Gloucester p'ike. Barrington, NJ 08007. B?6-546-5500
1.5-2
Flood~ak Series FPM
PHOTOMETRies
:::1
3MH1
1
I, I
;; ~ I
//~ ,
g~~'1
(, ((r~~)'
( ~,-.J) \
~ "-J /' II
.,~.//
\: ,
-I
::: /I;:;~~--
1MH __-/-hf /~ .
o /(r~ I
J \\\' (,,~ .
2MH __I \ ~~;;I:__
~~/
, '-----
3M1 . 1
3MH1
I
:]
, I
0.__
\
3MH 2MH 1MH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH
. 3MH 2MH 1MH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH
FPM175MAL-8@00
FPM 175MAL,8 @ 22.5"
3MH1
1- I 1
~-:"'\I
'/
~~~ 5"
~I(~t'
~
J' /
'---: /
I
FOOTCANDLE CORRECTION
Multiply the following factors times the
footcandle values for changes in
mounting height.
2MH -
1M:1
J
J
To Change from 15'
New Hght. 8' 10' 15' 20'
Factor 3.5 2.3 1.0 0.6
3MH -
lAMP AND WATT CONVERSIONS
Lamp 70W 100W 150W 175W
Multiplier .36 .57 OJ 1.0
3MH 2MH 1 MH 0 1 MH 2MH 3MH
FPM175MAL-8 @ 450
MOUNTING OPTIONS
~...-.
00 Down
22.50 Down
450 Down
00 Up
22.5" Up,
450 Up
(1""..."'._....
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'O
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
crCSCCRlflORCO
120 E. Gloucester Pike. Barrington,.NJ.08007. 856-546-5500 .
10103
CATALOG NO,
TYPE NO,
FloodPak Series
FPL
JOB NAME
ORDERING INFORMATION
Catalog Number: Example: FPL400MAL ,8
FPL I '
I
SERIES
FPl"
FloodPak
liirge
I WATTAGE I
250,250W
400.400W'
I
I I
I LAMP SOURCE I I VOlTAGE I
MA-Metal Halide 1,120V
(CWA) B-120V,
lX-High Pressure LAMP I 20BV
Sodium l'Lamp 240V,
(CWA) 277V
furnished
*Requires reduced. outer jacketed lamp.
HID units supplied with clear medium base lamp.
ACCESSORIES
FPLKNUCKLE - Adjustable 2" Tenon
Slipfitter,
FPLARM - Shoebox Arm, Converts
FloodPak to pole, mount (minimum 4"
square pole),
FPLSHIELD - Vandal Shield, Helps
protect lens and lamp from breakage.
Clear poJycarbonateshield snaps..in place
over glass lens.
TECHNICAL INFORMATION
14"7/8"
'@
.UL Wet location Usled.
10/03
. I
~ \ ' (} 81m'
,---- ---,~ - ,,~
, - I
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
Sloneo
1.5-3
PRODUCT
SPECIFICATIONS
. The FloodPak is a perfect blend
of architectural 'design and
perfonnance.
. TheFloodPak can be surface
mounted in various positions. Use
it as a cut-off wall pack or tip it up
22:50 for forward throw with
semi-cut-off. Tip It up 450 tor
floodlighting, or turn it over and
use it for indirecVaccent lighting.
. The FloodPak can also be pole
mounted or ground mounted
using mounting ac~essories.
. Precision die cast aluminum
construction. All exposed
hardware is stainless steel.
. Duraplex II dark bronze polyester
. powder finish is standard but the
FloodPak is available in a variety
of designer colors.
. f:lingecl doortrame with clear
tempered gl.?ss lens.
. Multi-faceted reflection system
provides uniform distribution.
. Injection molded triple finger
silicone gasket
,. UL wet location listed for above
or below horizontal aiming.
. Complete with a UL approved
mounting box rated for 900C
supply wire with integral bubble
level.
. Integral heat sink ensures cool
operation.
.- Meets IESNA cut-off requirements.
. Contractor Friendly design with
integral cable permiting easy,
hands free wiring.
crescenlflonco
120 E. Gloucester Pike. Barrington, NJ 08007.856-546-5500
(1"_..._..-
. '
1.5-3
PHOTOMETRies
3MH 251~
!r~~\ .
2MH I I
1MH I ~" I
0 l (/"1 .1
1MH ~~--
2MH I ~ ,/1
~:::rJ I
3MH I '-1 I
3MH 2MH 1MH 0 1MH. 2MH 3MH
, FPL400MAL,8 @ 0'
3MH I Z~I~\'
2MH1
d~-\~\
1MH I,
. I
0 ~~~),I
J
J
~ / (
J I_~~/ J;
I I /1
3MH 2MH 1MH- 0 1MH 2MH 3MH
FPL400MAL,8 @ 45'
MOUNTING OPTIONS
FloodPakSeries FPl
3MH1 . ffi~ II
2MH1 ~:~
1MH1 ~
j l~g3- I
2MH1 ~//-l
3MH! ' ~I~,/ I
3MH 2MH 1MH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH
FPL400MAL.8 @ 22,5'
FOOTCANOLE CORRECTION
Multiply thefollo~ing factors times the .
footcandle values' for changes in
.mounting height. ,
.,
To Change from 20'
NewHght. 15' 20' 25' 30'
Factor 1.78 1.0 .64 .44
LAMP AND WATT CONVERSIONS'
Lamp 250W 250W 400W 400W
MH ' HPS HPS MH
Multiplier .57 .79 1,39 1.0
...,...~
QllDown
22.5' Down
~5' Down
crescenlflonco
(I".-m.-..
120E Gloucester Pike. Barrington, NJ 08007.856-546-5500
O'Up
45'Up
22.5' Up
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
10/03
Geotechnical Investigation
New Shop Building,
Hamilton Construction
2213 South 'F' Street
Springfield, Oregon
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
APPENDIX A - FIGURES ...,..............................................:............................................. 3
PROJECT INFORMATION .........................................c.........,........................................... 1
FIELD EXPLORATION ..............................................,........c............................................. 1
SITE CONDITIONS.............................................................................................,............. 2
Su rface Co nd itions: ,.....,...............,....,....,......, .....,...,:.,................,............ .:....., ..,....... ..." ...... '...". 2
Su bsu rface Cond itions: .....,......,.."...,..."... ,.., ....., ........... ...... ,.....'.....,...... ....,.., ..........,........".......,' 2
Existing Data Review: ..,.....,...,.."......,........,..,.....,....,......,...........,.....,......".."..",........,...,....."....,. 2
SEISMIC DESIG N .............................................................................................................2
DISCUSION OF GEOTECHNICAL ISSUES ..................,.:.,.............................................3
Existi ng Fill: .."......,... ...........,......,................,...., .....,..............."...... ,.....,..... ........,...... ..............,..... 3
F ou ndations: ....'..,..,...".............,...,......."...,.. .....,....',..................,..." .....,..,.., ...........,....,..........",... 3
Build in g Pads:..,......, ...."....,.......,...........,......":...,,...,................, .::......,.....,..,.. ............,....,....,.....,.. 3
Weathe r Cond itions: ..."...."...,.................."................,.."........................:..... ............,...............,.. 4
RECOMMENDA TIONS...........................:.:.........................;.."................,........................4
Materials: ..........."."..,...." .,...,............."...,......"....".... .............,...,:......"...,........, ............,........., ....., 4
Foundation Design. and Construction: ......."...............................~..................................................4
Site Preparation- Building Pads:.,...,...........,........."...................:........,.........",..................",....... 5
LIMITATIONS ,OF THIS REPORT ..................................................................:................. 5
APPENDIX A - FIGURES
.+
PRE.SUBMIITAL REC'O
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
1.'<
Page 1 of 5
June 30, 2008
Geotechnical Investigation
New Shop Building ,
~ '
Hamilton Construction
2213 South 'F' Street
Springfield, Oregon
PROJECT INFORMATION
,Hamilton Construction plans to construct a new shop building at their existing facility
located at 2213 South 'F' Street in Springfield, Oregon, The site location is shown
on the Vicinity Map (Figure 1) included in Appendix A The proposed building area
is currently vacant and used for material storage,
The new development will include.a new single story metal 'frame structure that will
be used for a fabrication shop, We understand that the new structure will be :t6,000
SF in plan area and will, consist of slab,on,grade construction, The structure is
planned to be supported by isolated column footings, . The columns will also be used
to support overhead crane rails that will be incorporated into the new structure, We
anticipate that minimal site grading (cuts and fills of less than :t2 feet) is planned
across the relatively flat site,
FIELD EXPLORATION
The field exploration focused on characterization of the upper soils at the site, We
visited the site on June 18, 2008 to observe surface conditions and conducted limited
subsurface explorations, During our visit we conducted a brief surface reconnaissance
of the proposed development area, Subsurface conditions were investigated by
digging a test pit using a rubber tired backhoe provided by Hamilton Construction, The
test pit was excavated near the center of the proposed building, The approximate
location of the test pit and building are shown on the attached Site Plan (Figure 2,
Appendix A), The test pit was excavated to maximum depth of :tHO feet The soil
profile was logged and representative samples were 'collected from some locations,
Our surface and subsurface observations are summarized in the, following sections,
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'D
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
New Shop'Building
2213 South 'F' Street
Springfield, Oregon
Geotechl)icallnvestigation
Project No, 933-08-02
,
Page 2 of 5
June 30, 2008
SITE CONDITIONS
Surface Conditions:
The site includes relatively level terrain over the entir'e proposed development area,
The ground surface of the storage yard generally consists of crushed aggregate
base, Immediately to the south of the proposed building area there is an access
road and it appears that grades slope downward toward the Mill Race further to the
south,
Subsurface Conditions:
Subsurface conditions were evaluated using the test pit exploration and existing data
from nearby the site, Subsurface conditions observed at the site as part of our field
exploration included fill materials the fulL depth of the' test pit (13 feet), The upper
:1:0,5 feet of the, fill consists of dense sandy gravel:with some silt The gravel is
typically angular 1-inch, minus with some :1:3-inch minus graveL The upper gravel
grades to medium d~nse clayey gravel that is gener~lIy :1:3-inch minus, The day is
highly plastic and moist The clayey gravel extends ,to a depth of :1:2,5 feet Below
2,5 feet we noted soft to medium stiff organic clay, The clay is dark grey, very moist
and has high plasticity, We noted moderate to large organic fragments within the
clay the full depth of the stratum, '
Existina Data Review:
The site is located in south Springfield with alluvial soils anticipated beneath the
development area, We reviewed aerial photographs;;of the site as well as available
geologic mapping and well logs in the area, We understand that the site was
originally developed for a flax seed mill over 50 years ago, Therefore, we anticipate
that grading at the site and surrounding area has been in place for at least this long,
Our review of available well logs in the vicinity of the project suggests that alluvial
sand and gravels underlie the area at depths of :1:5 to 15 feet Based on our data
review, we expect that native alluvial soils that are capable- of supporting the
proposed loads may be present at depths of :1:20 feet Deeper field exploration
would be needed at the site to confirm the actual depth,
SEISMIC DESIGN
The average soil conditions in the upper :1:100"" feet beneath the proposed
development area are expected to include predominately dense sandy gravel and
weathered bedrock, The proposed foundation system will De supported by the
alluvial soils, rather than the upper fill materiaL Ther,!"fore, we believe that use of a
site class D is appropriate for seismic design, Peak ground accelerations and
spectral accelerations (on rock) were determined for,design using 2% probability of
exceedence in 50 years (i.e" :1:2,475 year return interval), The ground motions
provided in OS~C are based on the 1996 USGS mapping, however, the USGS
New Shop Building
2213 South 'F' Street
Springfield, Oregon
PRE SUBMIIT, AL REC'OGeotechnicallnvestigation
- Ui Project No, 933,08,02
JUL 0 '2 zoos
Page 3 of 5
June 30, 2008
updated the maps in 2002 to refleCt improved modeling of the Cascadia Subduction
Zone earthquake, We have used the 2002 USGS modeling as the most current and
accurate information for the site, This modeling considers a variety of seismic
sources including crustal and subduction zone earthquakes, However, the principal
source of the design ground motion is due to a large magnitude (Mw 8,3 to 9,0)
earthquake along the Cascadia Subduction Zone :1:45 miles west of the site, Crustal
earthquakes were also considered, but do not contribute significantly to the design
ground motion, The peak' ground acceleration (PGA) on rock for the site is 0,26g
with a short period spectral acceleration (S5) of 0,649 at 0,2 second period and long
period spectral acceleration (S1) of 0,30g at 1,0 second period, The parameters for
establishing the General Procedure Response Spectrum using OSSC Section 1613
are summarized in Table 1, The values for Sos': and S01 include, a two,thirds
reduction as discussed in Section 1613,5.4.
Table 1. osse 2007 Seismic Des.ign Parameters
Site I
S5 S1 Fa Fv SM~ SM1 Sos S01
Class ,
D 0,64 0,30 1,29 1,80 0,82 0,54 055 0,36
DISCUSION OF GEOTECHNICAL ISSUES
Existino Fill:
'Existing fill present at the site is unsuitable for support of the new structure
foundations, The upper portion of the fill material includes, granular material and
appears to be relatively stable beneath the truck and forklift traffic across the yard,
Based on the depth of the fill material, we believe that it would be most cost effective
to support the new structure on deep foundations that bypass the fill material. Using
this approach it would be possible to 'float' the floor slab over the existing fill
material.
Foundations:
The proposed structure could be supported by a variety of deep foundation types
extending into the underlying alluvium,. We understand that Hamilton Construction
will likely use driven piles or a driven pile tip, with reinforced concrete pier foundation
system for the new structure, We understand that individual column loads of :1:45
kips are anticipated for the new structure, We expectthat driven pipe piles :1:18 to 24
inches in diameter could develop the required capacity with minimal embedment (:1:5
to 10 feet) into the underlying alluvium, .
Buildino Pads:
We have assumed that the building pad will be built up slightly above existing site
grades to assist.in promoting site surface drainage' on the relatively flat site, In
addition, raising the building pad slightly will allow the new slab to be constructed
New Shop Building
2213 South 'F' Street
Springfield, Oregon
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
JUL 0 zZOOS
Geotechl'Jicallnvestigation
Project No, 933,08-02
Page 4 01.5
June 30, 2008
over the existing gr~;lnular fill material without further stabilization of the underlying
organic clay, Therefore, we recommend using a leveling course of :t4 to 6 inches of
compacted aggregate base over the existing granular fill surface to prepare the site
for the new concrete slab,
There is some risk of long term settlement, cracking,and faulting of the slab due to
the underlying organic clay fill material. This risk could be reduced by increasing the
concrete slab thickness and/or increasing the slab reinforcement. We understand
that complete mitigation of the fill material and potential differential settlement is not
desired beneath the slab for the shop building, .,
Weather Conditions:
The site work is not expected to include deep excavations and will generally be
conducted from the existing granular fill which is currently being used as an all-
weather surface, Therefore, we do not anticipate that weather conditions will be a
significant consideration for the proposed site work, .
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on our observations of the soils and our uhderstanding of the proposed
development OGD believes that it will be practical to construct the improvements
using deep foundations to support the new structure, .
Materials:
1, Aggregate base as defined in this report should consist of % or 1-inch minus,
well graded crushed rock, The rock should be relatively clean with less than
5% (by weight) passing the #200 sieve, !:
2, Site fill, as defined in this report, consists of the upper granular fill from'
required excavations at the site, Site fill is not suitable for placement beneath
foundations and slab areas, Therefore, the dse of site fill will be limited to
grading in the areas surrounding the elevated' building pad over the existing
granular fill material during dry weather conditions, '
3, Compact all aggregate base and site fill to 9,5% relative compaction, The
maximum dry density of ASTM 0 698 should be used as the standard for
evaluation of relative compaction, Field density testing should be conducted
on the compacted aggregate base beneath the slab that exceeds :t8 inches in
thickness to confirm adequate compaction prior to placing reinforcing steel or
formwork,
Foundation Desian and Construction:
4, Design all building foundations using deep foundation elements, We have
assumed that the preferred foun9ation alternative will consist of a driven pipe
New Shop Building
2213 South 'F' Street
Springfield, .oregon
Geotechnical.lnvestigation
Project No, 933-08"02
PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'O
JUL Ii 2 ZOOS
Page 5 of 5
June 30, 2008
pile, The pile foundations should be driven, to the required ultimate axial
.capacity using a typical factor of safety. ofi 3:0 using the FHWA Gates
Equation,
5, All piles should be driven to a minimum tip el$vation of 20 feet below grade,
Actual pile depths and evaluation of pile capacity with depth would require
, ,additional deeper geotechnical investigation atithe site, '.,
6. Pile embedment depths and driving resistances should be monitored by the
engineer throug'hout construction,' ,
Site Preoaration- Buildina Pads:
"
7, Elevate the building pad and grade around the perimeter of the structure to
promote surface drainage away from the slab',
8, Compact the existing granular fill surface, Areas of soft material (Le, the test
pit location) should be excavated and replaced with compacted aggregate
base,
9, Proof roll the prepared subgrade beneath the building pad immediately prior
to placement of aggregate base, Any areas of pumping or excessive
deflection should be excavated and replaced with granular fill or scarified,
moisture conditioned and recompacted to provi'de a stable subgrade surface,
10, pface and compact :t4 to 6 inches aggregate base over the approved
subgrade to support the building slabs,
LIMITATIONS OF THIS REPORT
The conclusions and, recommendations contained herein are based on the
assumption that deep foundations will be used to support the new structure and that
the actual depth and consistency of the alluvium underlying the site would be
confirmed at the time of construction, The above recommendations assume that we
will be present during construction to confirm the assymed foundation and subgrade
conditions, We will assume no responsibility or' liability for any engineering
judgment, inspection or testing performed by others,,:
Our work was performed for the exclusive use by Chambers Construction and their
design consultants for the new Hamilton Construction Shop Building project located
at 2213 South 'F' Street in Springfield, Oregon,OGD performed our work in
accordance with generally accepted professional geotechnical engineering practices
in similar locations, Our services do not include any surveyor assessment of
potential contamination or contamination of the soil origround water by hazardous or
toxic substances, No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made,
New Shop Building
2213 South 'F' StreeI
Springfield, Oregon
PRE-SUBMITTAL :REC'O
,.
JUL 0 2 200S
Geotechnical Investigation
Project No, 933-08-02
1-
l
Geotechnical Investigation
New Shop Building
Hamilton Construction,
2213 South 'F' Street
Springfield,OregoI?-
App,encjx A
Figures
.>
OGO Consulting, PC
SelVing Oregon Geotechnical Design and Consulting Needs PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
JUL 0 2 zooa
,
l'
,-
_0
.
Q
11
OGD CONSULTING, PC.
. Serving Oregon Geotechnical Desi91 and Consulting Needs
9027 NW FIR RIDGE PLACE
CORVALLIS, OR 97330
15411 753-0895
VICINITY MAP FIGURE NO,
2213 SOUTH 'F' STREET
NEW SHOP' BUILDING 1
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON, ',iTTJ lo"r'n
" nl'\1" I'IID~1I '..
o ,...,. II\~~~~"':'__
JUL 0 2 200S
Q
OGD CONSULTING, PC.
Serving CKegan Geotechnical Desil}'l CIld Consulting Needs
9027 NW FIR RIDGE PLACE
CORVALLIS, OR 97330
1541) 753,0895
SITE PLAN FIGURE NO
2213 SOUTH,r STREET 2
NEW SHOP BUILDING
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
f\nr- "linn. JUV'f'A I .....F'A "'l
. "".... -, "".... .,." \
, . ~".. ",,""Wit II 1 Inb I\I.\,...,
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
..
L.B.OLSON
& ASSOCIATES
INCORPORATED
Consulting Engineers
Land Surveyors
Urban Planners
380 Q Street
Suite 200
Springfield, Oregon
97477
(541) 302~9790
Fax: (541) 485-3253
Storm Water Design Report
Project:
Date:
Designer:
Type of Project:
Chambers Construction
July I, 2008
Wade R. Holaday, PE
Commercial
Proiect Overview
Construct a 6,000 square foot fabrication shop. The project includes the addition of
6,000 sf of impervious area and the re'grading of the existing grayel around the proposed
building. The runofffrom this area will be directed into the proposed bio,swale prior to
out letting into the existing roadside ditch, A small area (700 sf) between the new and
existing structures will drained into a catch basin with a fossil filter insert.
ProDosed Destination
The drainage from the site will be directed to an existing roadside ditch along the gravel
roadway.
Prooosed Pollution Control Facilities
A bio,swale will be constructed at the southeast corner of the project to yegetatively filter
more than the 50% ofthe new impervious area. The catch basin for the remaining arca
will be a catch basin with a fossil filter insert.
Proiect Site Data
Imperyious Area = 3,000 sf (bio,swale) II 3,000 sf pipe system (new building)
Peryious Area = 19,173 sf (bio,swale) (gravel area)
Water Quality Intensity = 0,19 inches per hour (Rational Method)
Peak Flow Intensity= 1.4 inlhr (2 yT, 10 min,) 2.4 in/hr (25 yr, 10 min.)
Run off Coefficient = 0,90 (Commercial)
Water Ouality Flow Calculations
---
Q = 0.90(0,19) 0.44 = 0,075 cfs
Peak Flow Calculations
Q = 0.90(1.4) 0.44 = 0.55 cfs (2 yr event)
Q = 0,90(2.4) 0.44 =.0.95 cfs (10 yr eyent)
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
,JUL 0 22008
I
,
I
,
Bio SwaleFJow SummarY
Bottom Width,= 1 foot
Channel Slope = 0.25 %
Channel Length = 100 feet
Water Quality flow yelocity = 0.10 fps
Contact Time = 16,67 minutes
Water Quality flow depth = 0:32 feet
"
PRE.SUBMITTAlREC'D
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
"
Worksheet for,Trapezoidal Channel'--1
"
Flow Element
Friction Method: .
Solve For:
Trapezoidal Channel
Manning Formula
Normal Depth
Channel Slope: 0,00250 ftlft
Left Side Slope: 4,00 ftlft (HV)
Right Side Slope: 4,60 ftlft (H:V)
Bottom Width: 1,00 ft
Discharge: 0,08 ft3/s
Flow Area: ft,
Wetted Perimeter: ft
Top Width: 3,57 ft
Critical Depth: 0,05 ft
Critical Slope: 2,60758 ftlft
Velocity: 0,10 ftls
Velocity Head: 0,00 ft
Specific Energy: 0,32 ft
Fraude Number: 0,04
Flow Type: Subcritical
Downstream Depth: 0,00 ft
Length: 0,00 ft
NUlT)ber Of Steps: 0
Profile Description:
Headloss: 0,00 ft
Downstream Velocity: Infinity. ftls
Upstream Velocity: Infinity ftls
Normal Depth: 0,32 ft
Critical Depth: 0,05 ft
Channel Slope: . 0,00250 ftlft
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
JUL 0 2 2008
/
< /'.,
" I / '"
~, "-
,- 1 ~"
\'1 ,
, \/ 'I / :~'" "
/\,' '/. ........ "-
// P l' ',' ,"-
, ;/ // <'-.~~':'--j'''-" ",- /
'--_____.. (",/ ,/~~~'-,- x~r_~_~',~ --"-~/7-
" 'R '---./'. 1\,' L .-'", ."'::--._____ ---- ,
. ~\ :'.f /fv< ------ ~~--]--
--.", __ I I : ':': ,~-:-:--- .""-~---:~.--'-'~'
"r -- C. . . . . :-c-_:_,-._._
',' 'c--- ----- J: . "",."" '." "
~-"~_-=,-=---=--;~-=----=,----=:-:'"7-*: ~-':-~~:':"-C.-~"-,-~~'.:..:--,"~___ " .
--_ " ':'1 "r-------- ~~ -----
---_~~~~~--y.J ~_-:~_ ~-----L__________~-
<-',~'~1 -'-.' ----~--- -.
-~-~---...:...:=~~~-.:J i "'~-----:-,--
"-.,:; , .
-z':'7C""~~CC--~-'3.. L...:_...:'\_:;:,....:-.::;:, ':' , ", -:- ~-,____
-_ ----~- IC---' --CCCC_____
--_ . -r--_ . ----- _ J
---- . j -,--- --
~- ---:.\ ,-~-, ' -----------
SOOl Z 0 lnr
JI~3~ lVlllV\l8nS.3~d
I
I
I
-/"
/
./
;'
.I
/
/
/
/
/
/
;'
/
/
./
/'
/
/
/
;'
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
~
,.
.f
~
~
, ~
I
,
,
/
,
~~
inn e
.1 11.6
r Ii q
I , . .
.'...'e
-.,."
..~ . ~
.
~""-~I'.9'
REVISIONS,
, Ul
X ' ,
-..J8,nrr1 !
Ulr'T'l ;
.,1
I .
:,,=CT~~ ____
;,"'-",.... ,"--
Storm Management Plan
Jor Phase 1 0/
Chambers Construction
",;"'.."
00"'_.
Spri-ngfWld LafW caunty
""9=
"
/
,
I .
\,j)
\
\
o
IF''''' ,,,,' ~
N ~II'"''''
I ~.
'''''',.,!W
---
---'--..:-
--......
r:
~-z
~ .
r
.
:.:?~
s:~,
,,~J.
-===--__"_'''"'' .,,,,.m.,-
.OISOn&,~, .
Morris' ~D
~~.=rr (~l,"nlli;l~
_\WI) im-mO f:ngi",,"r~
'~ .~ll.-:=, & $uiveyo'U
-'''.
O?/71/2008 13:55 FAX 541 736 Lv21
"
CITY OF, SPRINGFIELD PW
- .}lUlUU.s I)
141001
141001/003
Post-if' Fax Note 767'
.T~+\- M6~r\ ':>
CoJDept,
I Dats I #QI -...
.;. pages
IF'c""B\\\'1 (",.r-h~
ICe, '
If'f1ooa'''3.(..,_It)'3'l
I"'"'' "'-1"2:.c...1l::>"2..1
PhO",,'30-z._"l' "to
IFax. 4~-3ZS3.
PhOM: (541) 726.3753, Fax: (541) 736-1021
STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
~-~......_..........~~_.........-.......~-.. (An.'o be/ow (/tis lin{J fil/(JI/ (JIll by Appllcf1Jll) .....,.__~."-~ .."" _.....~.... i
(Ploa".,.runr 10 Mall Slo.dr:r@C:ilyofSpringfi<<ld"ublie Works Ehgi"ee~j"g: Fa:.- # 736./Q2/, Pho"" # 736./0;S), 1
empil: mSlow;iur(ifJd.sprinfd/tdd or. us
Project Name:
AsSeSSDI"S Parcel
Land Users)!
Pr"ject Size (Ac.",,):
Appl"Ox. Impervious Are,,:
1-+.......:14....... t...._..J,....,.:.../...;_ /?u.
j~~.o?: - 0 I _ 00'';=0
\..-1..e-l:hJ\, l....lCv5'1''1U~
(,,,,"/.1'07 ': fO-r SovH.., <!.,,/ ,./ /"'"I'~).
J...-.,..c.."VI.;."',!,!' J9..,...:...... ,.) trOt ~...J../ (~ "''-'') ).
--- ..
Drninagc Proposal (Public connec1:iQn(s), di,charge loeation(.), ere. Armch additJonal sheet(S) Ifne<;.ssary'
'/1... r.o! .....4...- ...: '1 k d"~<J....J ~ ~ ,...df Ii itfr<'j d".;../-') >~_n. . /.
"tt... A-r..A tL:u..'j'
IPro""gen Stormwater Rest ManalJementPraclices:
& t::/~ <;,)...'f ~,II 'I:.c. 1",{J..lf...) ~,';~_,
i~..I+--- ,_~ 0 S4 t..~ '}_..... I ,,~~,~),.
~.., /j,,;.} ~...J -It... "';(1 ~ v-: h-
"
i~
-~._---~ p~r(Nl 'beltJw Ihl.\'Jlnefil{ed...P/" In: tlte,Citr: amI kBfur1Tf/f~ I(}I'J~ A"(llllIltltll
(At a minimum. aJ/.boxes clre.eked by rhl! CI'f ,In (he-front unrJ.haclio/ihMshet:-t ~'h(JlI be su.bhlilled
for an QPfJ!ication.lo be cOn/viele for submit/iII, a/{houph ot.her tetJuil't2menrs mall be fU!Cl!$.rarvJ
1
,
Draiua"c Studv Tvoc(EDSPMScetiOD 4.03021: INote. UH mav be substituted r"r Rational Method\
II Small Site Study - (use Ration.1 Method lbr caloulafions)
o Mid~Level ))evelopiYlont Study - (use Unit HYdrograp~ Mel~od for calculAtions)
, 0 Full Drainage Development Study - (us. Unit Hydrogr'p~ M.mod for calculations)
Environmenta-l Cortsideration~:
1M Wellhead Zone: \0 -Zo"\i""'_.c-r;"."o.. ~~~~,Ii!! !:lillside Development: lV//'(' ,
IiIl WetlandJRiparian: ~\\\'\I-~,,- 1",1. 4-=~ J!jiI Floodway/Floodplain: Iccy....... T'Wel"'--
MSoilType: \\'1.-':'-.,.1.......~C\rb.o,; L~(~~Il:.;.c....IIJOtherJurisdictions 4L- ,
Downstream Analvsis:
IMI N/A
o Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
, 0 Design HOLto USe for starting water surface elevation:
o Manhole/Junction to take analysis to'
Return to Matt Stouder@ City of Springfield, emalh m,~toud"miJci.sorl';ofl"ld.or.ua, F'4)(; (541) 738-1021
,i
PRE.SUBMITTALREC'D
JUL 0 2 ZOOS
051.21/2008 13:56 FAX 541 736 l021
. -~. ...., ...._v ..<.....":'" rl1..l:lo. "'":1:.1. "11.001 "..v.,
CITY,OF SPRINGFIELD PW
UJ...;;)UN &; ~lU.l(t(J.~
14J002
I4J 002l00J
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS
j F'orUfl'ir,;illl US'8~RPc..
.
* Ba.'~d upon thq inf(Jrmo1km pt'm'!ded on rh~ fro"',oflhM. ,fheet. IhrJf()/lawing f't1presanlS a rnlniffmm CfI'what j.~ neecfedfor an
appllc.(2Ji01r f(J be ,romplelefor 3ubmiltClJ with rfZ5pr!Cll0 dra;nCJ~,' hmveve-f'. this Itsl should flf)1 be li24d In lieu qlthl:f Springfil!/d
Devt!/opmenl Cede (SDC) o",h~ CIl)' 's ET/glllt16!ring Desi8n M,:mua{ COjnpUanca With these requlremem., does /UN r:unUilUlC Site
appJ"(wlJl: Addi1imlol Sl'rt"~pecffic Jrrj'ormmion may be required, Not~: Up('m scofjj"g sm:f!I submittal enSlIl'a completf!dfQrm !:c1.,r; tuum
signed il11l1espace provided below:
Interim Design Sbtndnrds!\V~til\r.QU:ality (EDSPM Chapt~t.'5)
~I!q if N/A
~ 0 AU non-building rooftop (NBR) i~pervjoLls surfaces !:l.haJl be PI' ~ .." ......_.;.rl(l!:.g. multj-Qharnbered Calchbasin w!oil tlhratlcn
media') fur ~lOrmwatl!:r qunlity. ~ddl,tibnal1y) a minimum. of50% of tho NBR impervious surface shan bel trealed by
vcgeta"tM m~thods. ~ . '\ .
~ 0 Where required, vegetativo stonlIwatcr desIgn shill I be consi'iC"llt with Imerim design st011d.rds (EDSPM Section 3,02), set
. forth by the Bureau of EnviI'ol'Unenral Servic:l!lli (BES) Dr Clean Wmr S~rvices (CWS).
II 0 For new NBR impeN{OUSarea less than 15~OOO square feel. Il. simplifi~d,design ap"roach may be followed as specif1e:d by
the BES for vegetative! treatment.. '- .
~ 0 If a srormwater Ireatment sw~Je is propoSl!d1 submit calc\.lIQtions/spec;itl~,mion$for sizing~ 'Velocfty. tlow, side slopes, bottom'
~lope,and seed llllx consistent wi1h either BBS (Jr CWS mqutrcments.
~ 0 Waler Quality calcuIatiom OS required In Seolion 3,03,1 of the EDSPM'
III 0 AUbuHding rooftop mounted equipmenr,-or othel' fluid containing equip'rnent located Outside ofthebuiJding, shall
be.provided with sec:ondQ.ry corrrainrnBl1t aT weather telswtant emcIQsur~_ .
Genem! Slud~ Rcqu,remont. (EDSPM Seellon 4,03) "
III 0 Dr3in~ge studyprcpafed by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed In the state ct"Oregon.
o !Iii! A complete drointlge study, as "'quired in EDSPM Section 4.03, J, including a hydrologiCll! study map,
i!iJ 0 CRlculations shDwillS system capacIty for a 2-year STOrm e'Vel'l~ iind oV;rflow t:ffects ofa.25-yeat' Storm event
o M The time ofooncentl'1l!lon (Tel shall be: dt~ermined using a 10 minut<::'stmt time "or developed b3sil1~.
Review or Downstream System (EDSPM Section 4-OJ,4,C)
o II A downstream drainage'analysis as described in E:DSPM Section 4.03A.G. On-sire drainage shall be gov~rned by the
Oregon Phunbi"g Sp..ialty Code (OPSC), '
o . Elevo.dons of the HOt and ih~w lines for both city and private systcmswhere applicable.
Design of Storm' Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04) - ',' .
m 0 Flow lin~s! slopes. rim eleva.tions, pipe type and sizes, clearJy Jn~ir,;ated on::,thc pJan'set.
o iii MinImum Ripe cover ~h:d' ~e 18 jnd1e:.s for n:intoreed Dlpe ~Ild 36 inchos for plain (Ioncrote and .,1:i1stic: pipe matona!s, Or
proper engineering calculations ih,"l1l1 be provided when less_ The cover shaH be sufficient to support an 80)000 Ib load
without fuilure oflhe pipe structurE:, ,
o !Ifj Manning',,: I'n" values for pipt:s shaH be consistcllt with Table 4-J oftheEDSr: All stann pipcsshaJl be desig'ned to
llchit:"':c a minimum -.Jelocity'ofthree ~3) feet per second at 0.5 pipe'full b~cd on Tu.ble 4-1 ~ well.
Other/Mlsc: , .
IiI 0 Existing Ilnd proposcd. contours. located at one foot i~t!:IVal. Include spot,elevatlons and site gradeS showi!1g how site
drains ,]
11 0 PriVi!lt~ !itoI'tnwstereasemenrs !\hall be clearly d(lpioted on plans when pri~afIH;tormwator flowS from one l>roperty to
anQthel" '
o III Dryw~lIa shan nQ{..receivfll'llnoff' from any surl"e.ee w/o being treated by on.~ or'more BMPs., with the'excePtion of residcntiitl
. building roof!; (EDSP Section 3.03A,A), Additional provisions apply to lhi$ as requir~d b)"thc:: DEQ. Refer to the welb.site:
\l,'w"~'.de_Q8tat[' j)r_Il~/\'vrl/Qmlllldw~/llichml1e.hcjlJ for mare informatipn. .
o ~l)etentiQn ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre--development ~ateB for 1Jie 2 tluough'25-ytar $torl11 events
"'Tliisform sh.all k lndudl1d as Iln fJ!ttIclnnem, inside th~front ,'vvlir. (JftlJe :iCormwaMr ,'IUdy
,; IlvIPOR7'ANn ervGIN/::ER PlEASe ll/"ID lJEl,OW {I D 51 'N!
I A~ the engil1eerofr'ecord,1 hereby certifY the above required ItMls ilUe , 1 11.-IO~
complete: and included with the submit;:ed stormw:a.ter s:udy ~d plan set Signature" Date; J
f'So-k-R~.",'i IS (''''~J';rc.J s.-.:W.~ l'o"'lVerslon2: M",en:lOQ4,. ',- _ \'1....1._ I, \
(.J " ~ b~ ~c.e.::>:lQ"'l .\.. ~~~ ...,.......'~u.. \'1~~"f".
. ~S;:-. ~~~ \~ dt'i.<.I..a.<,o..~ tR95l~.-j.... ~e..<i;~~<l>\.~~)ChS~"':-JD
?-~,..A::~",~.\s """"'"' 1t.<-('c.1:...:~. ",., . Kr: JUDIVUIlru: 1\.."
JUL 0 2 ZOOS