HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 8/27/2008
City bf Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Site Plan Review
f, Date Received. "~
~), AUG 2 7 2008 ':2
Original Submittl"l
. ..
I Major Site Plan Modification Pre-Submittal:
IMa'or Site Plan Modification Submittal:
L', I 'I" "",',
. , ,
Site Plan Review Pre-Submittal: 0
ISite Plan Review Submittal: [gJ
'U~-. ", "I" , "
:{;.JI -... ~
."
Applicant Name: Hamilton Construction Co.
Icompany:
IAddress:
IAPPlicant's Rep.: Scott Morris
Icompany:
IAddress:
,
I Property Owner: Same as Applicant
Icompany:
IAddress:
,
IASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-03-01-00
I Property Address: 2213 South F Street
ISize of Property: 18.21 Total - Approx. 0.5 dev. area Acres [gJ Sauare Feet 0
jproposed Name of Proiect: Hamilton Construction Fabrication Shop
,
I Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: Construct new 6000 square foot fabrication buildinq with associated utilities
I Existing Use: Industrial uses related to bridqeconstruction company
INew Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): 7285
!Siqnatures: PI~ase siqn and print your name and date in the a riate box on the next
Phone: (541) 746-2426
Fax:
P.O. Box 659, Sprinqfield, OR 97477
Phone:
(541) 302-9790
(541) 485-3253
Olson & Morris
Fax:
380 Q Street, Ste 200
Sprinqfield, OR 97477
Phone:
Fax:
,
ITAX LOT NO{S): 300
., .
-. . . .
. , - -.
Associated Applications: Siqns:
Pre-Sub Case No.: rRE.2c08-cx:olfg, I Date: 11 '?:-rl Oz:, Reviewed by:
Icase No::l)1LC1DO~ -((j{)/p 0 I Date: ~/l~ /0 ~ I Reviewed 6v7"A('f;U~
I - . "I'" '. I lb~
ADDlication Fee: $ ~L...1..'l.C1) Technical Fee: $ Rt \ \ . 1 0 Postaqe Fee: $
ITOTAL FEES: $ Ji-. 6q3. 10 _" J ~ROJ'~~! NUMB,ER: PW 1r1)~ -(YPtZ I
I -'.,~~+..",;,,~;~:~ ',B'-+.~-.;: '<,,(L~~J ''l:~;.w';;,-fro, ,-~~"''''-','f~''''~;"" ..c~,..;.,.,,_ _,-" 'OF -. '. -' -"",,,"_ ""'1
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
1 of 10
Owner Signatures
This application form is used for both the required pre-submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
Pre-Submittal
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the
J~ IAA. e r. f2.s(
Print f
Date:
-1~~P~~s.
'Submittal .
Owner:
I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with-the completeness check
performed on this application at the'pre-Submittal Meeting, Laffirrn the'information identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided jf not otherwise
contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the a'pplication.with the information ,as submitted.
This statement serves as ~ritten notice pursuant to the requirements of,ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete .
application. .. ,
~pj(~
"Si nature ,- /
~Q lAJ. .p~ rig '->
Print !
Date:
8 -z..~-OfS
-i~~
~~~
". Date Received:
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submittal
Revised ,1/1/08 Molly Markarian
2 of 10
~
tJ~
N~
,~
%
~
~(
~.
o
o
SitE! Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist
Date Reeelved: ~
l~:t;';'~~
AUG 27 2008 }~!
NOTE: ,
. ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BO~H Pre-subm~~i1~md'~AAWLdi.
. If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to 'your specific application, please
state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form.
Application Fee - refer to.the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department, Any applicable application, technology, ~nd postage fees are collected at the
pre"submittal and submittal stages,
Site Plan Review Application Form
Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional information that may haVe 'a bearing in determining the
action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees
and future expansion plans, if known, I
Copy of the Deed
Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within th!= past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances, "
Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 8'h"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the
required neighboring property notification packet.
Right-of-Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage
on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed
Storm water Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations and
documentation must be consistent with the Engin'eering Design Standards and Procedures
Manual.' ,
Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prel?ared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4,2-105 AA, Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's .
transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain, how the traffic from a given
development affects the transportation system in tern-is of safety; traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS mus~ also
address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives. "
Seven (7) Copies of'the Following Plan Sets for i~re-Submittal OR
Eighteen (18) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal
;gr All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and
sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data', north arrow, and date of
preparation.
l2? All plan sets must be folded to 8V2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands.
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
~ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer
I
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
4 of 10
jgT Vicinity Map
I
~ The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb
cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what
is being removed. For existing structures to remai[l, also indicate present use, size,
setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings.
~ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse
Map on file in the Development Services Department
fgJ The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment
or Letter of Map Revision
0: The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department
~ Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when
measured 4 112 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian
areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings
~ Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey Ofd,
Lane County. "A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must btPSU~IVe .
concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable elf'
soils and/or a high water table ., AUG 27 2008
b. Site Plan" . " " Original Submittal
j2Sf Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect; or Engineer
JXJ Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the
parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and
distance between buildings
~ Location and height of existing or propos~d fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage,
trash receptacles, and signs "
i;Z Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and disabled parking spaces;
including aisles, wheel bumpers, dir~ctional signs, and striping
I)(f Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site
proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vet;Jicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and
other impervious surfaces
~ Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district
~ On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation
~. Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and
dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed
~ Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces
(ZI Location of existing and proposed transit facilities
]ZJ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses
~ Phased Development Plan - where applicable, the'Site Plan application must include a
phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries
and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street
connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
5 of 10
required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater
management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply
to the Site Plan application being submitted.
c. Improvement and Public Utilities Plan
)zr Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
~ Location and width of all existing and proposed easements
~ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and'names of all existing and proposed
streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed
development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable.
~ Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting'
p<l, Location of existing and required traffic control del(ices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities
I)<t Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks,
sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails
~ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities,on and adjacent to the site including
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas,
telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points
d. Grading, Paving, & Stormwater Management Plan
JZl Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
gJ Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are
proposed as part of the stormwater management system
~ Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
ps:l Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
~ The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but
not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater
quality measures; and- natural drainageways to be"retained
~ Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for
land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals)
~ Amount of proposed cut and fill
e. Landscape Plan
JgJ Drawn by ~ Landscape Architect
1)Q Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of
landscape coverage -
1Zl,Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110
D?l Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system
~Location and type of street trees
~List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground
cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common namt>i~~~~cej~cf.pacing,
and method of planting
f. Architectural Plans
AUG 2 7 2008
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
Original Submittal
6 of 10
, , ~ "
D
)ZJ Exterior elevations (J, all bu(ldings and structures proposed for the development site,
including height _
~ Conceptual floor plans
g. On-Site Lighting Plan
~ Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing
and attached _
Qq Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination,
wattage, and luminous area
-gPhotometric test report for each light source
Additional Materials That Maybe Required
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS
DISCUSSED IN SDC 5:1-120:
~/~
~iOO-
~
D
tJ~
tJp
tJ !(iiJ
D
D
D
Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials to
demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240
Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of
bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the
top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present
Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional
standards of the overlay district
If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified
in SDC 5.19-100
A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property
Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence
the permit application has been submitted for review
Where any 9rading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land
and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development
Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or "variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100
and 5.21-100
An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is
proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can
be served by sanitary sewer
Date Received:
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submittal
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
7 of 10
o
:::!,
(Q
::r
!!!.
CJ)
c:
tT
3
~
:1>-
,-
15
l~
,..,
C
m
CD
:::0
CD
o
CD
<'
CD
R-
/
/"
-7'
/
/'
, -
/'" "
, ----
'...'
~~.....- _,ol-:;::;
/
/
/
/
/
/
~
~
/
/
/
/
/~
09"
'00,3
=>
=>
':x>
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
,........",
'~I
~.
IIi
,II
"........
,
\
/
,
,
I
tv'
I
I
I
I
I
/
/
I
I
r
---- ,
/ ,
--. I I
:qq~ "I II I I[li . .....,....,.
..~IIIl" ~
n I! I~ iB,S! !I. I' . ,
i I I I Q
.' 56: 0" + + ,,"0 €l 0 . .. j I I I I ;Jiill.!
. . I !i "I
" . nnlnnlqll: . .,l' i !
" 1 "fl': -Z-r-
I Iii Iii I ! ; i . ! i I . ! I!~~ ' ~
i ,n ii, ; J "1I'11J I!l
, I H I' .
-~---~_...----l REVISIONS
en -
J: .
--lg,~[11
['1
--I
....("'-~'"~~
Site Development Plan'
far Phase I of
Hamilton Construction
SpringJULd. ,La.nr CClUnlll aregon
~
~i~'
""~LL....~ ,"--
I
"<~,,",p.,
R'H""O",
Olson &
Morris
*QSI.lU'IIlIlI
~OI.'Hn
~(>.4,)""-t...
'Al:(>.4'I_;mj
.,
> ,
,
OILSON &
MloRRllS
A division of
L.B. Olson & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
Land Surveyors
Urban Planners
380 Q Street
Suite 200
Springfield, Oregon 97477
(541) 302-9790
Fax: (541) 485-3253
olsonandmorris,com
Hamilton Construction Project
New 6000 Square Foot Fabrication Shop
Owner
Hamilton Construction Inc,
Attn: Robert Hirte
P.O. Box 659
Springfield, OR 97477
Aoolicants Reoresentative
Olson & Morris
Altn: Scott Morris, PE
380 Q Street, Ste 200
Springfield, OR 97477
Architect
Nagao Pacific Architecture
Attn: Rodd Hansen
1680 Pearl Street
Eugene, OR 97401
Date Received:
Contractor
Chambers Construction LLC
Attn: Dave Hoffman
3028 Judkins Road, #1
Eugene, OR 97403
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submittal
Proiect Overview
Hamilton Construction, Inc, is a construction company that specializes in bridge and
railway construction. They have been located at 2213 South T' Street in Springfield
since 1953, with the site being approximately 18,2 acres in size, They are a large
employer with more than 100 employees (most in the field), with about 25 employees at
the South' F' Street site, Due to the complexity of their projects, much of the parts for
bridge and railway construction are pre-fabricated at this location and delivered to their
various job sites.
The current site is gravel due to the industrial nature of the operation (paving would be
hard to maintain). The existing conditions plan shows that the majority of the property is
being used for material storage, with the western buildings on the site being used as
office and pre-fabrication.
The current fabrication process involves the (2) most western buildings and the westem portion
of the office building. This proposal is to construct a new 6000 square foot fabrication building
which will consolidate to operation.
As shown on the site plan, the new building will be southeast of the existing fabrication building,
connected with a new concrete ramp. This will eliminate the current internal traffic pattem for
forklifts and utility vehicles driving through the yard to other buildings. This will provide (3)
benefits to the operation:
I, Internal fabrication operation will be more efficien't.
2, Reducing utility vehicle travel through the yard is safer.
3, Reducing utility travel on the gravel surface will improve air quality,
Upon completion of this new fabrication building, Hamilton Construction, Inc. is proposing to
remove the e~isting secure storage building (shown as phase 2 on the site plan).
Phasin12
This site was originally built out over many years in a pattern that is not conducive to their
current operation, Hamilton Construction, Inc, is planning to alter the site layout of buildings in
the coming years to better utilize the'site, However, the plan for the entire site has not been
determined,
The site plan shows two other items as future phases. Phase one is the new fabrication building
with associated utilities. Phase two would be the removal of the current secure storage building
after the fabrication shop is complete, Phase three would most likely be removing the existing
fabrication office and saw shop with the intent of eventually replacing it with their main
headquarters office building. Since that will most likely be a longer time frame than 3 years, it
was not included in this site review application,
Traffic Circulation & Parkin!!
Since this is a heavy industrial construction operation, the site is not open to visitors or even
clients without c~ecking itito the office, Therefore, the main parking area is at the north of the
property on the north side of the existing office, There are (3) other areas within the yard
designated for employee parking, but they currently are gravel.
There is no need for visitors to the site to be in the new fabrication'shop, Therefore, we are not
proposing a paved road or pedestrian way from the office to this new building, There are
currently about 25 employees who are at the site during the day, and there is currently adequate
area in front of the office and within the yard for parking,
Utilities
Date Received:
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submittal
"
Most utilities are already available to other buildings within the site as discussed below:
Sanitary Sewer
The sanitary sewer will be tied into the existing 6" line that serves the fabrication office, The
elevation of the existing line is not known at this time. However, the Contractor will pot hole the
existing line prior to construction to determine if this line can be extended to the new fabrication
shop with a gravity feed, If the line is currently too shallow for a gravity extension, then the
proposal is to add a small sanitary pump in the new fabrication building to serve the (2) sinks and
toilet.
Water
The domestic water for the new building is proposed to tie into the existing service to the
existing fabrication shop building to the northwest. The ,water demand for this new building is
proposed to be minimal. Since wc will be extending a fire line to the vicinity of the new
building, we propose to put an additional 1,5 inch water pipe in the trench, capped at both ends,
for potential future use.
The existing site does not have tire protection for the buildings set back from the street.
Therefore, we are proposing to install a new 12" water line (fire) with a double check and meter
west of the existing office on South' F' Street.. We then propose to install a 12" line through the
site and install (2) fire hydrants as shown on the utility plan. The location of these hydrants was
generally agreed to by Gilbert Gordon of the Fire Department prior to placement on the plan.
This line can then be used for other future buildings on the site if additional hydrants become
necessary,
Electric
There is existing overhead power to the fabrication building that is fed from a transformer at the
southwest corner of the property, The proposal is to keep the existing overhead power along the
south linc and upsize the existing transformer. The proposal then is to install a new electric
panel in the existing fabrication shop and a new electric panel in the proposed building, This
design is being completed by Christensen Electric,
Phone / Cable / Natural Gas
It is not proposed to extend phone, cable, or natural gas facilities to the new building at this
time,
Storm Drainage
The existing storm drainage system on the site is collected in a series of area drains the feed into
an existi~g ditch that runs parallel to the south property line, This ditch theo~ur~ ~~eived:
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submittal
.
,-
northwest, and eventually feeds into the mill race, The proposed drainage system is shown on'
the stom1 drainage plan and the associated report in this submittal.
'.
The proposal will be to install a new bio~swale on the south side of the new building to collect
run off from the new concrete areas and adjac~nt gravel. Thebio~swale then is routed to the
northwest and an area drain will divert the water'into the same ditch that is currently being
utilized, The bio-swale lets us detain a portion of the flow, to insure that a zero net increase in
peak flow is achieved,' .
See the associated materials submitted for a more detailed discussiowand .calculations for the
system,
Landscane
Since the majority of this large site is not being re-developed at this time, we have defined the
area around the new.building as the "development area", 'The site is also zoned heavy industrial,
and is surrounded by property with the same zoning. Therefore, our proposal is to not have a
formal landscape setback for the new building, We are proposing that the bio-swale (planted)
will act as a landscape buffer for adjacent properties,
."
Lighting
Site lighting in the development area will be provided by wall' packs, which are shown on the
building elevations and associated applicationsubmittals,
Drinking Water Protection'
"
Representatives from the City of Springfield, Springfield Utility Board, and Hamilton
Construction have. met on site.to discuss the requirements for,this drinking water protection
application. Hamilton Construction staff are currently working on the mitigation planas
discussed at the meeting, The drinking water protection application will be turned in subsequent
to this site review application,
Rinarian Setback
The Springfield Development Code requires a 50 foot riparian, setback from the top of bank
along the millrace forall buildings. Olson & Morris provided additional field surveying to show
that the top of bank on the south side of the mill race is significantly lower than the north side,
Therefore, the elevation of the top of bank on the south side c'hn be used to define the top of bank
on the north side (definition of top of bank being the elevation that water will overflow onto .
adjacent upland), .
The plans show this elevation on the south bank, then projected onto the north side of the mill
race. We have then shown that the riparian zone is protected and the propos"i~~~e6eived'
setback more than 50 feet from the Mill Race top of bank. . .
. AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submltti'1
I, .t?/
. \.r ~vi~; /0
.J yY" /'
F'
AUG 27;gp08
','.:"~
inal Submitt~;
. . ,,';k'!
'. '.:'.~::'j
<,~i;~
I.'
I
!!II.
II
L
L
,".,'."
'<"j, nl~,:lJl
t\('( j- :~ -:.'::':0.:",
t,'h\i'.lo.I'f'.'kv
l;) ]~ re,. :<;L',,\
HARRY 1. HAHILTON and W'!LLIAH T. PECKHA'M, formerly doing
business as HAM7LTON & TfiOMS, a partnership consisting of Harry T.
H8!fl;l.-1t.;.on and 'i'lil!iain.T. Peckh<UJ1, hereinafter called grantors, convey
to'11AMILTON CONSTROC'l'ION CO.' (OREGON),' an Oregon corporation).1 a 11 thilt
cea~;op.<operty ,ituated in Lane County. 'State of Oregon, de'cribed as,
Beginning at a point on.theSouthetlY right of way
line of the Southern Pacific Railroad 121B.66.feet
East and 510.26 feet North of the l':"e-entrant angle.
of the Isaac Brigqs Donation Land Claim No. 39, in
Township 18 South, Range 3 West, W~llamette Meridian,
{~aid point of b~9inning ~Qi~g by: record 100.0 feet
:.cutha:::ly at rig;}\: angles to Engineer's centerline
station 46!J + 78,.0 of s-aid Railroad) and runninq
thence South OG 01' East 287.7 fQet~ thence South
SSG 51' East 86.7 feet; thence South 410 26' East
609.9 feet;' thence South 48" 34' Eas-t 138.10 feet;
thence South 64" 11,' East 126.8 fCE:lt; thence South
7DG 37' east 429.29. feet; thence North 00 Ol' West
975_24 feet to the Southerly right of way line of
said railroads. thence ~orth 840 27,rWest along the
'Southerly right of way line of said; Railroad 1102.0
feet to the place of beginning in Lane County, Oregon.
o SUbject to zoning ordinances, rese~a~iOriS .in ''/
federal patents, eas~~ents, and restrictions and
re5~~vations of ~eco~d.
8822341
WARRANTY DEED
.';-i\i
and covenant.that'grantors a~e the owners of the above described property
free from alL" encumbrances " and will warrant .::m'd defend the same aqainst
all persons whornay.lawfully claim tile same, except.as shown above.
..-....;_t
..,::::;.fl
<-i'~
.. ~~".)
,0-::1
.)'J
Ii
The true and actual consideration for this transfe~ is
,$15~;,OOO.OO .
....;1
.;.'l~
. Until. a change is requ(!sted, all tax sta.tements shall be sent
to -the ,fOllowing address:
".;
S79lAllDl 06/01/SaCASC
p.O. 30x 658 . nann"
. Springfiqld, or~gDn 97477 06107 aa "n
I ~ 5791AOOl , I < PFr:
/. f!.t, . (,"1"1'"(' 1I1G008n
((J day of ~t, 1975. /2
- JI...,lL! ) ':!L,:::crt-:...
H~rY/IfjHamil~ K!
WU:.:"-e~.-t.-r'~',---7 \.... ,'~ ./ €~
William.T. Pe~kham
;.~n
:::;-:_i
.':.i
,.,"",
,~~:::;,:,:: Dated thi,
'J": \\I,)I"R,' :. '.
: "l~'~\\' ;~..
:.. '-S~~~E at. OREGON
r\ ,?oun~\.'<~(r.,ane 55;
.......~i:..\::.:..:.~.~ersonallY appeared the. above-namcd HanyI. Hamilton and William
'.i-:"'Peckham, .Jncl acknowledged the forcgoil}9_,..,instru.llcnt to he their voluntary
act. Before "me:. . y'// . .:-:.} 1
*~;~~~~,'"JL,' 1975: (C~..;\~"j r/tI--tJ.-c----;
Notary Public ,IEor Oregon .
!-:y commisSion (:Expires,'.r:~ -.77
) i1
,
.';,:
...~_:.,
.-';':
...":
"f.
.~: .
....^
i,..",..
~.I :.
;,;""..
iJ,..
:t;',..
,,'
, .....
~-:=;.-~~=-.:~ 0..
. . . ." ..". ' .... ..., ~ .,
'~;~~J:",'J';,!.'i~)'~;~,i",,~~::; .........,..
'$:';;';'~(!';'!:;;~t;iihit;;1~e'~~~J-~Y:'i;'1+./
,::.~:y,~ :-':'!rf,<","
.:;' ;..:..f :;,,-:'!.
I
,:.".'"
r'~~~. . ......
-'..i.,- .
....'......... . .
,:t-,. -.
>....~... ..
.."C'-..,-, -.
::'.c.,' ,
.,:..'~' .
5.Da
t"""'" .
::0:;/'.
':<.'."'..'
'.'<-"';..
~;@~~.-..:-.:.-.
tOC"
,.".
fi.:.'-"
\:;.:.
rf/,
10.00.
<!(:>":-
.:}~,:
..,o~.; .
i';j
!........
I
ri'~'
(:;'~.''-
['
J
I ~ .
!,-
f-.:.
;
I
i
i
f
i .
I
.. .~' '.
._~I->
';j~'::,",:.
.;.~':'-' ..
:>,;",,-..
'>,\'..
;':l:.:."
:~;~,,:'
~'>:;"."..':
" ,.
.:...".....
.';
,~'..' ..' ,\
..J
I
,
....
III
:/Ii
"2
:. ;l
'..,'.
"i;,".
"';' I
,:."
.......;;;:;
. ."~.::
'.' ~ .
i.'
..,--,
",'1"-' I
-:".~
~:,:;" ...., t
__' "-"". ""1
t<::y.;:. :;":;
r
~ i~;~:;l;
I.."';"','"
;,'
~~if~ii'
f'._....-~-._._,.._-"..J
.;iJ
'fi~:;; :::,is~~
'f,,:.~,1
~~~I
i ,~"'.' . \, ..:. .,: .l.~.i'
;;'::~~~~:' .
",,!'j";
<1-";,'"..-
~' ,
.. II.
.,..""",~.
,'.,"
....:.(:.
L
, ,
.; '. k: ;l ~'~~.~f~;.~'t-:\rr~ ~}f~_~:::ti;JL '~:?:~i:~~~:~~~1.:r:~~;~~~j~ ~~ ~~':;:.';f'. ..:,': .
.. ''';'i'',:~~-~'-''i':k';0,~-q.f1'!f:i,t'~i-f;.'X' }ti;'~I' :;:;~
,~;f"'i-ffl.....'.n"" . ~.;;::;~~~.,:...,;~m,..;-,' i
,,;1.-~ l:.:;;: \-Of.;l:.':I)'.'1:I;;J~'l,""
*
;t\
1
i~
f~
-=<"-<"
00
;;3
o
>
"
~
~
~s~
2 ~ "
'~n
19.~
~ "...:<
~~Q
;1;..... ~
19~
..."'~
-'" "
....
~ f~
""""
a".
i'l. ~,t
,<
,.
n~
~!r
0"
'"
,~
t'~
"
.."
.... ~
(J1 m
.... ..
...... ,~
:n ;;
;-
,-.
.:.:'
Date Received:
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Sub,mittal
I
-.\
tlI,r.;:ZElEl
_",I I ,., I.. .H.... .. "-... I. 1,.0,'"
1
..1
::.1~;~
:,t ~> .
'".,'1
-i',\'::
':'.\'
',:1. ~!.~":'
~:I :.:k"
',',",
;,~;.
ti ~~:.
!',,'.
r.~; ,
,'....,
~
'"
""
.p,
~'i.:..
;~L
~ .-': , .
:';',~.,.
~:::'.: .
~",.--
'.'"
~,:.:'.
~l~r '
i:f;:. .
~'.;:...,
[i~
~~L~:
~-;r-:?
I
:;.~~,: .
~~:'.::
'I
JI
,.....,.
r~r
~".< .
(.:~:
::.1
'.m;
II
Di
II
J
~
-..J
..11.1 "..ILI.....<I........ ""l..I.
~, h.
i
i
,
i
,
,
I
,
i
i
i
I
,
I
i
I
.
.'
1651 CENTENNIAL BLVD,,' SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
P,O, BOX 931 . SPRINGFIELD,OR97477
PHONE: 541.741.19Bl
FAX: 541.741.0619
4
La;",.
~
~.'.'\A",
~
~'_"'i.,
,~ .....,.,..,
-:"__ ,..-.,1/1':" f\
~x~rg{!:~n
TITLE INSURANCE SERVICES' ESCROW CLOSINGS
875 COUNTRY CLUB RD. . EUGENE, OR 97401
P,O. BOX 10211 . EUGENE, OR 97440
PHONE: 541.687.9794
FAX: 541.6B7.0924
August 26, 2008
Our Order No,: ELT,55804
SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT
Olson & Morris
380 "Q" Street Ste 200
Springfieid, Oregon 97477
Attn: Larry Olson
Estimated Premium for:
PARTIAL BILLING
$200.00
TOTAL
$200.00
Dear Larry:
We are prepared to issue on request and on recording of the appropriate documents, a policy or
policies as applied for, with coverages as indicated, based on this preliminary report.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A
Showing fee simple title as of August 19,2008, at 8:00 a,m" vested in:
HAMILTON CONSTRUCTION CO. (OREGON),
an Oregon corporation
Subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms, conditions and exceptions
contained in the policy form, No liability is assumed until a full premiwn has been paid,
Date Received:
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submittal
CONTINUED
"IN OUR BUSINESS. YOU MATTER MOST"
\vvvw.evergreenlil n dtitle .com
EL T -55804
, Page 2
SCHEDULE B
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS
. 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing
authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or 8'y the public records; proceedings
by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings,
whether or not shown by. the records of such agency'or by the:public records.
2, Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by th6 public records but which could
be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by 'making inquiry of persons in possession .
thereof. "
3, Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the public"records; reservations or
exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to
water.
4, Any encroachment (of existing improvements located on the ~ubject land onto adjoining
land or of existing improvements located on adjoining land onto the subject land),
encwnbrance, violation;variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the title that would be
disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey ofthe.subject land,
5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, material, equipment rental or workers,
compensation heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not'shown by the public
records, ,
CURRENT EXCEPTIONS
6, 2008-2009 TaXes, a lien not yet due or payable.
. 7, Rights of the public and of governmental bodies in and to thatportiOli of that portion of the
premises herein described'lying below the high water mark of Mill Race and the ownership of
the State of Oregon in and to that portion lying below the high water mark thereof.
8,Any adverse claim based upon the assertion that the location' of Mill Race has moved and
that any portion of the subject property has been created by artificial means or has accreted to
such portions so created, or based on the provisions ofORS 274,905 through 274.940.
." ~..
9. Reservation as contained inDeed Recorded May 27, ]936, Book 186, Page 249, Reception
No, 42663, Lane County Oregon Records, '
10, Right-of-Way Easement, grimied to Pacifi<: Power & Light Company, a corporation, .
including the terms and provisions thereof, by instrument Recorded March 30, ] 965, Reception
No, 97387, Lane County Oregon Records,
Date Received:
CONTINUED
AUG 2 72008
Original Submittal
EL T - 5580.4
.Page 3 ..
II. . Grant of Easement, granted to the City of Springfield, in9luding the tenns and provisions
thereof, by instrument.Recorded March 18, 1964, Reception No. 490.10., Lane County Oregon
Records.
12. Declaration ofPri,::ate Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, by instrument
Recorded February 27, 1998, Reception No. 98-140.19" Lane County Oregon Records,
, .
13. Improvement Agreement with the City of Springfield, including the terms and provisions
thereof, by instrument Recorded'August 21,1998, Reception No. 98-66754, Lane County
Oregon Records, .
,
14, Deed of Trust, including theierms and provisions thereof; executed by Hamilton
Construction Co, '(Oregon)"an Oregon corporation, as Grantor(s), to Cascade Title Co" as
Trustee, for the benefit of ACC, Inc., an Oregon corporation, as Beneficiary, Dated August 7,
20.02, Recorded August 7, 200.2, Reception No, 20o.2-o.5984o.,',Official Rccords of Lane
County, Oregon, given to secure payment of a Note for $1,21 Q,825,Oo..
,
NOTE: Taxes, Map No, 18,0.3,0.1-00-00300., Code 19,00, Ac~ount No, 0.5780.0.3, 20.0.7-20.0.8,
$8,30.7.42, paid in full. .
,'.
"
NOTE: The address of the property to be insured herein is: 2213 SOUTH "F" STREET,
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON.9747~.
NOTE: A JU13GEMENTILIENIBANKRUPTCY SEARCH was done for the name(s)
HAMILTON CONSTRUCTION CO, (OREGON), and as of August 19,2008, none were
found, ' ,
NOTE: As of August 19,20.08, there are no liens for the,City 6fSpringfield.
INFORMATIONAL NOTE: The current vesting deed and all.changes back to the deed which
vests ownership 24 months ago are as follows: . -- .
WARRANTY DEED RECORDED June 7,1988, FROM HARRY I. HAMILTON AND
WILLIAM T, PECKHAM, FORMERLY DOING BUSINESS AS HAMIL TON & THOMS, A
PARTNERSHIP CONSISTING OF HARRY I. HAMILTON A,ND WILLIAM T, PECKHAM
,
TO HAMILTON CONSTRUCTION CO. (OREGON), AN OREGON CORPORATION,
RECEPTION NO. 88,22344.
Date Received:
CONTINUED.
AUG27 2008
Original Submittal
ELT - 55804
Page 4
NOTE: SUPPLEMENTED TO UPDATE REPORT,
Very truly yours,
EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY
HOME OFFICE
By fl4ltJJ
Jeffrey K, Walker
Advisory Title Officer
NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREUNDER UNTIL POLICY IS ISSUED AND
PREMIUM PAID. IF FOR ANY REASON THE REPORT IS CANCELLED, A MINIMUM
CANCELLATION FEE OF $200,00 WILL BE CHARGED,
Date Received:
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submittal
'.
ELT - 55804
Page 1 of 1
Legal Description
<. .
EXHIBIT A
Begirming at a point on the Southerly right~of,way line ofthe'Southem Pacific Railroad
1218.66 feet East and 570.26 feet North of the re-entrant angle of the Isaac Briggs Donation
Land Claim No. 39, in Township 18 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian (said
Point of Begirming beihg by record 100.0 feet Southerly at right angles to Engineer's
Centerline Station 469 + 78.0 of said railroad); and rurmingthence South 00 0 I' East 287.7
feet; thence South 550 51' East 86.7 feet; thence South 41026; East 609,9 feet; thence South
48034' East138.10 feet; thence South.640 11' East 126.8 feet; thence South 700 37' East
429.29 feet; thence North 00 01' West 975,24 feet to the Southerly right-of-way line of said
railroad;.thence North 840 27' West along the Southerly right-of'way line of said' railroad
1102.0 feet to tlie Place ofBegirming, in Lane County, Oregon.
Date Received:
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submittal
.l..c=:",~_,.,
........--.... -5. 84."1q , ~
:s 8,.q.... ~.!.
. ~'IS""e.
3SS, .;.s.
.'.3800
2,51 AC..
^~----' .
,<;/ -;;.~-
~~ . --... 7.".,.......;;:-......._____
~,\ -7
!\I~ 3300 /{'l
')J'" . I /.Jr;-'.
)"" . ,} 100
Ii' 9J.~1t ,
~L.... --:..~-?~~ 'i-:c~" ~I
'.>?> .~-~_. r~ .1,/
V""~O~-1' ,r
~o~.
/ "
ON MAP
/ ,.p
35,';'
'TE 0,
/7 03
~~~..........
- "",-7 ~"W
...,.::: '"""',....,.
<!fy~ ~
~~.
. u q 701
-..!. '3">"\'13 \ 23.05 AC,
. ~ __. 1-...- __ _
E!\re.-~_ S i-?S9" -
INT. ELL COR.
5.~~~?~~~ (Q)cgJ ~(() 2
()~
-........... 11'2.7.0<--'
V G,~ (.,. ~9~~!!?wEi\I..t:-~, C; '-' '-'
o
.... .
cQ'
:'i'
!!!.
CJ)
c:
C"
3
;:;:
iii'
()
()
J
'<} )
!!i-':l
3700
C
l>>
CD
~
fil
<'
CD
R-
)>
c: .
c:;,
~
......
"'"
=
~
----.-.---.--..---. ._---, ----------.....--.....- ----..---.-----.--
\~-()7_Di
N
<>2
300
"OK
{ 400 )
i?"\\ v
:9
~
,
~
""-
THIS MAP IS TO ASSI S"-
lOCATING PROPER-TV
THE COMPANY ASSU.\~ES NO
LIABILITY FOR INACCURACIES.
N
;~ + E
$
COIJRiES'f OF
fYE~GREEN LAND TITLE CO
741-19B1
~-
1C
/?
.j~
"-
~
- ~
rI 0
, --.'(t"""-'--<.
,'"
.-
tr
S B '{a
"
20C
~~
'1 ,.
L.B.OLSON
& ASSOCIATES
INCORPORAT~D
Consulting Engineers
Land Surveyors
Urban Planners
380 Q Street
Suite 200
Springfield. Oregon
97477
(541)302-9790
Fax: (541) 485,3253
c'
Storm Water DcsignRcport
Project:
Datc:
Designer:
Type of Project:
Chambcrs Construction
July 1, 2008
Wade R. Holaday, PE
Commercial
Date Received:
AUG 2 7 2008
Proiect Overvicw
Original submittal
Constmct a 6,000 square foot fabrication shop. The project includes the addition of
6,000 sf of impervious area and the re-grading of the exisling gravel around the proposed
building. The mnoff from this area will be directed into the proposed bio-swale prior to
out letting into the existing roadside ditch. A small area (700 sf) between the new and
existing structures will drained into a catch basil) with a fossil filter insert,
Prooosed Destination
The drainage from the site will be directed to an existing roadside ditch along the gravel
roadway,
Proooscd Pollution Control Facilities
A bio-swale will be constructed at the southeast corner ofthe project to vegetatively filter
more than the 50% of the new impervious area. The catch basin for the remaining area
will bea catch basin with a fossil filter insert. .
Proiect Site Data
Impervious Area = 3,000 sf (bio-swale) /7" 3,000' sf pipe system (ncw buildmg)
Pervious Area = 19,173 sf (bio,swale) (gravel are~)
Water Quality Intensity = 0,19 inches per hour (Rational Method)
Peak Flow Intensity = 1.4 in/hr (2 yr, 10 minJ 2.4; inihr (25 yr, 10 min.)
Run offCoefficient= 0.90 (Commercial)
Water Oualitv Flow Calculations
>
Q = 0.90(0.19) 0.44 = Om5 cfs
.,., .
Peak Flow Calculations
Q = 0.90( 1.4) 0.44 = 0.55 cfs (2 yr evellt)
Q = 0,90(2.4) 0.44 = 0.95 cis (10 yr evcnt)
.,
:1
.j
,
:1
~ i
:i
:1
I:.
'i
i
i
;j
I
Bio Swale Flow Summarv
Bottom Width = I foot
. Channel Slope = 0:25 %
Channel Length = 100 feet'
Water Quality flow velocity = 0,10 Ips
Contact Time = 16.67 minutes
Water Quality flow depth = 0.32 feet
Date Received:
AUG 272008
-.':,,:ina1 Sl...!hm~tt?1
";,
Worksheet for Trapezoidal Channel, 1
Flow Element:
Trapezoidal Channel
Manning Formula
Normal Depth
Friction Method:
Solve For:
Channel Slope: 0.00250
Left Side Slope: 4.00
Right Side Slope' 4.00
Bottom Width: 1.00
Discharge: 0.08
Normal Depth: 0.32
Flow Area: 0.73
Wetted Perimeter. 3.65
Top Width: 3.57
Critical Depth: 0.05
Critical Slope: 2.60758
Velocity: 0.10
Velocity Head: 0.00
Specific Energy: 0,32
Fraude Number: 0.04
Flow Type: Subcritical
Downstream Depth: 0.00
Length: 0,00
Number Of Steps: 0
Upstream Depth: 0.00
Profile Description:
Headloss: 0.00
Downstream Velocity: Infinity
Upstream Velocity: Infinity
Normal Depth: 0.32
Critical Depth: 0.05
Channel Slope: 0.00250
ftlft
ftlft (H:V)
ftlft (H:V)
ft
ft~/s
ft
ft'
ft
ft
ft
ftlft
ftls
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ftls
ftIs
ft
ft
IUft
;'
Date Received:
~.':3 ~ ~ '''''9
,
!
On'";,.,.,, "uhrn""." '
:::tu.u,..:J ..J n...c::'____!
In
:J:
-../2.QlTl
M
..J
/
/
/
---.7
/
".
~
o!
I'
I'
.
g' "."J
f i!1 ,
$ 1'1'
L~'J7.
/
-, I f'..
I ,I ,
; ........
"\.. / '-
'; /'.. "
y,/; ;' :;.,......., "
/' /) ~/ .: . .". :"""'" "'-...
/ """'~",,., '...... "-
/ /' <....:.....f!);'F}~"::/" ',-_ /
. "'<?ifj'f II '\. ----r-
...,. .... -......--....:.---' ~
;! / "J . >~~--~1~--~--7-~-.~~i:-:.
-, I Y '. . .. . ,
__~\ ___~:! I! /."_,_.__~r --'---~_~_____-=___-~__ ~ ,,'
F -- J 'L . . '.'
_-~t~~~~~~--;:~-~f~- =.:' ...'..~~~~~,~~,~~~~ ....~~.~~~~~~~
-- ") \ --.' .... ..' '.'
. '. ~:.~-.~.~..-:~.~-\ :' -=---~>--~ '~--_.~~~ .
------ . .... c.:) r. '::.; --_ -__'-
---:-::'~...-' 1 \ . ---..,--___
...:~~-:::_..-c-::::"_=_ ",_ L.....:.--...:....:'\......: ~ ,":- ':,'.
--"'::':.._'c.~'~ :"-:S:t". \-~-"---'-c'~:....~,-
--:-------.---.-.c:---,.. C==--Jf---- -~---~:~~~~~~--~
........:... - '." , ;.\ \ - - -
--.-_-
---
'Hp~
!! b; g
" "
5! ~! : ;
;' ~. ! ~
;~~:! Iii
,
,
\
.\
Date Rec eived:
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submitt~1
I 1 >i'-- Z r--.
I, ~
.~
~,.o~ ~ !
:3 -
'4'~
If:-~l\
~
.,Il:IJlf""
-~~
I!OIf;c-113Oll-.fJIO
-POQ--'-
~~
,..~ K. __________
Olson &
Morris
Storm Management Plan
lor Phase J oj
Chambers Construc'tion:
~- -=-----
SpringJUId Lcmc Cauniv
,
Onlgrm.
> '.
OS/21/2008 IJ:55 FAX 541 736 1021
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD PW
- HU."<1<l:;'
I;j]OOl
IiJJOOl/003
PO$t-i'4' Fax Note 7671
,r~i+ M.r..;."
JCDJD"'PI,
IphOM '30?- '1.'10
IF"" 4,55-3'2:53
IDala 1'0' ~
p<\ge3
1;:O""B\\t'-1. (,.,.....--h~
'/"'000' ,'3.<.o-1t:l3-.
IF~" I~(,..lt::.~\
I
~ . ,ar-tltNQIoU!:LO 71 .
i~~~$~
J Pho,,", (54}) 726-3763. P.x,' (541) 736,102,1
STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
~~-'-""--'~":"'__~m-'--;---<""'_N_~_ (Ah!Ll b41(JW (!lis lilte jl/M4 (J1iI hy A.p{J/I~f1I1!) _~_~~...h_ '".....__~__.~.._
(Plr:4.'tJ 'erum 10 Marl SWlldcr@COyofSpringfhdd FlJblic'lYOJ'kJ El1gihee;~lJg: Fax # 736-IM1, PNQ"e # 7$t5.J()j5),
tIm~il: m!J(r::JUdf/F(ci)cj.sprinlffi~/d. or.,!'s
I,
Project Name: /.j....-.: lLu...... c.._d.........;./.;... RUt
AsseSlSOts:.Parcel I%-C'l,'~ DI _ oOJc:a
Land Use(s)! W-e~,l!,..,J'" 1""-))US...-x.I>'1..-"-
Project Size (Aer....): I ,","'/
. Approx, 1m pervion. Are.: I~/Jo~ "'.(~IJ: O^11)
Project Description (1l1dude a copy cif As~essor's map):
LQ.-....J.........LJ ~ 0I,t(nJ,",""","~4 1010CO rrl..
t;":>'~J ;-,,}Jt.- I...~-r ';1 fi....,...,.-), 4...J N9 l!h-.
Applicant:
DnlO:
''p&one#:
jFax#:
Email:
Co l.".... ~J Lo_;.J-v"h....':"-'-
. $' (u> /.~
302--979"0 JS[XI[l MQ'l'"1"1~Qn bcllaJfllfChnmbt:f'll)
q~)-~'1."'1,..
I' $.:<T1T.:t. o-'$c....JI.'!-.~_~;.,-.:'>, <--..
,f,~,'l.1"7 ''',Fr SovH- .,....,J ,.1 ;I'~),
'i"'(''VI';''''.lo.;~ J'H.<..... q. f",ofl'J..I.../ (~ ;"......,j),
mu "_",,.,
'Drain.Qgc Proposal (Pub1ic cOHnectiQn(s), di$chargl':: local'ion(s), 1?TC. Armchndd~o(lal.she~t(s) Ifrlecess<l1)'':
'fL,.: roc! .....4..-'~: Jj ~ d,,~cJ..J +, ..J1.", J",ll Itft-<'j o:I.h;'.J-J >:'_.n.. I
t't... p.-"I"~ ,;,.,'U'..\j'
I Prl1i:!Ogl'!N .stor.mw~ter R~t 1\1~na~ement ,Practice:<i: I
"- ~:I~ <:/-0-,1' ~;llk '""d...rw o...-!'-"- "",../J,~)it ~J -Ii., "',"(/ ~"" -h I
r;'I-k-- rv~. I-i L:_ )~o.< I ,,~I;~)I
IAretl hd(JW {!Jl.~'.I1JJl!' fif{t;d !1~tl1f...(.itr: {ml/-~/I(lI/;e A!JfJ!l{'./IIu}
(At a mlninHWt. ollboxcs cllec.kqd /1y. th'l G7/)i Qn (he-front and h~Jt. ()f,-'hJ,t,~'hr:~t ~'h(Jll be YUbm,'Iled
(", an afJDlication la he cOmlJ{ele fQJ' submiJIal. a/lho.lJ!h other re(ftJll~fHe/1fs may M neC2J.rarvJ
Drain"". Stlldv Tvo. IEDSPM Seetion 4,03,2): (Note, UH ma~ be ';lhstituterl for Rational' Meth~dl
"
II Small' Site Study- (use Rntiomu' Method fur ealoul.riol16)
o Mid.;..Lovcl De\leloPll1.ont Study - (use Unit Hydmgraph Method for calcuJE\tlo,ns)
.0 PuJI Drainage Development Study - (use: Unit Hyd~grapnMethod for l:BlcuJ~ons)
Environment>>:} COnsiderations:
'fij Wellhead Zone: \0 -"2c>"Ti__J:T;.",,,~ _\'"2..="-,,,-- ~ ~'Hillsidc Development: JU/...... ,
III WerlandIRiparian; l-I\\\\~i'-'<L !~. -\.-,,?~> L ',L",_ ,..~ Floodwa~/F'~o~dplain:' I(\c'r'~~ '"Ro..dpl.....---
\iii Soil Type: \ \ 9. - ~"""-..Q,.bu.,,,.J,,!l.,.,I (~"":' ley III Othy Junsdlctlons. ~)-- . .
Downsh-eJ:(ill A"ntvS'is~
~ N/A .
o Flow line for starting wMer sl1m"" eJevaion:
o 'Design HOLto u5e for "lartin!) wator surface, elevation:
o MannoldJunclicn to take annIysi~ to~
;
,.
,
,Retum,'0Ma1tStolldef.@ City OfSpnngfield, email.. >nstnuded@c;.sDdholleld.oru8. FAX; (541) 73B-(j8'te RGceive~1
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submittal
i
"'-I
OS/21/2008 13:56 FAX 541 7361021
.~. --, .........v ....".vv ............ .......J. ;r;ov ...~".)
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD PW
lJ.L;jUN <5C jHU.l<l<.t~
@002
@002l003
COMYLETE8TUDYlTEMS
r-r.r um~i~j Uu~ -KP c..
* BOJed upon Ih" in/ormolio", pI'olllded on rltC/fronl ofJ.hlf sheet. Jh~ff.J/lowing f'eprest!n1s a m;nlnm", o/what Lf needed/or un
app!krulo1r 10 bu "omple/~for _JUbmif/ul with rfUpt!Cl fa drainUf[/:: hOlVi\lt:r. this n$' should nOf hfl t/$tJd In lieu q/ ';'rs SpringfJdd
Devft/Qpmr:n{ Cede (SDC) or/he CiO'"(5 6nglll~irlng DesiQIt Manual. CompllanG~ wi,h the,,"/: requireltu!I1u-does 1101 '"CJnMittlIC .file
appr(/l1t'Jf: Addillona! situ ..~pecijic In!ol'htofiot'/ may be requirec!. Note: lJptln seaping ~hr:d JllbmlltaI. enslIJ'fr compleJ~rJfQrm haf bun
signed in ffle SpClce. prO';Jldlld he/ow;
tllterim Ull.'Iign Stl'IlIdQrds/\VlItilr QuaJif)-" (f:nS~J\1 Chl\Pfef 3)
~I!q 'd tv/A
~ DA.U non-building rooftop (NSR) impervrOI.Ul surfuces MaJI be pr~~tnSlte~ (e.g. m~dtj-c'lIounbered t:atchbasin w/oil tihrnlJQn
media) fur slormwot~r'lt.1nJity. Additionally. a. minimum 0'(50% of tho NBR impervious surfaceshalJ bo created by
vegetalxd mt'thods~. .
ti1 0 Whcc~ rcquJn:d, YegentivC3 stOnlJMrter Geslgn shall be consi.!.knt with inTerim design stalldB~ds (EDSPM Section 3.02), !O.-:t
. forth by the Bureau of EnvIronmental Serv'c/o1i (BES) or Clean W3~r Services (CWS),
. 0 For n~w NBR impervious area less than 15l0DO squnre feef;, a simplifb::d design approach may ~ followed as specifle.d by
the BES for vegebrtiv(I trtatmcnt. . . I
III 0 If a StOtmwa.ter crattment swate is proposed, submit caIcularlons/speclficmions. for sizing~ verotitY. tlow, side slopes, bottom
.!lJope, D.i1d seed mIx cO~'iistc.nt \Vith either BES (IrCWS ruqurn:mcllts,
MI 0 Water 'Qualit)' cmculatiOM 1\$ requited In SCGtion 3.0.'U ofrhe EDSPM
III 0 ^1I buHdillg- rooftop mounted cqurpment;or othor fluid containing equipmenr located ol1Isid~ of the building, shall
be.provided with secortdl1ty containment or 'W'l:athet tesi&rant enclo.3ure. .
Genenll StudY .Requirtm~D,m (EOSPM ~ctloll 4.DS) .
I!J 0 Dr.tinagc study preptu'cd by a PmreRSioml'l Civil Englneet licensed In thesbtl! ofOCCiOrl.
o ~ A complete drainago,study. Ll1 rnquircd In ~DSPM SectIon 4.03. J.,illd"uding ahydrorogieo1 study map.
~ 0 CRltuhdions Showing sy,tQni cap.rtehy fOT a 2~)'~flr storm event and'o~(:rfkI'W d[octs ot~'l5-'ye~ ~tom1 event.
o ~ The tirtl~ ofooncent'l'Mfon (Te) shill! bede1ermined usins a 10 minute start time for developed basillJ;,
Review ofDownlftTt:imSysfcm,(EDSPM Section 4..OJ.4.C) ,~ . d-
O ill A downstream drainage ana.lysis as described ;11 EDSPM Section 4.D3.4.C. Oh-sire drainage shall b.!: p* ~l~celve -
O"'gon Plmnblng Sp;oinlty CoCe (OPSC).
o 111 Elevations of the HGL Bnd flow fines fOr both city and privll!e sy.sttmswherc applicnble. AUG 2 7 2008
O~ign ofSto,rm Systems (EDSPM $ccHon 4.()4>
[WJ 0 floW" HMS. slo~e3. rim e1evatfCln5, pipe type and slzesclear.ty Indicata:h>r:l thd plan ser. . . :hm'tt I
o MJ Mintrnum pip<:: covor $hal.1 be 18 Jnche,!J fOr n:intorc.ed pIpe and 36 inch!::s for plain OOIlC(ote atIdQn9A~~ ~&lMi'::il':A?
proper engineering cnlculatit.ms sh~1l be provided when less... The cover shall be sufficient to support an SO,OOO Ib lond
wilhoul failure of The pip" structure.
D fjfJ Mannrng'!; 'In" values. for pip!:S" :>hl\H I;l~ consistent wfthTable 4-J of the EDSP. AIf ~torm pipes shalt be de:signed to
llC"hitvc: JJ minifTI~m velocity ofthrel! (3)fcct per sc:cond utO.5 pipa: full bascdon Table 4-1 as well.
OtherlM~
. !i 0 Exi!ning'lll1d proposed con-touts. located at one foot inte:rvnJ. Include spot elevatlons and site grndes showlt1f:. how site
dcnins
~ 0 Prival;: litOmlv{:9rer eastlrnet1L'i~ha" be clearly dc:lpiotod on plnn! wtHm privato stormwator 'flow! from one property to
amlther
o ~ DrywelJa 5hlll! no! recelvo l"llMt'lffftom any surfaoo w/o beinZ!l'e:arod by one or more BMPs. willi the exceptJon ofresidcntilCl
buHdlng roofl; (8DSP Secrion ),03.4.A). Additional prOVisions opply to lhb as required b)' the DEQ, Roft;:( to the wob.9ite:
\~'W\\',deQ..':CllU',or ,.llvwl1/umuncfwH/llichotl'lc.ht.t.Il for more inronnarion. .
[] (!jlJetentiQn 'pond.!; shall bt.:: designed TO fimit runoff to pre-development ~[eJ for the 2 through 25-yt:a.t :>lorm events
"'Thlsform. Shall tkbtdudrtcl as an QIlocl'~"" insidf! lhe.fronl r,:tlVt!T, o/lflt!3tormwater .ftUtty
"IMPOI?TAN" h.,,'CIN/:'ER Pl/!.JSIf RJfj/DBEJ.,OWi'
I ASIDe:' erigit1eerorr~cord. I hcitby certiry r.h~ above required lt~s are . -, I~ /0 'Ii
oomplete a"d Included with the 'ubmitted "ormw'le' ,""dy ""d pi"" S.. Sigllalu."e I I Date , 1
!'l~n~;....'i\'$ f<.....~'.ro...d- s-.ni"5 FO"'JYersionZ, M'foh.004 . '. r,_ \'1...1.- I \
V ~ bo::. \'.e.Ce..>::>or'-( -\.. _~-k """""1)"'- \. I""""~"'"
. ~~~"'~t:>di>.,-l..aKh.~ ~si-jt,..-!".b...d;~-k<V\"ll.fi'~ c\l!.~....
'(h"",A. ~e~-I., """'" "'''-{'~1,,'':~' '. .
i
I
i
I
,
i
I
I
,
I
"
!
,
r
; I
I
,
I i
I I
!
I
~ .
CATALOG ~IO.__
TYPE NO,
FloodPak Series
FPS
JOB NAME
ORDERING INFORMATION
Catalog Number: Example: FPS150NLXL,1
I FPS I
I
I'SERIES I
FPS'
FloodPak
Small
1 WATTAGE I
42-42W
70-70W
100-100W
150-150W
.1
I
!lAMP SOURCE 1
NlX-High
Pressure.
Sodium I LAMP I
(NPF)
llFt-Compact l-Lamp
Fluorescent furnished
HID units suppiied with clear medium base lamp.
ACCESSORIES
1120 Ii,
I I
I VOLTAGE I
H20V ".
Sloneo
1.5-1,
PRODUCT
SPECIFICATIONS
"
,
. The FloodPak is a peoecr blend
of architectural design and
performance.
. The FloodPakcan be surface
mounted in various positions. Use
,t as a cut -off wallpack or tip it up
22.50 for forward throw with
semi-cut-off. Tip it up 45'" for
floodlighting. or turn it over and
use it for indirect/accent lighting.
. The FloodPak can also be poie
mounted or ground mounted.
using mounting accessories.
. 'Precision die cast aluminum
construction, All exposed
hardware is stainless steel.
. Duraplex II dark bronze polyester
powder finish is standard but the
FloodPak is available in a variety
of designer'colors.
. Hinged door frame with clear
tempered glass lens.
. . M.ulti-faceted r~f1ection system
provides uniform distribution.
. Injection'molded triple finger
silicone gasket.
.. UL wet lopation listed for above
. or below horizontal aiming.
. Complete with a UL approved
mounting box rated for 900C
supply wire with integral bubble
level.
. Integral heat sink ensures cool
operation.
. Meets lESNA cut-off requirements.
. Contractor Frienaly design with
integral cable permitin9 easy, .
hands .free V:'iring. '
FPSKNUCKLE - 112" Adjustable Knuckle.
FPSARM, Shoebox Arm. Converts
FloodPak to pole-mount (minimum 4"
square pole).
FPSSHIELD ' Vandal. Shield. Helps
protect lens and lamp from breakage.
Clear polycarbonate shield snaps in place
over glass lens.
TECHNICAL INFORMATION
n' [l I"] I
o .' . _: 5-7/8"
_ .', L~
l~lo,-1 1- 11112,~1
'@
UL Wet Location Listed.
10/03
.;'.
Date Received:
AUG 2 7"2008 '
Original Submittal
crescenlflonCIJ
Cf"""'""'............ .~.
120~: Gloucester Pike .Barrington, NJ 08007.856-5<16-5500
FPS150NLXL-1 @450
MOUNTING OPTIONS'
00 Down
22,50 Down
crescenl,flonco
(I"......,'Il..i~...A.
i?':, E. Clouc:~sIBl Pike. 'Barringloll~ i i": 00007. 8S5-5'IIJ-fiSOO
FloodPak Series FPS
3~H I I I'~ I
J I <". .5 . I
J ~~B~l I
,I I
1MJ
~~~J
J
3MJ .~
I
3MH 2MH lMH 0 lMH 2MH 3!'-AH
FPS150NLXL-1 @ 22.50
FOOTCANDLE CORRECTION
Multiply the folloWing-factors times the
. footcandle values' for changes in
, mounting height. I-
Ta Change from 15'
New Hght. 8' 10' 15' 20'
Factor , 3.5. 2.3 1.0 0.6
'LAMP AND WAn CONVERSIONS
Lamp 50W', lOW '100W 150W
Multiplier .25 i~ 0.4 . .59 1.0
450 Down
00 Up
22,50 Up
450 Up
Date Received:
AUG 27 2008
Original Submittal
1(1/(13
CATALOG NO.
TYPE NO.
FloodPak Series
FPM
,
, JOB NAMF ,
,!
ORDERING INFORMATION
Catalog Number: Example' FPM175MAL-8
1 FPM!
I
SERIES
FPM.
FloodPak
Medium'
I WATTAGE I
57-57W
, -
70-70W
100-10QW
150-150W
175,175W
'I
'1
I ,I
I
I LAMP SOURCE I
MA-MetalHalide
. (GWA)
lX~High Pressure
Sodium
(HX-HPf)
HfL-Gompact
Fluorescent
. PMA~Pu!se Start
Metal Halide
(HX-HPF)
I LA,MP I
L-Lamp ,
. furnished
HID units supplied with clear.medium base-lamp.
ACCESSORIES
- "
I ,; I
[
I VOLTAGE I
H20V
,
B-120V.
20BV
240V,
277V
FPSKNUCKLE ' 112' Adjustable Knuckle.
FPSARM - Shoebox Arm. Converts
FloodPak to poie-mount (minimum 4"
square pole).
F'pMSHIELD, Vandal Shield,' Helps
protect' lens and lamp from breakage.
Clear po~carbonate shield snaps in place
over glass, lens. . 1~' ,
TECHNICAL INFORMATION
~IO '.,2 _I ~J
-~12-7/8.~
l,l~8'
I~~
'@
UL'Wel Location Lis\ed:
~O/93
"
Date Received:
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submittal
Sloneo
1.5-2
PRODUCT
SPECIFICATIONS
. The FloodPak is a perfect blend
of architectural design and
, periormance.
. The FfoodPak can be surface
mounted in various pQsitions. Use
it as a cut-off wall pack or tip it up
22.5" for forward throw with
semi-cut -off. Tip it up 450 for
floodlighting, or turn it over and
use it for indirect/accent lighting.
. The FioodPak can also be pole
mounted or ground mounted
using mounting accessories.
. predsion die cast aluminum
. construction. All exposed
hardware is stainless steel.
. Ouraplex II dark bronze polyester
powder finish is standard but the
. FloodPak is available in a variety
of designer colors.
. Hinged door frame with clear
tempered glass (ens.
. Multi-faceted reflection system
provides uniform distribution.
. Injection f!lold~d triple finger
silicone gasket.
. UL wet location listed for above
or below horizontal aiming.
. . Complete with a. UL appro\led
mounting box rated for 900C
supply wire wifh integral bubble
level.
. Integral heat sink ensures cool
opera1lon~
. Meets IESNA cut-off requirements.
. . Contractor Friendly design with
. integral cable psrmitingeasy,
hanrls free wiring.
crcsccnt.flllDCO
(1'"....."...._... - ;
120 E. Gloucester ~ike' Barrington, N.I 08007. 856-546cS5C'0
;
1.5-2
PHOTOMETRIes'
" 3MH.1 I .~~ 1;1
2JI II
. lMH _I. ~ /);( , I
.' I /~ I(?~ )
0- \(",~ "\
:::1 ~~~)
3J
I ,
3MH 2MH lMH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH
FPM1.75MA~-8 @Oo
:::1
J
I
I
::: - ~I
J
I 1- I
~"'\
4~~ 5 ~
1~~t -
~,-
~0/1 /
I~~/-
I I
0-
1MH
:::-~I
,I ,
3MH 2MH 1 MH 0 1 MH 2MH 3MH
FPM175MAL'8 @450 '
MOUNTING OPTIONS
QODown
22,50 Down
450 Down
CrcsceiJ~~/onco
CJ".,..-...,.,....HO....
120 [:, Gl0uceslor Pike. Barrington, NJ 0800T- 856-5-16-5.500 .
I
FloodPak Series FPM'
3MH I
J
J
_I,
;; hZ5
,r~I"---.
. ff;,~~
I :')~--J';'
I ~~
'~,,/ /
~ ,
3MH 2MH 1MH !' 0 1MH 2MH 3MH
FPM175MAL-8 @ 22.50
FOOTCANDLE CORRECTION
Multiply the following factors timeS the
1ootcand\e "Value's for changes 'In
mounting height.
To Change from:,15'.
New Hght :~8' 10' 15' 20'
Factor 3,5 2,3 1.0 0.6
LAMP AND WAIT CONVERSIONS
Lamp lOW 100W. 150W HOW
,'Multiplier ,36, .si 0.7 1.0
00 Up
22,50 Up
450 Up
Date Received:
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submittal
10/03
CATALOG NO.
TYpE NO.
. JOB NAMF
FtobdPak Series
FPL
ORDERING INFORMATION
Catalog Number: Example: FPL400MAL-8
I FPL I
I I I
SERIES [LAMP SOURCE I I VOLTAGE I
FPl- MA-MetalHalide 1-120V
FloodP,k (CWA) . 8-12DV,
Large 1 WATTAGE I lX-High Pressure '1 LAMP I 2DBV
Sodium .l-l,mp 24DV,
15D-15DW . (CWA) 277V
4DD-4DDW' furnished
"'Requires reduced outer jacketed lamp.
HID units sup~lled with clear medium base lamp.
ACCESSORIES
FPLKNUCKLE - Adiustable 2" Tenon
Slipfitter.
FPLARM - Shoebox Arm. Converts
FloodPak to pol,€?-mount -(minimum 4"
square pole).
FPLSHIELO - Vandal Shield. Helps
protect lens and lamp from br.eakage,
Oear polycarbonate shield sn~ps in place
over glass lens.
.'
TECHNICAL INFORMATION
~\ (1J8'-
-'-~ _.-~._-~~ - ~ ~
14-7/8"
,18-3/4"
Date Received:
AUG 2 7'2008
'@
UL Wet Location Usled.
Original Submittal
120 E. Glollcr;st(J~ Pike.. 8arrington, N.! 08007.856. 5116.-f)5QO
laiO?
,-
StoneD
1.5-3
PRODUCT
SPECIFICATIONS
. The FloodPak isa pertect blend
of architectural design and
performance.
. The FloodPak can be surface
mounted in various positions. Use
it as a cut-off wall pack or tip it up
22.50 for forward throw with
semi-cut-off. Tip it up 450 for
floodlighting, or turn it over and
use h for indirect/accent lighting.
. The FloodPak can also be pole
'mounted or ground mounted
using mounting accessories.
. Precision die cast aluminum
construction. All exposed
hardware is stainless steel.
.. Duraplex)1 dark bronze polyester
powder finish is standard but the
FloodPak is available in a variety
of designer colors.
. Hinged door frame with clear
tempered glass lens.
. Multi-faceted reflection system
provides uniform distribution.
. Injection molded triple fi.nger
silicone gasket.
. UL wet location listed for above
or below horlzontal aiming.
. Complete with a UL approved
mounting box.rated for 900C
supply wire with integrai bubble
level.
. Integral heat sink enSures cool
operation.
. Meets IESNA cut-off requirements.
. Contractor Friendly design with
integral cable permiting easy,
h8nds free wiring.
Crcsccntflonco
Cl"G!M.""",,*,u-
. '; .
1 ~5-3
PHOTOMETRies
3MH " .250
2MH ~~~.
/':~ \
1MH-~ &in'
0 \1 ()+ ·
1MJ
\~
. 2MJ ..~-1;
iJ I
, I 1"'----" r
"
3MH 2MH 1MH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH
FPL400MAL-8 @ 00
. 3MH I
'J
1// 1"-...
1/"--" 5 \
'd~ - \":\
It r::)s:s \
I / l ) .'
----'-- --\ \ '--...- )-
\ \ '-----
;0) (
, '\: '-c--' / j
I ., ,/,
1MH -
J
J
. 3MH 1
I
3MH 2MH 1MH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH
FPL 400MAL -8 @ 450
MOUNTING OPTIONS
00 Down
22.50 Down
450 Down
CreGeeDlflDDeD
.cr......"...""'...
~20 E. Gloucester F'iki.::' Barrington, NJ 08007. 85~-546;5500 .
3MH I
2MH I'
lMH--
o
J
2MH1
J
I'
~loodPak Series FPl
~~S'\,
;((:/ A'" '\ 1\
'(il{,'f,~1 \ " 11-
. . -1 _,__ I
(t...-Jr' I
~~/-)
i ~~/ I
'0...:./ I
3MH 2MH .1MH' 0 1MH" 2MH 3MH
',"
FPL400MAL.8 @ 22.5"
FOOTCANDLE CORRECTlON
Multiply the following factors times the
footcandle value's for changes in
mounting height;
To Change from'~20'
New,Hght ~'15'" 20' 25' 30'
Factor .1':78 1.0 .64 .44
LA.MP AND WATT CONVERSIONS
.'~mp
25QW
MH,
.57:' .
250W
HPS
.79
400W
HPS
1.39
400W
MH
1.0
Multiplier
00 Up
22.5" Up'
Date Received:
450 Up
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submittal 1nlm
"
~ ':~J
I
GeotechQical. In vesfigation
'. . ~ .
,.
,~
r
,~.
~~
t': '
''-., ,.
'.'
'.
.... +
,!'\:.
" ,-~
;:"' "
.",
.t',
.,
- .'~ .
~.~ .
'J"
',.:
~.
r
.'.
;';' ,"-',
~'. '.' ).. .f.; , .,- .,..
.": '"..,". :'.- - ~> <;. , ;~..; ,<!,~~.;:<:, ,"",',
;';., .: 'Jiine30:z008.:
;', -\ _ ~.:;.. .:~ -, '-, ~\'?-^:,.:J~i;;t:~i,
',~. -.
l' ,.~. ~,~
"
,,;
;,'
;/~ ' . ,'r:' ~
'j; ~
..
~ir.- .~.,
;.,.L
)""'.
"
,.
,;,"'.
,.
~,-'
" ~;-":r
;;:; ',~;'1:)<r:r\'~." .
oi'
~ ',," .
I";"'"
~ '!
..,'
. i:t'.ft ~ _ .,~., -; '_ _'. ',: ~
1)'ep<u:eaTQti~;f
, .n.i:" "~:',,;;\.}, - - ~r-. ':'>:r.,~._
", . "~ '. ,..f ,0< .,l ,~
,".: ,"" ~ p' ._' ~- ~.R' ~' " ~"~~'I': ":.'~~~.~~~'-j~",>
"CJham:Thets.,@o~stFui?fuit)ni ~:",
. . . ':' ''':'-?'''' .:,;tf.~;;:~~~'.:r'":.,r:,~tl'~'" '"
, , PrepanidoY;~-"""" ,: . ">, ,.'
: '"~:",,,~;);<.:F:\;;~?;~"'~t;;~l~"
, " ,,", <~'\j;, ' oct'
:..:: ""~S.0 ~;':'. c .--. ,"-., ;,.~ . :~'-.;)r" /' \'
,'~ !;P' ",~~a~~.hi"'.' ..,
. ,:,"'J!1l!tX~1:";" .Ii
d:~' \1t~~~,~"-:::':'
.\~ ,~~--~""~; .' - ~,
}~~:.(~~ .,:. " J t-
@"~~il~~3iA?tj:~>,' !
"'.'-.
.\-.
"-~
,"
,..'
"
l',',
'c' "
", .,.-.
,".
:)
,Date Received:
'.'
.\1'
AUG 2 7 2008
"
't.
. '.
"Q'GD C6hsoltih~t ~q'
S~rVing'pregoil Geotechnical DeSign and Consuflfrig Neqds
Origlr)al Submittal
~'! .~
1'.-
,,'. ~.
~~
~t 1,.
i' ~
.
.,
Q
"
1;
,
OGDConsulting,PC.
Serviilg 'O;egon' Gootee/mica/Design &' COIlSufting Needs
,;
l',
Daye Hoffman
Chambers Construction
30,28 Jugkins Road, #J
Eugene;c:iregon 97403
-"1
1~ .
Jyne30, 2008
i
'i
,
;'
.. ,~ '.
.R~:New~~(;p:BY!lding . " .
,Ha.milton'~O:nstrtidion , '~' .. , . ,.., .
.,' 22~3'South\!j:::,~Stre~t " " . ." Ji i', . ,,"
""~"'!i,!.:\~~!~~~).~~,..";:';;t;;;~,i ,',;', . ,~( . ,:;;: .
". ,/.'.. 'Proiect,No, 933-08-02 . ',;, ' ,,:,' .: 0> 0 'I' -. ': i'~.o:';" " .ic '
+). .:.' ,::.,.q.,....-" -. , '; 1~ i ~, :'l;~ ~,; - >~..- + >.,' ,'.. I" :-.'
.' .".'4 ~ ~,< " ~' . ,... t ,.. , " ~ > ~.',~ OJ J .
-:": "":.:.~',. ;:",,' ,_."<';' ,'t!;.-l.~. ' : ~/.~c, Ir:'"..,.':It,"--t '1'.:l'":~,-;"~,>,/,,.';il"r.':'~''-f''~''
.,Dear Mr.~Hoffman: :' ,":' , .' . _, 0 -' ;,..' , f'--'-;'.', . _. ',' _,' '': '.', _0, .
',,~ ,!.- .::c~;~. , ': ~', "'.~ ",~~. ;;-. -::- ~,~:~: :=.;:'~:~'.)~';.~-..; jl;i1;"; ~ .~t~[:<~'::\:~'~<~: Jfj~;<:~~~~.;~:~~/'
. '..J .".f.~, ',.,. iP ~~~-'"~ '-"M',',' ;.-~..~. "\";0;J~)..~ ~1,(.\'"+\''' 1- .?ifl._ ~I 'i'-"",iN"'~''\.<t''
- - OGD~G'onsulting. BC (OGD) l:ias'conlp'letea tlie requested gElotechrllcaJ:investigatibhjor,;.
ttie:: ro"'osed'devi3fb i1iciiCiifjn:Mii"~-bC;v~": iefe-ren6e'tC;slte:I~J.;,thT$;:'r;'; .,tit, iiicIGd~t:~a\ "
. . "d'&sS~i';tfoh of;'hu~:06fk; ia:l'di;ttu~~T6nf'}Jf;~r{~{'E8bartr8tlk~;;aR'd:.';relirhiri~"~" J8t~dihfc'~i'~~1 ~:
." '.'re8'o~%&i1dations:f6"'r.id~~i"ri:iilid:20if$trUEW6;;f6ftH~'''r~ '8S'~(fiH;"'?6(j~;W~~'t~1:' " ";;:!,' . . ,
..~~,. ::': ; \. ..>;".;"tj~:~::?:::.,,' "~.; :i~:';':;'~"~;,r~~~;~f!~::;;W;;,~~:l:;; ';::::':1:; 'c. .,:t~;:; y::,',', 0 ", ~
" :jfhe~~iiec:ih'dudes': rei~tiv~fy ai'fe':;filI fhatii1'~llfd~~~15T'ahi2~;a:nd(tri' t1 '1~~tic!i5lai. ,~'i;N~~fiil:'
,~:,_,,,,,,"t _,.J.,'">{~,, ~"''i';:'':''- f.H<~;~"', ~ ';',,:-,'~':" ,~,: "'''''''K' '~-~~"";:"',:"'''' ~;!'~..-, :'1); :~j!i.'~"""-h\"';;~-";":"Y1'",JJ':~,~4::-'~";';''''':- ~+' ,;-",," ;j..,g:il"'--'P_"~:"~C';'-'""'<;:I._X'i_~''''''''i''''' ""'-1"'<'-'" " _
"'_iJ'" i~;,expeGted~' to Hrahsitio,ri' to;~ II Livia I 9 r3"als;'?t tdepths:of;i.fc1.5: to ;20feefi"Theref6re ,':Vve'
.'..-' :OiJei r:JvEiifimrit' .wil 1;'8e"; ;r;~tdBst';g;ffectj\)e~'i6;'s'u "" fO li;:tHe'ff'''lahh'eJa'M'rlIdtUr&;)'~1\{''~ ad~\V~:'
,'7:f8tJ\ia~ti(;R~::, ..., 'RrEiiir'ffill'g". J:'~~~~8FnrhEfrl'Cl~ii68~~"f6f':;i;tdg~i"rNi'}5f.'''~f6'uti'Cl~jtffil~; ;:raw~~;",-
'." t .,;: "y~:m:f.'i'':'ij:;;:3~-'~'.><f^" . ~~i'.:iJ"';)(<;'~:''':;~:'tr:t:. _;;~:-;";:~';'f;&::0:I"-;':i~~>;-:i'i:. i'_'0-'S~":;':"!iX:1i\~j!-...1:,,;,"i};~4rf;\\'~:i,'~",A ":-; :";,;'~.'i',l'r(.-,:n,! ?,,''- i;'~ .'. v
c,~ons]i:Jer')tlons for, bUllqH!gp<;1dW,E!JJ,a~at]oniarE!J?roy].dE!_cJj~ere]n:;;:; "'. ': ,'i." "?<~~i?)"
':i::i:; ~~',;\,:3';~;::;:,;,' ..' 'l, '.,:~si/;i!~%,1:;~"j,;'!~ft'*~~;\t;;'1~1i,{:'~~lft~~I: ~}i;N;,rti~~;;~ I~: ;,;;:~. .~:::; .'
. J ':t~~A~~st;tH..\Sj ]nl~JT~'ft'2.~;m~~t?,x~~rrs~~~~n,!;;P,~~8~!,f;~~,~,~,~~,';~Y.~~;"j~~;pl~fJ.H[A,~~~\~t'.ng ',I,.
J..C;;,YoU,I'J!Jbj];)l~ pba1ie.() "yo.Y"iI?JOJe.sf ;Ele9se~;.9all'lt,Y .haveaoy ues.tloO~:9rwoyld"liJ5e:' ,
...., "f~~~t~~~~if~'~~~!~~;G~..,-:.': .~ii!;1 ~i:;'.', '
. OGD,Consultmg pc" ':-." 'c" .,..; ',:" ..,{." ,.,..." ,'",'iO,:,- ''''A'.
:' ~" :,. ' , : ,:t~/:/ 4/,7:P"'~ ,:;i~:::'.;i;';' A~;',~,-; :'~:;~:;,/V":
'1 B/xt"fJ(1~, '. ,ie{"!,;,, ' "
'. MerMcCracken~ P,E,. President ,. T,
,." "" .-, . ',' - .'.' .
'''\ '".~'~.
"'jL ';, ,'~1
::,:.. .,
"';t
,"'.~
";
'.;J
\,.r,.
;;', ~ 'I'
r~';' .
"
'. ,r"'
"!',
'1>+ '- i:-
f,',,";,j".
:, .
>!,' ,
l~. ! ' .'" ,.
. OateReceived:"
~ '..'
-"",
~
i>~'
AUG 2 7 2008
"J
,
,
,H '.
r.' ,'.
':'.
Origi~iill Submittal
.. '.
'-". ".. _ ", ' \J- ':
9027 f1iW'Fir Ridge}']a"e, Corvaliis, oregon 97336 .
. . .'(541)738~0895 "
, . ,-
,
'!'
::::.\ -..r
l.. '
~
Geotechnical Investigation
New Shop Building
Hamilton Constru(ftion
2213 South 'F' Street
Springfield, Oregon,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPENDIX A .:.. FIGURES ...................,..........",................,................"..,..:....,..,.............. 3
PROJ ECT INF()RMA TION ............"'......,:................~, ,..,""..,....." ........,...., :....,...........,...,.. 1
FIELD EXPLO RATION "''''.....................,.. ,.... ............,.., "'.. ............,..................,............, 1
SITE COND ITIONS""," """".. .""""""",.,;"", ,.",,:., "'" "":,, """"""",.."""..""""""", ..",2
Su rface Cond itio ns: ...,.."....... ,......., ...,.,....,.......,.,..,..",......"."...'.., ...."......",..,....,...,..,..,....,.., ,..,.., 2,
Su bsu rface C ond itions: ..".." ........, , ,:",............... ,..,..""..,.."".." .."......, ,.."""....,......,.......,... ,......' 2
Existing Datil; Review: .....".".:..............,..,..,..,..,..,..:.....,.....,..,...{...,..,....................,...................,.. 2
SEISMIC DESIG N ",.."."..",..",..""""""".. ,.."",.""""" '" ";""""",, ""..""""..""""""""" 2
,
DISCUSION OF GEOTECHNICAL ISSUES ..............,:.....:..,;...............................,.........,3
Existi n 9 Fi II:,...,..... ,.........................".,.."".., ,::.,..:,........,........:...]1"..,.......,........,...,..:,........,....."..,.. 3
Fo u n dations; ,......." ......,..,...." ........,. ,............... ........"..,..""..,....: ,......"..,.....".....,.,... ,... ...,.,.....,..... 3
Build ing Pads:........,' ,..... c.;,...........:.....,.' ......".."..,.., "".,.."..,:....:.............. ................ ,........".,........ 3
Weath er Cond Itlo ns: ........,....:.,.,.,......", ......,....,......... ,.. ,........,. J:,.........". ......,...."..,.......".."......" 4
RECO MMEN DA TIONS ,," ,...,.."."""""""..,..., :"""""",."..,:'.."..""",:"..""",. .'"""""" """ 4
Materia Is: ,... '"...,..... ............, ..',............".. ,..,......."...:......,.......;,.... ,!......,.., ......... ................................. 4
FoundationDesign and Construction: ....,....."..,..,...."..,..,.."....""...,....,...",....,......"".."",..",..., 4
Site Preparation -Bu I Idi ng Pads;........ ,.. ,.......,.."..,..............:.. .."..,',:....,........... ,...:,.........,..,..,:...... 5
(IMIlA TIONS OF THIS ~EPORT ....,...."......................,..:::........:::......................:......:....,5
APPENDIX A.- FIGURES
Date Received:
AUG2 7 2008
Original submittal
I' .
c-
Page 1 of 5 .
June 30. 2008
Geotechnical Investigation
New Shop Building:
Hamilton Construction
2213 South 'F' Street'
Springfield, Oregon
PROJECT INFORMATION
Hamilton Construction plans to construct a new shop' building at their existing facility
located at 2213 South'F' Street in Springfield, Oregon. The site, location is shown
on the Vicinity Map (Figure 1) included in Appendix A 'The proposed building area
is currently vacant and used for maierial storage.
The new develo'pment will incfude a new single story metal frame structure that will
be used for a fabrjcation shop. We understand that the new structure will be :1:6,000
SF in plan area and will consist of slab-on-grade 'construction. The structure is
planned to be supported by isolated column footings. The columns will also be used
tosupport overhead crane rails that will be incorporated into the new structure. We
anticipate that minimai site grading (cuts and fills of less than :1:2 feet) is planned
across the relatively flat site. ;- .'
FIELD EXPLORA liON
The field exploration focused on characterization of the upper soils at the site. We
visited tlie site on June 18, 2008 to observe surface donditions and conducted limited
subsurface explorations. During our visit we conducted a brief surface reconnaissance
of the proposed development area. Subsurface conditions were investigated by
.' . I
digging a test pit using a rubber tired backhoe provided by Hamilton Construction. The
test pit was excavated near the center of the proposed building. The approximate
locatioll of,the test pit and building are shown on th'e attached Site Plan (Figure'~,
Appendix A). The'test pit was excavated to maximum depth of :1:13.0 feet. The soil
profile was logged and representative samples were, collected from some locations.
Our surface and subsurfac!' 'observations are summarized in the foilowing sections.
.
Date Received:
AUG 27 2008
Original Submittal
New Shop Building
2213 South 'F' Street
Springfield, Oregon
Geotechnical Investigation
Project No. 933-08-02 .
,..,
..
Date Received:
Page 2 of 5
. June 30, 2008
AUG 2 7 2008
SITE CONDITIONS
Surface Conditions:
Original Submittal
The site includes relatively level terrain overthe entire proposed development area.
The ground surface of the storage yard generally consists of crushed aggregate
base. Immediately to the south of the proposed building area there is an access
road and it appears that grades slope downward toward the Mill Race further to the
w~. '
Subsurface Conditions:
Subsurface conditions. were evaluated using the testpit exploration ,and existing data
from nearby the site. Subsurface conditions observed at the site as part of our field
exploration included fill materials the full depth of the test pit (13 feet). The upper.
:!:0.5 feet of the fill consists of dense sandy gravel' with some silt. The gravel is
typically angular i-inch minus with some :!:3-inch minus graveL The upper gravel
grades to medium dense clayey gravel that is generally :!:3-inch minus. The clay is
highly plastic and moist. , The clayey gravel ,extends to a depth of :!:2.5 feet. Below
2.5 feet we noted soft to medium stiff organic clay. lihe clay is dark grey. very moist
. and has high plasticity. We noted moderate to large organic fragments within the
clay the full depth ofthe stratum.
. Existina Data Review:
The site is located in south Springfield with alluvial soils ,anticipated beneath the
development area. We reviewed aerial photographs, of the site as well as available
geologic mapping and well logs in the area. We', understand that the site was
originally developed for a flax seed mill over 50 years. ago. Therefore, we anticipate
that grading at the site and surrounding area has been in place for at least this long.
Our review of available well logs, in the vicinity of t~,e project suggests that alluvial .
sand and gravels underlie fhe area at depths of :!:5 to 15 feet. Based on our data
review. we expect that native alluvial soils that are capable of supporting the
proposed loads may be present at depths of :!:20feet. Deep'er field exploration
would be needed at the site to confirm the aclual.dep\h. '.
SEISMIC DESIGN
The average soil conditions in the upper :!:100 feet beneath the proposed
development area are expected to include predominately dense sandy gravel and
weathered bedrock. The proposed foundation system will be supported by the
alluvial soils, rather than the upper fill materiaL Therefore, we believe that use of a
site class D is appropriate for seismic design. P~ak ground accelerations and
spectral accelerations (on rock) were determined for1:design using 2% probability of
exceedence, in 50 years (i.e., 1:2,475 year return interval). The ground motions
provided in OSSCare based on the 1996 USGS mapping. however, the USGS
New Shop Building ,
2213 South 'F' Street
Springfield, Oregon
JI
Geotechnical Investigation
Project No. 933-08-02
.;
Date Received:
AU6 2 7 2008
Page 3 015
June 30, 2008
()riginal Submittal
updated the maps in 2002 to reflect improved modeling of the Cascadia Subduction
Zone earthquake. We have used the 2002 USGS modeling as the most current and
. accurate information for the site. This modeling considers a variety of seismic
sourcE;ls including crustal and subduction zone earthquakes. However, the principal
" source of the design ground motion is due to a largE:! magnitude (Mw 8.3 to 9.0)
earthquake along the Cascadia Subduction Zone.:t45 miles west of the site. Crustal
earthquakes were also considered. but do not contribute significantly to the design
ground motion. The, peak ground acceleration (PGA) on rock for the site is 0.26g
, with a short period spectral acceleration (S,) of 0:64g at 0.2 second period and long
period spectral acceleration (S,) of 0.30g at '1.0 second period. The parameters for
establishing the,General Procedure Response Spectrum using OSSC Section 1613
" are summarized in Table 1. The values for. SDSi and SD1 include a two-thirds
'reduction as discussed in Section 1613.5.4. . .
Table 1, OSSC 2007 Seismic Design Parameters
Site Ss S1 Fa Fv SM!; SM1
Class
0 0,64 0.30 I 1.29 1.80 0.82 054
DISCUSION OF GEOTECHNICAL ISSUES
SOS S01
0.55 0.36
Existina Fill:
Existing fill present at the site is ,unsuitable. for '?upport of the new structure
foundations. The upper portion of the fill material includes granular material and
appears to be relatively stable beneath the truck and forklift'traffic across the yard.
Based on the depth of the fill material, we believe ihat itwould be most cost effective
to support the new structure on deep foundations that bypass the fill material. Using
this approach it would be possible to 'float' the floor slab over the existing fill
material.
Foundations:
The proposed structure could be supported by a variety of deep fourldation types
extending into- the underlying alluvium. We understCjnd that Hamilton Construction
will likely use driven piles or a driven pile tip with reinf.orced concrete pier foundation
system' for the new structure. We understand that individual column loads of :t45
kips are anticipated for the. new structure, We expect~hat driven pipe piles :t18 to 24
inches in diameter could develop the required capacity with minimal embedment (:t5
to 10 feet) into the underlying alluvium.
Buildino Pads:
. We have assumed that the building pad will be built up slightly above existing site
grades to assist in promoting site surface drainagE; on the relatively flat site. In
addition, raising the building pad slightly will allow t~e new slab to be constructed
New Shop Building
2213 South 'F' Street
Springfield, Oregon
Geotechn;callnvestigation
Project No. 933-08-02
Page'4 of 5
June'30, 2008
Date Received:
AUG 2 7 2008
.
, Original Submittal '
over the existing granular fill material without further stabilization of the underlying
organic clay. < Therefore, we recommend using a leveling course of :1:4 to 6 inches of
compacted aggregate base over the existing granular fill surface to prepare the site
for the new concrete slab. '
There is someriskof long term settlement, cracking and faulting of the slab due to
the underlying organic clay fill material. this risk could be reduced by increasing the
concrete slab thickness and/or increasing the slab reinforcement. We understand
that complete mitigation of the fill.material and poteritialdifferential settlement is not
desired beneath the slab for .the shop building. '
Weather Conditions:
The site work is not.expected to include deep excavations and will generally;be
conducted from the existing granular fill which. is c,urrently being used as an all-
weather surface. Therefore, we do not anticipate that weather conditions will be ~
significant consideration for the proposed site work. .
RECOMMENDA liONS
Based on our observations of the soils and our ynderstanding of the proposed
development OGD believes that it will be practical 'to construct the improvements
using deep foundations to,support the new structure. . .
Materials:
1. Aggregate base as.defined in this report should consist of % or 1-inch minus,
well graded crushed rock. The 'rock shoyld b\,. relatively clean with less than
5% (by weight) passing the. #200 sieve. . "
2. Site fill,as defined in this report, consists of the upper granylar fill from
required excavations at the site. Site fill is not,suitable for placement beneath
. foundations 'and slab areas. Therefore, the use of site fill' will be limited to
grading in the areas surrounding the elevated building pad over the existing
granular fill material during dry weather conditions.
. 3. Compact all aggregate base and site fill to 95% relative 'compaction. The
maximum dry density of ASTM D 698 should be used as the standard for
evaluation of relative compaction. Field density testing should be conducted
on the compacted aggregate' base beneath the' slab that exceeds :1:8 inches in
thickness to confirm adequate compaction prior to placing reinforcing steel or
formwork. '
Foundation Oesianand Construction:
i.
4. Design all building foundations using deep foundation elements. We have
assumed that the preferred foundation alternative will consist of a driven pipe
New Shop Building
2213 South 'F' Street
. Springfield, Oregon
Geotechnicalln~estigalion
Project No. 933-08-02
~
Date Received:
AUG 2 7 2008
Page 5015
June 30. 2008
. Original Subi)1ittaJ
pile. . The pile foundations sho'uld tie driven to the required ultimate axial
capacity using a typical factor of safety of 3.0 using the FHWA Gates
Equation. . .
5. .AII piles should be driven to a minimum tip elevation of 20 feet below grade.
Actual pile depths and evaluation of pile capacity with depth would require
. additional deepe~ geotechnical investigation at the site.
. 6. Pile embedment depths and driving' resistan6'es should be 'monitored by the
engineer throughout construction. .
Site PreDaration~ Buildina Pads:
7, Elevate the building pad and grade around th,e perimeter of the structure to
promote surface drainage away from the slab';: .
8. Compact the existing granular fill surface. Ariolas of soft material (i.e., the test
pit location) should be excavated and replaced with compacted aggregate
~~, .'
9. Proof roll the prepared subgrade beneath the building pad immediately prior
to placement of aggregate base. Any areas of pumping or excessive
deflection should be excavated and replaced with granular fill or scarified;
moisture coriditioned and recompacted to provide a stable subgrade surface.
1 O. Plac~ and compact :1:4 .to 6 inches aggregate base over the approved
subgrade to support the building slabs.
LIMITATIONS OF THIS REPORT
The conclusions and recommendations contained herein are based on the
assumption that dee'p foundations will be used to support the new str'ucture and that
the actualdepthar:1d consistency of the alluvium underlying the site would be
confirmed at the time of constructiOn. The above recommendations assume that we
will be present during 'construction to confirm the assumed foundation and subgrade
conditions. We will assume no responsibility or liability for any engineering
judgment, inspection or testing performed by others. . !. .
. , '
Our work was performed for the exclusive use by Chambers Construction and their
design consultants for the new Hamilton Constructio~, Shop Building project located
at 2213 South'F' Street in Springfield, Oregon..OGD performed our work in
accordan'ce with generally accepted professionaIgeotechnical engineering practices
in similar locations. . Our services do not include any surVeyor assessment of
potential contamination or contamination of the soil or,ground water by hazardous or
toxic substances.. .~o other warranty, expressed or implied ,.is made.
New Shop Building
2213 South T' Street'
Springfield, Oregon
Geotechnical Investigation
Project No. 933-08-02
. -
~', ..
. .
Geotechnical Investigation
New Shop Building
Hamilton' Construction
. ,.
. 2213 South 'F' Street'
~pringfield; OregoN
Appenc-ix A
..........., .
...' _l~ 19urest
:\ .
J
-'j
Date Received:
AUG 2 7 2008
Original Submittal
OGD Consulting, PC
Serving Oregon Geotechnical Design and Consulting Needs -
'.
"':.
Date Received:
.AIJ~ ? 7 ?nnR
.
Original submittal
Q
.~
"'~1':~
..';.1.'"
'..;I: '&,,,)1,
(,-" ~:;:f ~-'
fif~~':,..I;
i',.lll\~:i."; ~
JA~;':+
~*11!b~::;'
~\\1~'!1' .
.'~Q;""'.' 'j"
".II""~' ,;~:i":1iF,iIi",\i"A:~:~_~"
.=~' :il~~ 0476' 9', E ..~-~::.,.':'~' '~I~~'~":~:~~.~
'~'"y"'~'&~~~ ",0 'I: .":-8'::1' .,~ ,';.. -"'.t1f' 80,:/" ] ~~-
'..,./f:~' ,qi~"J..:~l:'~':;~l" -l'r'.{;';::;;:~-'~ /' ';',:j,,,,) , : I~ ';[~
.../ rl:1fJ'/ <:~'.~~'1\'-.\1 I~.~~ '-"""l~~\2':'" I"~ oug~ Garden. r ':t/' :~~
-., '" y/ ,'~~ .... . ,i":,F -..,~~...... .' '\:'lIoy. . .
:,.. ,"" If ..'>, .", " ",''$;..\]' ~"" "., 6 ." ,.
/:"i-~,'\':/''':1ri /.-~,-:~/~ 47 i':' ~ '\'>~~--~'." ~ ,4"1 - "6 '. ::;!-.
:"/'I"~0j---;/'/\i'- ~ ;:'", \"~~1,~'\ '~;"".~,'" - "",. ~ .,J..:,
.-.ILX .';:(' , It. . ,11 ;:,~,( ,\,,,,,-", ",,'i-~ 0: a"~'IJ:'l'. ~. ...: ." .
~<l . ~ \ .~~.' ,"I" ,J:'; ~\'7V'. '\.III ,~ , .,;~,,- "" ~ ,-rw1z::.. iI*' ....~,~
....:
9027 NW FIR RIDGE PLACE
CORVALLIS, OR 97330
1541) 753-0895
VICINITY. MAP
2213 SOUTH 'F' STREET
1~
NEW SHOP BUilDING
SPRINGFIELD"" OREGON
"
FIGURE NO,
OGD CONSULTING, PC,
Serving Oregon Geotechnical Oesi91 and Consul ti~ Needs
1
. .
.
.. ,.. ...
. ..,ate Received:
AUG 2 7 2008
'"
.
. Original Submittal
Q
1...
OGO CONSUL lING, PC.
Serving Oreqon GeotecMicol Oesi~ end Consulting Needs
9027 NW FIR RIDGE PLACE
CORVALLIS, OR 97330
15411 753-0895
SITE ptAN
2213 SOUTH .F' STREET
NEW SHOP BUILDING
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
FIGURE NO.
2
.
..