Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotice PLANNER 8/6/2008 RECEIVED AUG 62008 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICI; BY:1l&Vb~ ~ STATE OF OREGON) ) ss County of Lane ) I, Karen LaFleur, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows' 1 I state that I am a Program Technician for the Planning DIvIsion of the Development Services Department, CIty of Springfield, Oregon 2. I state that In my capacity as, Program Technician, I prepared and caused to be mailed copies of jvB2aJ8-00031 {J~a. ~ - ~~..",,~ , - (See attachment "A") on _l/fA -,2008 addressed to (see '7nC'KL..L.... Attachment B"), by causing said letters to be placed In a U S mall box with postage fully prepaid thereon. KA~~RO)a~ STATE OF OREGON, County of Lane alM.J!vOi & . 2008 Personally appeared the above named Karen LaFleur, Program Technician, who acknowledged the foregOing instrument to be their voluntary act Before me OfFICIAL SEAL DEYETTE KELLY NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON COMMISSION NO 420351 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG 15, 2011 ;/\,. AI ;:;Liu/ ~ u '2: /;S-/!! My CommissIon Expires Date ReceIVed ~//,;IQO.r Planner: AL TYPE II TENTATIVE PARTITION REVIEW, STAFF REPORT & DECISION PrOject Name: James Scott McKee PartItIOn PrOject Proposal: PartItIOn one reSIdential parcel mto two reSIdential parcels Case Number SUB2008-00031 PrOject Location' ] 742 Delrose Avenue (Map 18-02-05-12, Tax Lot #1900) Zomng: Low DensIty ReSIdentIal (LDR) ComprehenSIve Plan DesIgnation. LDR (Metro Plan) Pre-SuhmIttal Meetmg Date. May 16, 2008 ApplIcation SubmItted Date' June 30, 2008 DecIsIon Issued Date' August 6, 2008 RecommendatIon Approval wIth ConditIons Appeal DeadlIne Date August 21, 2008 Natural Features' None DensIty Approxunately 4 5 umts per acre .ni,{;1iY;t.-iim-4itS:~'~J;'_~>(;' ,. . '._' j~-l'~,'l _-J 1\:~.,. J!'~'~~,.,r:rt'>:l '-_'_'m'" .' ~ >.. " dl~_' " J>_li".~...... 1 , ~.1i.l~:~~, -\"::-i 1;..~\ d '. . .~.\4 (1.\7 '.. "; ,'i;;;il ~\'~r :-- ~. . l',.,",,.,., "','1'"'' .../,,~, .',,0, ',.. ;fI';f ,fI.to"'" IE" ,.' . "'#""- ~~. I, :~.....-~ ...~-'-.- .'~, ~ f,'-" ',.,',. ,f'",--,~,~ ~" "," ., ,-','~, ;"1<J!" ,,&. ., ,~ ~'~'.' :, ;.~.;~ l . ,." "'\"'~ ":"BJ:I.~=c ~;'tn: ~. - ~ "'i~ C -dJJ'" .:; ~.~ ,-,., '--~--.- :.~]~ii€<Ii;,-:~.':'"": L..;/ "1~": -:~. ere::'''j ,,:..Y~rt-i'';:'il ~ '-&).11:"~' " ,19 I' .. ,...L....t1A'.'t"'.....1 '.,>, - ~t~ ';:C~___'" z/t: - .~~;_1 -. ~ ,'~~-~' ':..':;~~ ~~'R~, : ~,.t.:... I.... '" " ~ '1 ';' ]"TimY. .7"1 : ' , ~.,-,'.,~~- ...;..................-..........,,: /""1'" , .' ''?~' ~.... --:: _ -;. :~ f '1 I ~--.4 ~)~\ "f .~1 ;'L.\ ~''':'- i '.. -.;, I /il:,,'ltr:r-o:" ,.,' ?,l'i'~ ~~ ,;' "1 . t:( ;.;-.~~{ '" ~-Q.~ . Li}!r,",,";.. ~ --.: SITE .f~,,(~F~::..,sH~ ~,!_,_ "L!D~ n!:!F,-1.0 !'):;"-"~""" . "f'-"l, r''''"'. . ,,:: ::W~Uji t '. EQ'{ ..<:tr_~_!~ :.:.Tr~__~'/i'JJ:.<f!;'>l :. ~;{.t,h ".~ ", l' , ,,"", 'e, , , ' __ . :..... ................. ;J'<. ~. . " f'" . ,~'7"':"" ,,~ .., ~ . .,.._."..... /'i':~ ;:;;-<.; ..;1 -;; _ ~:.;..;:l.o -: ~, .. k,_~:!:D~lrose Ave.~0~'"~: .. ~~ ~~,~D.~ I f , ~"",-;l,:.' ,.---'-.... . .., '" .,..." ~--'-,~'" ~.. ,- ".:.,<ao;~ ~ ...-. - I f ,:..; ?-" ..:,!.',...s=C;:;:"\'il:f=::i:-iJ-"". ';'; ','''' ,.s'! ~. .p. -. ~ ~ ~]~ I. t I 'I~rtt"""",s ,:. ~ r ~':= ." , ':":. ,"'" -- ~ r,. ~_;:,;:~~__,~ ~llll.:l- ":'l.'~. v. -.~ . I . - I . , ., , t .::'{. /~ ~... "f'~ --:_'" - c tI)] . ~i."s';::-::-~:J~I fitlfj~.~; ~ .~t. r'/, '-~ . cjp. 1'1 . ~" J' .~:t'T i" .- ~, . ,! .c J'...'.4m~.. :",..,. ';t'...~_ --', " .. ; 'J."" _Ii" ....9LJI..... . .: I..... C'- ,.. ,r- " ~ ' . .,.. , ,,~. -",.., ,{'J ," (3" I " " ~ hI.. ,\--- ,:-:<r::-,."''';'~,~;;:;'' :-,":"" ..~.: _A";J:-'':'" _11 ~ . ",Ill" "" '.. r::,:~'-f 't;" . ::": /.~..... .r'~J::::ll~.~ ~:~t.7. ~~~-::-;. ::::~- .~'_ . . - .:;.: ...~"'~.,:~';.....:~'h:. ~~~ :~"Jj"~Jt," . .,,;..~';""_t~ -.~ 'I' ~i~~!{';,,:~.:,---'t~~. ASSOCIated ApplIcatIons ZON2008-00017, PRE2008-00028 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM I POSITION I Pro] ect Manager I TransportatIon PlarulIng Engmeer I PublIc Works Engmeer I PublIc Works Engmeer I Deputy FIre Marshal I Commumty ServIces Manager REVIEW OF Plannmg TransportatIOn UtIlItIes Samtary & Storm Sewer FIre and LIfe Safety BUlldmg NAME Andy Lrmblrd JudIth Johnduff Enc Walter Enc Walter Gilbert Gordon Dave Puent PHONE 726-3784 726-7134 736-1034 736-1034 726-3661 726-3668 APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM Owner/ApplIcant. James Scott McKee 834 Pearl St Eugene, OR 97401 Surveyor: Engmeer Rob Ward Ward Northwest Inc POBox 105 Florence, OR 97439 Dan Olmstead EGR & ASSOCIates, Inc 2535 Prame Road, SUIte B Eugene, OR 97402 Date Received Planner. Al fJ. /cJt7or f / DECISION TentatIve Approval, wIth condItIons, as of the date of thIS letter. The standards of the Sprmgfield Development Code (SDC) applIcable to each CrIterIon of PartItIon Approval are lIsted herem and are satIsfied by the submItted plans and notes unless specIfically noted WIth findings and condItIons necessary for complIance PUBLIC AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS, AS WELL AS THE FINAL PLAT, MUST CONFORM TO THE SUBMITTED PLANS AS CONDITIONED HEREIN ThIS is a lImIted land use deCISIon made accordmg to CIty code and state statutes. Unless appealed, the deCISIon IS final. Please read thIS document carefully (See Attachment A and Page I I for a summary of the conditIons of approval) OTHER USES AUTHORIZED BY THE DECISION None Future development wIll be m accordance With the prOVISIons of the SDC, filed easements and agreements, and all applIcable local, state and_ federal regulatIOns REVIEW PROCESS: ThIS applIcatIon IS reviewed under Type II procedures lIsted In SDC 5 1-130 and the partitIOn cntena of approval, SDC 5 12-100 This applIcation was accepted as complete on June 30, 2008 This deCISIOn IS Issued on the 37th day of the 120 days mandated by the state SITE INFORMATION. The subject site IS a rectangular-shaped lot With an lITegular eastern boundary COmprISIng approximately 19,440 fi' (0 45 acres) The property IS a corner lot With frontage on Delrose Avenue to the south and Grand Vista Dnve to the east The subject property contams an eXistIng dwellIng m the western half of the p,vp~';i The sIte IS zoned and deSIgnated Low DenSity ReSidentIal (LDR) In accordance With the Metro Plan The Assessor's descnptlOn for the subject property IS Map 17-03-24-31, Tax Lot 1300 Approval of the proposed partItIOn would create two LDR parcels one contammg the eXlstmg house With frontage on Delrose Avenue, and a vacant corner parcel With frontage on Delrose A venue and Grand VIsta Dnve WRITTEN COMMENTS Procedural Fmdmg ApplIcatIOns for Limited Land Use DeCISIOns requIre the notificatIOn of property owners/occupants WithIn 300 feet of the subject property allowmg for a 14 day comment penod on the applIcatIOn (SDC 5 I - I 30 and 5 2-115) The applIcant and parties submlttmg wntten comments dunng the notIce penod have appeal nghts and are mailed a copy of thiS deCISIOn for conSideratIOn Procedural Fmdmg In accordance With SDC 5 1-130 and 52-115, notIce was sent to property owners/occupants wIthm 300 feet of the subject site on July 3, 2008 No wntten comments were receIved CRITERIA OF PARTITION TENTATIVE APPROVAL SDC 5 12-125 states that the Director shall approve or approve With conditIOns a PartitIon TentatIve Plan applIcatIOn upon determmmg that cntena A through J of tlus SectIon have been satIsfied If conditIons cannot be attached to satlsty the cntena, the DIrector shall deny the applIcation A. The request conforms to the prOVISIons OfthIS Code pertammg to lot/parcel Size and dImenSIOns Fmdmg I Pursuant to SDC 3 2-215, parcels on east-west streets shall have a mmunum parcel Size of 4,500 square feet With 45 feet of street frontage Fmdmg 2 In accordance WIth SDC 32-215, proposed Parcel 1 exceeds the mmunum requIrements for parcel SIZe and street frontage Fmdmg 3 Pursuant to SDC 3 2-215, corner parcels shall contam at least 6,000 square feet WIth at least 45 feet of frontage on an east-west street, and at least 60 feet of frontage on a north-south street Fmdmg 4 In accordance With SDC 3 2-2 I 5, proposed Parcel 2 exceeds the mmunum requIrements for corner parcel SIZe and street frontage ,,, Oat€! Received ~ ) \, \ J.e<> ~ Planner. 41:. 2 ConclusIOn This proposal sattsfies Cntenon A B The zonmg IS consIstent wIth the Metro Plan diagram and/or applIcable Refinement Plan dIagram, Plan DlStnct map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Fmdmg 5 The subject property IS designated Low Density ReSidential (LDR) by the Metro Plan diagram The zonmg of the property IS LDR, consistent With the Metro Plan, and the applicant IS not proposmg to change the zonmg designatIOn ConclusIOn This proposal satIsfies Cntenon B C. CapacIty reqUIrements of pnblIc Improvements, mcludmg but not lImIted to, water and electnclty; samtary sewer and stormwater management facilItIes; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the publIc Improvements shall be available to serve the sIte at the ttme of development, nnless otherwise proVIded for by thIS Code and other applIcable regulattons The PublIc Works Director or a UtilIty prOVIder shall determme capacIty Issues. General Fmdmg 6 For all publIc unprovements, the applIcant shall retam a pnvate profeSSIOnal CIVIl engmeer to design the partItIOn unprovements m conformance With CIty codes, thiS decIsIOn, and the current Engzneerzng DesIgn Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM) The pnvate CivIl engmeer also shall be reqUITed to proVide constructIOn mspectlOn services General Fmdmg 7 CIty BUlldmg Permits are reqUITed for mstallatlOn of pnvate utIlitIes Developers are adVised to obtam necessary CIty permits pnor to mltIatlOn of constructIOn actIVity General Fmdmg 8 The Public Works Director's representatIves have reviewed the proposed partItion City staff's review comments have been mcorporated m fmdmgs and conditIons contamed herem General Fmdmg 9 Cntenon C contams sub-elements and applicable code standards The partitIon applicatIOn as submitted complies With the code standards listed under each sub-element unless otherwise noted With specific fmdmgs and conclUSIOns The sub-elements and code standards of Cntenon C mclude but are not lunlted to Public Improvements m accordance With SDC 4 2-100 and 43-100 o Public and Pnvate Streets (SDC 4 2-105 - 42-]45) o Sarutary Sewer Improvements (SDC 4 3-105) o Stormwater Management (SDC 4 3-110 - 43-115) o UtIlitIes (SDC 4 3-120 - 43-130) o Water Service and FITe ProtectIon (SDC 4 3-130) o Public and Pnvate Easements (SDC 4 3-140) Public aud Pnvate Streets Fmdmg 10 SectIOn 4 2-105 G 2 of the Sprmgfield Development Code reqUires that whenever a proposed land diVISion or development wIll mcrease traffic on the CIty street system and that development has any ummproved street frontage abuttmg a fully Improved street, that street frontage shall be fully Improved to City specificatIOns ExceptIOn (I) notes that m cases of ummproved streets, an Improvement Agreement shall be reqUired as a conditIon of Development Approval postponmg Improvements untIl such ttme as a City street Improvement project IS mlttated Fmdmg II The subject property has frontage on Delrose Avenue and Grand ViSta Dnve Both streets are fully Improved to urban standards With pavmg, curb and gutter, Sidewalk, street trees, underground uttlItIes, and street lIghtmg Average dally traffic on each street IS estImated to be fewer than 300 vehicle tnps per k Date Hecelved Planner AL r /6/:MdY / I 3 4t-- j -\ I J. ~. I day Because the streets are fully Improved, an Improvement agreement for future street pavmg will not be reqUired Fmdmg 12 An eXlstmg 8-mch sanitary sewer line m Delrose Avenue termmates near the mldpomt of the south property Ime The sanitary sewer Ime may have to be extended m the future to serve properties to the west, and the applicant would be responsible for a proportIOnate share of the cost for extendmg the sewer lme along the property frontage Therefore, m accordance With SectIOn 2 02 1 of the EDSPM, an Improvement Agreement for a future sanitary sewer extensIOn (from the current termmus to the western property Ime of the subject site) Will be requITed With the partition Fmdmg 13 In accordance With SDC 43-140, new street trees are reqUired where development abuts public street nghts-of-way Where street trees cannot be planted m the nght-of-way, eXlstmg trees m the front yard setback can be substituted for street trees m accordance With SDC 4 2-140 B Mamtenance of street trees on pnvate property IS the responsibility of the landowner Fmdmg 14 There are eXlstmg street trees along the property frontage, mcludmg the southern and eastern edges of proposed Parcel 2 In the event that dnveway placement for Parcel 2 results m removal of a street tree, It shall be replaced m an appropnate location along the affected street frontage Conditions of Approval: 1 Pnor to approval of the Fmal Plat, the applicant shall execute and record an Improvement Agreement for Delrose A venue for future sewer extensIOn to the western edge of the property 2 The dnveway to serve Parcel 2 shall be sited such that eXlstmg street trees are not adversely unpacted In the event the dnveway mstallatlOn results m removal of a street tree, It shall be replaced at another locatIOn along the affected street frontage ConclUSIOn As conditioned herem, eXisting transportation facilities would be adequate to accommodate the additIOnal volume of traffic generated by the proposed development m a safe and effiCient manner Sanitary Sewer Improvements Fmdmg 15 SectIOn 4 3-105 A of the SDC requITes that samtary sewers shall be mstalled to serve each new development and to connect developments to eXlstmg mams Additionally, mstallatlOn of samtary sewers shall proVide sufficlCnt access for mamtenance activIties Fmdmg 16 The eXIstmg dwelling IS served by a septic tank and dramfield m the east half of the property The tentative partition plan depiCts the location of the on-site septic tank proposed for decommlsslomng The Lane County Sanltanan IS responsible for conf1TIllmg septic system decommlsslOnmg Fmdmg 17 There IS an eXIstmg 6-mch lateral stubbed mto the site near the mldpomt of the south property Ime The eXisting lateral extends from an 8-mch public samtary sewer line m Delrose Avenue that runs approX1IDately 120 feet east to a manhole m the mtersectlon of Delrose Avenue and Grand ViSta Dnve The applicant IS proposmg to mstall a Y -connection from the eXIstmg 6-mch lateral to serve both parcels The Y- connection IS proposed at the northern edge of the Delrose Avenue nght-of-way Pnvate sewer Y- connections are not penrussable Wlthm public nght-of-way, therefore, an alternate location mSlde Parcel I will be reqUired for the samtary sewer Y -connection To achieve thiS, the samtary sewer Y -connectIOn to serve Parcels 1 and 2 could be adjusted northward mto the streetslde 7-(00t Wide PUE for Parcell Fmdmg 18 To accommodate the sanitary sewer Y-connectlOn, the applicant IS proposmg a pnvate sewer easement across the extreme southeast comer of Parcel I for the benefit of Parcel 2 The easement location and dunenslOns may reqUITe adjustment upon relocation of the sanitary sewer Y -connection discussed above Date Received .. \ .. \ -z-, 'I, Planner AL " , 4 Fmdmg 19 The eXlstmg and proposed sanItary sewer Imes are adequate to serve the proposed development CondItIons of Approval 3 Pnor to approval of the Fmal Plat, the apphcant shall provIde wntten continnatlOn of on-sIte septic system decommIssIonIng from the Lane County SanItarIan 4 Pnor to approval of the Fmal Plat, the apphcant shall submIt a revIsed pnvate utIhty plan for the sanItary sewer Y-connectlOn, such that the pomt of connection IS outsIde the pubhc street nght-of-way The adjusted location shall be revIewed and approved by the CIty Engmeer and shown on subsequent BUlldmg Pennlt plans 5 Pnor to approval of the Fmal Plat, the apphcant shall obtam necessary CIty pennlts and mstall the sanItary sewer Y -connectIOn at a locatIOn satIsfactOl)' to the CIty Engmeer Storm water Management Ouahtv Fmdmg 20 Under Federal regulatIOn of the Clean Water Act (CW A), Endangered SpecIes Act (ESA), and NatIOnal Pollutant DIscharge EhmmatlOn System (NPDES), the CIty of Spnngfield IS reqUIred to obtam, and has apphed for, a MUnIcipal Separate Stonn Sewer System (MS4) pennlt A provlSlon of this pennlt reqUIres the CIty to demonstrate efforts to reduce the pollution m urban stonnwater to the MaxImum Extent Practicable (MEP) Fmdmg 21 Federal and Oregon Department of Environmental Quahty (ODEQ) rules reqUIre the CIty'S MS4 plan to address SIX "MInImum Control Measures" MInImum Control Measure 5, "Post-Construction Stonnwater Management for New Development and Redevelopment", apphes to the proposed development Fmdmg 22 Mmlmum Control Measure 5 reqUIres the CIty of Sprmgtield to develop, Implement and enforce a program to ensure the reductIOn of pollutants m stonnwater runoff to the MEP The CIty also must develop and Implement strategies that mclude a combmatlOn of structural or non-structural Best Management PractIces (BMPs) appropnate for the communIty Fmdmg 23 MInImum Control Measure 5 requrres the CIty of Spnngfield to use an ordmance or other regulatory mechanIsm to address post-constructIOn runoff from new and re-development projects to the extent allowable under State law Regulatory mechamsms used by the CIty mclude the SDC, the City'S Engmeermg DesIgn Standards and Procedures Manual and the future Stonnwater Faclhtles Master Plan (SFMP) Fmdmg 24 As rf1qurred m SDC 43-110 E, "a development shall be reqUired to employ dramage management practIces approved by the Pubhc Works Director and consIstent [With] the Engmeermg DesIgn Standards and Procedures Manuaf' Fmdmg 25 SectIOn 3 02 of the CIty'S EDSPM states the Pubhc Works Department WIll accept, as mtenm desIgn standards for stonnwater quahty, water quahty factlltles desIgned pursuant to the pohcles and procedures of eIther the CIty of Portland (BES), or the Clean Water ServICes (CWS) Ouantltv Fmdmg 26 Section 43-110 B of the SDC reqUIres that the Approval Authonty shall grant development approval only where adequate pubhc and/or pnvate stonnwater management system provIsIOns have been made as detennmed by the Pubhc Works Drrector, consistent With the EDSPM J. Date Received Planner AL [>II, ~(}f I'/' 5 " Fmdmg 27 SectIOn 4 3-110 D of the SDC requrres that runoff from a development shall be drrected to an approved stormwater management system with sufficient capacIty to accept the dIscharge Fmdmg 28 SectIOn 43-110 E of the SDC requrres new developments to employ dramage management practIces that lI1,mml7e the amount and rate of surface runoff mto receIvIng streams, and that promote water quahty FIndIng 29 To comply WIth SectIOns 4 3-110 D & E, stormwater runoff from the sIte wtll be drrected to curb weep holes and dIscharge to the eXIstIng curb and gutter system The curb and gutter system draIns to two eXlstmg catch basIns one located north of the property on Grand ViSta Dnve and the other west of the property along Delrose A venue Because the street frontages of the property are fully Improved and mclude provIsions for stormwater management, additional measures are not requrred for thIS proposal UtilItIes FIndIng 30 SectIOn 4 3-120 B of the SDC requrres each developer to make arrangements With the utIhty provider to provide utIlIty hnes and facIlItIes to serve the development area Spnngfield UtilIty Board (SUB) ElectrIc IS the provider for electncal service to the subject property Fmdmg 31 The apphcant IS responsIble for the cost of desIgn and InstallatIon ofutlhty hnes and facIlItIes In accordance with SDC 4 3-125, all utlhty hnes shall be placed underground FIndmg 32 The apphcant IS propOSIng to extend electrIcal and telecommumcatlon lInes from eXIstIng nsers along the frontage ofthe adjacent property (Tax Lot 1200) The utIlIty lmes Will be mstalled wlthm a 7-foot WIde publIc utlhty easement (PUE) along the west SIde of Grand VISta Dnve Water ServIce and FIre ProtectIon Fmdmg 33 SectIOn 4 3-130 A of the SDC requrres each development area to be proVided WIth a water system havmg suffiCIently SIzed mams and lesser lInes to furnIsh adequate supply to the development and suffiCIent access for mamtenance SUB Water coordmates the desIgn of the water system wlthm Spnngfield CIty lImIts Fmdmg 34 The apphcant's submittal mdlcates an eXlstmg water service connectIOn IS stubbed mto the northeast comer of proposed Parcel 2 Fmdmg 35 There IS an eXlstmg fire hydrant wlthm 200 feet of the subject site that proVides coverage for frre protectIOn PublIc and Pnvate Easements Fmdmg 36 SectIon 43-140 A of the SDC requrres apphcants proposmg developments to make arrangements With the CIty and each utIhty provIder for the dedicatIon of utIlIty easements necessary to fully service the development or land beyond the development area The mmlmum Width for PUEs adjacent to street nghts-of-way shall be 7 feet The mmImum WIdth for all other pubhc utIlIty easements shall be 7 feet unless the Pubhc Works Drrector reqUIres a larger easement to allow for adequate mamtenance Fmdmg 37 In accordance With SDC 43-140 A, there IS an eXlstmg 7-foot Wide PUE along the Grand Vista Dnve and Delrose A venue frontages of the site Fmdmg 38 The apphcant IS proposmg to extend a pnvate samtary lateral from a Y-connectlOn on Parcell to serve Parcel 2 A pnvate sewer easement on Parcel I wtll be requrred for the Y -connectIOn servmg Parcel 2 As stated and conditIOned prevIOusly (see CondItIOn 3), the easement configuratIOn wtll need to be adjusted to accommodate the relocated the Y -connectIOn Date Received '6\1. \:lAlOlIi Planner AL 6 Fmdmg 39 The applicant's tentatIve plan deptcts an eXlstmg shed III the northwest corner of proposed Parcell The shed encroaches wlthm a 5-foot Wide pnvate dram tIle easement (ReceptIOn No 3301 dated May 14, 1965) runnmg along the western property Ime Because It IS a pnvate easement, placement of the shed IS entIrely at the nsk of the property owner Staff recommend the applicant obtams a release for the dram tIle easement, If possible, through the partItIon process Conditions of Approval: 6 Pnor to approval of the Fmal Plat, the apphcant shall adjust the locatIon and dlInenslOns of the pnvate sewer easement benefitmg Parcel 2 7. The pnvate sewer easement agamst Parcel I and benefitmg Parcel 2 shall be recorded pnor to or concurrently With the Fmal Plat ConclUSIOn As conditIOned herem, this proposal satIsfies Cntenon C D The proposed development shall comply with all apphcable pubhc and private deSign and construction standards con tamed m thIS Code and other apphcable regulatIons General Fmdmg 40 Cntenon D contams two elements With sub-elements and applicable Code standards The partitIOn applicatIOn as submitted complies With the code standards listed under each sub-element unless otherwise noted With specific fmdmgs and conclusIOns The elements, sub-elements and Code standards of Cntenon D mclude but are not IlIDlted to D I Conformance With standards of SDC 3 2-200 (ResidentIal Zonmg), SDC 4 4-100 (Landscapmg, Screenmg and Fence Standards), SDC 46-100 (VehIcle Parkmg, Loadmg and BIcycle Parkmg Standards), and SDC 5 17-100 (SIte Plan ReView) o Parcel Coverage and Setbacks (SDC 32-215) o Height Standards (SDC 3 2-215) o Landscapmg Standards (SDC 4 4-105) o Screenmg (SDC 4 4-110) o Fence Standards (SDC 4 4-115) o On-SIte LightIng Standards (SDC 4 5-100) o Vehicle Parkmg Standards (SDC 4 6-100) D 2 Overlay DistrIcts and Applicable Refmement Plan ReqUIrements o The site IS wlthm the 10-20 Year Time of Travel Zone for Sprmgfield drmkmg water wells o The site IS not wlthm an adopted Refmement Plan area D 1 Conformance With standards of SDC 32-200 (Residential Zomng), SDC 4.4-100 (Landscapmg, Screenmg and Fence Standards), SDC 46-100 (Vehicle Parkmg, Loadmg and Bicycle Parkmg Standards), and SDC 5.17-100 (Site Plan ReView) Parcel Coverage and Setbacks Fmdmg 41 The apphcant IS proposmg to retam the eXistIng dwelling on Parcel I As proposed, the dwelling on Parcel I meets the reqUIred bUlldmg setbacks ofthe LDR Dlstnct With the exceptIon of the rear yard setback In accordance With SDC 3 2-215, the minImum rear yard setback for residential dwellmgs IS 10 feet measured from the rear property hne The apphcant's tentatIve plan mdICates the north face of the eXlstmg dwellmg IS located wlthm 9 67 feet of the rear property lme This IS conSidered an eXlstmg, non- conformmg SItuatIOn for the purpose of thiS review However, the proposed land partitIon does not mcrease the degree of non-conformity for the rear yard setback A deed restnctlOn or SimIlar mechanism wIll be reqUIred to notIfY successors m tItle of the defiCient rear yard setback --' Date Received Planner AL f'1t, /;0'/ I I 7 ,,' Fmdmg 42 Proposed Parcel 2 IS a corner parcel, and development setbacks will be determmed based on the onentauon of the dwelhng to either Delrose Avenue or Grand Vista Dnve Condluon of Approval 8. Pnor to or concurrent With recordmg of the Fmal Plat, the apphcant shall record a deed restnctlOn agamst Parcel 1 advlsmg that the eXlstmg dwellmg has a deficient rear yard setback of 9 67 feet, where 10 feet IS the mmlmum reqUired setback m accordance with SDC 3 2-215 Height Standards Fmdmg 43 In accordance with SDC 3 2-225, the maxunum bUlldmg height m the LDR District IS 30 feet, except where modified by solar access standards Fmdmg 44 Pnor to Issuance of bUlldmg permits for a house on Parcel 2, the developer will be requrred to demonstrate complIance with the solar access standards of SDC 3 2-225 Landscapmg Standards Fmdmg 45 In accordance With SDC 3 2-215 footnote (5), all buildmg setbacks shall be landscaped unless the setback IS for a garage or carport Screemng Fmdmg 46 There IS no requrrement to mstall screenmg between comparable LDR parcels Fence Standards Fmdmg 47 The Development Code regulates the height and style of fencmg m reSidential diStriCtS However, there IS no reqUirement for fencmg between comparable LDR parcels On-Site LIghtmg Standards Fmdmg 48 It IS not expected that outdoor reSidential IIghtmg for the eXlstmg and proposed dwellIng will cause hght trespass onto adjacent properties Vehicle Parkmg Standards Fmdmg 49 In accordance with SDC 4 6-100, a minimum of two off-street parkmg spaces are requrred for each dwellmg Unit The parkmg requrrement for Parcel 1 can be accommodated With the eXlstmg dnveway and garage Fmdmg 50 At least two paved off-street parkmg spaces Will be requrred pnor to Issuance of occupancy for a future house on Parcel 2 Condition of Approval. 9 Pnor to Issuance of Fmal Occupancy for a dwellmg on Parcel 2, at least two paved off-street parkmg spaces shall be developed on the site ConclusIOn As conditioned herem, thiS proposal satisfies Cntenon D 1 -l/, r ,.' Oate Received '61'0 \-z-,9, Planner AL 8 , ,,' I' D 2 Overlay Dlstncts and ApplIcable Refinement Plan ReqUIrements Fmdmg 5] Development RevIew staff have revIewed the applIcatIOn m regard to the Dnnkmg Water :'.v;~v;.on Overlay Dlstnct and Refmement Plan reqUIrements The subject sIte IS wlthm the ]0-20 Year TIme of Travel Zone/Zone of ContnbutIon for the ] 6th & Q Street wellhead No specIfic poliCIes of the DWP Overlay Dlstnct or the Metro Plan apply to the proposed partItIOn Fmdmg 52 As stated prevIOusly, the developer or future landowner WIll be requIred to abIde by the solar setback requIrements of SDC 3 2-225 when applymg for bUlldmg permIts on Parcel 2 ConclUSIOn ThIS proposal sattsfies Cntenon D 2 E. PhYSIcal features, mcludmg, but not lImIted to: steep slopes With unstable sod or geolOgIC conditIons; areas with susceptIbIlIty to floodmg; slgmficant clusters oftrees and shrubs; watercourses showu ou the Water QualIty LImited Watercourse Map aud their associated npanan areas, wetlands, rock outcroppmgs, open spaces, aud areas of hlStonc and/or archaeo]oglcal slgmficance, as may be speCified m SectIon 33-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358905-955 and 390235-240, shaU be rpotectedeatures have been evaluated and protected as speCified m thIS Code or other applIcable regulatIons Fmdmg 53 The sIte does not contam steep slopes or unstable SOlis Fmdmg 54 The sIte IS not wlthm an IdentIfied wetland area and does not contam SIgnIficant trees or shrubs Fmdmg 55 The Metro Area General Plan, Water QualIty LImIted Watercourse Map, State DeSIgnated Wetlands Map, Hydnc SOlis Map, Wellhead ProtectIOn Zone Map, FEMA Map and the lIst of Hlstonc Landmark sItes bave been consulted and there are no features needmg to be protected or preserved on thIS sIte If any artIfacts are found dunng constructIon, there are state laws that could apply, ORS 97 740, ORS 358905, ORS 390235 If human remams are dIscovered dunng constructIOn, It IS a Class "c" felony to proceed under ORS 97 740 ConclUSIOn ThIs proposal satIsfies Cntenon E F. Parkmg areas and mgress-egress pomts have been desIgned to facilitate vehlcu]ar traffic, bIcycle and pedestnan safety to aVOId congestIon, prOVIde connectIvIty WIthm the development area and to adjacent reSidentIal areas, transit stops, neighborhood actIVIty centers, and commerCIal, mdustnal and publIc areas; mmlImze dnveways on artenal and collector streets as specIfied m thIS Code or other applIcable regulatIOns and comply WIth the ODOT access management standards for State lughways Fmdmg 56 The Development ReVIew CommIttee reVIewed the proposed 2-]ot partItIOn at a meetmg on October 23, 2007 The eXlstmg and proposed dnveways are suffiCIent to serve the proposed parcels As preVIOusly condItIOned, addItIOnal off-street parkmg IS reqUIred for proposed Parcel 2 (CondItIOn 8) TransportatIon System Impacts Fmdmg 57 Abuttmg the subject sIte to the south, Delrose Avenue IS a 32-foot WIde asphalt-paved roadway wlthm a 60-foot WIde nght-of-way Abuttmg the subject sIte to the eas!, Grand VISta Dnve IS a 32-foot WIde asphalt-paved roadway wlthm a 50-foot nght-of-way Both streets are fully Improved to urban standards Along the property frontage, average daIly traffic on Delrose Avenue IS eshmated to be 250 vehIcle trIpS per day and average daIly traffic on Grand VISta Dnve IS eshmated to be ]50 vehIcle tnps per day -, Date Rec61vea Planner AL .f /~ /~i " .It/ I" 9 Fmdmg 58 Based on lTE Land Use Code 210 (Smgle-Family Detached Housmg) full development of an additional parcel with a smgle-falmly residential use would generate 10 additional vehicle tnps per day and I PM peak-hour vehicle tnp onto the surroundmg street system Fmdmg 59 Assumed development also may generate pedestnan and bicycle tnps Accordmg to the "Household" survey done by LCOG m 1994, 126 percent of household tnps are made by bicycle or walkrng and I 8 percent are by transit bus These tripS may have their ongms or destmatlOns at a vanety of land uses, mcludmg thiS site Pedestnan and bIcycle tnps create the need for sidewalks, pedestrian crossmg signals, crosswalks, bicycle parkrng and bicycle lanes Fmdmg 60 The nearest regular transit bus service IS provided by LTD Routes #18 (MohawklFalrvlew) and #19 (Falrvlew/Mohawk) operatmg along Q Street and Marcola Road Fmdmg 61 EXIstmg transportatIOn faclhtles would be adequate to accommodate the additIOnal volume of traffic generated by the proposed development Site Access and Circulation Fmdmg 62 InstallatIOn of driveways on a street mcreases the number of traffic conflIct pomts A greater number of conflict pomts mcreases the probablhty of traffic crashes SDC 4 2-120 permits each parcel to have one dnveway access Fmdmg 63 The eXIstmg parcel has one dnveway servmg the dwelhng on proposed Parcel I The proposed partitIOn Will create the need for one addltlOnal dnveway to serve Parcel 2 Two potential locatIOns for the new dnveway are depIcted on the submitted tentative plan Both of the proposed locations have been reViewed, and either location IS acceptable to TransportatIOn Staff Fmdmg 64 In accordance with SDC Table 4 2-2, reSidential dnveways servmg smgle family homes must have a paved surface 12 to 16 feet Wide and at least 18 feet long as measured from the edge of property lme Fmdmg 65 As proposed and conditIOned herem, the eXlstmg faclhlies are adequate to meet the site access, dnveway, and VISion clearance reqUirements ofSDC 4 2-120 and 4 2-130 Conditions of Approval: 10 The apphcant shall proVide and mamtam adequate VISIOn clearance triangles at the corners of the site dnveways m accordance With SDC 4 2-130 11 A maximum of one dnveway Will be permitted to serve the future dwellmg on Parcel 2 The locatIon of the dnveway shall be consistent With either of the two optiOns depicted on the tentatIve partitIOn plan 12 The dimenSions ofthe new dnveway servmg Parcel 2 shall comply With SDC Table 4 2-2 ConclUSiOn As conditIOned herem, thrs proposal satisfies Cntenon F G. Development of any remamder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplIShed as specIfied ID thIS Code. Fmdmg 66 There IS no other property under the same ownership that can be further developed ConclUSIOn ThiS proposal satisfies Cntenon G . I.' ,. Date Received Planner AL f 161m! I / 10 " , H Adjacent land can be developed or IS proVIded access that wtll allow Its development as specIfied In thIS Code Fmdmg 67 Adjacent land IS currently developed WIth resIdential dwellmgs and has access to pubhc streets ConclUSIOn This proposal sal1sfies Cntenon H I. Where the PartItion of property that IS outsIde of the CIty lImits but WithIn the CIty's nrbamzable area and no concurrent annexatIon applIcatIOn IS submItted, the standards specIfied below shall also apply. Fmdmg 68 The property mvolved III thiS proposal IS Illslde the City lumts Therefore, thIS condition does not apply ConclUSIOn ThiS proposal satisfies Cntenon I CONCLUSION. The tentative partItIOn, as submItted and condItIOned, complIes wIth Cntena A-I of SDC 5.12-125. PortIons of the proposal approved as submitted may not be substantively changed durmg plattmg WIthout an approved modIfication applIcation m accordance WIth SDC 512-145. What needs to be done' The apphcant wlll have up to one vear from the date of thIS letter to meet the apphcable conditions of approval or Development Code standards and to submit a Flllal Parl1t1on Plat Please refer to SDC 512-135 & 5 12-140 for more mformatIOn THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE FINAL PLAT MUST BE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMITY WITH THE TENTATIVE PLANS AND THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. The Fmal Plat IS reqUired to go through a pre-submittal process After the Fmal Plat apphcatIOn lS complete, lt must be submitted to the Spnngfield Development Services Department A separate apphcatIOn and fees Will be reqUired Upon signature by the City Surveyor and the Plannmg Department, the Plat may be submitted to Lane County Surveyor for signatures pnor to recordmg No IndIVidual lots may be transferred unhl the plat IS recorded and five (5) copIes of the filed partItion are returned to the Development Services Department by the applIcant CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL' 1 Pnor to approval of the Fillal Plat, the apphcant shall execute and record an Improvement Agreement for Delrose Avenue for future sewer extensIOn to the western edge of the property 2 The dnveway to serve Parcel 2 shall be Sited such that eXlstmg street trees are not adversely Impacted In the event the dnveway Illstallatlon results m removal of a street tree, It shall be replaced at another locatIOn along the affected street frontage 3 PTlor to approval of the Fillal Plat, the apphcant shall proVide wntten confirmatIOn of on-site septic system deconnll1sslOnmg from the Lane County Sanltanan 4. PTlor to approval of the Fillal Plat, the apphcant shall submit a reVIsed pTlvate utlhty plan for the samtary sewer Y-connectlOn, such that the pomt of connectIOn IS outSide the pubhc street Tlght-of-way The adjusted location shall be reViewed and approved by the City Engllleer and shown on subsequent BU1ldmg Permit plans 5. Pnor to approval of the Fmal Plat, the apphcant shall obtalll' necessary City permits and mstall the samtary sewer Y -connectIOn at a locatIOn satisfactory to the City Engmeer 6. PTlor to approval of the Fmal Plat, the apphcant shall adjust the location and dllDenslOns of the pnvate sewer easement benefitmg Parcel 2 , . , Date R.ecelved Planner AL ~ h /~oi' I , 11 7 The pnvate sewer easement agamst Parcel I and benefitmg Parcel 2 shall be recorded pnor to or concurrently with the Fmal Plat 8 Pnor to or concurrent With recordmg of the Fmal Plat, the apphcant shall record a deed restnctlon agamst Parcel I advlsmg that the eXlstmg dwellmg has a defiCient rear yard setback of 9 67 feet, where 10 feet IS the mmunum reqUired setback m accordance With SDC 32-215 9. Pnor to Issuance of Fmal Occupancy for a dwellmg on Parcel 2, at least two paved off-street parkmg spaces shall be developed on the site 10. The apphcant shall provide and mamtam adequate VISion clearance tnangles at the corners of the site dnveways m accordance With SDC 4 2-130 11. A maJomum of one dnveway will be penmtted to serve the future dwellmg on Parcel 2 The location of the dnveway shall be consistent With either of the two optIOns depicted on the tentative partitIOn plan 12 The dimenSIOns of the new dnveway servmg Parcel 2 shall comply w1Jh SDC Table 4 2-2 AddItIonal InformatIon: The apphcatlOn, all documents, and eVidence rehed upon by the apphcant, and the apphcable cntena of approval are available for free mspecl10n and copies are aVailable for a fee at the Development Services Department, 225 Fifth Street, Sprmgfield, Oregon Appeal: This Type IT Tentative Partition deCISIOn IS considered a deCISIOn of the Director and as such may be appealed to the Plannmg CommissIOn The appeal may be filed With the Development Services Department by an affected party The appeal must be m accordance With SDC 5.3-100, Appeals An Appeals apphcatlOn must be submitted to the City With a fee of $25000 The fee Will be returned to the appellant If the Plannmg CommissIOn approves the appeal apphcal10n In accordance With SDC 5 3-115 which proVides for a IS-day appeal penod and Oregon Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 10(c) for service of nollce by mall, the appeal penod for thiS declSlon exprres at 5'00 pm on August 21, 2008. QuestIons: Please call Andy Llmblrd m the Plannmg DIVISion of the Development Services Department at (541) 726-3784 or email ahmblrd@cl sonngfield or uS If you have any questIOns regardmg thiS process Prepared By' ~:!J Planner II Encl Attachment A - Tentallve PartitIOn Plan - ~- ~---- ,,' 'I Date Received. Planner AL ~ ~ ?,H; I' 12 Please be advIsed that the followmg is provIded for mformatIon only and IS not a component ofthe subdIvIsIOn decIsion. FEES AND PERMITS Svstems Develonment Char2Ces The applIcant must pay applIcable Systems Development Charges when budding pemuts are Issued for developments within the City lImits or within the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary The cost relates to the amount of Increase In ImpervIOus surface area, transportation tnp rate, and plumbing fixture umts (Spnngfield Code Chapter II, Article II) Some exceptIOns apply to Spnngfield Urban Growth areas Systems Development Charges (SDCs) wIll apply to the construction of bUildings and site Improvements wlthm the subject site The Charges wIll be based upon the rates m effect at the time of permit Issuance for bUlldmgs or site Improvements on each portion or phase of the development Among other charges, SDCs for park and recreatIOn Improvements Will be collected at time of bUilding permit Issuance for a future house on Parcel 2, and would be based on the SDC polIcy In effect at that time WIllamalane Park and RecreatIOn DiStrIct adVIses that the SDC for park and recreatIOn Improvements IS presently $2,513 for each new smgle-famlly dwellmg Samtarv Sewer In-Lleu-Of-Assessment Pay a Sanitary Sewer In-Lleu-Of-Assessment charge In additIOn to the regular connection fees If the property or portIOns of the property being developed have not prevIously been assessed or otherwise partIcipated m the cost of a publtc sanitary sewer Contact the Engmeenng DIVISIOn to determine If In-Lleu-Of-Assessment charge IS applIcable [Ord 5584] PublIc Infrastructure Fees It IS the responsibIlity of the pnvate developer to fund the publtc Infrastructure reqUired to proVIde utilItIes to the property Other Cltv Permits . BUilding Permits - In additIOn to standard reqUirements, the developer shall abide by the solar setback reqUirements of SDC 3 2-225 when submlttmg for bUlldmg permIts for the dwellIng on Parcel 2 . Encroachment PermIt or Sewer Hookup Permit - RequITed for working Within a nght-of-way or publIc easement Example a new tap to the publtc storm or sanItary sewer, or adJustmg a manhole The current rate IS $135 for processmg plus applIcable fees and depOSits . Land & Dramage AlteratIOn Permit (LDAP) - An LDAP wIll be requITed for new home construction Contact the Spnngfield PublIc Works Department at 726-5849 for appropnate applIcatIOn reqUIrements AdditIOnal nermlts/annrovals that mav be necessarY . Plumbmg Permit to Install stormwater dram pipes and connect the future house to a drywell system . Electncal Penmt . . DIVISIOn of State Lands (stormwater discharge, wetlands) . Department of EnVironmental QualIty (erosion control, stormwater discharge, wetlands) . US Army Corps of Engmeers (stormwater discharge, wetlands) ~ \. " , ' , ' Date Received ~/ ~t7J' Planner AL 13 I , !I I -----~--~~~----~----------- ! : I , , :t1 :~I= '" : I , , i ~ , , , I , , : I , , : I , , , I , , , I , : I , , , I , , : I , , : I , , , I ! , I! ; ATTACHMENT A -----------~---------- I h8Bh~ :!h!l /' "",.-' ,< '-, !! !.ll K~~~ 1Il1 I,,' f~~ ~ ;gi --:~ , . gi~.bE i~lo:U ""~w-=-~ i QJ.OM<ruO<llw....,..awo_ " ~""""" " ......... !<<~ ' '.....::::u~~~ ....., ,.""I!l ---'<</;. -!~ ~ I~-_-- i..::--------- : \ : r ~-7.::..-" ~ ,1M ~ I I I I ........... ____ ---, I ~ I I ~ ' ,.............. ~~ ' ' i !',...l I '.::.>-," " - ~,,-.) ! I !:, _ w. __'. ~ ?II !~l"~ Ii ..,.. ''::'-:::::--- - l\'\' IS.,UX ............__-.""" -.' .......... _.:"':":"-~-, i Ii, -~':-~ l I 'l;sl \ I J: I :' /1' I : i~~! !j ~_ I 1 ~ ,ii' I .: 'if \ ~: ~ I ~! 0 /' I., r I I : ~ I : i, I : j! I r",-: . 11 \ L' I : , I ~: y ; 1 ~: I ~,I .: I : 0 I I' ..I : I: '/_ I -_.~~"~: ~~ I i''':%~ L l .,., I 1"<,....... __._ _____ a'l lV- - I ~I~ I , ~I!i '1(: . .ii I~ I / I I ~~ J I I ,It I , ' .' ! ~g I i i , i g , , I ~i L ~I , u;~ 'I~l ", Sld~ 1./ ih I I I I Ii ; I I, I II ; i j ~I 11 l 50 ", we ~~ <. ., o ~ . ~ i_ ~i 11 ~- , I : IV: II : I ~o : 1'"- : I '/:: I ~ ~ I ~ f I : 0 , ( J t, t! , I I l'~.' -"~'I J1 1......."., ~ it \ r i: I' ,I, _I, " 'l"i >1 ~ !i I -'- I.~ .. r- 1..'\ Ij",..lll~, I' ,'. ! \ ,.. , ,. ~ ~ 'w 'w 0_ i!i~ : ~5~ <t: , ~o" 0 , 3"'~g9 I ~"'''''''w I ~~~~~ ~e~~~ ~ , ~! ~ii~ Ml . . !il ; l!ih ili! ; I' el!i ",...!" ! ,i Iii, ll!;i Ii; ~ , Lil !)!! !llli l .~ In,!.ll , ''''', II I I I, , , Ii; : ! I , "I h , di! I~~~~~~ ~ II! ~ lil"I:'j!'l' !'1i mdh"d!!~n : :,f,; : ';;:" l<IllQO.IIll.O 0: ~;: : .2 :1 II Date Recelved:~!)#l>g WI Planner Al SI:CONl;l.o.JlOrTlONOI:LIl.OSE flOCK 55 PAGEl! " .1 a r- -n m ~ 1 , I " Ii! !!i r! ill i , I I , I i "I" , I i !, ,i~!i ,.11 hI' 'Ill dl!~ <'j ~ II -;; !' ~ n ~ ~ 1: Ii ~ d .7' II l...,v' 1 ';;1 CD, >, 'CD U CD , n:: CD - as o co ~, <=> ~ -- C> :.~~ ,... C0 -, :z: i :::I ..' ...., , ," " c. , , , , : , '. B, " .. . r i ! .. -[ , . l t ~ ~i .~! I:,' ~ --I i L ~~ ,Ii ~t!i i! ! ~~~ 'II r t I : j / 'h CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 225 5th ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 .. Dan Olmstead EGR & Assoclates, rnc 2535 Prlalre Road, SUlte B Eugene, OR 97402 .~.,. ---.- '\ CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 225 5th ST SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Rob Ward Ward Northwest rnc PO Box 105 Florence, OR 97439 , . '.t" .'.'/.- ' ',\ >, I ~ I I: ~\; CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ',' '. ',,",;; '~, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT "" /j .I';' : 'It~) /J," 225 5th ST ,', ,'.,."" c SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477' ",".'," "'~ ,', , ,I ',j ~ I lI,~ 'iii' \ t : 1 \',\'</ 1_ ..1111 ~ James Scott McKee 834 Pearl Street Eugene, OR 97401 Date ReceIved Planner AL ,r/t/.J-otJJ' I I Qtt--~ " 8 "