The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotes, Meeting PLANNER 1/10/2008 Proposed Property Line Adjustment- Gordon Webb ., llro 1,(' Case No. SUB2008-00008 Date Recelved.~ Staff Report and Notice of Decision Planner: MM Applicant/Owner Gordon Webb 860 Ocean Drive Bandon, OR 97411 Applicant's Representative Olson & Morris 380 Q Street Springfield, OR 97477 541-302-9790 Parcel Acreages Before and After Adjustment Parcell Old= 6.46 ac., New= 15.28 ac. Parcel 2 Old= 167.12ac., New= 158,31ac. Subject F ... .' es (Map No. and Tax Lot) 18-02-09 Portion Tax Lot 100 18-02-10 Portion Tax Lot 100 Zoning Light Medium Industrial Executive Summary Date Received: 1/8/08 Date Accepted as Complete: 1/10/08 Date of the Director's Decision: 2/06/08 Parcel 2~ New = 158.31~ Okt '" 167.12 Old Parcel 1 - ~ Webb Lot Une Adjustment Cl) 200 o 200 400 hel ~--- The applicant y.v,..v.es to use the y.v,..w.;j line adjustment process to relocate a small lot (Parcell) that is adjacent to a larger lot (Parcel 2) to a location north and west of its Webb Property Line Adjustment Case No. SUB2008-00003 January 10, 2008 current locatIOn The property lme adjustment WIll also mcrease the SIze o!l2ltft:RElq?OO'ld 646 acres to 15 28 acres Parcel 2 WIll be reduced from 167 12 acres to 15IRll:nlra@fes~ the adjustment and WIll fill m the area vacated by the relocated Parcel I Parcels I and 2 are adjacent lots wIth a combmed acreage of 173 58 acres WIth the proposed lot lme adjustment, the total acreage remams the same and Parcels I and 2 remam and the resultmg configuratIOn of parcels I and 2 remam wltlun the ongmal footprmt of the two parcels No new lot IS created FIgure 1 Illustrates how the lot Ime adjustment wIll relocate Parcel I tltd()<{ The mtent and results of the proposal were not clear to staff, based on the mltlal submIssIOn Staff met on January 9, 2008 WIth Pam Clark and Larry Olson, of Olson Moms, the planmng surveymg firm hIred to prepare the proposal Ms Clark was able to c1anfy the mtent of the proposal and how the property lme adjustment would move Parcel I from ItS ImtlallocatlOn to a new locatIOn, whIle staymg wlthm the footpnnt of the two ongmal parcels WhIle unusual, usmg the lot lme adjustment procedure m thIS manner IS wlthm accepted professIOnal survey practice Based on a reVIew of the proposed property Ime adjustment usmg the approval cntena for found m SectIOn 516-125 of the Spnngfield Development Code (SDC), staff finds that the proposal IS m complIance wIth applIcable standards The applIcatIon is approved. Procedural ReqUlrernents Property Ime adjustments are a "Type I (Mmlstenal)" process SectIOn 5 1-125 ofthe SDC states that Type I deCISIOns may be made by the DIrector "wIthout publIc notIce and WIthout publIc hearmg" Type I applIcations are to be revIewed for completeness and for conformance WIth the applIcable cntena for approval of the proposal stated m the Development Code Based on the DIrector's reVIew, a deCISIOn IS Issued, whIch IS the final deCISIOn of the CIty Staff has revIewed the applIcant's submIttal for completeness reqUIrements found m SectIOn 516-120 of the SDC Staff found the applIcant's submISSIOn complete on January 18, 2007 CIty Surveyor's Comments GIven the unusual nature of the property Ime adjustment, staff requested that the City Surveyor revIew the proposed action for accuracy and consIstency WIth accepted survey practice The CIty Surveyor, havmg revIewed the proposed property lme adjustment survey, has made the followmg recommendatIOns I) Insert a survey narrative on the face ofthe map or as an attachment as per ORS 209250 (I) and (2) If the narrative IS a separate document, the map and narrative must be referenced to each other In response, the applIcant added a narrative and resubmItted the survey map on 1/18/2008 Webb Property Lme Adjustment Case No SUB2008-00003 January la, 2008 2 2) Place pms on the corners to provIde monumentatlOn Tlus IS a recommendatIOn and IS not a reoUlrement or conditIOn of anDfoval In response, the apphcant's surveyor r L" mdlcated that pms Will be placed Date Received lio nO Planner MM ( ," Cntena for Approval SectIOn 5 16-125 of the SDC hsts the cntena to be used for approvmg a property hne adjustment The code sectIOn states that property lme adjustment shall not A Create a new lot/parcel, B Create a landlocked lot/parcel, C Reduce an eXlstmg lot/parcel below the mlrumum size standard or reduce setbacks below the mmlmum estabhshed by the apphcable zorung dlstncts m thiS Code, D VIOlate any prevIOus conditIOns the Approval Authonty may have Imposed on the lots/parcels mvolved m the apphcatlOn E Detnmentally alter the avmlablhty of eXlstmg pubhc and/or pnvate ulihtles to each lot/parcel m the apphcatlOn or to abuttmg lots/parcels, or F Increase the degree of non-confonmty of each lot, parcel, or structure that IS non- confonmng at the lime of apphcatlOn The seclion below evaluates the proposed property lme adjustment agamst the approval cntena Shall not". A, Create a new lot/parcel, Fmdmg 1 The proposal does not create a new parcel Parcell moves to an area north and west of ItS current locatIOn and mcreases m Size Parcel 2 decreases m sIze and fills the area vacated by the relocatIOn of Parcel I B, Create a landlocked lot/parcel; Fmdmg 2 The proposed Ime adjustment creates opporturuty for both Parcel I and Parcel 2 to access the new Bob Straub Parkway The proposal does not create a landlocked parcel C. Reduce an exlStmg lot/parcel below the mmtmum sIze standard or reduce setbacks below the mtmmum establlshed by the appllcable zoning dtstTlcts m tIllS Code; Findmg 3 The zorung for both Parcel I and Parcel 2 IS Light MedIUm Industnal (LMI) Findmg 4 SectIOn 32-420 of the SDC shows the mlrumum lot size m LMI zones to be 10,000 square feet ( 44 acres) Webb Property Lme Adjustment Case No SUB2008-00003 January 10, 2008 3 Fmdmg 5 The property lme adjustment will result m Parcell bemg 15 28 acres m size it!7 I { Parcel 2 will be 158 31 acres m SIze Date Received. () / tJ Planner. MM Fmdmg 6 Both Parcell and Parcel 2 will be larger than 44 acres, under the proposed property lme adjustment D. VIOlate any previous condttlOns the Approval Authorrty may have imposed on the lots/parcels involved m the appltcatlOn; Fmdmg 7 A review of a current title report Issued by Cascade Title Company on the subject parcels shows that no known conditIOns have been Imposed by the City of Spnngfield, Lane County, or any other authonty E. Detrimentally alter the aVallablltty of existmg publtc and/or prtvate uttlltles to each lot/parcel in the appltcatlOn or to abutting lots/parcels; or Fmdmg 8 Utilities can be made aVailable to the parcels m the future, but at present, only a small farm house on Parcel 2 IS served by utilities (eleclnclty and telephone) SUB Will provide water and EPUD Will supply electnclty The property lme adjustment does not prevent the extensIOn of services to other parcels F, Increase the degree of non-conformity of each lot, parcel, or structure that IS non- conformmg at the time of appltcation. Fmdmg 9 Both Parcell and Parcel 2 conform with eXlstmg zomng standards for the LMI zone, and Will contmue to do so If the property lme adjustment IS approved The farm house located on Parcel 2 IS a contmumg non-conformmg use that will contmue but not be expanded by approval of the property lme adjustment ConclusIOn and DecIsIOn of the DIrector The findmgs of fact with respect to the stated cntena for approval demonstrate that the proposed property line adjustment IS consistent With those cntena The proposed property hne adjustment IS approved, Webb Property Line Adjustment Case No SUB2008-00003 January 10, 2008 4