The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence PLANNER 2/8/2007 c Page 1 of2 )t 1 L l ~ , " , 5 (-'.. 't_ -----;{ ,- _" LAFLEUR Karen From Brad Smith [brad_smlth@GRAA com] Sent Thursday, February 08, 2007 8 31 AM To KORTH Steve (SMTP), Amster, Glenn Cc Cannard. Bnan, alan evans, James W Splckerman. LAFLEUR Karen. METZGER Mark Subject. RE Spnngfield, Oregon- Mohawk Center Hello Mark and Karen, Following are five questions for the Development Issues Meeting on March 1 st 1 Does the proposed bUilding and site plan adequately meet fire protection requirements/setbacks? 2 Does the bUilding onentatlon shown on the site plan meet the City Code reqUirements? 3 Does the site plan show adequate parking to meet the City Code reqUirements? 4 What drainage analYSIS IS reqUired for thiS project and what drainage master plan would faCilitate that analYSIS? 5 Does the site plan meet the City'S development code requirements and,lf not, what Inconsistencies eXist? Thank you for your assistance In setting thiS meeting and please let me know If we can proVide any additional information at thiS time Respectfully, Brad Smith Galloway, Romero & ASSOCiates 5350 DTC Parkway Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 Phone 303-770-8884 Fax 303-770-3636 E-mail brad_smlth@graacom www gallowayromero com From Steve Korth [mallto steve@oakwaycenter com] Sent. Wednesday, February 07, 2007 6 12 PM To: Brad Smith, 'Amster, Glenn' Cc: 'Cannard, Bnan', 'alan evans', 'James W Splckennan', 'LAFLEUR Karen', 'MffiGER Mark' Sublect: Spnngfield, Oregon- Mohawk Center Brad- Glenn- I Just wanted to remind you guys to please submit. via emall to Mark and Karen, the "5 questions" for the DIM meeting by Thursday They need those questions In order to dlstnbute thOO!W~~'ei were submitted last week In order to keep the March 1st meehng date PI elved anner MM thanks In advance <Jj~ Ivt , / 2/8/2007 ~ ,,'\ "~I BIZI G",-, ~/ t$ ~OT/::;- S' ZON2007-00006 (c.op'/{ ':!!:::! GI ",",")'\,) Development Issues Meeting - McKay Investment Company If') APft I AIJI \ Proposed Development of 131,000 fe Retail BUilding on 11 15 Acre Parcel - c-- ) Located at NE Corner of Mohawk Boulevard and Centennial Boulevard ,- Q1 Does the proposed bUilding and site plan adequately meet fire protection requirements/setbacks? A Fire and Life Safety to comment Q2 Does the bUilding Orientation shown on the site plan meet the City Code requirements? A No In accordance with the Nodal Development Overlay Dlstnct (NDO) 41 040(3)(a), the parking, dnvlng and maneuvenng areas are to be placed at the rear or Side of the bUilding when It abuts a street (In thiS case, Centennial and Mohawk are the pnmary streets) BUildings are to be set back no more than 20 feet from the street In accordance with NDO 41 040(2)(a) If the site IS determined to have Major Retail Commercial zoning, the bUilding setback must be at least 10 feet from property line, and parklng/dnveway setbacks must be at least 5 feet from property line The property does not directly abut any residential dlstncts to the north, therefore solar access standards would not apply It IS known that eXisting site contamination and monltonng wells Will reqUire careful bUilding placement The assessment of eXisting conditions plan prepared for a site plan review application must show the layout of bUildings and other features eXisting on the site (Including the mOnltonng wells) It should be noted the bUilding cannot encroach over any easements Q3 Does the sIte plan show adequate parking to meet the City Code requirements? A ThiS depends on the final zOning determined for the site A parking generation study In support of the proposal IS recommended The proposed site does not meet the parking requirements for standard retail commercial (1/300 ft2 of gross floor area) However, the site exceeds the reqUired parking for warehouse commercial (1/600 ft2 gross floor area) The site IS currently within a Mixed Use Commercial (MUC) zone and IS within a Nodal Development Overlay Dlstnct (NDO) In accordance with SDC 40070(1)(a)2, the maximum parking provided cannot exceed 120% of the minimum parking requirement for commercial development The shared parking arrangements with the adjacent commercial bUildings on Tax Lots 3901 and 4402 must be reconciled at the time of Site Plan Review for the development proposal As an example, there IS a parking area easement In favor of Tax Lot 4402 recorded against a portion of the southwest comer of the subject property (Reception No 98548, Lane County Records) On the other hand, no Date Received Planner MM '1/1/ tfJ t7 , formal parking arrangement (such as a recorded easement or shared parking agreement) IS eVident for the eXisting bank on Tax Lot 3901 Parking spaces Will have to remain available at all times of the business day and throughout the entire calendar year In order to be attnbuted to the parking requirement for thiS site Seasonal use of surplus parking spaces for dnve-through corrals would have to be supported by a parking analysIs 04 What drainage analysIs IS required for this project and what drainage master plan would facIlitate that analysIs? A Comprehensive site stormwater management plan required Englneenng to provide comment Public Works 05 Does the site plan meet the City's development code requirements and, If not, what inCOnsistencies exist? A No . Proposal IS not consistent with the eXisting zoning dlstnct The applicant's Measure 37 claim must be adjudicated before any site plan application can be approved . No Information provided on eXisting site conditions The eXisting legal lot lines and all easement Information shall be shown on the site plan map . No apparent enhanced pedestnan facilities are provided In accordance With SDC 40 and 41 . No bicycle parking shown . Proposed "stormwater pond" may not meet City standards, and overall vegetative stormwater treatment area may be insuffiCient A portion of the proposed water quality swale appears to be Within a public utility easement Show how rooftop drainage from proposed bUilding IS being handled . Site IS Within the 1-5 year Time of Travel Zone, and therefore Will be subject to stnngent Dnnklng Water Protection (DWP) Overlay Dlstnct regulations In accordance With SDC Article 17 A DWP application Will be reqUired Products containing or qualifying as Dense Non-Aqueous Phase LiqUids (DNAPLs) are prohibited, and full containment of other potentially hazardous matenals Will be reqUired inSide the store Additionally, outdoor storage of landscaping matenals such as fertilizers, mulch and treated wood may be prohibited or require secondary containment . Underground contamination and mOnltonng wells eXist on Site, and Will have to be accommodated Within the proposed development Additionally, there may be special protection/mitigatiOn measures reqUired for the bUilding slab . Landscaping plan not provided, and area dedicated to landscaping may be Insufficient . Full size bUilding elevation drawings reqUired . No outdoor garbage enclosure apparent . Outdoor displays and storage must be screened from View, espeCially for areas adjacent to residential dlstncts ~ate ReceIved !l ! r!i> 7 tanner MM - . Site does not meet 04 FAR standards of SDC 41 040(1 )(b), unless MRC zoning IS applied and NDO Dlstnct IS removed . Proposal greatly exceeds maximum bUilding footpnnt area descnbed In SDC 40 11 O( 1 )(b), unless MUC zoning IS removed . Traffic study likely Will be required to support all-turns access proposed along south boundary of site . Awkward Internal Intersection Just Inside the entrance from Mohawk Blvd . Information on matenals and elevation details for proposed screening wall req u I red . Proposed parking lot changes at the southwest corner of the site appear to change the access and parking configuration for the eXisting Wells Fargo bank I 1_fA:u;~,v <,rut>... fl:.t.CIJI<-<.....EWP?D L -fYChN'd(df'-W~"4_::ifht47) - au A-.</Uf#'(rf'MO.ll?; I lAKe :z<. ( >P.k6 fa 1-rM tJ:.. , l'IW0I'dRt:~.rtn./"'- vfuJ J:rllJ>t" fa Pf lisuE f./ff70r t/t.., I ~ -. fr1 3'1 : WIII/:t-I uk/-- W't f~~{!;ffJut-t';v", ~ t:E'r/fFW? I -1 , I HI t;, '-- - , (7SU~ I , I , n"Ite.Rc"",/vea ~ Planner I."., ~ , ,