The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPacket, DIM CMO 5/15/2008 ~'; it Y 0 f S P r i n 9 fie I d _~25 Fifth Street :: ::;rlngfleld, Oregon ='L77 SPRINGFIELD . '-one 541-726-3753 541-726-3689 ., -- c/'\ Date: w~@~om~0 J~ MAY 1 I) 2008 j Bill To: 1Jp~ ~ ,~~\- . - Ship To: By zotJ2ooB- 00021-" ~ 19""7~ 'Ie.. ~~ Total Due -if;) ;)...00 I MAY - 6 2008 City of Sprln;Jfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIMi}mal Submitt". Date Received' . -. I. it< '.,,' ~ ; Prospective Applicant Name: RoyGray Company: 8587Skylme Estates, LLC By Address: POBox I17, Walterville, OR ~/4o~ I I Prospective Applicant's Rep.: MIchael Lane Branch, P E MAY 1 fi 2008 Phone: 915-8587 I Fax: . . I Phone: 746-0637 I Fax: 745-0389 Skylme Estates, LLC I Phone: IFax: j J J I j J Company: Address: Branch Engmeenng, Inc 310 FIfth Street, Spnngfie1d, OR I I Property Owner: Icompany: IAddress: I Rov Gray PO BOA I17, WaltervIlle, OR 97489 IASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-02-02/ 18-02-02-24 I Property Address: N/A I Size of Property: Total Site = 25 64 . Development Area = 5 6 I I Description of If you are filling In thiS for, m by hand, please attach your proposal-descrlptlon to thiS application Proposal: To create 45 lots adhenn,~ to cluster subdlVlslOn standards I Existing Use: Vacant 1# of Lots/Parcels: 4~- I ITA)( LOT NO(S): 500and600/1600and1800 Acres ~ Sauare Feet [l lAva, Lot/Parcel Size: 5378 sf I Density: 8 du/acre Prospective g . ~ l\ Applicant: ~~ Srg-natur ..... Date: S:k/ dff Print ~"'~'::n-'I';;r!lTiO".'f'r:q1;,,;,~~r~~{~";117j~~1 ~--~..........;).",.;:r;,1,A"1.:."H",~Uttl.~',~*-___.._~ Case No.:7 ()/l)..flYt -()YJJ-L{ Date: S/{j) / () ( Reviewed by: i t11tC...,.' Technical Fee:'~~ I Ipostaae Fee: $0 I PROJECT NUMBER: PRS2.cJ::jp- CX050 00 Application Fee: $ 50(0- TOTAL FEES: $ 500"" I " , ., ~~ ,~ ~ . , -, , ~" .. . , ReVised 1/1/08 Molly Markanan . 1 of 3 DE\! ELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD CITY HALL 225 I'll' 1 L1 STREET DSD Conference Room 616 Meeting Date: June 5, 2008 @ 1:30 - 2:30 p.m.. 1 DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING #ZON2008-00024 GRAY/SKYLINE ESTATES Assessor's Map 18-02-02-00 TL 500, 600 Assessor's Map 18-02-02-24 TL 1600, 1800 Address Vacant - So portion of South 71 st Street Existing Use Vacant Applicant submitted plans to discuss creating a 45-101 cluster subdiVIsion, 10 be known as Skyline Estates Planner Mark Metzger ~~@~DW~' m MAY 152008 ~ By '. '}'i' 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (541) 726-3753 FAX (541) 726-3689 WWWCf spnngfield or us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT May 7, 2008 Roy Gray SkylIne Estates, LLC PO Box 117 Walterville, OR 97489 RE ZON2008-00024 (18-02-02-00 TL 500, 600 & 18-02-02-24 TL 1600, 1800) Development Issues Meetrng - Applicant subrmtted plans to dtscuss creatrng a 45-lot cluster subdtvlSlon, SkylIne Estates subdiVISIOn. Dear Mr Gray" Thank you for your Development Issues Meetrng subrmttal. The followmg meeting has been scheduled. TYPE: DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING PLACE: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT CONFERENCE ROOM 616 225 J.'ll'.ln STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 'I' DATEfTIME: Thursday, June 5, 2008 at 1:30 - 2:30 p.m. CONTACT PERSON: Mark Metzger If you have any questlons, please call me at 541-726-3775 Smcerely, - ",'~\'iJ~\\\'1 ~;<: '" b \ \. m- MA1 1 5 200B '~-'., ---=--- I B- Mark Metzger Urban Planning CC MIchael Lane Branch, P E Branch Engmeenng 310 Frll:h Street Spnngfielcl, OR 97477 .. Date Received. SkylIne Estates Development Issues Meetmg (DIM) QuestlOllS May 6, 2008 MAY - 6 2008 Onglnal SubmlW>1 Bacbrround The development sIte consIsts of four tax lots tOlalmg approxImately 256 acres Tax Map I 8-02-02, Tax Lots 500 & pOO, and Map 18-02-02-24, Lots 1600 & 1800 Ta, Lots 600 and 1600 front 71" Street near It'S convergence WIth JessIca Lane The CIty LimIt boundary dlVldes Tax Lot 500 The proposed subdlVlslOn will be entlfely WIthm the CIty LlfDlts The development site can be descnbed as havmg slopes from under 15% to over 60'J'c The proposed layout was conceIved With the overall mtent to preserve steep slopes and mamtam the qualIty aesthetIC charactenstIcs of the Hill sIde Development Overlay Dlstnct To aclueve thl;, a cluster subdIviSIOn IS belllg proposed utllIzlllg the hIllsIde transfer method for calculatmg denSIty In January 2007, a cluster subdiVISIon applIcatIon for Skylllle Estates was submitted to the CIty The pre-applIcatIOn meetlllg was held on January 12 2007 for the subdIVISIOn (CIty File # PRE2007-00001l PR12006-00056) The development plan and layout has changed slgruficantly from the prevIous TentatIve SubdIVISIOn Plan Therefore, we are startmg anew WIth the tentatIve subdIVISIon applIcatIon process Questions Certalll engllleermg challenges are present With the development, some of whIch we have questIOns Fife! TransportatIon- 1 Access to the proposed subdlvIslOn Will be VIa a Jomt access easement There are no publIc roadway unprovements proposed V'.Ith thIs subdlvlslOn -The mam access and spurs for the subdlvlslOn will be tlliough a JOlllt access easement They WIll have a maximum of 18% grade The malll access Will have a total paved WIdth of21 feet WIth a five foot Wide Sidewalk (6" thIck) This WIdth WIll taper doWll to 15 feet at the turnaround loop on the southern portIOn of the subdlVlslOn Both of the spurs will have a paved WIdth of 15 feet as well With a 5' WIde curbSide sldeV'.alk on one SIde of the proposed access for mternal pedestnan clfculatIon All proposed vehIcular surfaces WIll meet fue "ehIcle load requlfements Where the roadway WIdth IS less then 20 feet the SIdewalk Will also meet the load reqUIrement We are proposmg rolled curb as to allow emergency \ ehIcles to maneuver on SideV'. alk If needed No parklllg \\ III be allowed on any of the proposed roadw.lYs All parkmg Will eIther be mcorporated wlthm the reSIdentIal uruts' architectural deSIgn or ill paved areas speCIfically deSignated for parkmg MUlliClpal water IS avaIlable from the SUB water mam on 71' Street In order to proVIde adequate watel pressure for domesl!c use and fife protectJon, d pump Date Received: MAY - 6 2008 statIOn will be mstalled at the base of the subdlVlsIOn neDI19.It'~P~ hydrants will be mstalled as needed through out the subdIvIsIon, and minImum of 1000 gal/mm of fIre flow IS proposed AdditIOnally, a spnnkIer system will be mstalled wIthm each dwellmg umt ThIS requirement will be recorded on the fmal plat No secondary fire access IS proposed WIth the subdIvlSlon Does the FIre Department see a problem With thIS fIre protectIon strategy or access layout, wIdth and gradmg? Does TransportatIOn have any comment, WIth the access layout? Pubhc Works- 2 The eXlstmg dramage pattern flows m such a way that the maJonty of runoff IS dIrected to a ravme Situated on the nortltwest portIOn of the development SIte Our dramage proposal mtends to emulate the eXIstmg dramage pattern as much as practIcal There]s an ex]stmg roadSIde ditch along 71 st Street and a 15 Inch diameter stormwater mam stubbed to the bottom of the mentIOned ravme We mtend to route all rooftop and paved surface runoff to the proposed gutters and mlets wIthm the mam road of the subdIvlSlon All the runoff WIll then be conveyed to surface the ground Just west of proposed Lot I at the 10catIoI1 of the eXIstmg ravme Check dams WIll be constructed to slow the velocItIes, and mIDlffi1ze erOSIOn An area dram/ mlet will be mstalled at the base of the ravme which Will connect to the eXIstmg IS" stormwater mam m 7lst Street Does the City have comments on thIS dramage strategy? PublIc Works- 3 There IS an eXIstmg 8" sarutary sewer mam that teImIDates at a cleanout frontmg Tax Lot 2100 There IS also an eXIstIDg 8" sarutary sewer mam that termmates at a manhole frontIng Tax Lot 300 (approXImately 145 feet west of the SIte on JessIca Dnve) The proposal wouldinclude extendmg one of these lmes to the subdIVISIOn entrance and constructmg a publIc sewer servIce lme along the proposed maID road of the subdlvlSlon AU lots WIll be provIded WIth access to CIty sarutary servIces Power, cable TV, and commumcatIOns are also avaIlable to the site m 71 st Street frontIng the SIte Pubhc UtIlIty Easements 'Mil be establIshed to faclhtate access to mamtam all publIc utilItIes Would PublIc Works comment on thIS proposal? Plannmg - 4 We have calculated the denSIty of the subdIvlSlon per 3 3-520B, whIch states that a combmatIon of OptIon -'\" - Average Slope - Mmlmum Lot/Parcel SIze, and OptIon "B ' - DensIty Transfer Bones, can be used We used both OptIon 'A" and "B . to compute the maxImum denSIty or umts per acre Please see the attached denSIty calculatIOns for detaIls The resultmg densIty fO! thIS subdiVISIon equated to 45 dwellmg umts for the development area, which meets the maxunum denSIty of 8 umts per acre for hIllSIde development transfer Would the CIty Plannmg comment on thIS density evaluatIon? There are two port lOllS of the total de~ elopment site that the developer would lIke to sectIOn off, apart from the proposed subdivIsIOn SpecIfically, a five acre portIOn of Tax Lot 500 on the southeast corner of the sIte, and a one acre portIOn of Tax Lot 1600 frontmg 71 5t Street What would be the recommended process to achIeve thIS III the most tIme effiCIent and streamlme manner? Should we partItIon the land pnor to proceedmg with thIS subdIvISIOn applIcatIon, or could we accomplIsh thIS separatIOn through the subdl~lslOn plat? Planmng - 5 The eXlstmg folIage on the undeveloped sIte can be desenbed as wooded Trees WIll only be removed If they are WIthIll the aceess way, cut! fill areas, or bmldmg sIte All other tlees outsIde of the development area WIll remam We Will submIt a Tree Fellmg Permit applIcatIon With the TentatIve SubdlVlsIOn applIcatlon We Will subnnt a tree protectIOn plan mcorporatmg a plOcedure for tree removal wIthm the access way, cut/ fill areas, and bmldmg SItes or envelopes Because of the quantity of trees on the slte and the grade of the land, we would lIke to request an exceptIon to showmg on the tree fellmg plot plan the locatlOn, sIze and species of each tree to be removed Instead, we v.11I provide an estImated amount of tIees that WIll be removed III each area (access v.ay, cut/fill, and bmldmg envelope) Would Plmmmg respond to thiS request? Date ReceIVed MAY - 6 2008 Onglnal subrl'1ltta\ '. ... OptIon "8" portion ofthe site: Total area. 4 1 ac. Slope Breakdown I Slope Range Average Slope I Square Feet 1<15% 10SF 115%-25% I 9759 SF 125%-35% 1359% 167,275 SF 1>35% 1103,021 SF I Bonus Transfer for Option "B" (4x1.2) CalculatIOn for average slope above 15% I Allowable Units I 0 Umts I I (total 180,055 SF) 4 umts I 4 UOlts I (0 00229)(contour mterval)(total contour lemrth) = Average Slope (area m acres) (000229)(10)(6430) = 359% (4 I) Total number ofuoits for Option "A" and Option "B" OptIon "A" = 41 Umts OptIon "B" = 4 Umts TOTAL = 45 UNITS (See Fig 3 for illustration) Date Received MAY - 6 2008 Onglnal Submittal ~ 2 EXISTING SITE CONDmONS ThIs 25 ac. SIte IS located on Tax Map 18-02-02, Tax Lots 600 & 500 and Tax Map 18- 02-02-24, Tax Lots 1600 & 1800 (see attached Fig 1) The property IS vacant and located WIthIn LDR & HIllSIde Development Overlay zoning Slopes range from under 15% to over 60%, ilie elevations are from 820' to I 180' and the SIte is mostly wooded ANALYSIS PROCEDURE As outlmed m Spnngfield Development Code Sec 3 3-520, a combmatlon of Option "A" (Average Slope - Mmimum Lot/Parcel SIZe) and Option "B" (DensIty Transfer Bonus) were used to calculate allowable densIty Density cannot exceed 8 umts/developable acre The developable area IS 5 6 ac allowmg a maxrmum of 45 umts (see FIg 2) Table used to determine allowable number ofumts WIthIn each slope range I <15-25% I 25%-35% 1>35% 10,000 SFlUmt 20,000 SFlUmt 40,000 SFlUmt OptIOn "A" portion of the site: Total area 15.0 ac Slope breakdown I Slope Range Average Slope 1<15% /15%-35% 24.7% I >35% I - I Total for Option "A" Square Feet 44,296 SF 303,596 SF . 306,289 SF Allowable Units 4 Umts 30 Umts 7 Units 41 Units Calclliatlon for average slope WIthm 15%-25% slope range (0 00229)(contour mterval)(total contour length) = Average Slope (area In acres) (Q 00229)(10)(7550) = 247% (70) Date ReceIVed MAY - 6 2008 Onglnal submIttal I DEVELOPMENT SCALE 1"=200' PLAN ~ ---- --- :::;:::;. ---- ,.. . "'" Date R ... .. , . ..-.., .... .. ecelved'.'.... . ..., MAY - 6 2008 Ongmal Submittal FIG ;:> . ,.." DENSITY CALCULATION AND SLOPE MAP SCALE 1"=200' ---- ' ~ ------- ..--:; . :::::::: , " SLOPES Date Received ({51 - 1< _;c'~ "'l ~ - 1 ' 'I ' " ~4 ~')..,",'::' r~, MAY - 6 2008 151 - 251 251 - 351 >351 Onglnal Submltt;>1 FIG. 3 . . Development Issues Meeting,Submittal Requirements Checklist ~ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula A copy of the fee schedule IS available at the Development Services Department The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal !ZJ Development Issues Meeting Application Form !ZJ Five (S) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer dUring the meeting So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list IS limited to five questions !ZJ Ten (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal IS listed below It IS not necessary to Include all of these Items on the site or plot plan However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of Information that Will be derived from the meeting IS commensurate with the level of detail provided In the application Applicants are also encouraged to Include additional information on the plan as listed In the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5 12-120, Land DIVISIOns - PartitIOns & SubdivIsions - Tentative Plan Submittal ReqUirements or 517-120, Site Plan ReView Submittal ReqUirements ~ Drawn In Ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" !ZJ Scale appropriate to the area Involved and suffiCient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' !ZJ North arrow !ZJ Date of preparation !ZJ Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number ~ DimenSions (In feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area ~ Location and size of eXisting and proposed utilities, including connection pOints [gj On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch baSinS, dry wells, and natural dralnageways to be retained ~ Area and dimenSions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land DIVISions ~ ApproXimate location, number and dimenSions of proposed lots ~ How streets In the proposal area connect With eXisting streets DIMs Related to Site Plan ReView o Proposed and eXisting bUildings location, dimenSIOns, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between bUildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for bUildings, st~tIil~,~~~ys, Sidewalks, patios and other ImperviOUS surfaces Parking and Circulation plan MAY - 6 2008 o o Onglnal Submittal ReVised 1/1/0& Molly Markarian " 3 of 3