Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DIM APPLICANT 5/7/2008 SPRINGFIEA City of Spnngfield Development ServIces Department 225 Fifth Street Spnngfield OR 97477 Phone (541) 726-3759 FaA (541) 726-3689 Development Issues Meeting Prospective Apphcanfs Name Wlllamalane Park and Recreatlon Dlstrlct Address 250 S 32nd St, Sprlngfleld OR 97478-6302 ~-J ~ 'M~ - '115.7385 ~,'1\'I.'~)_:tr"fo.otl .J~ l/'O e 8rDo.J..u>'M/ (J I e~ O~ '1740 Propelty Ownel Name Wlllamalane Park and Recreatlon Address 250 S 32nd St, Spnngheld OR 97478-6302 Phone (541) 736-4055 Dlstrlct - ~ ~ iJ l! Phone (541) 736-4055 Property Address MultlP!e - See Attached Statement Assessor's Map No Multlple - See Attached Tax Lot No Multlple - See Attached SIze of PlOperty Square Feet or See Attached Statement Acres Ex!stll1g Use of Property Park and RecreatloD, Open Space, Quarry and M1ne Operatlons DeSCrIption of Proposal Wlllamalane ("the appl1.cant") 15 conductlng prelJ.mlnary feaSlblll.ty analYSIS for a multI-use transportatIon enhancement proJect to occur between DorrIS Ranch LIVIng HIstory Farm and Clearwater Park The 4 mIle long multI-use path IS proposed to be constructed along the north bank of the MIddle Fork WIllamette RIver The MIddle Fork WIllamette RIver Loop Path IS Included as a prIorIty proJect In the 2004 Park and RecreatIon ComprehenSIve Plan adopted by WIllamalane, the CIty of SprIngfIeld, and Lane County WIthIn CIty of Sprlnqfleld lurlsdlctlon no~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ :~p proposed on property zoned PublIC Land and Open Space (PLO) and Quarry and MIne OperatIons (QMO) The applIcant seeks to ldentlfy all neceS~Y/lan~:s: app;ovals Applicant SIgnature '-f/o:::r d./""""",,,,~ the proJect WIll need to obtaIn Date S/7/07 ( I For Office Use Only' JOlllnal No _h2ou~ -~3c> Received By +'1<'-- c:/ U'-03-0l-00-tL. 1100 3100, ~IOJ \"6-o'3dl.00 "11- ~oo As>c,sor s IVIap No I e.-o~-oz.-ootL. 1.00. Ko'2. Tax Lot No L8-o~ 1'1:00 ll.... LBcr:l Date Accepted as Complete 8/20/03 1 THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING The purpose of a Development Issues Meetmg IS to give an apphcant the opportUl1lty to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City The discussIOn can be general or specific depending on the details provided with the applIcation The applicant's proposal IS circulated to the relevant staff The planner will schedule a one to two hour meeting between the applIcant and staff wlthm two to four weeks Staft attendmg the meetmg will be prepared to discuss the Issues raised m the submittal by the applIcant Other Issues raised dunng the meetmg may also be discussed However the meetmg Will be mformal and the City will Issue no staff report A Development Issues Meetmg provides mformatlOn to an applicant related to the current development conditIOns and standards ofthe City The Development Issues Meetmg IS not a land use decIsIOn and does not confel any development nghts, establIsh any conditIOns or bmd the applIcant or the City to any course ot actIOn The meetmg conveys the status of known development opportunities and constramts The status may change over time as development conditIOns or standards change AN APPLICATION PACKET CONSISTS OF: I Ten copies of the proposed Site Plan Suggested mfonnatIon valuable for staff to reVIeW the proposal IS lIsted below It IS not necessary to mclude all of these Items on the plot plan, however, applIcants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of mformatlon that Will be denved from the meetmg IS commensurate With the level of detail provided m the applIcatIOn 2 ApplIcant' are also encouraged to mclude additIOnal mformatlOn on the site or plot plan as listed m the Sprmgfield Development Code (SDC) Article 3 I SlIe Plan Review Standards subsectIOns 3 I 050 or Article 35 SubdlVlslOn Standards subsectIOn 35 040 3 A list of speCific questIOns the applIcant would lIke staff to answer dunng the meetmg So that each question I1ldY be fully evaluated, the lIst us lImited to five questIOns 4 The application fee Refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropnate fee A Copy of the Fee Schedule IS available at the Development Services Department 8/20/03 2 I~ CAMERON McCARTHY GILB~RI SClI~IB~ I ANDSCAPF ARCHITECTS LLP 8 "'~..., .. 160 La~l Hrnau\\.IY r Ub~nl-Orl-b()n 97401 1\..1 'i4i 4X'i 71b1 lax 'i414!-.'i71S9 WWW L m b ~ Lorn TO City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Spnngfleld OR 97477 TRANSMITTED Herewith Separate Cover By Carner Other COPIES ITEM '" 1 1 10 Spnngfleld DIM Form Springfield DIM Statement Middle Fork Poth - Site Plan REMARKS None COPIES TO 'V Owner Architect '" File Electrical Civil Contractor DATE PROJECT PROJ ECT No DISPOSITION Signed For Informotlon For Reply For Approval TRANSMITTAL May 7 2007 Middle Fork Wlllamette River Loop Path 0628G '" DATED No PAGES 5/07/07 5/07/07 5/04/07 2 2 I BY~\ Colin G McArthur I~ CAMERON Mt.CARTHY GILB~,R I ,ClI ~I B Ie LA]'>.D~c..APF ARCHITEt. TS III' (i '-q"," 160 I a,[ Broadw.1} I lIbllll Orq,on 97401 III ~41 4h~ 71b) la\ )414b)7lB'J www C III b ~ LOIll M E M 0 RAN DUM TO City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 FROM Colin McArthur cc Fred Wilier Pat French Rebecca Gershow Greg Hyde DATE May 7, 2007 REGARDING Middle Fork Willamette River loop Path, Springfield DIM Statement INTRODUCTION This statement contains location mformatlon and specific land use questions associated with the proposed Middle Fork Wlllamette River loop Path project LOCATION The following table Identifies assessor's map number, tax lot, zone, Size, and site address for parcels assoCiated with the proposed project 18031200 118031100 I 18030200 . I 18030200 I 18030100 I 18030100 I 18030100 QUARRY & MINE OPERATIONS PUBLIC LAND & OPEN SPACE QUARRY & MINE OPERATIONS PUBLIC LAND & OPEN SPACE QUARRY & MINE OPERATIONS PU8L1C LAND & OPEN SPACE PUBLIC LAND & OPEN SPACE 3 17 7507 4205 177 81 780 DORRIS ST 30 I 28 795 S 28TH ST 258 4673 SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING (DIM) QUESTIONS 1) The proposed alignment crosses three tax lots (18-03-01-00.01100, 18-03-02-00-00600, 18-03- 12-00500) zoned QMO - Quarry and Mine Operations by the Springfield Development Code and deSignated Sand and Gravel (SG) by the Metro Plan low Impact publiC facilities are permitted In the QMO zone under SDC 24 030(8) Similar uses may be permitted at the discretion of the Director A "low Impact" facility IS defined In SDC Article 2 as "any publiC or semi-public facility that has minimal olfactory, visual, or auditory Impacts" The preface to the schedule of use categories In 24 030 states that permitted uses are subject to the provIsions of a Reclamallon Permit Issued by ODGMI Does thiS apply to the proposed path' Ifso, does thiS refer to a ReclamatIon Permit already Issued to the property owner' Does the proposed path project meet the definition of a low Impact public faCIlity and/or similar use and will It be permitted In the QMO zone Without necessitating a zone change/plan amendment and/or ReclamatIon PermIt' 2) The proposed alignment crosses tax lots zoned PlO - Public land and Open Space by the Springfield Development Code and deSignated Parks and Open Space by the Metro Plan SDC 23 020(3)(a) permits publiC and private park and recreallon facilities In the PlO zone as a Middle Fork Wtllamette River Loop Path, Spnngfleld DIM Statement 2 permitted use or a speCial use SDC 23 020(4Hh) permits low Impact public facilities as a permitted use All uses are subject to Site Plan Review unless specifically exempted elsewhere In the SDC Is the proposed pathway and trailhead specifically exempted elsewhere' How will the project be evaluated under the schedule of uses (23 020), and what procedure WIll It be processed under' 3) Adjacent to the Middle Fork of the Willamette River the riparian area boundary IS 7S feet upland from the top of bank (SDC 31 240(1 Ha) Pedestrian paths and bikeways are Permitted Uses In Riparian Areas under SDC 31 240(f) and (g) Within thIS area paths and bikeways "shall be located along the outer edge ofthe required riparian area away from the watercourse" Portions of the path are proposed to be within the riparian setback Because of steep slopes, natural breaks In riparian vegetation, engineering conditions etc, the proposed path cannot always be located on "the outer edge of the riparian area" Are there any ISsues with the proposed path alignment as shown and Will any additional crrterra apply If the path IS not exactly located on the outer edge of the riparian area? 4) Will a Floodplain Development Permit be required for portions of the path proposed within the Floodplain and Will a Greenway Development Permit be required for portions ofthe path within the Greenway' Are there any key ISsues not already dIScussed that we Will need to address to obtain these approvals' 5) OutSide of Site Plan Review, Floodplain, and Greenway requirements are there any additional approvals the project Will need to obtain' Are there other standards the project Will need to address (I e engineering and storm water standards) or other ISsues our applications Will need to address' What are the fees for these applications, what IS the tlmeframe for review/approval, and can the applications be processed concurrently' How should we coordinate these applications with Corps/DSL applications' May 7, 2007 CMGS , ZON2oo7-()0030 Developmenllssues Mtg - Willamalane Pari< 1803010001100.3100.3101 180311000050O 180302000060O.802 1803120001800 Streets . 1-' Springfield Streets - Tooltip is Street Name Tax Lots - Tooltip is Maplot Major Water Features by Type - Tooltip is Featu... I-I Snringfield City Limits - - !..""J3PR iill:m E'!.lIene City limits -,- !illllreUG Springfield UGB -- iilli !Bi' -:- SCALE 1 : 21,643 ~ 1.000 o 1.000 FEET 2.000 3.000 http://spintranetlmg_mwf/spr_main_tide_83.mwf __ T N A Tuesday, May 08, 2007 1 :42 PM