HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DIM APPLICANT 5/7/2008
SPRINGFIEA
City of Spnngfield
Development ServIces Department
225 Fifth Street
Spnngfield OR 97477
Phone (541) 726-3759
FaA (541) 726-3689
Development Issues Meeting
Prospective Apphcanfs Name Wlllamalane Park and Recreatlon Dlstrlct
Address 250 S 32nd St, Sprlngfleld OR 97478-6302
~-J ~ 'M~ - '115.7385
~,'1\'I.'~)_:tr"fo.otl .J~
l/'O e 8rDo.J..u>'M/ (J I
e~ O~ '1740
Propelty Ownel Name Wlllamalane Park and Recreatlon
Address 250 S 32nd St, Spnngheld OR 97478-6302
Phone (541) 736-4055
Dlstrlct - ~ ~
iJ l!
Phone (541) 736-4055
Property Address MultlP!e - See Attached Statement
Assessor's Map No Multlple - See Attached
Tax Lot No Multlple - See Attached
SIze of PlOperty
Square Feet or See Attached Statement
Acres
Ex!stll1g Use of Property Park and RecreatloD, Open Space, Quarry and M1ne Operatlons
DeSCrIption of Proposal Wlllamalane ("the appl1.cant") 15 conductlng prelJ.mlnary feaSlblll.ty
analYSIS for a multI-use transportatIon enhancement proJect to occur between DorrIS Ranch
LIVIng HIstory Farm and Clearwater Park
The 4 mIle long multI-use path IS proposed to be
constructed along the north bank of the MIddle Fork WIllamette RIver
The MIddle Fork
WIllamette RIver Loop Path IS Included as a prIorIty proJect In the 2004 Park and RecreatIon
ComprehenSIve Plan adopted by WIllamalane, the CIty of SprIngfIeld, and Lane County
WIthIn CIty of Sprlnqfleld lurlsdlctlon no~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ :~p proposed on property zoned
PublIC Land and Open Space (PLO) and Quarry and MIne OperatIons (QMO)
The applIcant seeks
to ldentlfy all neceS~Y/lan~:s: app;ovals
Applicant SIgnature '-f/o:::r d./""""",,,,~
the proJect WIll need to obtaIn
Date
S/7/07
( I
For Office Use Only'
JOlllnal No _h2ou~ -~3c> Received By +'1<'--
c:/ U'-03-0l-00-tL. 1100 3100, ~IOJ \"6-o'3dl.00 "11- ~oo
As>c,sor s IVIap No I e.-o~-oz.-ootL. 1.00. Ko'2. Tax Lot No L8-o~ 1'1:00 ll.... LBcr:l
Date Accepted as Complete
8/20/03
1
THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING
The purpose of a Development Issues Meetmg IS to give an apphcant the opportUl1lty to discuss his/her
development proposal with the development review staff of the City The discussIOn can be general or
specific depending on the details provided with the applIcation The applicant's proposal IS circulated to
the relevant staff The planner will schedule a one to two hour meeting between the applIcant and staff
wlthm two to four weeks Staft attendmg the meetmg will be prepared to discuss the Issues raised m the
submittal by the applIcant Other Issues raised dunng the meetmg may also be discussed However the
meetmg Will be mformal and the City will Issue no staff report
A Development Issues Meetmg provides mformatlOn to an applicant related to the current development
conditIOns and standards ofthe City The Development Issues Meetmg IS not a land use decIsIOn and
does not confel any development nghts, establIsh any conditIOns or bmd the applIcant or the City to any
course ot actIOn The meetmg conveys the status of known development opportunities and constramts
The status may change over time as development conditIOns or standards change
AN APPLICATION PACKET CONSISTS OF:
I Ten copies of the proposed Site Plan Suggested mfonnatIon valuable for staff to reVIeW the proposal
IS lIsted below It IS not necessary to mclude all of these Items on the plot plan, however, applIcants are
encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of mformatlon that Will be denved from
the meetmg IS commensurate With the level of detail provided m the applIcatIOn
2 ApplIcant' are also encouraged to mclude additIOnal mformatlOn on the site or plot plan as listed m
the Sprmgfield Development Code (SDC) Article 3 I SlIe Plan Review Standards subsectIOns 3 I 050 or
Article 35 SubdlVlslOn Standards subsectIOn 35 040
3 A list of speCific questIOns the applIcant would lIke staff to answer dunng the meetmg So that each
question I1ldY be fully evaluated, the lIst us lImited to five questIOns
4 The application fee Refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropnate fee A Copy of
the Fee Schedule IS available at the Development Services Department
8/20/03
2
I~
CAMERON
McCARTHY
GILB~RI
SClI~IB~
I ANDSCAPF
ARCHITECTS
LLP
8
"'~..., ..
160 La~l Hrnau\\.IY
r Ub~nl-Orl-b()n 97401
1\..1 'i4i 4X'i 71b1
lax 'i414!-.'i71S9
WWW L m b ~ Lorn
TO
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Spnngfleld OR 97477
TRANSMITTED
Herewith
Separate Cover
By Carner
Other
COPIES
ITEM
'"
1
1
10
Spnngfleld DIM Form
Springfield DIM Statement
Middle Fork Poth - Site Plan
REMARKS
None
COPIES TO
'V Owner
Architect
'" File
Electrical
Civil
Contractor
DATE
PROJECT
PROJ ECT No
DISPOSITION
Signed
For Informotlon
For Reply
For Approval
TRANSMITTAL
May 7 2007
Middle Fork Wlllamette River Loop
Path
0628G
'"
DATED
No PAGES
5/07/07
5/07/07
5/04/07
2
2
I
BY~\
Colin G McArthur
I~
CAMERON
Mt.CARTHY
GILB~,R I
,ClI ~I B Ie
LA]'>.D~c..APF
ARCHITEt. TS
III'
(i
'-q","
160 I a,[ Broadw.1}
I lIbllll Orq,on 97401
III ~41 4h~ 71b)
la\ )414b)7lB'J
www C III b ~ LOIll
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
FROM
Colin McArthur
cc
Fred Wilier
Pat French
Rebecca Gershow
Greg Hyde
DATE
May 7, 2007
REGARDING
Middle Fork Willamette River loop Path,
Springfield DIM Statement
INTRODUCTION
This statement contains location mformatlon and specific land use questions associated with the
proposed Middle Fork Wlllamette River loop Path project
LOCATION
The following table Identifies assessor's map number, tax lot, zone, Size, and site address for parcels
assoCiated with the proposed project
18031200
118031100
I 18030200
. I 18030200
I 18030100
I 18030100
I 18030100
QUARRY & MINE OPERATIONS
PUBLIC LAND & OPEN SPACE
QUARRY & MINE OPERATIONS
PUBLIC LAND & OPEN SPACE
QUARRY & MINE OPERATIONS
PU8L1C LAND & OPEN SPACE
PUBLIC LAND & OPEN SPACE
3 17
7507
4205
177 81 780 DORRIS ST
30 I 28 795 S 28TH ST
258
4673
SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING (DIM) QUESTIONS
1) The proposed alignment crosses three tax lots (18-03-01-00.01100, 18-03-02-00-00600, 18-03-
12-00500) zoned QMO - Quarry and Mine Operations by the Springfield Development Code
and deSignated Sand and Gravel (SG) by the Metro Plan low Impact publiC facilities are
permitted In the QMO zone under SDC 24 030(8) Similar uses may be permitted at the
discretion of the Director A "low Impact" facility IS defined In SDC Article 2 as "any publiC or
semi-public facility that has minimal olfactory, visual, or auditory Impacts" The preface to the
schedule of use categories In 24 030 states that permitted uses are subject to the provIsions of
a Reclamallon Permit Issued by ODGMI Does thiS apply to the proposed path' Ifso, does
thiS refer to a ReclamatIon Permit already Issued to the property owner' Does the
proposed path project meet the definition of a low Impact public faCIlity and/or similar
use and will It be permitted In the QMO zone Without necessitating a zone change/plan
amendment and/or ReclamatIon PermIt'
2) The proposed alignment crosses tax lots zoned PlO - Public land and Open Space by the
Springfield Development Code and deSignated Parks and Open Space by the Metro Plan SDC
23 020(3)(a) permits publiC and private park and recreallon facilities In the PlO zone as a
Middle Fork Wtllamette River Loop Path,
Spnngfleld DIM Statement
2
permitted use or a speCial use SDC 23 020(4Hh) permits low Impact public facilities as a permitted use All uses are
subject to Site Plan Review unless specifically exempted elsewhere In the SDC Is the proposed pathway and
trailhead specifically exempted elsewhere' How will the project be evaluated under the schedule of uses
(23 020), and what procedure WIll It be processed under'
3) Adjacent to the Middle Fork of the Willamette River the riparian area boundary IS 7S feet upland from the top of
bank (SDC 31 240(1 Ha) Pedestrian paths and bikeways are Permitted Uses In Riparian Areas under SDC 31 240(f)
and (g) Within thIS area paths and bikeways "shall be located along the outer edge ofthe required riparian area
away from the watercourse" Portions of the path are proposed to be within the riparian setback Because of steep
slopes, natural breaks In riparian vegetation, engineering conditions etc, the proposed path cannot always be
located on "the outer edge of the riparian area" Are there any ISsues with the proposed path alignment as
shown and Will any additional crrterra apply If the path IS not exactly located on the outer edge of the
riparian area?
4) Will a Floodplain Development Permit be required for portions of the path proposed within the Floodplain
and Will a Greenway Development Permit be required for portions ofthe path within the Greenway' Are
there any key ISsues not already dIScussed that we Will need to address to obtain these approvals'
5) OutSide of Site Plan Review, Floodplain, and Greenway requirements are there any additional approvals the
project Will need to obtain' Are there other standards the project Will need to address (I e engineering and
storm water standards) or other ISsues our applications Will need to address' What are the fees for these
applications, what IS the tlmeframe for review/approval, and can the applications be processed
concurrently' How should we coordinate these applications with Corps/DSL applications'
May 7, 2007
CMGS
,
ZON2oo7-()0030 Developmenllssues Mtg - Willamalane Pari< 1803010001100.3100.3101 180311000050O 180302000060O.802 1803120001800
Streets
.
1-'
Springfield Streets - Tooltip is Street Name
Tax Lots - Tooltip is Maplot
Major Water Features by Type - Tooltip is Featu...
I-I Snringfield City Limits
- - !..""J3PR
iill:m E'!.lIene City limits
-,- !illllreUG
Springfield UGB
--
iilli
!Bi'
-:-
SCALE 1 : 21,643
~
1.000
o
1.000
FEET
2.000
3.000
http://spintranetlmg_mwf/spr_main_tide_83.mwf
__ T
N
A
Tuesday, May 08, 2007 1 :42 PM