The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence COUNTY 6/25/2008 Page I of I METZGER Mark Date Received Planner MM (, Iv> If/I From Sent To Subject SUCHART David S [David S SUCHART@co lane or us] Wednesday, June 25,2008902 AM METZGER Mark, Bill Seider RE Lane County Rlverstone Cllmc - Modular Offices The modular will be removed because they will be leased or owned by the County not the property owner From: METZGER Mark [mallto mrmetzger@cl springfield or us] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 8 41 AM To: Bill Seider Cc: SUCHART DaVid 5 Subject' RE Lane County Rlverstone Cllmc - Modular Offices Well, I'm Impressed You're In before 6am and wrlling e-malls Either you are a real early bird, or your are under the gun hope this helps Ordinarily no structures apart from paving, fences, etc are allowed to be bUilt over an easement I spoke with the project engineer and he agreed that given the temporary nature of the bUilding, bUilding the walkwaylramp over the PUE would be allowable If there was a clear statement In the development agreement stipulating that If for some reason It needed to be removed to access the protected faCIlity, that the removal and repairs would be at owner expense We are treating the walkway/ramp as the equivalent of a sidewalk In this case, and not a structure per se In no case should a structure that could not reasonably be removed for repair/maintenance access be placed over any PUE I guess at this pOint, I want to confirm that the modular strucuture will be removed when the cllmc moves to ItS new quarters If the structure will remain, It will be more difficult to make allowances like we are domng for the walkway/ramp From: Bill Seider [mallto bselder@plvotarchltecture com] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 5 55 AM To: METZGER Mark Cc: SUCHART DaVid 5 Subject: Lane County Rlverstone Cllmc - Modular Offices Mark - Can you tell me If we would be allowed to construct the wooden stair and ramp up to the modular office bUilding In the ten foot side yard easement on the east side of the new bUilding, and across the 10 foot utility easement on the south side of the property? Trying to push the bUilding as far east as pOSSible so It doesn't overhang the west property line Thanks Bill Seider, AlA PIVOT Architecture d 5417621618 t 5413427291 www plvotarchltecture com 7/16/2008 Date Received Planner. MM Page I of2 ilz.,/<< METZGER Mark From Sent To Cc Subject Bill Seider [bselder@plvotarchltecture com] Wednesday, June 25, 20082 33 PM METZGER Mark SUCHART David S RE Lane County Rlverstone Clinic - Modular Offices Great - That works for us Bill Seider, AlA PIVOT Architecture d 541 7621618 t 5413427291 www p/votarchltecture com From: METZGER Mark [mallto mrmetzger@cl springfield or us] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 9 55 AM To: Bill Seider Cc' 5UCHART David 5 Subject: RE Lane County Rlverstone Clinic - Modular Offices Sorry, I was a little too focused on the word easement and missed the pOint Your conceptual drawing showed a 10-foot setback from the east property line My read of the code indicates that only a 5-foot landscaped setback IS reqUired for an interior yard setback (SDC 3 2-215) The walkway/ramp structure should stay outside of the 5-foot setback on the east Side From: Bill Seider [mallto bselder@plvotarchltecture com] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 8 57 AM To: METZGER Mark Cc: 5UCHART David 5 Subject: RE Lane County Rlverstone CliniC - Modular Offices Thanks Mark - Actually I am In Pittsburgh for a conference, so the early e-mail was Just my way of getting a head start on the Oregonians The Info on the easement sounds great The county, as far as I know, IS stili planning to only rent these modular Units so that Will almost assure that they are removed when they vacate to a new site What about the other queslion about building the ram In the east setback from the adJOIning property? Is that a bUilding code Issue or a zOning code Issue? Bill Seider, AlA PIVOT Architecture d 5417621618 t 541 3427291 www plvotarchltecture com From: METZGER Mark [mallto mrmetzger@cl springfield or us] Sent: Wednesday, June 25,2008841 AM To. Bill Seider Cc: SUCHART DaVid S Subject. RE Lane County Rlverstone CliniC - Modular Offices Well, I'm Impressed You're In before 6am and writing e-malls Either you are a real early bird, or your are under the gun I 7/16/2008 d..:&.. Page 2 of2 L _ _e Received *~ . Planner. MM hope this helps Ordlnanly no structures apart from paving, fences, etc are allowed to be bUilt over an easement I spoke with the project engineer and he agreed that given the temporary nature of the bUilding, bUilding the walkway/ramp over the PUE would be allowable If there was a clear statement In the development agreement stipulating that If for some reason It needed to be removed to access the protected facIlity, that the removal and repairs would be at owner expense We are treating the walkwaylramp as the eqUivalent of a sidewalk In this case, and not a structure per se In no case should a structure that could not reasonably be removed for repalrlmalntenance access be placed over any PUE I guess at this pOint, I want to confirm that the modular strucuture will be removed when the cllmc moves to ItS new quarters If the structure will remain, [t will be more difficult to make allowances like we are domng for the walkwaylramp From: Bill Seider [mallto bselder@plvotarchltecture com] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 5 55 AM To: METZGER Mark Cc: SUCHART David 5 Subject: Lane County Rlverstone Clime - Modular Offices Mark - Can you tell me If we would be allowed to construct the wooden stair and ramp up to the modular office bUilding In the ten foot side yard easement on the east side of the new building, and across the 10 foot utility easement on the south side of the property? Trying to push the bUilding as far east as possible so It doesn't overhang the west property line Thanks Bill Seider, AlA PIVOT Architecture d 5417621618 t 541 342 7291 WNW plvotarchltecture com 7/16/2008 Date Received Planner MM vl-z"/fl~ Page I of 1 METZGER Mark From Sent To Cc Subject Bill Seider [bselder@plvotarchltecture com] Wednesday, June 25, 2008 5 55 AM METZGER Mark SUCHART David S Lane County Rlverstone Clinic - Modular Offices Mark - Can you tell me If we would be allowed to construct the wooden stair and ramp up to the modular office bUilding In the ten foot side yard easement on the east side of the new bUilding, and across the 10 foot utility easement on the south side of the property? Trying to push the bUilding as far east as possible so It doesn't overhang the west property line Thanks Bill Seider, AlA PIVOT Architecture d 541 7621618 t 541 342 7291 www plvotarchltecture com 6/25/2008