HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments PLANNER 7/31/2008
.
-
ZON2008-00028 Lively SWim Park ExpansIOn
Development Issues Meetmg ~I .--/
July 31, 2008 R ved 1; I 6"1
Date ecel , '
Planner MM
Planrung Comments
1. Project Phasmg
Unless the site plan approved for the LIVely SWIm Park mcludes the elements proposed
for this expanSIOn, or some srmIiar level of development mtenslty, this must be processed
as a new site plan If there were specific references m the approved 1987-88 site plan to
the Improvements proposed now, we may be able to process this as a Major Site Plan
ModificatIOn SDC 5 17-145
Major Site Plan modificatIOns are a Type II process WIth the same notice and approval
conditIOns as a regular site plan review The difference m cost compared to a regular site
plan process IS less than $150 SDC 5 17-145
A full site plan revlCW with a phased development plan mcluded as part of the proposal
would allow WIilamalane to complete ItS expansIOn work over a two year penod (3 years
WIth an extensIOn) SDC 517-115
2. Water QualIty
The distance of the proposed development (partIcularly the dog park) from Cedar Creek
and from the eXlstmg dramage swale IS not likely to create water quahty Issues The dog
park faCility, as descnbed WIll be eqUipped for pet waste recovery disposal A kIosk or
other means of educatmg/mformmg users of the dog park of the Importance of pickIng up
pet waste would be Important
The site IS near the Thurston Middle School wellhead A dnnkmg water protectIOn'
permit WIll be reqUired
4. Floodplam
Enc Bloom of the Corps of Engmeers was contacted about the tnrung for completIOn of
the new McKenZie floodplam mappmg and he mdlcated that the draft floodplam mappmg
won't be aVailable untIl the end of this year