Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments PLANNER 6/12/2008 Date Received ~x Planner MM ( 11- Proposed Property LlDe Adjustment- Lane Countyf Steven Reaves Case No. SOO2008-00025 Staff Report and NotIce of DecIsIon ApplIcant/Owner Michael Jackson Lane County Surveyor's Office 125 E 8th Street Eugene, OR 97401 SnbJect PropertIes (Map No and Tax Lot) 18-03-02-32 Tax Lots 500, 700, 701 Zomng Low Density Residential I. ExecutIve Summary F ~ure 1. ApplIcant's RepresentatIve Jeff Turk Lane County Property Management 125 E 8th Street Eugene, OR 97401 Parcel SIZe Before and After Adjustment Current TL 500= 7419 I sq ft After 10,518 sq ft TL 700= 1161 9 sq ft After 0 TL 701= 37,037 sq ft After 35,100 sq ft Date Received 6f3f2008 Date Accepted as Complete 6f312008 Date of the Director's DeCISIOn 6/17/2008 ., Tax Lot 500 /" /' " ~ Tax Lot 701 Lane County/ Steven Reaves Property Lme Adjustment Case No SUB2008-00025 June 17, 2008 I Date Received Planner MM 1.,/t7lo~ , t,~1 The Figure I above Identifies the subject lots affected by tlus property Ime adjustment applicant proposes to use the property lme adjustment process to I) Elimmate the property lme between TL 500 and TL 700, thereby addmg the area wltlun TL 700 to TL 500 2) Adjust the property lme between TL 701 and the new enlarged TL 500, addmg a small amount of acreage to 500 Whtle unusual, usmg the lot Ime adjustment procedure to elimmate a property lme, and m effect, merge two lots IS Witlun accepted professIOnal survey practice and IS specifically allowed under ORS 92 010 (12) ThiS was confirmed by the City Surveyor m a conversatIOn and bye-mail on June 10, 2008 Based on a review of the proposed property Ime adjustment usmg the approval cntena for found m SectIOn 516-125 of the Spnngfield Development Code (SDC), staff finds that the proposal IS m compliance With applicable standards The application IS approved. II. Procedural Requirements Property lme adjustments are a "Type I (Mmlstenal)" process SectIOn 5 1-125 of the SDC states that Type I declSlons may be made by the Director "Without public notice and Without public heanng" Type I applicatIOns are to be reviewed for completeness and for conformance With the applicable cntena for approval of the proposal stated m the Development Code Based on the Director's reView, a decIsIOn IS Issued, wluch IS the final decIsIOn of the City Staff has reviewed the applicant's submittal for completeness requrrements found m SectIOn 5 16-120 of the SDC Staff found the applicant's submiSSIOn complete on June 12,2007 III. CnterIa for Approval SectIOn 5 16-125 of the SDC lists the cntena to be used for approvmg a property lme adjustment The code sectIOn states that property lme adjustment shall not A Create a new lot/parcel, B Create a landlocked lot/parcel, C Reduce an eXlstmg lot/parcel below the mmlmum size standard or reduce setbacks below the mmnnum established by the applicable zorung dlstncts m tlus Code, D VIOlate any prevIOus conditIOns the Approval Authonty may have Imposed on the lots/parcels mvolved m the applicatIOn E Detnmentally alter the availability of eXlstmg public and/or pnvate utilities to each lot/parcel III the applicatIOn or to abuttmg lotsfparcels, or F Increase the degree of non-conformity of each lot, parcel, or structure that IS non- conformmg at the time of applicatIOn Lane County/ Steven Reaves Property Lme A<iJustment Case No SUB2008-00025 June 17, 2008 2 Date ReceIved ~I of Planner' MM 3 f) J, The sectIOn below evaluates the proposed property Ime adjustment agamst the approval 1> ' CrIterIa hsted above Shall not... A. Create a new lot/parcel; Fmdmg 1 The proposal does not create a new parcel Tax Lot 500 IS enlarged and by ehmmatmg the eXlstmg property hne between Tax Lot 500 and Tax Lot 700, addmg the land Wlthm Tax Lot 700 to Tax Lot 500 The property hne between Tax Lot 500 and Tax Lot 701 IS adjusted 0 add a small amount of acreage to Tax Lot 500 B. Create a landlocked lot/parcel; Fmding 2 The proposed hne adjustment does not change the eXlstmg access that Tax Lot 500 and Tax Lot 701 have to Harbor DrIve The proposal does not create a landlocked parcel C. Reduce an exlStmg lot/parcel below the mlmmum sIze standard or reduce setbacks below the mimmum established by the appbcable zonmg dlStrtcts in thIS Code; Fmdmg 3 The SprIngfield Zorung Map shows that the zomng for the subject lots IS Low Density ResldentJal (LDR) Fmdmg 4 SectIOn 3 2-420 of the SDC shows the mlmmum lot Size on a north/south orIented street IS 5,000 square feet Fmdmg 5 The property hne adjustment will result m Tax Lot 500 bemg 10,518 square feet m size Tax Lot 701 Will be 35,100 square feet m size 'Fmdmg 6 Both Tax Lots 500 and 701 Will be larger than the 5,000 sq ft mlmmum lot Size, under the proposed property hne adjustment The lot Ime adjustment does not create a substandard lot, nor does It reduce nearby setbacks D. Violate any prevIOus condItions the Approval Authortty may have Imposed on the lotslparcels involved m the applIcation; Fmding 7 A review of a current tJtle report Issued by Evergreen Land and Title Company on the subject parcels shows that no known condltJons have been Imposed by the City of SprIngfield, Lane County, or any other authorIty E Detrtmentally alter the aVallabllity pi exlStmg pubbc and/or prtvate utIlitIes to each lot/parcel m the applIcatIOn or to abuttmg lots/parcels; or Fmdmg 8 The property lme adjustment does not affect the prOVISIOn of services to the eXlstmg lots and does not prevent the extensIOn of services to other parcels Lane County/ Steven Reaves Property Lme Acljustment Case No SUB2008-00025 June 17, 2008 3 Date Received -d.. L 7 / tJ'{; Planner MM r ~ 1 F. Increase the degree of non-conformlty of each lot, parcel, or structure that IS non- conformmg at the tIme of applicatIOn. Findmg 9 Both Tax Lot 500 and Tax Lot 701 conform WIth eXlstmg zorung standards for the LDR zone, and WIll contmue to do so Ifthe property hne adjustment IS approved Conclusion and DeCision of the Director The findmgs of fact WIth respect to the stated cntena for approval found m SectIOn 5 16- 125 ofthe SDC, demonstrate that the proposed property lme adjustment IS consIstent WIth those cntena The proposed property hne adjustment is approved. III. Next Steps Please return three copies ofthe recorded map to Mark Metzger, Development ServIces Lane County/ Steven Reaves Property Lme A4Justment Case No SUB2008-00025 June 17, 2008 4