The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotice PLANNER 7/10/2008 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE STATE OF OREGON } }ss. County of Lane } I, Brenda Jones, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows 1 I state that I am a Secretary for the Planning DIvIsion of the Development Services Department, City of Spnngfield, Oregon 2 I state that In my capacity as Secretary, I prepared and caused to be mailed copies of Notice of Decision - LRP2008-00008 (See attachment "A") on July 10, 2008 addressed to (see Attachment "B"), by causing said letters to be placed In a U S mall box With postage fully prepaid thereon Brenda Jones Planning Secretary STATE OF OREGON, County of Lane Cif;.h 1. /0 , 2008 Personally appeared the above named Brenda Jones, ~ who acknowledged the foregoing Instrument to be their voluntary act Before me 1-------------------' 'I) OFFICIAL SEAL I . SANDRA MARX j . , ' NOTARY PUBLIC. OREGON j I COMMISSION NO 385725 I I MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV 12,2008 I -------------------,, ~)nMJ0 f My Commission Expires 11//2../ 2..() O~ , Date Received '7 ~ (0 -or Planner DR I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT I 'kW""''S41eii, NOTICE OF DECISION',,!:,""'i,'<?i'lkj,.,v'i "I ~;&?~~"+'c..~ ",,,-~ _ '1:jl~""-~~!ifN _~<if?Y;,,_; ~7~'~ i',;;' SPRINGFIELD,CITY,COUNCIL ' ,.,,~'p:,,: . METRO PLAN MAP AMENDMENT DATE OF NOTICE July 10th, 200l6f ~ July 7th, 200,i 66 LRP2008-00008 DATE OF DECISION JOURNAL NUMBER APPLICANT City of Springfield NATURE OF REQUEST The Springfield City Council initiated a Metro Plan Map Amendment from Low Density Residential (LOR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR) This PlanlZone conflict was the result of the adoption of the present Metro Plan diagram (c 2004) which designated these properties LOR even though all prevIous actions by the City Council established MDR as the appropriate designation for this area I LOCATION OF PROPERTY I The subject site IS located on approximately 8 79 acres Identified as Tax Lots 1700, 1801- 1826, 1900, 2000, 2100, 2300, 2400, 2401, 2402, 2602 on Assessor's Map No 17-03-27-34 I DECISION On June 17th, 2008 the Planning Commission held a public heanng on the Plan Diagram Amendment request The Planning Commission deliberated and voted 6 In favor, 0 opposed, and 1 absent to forward a recommendation of approval to the Springfield City Council On July 7th, 2008 the City Council held a public hearing to receive testimony and hear comments on this proposal The City Council voted 4 In favor, 0 opposed, and 2 absent, adopting Ordinance Number 6223 amending the Metro Plan Diagram I APPEAL Pursuant to ORS 197 830(2)(b), a notice of Intent to appeal may be filed with the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) by those who appeared before the local government, special district or state agency orally or In writing If you wish to appeal, you must file a notice of Intent to appeal with the LUBA no later than 21 days from the date the deCISion was mailed to you by the local government Copies of the notice of Intent to appeal must be served upon the local govemment and others who received written notice of the final decIsion from the local government The notice of Intent to appeal must be served and filed In the fonn and manner prescribed by LUBA, (OAR Chapter 66a, DIVISion 100 Please call LUBA at 503-373-1265, If you have questions about appeal procedures I QUESTIONS If you have any questions concerning thiS matter, please contact DaVid Reesor, Planner III at 541 7263783 c-zJ~/?4_., c.- DaVid Reesor, Planner III Date ReceiVed. 7 -/6 -0"6' Planner DR ~AI: Easy Peel labels '"'~ . Use Avery@ TEMPLATE S960T. 170327341700 James McAlexander 1398 Rainbow Dr Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 170327341803 Alice Mills 972 W "L" Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 170327341806 Fem Verlore Dalby I Kathleen McCoy 978 W "L" Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 170327341809 Melba Sanders 986 W "L" Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 170327341812 Karen Lissa Hillyard I Susan Case 990 W "L" Street Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 170327341815 Ruth Onsum 996 W "L" Street Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 170327341818 Susan Enkson 1002 W"L" Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 170327341821 Lounetta Blair 1008 W "L" Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 170327341824 Janet Strobel 1016 W 'L" Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 170327341900 Cora Jones I Robert Cook 942 W "L" Street Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 Etiquettes faclles II peler Utlhsez Ie gabarlt AVERY@ S960MC ... - See Instruction Sheet l ~ tbiJ I Paper for Easy Peel Feature 1 ~AVERY@S960TM 1 170327341801 170327341802 LouIs Kennedy I Paine Family Trust 968 W "L" Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 170327341804 Vicki Mcvay 974 W "L' Street Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 170327341807 Sharon Medart I Ramah Sherrer 980 W "L" Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 170327341810 Mark McBee I 0 Kimberly 988 W "L" Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 170327341813 Gayle Hamlett I Leon & Gayle Hamlett Trust 992 W "L" Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 170327341816 Susan Gleason I Judith Ott 998 W "L" Street Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 170327341819 Lola Gillespie 1004 W "L' Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 170327341822 Edward Lucier 1012 W "L" Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 170327341825 Karen Snyder 1018 W "L" Street Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 170327342000 Bertha Berkshire 1392 Rainbow Dr Springfield, Oregon 97477 ... Sens de chargement Adeline Katshen 970 W "L" Street Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 170327341805 Marc Sllvan 976 W 'L' Street Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 170327341808 Glona Knudsen 984 W "L" Street Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 170327341811 Assoc of Owners of BI-Centennral Park Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 170327341814 Jeanne Lovaasen 994 W "L' Street Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 170327341817 Clara Force 1D00 W 'L" Street Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 170327341820 Mary Howard 1006 W "L" Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 170327341823 Pamela Higgins 1014 W 'L" Street Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 170327341826 Philip & LouIs Shelley 1010 W 'L" Street Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 170327342100 Lonne & Jill Morse 901 W "L' Street Spnngfield, Oregon 97477 Consulte. la feullle d'mstructlon ~ J \) '\ \\ ~a:: -0 ~ Q)... a::Q) Q)e: ...e: tIl.!!! 00. www avery com '-800.GO-AVERY I ~ ~'i Easy Peel Labe s ~~ . Use Avery@ TEMPLATE 5960T. 170327342300 Vemon Haagenson 941 W"L' Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 1703273402400 Ph~l~p Dunn 957 W L Street Spr~ngf~eld, Oregon 1703273402602 Ra~nbow V~llage Inc. 1250 Ra~nbow Dr., Apt. 1-80 Spr~ngf~eld, Oregon 97477 EtIquettes faClles a peler Utlllsez Ie gabant AVERY@ 5960.' A 1 Paper - 1703273402401 5ee InstructIon 5heet i ~ for Easy Peel Feature l ~AVERY@5960TM 1 1703273402402 Patr~ck Mekech 945 G Street Spr~ngfield, Oregon 97477 , A Sens de chargement Ph~l~p Dunn 957 W. L Street Spr~ngf~eld, Oregon 97477 Date ReceIVed Planner DR Consultez la feud Ie d'lnstructlon www avery com 1.800-GO-AVERY " I " . AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE STATE OF OREGON } }ss. County of Lane } I, Brenda Jones, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows 1 I state that I am a Secretary for the Planning DIvIsion of the Development Services Qepartment, City of Springfield, Oregon 2 I state that in my capacity as Secretary, I prepared and caused to be mailed copies of DLCD Notice of Adoption - LRP2008-00008 (See attachment "A") on July 10, 200~ addressed to (see Attachment "B"), by causing said letters to be placed In a U S mall box with postage fully prepaid thereon B,.ed. Joo", L6~IlI/ Planning Secretary STATE OF OREGON, County of Lane ~ If), 2008 Personally appeared the above named Brenda Jones, ~hO acknowledged the foregoing Instrument to be their voluntary act Before me Yt=~~=~=~--:--OJIC;A~SE~'-= -::=~': .. SANDRA MARlI I ' , NOTARY P' JBlIC O~EGON I COMMI,bION NO 385725 : MY COMMISSIO~ "Xpl~t;' NOV 12, 2008 ~ t.~.,-:-'~ ----.--.-~~~~~~~ ~'mANL I My Commission Expires 1/ /1 Z /20 0 ~ , , Date ReceiVed '7 -/0 - elf Planner DR " 0 In person 0 electronic 0 maIled 52 DLCD Notice of ~doption THIS FORM MUST BE MAILED TO DLCD WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS AFTER THE FINAL DECISION PER ORS 197 6 I 0, OAR CHAPTER 660 - DIVISION] 8 for DLCD u~c Onh, ~-- JUrISdiction City of Springfield Local file number LRP2008-00008 Date of Adoption 7/7/2008 Date Mailed 7/10/2008 Was a Notice of Proposed Amendment (Form 1) mailed to DLCD? YesDate 4/24/08 o Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment ~ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment o Land Use Regulation Amendment 0 Zoning Map Amendment o New Land Use Regulation 0 Other SummarIze the adopted amendment Do not use technical terms Do not WrIte "See Attached" The City of Spnngfield Initiated a Metro Plan Map Amendment from Low DenSity Residential (LDR) to Medium DenSity ReSidential (MDR) m the subject area Tills Plan/Zone COnflict was the result of the adoptIOn of the present Metro Plan diagram (c 2004) willch deSignated these properties LDR even though all prevIOus actIOns by the City CounCil established MDR as the appropnate deSignatIOn for tills area Does the Adoption differ from proposal? No, no explalnatlon IS necessary Plan Map Changed from LOR to MDR Zone Map Changed from to Location CentennIal Blvd & Rainbow Drive Acres Involved 8.79 Specify DenSity PrevIous 1-10 UnIts p/acre New 10-20 UnIts p/acre Applicable stateWide planning goals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ~~DDDDDDD~DDDDDDDDD . Was an Exception Adopted? 0 YES ~ NO Old DLCD receive a Notice of Proposed Amendment 45-days prIor to first eVidentiary hearIng? If no, do the stateWide planning goals apply? If no, did Emergency Circumstances reqUire Immediate adoption? ~Yes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo Date Received '7 -("0- o<t Planner DR " OLeo file No Please list all affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts Local Contact DaVId Reesor Address 225 FIfth Street City Sprmgfield Zip 97477- Phone (541) 726-3783 Extension Fax Number 541-726-3689 E-mail Addressdreesor@cl.sprmgfieldor.us ,ADOPTION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ThIs form must be mailed to DLCD wlthm 5 work1nl! davs after the final decisIOn per ORS 197 610, OAR Chapter 660 - DIVISIOn 18 1 Send tins Form and TWO ComDlete Comes (documents and mans) of the Adonted Amendment to ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150 SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 2 Electroruc SubmIttals At least one hard copy must be sent by mall or m person, but you may also submIt an electromc copy, by eIther emall or FTP You may connect to thIS address to FTP proposals and adoptIOns webserver.lcd.state.or.us To obtam our Username and password for FTP, call Mara Ulloa at 503-373-0050 extensIOn 238, or by emallmgmaraulloa@state.or.us 3 Please Note Adopted matenals must be sent to DLCD not later than FIVE (5) work1ng days followmg the date ofthe fmal deCISIOn on the amendment 4 Subnuttal of thIS NotIce of AdoptIOn must mclude the text of the amendment plus adopted findmgs and supplementary mformatlOn 5 The deadlIne to appeal WIll not be extended tf you subnut thIS nonce of adoptIOn W1t1nn five workmg days of the final dectSlon Appeals to LUBA may be filed W1t1nn TWENTY-ONE (21) days of the date, the NotIce of AdoptIOn IS sent to DLCD 6 In addItIOn to sendmg the Nonce of AdoptIOn to DLCD, you must notify persons who partICIpated m the local hearing and requested nonce of the fmal deCISIOn 7 Need More CopIes? You can now access these forms onIme at http://www.1cdstate.or.us/Please pnnt on 8-112x11l!reen DaDer onlv You may also call the DLCD Office at (503) 373-0050, or Fax your request to (503) 378-5518, or Emall your request to mara.ulloa@state.or.us - ATTENTION PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST Date Received 7 -(0 - as Planner' DR " ORDINANCE NO 6223 (General) AN ORDINANCE AJ\.1ENDING THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN GEN- ERAL PLAN DIAGRAM BY REDESIGNATING 8 79 ACRES OF LAND FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LOR), TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR), AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FINDS THAT. WHEREAS, SectIon 5 14-]00 of the Spnngfield Development Code sets forth proce- dures for Metro Plan diagram amendments, and WHEREAS, SubsectIon 5 ] 4 - ] 20 (B)(1) states "The City CounCIl may mlllate a Type lor Type II Metro Plan amendment at anytIme ConsIderatIOn of thIS type of amendment shall begm ImmedlOtely thereafter ", and WHEREAS, On Apnl 21 Sl, 2008, the Spnngfield Common CouncIl voted unanImously to InItIate a Metro Plan Diagram Amendment for the follOWing Plan Diagram Amendment Amend Plan DeSIgnatIon on the Metropohtan Area General Plan ("Metro Plan") Dia- gram from Low DenSity ReSIdential (LDR) to MedIUm DenSity ReSIdentIal (MDR) for apprOlumately 8 79 acres IdentIfied as Tax Lots 1700, ]801-1826, ]900,2000,2100, 2300,2400,240],2402,2602 on Assessor's Map No ] 7-03-27-34, and WHEREAS, TImely and suffiCient notIce of the pubhc heanng, per SectIOn 5 2-]]5 (a)(1)-(14) of the Spnngfield Development Code, has been proVIded, and WHEREAS, On May 29th, 2008, City Staff conducted a NeIghborhood Meeting Two p.vl'~' ~j owners attended the meeting - one property owner WIthin the subject area, and the other property owner Just west of the subject area No concerns were raised WHEREAS, On June] 7th, 2008 the Plannmg CommiSSIOn held a pubhc heanng on the Plan D18gram Amendment request The Development ServIces Department staff notes including CrItena of approval, findmgs and recommendatIons, together With the testunony and submIttals of the persons testifYing at that hearing were conSidered and were part ofthe record of the proceed- mg The Plannmg CommiSSIOn dehberated and voted 6 In favor, 0 opposed, and I absent to for- ward a recommendatIon of approval to the Common CounCil, and WHEREAS, On July 7th, 2008 the Spnngfield Common CouncIl held a public hearIng to receive testImony and hear comments on thIS proposal The Common CouncIl IS now ready to take actIon on thiS proposal based upon the above recommendatIon and the eVidence and testi- mony already In the record as well as the eVidence and testImony presented at thiS public hearing held In the matter of adoptmg thIS Ordinance amending the Metro Plan Diagram NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS SectIon ] The above findings are hereby adopted ORDINANCE NO 6223 PAGE] OF2 Date Received. 77o-0X Planner DR Section 2 The Metro Plan desIgnatIOn of the subject property, more particularly de- scnbed m ExhIbit A attached hereto and mcorporated herem by reference, IS hereby amended from Low DensIty Residential (LDR) to MedIUm DensIty ResidentIal (MDR) SectIOn 3 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portIOn of thiS Ordi- nance IS for any reason held mvahd or unconstitutIOnal by any court of competent Juns- diction, that portIOn shall be deemed a separate, dlstmct, and mdependent provISIon and that holdmg shall not affect the vahdlty of the remammg portIon OfthlS Ordmance SectIOn 4 It IS hereby found and declared that matters pertammg to the Metro Plan dia- gram amendment affect the pubhc health, safety and welfare of the CIty of Sprmgfield and an Emergency IS therefore declared and thiS Ordmance shall take effect ImmedIately upon ItS passage by the CounCIl and approval by the Mayor FURTHER, although not part of thiS Ordmance, the Spnngfield Common CounCil adopts findmgs herem above, and the findmgs set forth m the Staff Report whIch demonstrate conformance of this amendment to the Metro Plan, apphcable State statutes and apphcable State- WIde Planmng Goals and Admmlstratlve Rules, and IS attached as ExhIbit A ADOPTED by the Common CounCIl of the CIty ofSpnngfield thIS 7th day of July ,2008byavoteof~forand~agamst (2 absent) APPROVED by the Mayor of the City ofSpnngfield thiS 7th day of July ,2008 Q v>~< ~ Mayor 7 /. ATTEST &AA~J- CIty RecordfJ RE\l!~mD ;:, IH'r~CVED AS TO FORM ~ CJ<"-J' ,..I. ) L1".A'~ DAT~ \o..!..2-l I~ ()~~I(,,~ Of errv ATTORNEY City of Springfield. Oregon CERTIFIED TRUE COPY ~~ ORDINANCE NO 6??1 PAGE20F2 Date ReceIVed '7 -" "" _ Cf6 Planner DR . Type II Metro Plan Map Amendment Staff Report and Findings HearmQ. Date June 17m, 2008 - Planning Commission July 7th, 2007 - City Council ADDhcant Case Number:, LRP 2008-00008 PrODertv Owners ADDhcant's ReDresentatJve N/A City of Springfield 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 See appendiX 'A' Date Submitted April 24, 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Sprmgfield City Council voted unanimously on April 215\ 2008 to Initiate a Metro Plan Diagram Amendment for property In the subject area Staff first presented the Issue to the Planning CommisSion on Aprrl15', 2008, who In turn recommended It be sent to Council for mltratlon of a Plan Amendment ThiS City Council mltrated Plan Amendment IS based upon eVidence In the record which supports the need for the Diagram Amendment In the summer of 2007, the owner of property located at 1398 Rainbow Drrve approached the City about further developing his property At that time, he was told that there was a Plan I Zone conflict on his property, and that he could apply for a City sponsored zone change to resolve the conflict on the property After applYing for the City sponsored zone change, further research from Planning Staff mdlcated that there were conflicting Issues related to the Plan I Zone conflict The applicant Withdrew the City sponsored zone change application until the City could resolve these Issues In recent years, Staff had mterpreted the LOR designation on the Plan Diagram to "match up" With the western boundary of the Community Commercial (CC) zOning south of Centennial However, research conducted m the fall of 2007 found that the City of Springfield approved MDR zOning (which was conSidered "R-2" zOning at the time) west of Rambow Drive In 1971 (Ord 3100) and again In 1978 (Ord 5121) From thiS research, It seemed doubtful to Staff that the Intent of the Plan makers was to consciously Invalidate approximately 8 acres of eXisting MDR zOning west of Rainbow Drrve Staff's research also found that the rezoning of properties In the 1970s to MDR (R-2 at the time) resulted In the development of the Rainbow Village apartments In the early 1970s and the Bicentennial Park Condos In the mld-1990s Journal files for both the Bicentennial Park Condos and the Rainbow Village apartments stated the Plan designation as MDR Currently no refinement plan eXists for thiS area Two local deCISions have provided direction to property owners In thiS area In the past That direction has been to confirm . , ..~ .. . ,J...... t ...... '1'-' t.;i ;f:..--:' LRP200B-OOOOB Date Received 7 -/()- 0"6' Planner DR that medium density levels are appropnate In this location west of Rainbow Dnve and consistent with the Plan Based upon the results of this research, the City Council initiated a Plan Diagram Amendment for the subject area REQUEST The applicant IS requesting approval to change the map designation on the Metropolitan Area General Plan ("Metro Plan") diagram from Low Density Residential (LOR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR) for approximately 8 79 acres located near Rainbow Dnve A Metro Plan Amendment at this time (not dunng Penodlc Review) IS known as a Post Acknowledgement Plan Amendments (PAPA) SITE DESCRIPTION. The subject site IS located on approximately 8 79 acres Identified as Tax Lots 1700, 1801-1826,1900,2000,2100,2300,2400,2401,2402,2602 on Assessor's Map No 17-03-27-34 The subject properties Include currently developed property east of Rainbow Dnve, south of M Street, east of Centenmal Elementary School, and north of Centennial Blvd The site consists pnmanly of medium denSity development, With some eXisting Single family homes Within the subject area The properties have no lunsdlctlonal wetlands or Inventoned Goal 5 natural or hlstonc resources The site IS Within the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary, and all the subject parcels were annexed Into the City of Spnngfield In the 1960s There IS no eXisting Refinement Plan for the subject area The abutting properties to the east are deSignated Medium DenSity Residential The areas Immediately west, north and south of the site are deSignated Low DenSity Residential Uate RecelvE'rI 7./lo-rf6 Planner. DR lRP200~0008 - ....\ lo3)~] I C~I...t,. '{\~ -,i'\n;;~! 1 ,f~., ;,,...."',' /"-,/ /V ~ :;> - 2 l..IJ Cl 0: <( c:J Urban Growth Boundary Metro Plan Boundary RaDroadll Rlwrs and Pond, Overlays: ~ Mixed U6C Areas ~ Ned III Developtnent Area o lh1lIamet111 GreenwllV CENT LRP1008-00008 Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan Plan Diagram (The 1l1tefpretlbOll and puq>ose of the Plan Olagram. and descnpnons oftbe landus~ and symbols roo\\-n. are contamrow Chapter II-G) 0 Low Density Residential 0 Ughl McdllJm Industrial II AgrlcUturc 0 Medium DeO$llv Re.bendal ~ Campus industrial I! Fore,t Land rJ HIgh Denclty Redienllal D UnlYl!Irsltv Rellearcn ~ Rural Residential II Commercial D Cio-..mnmont /Ind Frluc.ltion ~ RUT"I Commercial. 1m M<lIor Actal Centers .. Parks and Opcn Space ~ Rurallnductrial 1m Hea\IY industrial CJ Natural Re50urce ~ Alrport Reserve Illa Special Heavy Indu.trlal D Sand and Gravel . Subject Area West of Rambow Drive, South of M Street - Appears as eXlstmg LDR DesIgnatIon - Proposed DIagram Amendment to MDR Designation - ~!JIP' HA YDfN , """.BRIDGERD ""0 - o , . ....1..'............ I" r- if) :c r- LD E 8T ...~-,. ~"""'c=l.~_ Date Received ,~ 'cO - ~: Planner DR ~E61 ~ ~Jn ~;:~ Springfield FAlRvrowOR =i iO! ==L._____ . 'nl -,--, , Erll-P3iT-TI1..JI~_'=I J Zonmg Map ,1 ' 1111 I I JeT- Jl6j, --j , " YMPicS'1 ~Yrc'sT --1 = ill' NIGHTIf~~ Jr ltlli ] t]____~~ jJ1tII_~~JJt: I~mro ::1' r \ U, I, ~.g.nd ... r- 'lilKLOb; "'O~TI1 HlgtOtnsllyl'lMllMtl!l -.lMII.1I'IDInslly~rUiiR l.CIII'OenslIJftI!s:OIIlII~ . """"....,."""""", NII~txmXlC'Ctll'1rnfrail _~c.una&~rSpaot _ m , . - -- , / -(0-6(, Date Received. Planner DR LRP200B-OOOOB Existing Site Conditions: Bicentennial Condominiums - Stage 2 Approximately 17 Dwelling Units per/acre Located west of Rainbow Dnve Bicentennial Condominiums - Stage 1 Approximately 17 Dwelling Units per/acre - Located west of Rainbow Dnve ~ Centennial Apartments - Located east of Rainbow Dnve !RP20084JOOOB Rainbow Village Apartments - Located west of Rainbow Dnve ~. ..~-"'" ~ - .". .c. ~ ~ Rainbow Village Apartments - Located west of Rainbow Dnve ) 'I't"\ r' ,- I ,,\,) \ " , I , '-- ~. I~-: ....,,, .. - -~ I- '. ::---...-- \ " ., --'" :\ ----------- --- Single famIly homes - Located east of Rainbow Dnve, adjacent to the Centennial Apartments _... ......,-/tJ-do Date Recelv.,., / Planner DR REVIEW PROCESS The proposed Metro Plan Amendment IS a Type II Amendment because It IS located Inside the city limits and IS site specific \ The City Council Initiated this Plan Amendment on Apnl21st, 2008 Notice was mailed to Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) and to both Lane County and City of Eugene Planning Directors on Apnl 24th, 2008 Notice of the public heanng date and notice of the was mailed out on May 14th, 2008 to property owners within 300 feet of the proposed zone change per Section 52-115 (a)(1)-(14) of the SDC Public notice of the heanng was published In the local newspaper (Register Guard) on May 26th, 2008, as required In Section 5 2-115(8) of the SDC Since thiS application was Initiated by the City CouncIl, Staff conducted a neighborhood meeting regarding the application on May 29th, 2008 Two property owners attended the meeting - one owned property Within the subject area, and the other owned property Just west of the subject area No concerns were raised However, the two attendees asked questions related to the application Staff answered questions and discussed the process In detail With the attendees No wntten comments from any cItizens receiving notice were submitted at the time of ISSUing thiS report METRO PLAN DESIGNATION. The subject property is designated LDR as shown In the Metro Plan diagram The subject property IS not part of any approved Refinement Plan SpeCific Findings related to the Metro Plan are discussed In thiS report METRO PLAN DIAGRAM AMENDMENT CRITERIA OF APPROVAL - SDC 5.14-135 (C)(1) and (2) "The follOWing cntena shall be applied by the City CounCil In approving or denYing a Metro Plan amendment application 1 The amendment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide planning goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission, and 2 Adoption of/he amendment must not make the Metro Plan Intemally inconsistent CRITERIA OF APPROVAL - sec 514-135 (C)(1) 1 The amendment must be consistent With the relevant Statewide planning goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO GOAL 1 Goal 1 - CItizen Involvement To develop a cItIzen Involvement program that Insures the opportumty for cItizens to be Involved In all phases of the planmng process LRP100B-OOOOB I - ....\If.;..~ II <:)J~_ >1C' 1 Jilt 1si\ t Date Received. Planner. DR 1 /{ o/Ot, Finding 1: Goal 1 addresses the need to develop a citizen Involvement program to ensure citizen Involvement In all phases of the land use planning process The Planning Commission and the City Council will hold public heanngs and accept testimony on the proposal Through the procedures established by the City, cllizens have received notice of hearings In a generally published local paper (e g Register Guard) and have the opportunity to be heard regarding the proposed diagram amendment Notice of the public hearings was also given In accordance With SDC requirements to property owners Within 300 feet of the proposed Plan Map Amendment Since the proposed amendment complies With the City's citizen Involvement program and citizens have opportunities to be Involved In the procedure, the proposed amendment IS consistent With Goal 1 STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 2' Goal2 Land Use Plannmg To establish a land use plannmg process and policy framework as a basIs for all decIsIon and actIons related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for such decIsIons and actIons Finding 2 Goal 2 requires that local comprehensive plans be consistent With the Goals, that local comprehensive plans be Internally conSistent, and that Implementing ordinances be consistent With acknowledged comprehensive plans Goal 2 also reqUires that land use deCISions be coordinated With affected JUriSdictions and that they be supported by an adequate factual base As required In SDC Section 514-125, the City IS reqUired to give referral nolice of the proposed Type II Metro Plan diagram amendment to the City of Eugene and Lane County so they may determine If there are grounds to partiCipate as parties to the hearing The City also sends the statutorily required notice of the Initial public hearing 45 days In advance to the state Department of land Conservalion and Development, ensuring that they are given opportunity for comment and review conformity to applicable statewide planning goals The Metro Plan and the SDC, as well as the Statewide Planning Goals and applicable statutes, proVide poliCies and criteria for the evaluation of comprehensive plan amendments Compliance With these measures assures an adequate factual base for approval of the proposed Metro Plan diagram amendment As discussed elsewhere In thiS document, the proposed map amendment IS consistent With the Metro Plan and the Goals By demonstraling such compliance, the amendments satisfy the consistency element of Goal 2 STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 3 Goal 3 - Agncultural Land To preserve and mamtam agnculturallands Finding 3 ThiS goal IS Inapplicable because as prOVided In OAR 660-15-000(3), Goal 3 applies only to rural agricultural lands The subject properties are located Within an acknowledged urban growth boundary, are InSide Springfield's corporate limits, and are not been In agricultural use j..!=.,,:...... ~ .. ~ iC .1 '.l'j~il, lRP2008-{)OOOB Date ReceIved '7 -1'0 -o'l Planner DR STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 4' Goal 4 - Forest Land To conserve forest lands by maintaining the forest land base and to protect the state's forest economy by making pOSSIble economIcally efficIent forest practIces that assure the continuous growing and harvesting of forest tree specIes as the leading use on forest land consIstent WIth sound management of SOIl, aIr, water, and fIsh and WIldlIfe resources and to prOVIde for recreatIonal oppOrtUnitIes and agnculture Finding 4. Goal 4 does not apply Within urban growth boundaries, per OAR 660-06-0020, and the area affected by the proposed Plan amendment IS InSide Springfield's acknowledged UGB STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 5 Goal 5 - Open Spaces, Scenic and Hlstonc Area, and Natural Resources To conserve open space and protect natural and scenic resources Finding 5 Goal 5 requires local governments to protect a variety of open space, sceniC, hiStOriC, and natural resource values Goal 5 and Its Implementing rule, OAR Ch 660, DIvIsion 16, require planning JUrisdictions, at acknowledgment and as a part of periodiC reView, to (1) Idenlify such resources, (2) determine their quality, quantity, and location, (3) Identify conflicting uses, (4) examine the economiC, SOCial, environmental, and energy (ESEE) consequences that could result from allOWing, limiting, or prohibiting the conflicting uses, and (5) develop programs to resolve the conflicts The subject properties are not on Springfield's acknowledged Metro Plan Goal 5 Inventory No threatened or endangered species have been inventOried on the Site, and no archeological or Significant historical Inventoried resources are located on the site The National Wetland Inventory and Springfield Local Wetland Inventory maps have been consulted and there are no JUrisdictional wetlands located on the site Therefore, the proposed amendment does not alter the City's compliance With Goal 5 STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 6 Goal 6 - AIr, Water and Land Resources QualIty To maintain and Improve the quality of the aIr, water and land resources of the state Finding 6: The purpose of Goal 6 IS to maintain and Improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state Generally, Goal 6 reqUires that development comply With applicable state and federal air and water quality standards In the context of the proposed Metro Plan diagram amendment, Goal 6 requires that the applicant demonstrate that It IS reasonable to expect that applicable state and federal environmental quality standards can be met f , \.t -. .-:J )1'"/_ lRP200B-00008 _ , ,~h ''if ~h, Date Received _7'/ I 0 - ()'l, Planner DR The proposed Plan Map Amendment does not modify any of the Goal 6 related policies of the Metro Plan, nor do they amend the Regional Transportation Plan, the Spnngfield Development Code, other applicable Goal 6 policies, or any regulations Implementing those policies The subject property is located outside the Zone of Contnbutlon and outside any of the Time of Travel Zones, which are regulated by the Dnnklng Water Protection Overlay Distnct The proposed amendment does not alter the City's compliance with Goal 6 STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 7 Goal 7 - Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards To protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards Finding 7 Goal 7 requires that development subject to damage from natural hazards and disasters be planned and/or constructed with appropnate safeguards and mitigation The goal also requires that plans be based on an inventory of known areas of natural disaster and hazards, such as areas prone to landslides, flooding, etc Staff has reViewed the natural constraints map and the FEMA Floodplain Map In relation to the subject area The subject area IS not Included In the City's Inventory of known areas of natural hazards The site IS flat and not subject to landslide hazards, and IS located well outside of any established FEMA flood hazard area Therefore, approval of the proposed Plan Amendment will not alter the City's acknowledged compliance With Goal 7 through ItS adopted plans, codes and procedures STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 8 Goal 8 - Recreation Needs To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and VIsitors and, where appropnate, to proVIde for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including destination resorts Finding 8 Goal 8 requires local governments to plan and provide for the siting of necessary recreational faCilities to "satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and vISitors," and where appropnate, provide for the siting of recrealional faCilities Including destination resorts Staff has consulted the Willamalane 20-year Parks and Recreation ComprehenSIVe Plan In relation to Goal 8 compliance The Wlllamalane 20- year Parks and Recreation ComprehenSIve Plan was adopted by the City of Spnngfield as part of the Metro Plan's compliance With Goal 8 None of the vanous studies, Inventones, and facilities plans regarding recreational faCilities In the adopted Willamalane 20-year Parks and Recreation ComprehenSive Plan have deSignated the subject site for parks and open space in an adopted Inventory, declared It a Significant resource, or slated It for acquIsition The proposed Plan Map Amendment does not alter the City'S compliance With Goal 8 STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 9 Goal 9 - Economic Development To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a vanety of economic activities VItal to the health, welfare, and prospenty of Oregon's citizens q"'-. - .._~t8'.lk"J.,1~r ,- .. '. LRP100lUJOOoB ,', r, Date Received '"7-,'O-()"6 Planner DR Finding 9. Goal 9 requires the city to provide adequate opportunities for a variety of economic activities vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of the Citizens The proposed amendment to the Metro Plan diagram Will not affect the city's capacity for economic development, and does not alter the City's compliance with Goal 9 STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO GOAL 10 Goa/10 - Housmg To provIde for the housmg needs of cItIzens of the state Finding 10: LCOC's Housing goal reqUires cllles to maintain adequate supplies of bUildable lands for needed housing, based on an acknowledged Inventory of bUildable lands The 1999 Eugene-Spnngfleld Metropolitan Area ReSidential Land and Housing Study IS Springfield's most current adopted housing study related to Goal 10 The City of Springfield IS also currently undergOing a new Resldenllal Lands Study which analyzes housing Inventory and need for the next 20 years Preliminary findings of that study have shown that there IS a need for addlllonal hOUSing Within the planning penod Some of that need can be met through Increasing denSity of eXisting resldenllal zones The proposed Plan Map Amendment would Increase allowable denSity levels Within the subject area, thus proViding more hOUSing opllons for Springfield reSidents The subject area IS pnmarlly zoned MOR, and IS currently bUilt to mostly MOR denSity levels The follOWing table Illustrates the on-site denSity levels I I EXisting Zoning LOR MOR MOR I EXISTING CONDITIONS EXIsting Development Type SIngle Family Multi-Family' SmQle Famllv TOTAL ACRES OF SITE Acres 092 714 073 8791 . Note - EXisting bUild-out MDR development on site IS as follows BI-Centennlal Condos = 17 Units per/acre, Rainbow Village Apartments = 15 6 Units per/acre I POTENTIAL ACREAGE FOR INCREASE IN DENSITY I I Existing ZOning EXisting Development Type Acres I ILDR Single Family 092 MDR SmQle Famllv 0 73 POTENTIAL ACRES AVAILABLE FOR INCREASE IN DENSITY 1 65 As listed In the table above, the proposed Plan Map Amendment would have a marginal effect of Increased denSity on 1 65 acres, as most of the subject area IS already zoned and bUilt to MOR denSity levels The very slight Increase In estimated denSity that would result from redevelopment of the 1 65 acres at Increased denSity would have no measurable effect on the overall CitYWide hOUSing Inventory Given thiS fact, the lRP1008-00008 1//0-(/!- Date ReceIVed. Planner. DR proposed Plan Map Amendment does not affect Springfield's continued compliance with Goal 10 STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 11 Goal 11 - Public FaCilities and Services To plan and develop a timely, orderly and effiCient arrangement of public faCilities and services as a framework for urban and rural development OAR 660-011-0005(7)(a)-(d) Deflmtlon of Public FaCilities (a) Water (b) Samtary Sewer (c) Storm sewer (d) Transportation Fmdmg 11. ThiS goal requires the provIsion of a timely, orderly and effiCient arrangement of public facIlities and services The subject area IS located within the Springfield UGB and city limits, and IS already designated for urban levels of use The proposed amendment to the Plan map designations from LDR to MDR Will not affect the abIlity to proVide needed services since all the required urban services are available to support eXisting or future commercial uses on the subject site The Metro Plan and associated faCIlity plans have been acknowledged to conform to Goal 11 ensuring that public facIlities and services are currently available to the subject site The proposed Plan Map Amendment IS on "Inflll" property, which currently has city services available to the site As mentioned previously In thiS report, the majority of the subject area IS already zoned MDR and bUilt out to MDR density levels Any Significant redevelopment In the area Will be subject to an In depth review of public faCIlities and services based upon a development proposal The Plan Map Amendment proposal does not affect the Metro Plan's compliance With Goal 11 STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 12 Goal 12 - Transportation To proVide and encourage a safe, convement and economic transportation system Finding 12. Goal 12 requires local governments to provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economical transportation system The proposed map amendment Involves approximately 8 79 acres of property, of which the majority IS zoned MDR and currently bUilt-out to medium density levels Inslltute of Transportation Engmeers (ITE) trip generation rates for eXisting and potential uses are as follows I Use I Single Family Housing ITE Code 210 I Apartments ITE Code 220 I CondolTownhouse ITE Code 230 PM Peak Hour TrIps/D U 1 01 Dally TrIps/D U 957 062 672 052 586 - --. - ,.... _ L;.SlJfUJ:'" sJc\...J ..;.to 18(:1151'-: lJI.P200B-OOOOB Date ReceIved 7 -IO-OZ Planner DR A comparison of trip generation from the 1 65 acres available for development at mcreased density with 28 apartments (17 D U lacre) Instead of 7 single family residences (4 D U lacre) IS shown In the following table I Use I Apartments ITE Code 220 I Single Family Housing ITE Code 210 I Difference PM Peak Hour 28 X 062 = 17 Trips Dally 28 X6 72 = 188 Trips 7 X 1 01 = 7 Trips 7 X 9 57 = 67 Trips 10 Trips 121 Trips Adopted mobility standards that apply to transportation facIlities servmg the subject site are based on traffic operations dUrlrlg the PM Peak Hour per TransPlan TSI Roadway Poltcy #2 Motor Vehicle Level of Service The very slight Increase In eslimated PM Peak Hour trip generalion (10 trips) that would result from development of the 1 65 acres at Increased denSity would have no measurable effect on transportation facilities Any significant Intensification of development Will be subject to development review to assure eXisting transportation capacity IS not exceeded The proposed Plan Map Amendment IS consistent With Goal 12 and applicable locallmplementmg poliCies STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 13 '" Goal 13 . Energy ConservatIon To conserve energy Land and uses developed on the land shall be managed and controlled so as to maximIze the conservatIOn of all forms of energy, based upon sound economIc pnnclples Fmdmg 13 The Energy goal IS a general planning goal and prOVides limited gUidance for site-specific map amendments The proposed amendment has no direct impact on energy conservation, though It would In fact Will promote greater energy effiCiency by enabling future redevelopment at medium denSity levels wlthm the subject area Therefore, the proposed amendment is consistent With, and does not alter the City's continued compliance With Goal 13 STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 14. Goal 14 - Urbamzatlon To prOVIde for an orderly and effICient transItIon from rural to urban land use Fmdmg 14 Goal 14 reqUires local JUrisdictions to provide for an "orderly and effiCient tranSition from rural to urban land use" The subject area IS Within the UGB and the city limits of Sprmgfield, and Within an eXlstmg urbanized area of the community Therefore, Goal 14 is not applicable to thiS application STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 15 Goal 15 - Wlllamette RIVer Greenway To protect, conserve, enhance and mamtam the natural, scemc, hlstoncal, agncultural, economIc and recreatIonal qualities of lands along the Willamette River as the Wlllamette River Greenway Fmdmg 15 Goal 15 does not apply to the subject Plan Map Amendment appllcalion because the subject area IS not located Within the Wlllamette River Greenway lRP200B-OOOOB.}B':" ", - f' . '1C' l'"ll 1t 1 I. l~~ Date Received. 7 -'I D'- 5/, Planner DR STAFF'S FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOALS 16-19 Goal 16 through 19 (Estuanne Resources, Coastal Shore/ands, Beaches and Dunes, and Ocean Resources) FlDdlDg 16 The subject site IS not located within any coastal, ocean, estuarrne, or beach and dune resources related area Goals 16-19 do not apply to this Plan Map Amendment application CRITERIA OF APPROVAL - SDC 5.14-135 (C)(2) 2 Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan intemally inconsistent STAFFS FINDINGS RELATED TO 514-135 (C)(2): FlDdlDg 17 The applicatIOn requests amendment of the Metro Plan diagram from LOR to MOR for approximately 8 79 acres This section of the application narrative addresses the consistency of the amendment With the applicable policies of the Metro Plan, to demonstrate that adoption of the amendment will not make the Metro Plan Internally Inconsistent (as reqUired by the approval crrterra In SOC 5 14-135 (C)(2) This narrative only addresses those policies that apply to the proposal, and does not discuss those portions of the Metro Plan that (1) apply only to rural or other lands outside of the urban growth boundary, (2) apply to land uses other than the current or proposed designations for the site and will not be affected by the proposed Plan diagram amendment, or (3) clearly apply only to specific development applications (e g , site plan review submittals or subdiVISions) In many Instances the goals, policies and Implementation measures apply to specific development proposals that will be addressed through compliance With applicable City regulations durrng site plan review of any given future redevelopment proposal The Metro Plan Introduction, Section D provides the following definitions A goal as a broad statement of philosophy that descrrbes the hopes of the people of the community for the future of the community A goal may never be completely attainable, but IS used as a pOint to strrve for An objective IS an attainable target that the community attempts to reach In strrvlng to meet a goal An objective may also be conSidered as an intermediate pOint that will help fulfill the overall goal A policy IS a statement adopted as part of the Plan to prOVide a consistent course of action moving the community towards attainment of ItS goals Except for the Growth Management Goals, which are addressed below, each of the Metro Plan policies are addressed In the order In which they appear In the Plan Element section of the Metro Plan t __'Oft . (e,j(..I""..~. I" il'( U...,f\nf;1 t !RP2008.Q0008 Date Received 7 -, (;; - 0(; Planner DR Fmdmg18 Metro Plan Element Growth Management Policv 1 The urban growth boundary and sequential development shall contmue to be Implemented as an essential means to achieve compact urban growth ProVision of all urban services shall be concentrated mSlde the urban growth boundary The proposed amendment salisfies thiS policy because the subject property IS Inside the UGB and city limits and as such, encourages compact urban growth Also, urban services are available at suffiCient levels to accommodate eXisting development Any significant Intenslficalion of development within the subject area will be subject to development review and will address any need for Increased capacity The City's development review processes ensure that the appropriate level of services IS available to serve future development Fmdmg19 Metro Plan Element A ResidentIal Land Use and Housmg Element Policv A 11 Generally locate higher density resIdentIal development near employment or commercIal servIces, m proximity to major transportatIon systems or wlthm transportation-efficient nodes As previously noted In thiS report, the proposed Plan Map Amendment would have a marginal effect of Increased In density of 1 65 acres, as most of the subject area IS already zoned and bUilt to MDR density levels The very slight Increase In estimated density that would result from redevelopment of the 1 65 acres at Increased density would have no measurable effect on the overall citYWide housing Inventory Given past approvals of medium density level development Within the subject area, and past zoning approvals, It IS clear that the subject area IS appropriate for MDR Plan Designation Several acres located Just southeast of the subject area are zoned and designated Community Commercial, as well an adjacent neighborhood commercial use currently located west of Rainbow Dnve Given these facts, the proposed Plan Amendment IS consistent With Metro Plan PolIcy A 11 PolIcv A 22 Expand opportunities for a mIx of uses m newly developmg areas and eXlstmg neighborhoods through local zonmg and development regulatIons The proposed Map Amendment Will allow eXisting medium density uses to continue to serve residents In the subject area, and Will expand future medium density level redevelopment opportumlies consistent With the above polIcy ':G\I'C\JJ i -1)";~: LRP200B.aOOOB 'I .1, . I" 'P t I "/D-tfb _ .~""'Ivecl. r'lanner. OR Fmdmg 20 C Environmental DesIgn Element Pollcv E 1 In order to promote the greatest possIble degree of diversIty, a broad vanety of commercial, resldentfBl, and recreational land uses shall be encouraged when consistent with other plannmg policies Approval of the proposed map amendment Will add 8 79 acres Into the City'S Inventory of MDR designated land, thereby allOWing for a vanety of needed housing types to occur on Within subject area Long-standing eXisting medium density uses (I e Rainbow Valley Apartments and Bicentennial Apartments) would be allowed to continue Without being considered a Plan I Zone conflict Site, and future redevelopment of the subject area Will serve the needs of Spnngfield's growing populalion, consistent With the above policy Fmdmg 21 F Transportation Element Land Use Pollcv F 3 Provide for transit-supportive land use patterns and development, mcludmg hIgher mtenslty, translt-onented development along major transit comdors and near transIt statIons, medlUm- and high-densIty residential development wlthm one-quarter mile of transit statIOns, major transIt corndors, employment centers, and downtown areas, and development and redevelopment m desIgnated areas that are or could be well served by eXlstmg or planned transtl The proposed map amendment Will enable land use patterns and development consistent With the above policy Approval of the proposal Will allow for higher intensity redevelopment near Centennial Blvd, a major transit COrrIdor EXlsling MDR development In the subject area IS currently served by L TD services along Centennial Blvd Any redevelopment In the subject area at medium density levels Will be serviced by the same publiC transit COrrIdor The proposed Plan Diagram Amendment IS consistent With the above policy Fmdmg 22 G Publtc FaCilIties and Service Element Pollcv G 1 Extend the mmlmum level and full range of key urban fac1litles and servIces m an orderly and effiCient manner consIstent wlIh the growth management polICIes m Chapter II-B, relevant poliCies m thIS chapter and other Metro Plan poltcles The subject property IS located In Spnngfield's city limits and the UGB All necessary Infrastructure and key urban facllllies/servlces are present to serve eXisting development or are available to serve future redevelopment In the subject area subject to site plan review Therefore, the proposal IS consistent With the above policy .... -.... .. ~ - ..... ..~ tdlJlf:'''''; I !.Jls( ;;.~ lGr nt:..!r J LRP1008-00008 PO/ate Recelvea _ '/ -/o-,.{)T anner OR -..:;:p~_ METRO PLAN MAP AMENDMENT CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the request meets the cntena of SDC 514-135 (C)(1) and (2) Upon review of the eVidence provided by staff research, site VISits, eXlsllng structures/uses and review of the applicable cntena of approval, staff finds that proposed Metro Plan Map Amendment IS appropnate for the subject area ",'")."'\ ..., ~I:\- - LRP200B-OOOOB _ - ,,1'1 ;1" l~' II'"'} Date Recelverl 1- ( /y db Planner' DR APPENDIX A SUBJECT PROPERTIES: Journal # LRP2008-00008 MAP TAX ACRES PROPERTY OWNER SITE ADDRESS I LOT 17032734 1700 54 James McAlexander 1398 Rambow Dr I 17032734 1801 02 LoUIS Kennedy / Pame Family Trust 968 W L St I 17032734 1802 02 Adehne Katshen 970WLSt I 17032734 1803 02 Ahce MIlls 972 W L St I 17032734 1804 02 Vicki Mcvay 974 W L St I 17032734 1805 02 Marc SIIvan 976 W L St 1 17032734 1806 02 Fern Verlore Dalby / Kathleen McCoy 978 W L St 17032734 1807 02 Sharon Medart / Ramah Sherrer 980 W L St I 17032734 1808 02 Glona Knudsen 984 W L St 1 17032734 1809 02 Melba Sanders 986 W L St I 17032734 1810 02 Mark McBee / D Krrnberly 988 W L St I 17032734 1811 42 Assoc of Owners of Bl-Centennlal Park I 17032734 1812 02 Karen Lissa Hillyard / Susan Case 990 W L St I 17032734 1813 02 Gayle Hamlett / Leon & Gayle Hamlett Trust 992 W L St I 17032734 1814 02 Jeanne Lovaasen 994 WLSt 1 17032734 1815 02 Ruth Onsum 996 W L St I 17032734 1816 02 Susan Gleason / JudIth Ott 998 W L St I 17032734 1817 02 Clara Force 1000 W L St I 17032734 1818 02 Susan Enkson 1002WLSt I 17032734 1819 02 Lola GIlleSPIe 1004 WLSt 1 17032734 1820 02 Mary Howard 1006 W L St I 17032734 1821 02 Lounetta Blarr 1008WLSt I 17032734 1822 02 Edward LUCier 1012 W L St 1 17032734 1823 02 Pamela Hlg~ms 1014 W L St 17032734 1824 02 Janet Strobel 1016WLSt I 17032734 1825 02 Karen Snyder 1018WLSt I 17032734 1826 54 Phlhp & LoUIS Shelley 1010 WL St I 17032734 1900 19 Cora Jones / Robert Cook 942 W L St I 17032734 2000 22 Bertha Berkshrre 1392 Rambow Dr I 17032734 2100 25 Lonne & Jill Morse 901 WLSt I 17032734 2300 25 Vernon Haagenson 941 WLSt I 17032734 2400 26 Phlhp Dunn 957,959,971,973 WL St I 17032734 2401 20 Patnck Mekech 945 G St I 17032734 2402 33 Phlhp Dunn 1003,1005,1017,1019 W L St I 17032734 2602 511 Rambow VIllage Inc 1250 Rambow Dr, Apts 1-80 I TOTAL ACRES 8.79 Date Received 7 -/o-6K Planner DR ATTACHMENT 2 - 17 BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD RECOMMENDATION FOR A METRO PLAN DIAGRAM AMENDMENT + + + RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL + CASE NO. LRP2008-00008 FINDING, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS NATURE OF THE APPLICATION The apphcant requests approval to change the map deSignatIOn on the Metropohtan Area General Plan ("Metro Plan") DIagram from Low DenSity ReSidential (LDR) to MedIUm DenSity ReSIdentIal (MDR) for approxunately 8 79 acres located near Ramhow Dnve The current Metro Plan DIagram deSignates properties m the subject area as LDR, wlule the eXistIng zonmg and much of the development of the area IS pnmanly MDR ThtS Plan/Zone confhct IS the result of the adoptIOn of the present Metro Plan diagram (c 2004) wluch deSignates these properties LDR even though all prevIOus actIOns by the Plannmg COnUntSSlOn and City CouncIl estabhshed MDR as the app.vpuate deSignatIon for thtS area. Given the hlStOIY of past development and zone change approvals m the area, the Spnngfield City CouncIl mltIated thiS Plan Diagram Amendment from LDR to MDR for the subject area The subject site IS located on apprOlomately 8 79 acres IdentIfied as Tax Lots 1700, 1801-1826, 1900,2000,2100,2300,2400,2401,2402,2602 on Assessor's Map No 17-03-27-34 1 The Spnngfield City CounCil voted unanunously on Apnl21 ",2008 to mlttate a Metro Plan Diagram Amendment for properties m the subject area. 2 The apphcatIon was mlttated m accordance With SectIOn 5 14-120 of the Spnngfield Development Code TImely and suffiCient notIce of the pubhc heanng, per SectIon 5 2-115 (a)(I)-(14) of the Spnngfield Development Code, has been proVided 3 On May 29th, 2008, City Staff conducted a Netghborhood Meettng Two property owners attended the meettng - one property owner wltlun the subject area, and the other property owner JUst west of the subject area No concerns were raised 4 On June 17th, 2008 a pubhc heanng on the Plan Diagram Amendment request was held The Development Servtces Department staff notes mcludmg cntena of approval, fmdmgs and recommendatIons, together With the testImony and submittals of the persons tesbfymg at that heanng have been conSidered and are part of the record of thiS proceedmg CONCLUSION On the basIS of thiS record, the proposed amendment IS consistent With the cntena of SectIOn SDC 5 14- 135(C)(1)-(2) of the Spnngfield Development Code This general fmdmg IS supported by the specIfic fmdmgs of fact and conclUSions m the attached staff report and attached hereto RECOMMENDATION It IS RECOMMENDED by the Plannmg CommiSSIOn of Spnngfield that Case Number LRP2008-00008 be forwarded to the Spnngfield City CouncIl for APPROVAL Tlus RECOMMENDATION was presented to and approved by the Plannmg CommiSSIOn on June 17,2008 ~/f Viinmiig Connmsslon Charrperson ATTEST: AYES NOES ABSENT ABSTAIN {p I =k Date ReceIved 7 -/c;- 6'6 Planner DR I .~~ OF SPRINGFIELD DATE OF NOTICE' July 10th, 2007 July 7th, 2007 DATE OF DECISION JOURNAL NUMBER. LRP2008-00008 APPLICANT City of Spnngfield I NATURE OF REQUEST The Springfield City Council initiated a Metro Plan Map Amendment from Low DenSity Residential (LDR) to Medium DenSity Residential (MDR) This PlanlZone conflict was the result of the adoption of the present Metro Plan diagram (c 2004) which deSignated these properties LDR even though all prevIous actions by the City Council established MDR as the appropnate deSignation for this area I LOCATION OF PROPERTY IThe subject site IS located on approximately 8 79 acres Identified as Tax Lots 1700, 1801- 1826,1900,2000,2100,2300,2400,2401,2402,2602 on Assessor's Map No 17-03-27-34 I DECISION On June 17th, 2008 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Plan Diagram Amendment request The Planning Commission deliberated and voted 6 In favor, 0 opposed, and 1 absent to forward a recommendation of approval to the Spnngfield City Council On July 7th, 2008 the City Council held a public hearing to receive testimony and hear comments on this proposal The City Council voted 4 In favor, 0 opposed, and 2 absent, adopting Ordinance Number 6223 amending the Metro Plan Diagram I APPEAL Pursuant to ORS 197 830(2)(b), a notice of Intent to appeal may be filed With the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) by those who appeared before the local government, special dlstnct or state agency orally or In wntlng If you Wish to appeal, you must file a notice of Intent to appeal With the LUBA no later than 21 days from the date the deCISion was mailed to you by the local government Copies of the notice of Intent to appeal must be served upon the local government and others who received written notice of the final deCISion from the local government. The notice of Intent to appeal must be served and filed In the fonn and manner prescribed by LUBA, (OAR Chapter 66a, DIVISion 100 Please call LUBA at 503-373-1265, If you have questions about appeal procedures I QUESTIONS If you have any questions concerning thiS matter, please contact DaVid Reesor, Planner III at 541 726 3783 ,- JCvv-z,/7 "': . :.-- DaVid Reesor, Planner III Date Received. 7 -/0 - 6'6 Planner DR dx. US Alrblll Express ,,:::.~ 86.:j1 N"mbar 0757 8976 rom~pmundprashllfTf Sender'sFedEx 20GB Account Number 1054-A08::h~ .m Julv 10. 9I1det's arne Reesor. DaVld pho",('i41 V26-1610 ,m"""CITY OF SPRlNGFLD/DEI,I S\ C', idress 225 N 5TH 5T 0_ ",SPRINGFIELD "'" OR ZIP 97477-4671 our Internal BdlmQ Reference st24cn!l'lC\a'S.....'pPllaroniiM.:t' QPTl!HJAL , eClplent's ,me Plan Amendment Sueelalist Pho"IS03 ]73-0050 JmoallV Denartment of Land Conservatlon & Dp.velonment eClplent's ddress 635 Ca"Q1tol Street~ NE~ S111tP. 1'10 ,cann<lldel_\I>PObausorPOZIPcodos. "'fib."".',,,," ddress ~u..l,p.ekag.b.h.ld.t''II.clflcF.dE<loc'U.n.PMlFsde..ddr'$'"er' '" Salem "'" OR ZIP97301-2'i40 0368751909 A~""''?''!Jo4i'"'''''''' ,_{,:-"~,.m;e'",,,>~,r "'~'0 <+t:"',"*i,~~',"' "^0'~;A'$>"""'"""ij l!li"'" " """-j ~ It~~lp-;~!!~i!t~,~~,jJ~!Jl!ti~:i!~~elJw~q,T:,~~~~~i,!,4:', gJSII!1PL"Y Y~~!PPI!,g ,,:!.n~~\',Y~.!lr;,!l~c,~~nt ~P~'!J\s .~,~h!'J~o!~,yo,o!,,!ed : 4a Express Package Service nt'1 ~~~~~r;.o~2V~~ht 0 ~~~~~:~vemlght ~'I"pmer~.....lb.d.I"'.,"donMond'v SatunJliyO.I"'"'VNOTava~'tMe unlo..SATlJRDAYDeliwr;"..._ O FedEx2Day ~'=n~':ueb:~~":;land"Y unIessSATURDAYDoIrver;,s,elec!lld L- FedEx~"o"ral8na',,,",I.bleM,,,,"",,,,ch,,,,,..One-",,,,nd,"l.-----.-l Packages up to 1501bs. O FedExRrstOvemlg!Tt Eao'"<tnOll1bu$msoJllOll1O'\\l ..Iivor;tn....etloc.ban$. SaturdayOeiOloryNOT...ifablo O FedExExpressSaver Th,rdO.weurley Satutdll'fOel"'"'VNOT....oJ1oblo. Q T.__ 4b Express freight Service o ~~~p':l:r.e~: sh'1W"emslOillbede""e,od.nMondoy unIessSATlJAOAYM""'oy,...I....d. c.UJa,Cr. o f;~t!~~re~~rsd'~ Ihprnenl!wiI"d~anM""d"'l Lf'IIM!SATlJAOAYDelriOlYIS....ated. Packages aver 1511Jbs. o ~~~:r:~lght So1IurOayD""""YNDTmioblo ..T._I","..'..... 5 Packagmg eM F,dEx '-A Envelope" D D fn~I~~~~~IPS" 0 FedEx FedExLalll.P.....dFedEils.tJ.>cdyP.l Box FedEx DOtller Tube Oeclar&dv.Iu,IIIT1ItS!m 6 Special Handling I Include FedEle addless 'n Sect,en 3 I o ~~ri~~I~~I~~~I:ery D ~tO~~~~~~~ 0 ~O~~~:Jon ~:=~~l.~... =:a~a:~or ~~~=~~.oo Save'o,FedEx30'vfrBl~ht FedEx2D.y!tl..l&etloc.~ Doesllllsshlplllllnlcontamdallgerousgoads? One box mu,l be checked I D X;;O..llaChed 0 ~e'lJspor"Docla<mlllll 0 ~~.~CilJN'B45 _'_kg Shqlp.r'tOocl.,anan nolr"'lU"". 0 Den\lOlWSlI"'Jd,rOl(:ludirlQdr;"'olcamltbo"'ppedI1FedEx~t~l1g Cargo AJrcraft Only 7 Payment B~ EnlarF<edExJkttNII.rxCrednCaldN[l.ff)gw. ~ III Sender D ReCipient 0 ThlrdParty 0 CredltCard 0 Cash/ChecK ~ctNtl.mSac\lOn 1 willOeb,l.d. I ONo FedE:<Ac<:l.No. Crodllc"rdrlo b, "~ ToIal Packages Total Weight Total DeclaredValuet $ 00 IOull..bi<tylSirr<ted!tl$100Lll1ll>Styoodeolaro.h,ghe<valu..Soebockfordetads.BVUSDlgltuA.M\IIluogr..ta!M S8MC.,ood"'<u11anlh.bec~oflh"A.blll.nd,"lhocIJml!1lFodE>Se""c.G",d. ,ncludln<ltenn!IIl"'-lrMaurllllb1ltv 8 Residential Delivery Signature Options ~'/OU~qu""a!ogn'lUIn clleckO""ctOllmbroct. No Signature o ~.~a~~~~VboIOft 'MlI1autObllllurtQ" "fP'WItI""~ R..O.t010l06-PlrtIISlll79<l1994-2006FedEx-PRINTIDINUSASRS OlrectSlgnature Osomeono31roCIplWS .ddro,"mll'fSlgnlor dohvooyfec"Pp!r= IndlrectSI!lnature O~""ano"'\r.;r'bIO'l roc'llIenr..ddress,sorneono allnolOJhbcnng.ddroosmay SIOJ.bdol"'"'Ymapp!re>. 15191