Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication Applicant 7/2/2024City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW — TYPE 2 ❑ Site Plan Review Completeness Check ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal ❑ Final Site Plan Submittal Applicant Name: Bill Childs Company: Land Baron Holdings LLC Address: 1089 28th Street Springfield OR 97478 Applicant's Rep: Jed Truett, AICP, Principal Planner company: MetroPlanning SPRINGFIELD1k - Phone: Email: Phone: 541-302-9830 Email: jed@metroplanning.com Address: 846 A Street, Springfield OR 97477 Property Owner: Bill Childs and Thomas Boone P one: Company: Land Baron Holdings, 1089 28th Street, 97478 Email: Address: 11372 Pyramid Ct, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-31-22 TAX LOT NO(S): 01300 & 00900 Property Address (if applicable): 1089 28th Street, Springfield OR 97478 Size of Property:.43 acres Q Acres Units Per Acre: n Sq. Ft. Proposed Project Name: Approval of Site Review for Automotive Shop Proposal: Approval of Site Review- Case #811 -21 -000447 -COD Additional compliance requirements- Case #21 -000448 -COD Existing Use: Vehicle Repair Shop New Impervious Area (Sq. Ft.): 18,898 Sq. Ft. Associated Applications: Placard: Case No: Application Fee: $ TOTAL FEE: $ 1 Date: Reviewed By: Tech Fee: $ Notice Fee: $ --TPROJECT NO: Signatures The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate. Applicant: Signature Print Date: If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. Owner: z Date: gnature S L-, . , Print Type 2 — Site Plan Review Application Process A. A Type 2 application involves the Director's interpretation and exercise of discretion when evaluating approval standards. Uses or development evaluated through this process are uses that are conditionally permitted or allowed after Director review that may require the imposition of conditions of approval to ensure compliance with development and approval standards. (SDC 5.1.415(A)). B. A Type 2 decision is made by the Director after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed. A Type 2 application is reviewed according to the procedures below, unless the Director determines that the application should be reviewed as a Type 3 decision. A Type 2 decision may be appealed according to SDC 5.1.800. (SDC 5.1.415(B)). C. When application materials are over 20 pages in length, an applicant must provide an identical electronic version and hard copy of the submitted materials. (SDC 5.1.215(B)(2)). 1. Site Plan Review Completeness Check Meeting • The purpose of the completeness check meeting is to determine whether the proposed development application is complete prior to acceptance of the application for processing by the City. A complete application is required for the review process. • The completeness check meeting will examine if the submittal standards of SDC 5.1.220 and 5.17.115 are met. • A completeness check meeting is required for all Type 2 and 3 land use applications. • Completeness Check Meetings are typically held within five to seven working days of application submittal. • The application must conform with Application Submittal Standards in SDC 5.1.220, the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements found in the SDC 5.17.155, and the Checklist provided in this form below. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Completeness Check Meeting • The applicant, owner, and associated design team are strongly encouraged to attend the Completeness Check meeting, however it is not required. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. • The Case Planner provides the applicant with a Completeness Check Meeting Checklist specifying items required to make the application complete. • The applicant has 180 days to submit a complete Site Plan Review application to the city; a second Completeness Check meeting is required after the 180 days. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application 3 • The application must conform with the Application Submittal Standards in SDC 5.1.220, the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements found in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.17.155, and the Checklist provided below. • An application will be reviewed for completeness in accordance with SDC 5.1.405. • A Type 2 decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 12 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official, as applicable. 4 Type 2 - Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist Please Note: • All the following items MUST be submitted. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why in the attached narrative. • When application or appeal materials are over 20 pages in length, an applicant must provide an identical electronic version and hard copy of the submitted materials. ❑ Site Plan Review Application Form ❑ Application Fee - Refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. ❑ An electronic copy of all application materials (USB drive or other) submitted at the time of application (if total submittal package is over 20 pages). ❑ Proof of ownership, e.g., deed or other recorded document ❑ Concurrent applications where a proposal involves more than one (1) application ❑ State or Federal Permit Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Completed Attached Stormwater Scoping Sheet One (1) Hard Copy of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: ❑ Application materials must be submitted as required below in addition to the requirements in SDC 5.1.220, Application Submittal Standards. Applications that do not include all the necessary information may be deemed incomplete in accordance with SDC 5.1.225, Acceptance of Application. Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents • The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or in part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. • Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. ❑ General Requirements. See SDC 5.17.115(A). 5 ❑ Be prepared by a design professional, licensed in the state of Oregon, when required by state law, such as an engineer, architect, landscape architect, land surveyor, or other qualified professional as determined by the Director; ❑ Be drawn to scale with the scale indicated on the plans, and the scale sized appropriately for the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan related to the approval standards; ❑ Include a north arrow and date of preparation and/or revision; ❑ Provide the physical address of the subject property, if applicable, and the County assessor's tax map and lot number; ❑ Provide the names and addresses of all persons listed as owners on the most recently recorded deed; ❑ Provide the name, address, email address, and telephone number of any person that assisted in preparing the application materials or plans; and ❑ Show the size of the property and development area in acres or square feet. ❑ Existing Conditions Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(6)). The application must include an existing site conditions plan that shows, for the entire property and the surrounding property to a distance of 150 feet from the subject property boundaries: ❑ The property boundaries, dimensions, and gross area; ❑ Topographic contour lines at one -foot intervals for slopes equal to or less than ten percent and at two -foot intervals for slopes greater than ten percent; ❑ The location and width of all public and private streets, drives, sidewalks, pathways, rights-of-way, and easements; ❑ Potential natural hazard areas, including areas mapped by the City, County, or State as having a potential for geologic hazards; ❑ Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; ❑ Resource areas, including wetlands on the City's Local Wetlands Inventory, streams, surface mines, and wildlife habitat identified by the City or any natural resource regulatory agencies as requiring protection; ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow, and top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map and their riparian areas; ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision; ❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3.200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department; 11 ❑ Features, including existing structures, pavement, large rock outcroppings, drainage ways, canals and ditches; ❑ The location, size and species of trees and other vegetation having a caliper (diameter) of six inches or greater at four feet above grade; and ❑ Locally or federally designated historic and cultural resources ❑ Proposed Site Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(C)). ❑ The proposed development site, including boundaries, dimensions, and gross area; ❑ Existing site features, including trees, identified on the site analysis map, if any, which are proposed to be retained, removed, or modified by the proposed development; ❑ The location and dimensions of all existing and proposed structures, utilities, pavement, and other improvements on the site and adjacent to the site for a distance of 150 feet; ❑ Setback dimensions for all existing and proposed buildings; ❑ Loading and service areas for waste disposal, loading, and delivery; and ❑ Outdoor recreation spaces, common areas, plazas, outdoor seating, street furniture, and similar improvements ❑ Utility and Improvement Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(D)). The application must include a utility and improvement plant that shows: ❑ The name and location of all existing and proposed public and private streets within or on the boundary of the proposed development site including the right-of-way and paving dimensions, and the ownership and maintenance status; ❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, streetlights, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities; ❑ The location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails; ❑ The location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and communications connections including cable, internet, and television cable, etc.; ❑ The proposed connection points of the proposed utilities; and ❑ The location and size of existing and proposed easement and public dedications ❑ Landscape Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(E)). ❑ Existing and proposed building and pavement outlines; ❑ The location and dimensions of existing and proposed terraces, retaining walls, decks, patios, shelters, and play areas; ❑ Existing and proposed abutting street right-of-way landscaping; 7 ❑ Screening as specified in SDC 4.4.110; ❑ Plantings, either existing or proposed, used in erosion control and stormwater treatment facilities; ❑ Details of a permanent irrigation system, unless specifically exempted as specified in SDC 4.4.100; ❑ Street trees as specified in SDC 4.2.140; ❑ A specifications list for all landscaping materials to be used; ❑ A planting schedule containing the location, size, and species of the existing and proposed plant materials (at time of planting); ❑ The anticipated size of all proposed plants at two years, or at maturity, whichever is first; and ❑ A description of planting methods as specified in SDC 4.4.100 ❑ Access, Circulation, Parking, and Lighting Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(F)). ❑ The location, dimensions and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, landscaped areas, wheel bumpers, directional signs and striping; ❑ The location and dimensions of all site circulation for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles including entrances and exits to the site, and loading and service areas; ❑ Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways and driveways proposed to be closed; ❑ On-site lighting including the location, orientation, and maximum height of all proposed exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached. ❑ For lighting, the type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and the type of illumination, the wattage, luminous area, and a photometric test report for each light source; ❑ The location, type, number, and dimensions of all bicycle parking spaces; ❑ The amount of gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use; ❑ The location of off-street loading areas; ❑ Existing and proposed transit facilities; ❑ A copy of a Right-of-way Approach Permit application, where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility; and ❑ A Traffic Impact Study prepared by an Oregon Licensed Traffic Engineer when required by and as specified in SDC 4.2.105(A)(4). ❑ Grading, Paving, and Stormwater Management Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(G)). ❑ Stormwater management system for the entire development area; 8 ❑ The roof drainage patterns and discharge locations; ❑ The pervious and impervious area drainage patterns; ❑ The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainage ways to be retained; and ❑ The existing and proposed elevations, site grades, and contours ❑ Phased Development Plan. The application must include a Phased Development Plan if phasing is proposed. The plan must indicate any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase as specified in SDC 5.17.115. Phasing must progress in a sequence that promotes street connectivity between the various phases and accommodates other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The Approval Authority may require the applicant to enter into an agreement for phased developments, and may require bonding or other assurances for improvements, in accordance with SDC 5.15.135, Bonding and Assurances for Development. ❑ Narrative. The application must include a written letter, narrative, or report documenting how the proposal is in compliance with the applicable approval criteria contained in SDC 5.17.125, Site Plan Review Approval Standards. ❑ Deed Restrictions. The application must submit copies of all existing and proposed restrictions or covenants. ❑ Additional Information. The Director may require an applicant to submit additional information at the time of Site Plan Review application submittal. At the applicant's expense, additional studies, reports, or exhibits prepared by qualified professionals may be required to address specific site features or concerns to demonstrate compliance with approval standards. Additional information may include, but is not limited to the following items: ❑ Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved; ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Oregon -licensed engineer, if the required Site Assessment specified in SDC 5.17.120 indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. ❑ Septic Systems. If the properties are not served by the City sewer system in accordance with SDC 4.3.105, the application must include documentation from the Department of Environmental Quality or its agent that indicates that the proposed development will be in compliance with all applicable requirements for sanitary septic systems when such systems exist on the properties affected by the development. 0 IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1.210: The following information may be submitted or may be required to be submitted for the applicant to demonstrate compliance with the applicable approval standards. ❑ Preliminary Title Report. A Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 90 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ❑ Traffic Impact Study. A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. ❑ Multiple Unit Housing Standards. Materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 4.7.380, Multiple Unit Housing Standards (if applicable). ❑ Rillarian Area Protection Report. Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW. ❑ Geotechnical Report. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high-water table, or if required by the City Engineer. ❑ Overlay District. Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives. ❑ Additional Information. Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. ❑ Tree Felling Permit. If five or more qualifying trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19.100. ❑ Wetland Delineation. A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Department of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property. ❑ Federal or State Permits. The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Land and Drainage Alteration Permit (LDAP). Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development in accordance with Springfield Municipal Code 8.418. 10 ❑ Discretionary Use or Variance. Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 must be provided. ❑ Annexation. An Annexation application must be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7.100, where a development is proposed outside of the City limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer. 11 SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS 225 FIFTH STREET 69.. GON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX: 541.726.1021 www. springfield-or. gov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK ----------------------------- -------------------- Area below this line Bled out by Applicant) ----------------------------------- (Please return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield Development and Public Works; Fax # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036), email:cmeeachern@springfield-or.gov Project Name: Applicant: Assessors Parcel #: Date: Land Use(s): Phone #: Project Size (Acres): Fax #: Approx. Impervious Area: Email: Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: -------------------- — (Area below this line filled out b), the Citi, and Returned to the Applicant) — - — — ---- - (At a minimum, all boxes checked by the City on the front and back of this sheet shall be submitted for an a ? . lication to be complete for submittal, although other r uirements may be necessag.) Drainage Study 1yQe EDSPM Section 4.03.2:(Note, UH may be substituted for Rational Method ❑ Small Site Study — (use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: ❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Wetland/Riparian: ❑ Soil Type: Downstream Analysis: ❑ N/A ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: ❑ Hillside Development: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: ❑ Other Jurisdictions Return to Clayton iticEachern @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachern@springfield-or,gov, FAX: (541) 736-1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS For Official Use Only. *Based upon the information provided on the front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is needed for an application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site approval; Additional site specific information may be required. Note: Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completed form has been signed in the space provided below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality f EDSPM Chapter 3 Req'd N/A Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. Fj Ej Where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual. For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (Sec2.4.1). If a stormwater treatment swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual. Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. General Study Requirements EDSPM Section 4.03 Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. 0L7Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year storm event and overflow effects of a 25 -year storm event. The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review of Downstream S stem EDSPM Section 4.03.4.0 A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the j E, Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well. Other/Miscellaneous Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another. Fj Ej Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to the website: http://www.deg.state.or.us/wq/uic/uic.htm for more information. Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events. *This form shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, of the stormwater study. * INIPORTANT. ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOWAN SSIGN. As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015 M ��.�� M'LaAeiiMiu4[tl�iwlt�ifERYX[S a46ASUEV -i-f vFMEto 01(Go"91V7 1511)307.9$30 W WW.MEIRO"AMMMO.COM SITE REVIEW FOR L?:ND BARON HOLDINGS LLC WRITTEN NARRATIVE Submittal no: Document Date: 6/27/2024 Applicants Request: Approval of Site Review for Automotive Shop Property Owner/ Applicant: Land Baron Holdings LLC Bill Childs (member) 1089 28'h Street Springfield, OR 97478 Tamara Lynn Flanders 11372 Pyramid Ct Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Applicant Representative/ Jed Truett, AICP, Principal Planner Project Coordinator: Metro Planning, Inc. 846 A Street Springfield, OR 97477 Subject Property: 1089 28thm Street MTL 17-02-31-22-01300 & 00900 Property Size: .43 acres (18,898 sq ft) Zoning: LMI (Light -Medium Industrial) Background The subject property is located at 1089 28th Street. The site is 18,898 sq ft and is currently zoned LMI (Light -Medium Industrial). The site is currently in use as a vehicle repair shop which per SCD 3.2.420 is an outright permitted use in the LMI zone. The purpose of this Site Review application is to formalize the use with the City of Springfield. The following narrative addresses the subject property's compliance with SDC 5.17.125 — Site Review standards. Springfield Development Code sections are indicated by bolcWtalic text. Applicant responses are indicated by plain text. 5.17.125 Site Plan Review —Approval Standards. (A) The Director must approve, approve with conditions, or deny a proposed Site Plan Review application based on the following standards: (1) The proposed land use is a permitted use or is allowed as a discretionary use in the land use district. Response: The subject property is zoned Light -Medium Industrial (LMI) and currently exists as a vehicle repair shop which is a permitted use in the LMI zone. (2) if a use is allowed as a discretionary use, in addition to meeting the standards below, a Discretionary Use application must be approved in conformance with the standards in SDC 5.9.100. ResDonse: The existing use is not a discretionary use; it is permitted outright. (3) The proposal complies with the standards of the land use district of the subject property; Response: uie-iwsand buiiaings-ar+e-exisung an© nage-.peen (4) The proposal complies with any applicable approved master plan, master facilities plan, refinement plan, and/or special planned district. Resr,onse: the subject property is not within any approved master plan, master facilities plan, refinement plan or special planned district. (5) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.2, Infrastructure Standards -Transportation. 4.2.105 Public Streets (A) General Provisions. (1) All public streets and alleys must be improved as specified in this code and must be dedicated through the approval of a subdivision plat or by acceptance of a deed approved by the City. (2) Functional Classification of Streets. (3) New connections to arterials and State highways must be consistent with any designated access management category. (B) An applicant may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. A TIS is required if any of the following criteria are met Response: the connection to 281h Street is existing and no public streets or alley are within the project site, so this criteria is not applicable. 1 1 P a g e 4.2.120 Site Access and Driveway Standards (A) Site Access and Driveways—General. (1) All developed lots or parcels are entitled to 1 approved driveway access provided by either direct access to a: (a) Public street or alley along the frontage of the property; or (b) Private street that connects to the public street system. The private street must be constructed as specified in SDC 4.2. 110 (private streets are not to be permitted in lieu of public streets shown on the Springfield Transportation System Plan, including the Conceptual Street Map); or (c) Public street by an irrevocable joint use/access easement serving the subject property that has been approved by the City Attomey, where: (i) A private driveway is required in lieu of a panhandle driveway, as specified in SDC 3.2.220(B), or (ii) Combined access for 2 or more lotslparcels is required to reduce the number of driveways along a street, as determined by the Director Resoonse: the subject parcels are served by an existing easement to 281h Street. See attached site plan for details. (2) Single -unit detached dwellings and middle housing with frontage on a local street may have 2 or more driveway accesses from the local street as follows: (a) One driveway access that meets the standards in SDC Tables 4.2.2 through 4.2.5 is permitted per dwelling unit, including accessory dwelling units. These driveway accesses may be combined or consolidated. (b) The lot or parcel may have 1 additional driveway serving an accessory structure, rear yard, or side yard that meets the standards in SDC Tables 4.2.2 through 4.2.5. The total driveway width across an frontage with 2 or more driveways must not exceed 30 feet. (3) For multiple unit housing, commercial land uses, public land uses, and industrial land uses, more than 1 driveway access from a local street to the development area may be permitted through a Type 2 approval process, when the additional driveway access or accesses do not conflict with public street functions and capacity and the design minimizes traffic conflicts. Response only one driveway exists. See attached site plan drawing. (B) Driveways must take access from lower classification streets when development sites abut more than 1 street and streets are of differing classification as identified in the Springfield Transportation System Plan except as allowed under this subsection. (1) Driveway access to or from a higher classification street may be permitted through a Type 2 approval process if no reasonable alternative street access exists or where heavy use of local streets is inappropriate due to traffic impacts in residential areas, as follows: (a) Where a proposed development abuts an existing or proposed arterial or collector street, the development design and off-street improvements must minimize the traffic conflicts. 2 1 P a g e (c) Additional improvements or design modifications necessary to resolve identified transportation conflicts may be required on a case-by-case basis. Response: the project abuts only one street and is served by an existing easement. See attached site plan for details. (2) For single dwelling units, duplexes, and middle housing, no more than 1 driveway per lot or parcel is permitted along the frontage that abuts an existing orproposed anterial or collector street. Where more than 1 dwelling unit takes access from the existing or proposed arterial or collector street, driveways may be combined or consolidated consistent with the standards in SDC Tables 4.2.2 through 4.2.5. (C) Driveways must be designed to allow safe and efficient vehicular ingress and egress as specified in SDC Tables 4.2.2 through 4.2.5, the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, and the Development & Public Works Standard Construction Specifications, (1) Existing driveways may be expanded up to the maximum dimensions permitted in SDC Tables 4.2.2 through 4.2.5 through a Type 1 approval process, provided that the driveway expansion does not require removal or relocation of any existing street trees, street lighting, or underground or above ground utilities and provided that the applicant obtains any applicable permit required to construct improvements in the public right-of-way. (2) Driveway widths and throat depths may be varied outside of the standards in Tables 4.2.2 through 4.2.5 through a Type 2 approval process if no other reasonable altemative exists to accommodate on-site development needs, if traffic safety is not impacted, and if the variance does not conflict with frontage improvements such as street trees, street lighting, and utility pedestals. (3) Off-street vehicle parking is restricted to approved driveways and parking lots, and is not otherwise allowed between the street and primary building, consistent with Springfield Municipal Code Section 5.002(11). Response: Driveway and associated dimensions and parking are proposed as shown on the existing scaled site plan. !.130 Vision Clearance Area. (A) ... (C) Resp onse: sufficient vision clearance area is provided at 281h Street. See attached site plan for details. 4.2.135 Sidewalks. (A) Sidewalks and planter strips abutting public streets must be located wholly within the public street right-of-way. Altematively, the applicant may propose a design that does not meet this standard, subject to Director approval through a Type 2 approval process. in approving an altemative, the Director may require altemative setbacks or driveway paving requirements that reflect the altered position and location of the sidewalk. (B) Sidewalks must be designed, constructed, replaced, or repaired as specified in the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, the Development & Public Works Standard Construction Specifications, and the Springfield Municipal Code. (C) Concrete sidewalks must be provided according to SDC 4.2.105(C), Table 4.2.1, and the following criteria: (1) Sidewalks must conform to the existing or planned street grades. (2) Sidewalks must conform to current ADA standards. (3) Sidewalks must be separated from the curb by the planting strip. Alternatively, sidewalks may be proposed to not meet this standard when necessary for connectivity, safety, or to comply with street design requirements subject to approval by the Director. (4) New sidewalk width and type must be consistent with existing sidewalk design in the same block, but must physically transition to comply with current sidewalk standards. When replacing damaged sidewalk, new sidewalk must be located in the same position as the existing sidewalk. 3 1 P a g e (5) Facilities including, but not limited to, mail boxes, water meters, valves, junction boxes, manholes, utility poles, trees, benches, fire hydrants, signs, and bus stops must not be located within the sidewalk, and must be removed or relocated prior to the construction or reconstruction of the sidewalk. Altematively, the City Engineer may approve an alternative design to this standard if at least 5 feet of unobstructed width on arterial class streets and 4 feet on all other streets will remain around the facility. (D) Planter strips are required as pari of sidewalk construction. (...J (E) Maintenance of sidewalks is the continuing obligation of the abutting property owner Response: existing sidewalks are shown along 28t' Street on the attached site plan. The Applicant would request the Planning Director approve the sidewalks as they exist. 4.2.145 Lighting Standards. Lighting design and placement for streets, paths, and accessways must conform to the following design standards and the Development & Public Works Standard Construction Specifications. This section does not apply to on-site lighting standards that are regulated by Section 4.5.100. (A) Lighting must be included with all new developments or redevelopment. Existing lighting must be upgraded to current standards with all new developments or redevelopment. The developer is responsible for lighting material and installation costs. (B) Design Standards. Res:)onse: Street lights are existing and shown on the attached site plan. (6) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.3, infrastructure Standards -Utilities. 4.3.105 Sanitary Sewer. (A) All sanitary sewer design including supporting documentation must be prepared and stamped by an Oregon licensed engineer. (B) Sanitary sewers must be installed to serve each new development within the city limits and to connect developments to existing sanitary sewer mains. (C) The sanitary sewer must be designed and constructed in conformance with Chapter 2 of the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). (D) The City Engineermust approve all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to development approval for an application proposing or requiring new sanitary sewer construction. (E) For proposed developments in unincorporated urbanizable land, the Lane County Sanitarian must approve all septic system designs. (F) The sanitary sewer system must be separated from any stormwater sewer system. Response: sanitary sewer is existing to both buildings in this project. Locations and sizing are shown on the attached site plan drawing. 4.3. 110 Stormwater Management. (A) Definitions. (1) ... (2) (B) Applicability. The following development activities require the use of a site-specific stormwater management approach that incorporates 1 or more structural stormwater controls: (1) Development that creates or replaces 5, 000 square feet or more of impervious surface area, (2) Development that disturbs 1 or more acres of land within the development area, and (3) Development that generates peak flows in excess of 0.5 cubic feet per second within the development area. (C) Stormwater Structural Controls - General Standards. (1) Engineered Design Requirement. The Stormwater Study required under section 4.3.110(E) and supporting documentation for the design of the proposed stormwater structural controls must be prepared and stamped by an Oregon licensed engineer. (2) Technical Standards, The Stormwater Study required under section 4.3.110(E) must demonstrate compliance with one of the following performance standards: 4 1 P a g e (a) Site Performance Standard., The first 1.4 inches of rainfall from each storm event must be routed to 1 or more structural stormwater controls with sufficient capacity to fully infiltrate, evapotranspirate, and/or be reused on site without stormwater runoff discharging from the site, or (b) Treatment Standard: All rainfall not retained onsite, up to the first 1.4 inches of rainfall from each storm event, must be treated in compliance with the standards and design criteria in SDC 4.3.110(D). (3) Discharge to Sanitary Sewer Prohibited. The stormwater management system must be separated from, and not discharge to, any public or private sanitary sewer system. (4) Facility Design Standards. The structural stormwater controls must be designed, operated, and maintained consistent with the requirements in the facility -specific design requirements provided in Appendix D Typical Facility Details. Unless an alternative is approved under the Treatment Standard, stormwater controls that include vegetative treatment must incorporate only those plant species listed in Appendix F. (5) Construction Standards. All stormwater structural controls must be constructed consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual Chapter 4. (6) Permeable Pavements. Permeable pavements may be used to reduce the area of impervious surfaces and shall be constructed consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Permeable pavements cannot be used for treatment of stormwater from other impervious areas. (7) Injection Wells, Except where prohibited by this code, underground injection wells are allowed only with approval from the Department of Environmental Quality. (8) On -Site Source Controls for High Risk Land Uses. Where an application proposes one of the following high-risk uses, the application must comply with additional standards as provided in Appendix H On -Site Source Controls: (a) Site Uses and Characteristics That Trigger Source Controls. (b) Fuel Dispensing Facilities. (c) Aboveground Storage of Liquid Materials. (d) Solid Waste Storage Areas, Containers, and Trash Compactors. (e) Outdoor Storage of Bulk Materials. (t) Material Transfer -Areas. (g) Equipment andfor Vehicle Washing Facilities. (h) Covered Vehicle Parking Structures. (9) Roof -Mounted Equipment. All rooftop mounted equipment shall be provided with secondary containment or a weather resistant enclosure to ensure that, in the event of a leak or spill, any fluids cannot migrate into a public or private stormwater system or to any underground injection control facilities. (D) Treatment Standard - Criteria. The following provisions apply to review of an application that proposes to meet the Treatment Standard under SDC 4.3. 1 10(C)(2)(a) above. (1) ... (3) (E) Stormwater Study Standards. (1) An applicant must complete a Stormwater Study for any development requiring the installation of structural stormwater controls as specified in SDC 4.3.110(B). (2) A Stormwater Study must include the following: (a) .. (b) (i) ... (xii) (F) Stormwater Study Types. (1) ... (2) (G) Stormwater Study Hydrologic Calculation Standards. The Stormwater Study required under SDC 4.3.110(F) must be supported by hydrologic calculations that conform to the following standards: (1) A small site Stormwater Study.. (a) ... (c) (2) A Full Site Stormwater Study ... (a) ...(c) (H) Operations and Maintenance Requirements. 5 1 P a g (1) All structural stormwater controls must be operated and maintained to continue to meet the Site Performance Standard or alternative Treatment Standard as applicable. (2) The owner of properly subject to any application that proposes structural stormwater controls that will be privately -owned and operated must enter into an Operations and Maintenance Agreement with the City. The Agreement must specify at least the following, (a) A plan to maintain and operate the structural stormwater controls to continue to meet the Site Performance Standard or alternative Treatment Standard, which may include but is not limited to operations and maintenance requirements in Appendix E. (b) For structural stormwater controls that include vegetation, requirements to maintain and/or replace vegetation to ensure at least 90 percent vegetative coverage; and; (c) For structural stormwater controls that include soils in the treatment process, requirements to maintain soil permeability and plant health; and (d) Reporting requirements to document compliance with ongoing operations and maintenance requirements. (3) For any property that is subject to an Operations and Maintenance Agreement, a Notice of Operations and Maintenance Agreement (NOMA) must be recorded with Lane County Deeds and Records. The NOMA must be in a form approved by the City, be signed by the property owner and properly notarized, and include a legal description of the subject property. Response: all stormwater systems are existing and no additional impervious surfaces are proposed. See attached site plan for location of stormwater features. 4.3.115 Water Duality Protection. (A) Applicability. These regulations apply water quality protection to only those sites that require Minimum Development Standards Review as specified in SDC 5.15.100, Site Plan Review approval as specified in SDC 5.17.100, and Land Divisions (Partition Tentative Plan and Subdivision Tentative Plan) approval as specified in SDC 5.12.100, or that disturb more than 1 acre of land through a Type 1 review. The following standards do not apply to single unit dwellings duplexes, or middle housing in the R-1 District that disturb less than 1 acre of land, unless as specified in SDC 4.3.115(6)(1). Existing buildings that are within the riparian areas specified in SDC 4.3.115(B)(1) and (2) are not considered non- conforming. SDC 4.3-115(B)(2)(a) and (b) provide additional protection from a non -conforming status. (B) Identification of Water Quality Limited Watercourses. (...) (1) ... (3) (C) Protection of Riparian Area Functions. (...) (1) ..... (2) ..... (3) ........ (D) Riparian Area Boundaries. (...) (1) ... (3) (E) Permitted Uses in Riparian Areas. The following uses are permitted in riparian areas as long as they do not diminish riparian functions: (1) ... (11) Rees ,onse: the nearest water feature is 100' to the east of the site (see attached site plan drawing). A Drinking Water Overlay application has been submitted to Amy Chinitz at SUB for preliminary review. Once her review is done we will submit to the City. 4.3.117 Natural Resource Protection Areas. (A) The purpose of this subsection is to protect identified natural resources in order to: (1) Implement the goals and policies of the Metro Plan; (2) Satisfy the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 5,- (3) ;(3) Safeguard the City's locally significant wetland and riparian areas, especially the hydrologic and ecologic functions these areas provide for the community; (4) Safeguard fish and wildlife habitat; 6 1 P a g e (5) Safeguard water quality and natural hydrology, to control erosion and sedimentation, and to reduce the adverse effects of flooding; (6) Safeguard the amenity values and educational opportunities for City's wetlands and riparian areas for the community; and (7) Improve and promote coordination among Federal, State, and local agencies regarding development activities near wetlands and riparian areas. (8) This subsection must apply to natural resource protection areas that include land within the wetland and/or the riparian resource boundary and the development setback area, specifically., (1) Locally significant protected wetlands, listed in the Springfield Local Wetland inventory and shown on the Local Wetland inventory Map. (a) ... (c) (2) Locally significant protected riparian areas....... (3) The protections described in this subsection do not apply to: (a) ... (c) (4) Inventory Map Corrections .............. (C) Development Setbacks for Locally Significant Wettand and Riparian Areas. (D) Site Plan Review as specified in SDC 5,17. 100 is required for development in commercial, industrial, R-2, and R-3 land use districts where the multiple unit housing development is proposed within 150 -feet of a locally significant wetland or riparian area. Site Plan Review is not required for: (1) Single unit detached dwellings and middle housing in the R-1 land use district However, the natural resource protection standards of this subsection apply to these single -unit detached dwellings and middle housing; and/or (2) Land divisions that comply with water quality protection standards specified in SDC 4.3.115. (E) Permitted Uses Within Locally Significant Wetland and Riparian Natural Resource Protection Areas. (1) The following uses and activities are permitted within a locally significant wetland or riparian natural resource protection area, including the development setback area, with no additional State or Federal permits: ...................... (2) The following uses and activities are permitted within a locally significant wetland or riparian natural resource protection area, including the development setback area, provided that any applicable Federal, State, or local permits are secured: ........ ....... Response: the nearest water feature is 100' to the east of the site (see attached site plan drawing). A Drinking Water Overlay application has been submitted to Amy Chinitz at SUB for preliminary review. Once her review is done we will submit to the City. 4.3.120 Utility Provider Coordination 4.3.125 Underground Placement of Utilities 4.3.127 Electrical Service 4.3.130 Water Service and Fire Protection 4.3.135 Major Electrical Power Transmission Lines 7 1 P a g e Response: all utilities are already to the site and connected to the existing buildings. Utilities are shown on the attached site plan drawings 4.3.140 Public Easements (A) Utility Easements. The applicant must make arrangements with the City and each utility provider for the dedication of utility easements necessary to fully service the development or land beyond the development area, as necessary. Public utility easements must be shown on plat or in a form approved by the City Attorney, and must meet the following standards: (1) The minimum width for public utility easements adjacent to collector and arterial streets is 10 feet. (2) The minimum width for sewer easements is 5 feet on either side of sewer line for sewers less than 12 inches diameter and less than 5 feet of cover, and 7 feet on either side of the sewer line for sewers greater than 12 inches diameter or with greater than 5 feet of cover. (3) The minimum width for all other public utility easements is 7 feet (4) Notwithstanding the above standards, the utility provider or the Director may require a larger easement for major water mains, major electric power transmission lines, stormwater management systems or in any other situation to allow maintenance vehicles to set up and perform the required maintenance or to accommodate multiple utility lines. (5) Where feasible, utility easements must be centered on a lot/parcel line. (B) Watercourse or Riparian Area Maintenance Easements Response: public utilities are adjacent to the site in the 28th Street right of way. No internal public utility easements are needed or proposed. (7) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.4, Landscaping, Screening, and Fence Standards. 4.4.105 Landscaping 4.4.110 Screening 4.4.115 Fences Response: internal buildings and fencing are pre-existing and there isn't sufficient room for landscaping. Screening can be provided by chain link fencing and slats with adjacent residential properties to the east that are also located on Industrial zoned land, as needed. (8) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.5, On -Site Lighting Standards. 4.5.105 Purpose and Applicability (A) On-site lighting standards are established to create a safe and secure environment during hours of darkness and reduce orprevent light pollution by minimizing glare. (B) Light fixtures subject to the standards in this section are outdoor artificial illuminating devices, outdoor fixtures, lamps, and other similar devices, permanently installed or portable, used for flood lighting, general illumination, or advertisement. Such devices include, but are not limited to, lights for (1) Buildings and Structures (2) Recreational areas; (3) Parking lot and maneuvering areas; (4) Landscape areas; (5) Streets and street signs; (6) Product display areas; (7) Building overhangs and open canopies; (8) Holiday celebrations; (9) Construction lights. 4.5.110 Lighting Standards. 81P age (A) Standards for Installation and Operation of Outdoor Lighting. Except as exempt by subsection (C) of SDC 4.5.105 above, new outdoor lighting fixtures installed after July 1, 2022, are subject to the standards below. No provision of this section is intended to preempt Springfield Municipal Code 8.200 et seq., Signs, or applicable State codes. (1) ... (9) (B) On-site lighting must be the minimum illumination necessary for compliance....... (C) Height Res_ onset lighting is provided at the street via street lights and on buildings. No new lighting is proposed. (9) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.6, Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading, and Bicycle Parking Standards. 4.6.105 Vehicle Parking—Purpose and Applicability (A) Off-street motor vehicle parking lots or spaces are not required, however if provided must meet minimum standards of the Springfield Development Code. These regulations provide standards for the development of vehicle parking. (B) Unless exempted elsewhere in this code, all development within the City and its urbanizable area must comply with the vehicle parking provisions of this section. 4.6.115 Motor Vehicle Parking—Parking Lot Design. All off-street parking areas shall comply with the following dimensional standards: 4.6.120 Motor Vehicle Parkini—Parking Lot Improvements. All parking areas must conform to the setback, vision clearance, planting, and screening provisions of this code and must be completed prior to occupancy. Required parking spaces must be improved as follows: (A) ... (G) 4.6.125 Motor Vehicle Parkin – Parking Space Requirements (A) ... (D) 4.6.130 Loading Areas – Purpose and Applicabilitv 4.6.135 Loading Areas – Facility Desi n and Improvements 4.6.140 Bicycle Parkin – Purpose and Applicability 4.6.145 Bicycle Parkin – Facility Desi n 4.6.150 Bicycle Parking – Facility Improvements 4.6.155 Bicycle Parking-- Number of Spaces Reguired Re_sYonse. the attached site plan shows proposed parking as per SDC. Bicycle parking will be located in a secure location inside the northerly building. (10) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.7, Specific Development Standards. 4.7.115 Auto, Manufactured Dwelling, RV. Boat,_ Motorcycle and Truck Sales, Service and Rentals. (C) All activities associated with motor vehicle repair and service, with the exception of maintenance activities including the pumping gas or changing tires, shall take place within a building constructed to ensure that noise or odors do not disturb the normal operation or tranquility of neighboring residential, commercial, campus Industrial or public land uses. Storage of motor vehicles to be repaired shall be screened by a sight -obscuring 9 1 P a g e fence. Service stations in the NC District shall be limited to 2 pumps. A 5 -foot wide landscape strip shall be installed along the street frontage of all service stations. Resconse; all activities associated with vehicle repair will take place inside of the existing shop building to minimize noise and odors. 10lPage After recordinR return to: Order Number: 40998 Western Title&Escrow 497 Oakway Road, Suite 340 1 Eugene, OR 97401 - Land Baron Holdings, LCC Attn: Bill Childs 91040 Hill Road Springfield, OR 97478 ,•wUntil asehadge hf iequested, all tax statements shall be sent to the followin _address::� Same as Above ' /Divlsion of Chief Deputy Clerk 1010.0660 Lane County Deeds and Reeerds $47.00 01195030201000646500020021 12/21/2010 01:27:15 PM RPR—DEED Cntel Stno6 CASHIER 04 $10.00 $11.00 $16.00 $10.00 Reserved for Recorder's Use STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Fred J. Baker Grantor(s) convey and warrant to Land Baron Holdings, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Grantee the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein: Beginning at a point, which said point is South 890 44' East 140 feet of a point in the middle of County Road No. 221, known as Emery Lane, 3438.56 feet North 00 05' East from the Southwest corner of The J.C. Carter Donation Land Claim No. 58, in Section 31, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian; thence South 890 44' East 70 feet; thence South 00 05' West 76.115 feet; thence North 890 44' West 70 feet; thence North 00 05' East 76.115 feet to the point of beginning, all in Lane County, Oregon. Account No(s): 0119295 Map/Tax Lot No(s): 17 02 31 22 01300 This property is free of encumbrances, EXCEPT: All those items of record, if any, as of the date of this deed, including any real property taxes due, but not yet payable. The true consideration for this conveyance is $135,000.00. (Here comply with requirements of ORS 93.030.) BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER QRS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009. Executed this -21 day of December, 2010 Z a �Aaz Fred Y. Ba r State of Oregon, Cou of Lane ) ss. This instrument wa ac4Cnowledged before me on thl L day of December, 2010 by Fred J. Baker �7 / NoL�af Public foF-yregon My commission expires: FWOF FIC W. SEAL C SENN NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON COINAl1SSION NO 417965 W COMMISSION EXPIRE5 JUNE 1S 2011 PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED OF DISTRIBUTION After Recording Return to: William C. Atwood Attorney at Law 500 Main Street, Suite B P.O. Box 1478 Springfield, OR 97477 Lane County Clerk 222_425545 Lane County Deeds and Records 111111111! I I!I f I l 11 11 11 l l f l l!I I III I III I IIII ! I l lil $92.00 02025583202200255450020023 06/09/2022 01:07:46 PM RPR -DEED Cnt=1 Pgs=2 Stn=9 CASHIER 30 $10.00 $11.00 $61.00 $10.00 Tamara Lynn Flanders, Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Lambert Boone, Sr., in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Lane County, Case No. 21 PB02509, GRANTOR, conveys to Tamara Lynn Flanders and Thomas Lambert Boone, Jr., as tenants in common, GRANTEES, all of the estate, right and interest of the said deceased at the time of the decedent's death, and all the right, title and interest that the said estate of said deceased by operation of law or otherwise may have thereafter acquired in that certain real property situated in the County of Lane, State of Oregon, described as follows: See attached Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK 1MTH-THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. The true consideration for this conveyance is other than monetary. Until a change is requested, all tax statements shall be sent to the following address: Tamara Lynn Flanders, 11372 Pyramid Court, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737, 4k 2022. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GRANTOR executed this instrument this I ? day of May, Tamara Lynn Flanders Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Lambert Boone, Sr. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of� ) ss. Personally appeared the above named Tamara Lynn Flanders, Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Lambert Boone, Sr., and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be her voluntary act and deed this V, day of May, 2022. lamyTHOMAS P. MLLLENNotary Public - CaliforniaSan Bernardino CountyNotary Public for alifornia Commission ; 2384525 Comm. Expires Dec 20. 2025 EXHIBIT A Beginning at a point in the middle of County Road No. 221, known as Emery Lane, 3528.56 feet North 00 05' East from the Southwest corner of the J. C. Carter Donation Land.Claim No. 58, in Section 31, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, from said beginning point run South 89° 44' East 176 feet; thence South 00 05' East 90 feet; thence North 890 44' West 176 feet to the middle of the said Emery Lane; thence North along the middle of said road 90 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, in said Section 31, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, in Lane County, Oregon. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the West 25 feet thereof, deeded to the City of Springfield for road purposes by deed recorded January 7, 1975, Reception No. 75-00679, Official Records of Lane County, Oregon. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion conveyed to the City of Springfield for road purposes, by deed recorded May 5, 1976, Reception No. 76-21389, Official Records of Lane County, Oregon.