Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication Applicant 6/6/2024Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 14 City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities - Minimum Development Standards - Type 1 Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Applicant Name: Phone: Company: E-mail: Address: Applicant’s Rep.: Phone: Company: E-mail: Address: Property Owner: Phone: Company: E-mail: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: TAX LOT NO(S): Property Address: Nearest Intersection : ROW Private Property Description of Proposal: If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Existing Use: Signatures: Please sign and print your name and date in the appropriate box on the next page. Required Property Information (City Intake Staff: complete this section) Associated Permits : Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Postage Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Madison Tomaino AT&T Mobility 19801 SW 72nd Avenue, Suite 110, Tualatin, OR 97062 (503) 367-1484 ml738x@att.com Don Forsberg (503) 267-1947 Centerline Communications dforsberg@clinellc.com 8117 SE Vermont Street, Hillsboro, OR 97123 17032541 102 2656 Olympic Street N 28th Street X Upgrade existing wireless communications facility Storage facility Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 14 Signatures The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate. Applicant: Date: Signature Print If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. Owner: Date: Signature Print I certify that I prepared the attached plot plan and that it contains the information specified in the submittal requirements checklist. I certify that the plot plan is accurate based upon field locates and the best available information. I understand that City staff will rely upon the plot plan in making any decisions regarding the Minimum Development Standards application. I accept full responsibility and liability in the event that there are any omissions, mistakes, or inaccuracies in the plot plan. Plot Plan Preparation: Date: Plot Plan Preparer Signature Print • Please See Attachment A to this application for general standards applicable to all Type 1 Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Review, and Attachment B for standards specifically related to small wireless facilities located within the public right of way. Don Forsberg Don Forsberg 5/6/2024 5/30/2024 Nick Schauer Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities on Private Property and Public Rights of Way Application and Review Process 1. Applicant Submits a Complete Application to the Development & Public Works Department • The application must conform to the Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 5- 7 of this application packet. • Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine whether all required items listed have been submitted. • Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal. 2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check • Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 7 days of submittal. • The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of the application. • An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and statutes have been provided. • Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application acceptance and initiation of review timelines. 3. City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • This is a Type I decision and thus is made without public notice and without a public hearing since there are clear and objective approval criteria and/or development standards that do not require the use of discretion. • Decisions address all the applicable approval criteria and/or development standards. • Applications may be approved or approved with conditions. • The City mails the applicant and owner a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City and may not be appealed. SDC 4.3-145 H. Review Process. The review process is determined by the type of WTS facility or activity that is proposed. High or moderate visibility WTS facilities, defined in Subsection E., require Type III Planning Commission or Hearings Official review. Low visibility or stealth facilities, and the co-location of new equipment of existing facilities are allowed under a Type I staff review with applicable building or electrical permits. Routine equipment repair and maintenance do not require planning review; however, applicable building and electrical permits are required. 1. Development Issues Meeting. A Development Issues Meeting (DIM) as specified in Subsection 5.1-120A. is required only for high and moderate visibility WTS facility applications. Applicable development standards as specified in Subsection F. and submittal requirements as specified in Subsection G., will be discussed at the DIM. Revised 5/21/13 KL 4 of 14 2. Type I Review Process. The following WTS facilities are allowed with the approval of the Director with applicable building and electrical permits: a. Stealth and low visibility WTS facilities, as defined in Subsection E., in any zoning district. b. Façade-mounted antennas or low powered networked telecommunications facilities, e.g., as those employing microcell antennas integrated into the architecture of an existing building in a manner that no change to the architecture is apparent and no part of the WTS facility is visible to public view. c. Antennas or arrays that are hidden from public view through the use of architectural treatments, e.g., within a cupola, steeple, or parapet which is consistent with the applicable building height limitation. d. New antennas or arrays including side-mounted antennas and small top- mounted antennas that are attached to an existing broadcast communication facility located in any zone. No more than 3 small top-mounted antennas shall be placed on the top of any one facility without a Type III review. e. To minimize adverse visual impacts associated with the proliferation and clustering of towers, co-location of antennas or arrays on existing towers shall take precedence over the construction of new towers, provided the co-location is accomplished in a manner consistent with the following: i. An existing tower may be modified or rebuilt to a taller height to accommodate the co-location of additional antennas or arrays, as long as the modified or rebuilt tower will not exceed the height limit of the applicable zoning district. Proposals to increase the height of a tower in a residential zoning district, or within 500 feet of a residential zoning district shall be reviewed under a Type III process. The height change may only occur one time per tower. ii. An existing tower that is modified or reconstructed to accommodate the co-location of additional antennas or arrays shall be of the same tower type and reconstructed in the exact same location as the existing tower. f. Small wireless facilities proposed within the public right-of-way on an existing, modified, new, or replacement small wireless facility structure in any zoning district in City limits, that meet the standards in section 4.3-145.F.28. g. Co-location of antennas or arrays on existing WTS facilities. h. The Director will use the applicable criteria specified in Subsection I. to evaluate the proposal. Revised 5/21/13 KL 5 of 14 Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Submittal Checklist For more information regarding wireless telecommunications facilities, definitions or the use of this application form please refer to Section 4.3-145 of the Springfield Development Code or call the Planner on Duty at 541-726-3753. General Application Packet Elements Application Fee – refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available on line and at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of submittal. Complete Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Facilities Application Form Copy of the Deed, City Right of Way Use/Pole Attachment Agreement and/or Express Written Consent from Owner of Facilities or Property State or County Approvals Required – The applicant must demonstrate that any application has been approved for any required state or county permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. Narrative addressing submittal requirements and development standards of SDC 4.3-145. See Attachment A to this application. Four (4) Complete Packets with the documents, plans and information as detailed below. Application Submittal Requirements. SDC 4.3-145 G. Application Submittal Requirements. All applications for a WTS facility shall provide the following reports, documents or documentation: 1. Submittal Requirements for Low Visibility and Stealth Facilities (Type I review). All applications for low visibility and stealth WTS facilities shall submit the following reports and documentation: a. Narrative. The application shall include a written narrative that describes in detail all of the equipment and components proposed to be part of the WTS facility, including, but not limited to, towers, antennas and arrays, equipment cabinets, back-up generators, air conditioning units, lighting, landscaping and fencing. b. Geographic Service Area. Except for small wireless facilities, the applicant shall identify the geographic service area for the proposed WTS facility, including a map showing all of the applicant’s and any other existing sites in the local service network associated with the gap the facility is meant to close. The applicant shall describe how this service area fits into and is necessary for the service provider’s service network. Revised 5/21/13 KL 6 of 14 The service area map for the proposed WTS facility shall include the following: i. The area of significant gap in the existing coverage area; ii. The service area to be effected by the proposed WTS facility; iii. The locations of existing WTS tower facilities where co-location is possible within a 5-mile radius of the proposed WTS facility. c. Co-Location. An engineer’s analysis/report of the recommended site location area is required for a proposed WTS tower. For small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way, this report is required only when a new structure is proposed. If an existing structure approved for co-location is within the area recommended by the engineer’s report, reasons for not collocating shall be provided demonstrating at least one of the following deficiencies, except for small wireless facilities which must meet the requirements in subsection 4.3-145.F.28.k of this Code, upon report of an engineer or other qualified individual: i. The structure is not of sufficient height to meet engineering requirements; ii. The structure is not of sufficient structural strength to accommodate the WTS facility, or there is a lack of space on all suitable existing towers to locate proposed antennas; iii. Electromagnetic interference for one or both WTS facilities will result from co-location; or iv. The radio frequency coverage objective cannot be adequately met. d. Plot Plan. A plot plan showing: the lease area, setbacks from adjacent public and private properties lines, antenna structure and equipment shelter with height above grade, connection point with the land line system, landscaping, screening and means of access. e. RF Emissions. An engineer’s statement that the RF emissions at grade, or at nearest habitable space when attached to an existing structure, complies with FCC rules for these emissions; the cumulative RF emissions if co-located. Provide the RF range in megahertz and the wattage output of the equipment. f. Description of Service. A description of the type of service offered including, but not limited to: voice, data, video and the consumer receiving equipment. g. Provider Information. Identification of the provider and backhaul provider, if different. Revised 5/21/13 KL 7 of 14 h. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation. Provide the zoning and applicable comprehensive plan (e.g., Metro Plan, 2030 Springfield Refinement Plan) designation of the proposed site and the surrounding properties within 500 feet. i. FCC, FAA or Other Required Licenses and Determinations. Provide a copy of all pertinent submittals to the FCC, FAA or other State or Federal agencies including environmental assessments and impact statements, and data, assumptions, calculations, and measurements relating to RF emissions safety standards. j. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way. Applications for small wireless facilities in City limits in the public right-of-way must also include: i. A structural report stamped by an Oregon licensed engineer that the small wireless facility structure can structurally accommodate the proposed small wireless facility; For attachment to existing structures, the engineer who authors and stamps the report must have conducted an in-person inspection of the pole and any issues with the condition of the pole must be noted in the report; ii. A photo simulation showing the maximum silhouette, color and finish of the proposed facility; iii. For poles that are not owned by the City of Springfield, written authorization by the pole owner regarding the specific plan to attach to the pole; and iv. All necessary permits and applications required under the Springfield Municipal Code, which may be processed concurrently. Revised 5/21/13 KL 8 of 14 ATTACHMENT A General Information - Low Visibility, Stealth and Small Wireless Telecommunication Facilities (MDS Type 1) Standards for Review SDC 4.3-145 F. General Standards. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 establishes limitations on the siting standards that local governments can place on WTS facilities. Section 704 of the Act states that local siting standards shall not: 1) “unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services” 2) “prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services.” All applications for WTS facilities are subject to the standards in this Section to the extent that they do not violate Federal limitations on local siting standards. Where application of the standards found in this Section constitutes a violation, the least intrusive alternative for providing coverage shall be allowed as an exception to the standards. 1. Design for Co-Location. All new towers shall be designed to structurally accommodate the maximum number of additional users technically practicable. 2. Demonstrated Need for New WTS Facilities. Except for small wireless facilities, applications shall demonstrate that the proposed WTS facility is necessary to close a significant gap in service coverage or capacity for the carrier and is the least intrusive means to close the significant gap. 3. Lack of Coverage and Lack of Capacity. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate that the gap in service cannot be closed by upgrading other existing facilities. In doing so, evidence shall clearly support a conclusion that the gap results from a lack of coverage and not a lack of capacity to achieve adequate service. If the proposed WTS facility is to improve capacity, evidence shall further justify why other methods for improving service capacity are not reasonable, available or effective. 4. Identify the Least Intrusive Alternative for Providing Coverage. Except for small wireless facilities, the application shall demonstrate a good faith effort to identify and evaluate less intrusive alternatives, including, but not limited to, less sensitive sites, alternative design systems, alternative tower designs, the use of repeaters, or multiple facilities. Subsection F.5. defines the type of WTS facilities that are allowed in each zoning district. 5. Location of WTS Facilities by Type. Subsection E. defines various types of WTS facilities by their visual impact. These are: high visibility, moderate visibility, low visibility and stealth facilities. Table 4.3-1 lists the type of WTS facilities allowed in each of Springfield’s zoning districts. Revised 5/21/13 KL 9 of 14 Table 4.3-1 Zoning Districts Types Allowed Special Heavy Industrial High visibility Heavy Industrial Moderate visibility Light-Medium Industrial Low visibility Quarry Mining Operations Stealth Community Commercial Moderate visibility Campus Industrial Low visibility Booth Kelly Mixed Use Stealth Major Retail Commercial Mixed Use Employment Mixed Use Commercial Medical Service Public Land and Open Space (1) Neighborhood Commercial Low visibility General Office Stealth Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential Mixed Use Residential (1) Moderate visibility WTS facilities in the Public Land and Open Space District are allowed only within the city limits. 6. Maximum Number of High Visibility WTS Facilities. No more than 1 high visibility facility is allowed on any 1 lot/parcel. EXCEPTION: The Approval Authority may approve exceeding the maximum number of high visibility facilities per lot/parcel if one of the following findings is made: a. Co-location of additional high visibility facilities is consistent with neighborhood character; b. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would have the effect of prohibiting service because the proposed facility would fill a significant gap in coverage and no alternative locations are available and technologically feasible; or c. The provider has shown that denial of an application for additional high visibility WTS facilities would unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services. 7. Separation between Towers. No new WTS tower may be installed closer than 2,000 feet from any existing or proposed tower unless supporting findings can be made under Subsections F.2., 3. and 4. by the Approval Authority. Revised 5/21/13 KL 10 of 14 8. WTS Towers Adjacent to Residentially Zoned Property. In order to ensure public safety, all towers located on or adjacent to any residential zoning district shall be set back from all residential property lines by a distance at least equal to the height of the facility, including any antennas or other appurtenances. The setback shall be measured from that part of the WTS tower that is closest to the neighboring residentially zoned property. 9. Historic Buildings and Structures. Except for small wireless facilities, no WTS facility shall be allowed on any building or structure, or in any district, that is listed on any Federal, State or local historic register unless a finding is made by the Approval Authority that the proposed facility will have no adverse effect on the appearance of the building, structure, or district. No change in architecture and no high or moderate visibility WTS facilities are permitted on any building or any site within a historic district. Proposed WTS facilities in the Historic Overlay District are also subject to the applicable provisions of Section 3.3-900. 10. Equipment Location. The following location standards shall apply to WTS facilities, except for small wireless facilities: a. No WTS facility shall be located in a front, rear, or side yard building setback in any base zone and no portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines; b. Where there is no building, the WTS facility shall be located at least 30 feet from a property line abutting a street; c. For guyed WTS towers, all guy anchors shall be located at least 50 feet from all property lines. 11. Tower Height. Towers may exceed the height limits otherwise provided for in this Code. However, all towers greater than the height limit of the base zone shall require Discretionary Use approval through a Type III review process, subject to the approval criteria specified in Subsection I. 12. Accessory Building Size. All accessory buildings and structures built to contain equipment accessory to a WTS facility shall not exceed 12 feet in height unless a greater height is necessary and required by a condition of approval to maximize architectural integration. Each accessory building or structure located on any residential or public land and open space zoned property is limited to 200 square feet, unless approved through the Discretionary Use process. 13. Visual Impact. Except for small wireless facilities, which must meet the requirements of section 4.3-145.F.28, all WTS facilities shall be designed to minimize the visual impact to the greatest extent practicable by means of placement, screening, landscaping, and camouflage. All facilities shall also be designed to be compatible with existing architectural elements, building materials, and other site characteristics. The applicant shall use the least visible antennas reasonably available to accomplish the coverage objectives. All high visibility and moderate visibility facilities shall be sited in a manner to cause the least detriment to the viewshed of abutting properties, neighboring properties, and distant properties. Revised 5/21/13 KL 11 of 14 14. Minimize Visibility. Colors and materials for WTS facilities shall be nonreflective and chosen to minimize visibility. Facilities, including support equipment and buildings, shall be painted or textured using colors to match or blend with the primary background, unless required by any other applicable law. 15. Camouflaged Facilities. All camouflaged WTS facilities shall be designed to visually and operationally blend into the surrounding area in a manner consistent with existing development on adjacent properties. The facility shall also be appropriate for the specific site. In other words, it shall not “stand out” from its surrounding environment. 16. Façade-Mounted Antenna. Façade-mounted antennas shall be architecturally integrated into the building design and otherwise made as unobtrusive as possible. If possible, antennas shall be located entirely within an existing or newly created architectural feature so as to be completely screened from view. Façade-mounted antennas shall not extend more than 2 feet out from the building face. 17. Roof-Mounted Antenna. Roof-mounted antennas shall be constructed at the minimum height possible to serve the operator’s service area and shall be set back as far from the building edge as possible or otherwise screened to minimize visibility from the public right-of- way and adjacent properties. 18. Compliance with Photo Simulations. As a condition of approval and prior to final staff inspection of the WTS facility, the applicant shall submit evidence, e.g., photos, sufficient to prove that the facility is in substantial conformance with photo simulations provided with the initial application. Nonconformance shall require any necessary modification to achieve compliance within 90 days of notifying the applicant. 19. Noise. Noise from any equipment supporting the WTS facility shall comply with the regulations specified in OAR 340-035-0035. 20. Signage. No signs, striping, graphics, or other attention-getting devices are permitted on any WTS facility except for warning and safety signage that shall: a. Have a surface area of no more than 3 square feet; b. Be affixed to a fence or equipment cabinet; and c. Be limited to no more than 2 signs, unless more are required by any other applicable law. 21. Traffic Obstruction. Maintenance vehicles servicing WTS facilities located in the public or private right-of-way shall not park on the traveled way or in a manner that obstructs traffic. 22. Parking. No net loss in required on-site parking spaces shall occur as a result of the installation of any WTS facility. 23. Sidewalks and Pathways. Cabinets and other equipment shall not impair pedestrian use of sidewalks or other pedestrian paths or bikeways on public or private land. Revised 5/21/13 KL 12 of 14 24. Lighting. WTS facilities shall not include any beacon lights or strobe lights, unless required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or other applicable authority. If beacon lights or strobe lights are required, the Approval Authority shall review any available alternatives and approve the design with the least visual impact. All other site lighting for security and maintenance purposes shall be shielded and directed downward, and shall comply with the outdoor lighting standards in Section 4.5-100, unless required by any other applicable law. 25. Landscaping. For WTS facilities with towers that exceed the height limitations of the base zone, at least 1 row of evergreen trees or shrubs, not less than 4 feet high at the time of planting, and spaced out not more than 15 feet apart, shall be provided in the landscape setback. Shrubs shall be of a variety that can be expected to grow to form a continuous hedge at least 5 feet in height within 2 years of planting. Trees and shrubs in the vicinity of guy wires shall be of a kind that would not exceed 20 feet in height or would not affect the stability of the guys. In all other cases, the landscaping, screening and fence standards specified in Section 4.4-100 shall apply. 26. Prohibited WTS Facilities. a. Any high or moderate visibility WTS facility in the Historic Overlay District. b. Any WTS facility in the public right-of-way that severely limits access to abutting property, which limits public access or use of the sidewalk, or which constitutes a vision clearance violation. c. Any detached WTS facility taller than 150 feet above finished grade at the base of the tower. 27. Speculation. No application shall be accepted or approved for a speculation WTS tower, i.e., from an applicant that simply constructs towers and leases tower space to service carriers, but is not a service carrier, unless the applicant submits a binding written commitment or executed lease from a service carrier to utilize or lease space on the tower. 28. Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way. Small wireless facilities in the public right-of-way must comply with the following standards: a. Small wireless facility structures must meet the following height limits, whichever is more: i. 50 feet or less in height, including antenna height; or ii. No more than 10% taller than the existing structure or other adjacent utility poles, light poles, or similar structures. b. Each antenna associated with the small wireless facility, excluding associated antenna equipment, must be no more than 3 cubic feet in volume. c. All wireless equipment associated with the structure other than the antenna, including the wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any pre- existing associated equipment on the structure, must be no more than 28 cubic feet in volume. Antenna equipment includes only such equipment that is Revised 5/21/13 KL 13 of 14 associated with the antenna that is in the same fixed location as the antenna, and is installed at the same time as the antenna. d. All antennas on a small cell structure, excluding antenna equipment, must not total more than six cubic feet in volume, whether an array or separate. e. Antennas may not project more than five feet above or two feet laterally from the pole, as measured from the inside edge of the antenna to the surface of the pole, or the minimum necessary to achieve required safety clearances. Antennas may not exceed the diameter of the pole on which they are attached, or 16 inches in diameter, whichever is greater. f. All equipment must be mounted to the pole at least 10 feet above grade. Alternately, equipment may be located in an underground vault or another location on the pole upon approval by the City Engineer. g. Other than the antenna, antenna equipment, electric meter, and power disconnect, all pole-mounted equipment must be concealed in a single flush- mounted cabinet that complies with the dimensional standards in this section or otherwise entirely shielded from public view. EXCEPTION: Multiple equipment cabinets on a single pole are permitted only when necessary to comply with the pole owner’s joint use requirements. h. All cabling and wires that run between the antenna and equipment must be concealed or shielded inside conduit. i. All antennas, equipment, conduit, cabling, cabinets and ancillary parts must be painted or textured in a non-reflective neutral color that matches, or is compatible with, the pole. j. Where there are no existing overhead utilities, utility service lines and backhaul fiber must be located underground, unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. k. All new or replacement small wireless facility structures must comply with the following: i. A replacement small wireless facility structure must be placed as close to the same location as the existing structure as is possible, unless minor adjustments to location are needed to comply with ADA requirements or for public safety, as determined by the City Engineer. ii. A new small wireless facility structure is permitted only when no other existing structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to accommodate the small wireless facility, and no other structure in the right-of-way is available or suitable to be replaced or modified to accommodate the small wireless facility. iii. The location of a small wireless facility structure must allow sufficient clear space for safe passage on the sidewalk; must not be located within the vision clearance area; must not interfere with other utilities, traffic control Revised 5/21/13 KL 14 of 14 devices, or intersections; and must be safe, as determined by the City Engineer. l. Small wireless facilities are not permitted on decorative light poles and no decorative light poles will be removed or replaced to accommodate small wireless facilities. EXCEPTION: Upon a determination that no other option is reasonably available for meeting an identified capacity, coverage, or other service need, including locating the small wireless facility on private property outside the public right-of-way, the City will permit replacement of a decorative light pole with a small wireless facility that is camouflaged to match the existing decorative pole. m. The City may require design or concealment measures for small wireless facilities and associated structures in the Historic Overlay District. Any such design or concealment measures are not considered part of the small wireless facility for purpose of the size restrictions in this subsection. Removal of Facilities M. Abandonment or Discontinuation of Use. The following requirements apply to the abandonment and/or discontinuation of use for all WTS facilities: 1. All WTS facilities located on a utility pole shall be promptly removed at the operator’s expense at any time a utility is scheduled to be placed underground or otherwise moved. 2. All operators who intend to abandon or discontinue the use of any WTS facility shall notify the City of their intentions no less than 60 days prior to the final day of use. 3. WTS facilities shall be considered abandoned 90 days following the final day of use or operation. 4. All abandoned WTS facilities shall be physically removed by the service provider and/or property owner no more than 90 days following the final day of use or of determination that the facility has been abandoned, whichever occurs first. 5. The City reserves the right to remove any WTS facilities that are abandoned for more than 90 days at the expense of the facility owner. 6. Any abandoned site shall be restored to its natural or former condition. Grading and landscaping in good condition may remain. 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE ELIGIBLE FACILITIES REQUEST/SECTION 6409(a) NARRATIVE AT&T Site – EG02 Hwy 126 & Mohawk Submitted to City of Springfield Development & Public Works Planning & Development Applicant: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (“AT&T”) 19801 SW 72nd Avenue Suite 100 Tualatin, OR 97062 (425) 222-1026 Representative: Centerline Communications 8117 SE Vermont Street Hillsboro, OR 97123 Contact: Don Forsberg (503) 267-1947 dforsberg@clinellc.com Tower Owner: Crown Castle 2000 Corporate Drive Canonsburg, PA 15317 Property Owner: Northwest Self Storage Project Address: 2656 Olympic Street Springfield, OR 97477 Parcel Number: 1703254100102 Zoning Classification: HI Centerline Communications is submitting this narrative on behalf of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (“AT&T”) and the underlying property owner. 2 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD CODE 4.3.145 Wireless Telecommunications System (WTS) Facilities (G) Application Submittal Requirements. (1) Submittal Requirements for Low Visibility and Stealth Facilities (Type 1 Review). All applications for low visibility and stealth WTS facilities must submit the following reports and documentation: (a) Narrative. AT&T proposes to modify an existing WTS facility. The set of plans included with this application details all the proposed changes for the modification to this existing WTS facility. As detailed below, no changes are being proposed for an increase in height to the tower nor an expansion of existing ground space/disturbance. (b) Geographic Service Area. The tower is existing and this scope of work would have been completed at the time of original application of the tower. (c) Co-Location. The tower was designed for co-location and there is already more than one carrier on the tower. (d) Plot Plan. See attached drawings as part of this application. (e) RF Emissions. RF emissions report is included as part of this application. (f) Description of Service. No change is proposed. (g) Provider Information. No change is proposed. 3 (h) Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation. No change is proposed. (i) FCC, BAA or Other Required Licenses and Determinations. These were completed with the original tower application. (j) Small Wireless Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way. Does not apply. 4 FCC Rules for Eligible Facilities Request The Spectrum Act states that “a State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station.”1 An “eligible facilities request” is defined to include any collocation, removal, or replacement of existing equipment.2 The FCC adopted rules providing legally binding guidance on key terms of the Spectrum Act, notably defining “substantial change” with the six thresholds described below.3 The FCC requires that qualifying eligible facilities requests be approved within 60 days, subject to tolling for incompleteness.4 The 60-day period begins when an applicant takes the first procedural step required by a local government, and submits written documentation.5 The only submittal documents a local government can require are those relevant to determining if a proposed modification qualifies as an eligible facilities request.6 If a local government does not render a decision within the 60-day period, an eligible facilities request can be deemed granted by operation of law.7 The Proposed Modification Does Not Constitute a “Substantial Change” Below are the FCC’s six “substantial change” thresholds for a wireless tower not in the right- of-way,8 each followed by an explanation that the proposed modification does not exceed that threshold. 1) It increases the height of the tower by more than 10% or by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed twenty feet, whichever is greater. Applicant Response: The proposal does not increase the height of the existing tower. This threshold is met. 2) It involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than twenty feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater. Applicant Response: The proposal does not add any appurtenances to the body of the tower that protrude from the edge of the tower more than twenty feet. This threshold is met. 3) Involves the installation of more than the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved, but not to exceed four. 5 Applicant Response: No cabinets are being added with this project and there are not more than four existing cabinets. This threshold is met. 4) It entails any excavation or deployment of transmission equipment outside of the current site by more than 30 feet in any direction. The site boundary from which 30 feet is measured excludes any access or utility easements currently related to the site. The “site” is as defined at 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b)(6). Applicant Response: The proposal does not entail any excavation or deployment of transmission equipment outside of the current site by more than 30 feet in any direction. This threshold is met. 5) Would defeat any concealment elements of the existing facility. Applicant Response: There are no concealment elements for the existing facility and none are proposed. This threshold is met. 6) Does not comply with conditions associated with the prior approval of the existing facility, unless the non-compliance is due only to a change in height, width, etc., that does not exceed the first four thresholds. Applicant Response: There are no prior conditions of approval that would render the modification to be non-compliant, aside from any conditions that would be preempted by the first four “substantial change” thresholds. In sum, the modification clearly qualifies as an “eligible facilities request” under the Spectrum Act and FCC rules, because it does not exceed any of the thresholds such that it would “substantially change” the physical dimensions of the existing tower. Failure to process this eligible facilities request and approve all necessary permits within 60 days may result in the request being deemed granted by operation of law. 1 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a)(1). 2 47 U.S.C. § 1455(a)(2). 3 See Report and Order FCC 14-153, 29 FCC Rcd. 12865 (FCC October 17, 2014); see also Report and Order FCC 20-153, 2020 WL 6501650 (FCC October 27, 2020). 4 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(c)(2), (3). 5 Declaratory Ruling 20-75, 35 FCC Rcd 5977, ¶ 16 (FCC June 9, 2020). 6 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(c)(1). 7 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(c)(4). 8 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.6100(b)(7). Property Owner Letter of Authorization CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OR 225 5TH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Re: Letter of Authorization I hereby represent that the undersigned entity of Crown Castle is the Attorney-in-Fact for the legal owners of the property referenced below, and I hereby authorize AT&T MOBILITY and/or its Agent(s), to act as our Agent(s) in processing of all zoning applications, building permits and approvals through the CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OR for the existing wireless communications site described as: Crown Site ID: 879543/SPRINGFIELD AT&T MOBILITY Site ID: EG02/Hwy 126 & Mohawk Site Address: 2656 OLYMPIC AVE., SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 APN: 1459724 Owners: WARREN HOWARD PARTNERSHIP #3 by their Attorney-in-Fact Global Signal Acquisitions II LLC By: ________________________________ Date: ____________________ Chris Staley Real Estate Specialist II 5/6/2024 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 1 Radio Frequency Safety Survey Report Prediction (RFSSRP) AT&T Monopole Facility Site Name EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK Site ID EG02 Site Address 2656 OLYMPIC STREET, SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Latitude: 44.059828 Longitude: -122.987762 USID: 83530 FA: 10127841 Centerline PN: Internal Pace ID: MRWOR073320 Prepared for: Centerline on behalf of AT&T Report Date: May 9, 2024 Report Writer: Benjamin Black Report Reviewer: Yasir Alqadhili Statement of Compliance AT&T will be compliant with FCC Regulations upon installation of recommended mitigation measures. EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL SUMMARY....................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 SITE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 SITE MITIGATION ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 SITE SCALE MAP ............................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 ANTENNA INVENTORY ................................................................................................................... 7 4.0 CALCULATED RF EXPOSURE LEVELS ..................................................................................... 10 5.0 RF EXPOSURE DIAGRAMS ........................................................................................................... 11 6.0 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE .................................................................................................. 18 6.1 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................ 18 APPENDIX A: AT&T RF SIGNAGE .................................................................................................... 19 APPENDIX B: FCC GUIDELINES AND EMISSIONS THRESHOLD LIMITS ............................. 20 APPENDIX C: CALCULATION METHODOLOGY .......................................................................... 22 APPENDIX D: CERTIFICATIONS ....................................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX E: PROPRIETARY STATEMENT ................................................................................... 24 EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 3 1.0 GENERAL SUMMARY Centerline has been contracted to provide a Radio Frequency (RF) Analysis for the following AT&T monopole facility to determine whether the facility is in compliance with federal standards and regulations regarding RF emissions. This analysis includes theoretical emissions calculations for all equipment for AT&T. 1.1 SITE SUMMARY Analysis Site Data Site USID: 83530 Site FA#: 10127841 Site Name: EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK Site Address: 2656 OLYMPIC STREET, SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Site Latitude: 44.059828 Site Longitude: -122.987762 Facility Type: Monopole Compliance Summary Compliance Status: Compliant Upon Mitigation Maximum Calculated AT&T MPE Level on Site (General Population Limit): 2.06% Maximum Calculated Composite MPE Level on Site (General Population Limit): 4.84% Maximum Calculated AT&T MPE Level at Ground (General Population Limit): 2.06% Maximum Calculated Composite MPE Level at Ground (General Population Limit): 4.84% Site Data Information CD: 10127841_AE201_20240306_3898A19ZSM_PCD_redlines DF_Rev01 RFDS: EG08_Hwy 126 & Mohawk_10127841_RFDS_04.08.24 EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 4 1.2 SITE MITIGATION Signage and barriers are the primary means of mitigating accessible areas of exposure. Below is a summary of existing and recommended signage at this AT&T facility. Existing Signage and Barriers (AT&T Sectors) Location Information Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Caution 2B Caution 2C Warning Warning 2 Barriers Monopole Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recommended Signage and Barriers (AT&T Sectors) – Actions that MUST be Taken Location Notice 2 Caution 2 Caution 2B Caution 2C Warning 2 Barriers Monopole Base 0 0 1 0 0 0 Final Compliant Configuration (AT&T Sectors) – All Mitigation Items that MUST be in Place Location Information Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Caution 2B Caution 2C Warning Warning 2 Barriers Monopole Base 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 AT&T Policy Items: • Install (1) Caution 2B sign on the monopole base. EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 5 2.0 SITE SCALE MAP All Sectors Grid size: 10’ INFO 1 Caution 2 Notice 1 Caution 2B Notice 2 Caution 2C Caution 1 Warning 2 Existing Barrier Proposed Barrier Items to be removed Existing Sign Proposed Sign Signage / Mitigation Plan EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 10127841 Caution 2B EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 6 Monopole Base Grid size: 10’ INFO 1 Caution 2 Notice 1 Caution 2B Notice 2 Caution 2C Caution 1 Warning 2 Existing Barrier Proposed Barrier Items to be removed Existing Sign Proposed Sign Signage / Mitigation Plan EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 10127841 Caution 2B EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 7 3.0 ANTENNA INVENTORY ANT ID Operator Antenna Manufacturer Antenna Model System / Freq (MHz) TPO (Watts) Gain (dBd) Total ERP (Watts) Azimuth (°) Mech. Tilt (°) Elec. Tilt (°) Antenna Length (ft.) Antenna Centerline Height Antenna Bottom Tip Height 01 AT&T ACE XXQLH-654L4H8- IVT-V2 LTE 700 180 13.65 4171.31 30 0 0 to 10 8 130 01 01 AT&T ACE XXQLH-654L4H8- IVT-V2 LTE 850 180 13.95 4469.64 30 0 0 to 10 8 130 01 01 AT&T ACE XXQLH-654L4H8- IVT-V2 WCS 2300 75 15.65 2754.62 30 0 0 to 10 8 130 01 02 AT&T Ericsson AIR 6419 B77G Envelope 3.45GHz 108.4 23.05 21887.16 30 0 6 2.35 128.16 02 03 AT&T Ericsson AIR 6419 B77D Envelope 3.7GHz 108.4 23.55 24557.8 30 0 6 2.35 131.84 03 04 AT&T KMW EPBQ-654L8H8 LTE 700 120 13.45 2655.71 30 0 0 to 12 7.64 130 04 04 AT&T KMW EPBQ-654L8H8 LTE 1900 180 15.15 5892.13 30 0 0 to 10 7.64 130 04 04 AT&T KMW EPBQ-654L8H8 LTE 2100 180 15.35 6169.82 30 0 0 to 10 7.64 130 04 05 AT&T ACE XXQLH-654L4H8- IVT-V2 LTE 700 180 13.65 4171.31 220 0 0 to 10 8 130 05 05 AT&T ACE XXQLH-654L4H8- IVT-V2 LTE 850 180 13.95 4469.64 220 0 0 to 10 8 130 05 05 AT&T ACE XXQLH-654L4H8- IVT-V2 WCS 2300 75 15.65 2754.62 220 0 0 to 10 8 130 05 06 AT&T Ericsson AIR 6419 B77G Envelope 3.45GHz 108.4 23.05 21887.16 220 0 6 2.35 128.16 06 07 AT&T Ericsson AIR 6419 B77D Envelope 3.7GHz 108.4 23.55 24557.8 220 0 6 2.35 131.84 07 08 AT&T KMW EPBQ-654L8H8 LTE 700 120 13.45 2655.71 220 0 0 to 12 7.64 130 08 08 AT&T KMW EPBQ-654L8H8 LTE 1900 180 15.15 5892.13 220 0 0 to 10 7.64 130 08 08 AT&T KMW EPBQ-654L8H8 LTE 2100 180 15.35 6169.82 220 0 0 to 10 7.64 130 08 09 AT&T ACE XXQLH-654L4H8- IVT-V2 LTE 700 180 13.65 4171.31 300 0 0 to 10 8 130 09 09 AT&T ACE XXQLH-654L4H8- IVT-V2 LTE 850 180 13.95 4469.64 300 0 0 to 10 8 130 09 09 AT&T ACE XXQLH-654L4H8- IVT-V2 WCS 2300 75 15.65 2754.62 300 0 0 to 10 8 130 09 10 AT&T Ericsson AIR 6419 B77G Envelope 3.45GHz 108.4 23.05 21887.16 300 0 6 2.35 128.16 10 EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 8 ANT ID Operator Antenna Manufacturer Antenna Model System / Freq (MHz) TPO (Watts) Gain (dBd) Total ERP (Watts) Azimuth (°) Mech. Tilt (°) Elec. Tilt (°) Antenna Length (ft.) Antenna Centerline Height Antenna Bottom Tip Height 11 AT&T Ericsson AIR 6419 B77D Envelope 3.7GHz 108.4 23.55 24557.8 300 0 6 2.35 131.84 11 12 AT&T KMW EPBQ-654L8H8 LTE 700 120 13.45 2655.71 300 0 0 to 12 7.64 130 12 12 AT&T KMW EPBQ-654L8H8 LTE 1900 180 15.15 5892.13 300 0 0 to 10 7.64 130 12 12 AT&T KMW EPBQ-654L8H8 LTE 2100 180 15.35 6169.82 300 0 0 to 10 7.64 130 12 13 T-Mobile Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 700 120 13.85 2911.93 0 0 2 7.99 120 116.005 13 T-Mobile Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 850 120 13.95 2979.76 0 0 2 7.99 120 116.005 14 T-Mobile Generic Panel 3ft. LTE 2500 240 22.35 41229.8 0 0 6 2.83 120 118.585 15 T-Mobile Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 1900 320 16.95 15854.41 0 0 2 7.99 120 116.005 15 T-Mobile Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 2100 160 16.95 7927.2 0 0 2 7.99 120 116.005 16 T-Mobile Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 700 120 13.85 2911.93 120 0 2 7.99 120 116.005 16 T-Mobile Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 850 120 13.95 2979.76 120 0 2 7.99 120 116.005 17 T-Mobile Generic Panel 3ft. LTE 2500 240 22.35 41229.8 120 0 6 2.83 120 118.585 18 T-Mobile Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 1900 320 16.95 15854.41 120 0 2 7.99 120 116.005 18 T-Mobile Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 2100 160 16.95 7927.2 120 0 2 7.99 120 116.005 19 T-Mobile Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 700 120 13.85 2911.93 240 0 2 7.99 120 116.005 19 T-Mobile Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 850 120 13.95 2979.76 240 0 2 7.99 120 116.005 20 T-Mobile Generic Panel 3ft. LTE 2500 240 22.35 41229.8 240 0 6 2.83 120 118.585 21 T-Mobile Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 1900 320 16.95 15854.41 240 0 2 7.99 120 116.005 21 T-Mobile Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 2100 160 16.95 7927.2 240 0 2 7.99 120 116.005 22 Dish Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 700 120 12.65 2208.93 0 0 2 6 140 137 22 Dish Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 850 120 12.65 2208.93 0 0 2 6 140 137 22 Dish Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 1900 160 16.65 7398.1 0 0 2 6 140 137 22 Dish Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 2100 160 16.65 7398.1 0 0 2 6 140 137 EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 9 ANT ID Operator Antenna Manufacturer Antenna Model System / Freq (MHz) TPO (Watts) Gain (dBd) Total ERP (Watts) Azimuth (°) Mech. Tilt (°) Elec. Tilt (°) Antenna Length (ft.) Antenna Centerline Height Antenna Bottom Tip Height 23 Dish Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 700 120 12.65 2208.93 120 0 2 6 140 137 23 Dish Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 850 120 12.65 2208.93 120 0 2 6 140 137 23 Dish Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 1900 160 16.65 7398.1 120 0 2 6 140 137 23 Dish Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 2100 160 16.65 7398.1 120 0 2 6 140 137 24 Dish Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 700 120 12.65 2208.93 240 0 2 6 140 137 24 Dish Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 850 120 12.65 2208.93 240 0 2 6 140 137 24 Dish Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 1900 160 16.65 7398.1 240 0 2 6 140 137 24 Dish Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 2100 160 16.65 7398.1 240 0 2 6 140 137 25 Other Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 700 160 12.75 3013.84 0 0 0 6 150 147 25 Other Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 850 160 12.85 3084.04 0 0 0 6 150 147 26 Other Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 1900 160 16.25 6747.14 0 0 0 6 150 147 26 Other Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 2100 160 16.25 6747.14 0 0 0 6 150 147 27 Other Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 700 160 12.75 3013.84 120 0 0 6 150 147 27 Other Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 850 160 12.85 3084.04 120 0 0 6 150 147 28 Other Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 1900 160 16.25 6747.14 120 0 0 6 150 147 28 Other Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 2100 160 16.25 6747.14 120 0 0 6 150 147 29 Other Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 700 160 12.75 3013.84 240 0 0 6 150 147 29 Other Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 850 160 12.85 3084.04 240 0 0 6 150 147 30 Other Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 1900 160 16.25 6747.14 240 0 0 6 150 147 30 Other Generic Panel 6ft. LTE 2100 160 16.25 6747.14 240 0 0 6 150 147 Note: Z Value represents the centerline height of the antenna above ground 75% duty cycle is assumed for all AT&T antennas AIR6419 antennas were calculated using AT&T’s preferred conservative power reduction factor of 0.32 EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 10 4.0 CALCULATED RF EXPOSURE LEVELS Calculations performed based upon the data listed for this facility have produced the results that are shown below: Maximum Calculated AT&T MPE Level on Site: % of MPE Limit: Accessible General Population MPE Limits: 2.06% Accessible Occupational MPE Limits: 0.41% Maximum Calculated Composite MPE Level on Site: % of MPE Limit: Accessible General Population MPE Limits: 4.84% Accessible Occupational MPE Limits: 0.97% Maximum Calculated AT&T Ground Level MPE: % of MPE Limit: Accessible General Population MPE Limits: 2.06% Accessible Occupational MPE Limits: 0.41% Maximum Calculated Composite Ground Level MPE: % of MPE Limit: Accessible General Population MPE Limits: 4.84% Accessible Occupational MPE Limits: 0.97% EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 11 5.0 RF EXPOSURE DIAGRAMS Overview All Carriers Grid Size: 10’ EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 12 Overview AT&T Only Grid Size: 10’ EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 13 Overview AT&T Antenna Level Grid Size: 10’ EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 14 Alpha Sector Overview Grid Size: 10’ EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 15 Beta Sector Overview Grid Size: 10’ EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 16 Gamma Sector Overview Grid Size: 10’ EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 17 Elevation View Grid Size: 10’ EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 18 6.0 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Centerline conducted worst case modeling to determine whether the subject facility is in compliance with FCC regulations. Based on the information analyzed, AT&T will be compliant with FCC Regulations once the mitigation measures recommended in this report are implemented. 6.1 RECOMMENDATIONS Existing Signage and Barriers (AT&T Sectors) Location Information Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Caution 2B Caution 2C Warning Warning 2 Barriers Monopole Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Recommended Signage and Barriers (AT&T Sectors) – Actions that MUST be Taken Location Notice 2 Caution 2 Caution 2B Caution 2C Warning 2 Barriers Monopole Base 0 0 1 0 0 0 Final Compliant Configuration (AT&T Sectors) – All Mitigation Items that MUST be in Place Location Information Notice Notice 2 Caution Caution 2 Caution 2B Caution 2C Warning Warning 2 Barriers Monopole Base 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 AT&T Policy Items: • Install (1) Caution 2B sign on the monopole base. EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 19 APPENDIX A: AT&T RF SIGNAGE Sign Description Sign Description Information 1 Sign Gives guidelines on how to proceed and who to contact regarding areas that may exceed either the FCC’s General Population or Occupational emissions limits. Caution 2C Sign Gives specific information on how to proceed and who to contact regarding antennas that are façade mounted, concealed or on stand-alone structures. Blue Notice 1 Sign Used to alert individuals that they are entering an area that may exceed the FCC’s General Population emissions limit. Must be positioned such that persons approaching from any angle have ample warning to avoid the marked areas. Blue Notice 2 Sign Used to alert individuals that they are entering an area that may exceed the FCC’s General Population emissions limits. To be used on barriers or antenna sectors as a hybrid of the Information 1 and Blue Notice 1 signs. Yellow Caution 1 Sign- Rooftop Used to inform individuals that they are entering an area that may exceed the FCC’s Occupational emissions limit. Must be positioned such that persons approaching from any angle have ample warning to avoid the marked areas. Yellow Caution 2 Sign- Rooftop Used to alert individuals that they are entering an area that may exceed the FCC’s Occupational emissions limit. To be used on barriers or antenna sectors as a hybrid of the Information 1 and Yellow Caution 1 signs. Yellow Caution 2B Sign- Tower Used to inform individuals that they are entering an area that may exceed the FCC’s Occupational emissions limits. Must be placed at the base of the tower to warn tower climbers of potential for exposure. Warning 2 Sign Used to inform individuals that they are entering an area that may exceed the FCC’s Occupational emissions limit by a factor of 10 or greater. Must be positioned such that persons approaching from any angle have ample warning to avoid the marked areas. EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 20 APPENDIX B: FCC GUIDELINES AND EMISSIONS THRESHOLD LIMITS All information used in this report was analyzed as a percentage of the Maximum Permissible Exposure (% MPE) limits as detailed in 47 CFR § 1.1310 as well as Federal Communications Commission (FCC) OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-01. The FCC MPE limits are typically expressed in units of milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm2) or microwatts per square centimeter (µW/cm2). The exposure limits vary depending upon the frequencies being utilized. The General Population/Uncontrolled MPE limit (in mW/cm2) for frequencies between 300 and 1500 is defined as frequency (in MHz) divided by 1500 (fMHz/1500). Frequencies between 1500 and 100,000 MHz have a General Population/Uncontrolled MPE limit of 1 mW/cm2 (1000 µW/cm2). The calculated power density at each sample point divided by the limit at each calculated frequency provides a result in % MPE. Summing the calculated % MPE from all contributors provides a cumulative % MPE at a particular sample point. Because exposure limits may vary for each frequency band, it is necessary to report % MPE rather than power density. All results were compared to the FCC radio frequency exposure rules as detailed in 47 CFR § 1.1307(b) to determine compliance with the MPE limits for General Population/Uncontrolled environments as defined below. General population/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general population may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general population would always be considered under this category when exposure is not employment related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a nearby residential area. Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/ controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general population/uncontrolled limits, as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. Additional details can be found in FCC OET 65. The FCC mandates that if a site is found to be out of compliance with regard to exposure, any system operator contributing 5% or more to areas exceeding the FCC’s allowable limits will be responsible for bringing the site into compliance. Additional details can be found in FCC OET 65. EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 21 Limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) (A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (E) (V/m) Magnetic Field Strength (H) (A/m) Power Density (S) (mW/cm2) Averaging Time [E]2, [H]2, or S (minutes) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 3.0-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f2)* 6 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1,500 -- -- f/300 6 1,500-100,000 -- -- 5 6 (B) Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure Frequency Range (MHz) Electric Field Strength (E) (V/m) Magnetic Field Strength (H) (A/m) Power Density (S) (mW/cm2) Averaging Time [E]2, [H]2, or S (minutes) 0.3-1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34-30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f2)* 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1,500 -- -- f/1,500 30 1,500-100,000 -- -- 1.0 30 f = Frequency in (MHz) * Plane-wave equivalent power density EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 22 APPENDIX C: CALCULATION METHODOLOGY IXUS electromagnetic energy (EME) calculation software was used to assess all RF field levels presented in this study. IXUS software uses a fast and accurate EME calculation tool that allows for the determination of RF field strength in the vicinity of radio communication base stations and transmitters. At its core, the IXUS EME calculation module implements evaluation techniques detailed in the ITU-T K.61, CENELEC EN 50383, and IEC 62232 specifications and referenced in C95.3 IEEE Recommended Practice for Measurements and Computations of Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields with Respect to Human Exposure to Such Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz. The EME calculation result at any point in 3D space is achieved via a synthetic ray tracing technique, a conservative cylindrical envelope method, or through full-wave electromagnetic simulation. The ray tracing method is an advanced computation method described in IEC 622322 where the power is summed from elemental sources representing the individual components of the antenna which are selected by an analysis of published manufacturer datasheets and antenna pattern information. The selection of the solution method is determined by the particular antenna being considered. EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 23 APPENDIX D: CERTIFICATIONS I, Benjamin Black, preparer of this report certify that I am fully trained and aware of the rules and regulations of both the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with regard to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation. I have been trained in the procedures and requirements outlined in AT&T’s RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document. Benjamin Black 5/9/2024 I, Yasir Alqadhili, reviewer and approver of this report certify that I am fully trained and aware of the rules and regulations of both the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with regard to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation. I have been trained in the procedures and requirements outlined in AT&T’s RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines document. Yasir Alqadhili 5/9/2024 EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWK / 83530 / 10127841 Centerline • 750 W Center Street • West Bridgewater • MA • 02379 P a g e | 24 APPENDIX E: PROPRIETARY STATEMENT This report was prepared for the use of AT&T to meet all applicable FCC requirements. It was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same locale under like circumstances. The conclusions provided by Centerline are based solely on the information provided by AT&T and all observations in this report are valid on the date of the investigation. Any additional information that becomes available concerning the site should be provided to Centerline so that our conclusions may be revised and modified, if necessary. This report has been prepared in accordance with Standard Conditions for Engagement and authorized proposal, both of which are integral parts of this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. F I R S T A M E R I C A N T I T L E P r o p e r t y R e s e a r c h R e p o r t SUBJECT PROPERTY 2656 Olympic St Parcel #: 1459724 Map & Taxlot #: 1703254100102 County: Lane OWNER Northwest Self Storage DATE PREPARED Date: 05/30/2024 PREPARED BY rrizo@firstam.com Customer Service Department 503.219.8746 cs.oregon@firstam.com ©2018 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. | NYSE: FAF | 39203000418 IMPORTANT – READ CAREFULLY: THIS REPORT IS NOT AN INSURED PRODUCT OR SERVICE OR A REPRESENTATION OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY. IT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT OR PRELIMINARY REPORT, OR ANY FORM OF TITLE INSURANCE OR GUARANTY. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE APPLICANT THEREFOR, AND MAY NOT BE USED OR RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PERSON. THIS REPORT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WITHOUT FIRST AMERICAN’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. FIRST AMERICAN DOES NOT REPRESENT OR WARRANT THAT THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS COMPLETE OR FREE FROM ERROR, AND THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS PROVIDED WITHOUT ANY WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, AS-IS, AND WITH ALL FAULTS. AS A MATERIAL PART OF THE CONSIDERATION GIVEN IN EXCHANGE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THIS REPORT, RECIPIENT AGREES THAT FIRST AMERICAN’S SOLE LIABILITY FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY AN ERROR OR OMISSION DUE TO INACCURATE INFORMATION OR NEGLIGENCE IN PREPARING THIS REPORT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE FEE CHARGED FOR THE REPORT, IF ANY. RECIPIENT ACCEPTS THIS REPORT WITH THIS LIMITATION AND AGREES THAT FIRST AMERICAN WOULD NOT HAVE ISSUED THIS REPORT BUT FOR THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY DESCRIBED ABOVE. FIRST AMERICAN MAKES NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY AS TO THE LEGALITY OR PROPRIETY OF RECIPIENT’S USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN. Customer Service Department 503.219.8746 cs.oregon@firstam.com Date: 05/30/2024 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner:Northwest Self Storage Parcel #:1459724 CoOwner:Ref Parcel #:1703254100102 Site:2656 Olympic St Springfield OR 97477 TRS:17S / 03W / 25 / SE Mail:14855 SE 82nd Dr Clackamas OR 97015 County:Lane PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Map Grid: Census Tract:003400 Block: 1001 Neighborhood:90201 School Dist:19 Springfield Impr Type: Subdiv/Plat:Billboard Land Use:231 - COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL ZONE, IMPROVED Std Land Use:CMSC - Commercial Miscellaneous Zoning:Springfield-LMI - Light-Medium Industrial Lat/Lon:44.060794 / -122.987879 Watershed:Muddy Creek-Willamette River Legal:Map Lot: 1703254100102, TRS: T17 R03 S25 Q41, Lot: TL 00102 ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION Market Land:$1,092,133.00 Market Impr:$4,514,604.00 Market Total:$5,606,737.00 (2023) % Improved:81.00% Assessed Total:$1,823,930.00 (2023) Levy Code:01900 Tax:$33,423.88 (2023) Millage Rate:18.3252 Exemption:$0.00 Exemption Type: PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms:0 Total SqFt:0 SqFt Year Built:0 Baths, Total:0 First Floor:0 SqFt Eff Year Built: Baths, Full:0 Second Floor:0 SqFt Lot Size Ac:2.14 Acres Baths, Half:0 Basement Fin:0 SqFt Lot Size SF:93,218 SqFt Total Units:0 Basement Unfin:Lot Width:0 # Stories: Basement Total:0 SqFt Lot Depth:0 # Fireplaces:0 Attic Fin:0 SqFt Roof Material: Cooling:Attic Unfin:0 SqFt Roof Shape: Heating:Attic Total:0 SqFt Ext Walls: Building Style:Garage:0 SqFt Const Type: SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Owner Date Doc #Sale Price Deed Type Loan Amt Loan Type SPRINGFIELD MINI STORAGE LLC 06/13/2013 31739 Deed Of Trust $27,084.00 Conventional SPRINGFIELD MINI STORAGE LLC 10/30/2012 2012-056628056628 BS Northwest Self Storage 10/30/2012 2012-056628056628 Deed Conv/Unk HOWARD FAMILY TRUST 06/19/2012 30127 Deed $1,200,000.00 Conventional WIMBERLY M WARREN 05/21/2009 27420 Deed Of Trust $1,320,200.00 Conventional WIMBERLY M WARREN 09/08/2000 52014 Deed Conv/Unk KEVIN HOWARD 01/01/2000 65506 Deed Conv/Unk CAMERON J WARREN 05/07/1999 41351 Deed $1,556,250.00 Conventional KEVIN HOWARD 05/03/1995 25999 Quit Claim Conv/Unk BOBETTE HOWARD 07/13/1992 44698 Quit Claim Conv/Unk KEVIN HOWARD 01/01/1991 21896 Deed Conv/Unk Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and its customers make no representations, warranties or conditions, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. IMPROVEMENT:PARCEL ID: 1459724 Year Built:0 Total SqFt:0 Condition: Bedrooms:0 Finished SqFt:0 Unfinished SqFt:0 Bath Total:0 1st Floor SqFt:0 Carport SqFt:0 Garage SqFt:0 2nd Floor SqFt:0 Heat Type: Basement Unfin SqFt:0 Attic Fin SqFt:0 Ext. Wall: Basement Fin SqFt:0 Attic Unin SqFt:0 Foundation: Floor Dsc: Customer Service Department 503.219.8746 cs.oregon@firstam.com Date: 05/30/2024 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner:Meadow Advertising Parcel #:1805181 CoOwner:Ref Parcel #:1703254100102 Site:2656 Olympic St Springfield OR 97477 TRS:17S / 03W / 25 / SE Mail:PO Box 331 The Dalles OR 97058 County:Lane PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Map Grid: Census Tract:003400 Block: 1001 Neighborhood:80487 School Dist:19 Springfield Impr Type: Subdiv/Plat:Billboard Land Use:201 - COMMERCIAL, IMPROVED Std Land Use:CMSC - Commercial Miscellaneous Zoning:Springfield-LMI - Light-Medium Industrial Lat/Lon:44.060794 / -122.987879 Watershed:Muddy Creek-Willamette River Legal:Map Lot: 1703254100102, TRS: T17 R03 S25 Q41, Subdivision: BILLBOARD, Lot: TL 00102- 901 ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION Market Land:$0.00 Market Impr:$77,203.00 Market Total:$77,203.00 (2023) % Improved:100.00% Assessed Total:$71,003.00 (2023) Levy Code:01900 Tax:$1,301.14 (2023) Millage Rate:18.3252 Exemption: Exemption Type: PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms: Total SqFt: Year Built: Baths, Total: First Floor: Eff Year Built: Baths, Full: Second Floor: Lot Size Ac:2.13 Acres Baths, Half: Basement Fin: Lot Size SF:92,996 SqFt Total Units: Basement Unfin: Lot Width: # Stories: Basement Total: Lot Depth: # Fireplaces: Attic Fin: Roof Material: Cooling:Attic Unfin: Roof Shape: Heating:Attic Total: Ext Walls: Building Style:Garage: Const Type: SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Owner Date Doc #Sale Price Deed Type Loan Amt Loan Type SPRINGFIELD MINI STORAGE LLC 06/13/2013 31739 Deed Of Trust $27,084.00 Conventional Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and its customers make no representations, warranties or conditions, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Site Address N/A Map & Taxlot#17-03-25-41-00102 SIC 901 Tax Account#1805181 Property Owner 1 Meadow Advertising PO Box 331 The Dalles, OR 97058 Tax account acreage data not available Mapped taxlot acreage† 2.13 † Mapped Taxlot Acreage is the estimated size of a taxlot as derived from the county GIS taxlot layer, and is not to be used for legal purposes. Related Accts 1459724 Maps Map & Taxlot # 17-03-25-41-00102 Business Information RLID does not contain any business data for this address Improvements Photos & Sketches for Tax Account Site Address Information No site address associated with this tax account number General Taxlot Characteristics Geographic Coordinates X 4267344 Y 882281 (State Plane X,Y) Latitude 44.0608 Longitude -122.9879 Zoning Zoning Jurisdiction Springfield Springfield Parent Zone LMI Light Medium Industrial Taxlot Characteristics Incorporated City Limits Springfield Urban Growth Boundary Springfield Year Annexed 1969 Annexation #Unknown/No ID Approximate Taxlot Acreage 2.13 Approx Taxlot Sq Footage 92,783 Plan Designation Light Medium Industrial Eugene Neighborhood N/A Metro Area Nodal Dev Area No Land Use General Land Use Code Description data not available data not available Detailed Land Use Code Description data not available data not available Septic data not available Well data not available Landscaping Quality data not available Historic Property Name N/A City Historic Landmark?No National Historical Register?No Service Providers Fire Protection Provider Eugene Springfield Fire Ambulance Provider Eugene Springfield Fire Ambulance District EC Ambulance Service Area East/Central LTD Service Area?Yes LTD Ride Source?Yes Environmental Data FEMA Flood Hazard Zone Code Description X Areas determined to be outside of 500-year flood. FIRM Map Number 41039C1161F Community Number 039C Post-FIRM Date data not available Panel Printed?Yes Soils Soil Map Unit#Soil Type Description % of Taxlot Ag Class Hydric % 76 Malabon-Urban Land Complex 72%1 0 101 Oxley-Urban Land Complex 23%3 5 119 Salem-Urban Land Complex 5%2 0 Schools Code Name School District 19 Springfield Elementary School 550 Maple Middle School 542 Briggs High School 560 Springfield Political Districts Election Precinct 2456 City Council Ward S4 City Councilor Beth Blackwell County Commissioner District 2 (Springfield) County Commissioner David Loveall EWEB Commissioner N/A LCC Board Zone 3 Lane ESD Board Zone data not available State Representative District 7 State Representative John Lively State Senate District 4 State Senator Floyd Prozanski Emerald PUD Board Zone N/A Heceta PUD Board Zone N/A Central Lincoln PUD Board Zone N/A Soil Water Cons. Dist/Zone Upper Willamette / 2 Creswell Water Control District data not available Census Information Census data have been removed from this report. To obtain Census data, please visit www.census.gov. For questions or concerns, please contact support@rlid.org. Liens None. RLID displays liens issued by Cottage Grove, Florence, and Springfield Utility Board. Additional liens can be found in Deeds and Records. Building Permits Please check the State of Oregon ePermitting System. Land Use Applications RLID does not contain any landuse application data for this jurisdiction Petitions RLID does not contain any petition data for this jurisdiction Tax Statements & Tax Receipts Account#: 1805181 View tax statement(s) for: 2023 2022 Tax Receipts Receipt Date Amount Received Tax Discount Interest Applied Amount 11/08/2023 $1,262.11 $1,262.11 $39.03 $0.00 $1,301.14 11/15/2022 $1,220.84 $1,220.84 $37.76 $0.00 $1,258.60 11/09/2021 $1,198.95 $1,198.95 $37.08 $0.00 $1,236.03 11/12/2020 $1,163.95 $1,163.95 $36.00 $0.00 $1,199.95 11/13/2019 $1,128.95 $1,128.95 $34.92 $0.00 $1,163.87 Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Owner/Taxpayer Owners Owner Address City/State/Zip Meadow Advertising PO Box 331 The Dalles, OR 97058 Taxpayer Party Name Address City/State/Zip Meadow Advertising PO Box 331 The Dalles, OR 97058 Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Account Status Status Active Account Current Tax Year Related Accts 1459724 Account Status none Remarks Billboard Special Assessment Program N/A Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation General Tax Account Information Tax Account Acreage data not available Fire Acres N/A Property Class 201 - Commercial, improved Statistical Class 487 - Billboards/outdoor ads Neighborhood 80487 - Countywide Billboards Category County Industrial - Improvement only Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Township-Range-Section / Subdivision Data Subdivision Type N/A Subdivision Name Billboard Subdivision Number N/A Phase N/A Lot/Tract/Unit #TL 00102-901 Recording Number N/A Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Property Values & Taxes The values shown are the values certified in October unless a value change has been processed on the property. Value changes typically occur as a result of appeals, clerical errors and omitted property. The tax shown is the amount certified in October. This is the full amount of tax for the year indicated and does not include any discounts offered, payments made, interest owing or previous years owing. It also does not reflect any value changes. Real Market Value (RMV)Total Assessed Value Tax Year Land Improvement Total 2023 $0 $77,203 $77,203 $71,003 $1,301.14 2022 $0 $77,203 $77,203 $68,935 $1,258.60 2021 $0 $77,203 $77,203 $66,928 $1,236.03 2020 $0 $77,203 $77,203 $64,979 $1,199.95 2019 $0 $77,203 $77,203 $63,087 $1,163.87 2018 $0 $77,203 $77,203 $61,250 $1,097.13 2017 $0 $75,690 $75,690 $59,466 $1,054.96 2016 $0 $75,690 $75,690 $57,734 $1,032.80 2015 $0 $75,690 $75,690 $56,052 $1,003.35 2014 $0 $75,690 $75,690 $54,419 $ 988.19 2013 $0 $75,690 $75,690 $52,834 $ 968.93 2012 $0 $71,149 $71,149 $51,295 $ 879.35 2011 $0 $94,730 $94,730 $49,801 $ 855.75 2010 $0 $94,730 $94,730 $48,350 $ 831.50 2009 $0 $94,730 $94,730 $46,942 $ 810.71 2008 $0 $94,730 $94,730 $45,575 $ 797.25 2007 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ 0.00 Current Year Assessed Value $71,003 Less Exemption Amount *N/A Taxable Value $71,003 * Frozen Assessed Value Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Tax Code Area & Taxing Districts Tax Code Area (Levy Code) for current tax year 01900 Taxing Districts for TCA 01900 City of Springfield Lane Community College Lane County Lane Education Service District Springfield Economic Development Agency Springfield School District 19 Upper Willamette Soil & Water Willamalane Park & Recreation District **NOTE Lane County Assessment and Taxation Tax Code Area & Taxing Districts reflect the current certified year. The Billing Rate Document may still reference the prior year’s rates and details until we receive the current report from Lane County. Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Sales & Ownership Changes No sales or ownership change data available. Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Log Off Generated by First American Title Ins. Company on May 30, 2024 at 1:46pm using Regional Land Information Database, https://www.rlid.org/ Customer Service Department 503.219.8746 cs.oregon@firstam.com Date: 05/30/2024 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner:Clearwire Us LLC Parcel #:5604013 CoOwner:Ref Parcel #: Site:2656 Olympic St Springfield OR 97477 TRS: Mail:4400 Carillon Point Kirkland WA 98033 County:Lane PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Map Grid: Census Tract:Block: Neighborhood: School Dist: Impr Type: Subdiv/Plat: Land Use: Std Land Use: Zoning: Lat/Lon:0 / 0 Watershed: Legal:Map Lot: , TRS: T R S Q ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION Market Land:$0.00 Market Impr:$0.00 Market Total:$0.00 (0) % Improved:0.00% Assessed Total:$0.00 (0) Levy Code: Tax:$0.00 (0) Millage Rate:0.0000 Exemption: Exemption Type: PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms: Total SqFt: Year Built: Baths, Total: First Floor: Eff Year Built: Baths, Full: Second Floor: Lot Size Ac: Baths, Half: Basement Fin: Lot Size SF: Total Units: Basement Unfin: Lot Width: # Stories: Basement Total: Lot Depth: # Fireplaces: Attic Fin: Roof Material: Cooling:Attic Unfin: Roof Shape: Heating:Attic Total: Ext Walls: Building Style:Garage: Const Type: SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Owner Date Doc #Sale Price Deed Type Loan Amt Loan Type Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and its customers make no representations, warranties or conditions, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Customer Service Department 503.219.8746 cs.oregon@firstam.com Date: 05/30/2024 OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Owner:Springfield, Mini Storage Parcel #:5693089 CoOwner:Ref Parcel #: Site:2656 Olympic St Springfield OR 97477 TRS: Mail:8400 E Prentice Ave 9th Fl Greenwood Village CO 80111 County:Lane PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Map Grid: Census Tract:Block: Neighborhood: School Dist: Impr Type: Subdiv/Plat: Land Use: Std Land Use: Zoning: Lat/Lon:0 / 0 Watershed: Legal:Map Lot: , TRS: T R S Q ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION Market Land:$0.00 Market Impr:$0.00 Market Total:$778.00 (2023) % Improved:0.00% Assessed Total:$778.00 (2023) Levy Code:01900 Tax:$0.00 (2023) Millage Rate:18.3252 Exemption: Exemption Type: PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms: Total SqFt: Year Built: Baths, Total: First Floor: Eff Year Built: Baths, Full: Second Floor: Lot Size Ac: Baths, Half: Basement Fin: Lot Size SF: Total Units: Basement Unfin: Lot Width: # Stories: Basement Total: Lot Depth: # Fireplaces: Attic Fin: Roof Material: Cooling:Attic Unfin: Roof Shape: Heating:Attic Total: Ext Walls: Building Style:Garage: Const Type: SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Owner Date Doc #Sale Price Deed Type Loan Amt Loan Type Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and its customers make no representations, warranties or conditions, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Site Address N/A Map & Taxlot#data not available SIC N/A Tax Account#5693089 Property Owner 1 Springfield Mini Storage 8400 E Prentice Ave 9th Fl Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Tax account acreage data not available Mapped taxlot acreage† data not available † Mapped Taxlot Acreage is the estimated size of a taxlot as derived from the county GIS taxlot layer, and is not to be used for legal purposes. Related Accts 1459724 Maps Business Information RLID does not contain any business data for this address Improvements No assessor photos, assessor sketches or building characteristic information is available for this tax account. Site Address Information No site address associated with this tax account number General Taxlot Characteristics Personal property account - no taxlot data Service Providers Personal property account - no taxlot data Environmental Data Personal property account - no taxlot data Schools Personal property account - no taxlot data Political Districts Personal property account - no taxlot data Census Information Census data have been removed from this report. To obtain Census data, please visit www.census.gov. For questions or concerns, please contact support@rlid.org. Liens None. RLID displays liens issued by Cottage Grove, Florence, and Springfield Utility Board. Additional liens can be found in Deeds and Records. Building Permits Please check the State of Oregon ePermitting System. Land Use Applications RLID does not contain any landuse application data for this jurisdiction Petitions RLID does not contain any petition data for this jurisdiction Tax Statements & Tax Receipts Account#: 5693089 View tax statement(s) for: 2023 2022 Tax Receipts Receipt Date Amount Received Tax Discount Interest Applied Amount $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Owner/Taxpayer Owners Owner Address City/State/Zip Springfield Mini Storage 8400 E Prentice Ave 9th Fl Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Taxpayer Party Name Address City/State/Zip Springfield Mini Storage 8400 E Prentice Ave 9th Fl Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Account Status Status Active Account Current Tax Year Related Accts 1459724 Account Status none Remarks none Special Assessment Program N/A Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation General Tax Account Information Tax Account Acreage data not available Fire Acres N/A Property Class N/A Statistical Class N/A Neighborhood data not available Category Personal Property Account Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Township-Range-Section / Subdivision Data Subdivision Type N/A Subdivision Name N/A Subdivision Number N/A Phase N/A Lot/Tract/Unit #N/A Recording Number N/A Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Property Values & Taxes The values shown are the values certified in October unless a value change has been processed on the property. Value changes typically occur as a result of appeals, clerical errors and omitted property. The tax shown is the amount certified in October. This is the full amount of tax for the year indicated and does not include any discounts offered, payments made, interest owing or previous years owing. It also does not reflect any value changes. Real Market Value (RMV)Total Assessed Value Tax Year Land Improvement Total 2023 $0 $0 $778 $778 $ 0.00 2022 $0 $0 $728 $728 $ 0.00 2021 $0 $0 $623 $623 $ 0.00 2020 $0 $0 $635 $635 $ 0.00 2019 $0 $0 $655 $655 $ 0.00 2018 $0 $0 $674 $674 $ 0.00 2017 $0 $0 $712 $712 $ 0.00 2016 $0 $0 $784 $784 $ 0.00 2015 $0 $0 $893 $893 $ 0.00 Current Year Assessed Value $778 Less Exemption Amount *N/A Taxable Value $778 * Frozen Assessed Value Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Tax Code Area & Taxing Districts Tax Code Area (Levy Code) for current tax year 01900 Taxing Districts for TCA 01900 City of Springfield Lane Community College Lane County Lane Education Service District Springfield Economic Development Agency Springfield School District 19 Upper Willamette Soil & Water Willamalane Park & Recreation District **NOTE Lane County Assessment and Taxation Tax Code Area & Taxing Districts reflect the current certified year. The Billing Rate Document may still reference the prior year’s rates and details until we receive the current report from Lane County. Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Sales & Ownership Changes No sales or ownership change data available. Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Log Off Generated by First American Title Ins. Company on May 30, 2024 at 1:47pm using Regional Land Information Database, https://www.rlid.org/ Assessor Map Parcel ID: 1459724 Site Address: 2656 Olympic St Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and its customers make no representations, warranties or conditions, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Aerial Map Parcel ID: 1459724 Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and its customers make no representations, warranties or conditions, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Site Address 2656 Olympic St Springfield, OR 97477-3488 Map & Taxlot#17-03-25-41-00102 SIC N/A Tax Account#1459724 Property Owner 1 Northwest Self Storage 14855 SE 82nd Dr Clackamas, OR 97015 Tax account acreage 2.14 Mapped taxlot acreage† 2.13 † Mapped Taxlot Acreage is the estimated size of a taxlot as derived from the county GIS taxlot layer, and is not to be used for legal purposes. Related Accts 1805181 5693089 Maps Map & Taxlot # 17-03-25-41-00102 Business Information Business Profile Summary Business Name Northwest Self Storage Address 2656 Olympic St Springfield, OR 97477-3488 Contact Information Toll-free Phone Phone (541) 275-9892 Fax (541) 746-6509 Web Nwselfstorage.Com SIC and NAICS NAICS Code 531130 NAICS Description Lessors Of Miniwarehouses And Self-Storage Units Primary SIC Code 422503 Primary SIC Description Storage-Household & Commercial Corporate Information Location Employment Size 1 to 4 (range) | 1 (actual) Location Sales Volume Less Than $500,000 (range) | 90000 (actual) Source: infoGroup/Government Division, 5711 S 86th Circle, Omaha, NE 68127, www.infoUSAgov.com Improvements Photos & Sketches for Tax Account Building Part: C01 Floor Number 1 Occupancy Description Mini-Warehouse Use Description Springfield Mini Storage Year Built 1989 Effective Year Built 1989 Grade 4 Wall Height Ft 8 Sq Ft 43300 Fireproof Steel Sq Ft 0 Reinforced Concrete Sq Ft 0 Fire Resistant Sq Ft 0 Wood Joist Sq Ft 43300 Pole Frame Sq Ft 0 Pre-engineered Steel Sq Ft 0 Building Part: C01 Floor Number 2 Sq Ft 840 Occupancy Description Multiple Res Use Description Springfield Mini Storage Year Built 1989 Effective Year Built 1989 Grade 4 Wall Height Ft 8 Fireproof Steel Sq Ft 0 Reinforced Concrete Sq Ft 0 Fire Resistant Sq Ft 0 Wood Joist Sq Ft 840 Pole Frame Sq Ft 0 Pre-engineered Steel Sq Ft 0 Commercial Appraisal Card 1703254100102 Site Address Information 2656 Olympic St Springfield, OR 97477-3488 House #2656 Suffix N/A Pre-directional N/A Street Name Olympic Street Type St Unit type / #N/A Mail City Springfield State OR Zip Code 97477 Zip + 4 3488 Land Use 6375 Commercial Warehousing & Storage USPS Carrier Route N/A General Taxlot Characteristics Geographic Coordinates X 4267286 Y 881965 (State Plane X,Y) Latitude 44.0599 Longitude -122.9881 Zoning Zoning Jurisdiction Springfield Springfield Parent Zone LMI Light Medium Industrial Land Use General Land Use Code Description data not available data not available Detailed Land Use Code Description data not available data not available Taxlot Characteristics Incorporated City Limits Springfield Urban Growth Boundary Springfield Year Annexed 1969 Annexation #N/A Approximate Taxlot Acreage 2.13 Approx Taxlot Sq Footage 92,783 Plan Designation Light Medium Industrial Eugene Neighborhood N/A Metro Area Nodal Dev Area No Septic data not available Well data not available Landscaping Quality data not available Historic Property Name N/A City Historic Landmark?No National Historical Register?No Service Providers Fire Protection Provider Eugene Springfield Fire Ambulance Provider Eugene Springfield Fire Ambulance District EC Ambulance Service Area East/Central LTD Service Area?Yes LTD Ride Source?Yes Environmental Data FEMA Flood Hazard Zone Code Description X Areas determined to be outside of 500-year flood. FIRM Map Number 41039C1161F Community Number 039C Post-FIRM Date data not available Panel Printed?Yes Soils Soil Map Unit#Soil Type Description % of Taxlot Ag Class Hydric % 76 Malabon-Urban Land Complex 72%1 0 101 Oxley-Urban Land Complex 23%3 5 119 Salem-Urban Land Complex 5%2 0 Schools Code Name School District 19 Springfield Elementary School 550 Maple Middle School 542 Briggs High School 560 Springfield Political Districts Election Precinct 2456 City Council Ward S4 City Councilor Beth Blackwell County Commissioner District 2 (Springfield) County Commissioner David Loveall EWEB Commissioner N/A LCC Board Zone 3 State Representative District 7 State Representative John Lively State Senate District 4 State Senator Floyd Prozanski Emerald PUD Board Zone N/A Heceta PUD Board Zone N/A Central Lincoln PUD Board Zone N/A Soil Water Cons. Dist/Zone Upper Willamette / 2 Creswell Water Control District No Lane ESD Board Zone 3 Census Information Census data have been removed from this report. To obtain Census data, please visit www.census.gov. For questions or concerns, please contact support@rlid.org. Liens None. RLID displays liens issued by Cottage Grove, Florence, and Springfield Utility Board. Additional liens can be found in Deeds and Records. Building Permits Please check the State of Oregon ePermitting System. Land Use Applications RLID does not contain any landuse application data for this jurisdiction Petitions RLID does not contain any petition data for this jurisdiction Tax Statements & Tax Receipts Account#: 1459724 View tax statement(s) for: 2023 2022 Tax Receipts Receipt Date Amount Received Tax Discount Interest Applied Amount 11/08/2023 $32,421.16 $32,421.16 $1,002.72 $0.00 $33,423.88 11/15/2022 $31,361.09 $31,361.09 $969.93 $0.00 $32,331.02 11/09/2021 $30,798.38 $30,798.38 $952.53 $0.00 $31,750.91 11/12/2020 $29,899.09 $29,899.09 $924.71 $0.00 $30,823.80 11/13/2019 $28,999.95 $28,999.95 $896.91 $0.00 $29,896.86 Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Owner/Taxpayer Owners Owner Address City/State/Zip Northwest Self Storage 14855 SE 82nd Dr Clackamas, OR 97015 Taxpayer Party Name Address City/State/Zip Northwest Self Storage 14855 SE 82nd Dr Clackamas, OR 97015 Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Account Status Status Active Account Current Tax Year Related Accts 1805181 5693089 Account Status none Remarks none Special Assessment Program N/A Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation General Tax Account Information Tax Account Acreage 2.14 Fire Acres N/A Property Class 231 - Commercial, industrial zone, improved Statistical Class 706 - Mini warehouse Neighborhood 90201 - Springfield Industrial Category Land and Improvements Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Township-Range-Section / Subdivision Data Subdivision Type N/A Subdivision Name N/A Subdivision Number N/A Phase N/A Lot/Tract/Unit #TL 00102 Recording Number N/A Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Property Values & Taxes The values shown are the values certified in October unless a value change has been processed on the property. Value changes typically occur as a result of appeals, clerical errors and omitted property. The tax shown is the amount certified in October. This is the full amount of tax for the year indicated and does not include any discounts offered, payments made, interest owing or previous years owing. It also does not reflect any value changes. Real Market Value (RMV)Total Assessed Value Tax Year Land Improvement Total 2023 $1,092,133 $4,514,604 $5,606,737 $1,823,930 $33,423.88 2022 $1,213,483 $5,016,229 $6,229,712 $1,770,806 $32,331.02 2021 $879,336 $3,634,950 $4,514,286 $1,719,230 $31,750.91 2020 $814,201 $3,365,696 $4,179,897 $1,669,156 $30,823.80 2019 $768,115 $3,175,186 $3,943,301 $1,620,540 $29,896.86 2018 $745,744 $3,082,707 $3,828,451 $1,573,340 $28,182.14 2017 $494,083 $2,261,346 $2,755,429 $1,527,515 $27,099.03 2016 $475,081 $2,174,372 $2,649,453 $1,483,024 $26,529.67 2015 $484,777 $2,218,749 $2,703,526 $1,439,829 $25,773.37 2014 $484,777 $2,218,749 $2,703,526 $1,397,892 $25,384.32 2013 $484,777 $2,218,749 $2,703,526 $1,357,177 $24,889.54 2012 $484,777 $2,218,749 $2,703,526 $1,317,648 $22,588.31 2011 $484,777 $2,411,685 $2,896,462 $1,279,270 $21,982.21 2010 $603,257 $2,331,990 $2,935,247 $1,242,010 $21,359.59 2009 $628,394 $2,429,160 $3,057,554 $1,205,835 $20,825.37 2008 $610,092 $2,504,290 $3,114,382 $1,170,714 $20,479.42 2007 $554,630 $2,431,350 $2,985,980 $1,136,616 $18,536.50 2006 $410,838 $2,132,760 $2,543,598 $1,103,511 $18,013.05 2005 $360,385 $1,870,845 $2,231,230 $1,071,370 $17,616.22 2004 $299,012 $2,151,270 $2,450,282 $1,040,165 $17,278.39 2003 $276,863 $1,991,920 $2,268,783 $1,009,869 $16,782.41 2002 $279,660 $2,012,040 $2,291,700 $980,455 $15,332.85 2001 $288,310 $2,074,270 $2,362,580 $951,898 $15,041.61 2000 $184,890 $2,177,690 $2,362,580 $924,173 $14,678.18 1999 $156,690 $1,845,500 $2,002,190 $897,255 $14,838.71 1998 $150,660 $1,864,140 $2,014,800 $871,121 $14,424.90 1997 $146,270 $1,809,840 $1,956,110 $845,749 $14,371.05 1996 $139,300 $1,560,210 $1,699,510 $1,699,510 $26,495.37 1995 $156,510 $863,010 $1,019,520 $1,019,520 $16,002.90 Current Year Assessed Value $1,823,930 Less Exemption Amount *N/A Taxable Value $1,823,930 * Frozen Assessed Value Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Tax Code Area & Taxing Districts Tax Code Area (Levy Code) for current tax year 01900 Taxing Districts for TCA 01900 City of Springfield Lane Community College Lane County Lane Education Service District Springfield Economic Development Agency Springfield School District 19 Upper Willamette Soil & Water Willamalane Park & Recreation District **NOTE Lane County Assessment and Taxation Tax Code Area & Taxing Districts reflect the current certified year. The Billing Rate Document may still reference the prior year’s rates and details until we receive the current report from Lane County. Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Sales & Ownership Changes Sale Date Sale Price Doc #Image Analysis Code Multiple Accts?Grantor(s)Grantee(s) 10/30/2012 $0 2012-56628 8 No Warren Wimberly M & Howard Family TR Springfield Mini Storage LLC 06/15/2012 $0 2012-30127 8 No Howard Kevin Warren Wimberly M 08/01/2000 $0 2000-65506 6 Yes Howard Kevin Howard Kevin 08/01/2000 $0 2000-52014 6 No Warren Cameron J Estate of Warren Wimberly M 05/04/1999 $0 1999-41351 2 No General American Life Ins Co Heirs of Warren Cameron J, Howard K 05/03/1995 $0 1995-25999 6 data not available Howard, Bobette data not available 07/13/1992 $0 1992-44698 6 data not available Howard, Kevin data not available 01/01/1991 $0 1991-21896 6 data not available Howard, Kevin data not available Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation Log Off Generated by First American Title Ins. Company on May 30, 2024 at 1:49pm using Regional Land Information Database, https://www.rlid.org/ TITLE SHEETSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESSLABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SETP R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U ET1P R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EEG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWKFA # / SITE ID:10127841 / EG022656 OLYMPIC AVE.SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478ERICSSONPROJECT INFORMATIONSITE NAME:EG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWKFA# / SITE ID:10127841 / EG02PROJECT TYPE:2024 5G NR RADIOPACE / PTN:MRWOR073320 / 3898A19ZSMSTRUCTURE TYPE:COLLOCATION 150'-0" MONOPOLEAERIAL PHOTOLOCATION MAPSITE ID: EG02SITE ID: EG02SITE REFERENCE PHOTOSHEETSHEET DESCRIPTIONREVDRIVING DIRECTIONSDO NOT SCALE DRAWINGSONE CALLCODE COMPLIANCESCOPE OF WORKDRAWING INDEXPROJECT TEAMCODE COMPLIANCE···························· GENERAL NOTESSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESSLABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SETP R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EGN1P R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EEG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWKFA # / SITE ID:10127841 / EG022656 OLYMPIC AVE.SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478ERICSSONGENERAL NOTESELECTRICIAL INSTALLATION NOTESGROUNDING NOTESABBREVIATIONS X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XEXISTING SITEPLANSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESSLABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SETP R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EA1P R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EEG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWKFA # / SITE ID:10127841 / EG022656 OLYMPIC AVE.SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478ERICSSONSCALE:1EXISTING SITE PLAN#KTRUE NORTHSITE PLAN DISCLAIMERAKCDEHIJFGLMNOPQB EQUIPMENTROOM PLANSSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESSLABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SETP R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EA2P R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EEG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWKFA # / SITE ID:10127841 / EG022656 OLYMPIC AVE.SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478ERICSSONSCALE:1EXISTING EQUIPMENT ROOM PLAN##ESCALE:2PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ROOM PLANTRUE NORTHTRUE NORTHSITE PLAN DISCLAIMERBCDFIKEFFLHHJGEABCDIKELHHFFFJGA134MM8967NNO52 MONOPOLEELEVATIONSSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESSLABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SETP R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EA3P R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EEG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWKFA # / SITE ID:10127841 / EG022656 OLYMPIC AVE.SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478ERICSSONSCALE:1EXISTING ELEVATION#STRUCTURE NOTES:SCALE:2PROPOSED ELEVATION9ALOADING NOTES:N.T.S.N.T.S.12345671112131516171823222021# ANTENNA PLANS& SCHEDULESHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESSLABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SETP R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EA4P R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EEG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWKFA # / SITE ID:10127841 / EG022656 OLYMPIC AVE.SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478ERICSSONSCALE:3FINAL EQUIPMENT SCHEDULEN.T.S.SCALE:1EXISTING ANTENNA PLANN.T.S.SCALE:2PROPOSED ANTENNA PLANTRUE NORTHTRUE NORTH#N.T.S.12345613111214891071516171819 SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESSLABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SETP R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EA5P R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EEG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWKFA # / SITE ID:10127841 / EG022656 OLYMPIC AVE.SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478ERICSSONSCALE:1RADIO SPECIFICATIONSN.T.S.ERICSSON RRUS 4415ERICSSONSCALE:2RADIO SPECIFICATIONSN.T.S.ERICSSON 4478 RRHEQUIPMENTSPECIFICATIONSERICSSON 4890 RRHERICSSON 4490 RRHSCALE:3RADIO SPECIFICATIONSN.T.S.SCALE:4RADIO SPECIFICATIONSN.T.S. SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESSLABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SETP R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EA6P R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EEG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWKFA # / SITE ID:10127841 / EG022656 OLYMPIC AVE.SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478ERICSSONSCALE:1ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONSN.T.S.EQUIPMENTSPECIFICATIONSERICSSON - AIR 6419SCALE:2SURGE PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONSRAYCAP DC9-48-60-24-8C-EV EQUIPMENTSPECIFICATIONSSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESSLABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SETP R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EA7P R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EEG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWKFA # / SITE ID:10127841 / EG022656 OLYMPIC AVE.SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478ERICSSONSCALE:1ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONSN.T.S.ACE XXQLH-654L8H6-IVTKMW EPBQ-654L8H8-L2SCALE:2ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONSN.T.S. SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESSLABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SETP R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EA8P R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EEG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWKFA # / SITE ID:10127841 / EG022656 OLYMPIC AVE.SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478ERICSSONPLUMBINGDIAGRAMSCALE:1PLUMBING DIAGRAMN.T.S. SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERREVISIONSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESSLABELED AS CONSTRUCTION SETP R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EG1P R E L I M I N A R Y I S S U EEG02 HWY 126 AND MOHAWKFA # / SITE ID:10127841 / EG022656 OLYMPIC AVE.SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478ERICSSONGROUNDINGDETAILSSCALE:1TYPICAL ANTENNA GROUNDING DIAGRAMN.T.S.SCALE:2CABLE GROUND KIT CONNECTION DETAILN.T.S.SCALE:3TOWER GROUND BAR DETAILN.T.S.SCALE:4GROUND BAR DETAILN.T.S.SCALE:5RRU GROUNDING CONNECTION DETAILN.T.S.SCALE:6ANTENNA GROUNDING CONNECTION DETAILN.T.S.GROUND KIT NOTESGROUND KIT NOTES