HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024 05 07 Planning Commission Agenda PH1
P Planning Commission
Agenda
City Hall
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
541.726.3610
Come in person or join by Zoom as an Attendee:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88505682487
Or Telephone:
+1 971 247 1195 US (Portland)
833 928 4608 US Toll Free
Webinar ID: 885 0568 2487
All proceedings before the Planning Commission are recorded.
To view agenda packet materials or view a recording after the meeting, go to
SpringfieldOregonSpeaks.org
May 7th, 2024
7:00 p.m. Regular Session
Council Chambers (City Hall) & via Zoom
Council Chambers is ADA accessible. For meetings in the Council Meeting Room, a “Personal PA
Receiver” for the hearing impaired is available, as well as an Induction Loop for the benefit of hearing
aid users.
CALL TO ORDER
ATTENDANCE Chair Rhoads-Dey _____, Vice Chair Buck _____, Salazar_____,
Thompson_____, Schmunk_____, Stout_____, and Webber_____.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIENCE
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
• April 2nd, 2024 Joint Springfield & Lane County Session
• April 2nd, 2024
• April 16th, 2024
BUSINESS FROM THE AUDIENCE
Comprehensive Planning Manager:
Sandy Belson 541.736.7135
Administrative Specialist:
Sarah Weaver 541.726.3653
City Attorney’s Office:
Kristina Kraaz 541.744.4061
Planning Commissioners:
Isaac Rhoads-Dey, Chair
Andrew Buck, Vice-Chair
Matt Salazar
Seth Thompson
Steven Schmunk
Alan Stout
Bruce Webber
2
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1) Major Variance for Proposed Dispensary at 1853 2nd Street
Staff: Tom Sievers, Senior Planner
20 Minutes
2) Discretionary Use for Short Term Rental at 921 S. 67th Street
Staff: Andy Limbird, Senior Planner
20 Minutes
CONDUCT OF QUASI-JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING
• Staff explanation of quasi-judicial hearing process (ORS 197.763 and
Springfield Development Code 5.1.500)
• Chair opens the public hearing
• Commission members declaration of conflicts of interest, bias, or “ex-parte” contact
• Any challenges to the impartiality of the Commissioners or objection to the jurisdiction of the
Commission to hear the matter
• Staff report
• Testimony from the applicant
• Testimony in support of the application
• Testimony neither in support of nor opposed to the application
• Testimony opposed to the application
• Rebuttal from the applicant
• Staff comment
• Planning Commission questions to staff or public
• Close or continue public hearing; close or extend written record
(continuance or extension by motion)
• Planning Commission Deliberations – discussion of the proposal
including testimony and evidence addressing the applicable approval criteria
• Motion to approve as presented, approve with modifications, or deny the application based on the
Commissions’ findings of fact contained in the staff report, oral and written testimony, and other
evidence submitted into the record
REPORT ON COUNCIL ACTION
BUSINESS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION
BUSINESS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ADJOURNMENT