HomeMy WebLinkAboutMeeting Packet Planner 5/8/2024DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING FORM
APPLICANT: Allie Camp, City of Springfield
MEETING DATE/TIME: Thursday, May 30, 2024 1:30 p.m.
PLACE: DPW Conference Room 615/616 and Virtual via Zoom
CONTACT PERSON: Tom Sievers 726-2333
Current Planning Staff: L Miller, A Limbird, M Rust, K Notary, T Sievers
Stan Petroff, AIC City Engineer – DPW
Kristi Krueger, AIC Managing Civil Engineer – DPW
Ken Vogeney, Emergency Manager – DPW
Clayton McEachern, Civil Engineer, Development & Public Works
Matt Stouder, Environmental Services Div. Manager/MWMC General Manager
Kristi Krueger, Capital Engineering Manager, Development & Public Works
Michael Liebler, Transportation Planning, Civil Engineer, Development & Public Works
Gilbert Gordon, Deputy Fire Marshall 2, Fire & Life Safety Department
Ben Gibson, Maintenance Supervisor, Development & Public Works
Eric Adams, Planning, Willamalane Park and Recreation District
Ladd Boyce, Keoki Lapina, Springfield Utility Board (Water)
Greg Miller, Springfield Utility Board (Water)
Sanjeev King, Nick Amann, Springfield Utility Board (Electric)
Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board (DWP)
Thomas Jeffreys, (EPUD) Emerald Peoples Utility District
Michael Wargo, Willamalane Park and Recreation District
Matt Caswell, Planning & Development Manager, ODOT, State Highway Division
(odotr2planmgr@odot.state.or.us)
Brad Rudler, (Electric) Eugene Water and Electric Board
Tyler Lindley, Eugene Water and Electric Board
Wallace McCullough, (Water), Eugene Water and Electric Board
Brett Yancey, Chief Operations Officer; Springfield Public Schools
Chris Reiersgaard, Asst. Director of Facilities & Operations; Springfield Public Schools
Safe Routes to School, Springfield Public Schools
Chris Carpenter, DPW Building Official
Andrew Shearer, Police Chief, Police Department
Tom Schwetz, LTD, Planning and Development Director
Luke Pilon, CenturyLink
Jeff Paschall, Community Development Manager – DPW
Jeremy Sherer, City Surveyor – DPW
Meghan Murphy, Program Coordinator, Environmental Services
Sasha Vartanian, Lane County Transportation - send to
LCPWTPReferrals@lanecounty.gov ONLY
Marie Longworth, Central Lane Communications 911
Monte Brown, Northwest Natural Gas
Jason McDonald, Comcast Cable
Jamie Porter, Rainbow Water District
Kristina Kraaz, City Attorney (Mary Bridget Smith upon specific request)
Allie Camp, Economic Development
Sarah Weaver, Administrative Specialist (DIM Annexations)
Please mark who you would like to attend this meeting and return form and
file to Shannon. Thanks!
Revised: 01/08/2024
DEVELOPMENT
INITIATION MEETING
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
SPRINGFIELD CITY HALL
225 FIFTH STREET
DPW Conference Room 615/616 + Zoom
Meeting Date: Thursday, May 30, 2024 1:30 – 2:30
1. DEVELOPMENT INITIATION MTG #811-24-000119-PRE 811-23-000239-PROJ City of
Springfield
Assessor’s Map & TL: various
Address: various
Existing Use: Glenwood Riverfront
Applicant has submitted proposal for annexation 35 tax lots, approximately 28 acres
Planner: Tom Sievers
The Development Issues Meeting informational packet for this meeting is available on-line for
you to review or print out @ Laserfiche website: www.springfield-or.gov/weblink8/browse.aspx
SITE
VICINITY MAP
811-24-000119-PRE Development Initiation Meeting
Map & TL: Various
Various Addresses
City of Springfield, Allie Camp
Revised 04/17/2023 slm 6 of 16
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Annexation Development Initiation Meeting (DIM)
Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section)
Prospective
Applicant Name: Phone:
Company:
Address: E-mail:
Prospective
Applicant’s Rep.: Phone:
Company:
Address: E-mail:
Property Owner: Phone:
Company:
Address: E-mail:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: TAX LOT NO(S):
Property Address:
Size of Property: Acres Square Feet
Description of
Proposal:
If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Existing Use: Proposed Use:
City Zoning: Metro Designation: Population:
Prospective
Applicant: Date:
Signature
Print
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: complete this section)
Case No.: Date: Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $0 Postage Fee: $0
TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER:
2
Allie Camp 541-726-3700
225 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477
acamp@springfield-or.go
Lorri Nelson 541-485-1003
1203 Willamette Street, Suite 210, Eugene, OR 97401 lorri@rowellbrokaw.com
Owners same as Applicants. See Applicant List.
Two Maps. See List. 35 tax lots. See Tax Lot Inventory
Some are addressed, some are not. See Tax Lot Inventory.
✔
GRMU / GCMU RMU / CMU None
City of Springfield
Rowell Brokaw Architects
28.80
Property owner initiated annexation request
Various - Residential, Commercial, Vacant Residential/Commercial Mix
2 May 2024
Allie Camp
May 2, 2024
GLENWOOD RIVERFRONT MASTER PLAN
Annexation Development Initiation Meeting
(Map 17-03-34-41, Tax Lots 100-500, 700-1000, 1300 and 1500; and Map 17-03-34-42, Tax Lots 100-
1000 and 1200-2100)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LIST OF QUESTIONS
In support of the applicant’s request for a Development Initiation Meeting regarding the submittal of an
Annexation application regarding the property included in the Glenwood Riverfront Master Plan, the
project description and list of questions herein has been generated to provide an explanation of the
project and solicit information that will assist the applicant in preparing the annexation application. We ask
for city review and response to the information and questions presented herein. In advance, the applicant
and its development team thank staff for their assistance.
I. SUBJECT PROPERTY
The property subject to the Master
Plan is comprised of 41 tax lots
totaling just over 30 acres. It is
located in the Glenwood
neighborhood of Springfield at the
east end of what the Glenwood
Refinement Plan refers to as the
Franklin Riverfront. Abutting the
property to the south is Franklin
Blvd, to the west adjacent private
property and to the north and east
the Willamette River.
The Master Plan site contains
areas that are undeveloped and
vacant, previously developed but
currently vacant, and currently
developed and occupied. Existing
uses are a mix of commercial and
single-family residential. Plan and
zone designations include
Commercial Mixed-Use in the
eastern portion and Residential
Mixed-Use in the western portion.
Subject Property
Regional Land Information Database
2023
In specific regard to annexation, six of the 41 tax lots (the tax lots owned by Homes for Good, Lane
County’s housing agency – Map 17-03-34-41, Lots 1100, 1400, and 1700-2000) have been
previously annexed. The remaining 35 tax lots (owned by the City of Springfield, the Springfield
Economic Development Agency, Too Blue LLC, 4340 LLC, and Roth & Roth LLC – Map 17-03-34-41,
Lots 100-500, 700-1000, 1300 and 1500; and Map 17-03-34-42, Tax Lots 100-1000 and 1200-2100)
abutting the Homes for Good property to the north, east and west and Franklin Blvd to the south
remain to be annexed. Those 35 lots are then the subject of this annexation application. (Detailed
planning, zoning and ownership data is included herein as an attachment to the DIM application
form.)
Glenwood Riverfront Master Plan Page 2 of 6
Annexation – Development Initiation Meeting – Project Description and List of Questions
May 2, 2024
The Satre Group • 375 West 4th Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 • (541) 686-4540 • www.satregroup.com
II. PROCESS TO DATE
With regard to the master plan itself, relevant data in regard to applicable long-range plans and
development code has been collected and analyzed, initial development scenarios have been
generated, prospective land use applications have been outlined, numerous discussion sessions
have been held with city staff and property owners, and a Master Plan Development Initiation Meeting
has occurred.
III. NEXT STEP – ANNEXATION
The results of the Master Plan Development Initiation Meeting concluded that the Master Plan is
heading in the right direction and confirmed that a select set of land use decision processes needed
to occur prior to the Master Plan application itself. These are Annexation, Zoning Map Amendment,
and Development Code Amendment, with the Annexation occurring first. Given that, here is the first
step in the annexation process – an Annexation Development Initiation Meeting.
IV. ANNEXATION DIM QUESTIONS
1. Annexation Criteria (SDC 5.7.140).
The applicant’s understanding of applicable criteria and current thoughts as material to address in
the annexation application’s written statement is as follows.
(A) The affected territory proposed to be annexed is within the City’s urban growth boundary; and
is:
(1) Contiguous to the city limits; or
(2) Separated from the City only by a public right-of-way or a stream, lake, or other body of
water.
Response: The applicant will cite that the first criterion (A)(1) applies in this instance.
(B) The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in any
applicable refinement plans or Plan Districts;
Response: The applicant will identify and provide information documenting consistency with
known policies applicable to this annexation application. Plans include the Metro Plan,
Springfield Comprehensive Plan, Glenwood Refinement Plan, and Glenwood Riverfront
Mixed-Use Plan District. Policies applicable to annexation are as follows:
Metro Plan Policies:
• The Metro Plan does not contain any policies applicable to annexation in Springfield.
o As of 2011, with the adoption of the Springfield 2030 Refinement Plan Residential
Land Use and Housing Element, Ordinance No. 6268, Metro Plan Sub-chapter III-A,
Residential Land Use and Housing Element, and its policies therein, in regard to
Statewide Planning Goal 10, Housing, no longer applies to Springfield.
o As of 2016, with the adoption of the Springfield 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Urbanization Element, Springfield Ordinance No. 6361, and Lane County Ordinance
No. PA 1304, Metro Plan Sub-chapter’s II-C, Growth Management, II-E, Urban and
Urbanizable Land, and policies therein, in regard to Statewide Planning Goal 14,
Urbanization, and sub-chapter III-B, Economic Element, in regard to Statewide
Planning Goal 9, Economic Development, no longer apply to Springfield.
Springfield Comprehensive Plan Policies:
• The Springfield Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element contains a number of policies
applicable to annexation.
Glenwood Riverfront Master Plan Page 3 of 6
Annexation – Development Initiation Meeting – Project Description and List of Questions
May 2, 2024
The Satre Group • 375 West 4th Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 • (541) 686-4540 • www.satregroup.com
o Policy 29: Annexation shall continue to be a prerequisite for urban development and
the delivery of City services in accordance with the Springfield Comprehensive Plan
and Springfield Development Code.
o Policy 30: Unincorporated land within the Springfield UGB may be developed with
permitted uses at maximum density only upon annexation to the City when it is found
that key urban facilities and services can be provided to the area to be annexed in an
orderly and efficient manner. Provision of these services to the area proposed for
annexation is consistent with the timing and location for such extension, where
applicable, in the City’s infrastructure plans — such as the Public Facilities and
Services Plan; the Springfield Transportation System Plan; the City’s Capital
Improvement Program; and the urbanization goals, policies and implementation
strategies of this Element — or a logical time within which to deliver these services
has been determined, based upon demonstrated need and budgetary priorities.
o Policy 31: For the purposes of land use planning and annexation approval, the
Springfield Comprehensive Plan defines key urban facilities and services as:
wastewater service; stormwater service; transportation; solid waste management;
water service; fire and emergency medical services; police protection; citywide park
and recreation programs; electric service; land use controls; communication facilities;
and public schools on a district- wide basis.
o Policy 32. Urban services provided by the City upon annexation to Springfield include
storm and sanitary sewer; water; transportation systems; police and fire protection;
planning, building, code enforcement and library services; and public infrastructure
maintenance of City-owned or operated facilities.
o Policy 34: When unincorporated territory within the UGB is provided with any new
urban service, that service shall be provided by one of the following methods in this
priority order:
(a) Annexation to City; or
(b) Contractual annexation agreements with City
o Policy 35. The City shall not extend water or wastewater service outside city limits to
serve a residence or business without first obtaining a valid annexation petition, a
consent to annex agreement, or when a health hazard abatement annexation is
required.
o Policy 46. Continue efforts to provide increased opportunities for public access to the
Willamette River Greenway and the McKenzie River through comprehensive
planning, development standards, annexation agreements, the land use permitting
process, and through partnerships with Willamalane, Springfield Utility Board, and
property owners.
Glenwood Refinement Plan Policies:
• The Glenwood Refinement Plan is organized into 10 chapters and includes what are
organized as Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Implementation Strategies. Policies and
Implementation Strategies can be found in Chapters 3-10. Overall, there are 94 policies,
seven of which are in regard to annexation. Of those, three relate to providing financial
incentives as funding becomes available and three are in regard to existing public safety
and services agreements. One is applicable to the annexation of property.
o Policy F.1.b. Provide for annexation of urbanizable land to occur in a manner
consistent with State law and the Metro Plan, as well as City annexation policies and
procedures.
Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District Policies:
• In the Glenwood Refinement Plan itself, there are three policies regarding the Glenwood
Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District. One of those, Policy A.2.a, directs the city to adopt
the Plan District. This was accomplished upon the adoption and incorporation of the Plan
Glenwood Riverfront Master Plan Page 4 of 6
Annexation – Development Initiation Meeting – Project Description and List of Questions
May 2, 2024
The Satre Group • 375 West 4th Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 • (541) 686-4540 • www.satregroup.com
District into the Springfield Development Code in 2014. The other two policies (Policy
B.5.a, and Policy D.1.e) relate to the development of parking standards. There are no
Plan District policies in the Glenwood Refinement Plan that are in regard to annexation.
• The Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use Plan District is codified in the Springfield
Development Code at SDC 3.4.200. There are no policies in SDC 3.4.200, but there is
one standard regarding annexation of the Franklin Riverfront.
o SDC 3.4.215(B) “All required applications in the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed-Use
Plan District shall be reviewed as specified in Chapter 5, including, but not limited to,
Annexations…”
(C) The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key urban
facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an orderly, efficient,
and timely manner; and
Response: It is the applicant’s understanding that key urban facilities and services are
defined in Springfield Comprehensive Plan Policy 31 and include: wastewater service;
stormwater service; transportation; solid waste management; water service; fire and
emergency medical services; police protection; citywide park and recreation programs;
electric service; land use controls; communication facilities; and public schools on a district-
wide basis. Therefore, the annexation application will need to provide documentation that
key urban facilities and services are, or can be, provided to the proposed annexation area.
This will include documenting consistency with the Public Facilities and Services Plan;
Springfield Transportation System Plan, Stormwater Master Plan and Wastewater Master
Plan; Springfield Utility Board water and electric service plans; and the Willamalane Park and
Recreation District Comprehensive Plan; as well as police, fire, education, solid waste, and
other listed urban services.
With this in mind, the applicant intends to generate the specified Public/Private Utility Plan
(SDC 5.7.125(B)(12)) utilizing the above cited plans addressing the above cited facilities and
services. It is currently contemplated that the applicant will generate an initial outline of the
Public/Private Utility Plan, and then, in coordination with the Annexation Agreement (see
below), will revise/finalize the Utility Plan to be included with the annexation application.
(D) Where applicable, fiscal impacts to the City have been mitigated through an Annexation
Agreement or other mechanism approved by the City Council.
Response: The Springfield Development Code at SDC 5.7.113—Annexation Definitions,
defines Annexation Agreement as follows:
“Annexation Agreement. A written agreement between the City and owners of land
requesting annexation that states the terms, conditions, and obligations of the parties to
mitigate fiscal and service impacts to the City associated with the annexation and future
development of the property. The agreement may be used to ensure annexation consistent
with the Metro Plan.”
In addressing this criterion, it is the applicant’s understanding that the City of Springfield will
work with property owners who are party to the annexation application to generate the
required Annexation Agreement. A draft of the Agreement will then be included in the
annexation application’s initial submittal for completeness check, with a final Agreement
included in the annexation application’s re-submittal for completeness determination and
application processing.
Question: Question 1 above addresses what the applicant understands are the applicable
criteria and what it believes should be the scope of a response. Can staff:
Glenwood Riverfront Master Plan Page 5 of 6
Annexation – Development Initiation Meeting – Project Description and List of Questions
May 2, 2024
The Satre Group • 375 West 4th Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 • (541) 686-4540 • www.satregroup.com
a. Confirm that the above criteria SDC 5.7.140(A) through (D) are the correct criteria?
b. Confirm that the above cited policies at (B) are policies to be addressed in the application and
that there are no others that have been overlooked?
c. Confirm that the scope of cited urban facilities and services is accurate, the list of cited plan
documents in (C) is complete, and that there are no facilities and services or plan documents
that have bene overlooked?
d. Confirm that the strategy cited above in (C) regarding the development of the Public/Private
Utility Plan and its coordination with the Annexation Agreement is the right approach?
e. Confirm the applicant’s understanding that the development of the Annexation Agreement
cited in (D) will be conducted by the city?
2. Processing Duration. (Refer to the enclosed Calendar.)
Generating and processing an annexation application in Springfield is clearly articulated at SDC
5.7.100) with the hearing and decision process outlined at SDC 5.1.600. With this as a
background, it is the applicant’s understanding that the following approximate timeframes can be
utilized when outlining an overall calendar timeframe to process an annexation application.
• Development Initiation Meeting from date of submittal – within 30 calendar days.
• Application Completeness Check from date of submittal – within 30 calendar days.
• Application Decision from re-submittal and application being deemed complete, including a
21-day allowance for appeals – no more than 120 calendar days.
• Decision in effect – 30 days from decision.
Question: The intent of Question 2 is to receive information from staff to assist the applicant in
constructing an overall approximate calendar for the annexation application. Can staff:
a. Confirm that the above approximate durations are a reasonable expectation?
b. Identify the approximate amount of time that the city may need in generating an Annexation
Agreement?
c. In order for the application to be deemed complete, how far along will the Annexation
Agreement need to be? In draft form (i.e., agreed upon but not yet fully executed)?
d. At what point in the process will the Annexation Agreement need to be executed?
3. Processing Overlap. (Refer to the enclosed Calendar.)
In support of the emerging Master Plan, in addition to the Annexation application, two additional
land use decisions are anticipated to be essential to the Master Plan’s success – a Zoning Map
Amendment and a Development Code Amendment. The strategy discussed to date is as follows.
• Process the Annexation application first - to place all of the subject property within the sole
jurisdiction of the City of Springfield.
• Process the Zoning Map Amendment and Development Code Amendment next – to align
zoning district boundaries and permitted uses with the Master Plan proposal such that
applicable criteria could be adequately addressed.
• Process the Master Plan application upon conclusion of the above.
In regard to calendar efficiency, the current strategy is to overlap these various applications as
follows.
• Start the Annexation application process as soon as possible.
• Generate the Zoning Map Amendment and Development Code Amendment applications for
concurrent processing.
o Submit both for their respective Completeness Checks upon the conclusion of the
Annexation application process when the annexation decision is in effect.
Glenwood Riverfront Master Plan Page 6 of 6
Annexation – Development Initiation Meeting – Project Description and List of Questions
May 2, 2024
The Satre Group • 375 West 4th Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 • (541) 686-4540 • www.satregroup.com
• Generate the Master Plan application while the Zoning Map Amendment and Development
Code Amendment are in process.
o Submit the application for its Completeness Check upon the Zoning Map Amendment
and Development Code Amendment applications being deemed complete.
Question: Everyone is anxious to see progress. The intent behind Question 3 is to outline a
strategy of application overlap; to identify a coordinated set of application actions to shorten the
calendar as much as possible. In that regard, is the application overlap identified above
reasonable? Can staff see where yet more overlap, or the saving of more calendar time, be
identified?
4. Anything Else.
Question: Much more could be discussed regarding the Master Plan project and anticipated land
use applications. In specific regard to annexation, is there anything else that staff can provide for
the applicant at this time?
~~~ end of Project Description and List of Questions ~~~
1 THE SATRE GROUP
2 Land Use Planners, Landscape Architects and Environmental Specialists
3 375 West 4th Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401
4 (541) 686-4540 * www.satregroup.com
5
6
7 Glenwood Riverfront Master Plan
8 Annexation DIM - Applicant List
9 May 2, 2024
10
11 Property Owner Mailing Address Phone Contact
12 City of Springfield 225 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541-726-3700 Allie Camp
13 SEDA 225 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541-726-3700 Allie Camp
14 Lane County 125 East 8th Avenue, Eugene, OR 97401
15 Too Blue LLC PO Box 2055, Eugene, OR 97402 541-302-1778 Eric Marvin
16 4340 LLC PO Box 2055, Eugene, OR 97402 541-302-1778 Eric Marvin
17 Roth & Roth LLC PO Box 70468, Springfield, OR 97475 541-988-9819 Steve Roth
18
19
3A Tax Lot Inventory - Applicant-Owner List DRAFT.xlsx Page 1 of 1
1 THE SATRE GROUP Data Source and Notes:
2 Land Use Planners, Landscape Architects and Environmental Specialists 1. Regional Land Information Data Base (RLID).
3 375 West 4th Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 2. City of Springfield.
4 (541) 686-4540 * www.satregroup.com 3. RLID - 'Improved' if Improvement RMV is greater than Land RMV; 'Partial' if Improved RMV is less that Land RMV; 'Vacant' of no Improved RMV.
5 4. URS Historic Resources Baseline Report, October 29, 2013. No structures within the MP area were determined eligible.
6 5. Official Metro Plan, 12/31/10, predates adoption of the GRP and is thus out of date. Designations listed here are from the Spfld Comp Plan and GRP.
7 Glenwood Riverfront Master Plan 6. CMU = Commercial Mixed-Use, RMU = Residential Mixed-Use, ND = Nodal Development; MMA = Multimodal Mixed-Use Area.
8 Annexation DIM - Tax Lot Inventory - Planning and Zoning 7. The /MMA overlay designation is in the GRP but not the Springfield Comprehensive Plan.
9 May 2, 2024
10 MAP City Limits1 Lot Size1 Owner1
11 LOT Metro Plan5 Spfld Comp
Plan
Glenwood
Refinement
Plan
Overlay
Designation7 Base Zone Overlay Zone Inside City
Limits
Mapped
Acreage
Fronts
Franklin Fronts River Floodway /
Floodplain
Riparian /
Greenway
Contains
Improvements Vacant Historic
Inventory4 Name
12 Map 17-03-34-41
13 100 CMU CMU CMU ND / MMA GCMU /GW 6.41 x x x x Too Blue LLC
14 200 CMU CMU CMU ND / MMA GCMU 0.45 x x 4340 LLC
15 300 CMU CMU CMU ND / MMA GCMU 0.83 x x Too Blue LLC
16 400 CMU CMU CMU ND / MMA GCMU 0.79 x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
17 500 CMU, RMU CMU, RMU CMU, RMU ND / MMA GCMU, GRMU 1.55 x Springfield Economic Development Agency
18 700 CMU, RMU CMU, RMU CMU, RMU ND / MMA GCMU, GRMU /GW 2.71 x x x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
19 800 CMU CMU CMU ND / MMA GCMU /GW 1.51 x x x x City of Springfield
20 900 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GCMU 0.18 x Springfield Economic Development Agency
21 1000 CMU, RMU CMU, RMU CMU, RMU ND / MMA GCMU, GRMU 0.16 x Springfield Economic Development Agency
22 1300 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.14 x Springfield Economic Development Agency
23 1500 CMU, RMU CMU, RMU CMU, RMU ND / MMA GCMU, GRMU 1.99 x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
24 Map 17-03-34-42
25 100 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU /GW 1.49 x x x x Roth & Roth LLC
26 200 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.18 x Springfield Economic Development Agency
27 300 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.18 x Springfield Economic Development Agency
28 400 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.18 Partial Springfield Economic Development Agency
29 500 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.34 x Springfield Economic Development Agency
30 501 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.14 x Springfield Economic Development Agency
31 502 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.01 Partial Springfield Economic Development Agency
32 503 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.13 x Lane County
33 504 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.27 Partial Springfield Economic Development Agency
34 600 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.31 x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
35 700 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.33 x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
36 800 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.31 x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
37 900 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.40 x Partial Springfield Economic Development Agency
38 1000 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.33 x Springfield Economic Development Agency
39 1200 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.47 x Springfield Economic Development Agency
40 1300 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.18 x Springfield Economic Development Agency
41 1400 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.18 Partial Springfield Economic Development Agency
42 1500 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU /GW 1.36 x x x x Roth & Roth LLC
43 1600 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU /GW 3.64 x x x x Partial Roth & Roth LLC
44 1700 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.26 x Roth & Roth LLC
45 1800 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.11 x Roth & Roth LLC
46 1900 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.16 x Roth & Roth LLC
47 2000 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.39 Partial Roth & Roth LLC
48 2100 RMU RMU RMU ND / MMA GRMU 0.73 x x Roth & Roth LLC
Lots = 35 Acres = 28.80
Average = 0.82
Zoning District2 Location Improvement Status1, 3Plan Designation2, 6 Natural Resources
3B1 Tax Lot Inventory - Planning Zoning Data DRAFT.xlsx Page 1 of 1
1 THE SATRE GROUP Data Source and Notes:
2 Land Use Planners, Landscape Architects and Environmental Specialists 1. See attached data.
3 375 West 4th Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 2. Legal descriptions found within deeds.
4 (541) 686-4540 * www.satregroup.com 3. Addressing is controlled by the Federal Gov't. All of Glenwood is addressed as Eugene 97403.
5
6
7 Glenwood Riverfront Master Plan
8 Annexation DIM - Tax Lot Inventory - RLID Data
9 May 2, 2024
10 MAP Owner1
11 LOT Air Photo Tax Lot Map FIRM Map Tax Lot
Report
Tax Lot
Record Deed Legal
Descript2 Plat Surveyor
Records
Prior Land
Use Title Report Site Address3 Name
12 Map 17-03-34-41 x x x
13 100 x x x x Too Blue LLC
14 200 x x x x 4340 Franklin Blvd 4340 LLC
15 300 x x x x 4330 Franklin Blvd Too Blue LLC
16 400 x x x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
17 500 x x x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
18 700 x x x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
19 800 x x x x 295 N Brooklyn St City of Springfield
20 900 x x x x 225 N Brooklyn St Springfield Economic Development Agency
21 1000 x x x x 259 1/2 N Brooklyn St Springfield Economic Development Agency
22 1300 x x x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
23 1500 x x x x 4250 Franklin Blvd Springfield Economic Development Agency
24 Map 17-03-34-42 x x x
25 100 x x x x Roth & Roth LLC
26 200 x x x x 288 N Brooklyn St Springfield Economic Development Agency
27 300 x x x x 286 N Brooklyn St Springfield Economic Development Agency
28 400 x x x x 250 N Brooklyn St Springfield Economic Development Agency
29 500 x x x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
30 501 x x x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
31 502 x x x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
32 503 x x x x Lane County
33 504 x x x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
34 600 x x x x 4190 Franklin Blvd Springfield Economic Development Agency
35 700 x x x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
36 800 x x x x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
37 900 x x x x x 4102 Franklin Blvd Springfield Economic Development Agency
38 1000 x x x x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
39 1200 x x x x 207 N Concord St Springfield Economic Development Agency
40 1300 x x x x 267 N Concord St Springfield Economic Development Agency
41 1400 x x x x Springfield Economic Development Agency
42 1500 x x x x 4006 Franklin Blvd Roth & Roth LLC
43 1600 x x x x x Roth & Roth LLC
44 1700 x x x x Roth & Roth LLC
45 1800 x x x x Roth & Roth LLC
46 1900 x x x x 266 N Concord St Roth & Roth LLC
47 2000 x x x x 206 N Concord St Roth & Roth LLC
48 2100 x x x x x Roth & Roth LLC
Lots = 35
Map-Wide Data1 Lot-Specific Data1
3B2 Tax Lot Inventory - RLID Data DRAFT.xlsx Page 1 of 1
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((R(((((35.7'N20°01'ENORTH LINEDLC 82160'90'128.0'N44°W 1049.4'SOUTH 347.93'S16°46'27"E(385')61.0'63'NE CORMCVAYDLC 82N01°30'W2 44+89 .11
105.3'N66°57 1/2'ES65°12'30"W314'NORTH 89.63'S0 6°15'E 98.11'56.0'M STA 71+83.69R=914.93'14.33'39'237.3'(534')S45°27'46"E 83.44'N80°W 1267.2'30'346.7'I.P. SET INCS #623255'NORTH 652'114.72'156.8'25 1+7 5.97
25'115.7'56.0'40'1200S16°46'27"E50'78'S89°16'12"EN89°50'52"E51.3'(130')55'N87°30'WNE CORLOT 6N39°33 1/2'EEASEMENT24 7+4 4.2 6
216.0'EASTRIVE
R
30'80'SOUTH 344.12'4.07'60'42.83'60'80.39'S68°01'40"E3.1'60025'N43°30'W 1320'(365')80'NORTH 362.18'N70°18'30"E39'N01°42'55"W60'(533')105.3'R=192.23'N60°W 217.8'510'I.P. SET INCS #6232141.01'EAST58.9'EAST 81.0'138'N01°57'59"W 187.20'LEFT BANKMEANDER PT216.0'35.7'MCKENZIE243+75.7 5S71°52'26"W56.0'412.0'92.29'N07 °41'10"W 82.8 3'105.3'50'60'266.70'11.16RIGHT BANKMEANDER PT50'NORTH 211.13'128.69'56.9'65.3'63.30'160.0'WILLAMETTE126.08'WEST 237.26'PC 238+95.00412.0'N40°01'46"E(107')67.0'27'N76°34'53"W160050'S89°59'40"ES41°11'E 633.9'N01°30'WS35°10'E 470.8'128'NORTH 205'30'17.58'34.58'78'10'N 41°W 283.8'56.91'51.3'M STA 73+52.0211.1661.0'60'NORTH 369.29'S.38212242+77.78BRIDGE (WESTBOUND)56.0'24 6+7 1.9 5 HIGHWAY19.91'115.7'164.2'93.2'WEST0.32'S77°28'8"E31.12'R=60'S88°12'34"E124.97'R=835'0.07 AC0.14 AC0.07 AC0.07 AC0.4 AC0.64 AC0.16 AC1.54 AC2.99 AC1.58 AC0.15 AC0.18 AC6.99 AC0.19 AC0.44 AC0.85 AC0.77 AC1.75 AC0.09 AC21001900170018001300140010005007008001100900100200020030040015002001004-80004-28004-26019-99019-00019-02004-80SEE MAP17033523SEE MAP17033444SEE MAP17033442SEE MAP17033532SEE MAP17033414SEE MAP17033443FOR ASSESSMENT ANDTAXATION ONLYN.E.1/4 S.E.1/4 SEC. 34 T.17S. R.3W. W.M.Lane County1" = 100'CANCELLED600120016002001200017033441SPRINGFIELDSPRINGFIELD17033441LCATJCG - 2019-01-10 13:40REVISIONS10/28/2011 - LCAT115 - CONVERT MAP TO GIS06/24/2016 - LCAT142 - DIV TL 2001 O.O. TL 200003/07/2017 - LCAT142 - PTN TL'S 200-400 & 1500 OUT TO ROADS01/10/2019 - LCAT174 - CODE CHANGE TL 2100 & PTN OF HWY
(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((RR(((()((R172.65'N69°34'W115'4° CLD=9°40'30"ST=121.22L=241.88'35138'25'35N76°EFRANKLINN0°06'EBLVD.36(219.97')238'NORTH CONCORD ST.60'44.23'60'71.9'128'N1°26'W 861.15'(334.44')35125'N68°46'WWEST47'ANGLE POINT INLEFT BANK MEANDERN76°13'E 178.1'5.07'138.00' M/L(73')S89°43'W59.7'(213.36')138'55'66.4'34.5'917.51'N0°6'22"W 1013.2'60'250.8'25'128'N0°12'E 253.5'N80°WPARKN77°4'30"E 425.68'197.24'497.83'SOUTH (91.47')N0°9'W 91.06' (DEED)SOUTH 105'WILLAMETTE35EAST 66.38'32.12'80'(510') 447.5' M/L TO RIVER2803N89°51'E60'N21°14'E 185.18'194.5'13.58'147'917.51'N0°19'30"E256.8'WEST128.1'WEST72.5'2801100.51'60'128.1'127.54'60'N0°9'W 405.2'McKENZIE74.2'4.56'45'58.54'187.48'(81')128'60'(975.48') 14.785CH M/L (753')60'113.38'65.6'100'35750.65'209.49'S72°W60'280447'45'510'RIVER BANK BY AERIAL PHOTO395.2' (HWY) 402.06'25'ROADWAYGAPN69°44'W7.94'59.71'138'HWY58'107'69.5'35N69°34'E40'N.E. COR.C.B. SWEETD.L.C. 6160'(186.39')66.4'69.96'36LOT 6 11.16SOUTH60.1'32'246'108.97'(139.70')SOUTH38.75'(100.28')60'13'115'113.38'161'43.1'14.785 CH. M/L TO RIVER (978.48')3510'PC 238+95.00R=1395.19'L=100.83'40'N21°14'E186.03'127.68'58.57'N.W. COR.GOVT. LOT 6N29°4'30"W13'60.75'60'LEFT BANK MEANDER53.2'209'S21°14'W 217.22'1100128'13'N0°6'22"W 1013.2'81.9'161'100'44.7'N69°37'W0.5'58.3'GLENWOOD3513.6CH (897.6')(205.96')502.83'3571.98'RIVER42'72'N69°34'W 122.88'60'60'S0°19'W 196.26'NORTH53'132.05'147.5'S0°19'WNW CORDON MCVAYDLC 82S1°07'W 159.47'NORTH 242.9'60.1'S 77°26'13" E(NW COR DON MCVAYDLC 82 FOR TAXLOTTINGPURPOSES)0.74 AC0.47 AC0.31 AC0.01 AC0.32 AC0.4 AC0.27 AC0.31 AC0.69 AC0.27 AC0.33 AC0.39 AC0.13 AC0.34 AC4.88 AC1.36 AC0.36 AC3.29 AC1.5 AC2.55 AC2.57 AC3.3 AC0.09 AC0.04 AC0.02 AC0.18 AC0.18 AC0.31 AC0.14 AC0.18 AC0.18 AC0.18 AC0.07 AC29001200180040014006007005028009002300220021005041000200050350030013001700200280215001001900280025002700260024001600701801901501601004-28004-26019-02004-80SEE MAP17033443SEE MAP17033431SEE MAP17033413SEE MAP17033424SEE MAP17033434SEE MAP17033441SEE MAP17033444FOR ASSESSMENT ANDTAXATION ONLYN.W.1/4 S.E.1/4 SEC. 34 T.17S. R.3W. W.M.Lane County1" = 100'CANCELLED110028012803280480090080117033442SPRINGFIELDSPRINGFIELD17033442LCATJCG - 2019-01-10 13:44REVISIONS01/06/2012 - LCAT142 - CONVERT MAP TO GIS09/23/2016 - LCAT174 - NTL 701 OUT OF TL 70009/23/2016 - LCAT174 - NTL 801 OUT OF TL 80009/23/2016 - LCAT174 - NTL 901 OUT OF TL 90009/29/2017 - LCAT155 - NTL 601 OUT OF 60001/10/2019 - LCAT174 - CODE CHANGE TL'S 601,701,801, & 901
1 Glenwood Riverfront Master Plan
2 Applications and Approvals Related to the Master Plan
3 A VERY GENERALIZED Process Calendar
4 February 2024
5
6
7 2nd Quarter 2024 3rd Quarter 2024 4th Quarter 2024 1st Quarter 2025 2nd Quarter 2025 3rd Quarter 2025 4th Quarter 2025 1st Quarter 2026 2nd Quarter 2026 3rd Quarter 2026 4th Quarter 2026
8 April 2024 July October January 2025 April July October January 2026 April July October
9 Annexation Generate Submit
10 Re-Submit
11 Decision
12 Zoning Map Amendment Generate Submit
13 Re-Submit
14 Decision
15 Code Amendment Generate Submit
16 Re-Submit
17 Decision
18 Preliminary Master Plan Generate Submit
19 Re-Submit
20 Decision
21 Final Master Plan Submit
22 Re-Submit
23 Decision
24 Tentative Subdivision Survey Field Work Generate Submit
25 Re-Submit
26 Decision
27 Final Subdivision / Plat Generate Submit
28 Re-Submit
29 Decision
30 Public Improvement Plans Generate Submit
31 Re-Submit
32 Decision
33
Page 1 of 1