HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication Applicant 4/5/2024Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Land Division Tentative Plan
Partition, Subdivision
Application Type (Applicant: check one)
Partition Tentative Pre-Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Pre-Submittal:
Partition Tentative Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Submittal:
Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section)
Applicant Name: Phone:
Company: Fax:
Address:
Applicant’s Rep.: Phone:
Company: Fax:
Address:
Property Owner: Phone:
Company: Fax:
Address:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: TAX LOT NO(S):
Property Address:
Size of Property: Acres Square Feet
Proposed Name of Subdivision:
Description of
Proposal:
If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Existing Use:
# of Lots/Parcels: Total acreage of parcels/
allowable density:
Proposed #
Dwell Units
Signatures: Please sign and print your name and date in the appropriate box on the next page.
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: complete this section)
Associated Applications: Signs:
Pre-Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by:
Case No.: Date: Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Postage Fee: $
TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER:
x
Brian Thoreson 541-912-6607
Hayden Homes
2464 SW Glacier Pl #100 Redmond, OR 97756
Scott Morris 541-302-9790
A & O Engineering LLC
380 Q Street Suite 200 Springfield, OR 97477
Will Goodwin
PO Box 2617 Eugene, OR 97402
18-02-04-00 3800,3500
5410 Mt Vernon Rd Springfield, OR 97478; near Mt Vernon
36.1 x
Woodland Ridge Phase 5 - 8
single family lots - addition to Woodland Ridge Subdivision
vacant
207
SSR Investments LLC
(503) 936-3852
Revised 1/7/14 kl 4 of 10
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and
accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the
owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory
timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative.
Date:
Pre-Submittal
Owner:
Signature
Print
Consistent with the completeness check I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City.
Signature
Date:
Owner:
performed on this application at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise
contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a
Print
complete application.
Submittal
Land Division Tentative Application Process
1.Applicant Submits a Land Division Tentative Application for Pre-Submittal
The application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet.
A pre-submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre-submittal
meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon.
William Goodwin
4/1/2024
Revised 1/7/14 kl 5 of 10
Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre-submittal meetings within five to seven
working days of receiving an application.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre-Submittal Meeting
The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre-
submittal meeting.
The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and
Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall’s office, and the Planning
Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes.
The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre-Submittal Checklist specifying the items
required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the
applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City.
3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and
Issue a Decision
A complete application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal
Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet.
A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless
appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.
Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the
property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition,
the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property.
There is a 14-day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed.
Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their
comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval
criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those
given notice.
Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
At the applicant’s request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision
prior to issuing the final land use decision.
The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is
effective on the day it is mailed.
The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15
calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official.
Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE:
Revised 1/7/14 kl 6 of 10
ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre-Submittal and Submittal.
If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please
state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form.
Application Fee – refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public
Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected
at the pre-submittal and submittal stages.
Land Division Tentative Application Form
Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the
action to be taken. Density - list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density
and the density proposed.
Copy of the Deed
Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances.
Copy of the Land Division Plan Reduced to 8½”x 11”, which will be mailed as part of
the required neighboring property notification packet.
Right-of-Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage
on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed
Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations, and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures
Manual.
Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City’s
transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given
development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also
address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives.
Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre-Submittal OR
Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets:
All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved
and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of
preparation.
All plan sets must be folded to 8½” by 11” and bound by rubber bands.
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer
Revised 1/7/14 kl 7 of 10
Vicinity Map
The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings,
curb cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and
what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use
and required setbacks from proposed property lines.
The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse
Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department
The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment
or Letter of Map Revision
The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department
Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5” in diameter or greater when
measured 4 ½ feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian
areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings
Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of
Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted
concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable
soils and/or a high water table
b. Land Division Tentative Plan
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor
City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district
boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division
Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the
proposed land division
Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land
division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate
dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale
Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and
area of illumination
Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys,
dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division.
Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and
relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan,
Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map.
Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities
Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways
Location of existing and proposed transit facilities
Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian
access ways and bike trails
Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas,
telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points
The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose,
condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated
Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as specified
in SDC 5.12-120 E.
c. Stormwater Management Plan
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are
proposed as part of the stormwater management system
Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but
not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater
quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained
Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for
land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals)
Amount of proposed cut and fill
Additional Materials That May be Required
IT IS THE APPLICANT’S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS
DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120:
Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner’s Association Agreement
Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal
as specified in SDC 3.2-230
Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of
bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the
top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present
Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the
additional standards of the overlay district
If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified
in SDC 5.19-100
A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property
Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence
the permit application has been submitted for review
Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land
and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
225 FIFTH STREET
Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100
and 5.21-100
An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is
be served by sanitary sewer
proposed outside of the city limits but within the City’s urban service area and can
All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate
time of installation and method of financing
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.726.3753
FAX: 541.736.1021
www.springfield-or.gov
December 6, 2013
REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY:
In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial “stormwater scoping sheet,” provided to help
engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and
Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became
apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added
bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of
decisions.
As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process.
Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require
development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater
scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet,
which reflects changes requested by the development community.
PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A
COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS
DIRECTIONS FOR USING STORMWATER SCOPING SHEETS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location.
2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study.
(Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.)
3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Attn: Clayton
McEachern.
4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete
stormwater study.
5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater
study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The
scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study.
Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter)
as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: http://www.springfield-
or.gov/DPW/EngineeringandConstructionResources.htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Forms
section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process.
Sincerely,
Clayton McEachern, PE
City of Springfield, Development and Public Works
Email: cmceachern@springfield-or.gov
Phone: (541) 736 – 1036
Fax: (541) 736 – 1021
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.726.3753
FAX: 541.726.1021
www.springfield-or.gov
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
------------------------------------------------- (Area below this line filled out by Applicant) --------------------------------------------------
(Please return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield Development and Public Works; Fax # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036),
email:cmceachern@springfield-or.gov
Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor’s map):
Applicant:
Approx. Impervious Area:
Project Name:
Date:
Phone #: Land Use(s):
Email:
Assessors Parcel #:
Project Size (Acres): Fax #:
Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary:
Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices:
--------------------------------- (Area below this line filled out by the City and Returned to the Applicant) ----------------------------
(At a minimum, all boxes checked by the City on the front and back of this sheet shall be submitted
for an application to be complete for submittal, although other requirements may be necessary.)
Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, UH may be substituted for Rational Method)
Small Site Study – (use Rational Method for calculations)
Mid-Level Development Study – (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
Full Drainage Development Study – (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
Environmental Considerations:
Soil Type:
Floodway/Floodplain:
Other Jurisdictions
Hillside Development: Wellhead Zone:
Wetland/Riparian:
Downstream Analysis:
N/A
Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation:
Manhole/Junction to take analysis to:
Return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachern@springfield-or,gov, FAX: (541) 736-1021
For Official Use Only:
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS
*Based upon the information provided on the front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is needed for an
application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu of the Springfield
Development Code (SDC) or the City’s Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site
approval; Additional site specific information may be required. Note: Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completed form has been
signed in the space provided below:
Req’d N/A
Calculations showing system capacity for a 2-year storm event and overflow effects of a 25-year storm event.
Other/Miscellaneous
A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map.
Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set.
A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC).
Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to
another.
The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins.
Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3)
Where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth
in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual.
For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified
by the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (Sec2.4.1).
Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM.
General Study Requirements (EDSPM Section 4.03)
Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre-development rates for the 2 through 25-year storm events.
Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon.
Manning’s “n” values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to
achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well.
Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drains.
Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable.
All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall
All non-building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration
media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by
vegetated methods.
Review of Downstream System (EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C)
If a stormwater treatment swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes,
bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene’s Stormwater Management Manual.
be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure.
Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04).
Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of
residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to
the website: http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/uic/uic.htm for more information.
Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or
proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb load
without failure of the pipe structure.
*This form shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, of the stormwater study.
* IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW AND SIGN!
As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study
and plan set. Sginature Date .
Form Version 5: June 2015
Document Date April 5, 2024
Applicant’s Request Woodland 5-8 Subdivision
Property Owner/Applicant Brian Thoreson
Hayden Homes LLC
2464 SW Glacier Pl Ste 100
Redmond, OR 97756
Property Owner SSR Investments
PO Box 2617
Eugene, OR 97402
Applicant’s Representative Scott Morris, PE
A & O Engineering, LLC
380 Q St, Ste 200
Springfield, OR 97477
Subject Property Assessors Map 18-02-04-00
Tax Lot 3800,3500
Location 5410 Mt Vernon Rd
Springfield, OR 97478
Property Size 36.1 Acres
Zoning LDR (Low Density Residential
Background
This is an application for the tentative plat of Woodland Ridge Phases 5 through 8 to create
207 residential lots and supporting infrastructure. This is the next addition of the existing
Woodland Ridge Subdivision (case #811-18-000007-TYP2).
The subject property is located in Springfield and is zoned Low Density Residential (LDR)
Annexation of the subject property was completed on March 4th, 2024 as part of ordinance
No. 6474.
There are no existing structures or other impervious surfaces on the subject property.
In this written statement, Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-145 Land Divisions –
Partitions and Subdivisions Plat Criteria are addressed to demonstrate that this application
clearly meets all of the SDC requirements and criteria. Within this document, the SDC text
excerpts are in italics and the applicant’s responses are in plain text.
SDC 5.12-115 Plat Criteria
The Director, in consultation with the City Surveyor and City Engineer, shall approve or deny
the Plat. Approval shall be based on compliance with the following criteria:
A. The lot/parcel dimensions shall conform to the minimum standards of this code. When
lots/parcels are more than double the minimum are permitted by the zoning district, the
Director shall require that these lots/parcels be arranged:
The proposed lots are in conformance with the minimum standards of Springfield
development code. There are 12 lots in phase 8 that range from 2,665 square feet to
2,700 square feet. A minor variance application will be submitted concurrent with
the tentative subdivision to request these lots to remain below the 3,000 sf
minimum requirement.
B. Double frontage lots/parcels shall be avoided, unless necessary to prevent access to
residential development from collector and arterial streets or to overcome specific
topographic situations.
No double frontage lots are proposed as part of this subdivision
C. Panhandle lots/parcels shall comply with the standards specified in SDC 3.2.215 and
4.2.120(A). In the case of multiple panhandles in Subdivisions, construction of necessary
utilities to serve all approved panhandle lots/parcels shall occur prior to recording the Plat.
No panhandle lots are proposed as part of this subdivision.
D. Public street standards as specified in SDC 4.2.105 (block length)
All block lengths are less than 600 feet except the sections between S. 53rd Street and S.
54th Street. These are closer to 700 feet due to topography on the site making it difficult
to meet the 600 foot requirement in these (3) sections. The applicant requests this
additional length due to site constraints. Traffic circulation is adequate with the blocks
as shown on the tentative site plan.
SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements
A. General Requirements
1) The Tentative Plan, including any required Future Development Plan, shall be
prepared by an Oregon Licensed Professional Land Surveyor on standard sheets of 18
inches x 24 inches. The services of an Oregon Licensed Professional Engineer may also be
required by the City in order to resolve utility issues (especially stormwater management,
street design and transportation issues), and site constraint and/or water quality issues.
The tentative plan has been prepared by Scott Morris, PE of A & O Engineering, and
Ryan Erickson, PLS of EGR and Associates in order to adequately and
comprehensively address all standards and requirements of this code, including
stormwater management, street design, transportation issues and site constraints. A
landscape architect has completed the stormwater planting sheets.
(2) The scale of the Tentative Plan shall be appropriate to the area involved and the
amount of detail and data, normally 1 inch = 50 feet, 1 inch = 100 feet, or 1 inch = 200 feet.
A scale of 1 inch = 80 feet has been used to be able to show the entire development
area on one plan sheet.
(3) A north arrow and the date the Tentative Plan was prepared.
A north arrow and date are included on the tentative subdivision plan drawing set that
is being submitted with this application.
(4) The name and address of the owner, applicant, if different, and the Land Surveyor
and/or Engineer who prepared the Partition Tentative Plan.
All of the above information has been included on the cover sheet of this narrative and
is also located on the plan set included with this submittal.
(5) A drawing of the boundaries of the entire area owned by the partitioner or subdivider of
which the proposed land division is a part.
The boundaries of subject property are shown on the site plan.
(6) City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and any special service district
boundaries or railroad right-of-way, which cross or abut the proposed land division.
The remainder of the Woodland Ridge development is within the Springfield city limits.
The annexation was completed on March 4th, 2024.
(7) Applicable zoning districts and the Metro Plan designation of the proposed land
division and of properties within 100 feet of the boundary of the subject property.
The subject property is zoned LDR (Low Density Residential) and designated Low
Density in the Metro Plan. All adjacent properties to the East and South are designated
for low-density residential zoning.
(8) The dimensions (in feet) and size (either in square feet or acres) of each lot/parcel and
the approximate dimensions of each building site, where applicable, and the top and toe of cut
and fill slopes to scale.
The proposed lot sizes (square feet) are clearly labeled on the attached tentative
subdivision plan drawing set.
(9) The location, outline to scale and present use of all existing structures to remain on the
property after platting and their required setbacks from the proposed new property lines.
There are no existing structures on the property. Therefore this criterion is not
applicable.
(10) The location and size of existing and proposed utilities and necessary easements and
dedications on and adjacent to the site, including, but not limited to, sanitary sewer mains,
stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate
the proposed connection points.
The City of Springfield has an existing wastewater trunk line that runs through the
property on the South side in a public utility easement. This existing system will provide
service stubs to the project at various locations with new mainlines installed in rights of
way to serve the individual house development.
The development will include the construction of three stormwater management facilities
to serve the project. The facilities will include a collection system (curb inlets and
mainlines) which will be routed to one of three detention and treatment ponds within the
project area. The stormwater run-off will be treated per requirements in the updated 2024
Springfield stormwater code. Treated stormwater will then be detained within the ponds
and metered out through underdrains in the rock chambers and weir outlet structures
similar to Woodland Ridge Phase 3 to keep post-construction peak flow rates at or below
the existing condition. The run-off will then be routed to historic drainage path offsite.
Springfield Utility Board has provided a master water service plan for the development of
all phases of Woodland Ridge. The routing plan is prescriptive and will provide
connection points at :
• Holly Street (West End) - This has been constructed as part of Woodland Ridge
phase 3.
• South 51st Place (North) - This has been constructed as part of Woodland Ridge
phase 3
• Holly Street (East End) - Future connection to the existing facilities in Pinehurst
Subdivision.
• Pinehurst Street (East End) – Future connection to existing facilities in Pinehurst
Subdivision
Sub Electric - There are existing electric utility connections at Holly Street (West & East),
South 51st Place (North) and Pinehurst Street (East) to serve the proposed development.
SUB electric has indicated there is adequate capacity to serve this development.
Comcast Cable - There are existing cable utility connections at Holly Street (West &
East), South 51st Place (North) and Pinehurst Street (East) to serve the proposed
development. Comcast has indicated there is adequate capacity to serve this
development.
NW Natural Gas - There are existing natural gas connections at Holly Street (West &
East), South 51st Place (North) and Pinehurst Street (East) to serve the proposed
development. NW Natural Gas has indicated there is adequate capacity to serve this
development.
See the plan set dated 4-5-2024 for more information on the existing and proposed
utilities within the development.
(11) The locations, widths and purpose of all existing or proposed easements on and
abutting the proposed land division; the location of any existing or proposed reserve strips.
All proposed public and private easements are shown on the attached Civil Engineering
Plan drawing set
(12) The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose,
condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated.
The attached Civil Engineering Utility Plan sheets show the areas to be dedicated to the
public for streets, sidewalks and public utilities. Tracts are also shown around the
stormwater detention facility that is proposed to be dedicated to the City of Springfield
for long term ownership/maintenance.
B. A Site Assessment of the Entire Development Area
Existing wetlands on site as well as proposed impacts are shown on included Civil
engineering plans. A joint fill permit will be obtained (if necessary) prior to any work
within the boundaries of the delineated and concurred wetland area.
The proposed site is located outside of the 100-year floodplain and floodway
boundaries of the site. The proposed site is outside of the 100 year flood zone,
therefore it is not applicable.
There are no physical features that preclude development on the proposed property.
A tree felling permit will be submitted prior to start of construction for each phase
where trees will be required to be removed.
The soil types on the proposed property include:
Salkum Silty Clay Loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Salkum Silty Clay Loam, 8 to 16 percent slopes
Linslaw Loam
C. A Stormwater Management Plan
A stormwater management plan for the development showing compliance with the
applicable provisions of SDC 4.3.110 and the Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual has been included with this submittal.
D. A response to Transportation issues
A Traffic Impact study has been completed and is included as part of this submittal. All
proposed streets and parking have been designed in compliance with City of Springfield
development code
E. A Future Development Plan
(1) Indicates the proposed redivision, including the boundaries, lot/parcel and
sequencing of each proposed redivision in any residential district, and shall include
a plot plan showing building footprints for compliance with the minimum residential
densities specified in SDC 3.2.205;
(2) Addresses street connectivity between the various phases of the proposed
development based upon compliance with the Springfield Transportation System
Plan (including the Conceptual Street Map), the Regional Transportation Plan
(RTP), applicable Refinement Plans, Plan Districts, Master Plans, or this code;
Street connectivity throughout Woodland Ridge and adjacent streets have
been shown on the included plan set. A TIA has also been completed and
included with this submittal.
The existing lot East of phase 7 (including the panhandle portion to Mt.
Vernon) has recently been purchased by the applicant. Therefore, right of
way for extension of roadways and utilities to the Pinehurst Subdivision can
be dedicated when appropriate. Future development of the lot East of phase
7 will be completed at a later date under a separate subdivision application.
Properties to the West, North and East have been fully developed and there
is a railroad mainline along the entire South property line. Therefore, no
other future extensions are available or proposed.
(3) Discusses the timing and financial provisions relating to phasing.
There are 8 phases proposed in total for Woodland Ridge. This submittal is
covering phases 5-8. See table for building timeline.
Phase 5 43 Lots Fall 2024
Phase 6 61 Lots Spring 2025
Phase 7 63 Lots Fall 2025
Phase 8 40 Lots Spring 2026
The above proposed construction/plat schedule is contingent on market
conditions. Each phase will have bonding of public improvements as
required by City of Springfield prior to plat recording of each phase.
5.12.125 Tentative Plan Criteria
(A) The request conforms to the provisions of this code pertaining to lot/parcel size and
dimensions.
The average lot size is 4,402 square feet which conforms with Springfield
Development Code standards. There are 12 lots below the 3,000 square foot
minimum which is being addressed with a minor variance application
concurrent with this submittal. The average lot frontage is 45 feet, meeting
the needs of the development as well as the City of Springfield housing
goals.
(B) Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to,
water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and
streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public
improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development,
unless otherwise provided for by this code and other applicable regulations. The
Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues.
There is an existing wastewater trunk line running on the South end of the
property that accounted for flow from this basin, so there is adequate
capacity to serve the proposed development.
SUB water has also provided a schematic water design and confirmed there
is adequate water supply to serve the development including the area above
the 550 foot elevation which is considered “high level service area”.
All other utilities are available to the site and have adequate capacity.
(C) The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private
design and construction standards contained in this code and other applicable
regulations.
(D) Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or
geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees
and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian
areas; other riparian areas and wetlands specified in SDC 4.3.117; rock
outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological
significance, as may be specified in SDC 3.3.900 or ORS 97.740.760, 358.905.955
and 390.235.240, shall be protected as specified in this code or in State or Federal
law.
A wetland delineation was completed and concurred by Division of State
Lands and Army Corp of Engineers and is shown on the site plan. In
addition, a geotechnical investigation was completed by GeoPacific
Engineering Inc. and their report is included with the tentative submittal.
There are no physical features that would prevent developing the property as
designed and shown on the proposed site plan.
(E) Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular
traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity
within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops,
neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas;
minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this code or
other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management
standards for State highways.
The engineer of record displays proposed parking traffic, bicycle, and
pedestrian safety measures that comply with City of Springfield
development code. A TIA has been included with this submittal.
(F) Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be
accomplished as specified in this code.
Due to wetlands and geotechnical issues on the ridge, no additional site
development is proposed. The applicant is in the process of purchasing a
parcel the East of phase 7 that will be eventually developed under a separate
subdivision application.
(G) Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its
development as specified in this code.
The proposed development is designed in such a way that adjacent land has
been provided access to and is able to be developed in the future.
The site abuts the railroad tracks and Jasper Road on the south site. On the
west, east and north is existing residential development. On the east is a
vacant property that Hayden Homes is in the process of purchasing and plans
for future development.
5.12.130 Tentative Plan Conditions
(A) Dedication of Right-of-Way and/or Utility Easements.
(1) Right-of-way, when shown in the Springfield Transportation System Plan (including
the Conceptual Street Map), the transportation elements of refinement plans, or as
specified in Table 4.2.1.
(2) Easements as specified in SDC 4.3.140, when necessary to provide services,
including, but not limited to: sanitary sewers, stormwater management, water and
electricity, to the site and neighboring properties. The dedication of easements shall also
include any easements required to access and maintain watercourses or wetlands that are
part of the City’s Stormwater Management System.
All proposed tracts, rights of way and easements are shown on the proposed site plan.
(C) Installation of traffic signals and signs; restricting access to and from arterial or
collector streets; requiring a frontage road; restricting and strategically locating driveways;
and/or requiring the joint use of driveways to serve 2 or more lots/parcels through a Joint
Use/Access Agreement when transportation safety issues are identified by the Transportation
Planning Engineer and/or a Traffic Impact Study.
No new traffic signals are proposed as part of this subdivision. No joint use driveways
are proposed as part of this subdivision.
(D) Modification of the layout of parcel lines caused by the location of streets, required
stormwater management systems, including, but not limited to: swales and detention basins or
when required by the Geotechnical report specified in SDC 5.12.120.
A geotechnical report has been prepared and it included in this submittal. The only
geotechnical item that required moving a road is at the North end of the site. The
proposed extension of Cedar View drive through phase 7 is required to angle further
South away from the ridge due to an old potential landslide hazard. This is shown on
the site plan sheet and addresses the geotechnical concern in the area.
(G) Submittal of a Land and Drainage Alteration Permit.
A Land and Drainage Alteration Permit will be submitted as part of the PIP process and
prior to starting construction. Additionally, a 1200c permit will be obtained from the
Department of Environmental Quality prior to start of construction.
"
F fi r f I I
ri ,
16
// / � Yrlf a Fn � • a f 1 h i• 1 � �.'i
s n F
u rt
. � +} •a. .,F �I F u u a d � ,�
`.
4 F
#/ +�•,� � d dry P{ F I F C�i
I a l j 1 R
qgppge� F d
F�+ ya�
ani -
d d d n M F F
TRACT S 1 ..0 a l a a a 91 P i�
oil. �. :E#� s+js RI•is
ro � Vim' .:�� '° yr r■ ■ r�
2=161
_qq
S2 g
! mm5yo M ■� ik xBx tf4 `$ 3 4
■LYISISS SlIBMFI'FALS _ti3„ h
UOS�S `��� y� A&0Enp..MLLC
�rF �.� l:` +,
I x For Phases 5 8 of
ttr �, Woodland Ridge Subdzvislo�J II�
,, „ySa•n ar
..a'r sr w rmn.v.aaawn 1w.�■
�., ., ■„ $pr,ngfield Lane County Or¢gor, o..n
SANDOWENGINEERING
160 MADISON STREET SUITE A EUGENE, OREGON 97402 541.513.3376
Date: February 12, 2024
TO: Michael Liebler PE
City of Springfield
FROM: Kelly Sandow PE
Sandow Engineering
RE: Woodland Ridge Phase 5-8 Fiscal “Fair Share” Evaluation
The following provides an update to the Woodland Ridge Subdivision Fiscal “Fair Share” calculation
for the intersection of Bob Straub Parkway at Daisy Street. The update to the “Fair Share” calculation
follows the specific methodology utilized by the City of Springfield in Section 1.1.5 of the Annexation
Agreement dated June 13, 2022.
The current development proposal for Phases 5-8 includes 206 single family lots. Using the trip rates
for Land Use Code 210-Single Family Residential from the 11
th ed of the ITE Trip Generation Manuals,
the PM peak hour trips are estimated at 196
1. As provided in the Woodland Ridge Subdivision Phase
3-8 Traffic Impact Analysis by Access Engineering dated February 21, 2002, during the PM peak hour
25% of the total site trips will use the intersection of Bob Straub Parkway at Daisy Street. Therefore,
the PM peak hour trips estimated to use the Bob Straub Parkway at Daisy Street intersection is 49
(25% of 196 total trips) with the current site plan.
The “Fair Share” contribution is calculated as “49 site trips/525 minimum traffic volumes needed for
meeting a signal warrant”, which results in 9% of the total trips to the signal. The traffic signal is
estimated at a cost of $1,500,000. Therefore, 9% of the total cost attributed to the phases 5-8
construction is $135,000.
1 PM peak hour fitted curve equation for trip calculation: LN(T)=0.94LN(Units)+0.27
SANDOWENGINEERING
160 MADISON STREET SUITE A EUGENE, OREGON 97402 541.513.3376
Date: December 12, 2023
TO: Scott Morris PE
A&O Engineering
FROM: Kelly Sandow PE
Sandow Engineering
RE: Woodland Ridge Subdivision-Traffic Impact Analysis
Sandow Engineering is pleased to provide this work scope and fee estimate for traffic engineering
services for an update to the Woodland Ridge subdivision Traffic Impact Analysis.
The work scope is based on the increase of 44 residential lots. If the number of lots further increases,
the work scope may change.
Task 1: Coordination of Work Scope
Sandow Engineering will work with the City on the final Scope of Work.
Task 2: Trip Generation and Distribution
Sandow Engineering will prepare a trip generation and distribution calculation for the revised site
plan. The intent is to determine the number of total trips to the intersection of Daisy Street at Bob
Straub Parkway.
Task 3: Proportional Share Calculation
Sandow Engineering will update the rough proportionality calculation for the traffic signal at Daisy
Street and Bob Straub Parkway. The calculations will be provided in
Fee Estimate:
Sandow Engineering proposes that the tasks for this project be performed on a time-and-materials
basis with a not-to-exceed amount for each task as described below:
Task 1: Scope of Work $300
Task 2: Trip Generation and Distribution $450
Task 3: Proportional Share Calculation $750
TOTAL $1,500
Signed and dated below, this proposal can serve as our contract and notice to proceed. Preparation
for and attendance at any meetings and any items not identified in this proposal will be billed
separately in accordance with our rate schedule. Any analysis required/requested from the reviewing
agencies or client outside of the anticipated work items listed above will be considered outside of the
contract and will be billed separately. Costs for additional items will not be incurred without consent
from the project owner.
RE: Traffic Engineering Services Fee Estimate
Date: 12.12.23
Page 2
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this proposal. We look forward to working
with you.
Sincerely,
Kelly Sandow, PE
Name
Signature
Billings Sent to:
Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone:
Email:
...DesignerDate03/29/2024ScaleNot to ScaleDrawing No.Summary1 of 1Current ViewStatisticsDescription Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/MinHolly Street 0.3 fc 0.7 fc 0.1 fc 7.0:1 3.0:1North Local 0.3 fc 0.8 fc 0.1 fc 8.0:1 3.0:1North Stub 0.3 fc 0.6 fc 0.1 fc 6.0:1 3.0:1South Local 0.3 fc 0.7 fc 0.1 fc 7.0:1 3.0:1ScheduleSymbol Label Image Quantity Manufacturer Catalog Number DescriptionNumberLampsLumensPer LampLight LossFactorWattage PlotA41AmericanElectricLightingATB010BLEDE70XXXXX R24K/5KATB0 SERIES LED 700MATYPE 2 4000K/5000KCCT129941 25
...DesignerDate03/29/2024ScaleNot to ScaleDrawing No.Summary1 of 1Current ViewStatisticsDescription Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/MinHolly Street 0.3 fc 0.7 fc 0.1 fc 7.0:1 3.0:1North Local 0.3 fc 0.8 fc 0.1 fc 8.0:1 3.0:1North Stub 0.3 fc 0.6 fc 0.1 fc 6.0:1 3.0:1South Local 0.3 fc 0.7 fc 0.1 fc 7.0:1 3.0:1ScheduleSymbol Label Image Quantity Manufacturer Catalog Number DescriptionNumberLampsLumensPer LampLight LossFactorWattage PlotA41AmericanElectricLightingATB010BLEDE70XXXXX R24K/5KATB0 SERIES LED 700MATYPE 2 4000K/5000KCCT129941 25
...DesignerDate03/29/2024ScaleNot to ScaleDrawing No.Summary1 of 1Current ViewStatisticsDescription Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/MinHolly Street 0.3 fc 0.7 fc 0.1 fc 7.0:1 3.0:1North Local 0.3 fc 0.8 fc 0.1 fc 8.0:1 3.0:1North Stub 0.3 fc 0.6 fc 0.1 fc 6.0:1 3.0:1South Local 0.3 fc 0.7 fc 0.1 fc 7.0:1 3.0:1ScheduleSymbol Label Image Quantity Manufacturer Catalog Number DescriptionNumberLampsLumensPer LampLight LossFactorWattage PlotA41AmericanElectricLightingATB010BLEDE70XXXXX R24K/5KATB0 SERIES LED 700MATYPE 2 4000K/5000KCCT129941 25
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 6474
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY (VACANT PROPERTY FORMERLY
ADDRESSED AS 5400 MT VERNON ROAD AND IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S MAP 18-02-04-00,
TAX LOT 3500 AND PORTIONS OF TAX LOTS 3600 & 3800, AND AN APPROXIMATELY 30-FOOT
WIDE BY 196-FOOT LONG SEGMENT OF MT VERNON ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY) TO THE CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD AND WILLAMALANE PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT; WITHDRAWING THE SAME
TERRITORY FROM THE WILLAKENZIE RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT; ADOPTING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield Development Code (SDC) Article 5.7.100 and
Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 222 to accept, process, and act upon annexations to the City;
WHEREAS, a request to annex certain territory was submitted on December 14, 2023, said territory being
Assessor's Map Township 18 South, Range 02 West, Section 04, Map 00, Tax Lot 3500 and portions of
Tax Lots 3600 & 3800 which is generally depicted and more particularly described in Exhibit A to this
Ordinance;
WHEREAS, an approximately 30-foot wide by 196-foot long segment of Mt Vernon Road public right-of-
way abutting the subject property is to be concurrently annexed with the subject territory and said public
road right-of-way is generally depicted and more particularly described in Exhibit A to this Ordinance;
WHEREAS, in accordance with SDC 5.7.125(A) and ORS 222.111, the property owner of said territory
initiated the annexation action by submittal of the required application forms and petition for annexation
attached hereto as Exhibit B to this Ordinance;
WHEREAS, the territory proposed for annexation is within the Springfield Comprehensive Plan Urban
Growth Boundary and is contiguous to the City limits. (SDC 5.7.140(A));
WHEREAS, the annexation is consistent with the Springfield Comprehensive Plan— Urbanization
Element requiring annexation to the City of Springfield as the highest priority for receiving urban services;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Springfield has determined that the provision of City services
to the subject area is necessary to facilitate urban residential development;
WHEREAS, all required urban services are immediately available to serve the site and the applicant has
executed an Annexation Agreement (Exhibit C) that addresses the timing and financial responsibility for
provision of public facilities and services to the property;
WHEREAS, in accordance with SDC 5.7.150(A), upon annexation the Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District
UF-10) will cease to apply to the property and the underlying R-1 Residential District zoning will be
retained;
WHEREAS, a Staff Report (Exhibit D) was presented to the City Council with the Director's
recommendation to concurrently annex the subject territory to the Willamalane Park and Recreation
District, as this special district is a service provider for the City (SDC 5.7.140(B)), and to withdraw the
subject territory from the Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District as the Cities of Eugene and Springfield
will provide emergency response services directly to the area after it is annexed to the City;
WHEREAS, this action is consistent with the intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and
Springfield regarding boundary changes dated May 21, 2008; and
WHEREAS, on February 20, 2024, the Springfield Common Council conducted a public hearing and is
now ready to take action on this application based on the recommendation and findings in support of
approving the annexation request as set forth in the aforementioned Staff Report to the Council,
incorporated herein by reference, and the evidence and testimony presented at this public hearing held in
the matter of adopting this Ordinance,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1.The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby approve annexation of
the following described territory to the City of Springfield and Willamalane Park and Recreation District,
said territory being generally depicted and more particularly described in Exhibit A to this Ordinance.
Section 2.The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby approve withdrawal of
the following described territory from the Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District, said territory being
generally depicted and more particularly described in Exhibit A to this Ordinance.
Section 3.The City Manager or the Development & Public Works Director or their designee
shall send copies of this Ordinance to affected State and local agencies as required by SDC 5.7.155.
Section 4.Severability Clause. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion hereof.
Section 5.Effective Date of Ordinance. This Ordinance shall become effective on the day
following the general election, May 22, 2024, or upon the date of its filing with the Secretary of State as
provided by ORS 222.180, whichever is later.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield, this 4th day of March 2024,
by a vote of-for and 0 against.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 4th day of March 2024.
ref
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Recorder, Interim
REVIEWED&APPROVED
AS TO FORM
Kv't"via Kraal,_
DATE: TT L V
SPRINGFIELD CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit A
Page 1 of 3
Northstar
David Lee Schlosser Jr. - REGISTERED SURVEYOR
U R v E Y I N G 720 NW4t" Street, Corvallis, Oregon 97330 Phone 541-757-9050
Exhibit A
Legal Description for Annexation
A tract of land lying in the Northwest and Northeast Quarters of Section 4, Township 18 South, Range 2
West of the Willamette Meridian, City of Springfield, Lane County, Oregon. Being all of TRACT J, and a
portion of TRACT H and TRACT M of WOODLAND RIDGE PHASE 3, as platted and recorded on Instrument
Number 2023-00879, Lane County Deeds and Records, Lane County, Oregon, being more particularly
described as follows:
Beginning at a 5/8 inch rebar with yellow plastic cap marked "L.B. OLSON &ASSOC. PLS 655" lying on the
East line of Tract G of WESTWIND ESTATES, as platted and recorded on Clerk's Reception Number 2009-
070575, Lane County Deeds and Records, Lane County, Oregon, said point lying South 0°14'37" West
136.49 feet from a 5/8 inch rebar with yellow plastic cap marked "KPFF INC." marking the Northeast
corner thereof;Thence South 0°13'10" West 786.34 feet, more or less, (COURSE 1)to City Limits Line of
City of Springfield;Thence North 89°34'09" East 1112.04 feet, more or less (COURSE 2), to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING, being along the West line of Tract M of WOODLAND RIDGE PHASE 3, lying 37.00
feet North 00°04'22" West from the Northeast corner of LOT 151 of WOODLAND RIDGE PHASE 3;Thence
along the West line of said TRACT M South 0°04'22" East 137.00 feet, more or less to the Southeast
corner of LOT 151 of WOODLAND RIDGE PHASE 3, being also the Northeast corner of TRACT J of
WOODLAND RIDGE PHASE 3 (COURSE 3)Thence along the City Limits Line of City of Springfield; being
along the North line of TRACT J South 89°55'38" West 250.00 feet, more or less to the Northwest corner
of TRACT J, being also the Southwest corner of LOT 147, WOODLAND RIDGE PHASE 3 (COURSE 4)Thence
leaving said City Limits Line, South 21°29'07" West 89.00 feet, more or less to the North Right-of-Way
line of the Southern Pacific Railroad (COURSE 5);Thence along said North Railroad Right-of-Way line the
following five courses: (1)along the arc of a 5759.60-foot radius curve right(the chord of which bears
South 66°15'15" East 672.37 feet, more or less) 672.75 feet, more or less (COURSE 6); (2)Thence South
61°32'31" East 90.24 feet, more or less(COURSE 7); (3)Thence South 61°20'51" East 565.74 feet, more
or less(COURSE 8); (4)Thence South 60°01'46" East 241.90 feet, more or less (COURSE 9); (5)Thence
along the arc of a 1939.90-foot radius curve right (the chord of which bears South 52°31'28" East 350.74
feet, more or less) 351.22 feet, more or less (COURSE 10);Thence leaving said Railroad Right-of-Way
North 85°08'29" East 146.19 feet, more or less (COURSE 11);Thence South 28°09'41" East 29.53 feet,
more or less,to the centerline of Mt.Vernon Rd (COURSE 12);thence along said centerline, along an arc
of a 328.08 foot radius curve right (the chord of which bears North 73°31'10" East 132.85 feet, more or
less) 133.77 feet, more or less(COURSE 13); thence along said centerline North 85°12'02" East 61.92
feet, mor or less,to a point on the extension of the East line of TRACT M (COURSE 14);thence leaving
said centerline along the East line of TRACT M North 0°23'27" East 1498.92 feet, more or less to the
Northeast corner of TRACT M at the City Limits Line of City of Springfield (COURSE 15);Thence along said
City Limits Line the following three courses: (1)Along the North line of TRACT M South 89°55'38" West
Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit A
Page 2 of 3
391.51 feet, more or less to the Northwest corner of TRACT M (COURSE 16); (2)Thence along the
interior line and extension thereof of TRACT M South 0°01'15" East 374.55 feet, more or less (COURSE
17); (3)Thence South 89°59'33" West 1364.58 feet, more or less (COURSE 18) to the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Containing 36.31 acres, more or less
The Basis of Bearings for this description is per WOODLAND RIDGE PHASE 3, Lane County Survey File
Number 45939, Instrument Number 2023-008729, Lane County Deeds and Records.
REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYOR
OREGON
06/10/2014
DAVID LEE SCHLOSSER JR.
72617
RENEWAL DATE: 06130/2024
Ordinance No. 6474
Q.h
R
Eo
s A
J
W
o w a e ° 8 1 'IT_
9.
m a°-c° co,Z poLL
00
N om0000$
o$$00000$ooO1O==m m
m$ g`'d' $t
0 U i$O MMMmi ggi$Yin mm nm mrn•-8v8
s— t:: NNCI INNNNNNNNNNNNry NNNNNNNR`ImMMc'.NN o a'~
p
YK Y8438 Sa8S
f)BBB968
Cn
w a^
v'
gyp
IT-
lit
d i Q
c sw,.r woos- - O°,.; 00C
I; m Nm In,
o /
Z'— `\
M
I o
j'--
1
m I o
no 'PIP
6ywUX J_ ."O`''"."."`
I
0 0OOO WSp
to
0
O
N O
a Lo so I°
e I a3 9 a
gm
0000 atIl00000GC
rU II
om
si wa
Po
o...._A.w m7
o
000 1
wCD
r
w
Clm 01 W
o 00,
So-
Ur
se"„
w,.n., w m
C
m
too N w =o Ivo
z6 P tl .
w memo
M
tool
R
yQ \ \
w
N
a — z6 F
m
Z
wF$ i+
Qom '.
1
g
7
x
6-'n{ac n030P9000OtiE 090EO0AOB60AEJ0-90 :•_.-. OOCj606
og
IVI!\x
nmr .
Nn
Exhibit B
Page 1 of 8
City of Springfield S.PRINGFIELD
Development & Public Works 3
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Annexation Application Type 4
Application Type - Applicant: Check one)
Annexation Application Completeness Check:
Annexation Application Submittal: R3
Required • pr err rSection)
Property SSR Investments Phone:
Address: PO Box 2617, Eugene, OR 97402 E-mail:
Owner Signature:
Owner Signature:
Agent Name: Scott Morris Phone:
Company: A & O Engineering LLC Fax:
Address: 380 Q St Suite 200, Springfield, OR 97477 E-mail
Agent
Signature:
If the applicant is other than the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his or her behalf, except
where signatures of the owner of record are required, only the owner may sign the petition.
ASSESSOR'S MAP
18020400 3800 (portion), 3500NO: TAX LOT NOS :
Property Address: 5410 Mt Vernon Rd Springfield 97478; dear Mt Vernon
Area of Re uest: Acres: 36.1 Square Feet:
Existing Use: Vacant
Proposed Use:
Subdivision
Required Property InformationComplete Section)
x f
Reviewed
Case No.:
r ' J
J f ! -
Date: By:
initials-
Project No.: Placard:
Application
Fee:
Postage Fee: Total Fee:
Revised 04/17/2023 slm Page is o c lo. 6474
Exhibit B
Page 2 of 8
Owner Signatures
This application form is used for both the required completeness check meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process.
An application without the Owner's originaf signature will not be accepted.
Completeness Check
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct
and accurate for scheduling of the Completeness Check Meeting. If the applicant is
not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in
his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all
statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my
represent tive.
Owner:
Date:
Signature
II I o ., w)
Print
Submittal
I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check
performed on this application at the Completeness Check Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise
contained within the submittal,and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to acompleteapplication.
Owner:
Date: 2 z
Signature
to e VLA JN
Print
Revised 04/17/2023 slm Page
d nprfg No. 6474
Exhibit B
Page 3 of 8
FORM 2
OWNERSHIP WORKSHEET
This form is NOT the petition)
Please include the name and address of ALL owners regardless of whether they
signed an annexation petition or not.
OWNERS
Property Assessed Imp. Signed Signed
Designation Name of Owner Acres Value Y/ N Yes No
Map/lot number
18-02-04-00-03800 SSR Investments, LLC 26.9 610,436 x
18-02-04-00-03500 SSR Investments, LLC 9.5 0 x
18-02-04-00-03600 SSR Investments, LLC 0.1 +/- 0 x
TOTALS: 36.1 610,436
TOTAL NUMBER OF OWNERS IN THE PROPOSAL 1
NUMBER OF OWNERS WHO SIGNED 1
PERCENTAGE OF OWNERS WHO SIGNED 100
TOTAL ACREAGE IN PROPOSAL 36.1
ACREAGE SIGNED FOR 36.1
PERCENTAGE OF ACREAGE SIGNED FOR 100
TOTAL VALUE IN THE PROPOSAL 610,436
VALUE CONSENTED FOR 610,436
PERCENTAGE OF VALUE CONSENTED FOR 100
Revised 04/17/2023 slm 13 of 16
Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit B
Page 4 of 8
FORM 3
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
Complete all the following questions and provide all the requested information. Attach
any responses that require additional space, restating the question or request for
information on additional sheets.)
Contact Person: Jed Truett/Metro Planning, Inc
E-mail: jed@metroplanning.com
Supply the following information regarding the annexation area.
Estimated Population (at present): 0
Number of Existing Residential Units: 0
Other Uses:
Land Area: 36.1 total acres
Existing Plan Designation(s): Low Density Residential
Existing Zoning(s): LDR
Existing Land Use(s): Vacant
Applicable Comprehensive Plan(s): Eugene-Springfield Metro Plan
Applicable Refinement Plan(s):
Provide evidence that the annexation is consistent with the applicable
comprehensive plan(s) and any associated refinement plans. The comprehensive
plan and zoning are consistent with one another. Zoning will not change after
annexation.
Are there development plans associated with this proposed annexation?
r
Yes I No
If yes, describe.
Woodland Ridge Phases 4-8 are planned for these properties.
Is the proposed use or development allowed on the property under the current
plan designation and zoning?
Yes I_; No
Please describe where the proposed annexation is contiguous to the city limits
non-contiguous annexations cannot be approved under 5.7-140, Criteria).
The north portions of taxlot 3800 & 3600 are within city limits. Taxlot 3500 is adjacent to
to taxlots 1080423 5000, 5100, 5200, 5300, 5400 and 5700 which are all within city limits.
Revised 04/17/2023 slm Page 14 of 16
Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit B
Page 5 of 8
Does thisfapplication include all contiguous property under the same ownership?
Yes No
If no, state the reasons why all property is not included:
Check the special districts and others that provide service to the annexation area;
Glenwood Water District Rainbow Water and Fire District
Eugene School District Pleasant Hill School District
I] Springfield School District McKenzie Fire & Rescue
Pleasant Hill RFPD Willakenzie RFPD
EPUD SUB
0 Willamalane Parks and Rec District Other
Names of persons to whom staff notes and notices should be sent, in addition to
applicant(s), such as an agent or legal representative.
Jed Truett/ Metro Planning, Inc
Name)Name)
846 A Street
Address) Address)
Springfield, OR 97477
City) zip) City) zip)
Name)Name)
Address) Address)
City) zip) City) zip)
Revised 04/17/2023 slm Page 15 of 16
Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit B
Page 6 of 8
FORM 4
WAIVER OF ONE YEAR TIME LIMIT
FOR ANNEXATION PURSUANT TO ORS 222.173
This waiver of the time limit is for the following described property:
18020400 3800 and 3500 Mt Vemon Rd
Map and Tax Lot Number Street Address of Property (if address has been
assigned)
ONE WAIVER OF TIME LIMIT FOR EACH PARCEL, PLEASE
We, the owner(s) of the property described above understand the annexation
process can take more than one year but desire to annex to have City services.
Therefore, we agree to waive the one-year time limitation on this petition to
annex established by Oregon Revised Statutes 222.173, and further agree
that this contract shall be effective [ ] indefinitely or [ 3 until
Date
signatures of Legal Owners
Please print or qpe name Slar ature Date Si ned
1A31LLA4_ 1popc.9i P
LWG: l:WL1200MWLVVC"AMGE7R4NSrrIONV"Ui 77ONMRMSISPRINGFIEWVO-03-ML"MTWFMA1SVwx-sLaWTr/LLANNOGTfoMAAPLlCA71 1a-0r-Q9.D OCWtSaved: POy31=3
Revised 04/17/2023 sim Page 16 of 16
Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit B
Page 7 of 8
Woodland Ridge— Phases 5-8 Utility Narrative
Wastewater
The City of Springfield has an existing wastewater trunk line that runs through the property on the South
side in a public utility easement. This existing system will provide service stubs to the project at various
locations with new mainlines installed in rights of way to serve the individual house development.
This development is within the service basin for this existing trunk line, therefore this criterion is met.
Stormwater
The development will include the construction of multiple stormwater management facilities to serve
the project. The facilities will include a collection system (catch basins and mainlines) which will routed
to a series of detention and treatment ponds within the project area.
The stormwater run-off will be treated per requirements in the City of Eugene Stormwater Management
Manual that was adopted in the last Springfield code amendments as the standard.
Treated stormwater will then be detained within the ponds and metered out through outfall structures
to keep post-construction peak flow rates at or below the existing condition. The run-off will then be
routed to historic drainage path offsite.
Therefore,this criterion is met.
Water
Springfield Utility Board has provided a master water service plan for the development of all phases of
Woodland Ridge. The routing plan is prescriptive and will provide connection points at :
Holly Street(West End) - This has been constructed as part of Woodland Ridge phase 3.
South 51" Place (North) - This has been constructed as part of Woodland Ridge phase 3
Holly Street(East End) - Future connection to the existing facilities in Pinehurst Subdivision.
Pinehurst Street(East End)—Future connection to existing facilities in Pinehurst Subdivision
There is adequate water supply available to serve the proposed development, including the high level
service in phase 7. Therefore, this criterion is met.
Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit B
Page 8 of 8
Franchise Utilities
Sub Electric- There are existing electric utility connections at Holly Street(West& East), South 51" Place
North) and Pinehurst Street (East)to serve the proposed development. SUB electric has indicated
there is adequate capacity to serve this development.
Comcast Cable- There are existing cable utility connections at Holly Street (West& East), South 51'
Place (North) and Pinehurst Street (East)to serve the proposed development. Comcast has indicated
there is adequate capacity to serve this development.
NW Natural Gas -There are existing natural gas connections at Holly Street (West& East),South 511
Place(North) and Pinehurst Street (East)to serve the proposed development. NW Natural Gas has
indicated there is adequate capacity to serve this development.
Therefore,these criterion are met.
Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit C
Page 1 of 8
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
This Annexation Agreement("Agreement") is made between the City of Springfield, an
Oregon municipal corporation ("City") and SSR Investments LLC ("APPLICANT").
RECITALS
A. APPLICANT owns the parcel of land legally described in Exhibit A, the Property. The
property is proximate to the jurisdictional limits of the City and is subject to annexation by
the City of Springfield.
B. APPLICANT has submitted to the City a request for Annexation, dated December 14, 2023
for Assessor's Map No. 18-02-04-00, Tax Lot 03500 and portions of Tax Lots 03600 and
03800,which are not currently municipally addressed and are more particularly described in
Exhibit A.
C. APPLICANT wishes to annex the Property to the City and seeks support from the City for
the annexation.
D. The Property is inside the recognized Urban Growth Boundary of the City of Springfield.
The Property is within the Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District(UF-10) according to the
Springfield Zoning Map, and the underlying zoning is Low Density Residential (LDR).
E. Annexation of the Property requires a showing under SDC 5.7.140(C)that the Property can
be provided with the minimum level of key urban facilities and services as defined in Policy
31 of the Springfield Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element, and such showing is
supported by the substantial evidence in the record of the proceeding on this annexation.
City staff has determined the minimum level of key urban services is currently available to
the Property.
F. The purpose of this Agreement is to memorialize APPLICANT's and City's commitment
and agreement to the allocation of financial responsibility for public facilities and services
for the Property and other users of the facilities, sufficient to meet the City's requirements
for the provision of key urban services, including long term public sanitary sewer,
storm-water management systems, interconnected transportation systems, and Fire and Life
Safety services necessary for an affirmative City recommendation for the annexation
request.
After Recording,Return to: Place Bar Code Sticker Here:
City of Springfield
Attn: Current Development Division
Development& Public Works Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT—Page I of 8 Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit C
Page 2 of 8
G. A public sanitary sewer system with sufficient capacity to serve the Property and other
existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity of the Property is necessary to support a
finding that this key urban service is available to serve the Property.
The Jasper trunk sewer line is available along the southern boundary of this property.
Applicant is showing a proposed residential subdivision to be constructed on the
subject parcel that is a continuation of the existing Woodland Ridge residential
subdivision. This existing sanitary sewer trunk line was designed for the full urban
buildout of this area and has sufficient capacity for the proposed subdivision. The
applicant will be required to construct the local sewer main network as part of the
subdivision development.
H. A public stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to serve the Property and
other existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity of the Property is also necessary to
support a finding that this key urban service is available to serve the Property.
An existing public system of culverts and open channels exist that drain overland to
the south under the existing Southern Pacific Railroad line and Jasper Road that is
sufficient for the existing(predevelopment) conditions. The applicant will be
required to provide a stormwater drainage report and tentative design for collecting
and managing the increased runoff from the proposed subdivision showing no
increase in peak runoff from the existing conditions. The applicant will be required
to construct the local stormwater drainage system that provides quality treatment and
flow mitigation as outlined in the drainage report as part of the subdivision
development.
L An interconnected transportation system with the existing and proposed land uses in the
vicinity of the Property is also required in order to provide access and a transportation
system for the provision of Fire and Life Safety services to and from the annexed property.
The Property has legal and physical access to Holly Street to the west that was
constructed as part of the Phase 3 development of Woodland Ridge.
The future subdivision plan as provided by the applicant for this area shows roads to
be extended to the site boundaries on the east with connections to existing streets in
the Pinehurst subdivision as future phases of the Woodland Ridge subdivision
develop. These connections will be across an existing panhandle driveway for 5353
Ivy Street(TL 18-02-04-00-00307). The right to build these road connections and
related and necessary utility connections will need to be obtained prior to any
construction of Phases 5-8. The Holly Street connection is also required for the
City's Transportation System Plan (TSP)Project R-42 for any adjacent
developments to be completed in this area.
The Traffic Impact Analysis submitted for the subdivision shows the development
will increase traffic at the intersection of Bob Straub Parkway and Daisy Street that
will require installation of a traffic signal at that location. Lane County, City of
Springfield and the developer have all participated in planning and estimating the
cost of the needed signal and determined a proportional share of the cost that this
development is responsible for.
J. In order to facilitate orderly development of the Property and ensure the full provision of
key urban services that are satisfactory to the City and meet the City's conditions for an
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT—Page 2 of 8 Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit C
Page 3 of 8
affirmative recommendation for annexation to the Common Council, and in exchange for
the obligations of the City set forth below, APPLICANT shall comply with all requirements
imposed on APPLICANT in this Agreement.
Now, therefore based upon the foregoing Recitals,which are specifically made a part of this
Agreement, the parties agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. Obligations of APPLICANT. Consistent with the above Recitals, APPLICANT agrees to
perform the obligations set forth in this section.
1.1.1. APPLICANT or future property owner shall construct all internal roads, Holly Street
and any other streets (names have not been selected yet) shown on the approved
subdivision plans using the City's Public Improvement Project(PIP) process for any
approved subdivision that includes any part of the annexed area.
1.1.2. APPLICANT or future property owner will not commence any home construction
until the project has reached substantial completion, as defined by House Bill 2306.
1.1.3. APPLICANT or future property owner will construct the local sewer network within
the annexed area using the City's Public Improvement Project(PIP)process for any
approved subdivision that includes any part of the annexed area.
1.1.4. APPLICANT or future property owner will construct the local stormwater drainage
system within the annexed area using the City's PIP process for any approved
subdivision that includes any part of the annexed area in a way that does not increase
downstream runoff peak flow to the receiving facilities under the railroad and Jasper
Road.
1.1.5. APPLICANT or future property owner will obtain the right to make the required
utility and road connections to Pinehurst and Holly Streets from the current owners
at 5353 Mt Vernon Road.
1.1.6. APPLICANT or future property owner will improve the frontage along Mt Vernon
Road in the same construction phase that the road connection on Holly Street and
Pinehurst Street are made to the existing Pinehurst subdivision. These improvements
will be to current City of Springfield standards for a collector street including but not
limited to paving width, curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lighting and street trees.
1.1.7. APPLICANT or future property owner will pay to the City their share of the
improvement for the future traffic control device needed at the intersection of Bob
Straub Parkway and Daisy Street. This amount is determined at$135,000 and will
be due at the same phase the connection to Holly Street and Pinehurst Street are
made. The methodology used is summarized as follows and is based on an updated
vehicle trip analysis provided by Sandow Engineering on February 12, 2024:
In determining the applicant's fiscal "fair share"of a signal improvement, the
first step is to determine the minimum traffic volume an intersection receives to
justify or warrant signal installation. The minimum traffic volumes that warrant
a traffic signal are from the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices
MUTCD). The MUTCD has multiple different conditions and variables
associated with different traffic volumes which determine when signal
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT—Page 3 of 8 Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit C
Page 4 of 8
installations are warranted. For this application, the minimum volume that
warrants a signal is associated with the Eight-hour Vehicular Volume for a 2 lane
major roadway (Bob Straub Parkway) and one lane minor roadway (Daisy
Street). Because the major roadway has a posted speed of 40 mph or higher, the
traffic volumes from the 70%column of condition A from Table 4C-1 associated
with the Eight-hour Vehicular Volume warrant of the MUTCD was used. The
major roadway volume (420 vehicles) and minor roadway volumes (105
vehicles)from Table 4C-1 were combined to get the minimum traffic volume
525 vehicles)to warrant a signal. This annexation is for property contained
within Phases 5 through 8, which contribute 49 trips distributed to this
intersection,which is 9% of the 525 trips that warrant a signal. In consultation
with the applicant, a future construction cost associated with a standard signal
installation at this location was estimated at$1,500,000. The associated"Fair
Share"contribution associated with the annexation associated with Woodland
Ridge Phases 5 through 8 is 9% of the overall cost, which equates to $135,000.
1.1.8. APPLICANT or future property owner will extend the drinking water supply in each
construction phase from the current 8-inch and 12-inch water mains stubbed out at
Holly Street and Pinehurst Street in the Pinehurst Subdivision. Extension of the
water lines will allow for connection to the Level 2 pressure zone that is required to
serve Phases 5-8 and will facilitate water system looping to meet SUB Water
engineering standards.
1.2. APPLICANT shall provide and be financially responsible for the provision of any
additional urban facilities and services identified during the review and approval of any
Partition or Subdivision as necessary to serve the further development of the Property,
including the construction and maintenance thereof.
1.3. In determining APPLICANT's share of costs for the improvements described in this
Agreement, the proportional share of the cost for the provision of the improvements at the
time of annexation shall be used. For the purposes of this Agreement,the full cost shall
include design, construction, acquisition of land and/or easements, studies,permits from all
agencies having jurisdiction, attorney's fees, and all other costs reasonably associated with
the implementation of the needed improvements.
2. Obligations of City. Consistent with the above Recitals, City agrees to:
2.1 Process the annexation request and support annexation of the Property to the City before
the Common Council, and support APPLICANT's defense of any appeal of a decision to
the City. However, the City will not assume any financial responsibility to provide legal
counsel on appeal.
3. Covenants Running With the Land. It is the intention of the parties that the covenants herein are
necessary for the annexation and development of the Property and as such shall run with the
Property and shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, assigns, administrators, and successors
of the parties hereto, and shall be construed to be a benefit to and burden upon the Property.
This Agreement shall be recorded, at APPLICANT's expense, upon its execution in the Lane
County Deeds and Records. This Agreement may be assigned by APPLICANT and shall
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT—Page 4 of 8 Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit C
Page 5 of 8
benefit any assigns or successors in interest to APPLICANT. Execution of this Agreement is a
precondition to the support of the City for annexation of the Property described in Exhibit A to
the City. Accordingly,the City retains all rights for enforcement of this Agreement.
4. Limitations on the Development. No portion of the Property shall be further developed prior to
the approval of a Partition or Subdivision, as applicable, for the proposed development.
5. Mutual Cooperation. City and APPLICANT shall endeavor to mutually cooperate with each
other in implementing the various matters contained herein.
6. Waiver of Right of Remonstrance. APPLICANT agrees to sign any and all waivers,petitions,
consents and all other documents necessary to obtain the public facilities and services described
herein as benefiting the Property, under any Improvement Act or proceeding of the State of
Oregon, Lane County, or the City and to waive all rights to remonstrate against these
improvements. APPLICANT does not waive the right to protest the amount or manner of
spreading the assessment thereof, if the assessment appears to APPLICANT to be inequitable or
operate unfairly upon the Property. APPLICANT waives any right to file a written
remonstrance against these improvements. APPLICANT does not waive its right to comment
upon any proposed Local Improvement District(LID) or any related matters orally or in writing.
7. Modification of Agreement. This Agreement may only be modified in writing signed by both
parties. Any modifications to this Agreement shall require the approval of the Springfield
Common Council. This Agreement shall not be modified such that the minimum level of key
urban facilities and services as defined in Policy 31 of the Springfield 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Urbanization Element and as required herein are not provided in a timely manner to the
Property.
8. Land Use. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as waiving any requirements of the
Springfield Development Code or Springfield Municipal Code which may be applicable to the
use and development of this Property. Nothing herein shall be construed as City providing or
agreeing to provide approval of any building, land use, or other development application or
Land and Drainage Alteration Program (LDAP) permit application submitted by APPLICANT.
APPLICANT is responsible for obtaining, at APPLICANT's expense, all State and/or Federal
permits and any other approvals as may be required.
9. Dolan. APPLICANT knows and understands any rights it may have under the law as
interpreted in Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 US 374(1994) and subsequent cases interpreting the
legal effect of Dolan and by entering into this Agreement hereby waives any requirement that
the City demonstrate the public improvements and other obligations of APPLICANT, for
payments, financial responsibility and reimbursements set forth in Section 1, required herein,
are roughly proportional to the burden and demands placed upon the urban facilities and
services by the development and to the impacts of the development of the Property.
APPLICANT further waives any cause of action it may have pursuant to Dolan v. City of
Tigard and cases interpreting the legal effect of Dolan arising out of the actions described
herein.
10. Ballot Measures 37/49/ORS 195.300 et seq. APPLICANT knows and understands any rights it
may have under Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 195.300 et seq., "Just Compensation
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT—Page 5 of 8 Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit C
Page 6 of 8
for Land Use Regulation." APPLICANT for itself and its heirs, executors, assigns,
administrators and successors hereby waives any claim or cause of action it may have under
such ORS provisions against the City.
11. Invalidi1y. If any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed unenforceable or invalid, such
enforceability or invalidity shall not affect the enforceability or validity of any other provision
of this Agreement. The validity, meaning, enforceability, and effect of the Agreement and the
rights and liabilities of the parties hereto shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the
State of Oregon.
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT—Page 6 of 8 Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit C
Page 7 of 8
DATED this day of 20
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the APPLICANT and City have executed this Agreement as of the date
first herein above written.
APPLICANT
By: Date
Its:
STATE OF OREGON
COUNTY OF LANE SS
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME ON 520 BY
AS OF
APPLICANT)
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT—Page 7 of 8 Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit C
Page 8 of 8
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
By:
Nancy Newton, City Manager
STATE OF OREGON I SS
COUNTY OF LANE
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME ON 520 BY
AS OF
CITY)
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT—Page 8 of 8 Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit D
Page 1 of 8
SPRINGFIELD
TYPE 4 -ANNEXATION
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OREG,O
11111111111# lAAw1lI11111w1 1 1#
File Name: Woodland Ridge Annexation
Case Number: 811-23-000281-TYP4
Proposal Location: Vacant property at
5400 Mt Vernon Road and abutting
segment of public road right-of-way
Map 18-02-04-00,Tax Lot 3500 and
portions of Tax Lots 3600&3800) reFr e
Proposed for
Annexation
Current Zoning & Comprehensive
Plan Designation:
R 1/Low Density Residential(LDR)
Applicable Comprehensive Plan:
Springfield Comprehensive Plan
Application Submittal Date:
December 14,2023
Public Hearing Meeting Date: February 20,2024
Associated Applications: 811-23-000227-PRE (Development Initiation Meeting); 811-23-000253-PRE
Completeness Check Meeting)
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
POSITION REVIEW OF NAME PHONE
Project Manager Planning Andy Limbird 541-726-3784
Transportation Planning Engineer Transportation Michael Liebler 541-736-1034
Public Works Civil Engineer Streets and Utilities Clayton McEachern 541-736-1036
Deputy Fire Marshal Fire and Life Safety Gilbert Gordon 541-726-2293
Building Official Building Chris Carpenter 541-744-4153
Review Process(SDC 5.7.115): The subject annexation request is being reviewed under Type 4 procedures,without
Planning Commission consideration.
Development Initiation Meeting(SDC 5.7.120): A Development Initiation Meeting(DIM)is required of all public
agency and private landowner-initiated annexation applications,unless waived by the Director.
Finding: In response to the applicant's submittal,the City held a Development Initiation Meeting on October 24,
2023. Subsequently, a completeness check meeting for the annexation request was held on December 5,2023 (File
811-23-000253-PRE).
Conclusion: The requirement in SDC 5.7.120 is met.
Annexation Initiation and Application Submittal (SDC 5.7.125): In accordance with SDC 5.7.125(13)(2)(b)(i)
and ORS 222.170(1), an annexation application may be initiated by "more than half the owners of land in the
territory,who also own more than half the land in the contiguous territory and of real property therein representing
more than half the assessed value of all real property in the contiguous territory consent in writing to the annexation
Ordinance No.6474
Exhibit D
Page 2 of 8
of their land."
Finding: The property owner who owns all of the land and real property, and full assessed value of real
property in the contiguous territory, has filed an application and petition requesting annexation to the City of
Springfield (Attachment 2,Exhibit B).
Conclusion: The application requirements in SDC 5.7.125 have been met.
Site Information: The subject annexation area consists of an irregular-shaped property comprising approximately
36.1 acres. The property is bounded on the west and north by the Phase 3 and 4 subdivision areas of Woodland
Ridge, on the south by the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks and Jasper Road, and on the east by a linear panhandle
extension of an adjoining property (5353 Ivy Street). The property is vacant and was formerly used for livestock
grazing. Physical access to the site is provided via a stub of Holly Street where it terminates to the east of South 5 Ist
Place. The applicant has also installed a temporary construction access onto Mt Vernon Road at the southeast corner
of the property;however,this construction driveway will be removed when the property is developed with residential
dwellings. The subject property is inside the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary(UGB) and it is contiguous to
the City limits along the western,northern and northeastern boundaries. The purpose for annexing the property
is to facilitate phased subdivision of residential lots that comprise Phases 5 through 8 of the Woodland Ridge
neighborhood.
Current zoning for the property is R-I Residential District(R-1)with an Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District(UF-
10) applied. After annexation,the OF-10 overlay will be removed and the subject property will remain within the
R-1 Residential District.
Existing public services are provided to the annexation area as follows: police (Lane County Sheriff), schools
Springfield School District),roads(Lane County and City of Springfield),and Fire(Eugene-Springfield Fire under
contract with the Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District). Springfield Utility Board (SUB) provides electrical
and water service to incorporated areas of the Woodland Ridge neighborhood. There is no rural water district
providing service to this unincorporated area of Springfield. SUB Water has existing water lines within the Phase 3
and 4 subdivision areas along the western and northwestern boundary of the annexation area. SUB Water also has
facilities stubbed into Holly Street and Pinehurst Street within the Pinehurst neighborhood that lies just outside the
eastern boundary of the annexation area. In accordance with provisions of the Annexation Agreement,the developer
must provide for extension of public streets and utilities from the adjoining Pinehurst neighborhood to serve the
annexation area—specifically,the Woodland Ridge Phases 5 to 8 subdivision areas. Upon annexation,the City of
Springfield will be responsible for all urban services,including sanitary sewer,water and electricity(through SUB),
transportation and police/fire response to the subject area.
Notice Requirements (SDC 5.7.130): Consistent with SDC 5.7.130,notice was provided as follows:
Mailed Notice. Notice of the annexation application was mailed January 26,2024,which is more than 14 days prior
to the public hearing date to owners and occupants of properties located within 300 feet of the perimeter of the
proposed annexation territory; affected special districts and all other public utility providers; and the Lane County
Land Management Division, Lane County Elections, and the Lane County Board of Commissioners. The list of
recipients of the mailed notice is included with the Affidavit of Mailing for this annexation application and is retained
as part of the public record for Planning Case 811-23-000281-TYP4.
Newspaper Notice. Notice of the February 20, 2024 public hearing was published in the print version of The
Chronicle on February 8 and 15, 2024. The notification meets the requirements of SDC 5.7.130(B) for two
consecutive notices in the two-week period before the hearing.
Posted Notice. Notice of the February 20, 2024 public hearing was posted in four physical places in the City: on
the western edge of the annexation territory at the eastern terminus of Holly Street just past the intersection with
South 51"Place; on the southeastern edge of the annexation territory at the construction driveway onto Mt Vernon
Road; on the eastern edge of the annexation territory at the western terminus of Holly Street just past the intersection
with South 541h Street; and on the Public Notices bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall. The public hearing notice
Ordinance No.6474
Exhibit D
Page 3 of 8
was also digitally posted on the electronic display in the foyer of the Development&Public Works office and on
the City of Springfield website.
Conclusion: Notice of the public hearing was provided consistent with SDC 5.7.130.
Public Testimony Received. No telephone calls or written comments were received during the public notification
period that started with issuance of mailed notices on January 26, 2024 and extended through the period of February
19, 2024 when the City Council packet was published. At the public hearing meeting on February 20, 2024, one
person testified with concerns about rural fire district coverage due to potential shortages of staff and resources. Staff
confirmed at the public hearing meeting that the subject property would be within the Eugene-Springfield Fire
response area upon annexation to the City.
Recommendation to City Council (SDC 5.7.135): The Director shall forward a written recommendation on the
annexation application to the City Council based on the approval criteria specified in SDC 5.7.140, which are
provided as follows with the SDC requirements,findings,and conclusions. The Director's recommendation follows
SDC 5.7.140,Criteria.
Criteria(SDC 5.7.140): The application may be approved only if the City Council finds that the proposal conforms
to the following criteria:
A. The affected territory proposed to be annexed is within the City's urban growth boundary; and is
1. Contiguous to the city limits; or
2. Separated from the City only by a public right of way or a stream, lake or other body of water.
Finding: The subject annexation territory is located within the acknowledged urban growth boundary(UGB)of the
City of Springfield (see additional discussion in Subsection B below). The property requested for annexation is
contiguous with the City limits along portions of the western, northern and northeastern boundary. The proposal
meets the requirements of SDC 5.7.140(A)(1) for contiguity to the current City limits. Therefore, this annexation
application meets the statutory definition of contiguity as found in ORS 222.111(1).
Conclusion: The proposal meets and complies with Criterion(A)(1)of SDC 5.7.140.
B. The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in any applicable
refinement plans or Plan Districts;
Finding: The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC)in
August 1982 and has been subsequently amended. The original Metro Plan UGB encompassed both Eugene and
Springfield,with I-5 being the acknowledged boundary between Eugene and Springfield. With the passage of House
Bill 3337 in 2007 and adoption of Ordinance 6268 in 2011,a separate and distinct UGB was created for Springfield
using a tax lot by tax lot delineation. Springfield's UGB as delineated by Ordinance 6268 was subsequently
revised and expanded upon adoption of Ordinance 6361 in 2016. The revised and expanded UGB is delineated
on an individual tax lot basis and has been acknowledged by LCDC. Territory within the acknowledged UGB
ultimately will be within the City of Springfield.
Finding: In December 2016, Springfield adopted the Springfield Comprehensive Plan- Urbanization Element as a
component of Springfield's comprehensive plan in compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 14,Urbanization. The
Urbanization Element explicitly retains the Metro Plan's long-standing urbanization policy criteria for approving
annexations. The Urbanization Element has been acknowledged by LCDC.
Finding: The territory requested for annexation is within an area that is zoned R-1 which is consistent with the
comprehensive plan designation. The adopted elements of the Springfield Comprehensive Plan apply to areas
within the Springfield UGB,particularly the Urbanization Element adopted by Ordinance 6361. The Urbanizable
Fringe (UF-10) overlay will be effectively removed upon annexation. Following annexation, the applicant may
initiate phased subdivision of the property to facilitate construction of residential dwellings.
Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit D
Page 4 of 8
Finding: The continued annexation of properties to the City of Springfield is consistent with Policy 29 of the
Springfield Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element which specifies annexation as the preferred mechanism
for provision of urban services to properties within the UGB,which will result in the elimination of special districts
within the urbanizable area.
Finding: More detailed discussion of Public Facilities and Services in the Metro Plan(Section III-G)and the Eugene-
Springfield Public Facilities and Services Plan(PFSP)—a refinement plan of the Metro Plan—contemplates eventual
elimination of special service districts within each city's UGB as annexation occurs incrementally. Policy G.9 of
the Eugene-Springfield PFSP states that Eugene and Springfield and their respective utility branches,Eugene Water
Electric Board(EWEB)and Springfield Utility Board(SUB),shall ultimately be the water service providers within
their respective urban growth boundary. The requested annexation is consistent with this adopted policy.
Finding: The territory requested for annexation is currently within the service area of the Willakenzie Rural Fire
Protection District. The rural Fire District has a contractual service arrangement with Eugene-Springfield Fire
Department for provision of fire response to unincorporated areas of southeast Springfield. After the public hearing
and Council adoption of the annexation Ordinance, the annexation area will be withdrawn from the Willakenzie
Rural Fire Protection District consistent with ORS 222.520 and 222.524 and the City of Springfield will provide fire
and life safety services to the annexation area via the consolidated Eugene-Springfield Fire department.
Approval Standard: In accordance with Policy 33 of the Springfield Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element,
SUB is the exclusive water service provider within the Springfield city limits.
Finding: There is no rural water service district in this area of southeast Springfield. Therefore,upon annexation,
the City by and through the Springfield Utility Board will provide water service to the annexation area. Further,to
facilitate continued development of the Woodland Ridge neighborhood,the applicant and SUB must extend water
system facilities into the subject property from the adjoining Pinehurst neighborhood following annexation to
Springfield.
Finding: In accordance with Policy 34 of the Springfield Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element, when
unincorporated territory within the UGB is provided with any new urban service, that service shall be provided by
one of the following methods in this priority order: a)Annexation to City;or b) Contractual annexation agreements
with City.
Finding: In accordance with Policy 35 of the Springfield Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element, the City
shall not extend water or wastewater service outside City limits to serve a residence or business without first
obtaining a valid annexation petition,a consent to annex agreement,or when a health hazard abatement annexation
is required.
Finding: The requested annexation is to facilitate future subdivision of buildable lots and construction of residential
dwellings in the Phases 5 through 8 areas of Woodland Ridge. The site will require sanitary sewer service for planned
residential development and the Jasper Trunk sewer line runs along the southern boundary of the annexation area.
Because of the existing public sanitary sewer trunk line, this key service will be immediately available upon
annexation to the City-which is consistent with Policy 34. There is no proposal to extend sewer or water to a non-
annexed area. Further discussion about the water system is found in Section C below.
Conclusion: The proposal meets and complies with Criterion B of SDC 5.7.140.
C. The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key urban facilities
and services as defined in the Metro Plan can be provided in an orderly efficient and timely manner; and
Approval Standard: In accordance with Policy 29 of the Springfield Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element,
annexation shall continue to be a prerequisite for urban development and the delivery of City services in accordance
with the Springfield Comprehensive Plan and Springfield Development Code.
Approval Standard: In accordance with Policy 31 of the Springfield Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element,
key urban facilities and services are defined as wastewater service; stormwater service; transportation; solid waste
Ordinance No.6474
Exhibit D
Page 5 of 8
management; water service; fire and emergency medical services; police protection; citywide park and recreation
programs; electric service; land use controls; communication facilities; and public schools on a districtwide basis.
Approval Standard: In accordance with Policy 32 of the Sprineld Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element,
urban services provided by the City upon annexation to Springfield include storm and sanitary sewer, water;
transportation systems; police and fire protection; planning, building, code enforcement and library services; and
public infrastructure maintenance of City owned or operated facilities.
Finding: The territory requested for annexation is contiguous with the City limits line along the western,northern
and northeastern boundary. The proposal meets the contiguity requirements for the purpose of advancing this
annexation request. Urban utilities including water and electricity have been extended along the adjacent Holly
Street rights-of-way (to the east and west of the subject annexation area), the Pinehurst Street right-of-way (to the
east of the subject annexation area),and a sanitary sewer trunk line is already installed within the annexation area to
serve future residential subdivision phases. Therefore,the urban service delivery systems are already available and
in place or can be logically extended from points on the periphery to serve the subject property. The following
urban utilities,facilities and services are either available or can be extended to this annexation area:
Water — The Springfield Utility Board operates the public water utility system within incorporated areas of the
Westwind,Woodland Ridge,Pinehurst and other adjacent neighborhoods in southeast Springfield. As noted above,
SUB is the exclusive water service provider for properties within the City limits. Upon annexation, the subject
property will be eligible to receive SUB Water service. The annexation territory straddles the Level 1 and Level 2
pressure zones for the SUB Water system. To the west, l2-inch water lines have been installed within the Woodland
Ridge Phase 3 and 4 subdivision phases and the water lines are currently stubbed out to the edge of the annexation
area. The 12-inch water lines will be extended along Cedar View Drive and Holly Street as development proceeds
eastward. To the east, 8-inch and 12-inch water lines have been stubbed out at Holly Street where it terminates just
west of South 54'1i Street. Similarly, 8-inch and 12-inch water lines have also been stubbed out at Pinehurst Street
where it terminates just west of South 54t1i Street. Because of the transition to a new water system pressure zone,
extension of water lines from the adjacent Pmehurst neighborhood to the east will be required to facilitate further
residential development within the subject annexation area. Additionally,the extension of water lines from Pinehurst
will require the developer to obtain participation and/or concurrence from the owner of an intervening 20-foot wide
panhandle driveway that lies between the Pinehurst neighborhood and the annexation area. Provision for extension
of public utilities from the adjacent Pinehurst neighborhood is outlined in the Annexation Agreement for the subject
property.
Electricity — SUB owns and operates underground electrical transmission lines that have been stubbed out on the
eastern and western edges of the annexation area at Holly Street, Cedar View Drive and Pinehurst Street. Upon
annexation of the subject territory, electrical system facilities can be extended to serve future residential subdivision
phases of Woodland Ridge. Existing electrical system infrastructure within the public rights-of-way and easements
will continue to be maintained by the affected utility provider.
Police Services—Springfield Police Department currently provides service to areas of southeast Springfield that are
already inside the City limits. The annexation territory is currently within the jurisdiction of the Lane County
Sheriffs Department. Upon annexation, this area will receive Springfield Police services on an equal basis with
other properties inside the City.
Fire and Emergency Services—Fire protection is currently provided to the annexation area by Eugene-Springfield
Fire Department under contract with the Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District. Upon annexation,the property
will be withdrawn from the rural fire district and the Eugene-Springfield Fire Department will directly provide fire
and emergency services to the subject territory.
Emergency medical transport(ambulance) services are provided on a metro-wide basis by the Eugene-Springfield
Fire Department. The annexation area will continue to receive this service consistent with the adopted ambulance
service area (ASA) plan. Mutual aid agreements have been adopted by the three regional ASA providers to provide
backup coverage for each other's jurisdictions.
Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit D
Page 6 of 8
Parks and Recreation—Park and recreation services are provided within the City of Springfield by the Willamalane
Park& Recreation District. The park district operates several indoor recreation facilities, such as the Willamalane
Park Swim Center,Lively Park Swim Center,Bob Keefer Center for Sports and Recreation,and Willamalane Adult
Activity Center. The park district offers various after-school and other programs for children at schools and parks
throughout the community. Also available are pathways and several categories of parks,including community parks,
sports parks, special use parks,and natural area parks. The initial phases of the Woodland Ridge neighborhood abut
the former Weyerhaeuser haul road which has been converted to a linear park and multi-use pathway system.
The subject property is identified as a potential location for a new neighborhood park serving the Woodland Ridge
subdivision area(Project S17, Willamalane Comprehensive Plan). Annexation of the subject territory would be the
initial step in developing the site with urban uses including streets and utilities,residential dwellings, and park and
recreation facilities.
Concurrent with annexation to the City of Springfield,the subject property will be annexed to the Willamalane Park
Recreation District consistent with City policy, an intergovernmental agreement between the City of Springfield
and Lane County,and the adopted Willamalane Comprehensive Plan.
Library Services —Upon annexation to the City of Springfield, the subject area will be served by the Springfield
Public Library.
Schools — The Springfield School District serves this area of southeast Springfield. The Springfield School District
has capacity to serve the annexation area in its current configuration and as the Woodland Ridge neighborhood
continues to develop in the future. Approximately 135 residential lots would be created upon subdivision of the
annexation territory and it is expected that this will generate additional school-age population in the neighborhood.
The site is close to the future Jasper Natron school site off Bob Straub Parkway and Quartz Avenue. As residential
development continues to progress in southeast Springfield it will generate the need for additional and upgraded school
facilities.
Sanitary Sewer — The annexation territory contains a section of the existing Jasper Trunk sewer line. The trunk
sewer line is designed and sized to serve full buildout of residential, commercial and industrial-zoned properties
within the City's southeastern UGB. Currently, only a fraction of the sewer catchment area is annexed and
developed with urban uses that contribute flows to the sewer system. As such, the existing trunk sewer line has
sufficient capacity to accommodate domestic sewage flows from the entire Woodland Ridge Phases 3-8 area. The
draft Annexation Agreement prepared for the property includes provisions for connecting to the Jasper Trunk sewer
line (Attachment 2,Exhibit C).
Stormwater — The subject annexation territory is not currently served by a public Stormwater management system
although there are piped facilities that have been extended to the perimeter within Woodland Ridge Phases 3 and 4
and Pinehurst. There is currently nearly 100%pervious surface on the subject property because it is a grassy field.
With future residential development on the property the applicant will be required to manage Stormwater on the site to the
greatest extent possible,including provision for treatment and infiltration of runoff. Overflow to the public Stormwater
system may be allowable depending on the final on-site Stormwater system design prepared by the applicant and as
permitted under the City's Stormwater development regulations in effect on the date of submittal. Review and approval
of the proposed Stormwater system will be done in conjunction with future Public Improvement Project(PIP)processes
for construction of public streets and utilities necessary to serve the residential subdivision phases.
Streets—The western boundary of the subject annexation area abuts a stub of Holly Street, which is classified as
an urban collector street. The eastern boundary of the annexation area is proximate to another stub of Holly Street
within the Pinehurst subdivision. A stub of Pmehurst Street is also extended to a point near the southeastern
boundary of the annexation area. Subdivision and residential development of the subject annexation area is
predicated on extending public streets from points on or near the perimeter to provide interconnectivity of the street
system, secondary emergency access, and traffic balancing onto the City's street network. Extension of Holly
Street and Pinehurst Street westward from their current termination points near South 54th Street will require
concurrence and/or participation of the property owner of an intervening 20-foot wide panhandle driveway between
Pinehurst and the subject annexation area. Provision for extension of public streets necessary to serve the
Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit D
Page 7 of 8
annexation area is detailed in the Annexation Agreement for the property.
In addition to physical extension of existing public streets into the annexation area,the applicant will be responsible
for a proportional contribution to certain off-site transportation improvements. For the Woodland Ridge
neighborhood,traffic from the subdivision phases disperses onto the local transportation network including Daisy
Street and Bob Straub Parkway. The intersection of Daisy Street and Bob Straub Parkway has been identified as
requiring future improvements to accommodate increasing volumes of traffic, including vehicles from the
Woodland Ridge neighborhood. The intersection improvements could include reconfiguration into a roundabout
intersection,installation of traffic signals or other measures. Because Bob Straub Parkway is a Lane County facility
and Daisy Street is within Springfield's jurisdiction, these future intersection improvements will be jointly
coordinated between the two governments. The Annexation Agreement for the subject property,which constitutes
the Phases 5-8 area of Woodland Ridge, includes a formula for determining the developer's proportional share of
future off-site intersection improvements at the Daisy Street and Bob Straub Parkway intersection (Attachment 2,
Exhibit Q. The formula is based on the projected share of traffic from the Woodland Ridge neighborhood when
compared with total traffic volumes in the area. The proportional share used in the formula is based on traffic
volume calculations from the applicant's Traffic Impact Study for Woodland Ridge. Currently,there is no planned
or approved project for intersection improvements at Daisy Street and Bob Straub Parkway so the developer will
be satisfying their obligation through a monetary contribution to this future transportation project.
Solid Waste Mang ement—The City and Sa ipac have an exclusive franchise arrangement for garbage service inside
the City limits. Upon annexation,solid waste disposal service would be provided by Sampac.
Communication Facilities—Various providers offer both wired and wireless communication services in the Eugene-
Springfield metropolitan area. Existing providers and those entering the market have the capability to provide
service to this area.
Land Use Controls — The annexation area is within Springfield's urban growth boundary. Through an
intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and the City of Springfield,the City already has planning and
building jurisdiction for unincorporated areas of Springfield. The City will continue to administer land use controls
after annexation.
Finding: The minimum level of key urban facilities and services, as outlined in the Springfield Comprehensive
Plan Urbanization Element are available to the site, or there is sufficient capacity that will exist at the time of
development.
Conclusion: The proposal meets and complies with Criterion C of SDC 5.7.140.
D. Where applicable, fiscal impacts to the City have been mitigated through an Annexation Agreement or
other mechanism approved by the City Council.
Finding: The area proposed for annexation is a vacant property currently zoned for R-1 residential use. The subject
annexation area represents a"bridge"between the developed portions of Westwind and Woodland Ridge to the west
and the existing Pinehurst neighborhood to the east. Future subdivision and construction of the Phases 5-8 area of
Woodland Ridge will eventually provide a continuous extension of Holly Street from South 48t1i Street through to
South 55" Street. As discussed in Subsection C (above), because there will be anticipated off-site transportation
impacts the developer is responsible for a proportional share of future intersection improvements at Daisy Street and
Bob Straub Parkway. The amount of this contribution has been determined through a formula detailed in the
Annexation Agreement, which is an amount proportional to the development impacts of the proposed annexation.
Other provisions of the Annexation Agreement state the City and property owner's responsibilities for public
improvements,triggering actions,and requirements for provision of urban services to the site. The City and property
owner have not yet executed the Agreement and it is attached hereto for reference (Attachment 2,Exhibit Q.
Conclusion: Upon execution of the Annexation Agreement,the proposal will meet and comply with Criterion D
of SDC 5.7.140.
Ordinance No. 6474
Exhibit D
Page 8 of 8
City Council Decision (SDC 5.7.145): City Council approval of the annexation application shall be by
Ordinance.
Finding: The City Council gave first reading of the Annexation Ordinance and held a Public Hearing on February
20, 2024 for the subject annexation request. Based on the staff analysis and recommendations, and on testimony
provided at the Public Hearing, the City Council may now take action to approve, modify, or deny the Annexation
Ordinance at the regular meeting on March 4,2024.
Zoning (SDC 5.7.150): The area requested for annexation is zoned and designated R-1 Residential District in
accordance with the Springfield Zoning Map and the adopted Springfield Comprehensive Plan diagram. Properties
that are outside the City limits have the Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District(UF-10) applied to the zoning. Upon
the effective date of the annexation, the OF-10 overlay will be automatically removed and the property will
retain the R-1 zoning.
Effective Date and Notice of Approved Annexation (SDC 5.7.155): The subject annexation request was presented
to the City Council for consideration at a public hearing on February 20,2024. Second reading and potential adoption of
the annexation Ordinance is scheduled for March 4,2024. The anticipated date of Council adoption is within 90 days of
the upcoming May election. Therefore,the annexation and special district withdrawal will become effective on the day
following the upcoming general election (May 22, 2024), or upon acknowledgement of filing with the Secretary of
State—whichever date is later.
Withdrawal from Special Service Districts (SDC 5.7.160): Withdrawal from special districts may occur
concurrently with the approved annexation Ordinance or after the effective date of the annexation of territory to the
City. The Director shall recommend to the City Council for consideration of the withdrawal of the annexed territory
from special districts as specified in ORS 222. In determining whether to withdraw the territory, the City Council
shall determine whether the withdrawal is in the best interest of the City. Notice of the withdrawal shall be provided
in the same manner as the annexation notice in SDC 5.7.130.
Finding: The annexation area is within the delineated service territory of SUB Water and the Willakenzie Rural
Fire Protection District(contracted fire response). The Cities of Eugene/Springfield will directly provide fire and
emergency services after annexation. Consistent with SDC 5.7.160,notice was provided for the public hearing on
February 20, 2024. Withdrawal from the Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District concurrently with annexation
of the territory to the City of Springfield is in the best interest of the City and is supported by public testimony. The
withdrawal from the Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District is necessary to implement Policies 31 and 32 of the
Springfield Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element whereby annexation is prioritized for the City of
Springfield to provide urban services to its incorporated territory, and existing special service districts within the
City's UGB are to be dissolved over time.
DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The proposal complies with the annexation criteria of approval
listed in SDC 5.7.140,and Council is within its authority to approve annexation of the subject territory to the
City of Springfield and Willamalane Park and Recreation District and withdrawal of the subject territory
from the Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District.
Ordinance No. 6474