Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMeeting Packet Planner 4/9/2024 Completeness Check Meeting Development and Public Works Department Conference Room 616 & Zoom COMPLETENESS CHECK MEETING DATE: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 10:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. DPW Conference Room 616 and Zoom Completeness Check Mtg (Partition Tentative) #811-24-000095-PRE 811-24-000100-PROJ Sycan B Corp Assessor’s Map: 17-03-22-20 TL: 1600 Address: 3350 Gateway St. Existing Use: vacant/parking lot Applicant has submitted plans for 2-lot commercial partition Planner: Tom Sievers Meeting: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 10:00 – 11:00 via Zoom and Conference Rm 616 SITE VICINITY MAP 811-24-000095-PRE Completeness Check Meeting 17-03-22-20 TL 1600 3350 Gateway St. Sycan B Corp. Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10 City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Land Division Tentative Plan Partition, Subdivision Application Type (Applicant: check one) Partition Tentative Pre-Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Pre-Submittal: Partition Tentative Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Submittal: Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Applicant Name: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: Applicant’s Rep.: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: Property Owner: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO:TAX LOT NO(S): Property Address: Size of Property: Acres Square Feet Proposed Name of Subdivision: Description of Proposal: If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Existing Use: # of Lots/Parcels: Total acreage of parcels/ allowable density: Proposed # Dwell Units Signatures: Please sign and print your name and date in the appropriate box on the next page. Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: complete this section) Associated Applications: Signs: Pre-Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Postage Fee: $ TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: See Applicant's Rep See Applicant's Rep 840 Beltline Rd., Ste 202, Spfld, OR 97477 Jed Truett, AICP Metro Planning, Inc. (541) 302-9830 Sycan B Corp 17-03-22-20 840 Beltline Rd., Ste 202, Spfld, OR 97477 3350 Gateway St N/A Partition into two (2) parcels 2 N/A 846 A Street, Spfld, OR 97477 Vacant 2.65+/- Sycan B Corp N/A 1600 TENTATIVE PARTITION PLAN FOR SYCAN B CORP Submittal No. 1 Document Date: April 4, 2024 Proposal: Type II Tentative Partition Plan to create two (2) new parcels out of one (1) 3.99+/- acre parcel. Property Owner/ Applicant: Sycan B Corp 840 Beltline Rd., Ste 202 Springfield, OR 97477 Applicant’s Representative/ Planner/Project Coordinator: Jed Truett, AICP Metro Planning, Inc. 846 A Street Springfield, OR 97477 (541) 302-9830 Surveyor: Jered McGrath, PLS S & F Land Services 4905 Scholls Ferry Rd Bend, OR 97225 (503) 345-0328 Subject property: 17-03-22-20-01600 Site Address/ Location: 3350 Gateway St. Springfield, OR 97477 Zoning/ Designation: CC (Community Commercial)/ Commercial Total Property Size: +/- 2.65 AC Size Proposed Parcel 1: Size Proposed Parcel 2: +/- 1.19 AC +/- 1.45 AC WRITTEN NARRATIVE 1 Background This tentative partition application pertains to an approximately 2.65-acre parcel of land located at 3550 Gateway Street, within the City of Springfield city limits, identified as Assessor’s Map & Tax Lot 17-03-22-20-01600 (“subject property”). Parent zoning for the subject property is City of Springfield Community Commercial; Metro Plan designation is Commercial. The proposed land division will create two (2) new parcels – Parcel 1 is proposed at 1.19-acres; Parcel 2 is proposed at 1.45-acres. The subject property is currently vacant. No new development is proposed as a part of this Tentative Partition plan. This written statement intends to demonstrate the proposal’s compliance with applicable criteria and standards for Land Divisions under SDC 5.12.120 – Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements; and SDC 5.12.125 – Tentative Plan Criteria. Herein, Springfield Development Code (SDC) sections are indicated by bold and/or italic typeface; applicant responses follow in plain typeface. 5.12.120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements. A Tentative Plan application shall contain the elements necessary to demonstrate that the provisions of this code are being fulfilled. EXCEPTION: In the case of Partition applications with the sole intent to donate land to a public agency, the Director, during the Application Completeness Check Meeting, may waive any submittal requirements that can be addressed as part of a future development application. (A) General Requirements. (1) The Tentative Plan, including any required Future Development Plan, shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Professional Land Surveyor on standard sheets of 18 inches x 24 inches. The services of an Oregon Licensed Professional Engineer may also be required by the City in order to resolve utility issues (especially stormwater management, street design and transportation issues), and site constraint and/or water quality issues. Response: The Tentative Partition Plan has been prepared by Jered McGrath, PLS an Oregon Licensed Professional Land Surveyor of S & F Land Services and is included with this submittal on standard sheets of 18” x 24”. (2) The scale of the Tentative Plan shall be appropriate to the area involved and the amount of detail and data, normally 1 inch = 50 feet, 1 inch = 100 feet, or 1 inch = 200 feet. Response: A scale of 1”:50’ is used on the Tentative Plans. (3) A north arrow and the date the Tentative Plan was prepared. Response: A north arrow and date of plan preparation are included on the Tentative Partition Plans included with this application. (4) The name and address of the owner, applicant, if different, and the Land Surveyor and/or Engineer who prepared the Partition Tentative Plan. Response: Owner/Applicant is Sycan B Corp. Surveyor who prepared the Tentative Partition Plan is Jered McGrath, PLS an Oregon Licensed Professional Land Surveyor of S & F Land Services. (5) A drawing of the boundaries of the entire area owned by the partitioner or subdivider of which the proposed land division is a part. Response: On the Tentative Partition Plan, a thicker black line is drawn around the subject property to easily show the boundaries of the subject property. 2 (6) City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way, which cross or abut the proposed land division. Response: There are no special service district boundaries, city boundaries, or railroad rights-of-way that cross or abut the proposed partition. (7) Applicable zoning districts and the Metro Plan designation of the proposed land division and of properties within 100 feet of the boundary of the subject property. Response: The applicable zoning district and Metro Plan designation of the subject property and surround properties within 100 feet are indicated on the tentative plan. (8) The dimensions (in feet) and size (either in square feet or acres) of each lot/parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site, where applicable, and the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale. Response: Dimensions and sizes for each proposed lot are indicated in square feet and/or acres on the attached Tentative Partition plans. (9) The location, outline to scale and present use of all existing structures to remain on the property after platting and their required setbacks from the proposed new property lines. Response: The subject property is currently vacant. (10) The location and size of existing and proposed utilities and necessary easements and dedications on and adjacent to the site, including, but not limited to, sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Response: All utilities are existing and indicated on the Existing Conditions site plan; connection points will be addressed at time of final partition plat. (11) The locations, widths and purpose of all existing or proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division; the location of any existing or proposed reserve strips. Response: The locations of existing and proposed public and private utility easements are indicated on the Tentative Partition plan set. (12) The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated. Response: At this time, no additional areas are planned to be dedicated or reserved for public use. (B) A Site Assessment of the Entire Development Area. The Site Assessment shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer and drawn to scale with existing contours at 1-foot intervals and percent of slope that precisely maps and delineates the areas described below. Proposed modifications to physical features shall be clearly indicated. The Director may waive portions of this requirement if there is a finding that the proposed development will not have an adverse impact on physical features or water quality, either on the site or adjacent to the site. Information required for adjacent properties may be generalized to show the connections to physical features. A Site Assessment shall contain the following information. (1) The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) Map on file in the Development and Public Works Department; Response: There are no watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses Map that encumber the subject property. 3 (2) The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision; Response: According to FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 41039C1133F, Community No. 039C, the subject property is located in a Zone X area, determined to be outside of the 500-year floodplain. (3) The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3.200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development and Public Works Department; Response: According to the Wellhead Protection Map, the subject property falls outside the Time of Travel Zone for wellhead protection. (4) Physical features including, but not limited to significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings; Response: There are no significant physical features such as clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands, or rock outcroppings located within the boundaries of the subject property. (5) Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; and Response: The USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey indicates that the soil types covering the subject property consists of 72% (76) Malabon-Urban Land Complex and 28% (32) Coburg-Urban Land Complex. See attached USDA Web Soil Survey soil types and water table information. (6) Natural resource protection areas as specified in SDC 4.3.117. Response: There are no natural resource protection areas present on the subject property. (C) A Stormwater Management Plan drawn to scale with existing contours at 1-foot intervals and percent of slope that precisely maps and addresses the information described below. In areas where the percent of slope is 10 percent or more, contours may be shown at 5-foot intervals. This plan shall show the stormwater management system for the entire development area. Unless exempt by the Director, the City shall require that an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer prepare the plan. Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect may also be required. The plan shall include the following components: (…) Response: At this juncture no Stormwater Management Plan is designed for the subject property as no development is proposed as a part of this tentative partition plan. (D) A response to transportation issues complying with the provisions of this code. (1) The locations, condition, e.g., fully improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, AC mat, or gravel, widths and names of all existing streets, alleys, or other rights-of-way within or adjacent to the proposed land division; Response: The attached Existing Conditions site plan indicates the names, locations, and conditions of the existing streets adjacent to the subject property. (2) The locations, widths and names of all proposed streets and other rights-of-way to include the approximate radius of curves and grades. The relationship of all proposed streets to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan or Springfield Comprehensive Plan, including the Springfield Transportation System Plan (including the Conceptual Street Map) and, any approved Conceptual Development Plan; Response. No new development, streets or rights of way are proposed with this tentative partition plan. 4 (3) The locations and widths of all existing and proposed sidewalks, multi-use paths, and accessways, including the location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip; Response: There are no existing sidewalks, multi-use paths, accessways, or planter strips; none are proposed. (4) The location of existing and proposed traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities, where applicable; Response: The above are indicated on the attached Existing Conditions Sheet, as applicable. (5) The location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways demonstrating conformance with lot or parcel dimensions and frontage requirements for single-family and duplex lots/parcels established in SDC 3.2.215, and driveway width and separation specifications established in SDC 4.2.120, where applicable; Response: No single-unit or duplex lots/parcels are proposed as a part of this tentative partition plan; therefore, driveway locations (existing or proposed) need not demonstrate conformance with lot/parcel dimensions and frontage requirements for single-unit and duplex lots/parcels, driveway width and separation specifications. (6) The location of existing and proposed street trees, associated utilities along street frontage(s), and street lighting: including the type, height and area of illumination; Response: Existing streetlights as applicable are shown on the tentative partition plan. (7) The location of existing and proposed transit facilities; Response: The closest transit facility is located on nearby Kruse Way. (8) A copy of a Right-of-Way Approach Permit application where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility; and Response: The subject property has frontage on Beltline Road, an ODOT roadway, however access for the parent parcel, and subsequently both proposed Parcel 1 and proposed Parcel 2, is taken from Gateway Street via an existing access point. (9) A Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Oregon Licensed Traffic Engineer, where necessary, as specified in SDC 4.2.105(A)(4). Response: A Traffic Impact Study is not necessary as no development is proposed with this tentative partition plan. (E) A Future Development Plan. Where phasing and/or lots/parcels that are more than twice the minimum lot/parcel size are proposed, the Tentative Plan shall include a Future Development Plan that: (1) Indicates the proposed redivision, including the boundaries, lot/parcel dimensions and sequencing of each proposed redivision in any residential district, and shall include a plot plan showing building footprints for compliance with the minimum residential densities specified in SDC 3.2.205; (2) Addresses street connectivity between the various phases of the proposed development based upon compliance with the Springfield Transportation System Plan (including the Conceptual Street Map), the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), applicable Refinement Plans, Plan Districts, Master Plans, or this code; (3) Accommodates other required public improvements, including, but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity; (4) Addresses physical features, including, but not limited to, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map and their associated riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings and historic features; and 5 (5) Discusses the timing and financial provisions relating to phasing. Response: Proposed parcels exceed 12,000 square feet, however, at this time a Future Development Plan is not feasible as the development of this commercially zoned property will be required to obtain separate land use and/or building and development permits. (F) Additional information and/or applications required at the time of Tentative Plan application submittal shall include the following items, where applicable: (1) A brief narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed land division and the existing use of the property; Response: This written statement serves as the narrative describing the proposal in detail. (2) If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required; Response: The applicant, Sycan B Corp, is the property owner. (3) A Vicinity Map drawn to scale showing bus stops, streets, driveways, pedestrian connections, fire hydrants, and other transportation/fire access issues within 200 feet of the proposed land division and all existing Partitions or Subdivisions immediately adjacent to the proposed land division; Response: The attached Tentative Partition Plan - Existing Conditions sheet includes the above required vicinity map details. (4) How the Tentative Plan addresses the standards of any applicable overlay district; Response: No overlay districts apply to the subject property. (5) How the Tentative Plan addresses Discretionary Use criteria, where applicable Response: The proposed 2-Lot tentative partition within the CC zone is a permitted use according to SDC 3.2-210. No Discretionary Use Permit is required. (6) A Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19.100; Response: No trees will be felled as a result of this Tentative Partition Plan. (7) A Geotechnical Report for slopes of 15 percent or greater and as specified in SDC 3.3.500, and/or if the required Site Assessment in SDC 5.12.120(B) indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or high water table as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; Response: There are no slopes greater than 15% on this site. Soils are not classified as unstable and water table is not high; a site assessment is not required. (8) An Annexation application as specified in SDC 5.7.100 where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within City’s urban growth boundary and can be serviced by sanitary sewer; Response: The subject property is within the City of Springfield city limits. (9) A wetland delineation approved by the Department of State Lands shall be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property; Response: There are no wetlands on the subject property. 6 (10) Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved shall be submitted concurrently; Response: No Federal or State permits are required with this tentative Partition application. (11) All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing; Response: There are no public improvements proposed. The tentative partition is funded with private financing resources. (12) Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of a Homeowner’s Association Agreement, where appropriate; Response: No deed restrictions or Homeowner’s Association Agreements are proposed at this juncture. (13) Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the Director may waive certain submittal requirements specified in subsections (A) through (M). However, the Tentative Plan shall address the applicable standards listed under the park Subdivision approval criteria specified in SDC 5.12.125. Response: This application does not pertain to the subdividing of a manufactured dwelling or mobile home park. 7 5.12.125 Tentative Plan Criteria. The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that all applicable criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to a public agency, the Director may waive any approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future development application. (A) The request conforms to the provisions of this code pertaining to lot/parcel size and dimensions. Response: The applicant’s request to subdivide the subject property’s approximately 3.99 acres into two (2) lots conforms with all provisions and mandatory minimum development standards for City of Springfield CC zoned properties. Development standards for the subject property, located in the Community Commercial zone, are addressed below. SDC 3.2.325. Development Standards. In addition to applicable provisions contained elsewhere in this code, the development standards listed in this section apply to all development in commercial districts. In cases of conflicts in this section between the general standards and the area- specific standards, the area-specific standards apply. (A) Lot Area, Dimensions, and Coverage. The following Table 3.2.325(A) sets forth the commercial district lot area, lot dimension, and coverage standards. Response: The proposed tentative partition complies with the development standards specified in SDC 3.2.325. Development standards for the Community Commercial zone are addressed below in Table 1.0 – CC Development Standards: Table 1.0 – CC Development Standards SDC 3.2.325(A) Area Minimum Frontage Coverage CC Zone Standards 6,000 Sq Ft Standard: 50 Feet Panhandle: 40 Feet Limited Only by Specified Use Standards Proposed Parcel 1 1.19 Acres/ (51,836 Sq Ft) 104 Feet Vacant – no use proposed at this time Proposed Parcel 2 1.45 Acres/ (63,162 Sq Ft) 157 Feet Vacant – no use proposed at this time (1) The frontage standard does not apply when the following are met: (a) The lots/parcels have been approved as part of a Master Plan, Site Plan, Subdivision, or Partition application; and (b) Access has been guaranteed via a private street or driveway by an irrevocable joint use/access agreement as specified in SDC 4.2.120(A). Response: Frontage standards apply and are addressed in Table 1.0 – CC Development Standards. The proposed tentative partition plan complies with frontage requirements. (B) Setbacks. (C) Height. Response: The setback and height requirements contained in SCD 3.2.325 do not apply to this proposal as the property is currently vacant of all buildings. 8 (B) The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Response: The subject property is zoned CC (Community Commercial) in the City of Springfield, which is in accordance with the Metro Plan designation. (C) Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this code and other applicable regulations. The Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Response: No development is proposed; capacity requirements will be addressed at time of potential future development. (D) The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this code and other applicable regulations. Response: This proposed 2-lot partition shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this SDC criteria, and all other applicable regulations. All existing public and private facilities will meet the design and construction standards of the SDC. (E) Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas; other riparian areas and wetlands specified in SDC 4.3.117; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in SDC 3.3.900 or ORS 97.740.760, 358.905.955 and 390.235.240, shall be protected as specified in this code or in State or Federal law. Response: Physical features as relevant are included on the attached Existing Conditions site plan. (F) Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. Response: No new parking areas or ingress-egress points are proposed as part of this tentative partition application. (G) Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished as specified in this code. Response: Development of any remainder of the subject property owned by Sycan B Corp can be accomplished in compliance with the Springfield Development Code. (H) Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its development as specified in this code. Response: Adjacent land either is, or can be, developed. (I) Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the City’s urbanizable area and no concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards specified below shall also apply. (1) The minimum area for the partitioning of land in the UF-10 Overlay District shall be 10 acres. (2) EXCEPTIONS: 9 (a) Any proposed new parcel between 5 and 10 acres shall require a Future Development Plan as specified in SDC 5.12.120(E) for ultimate development with urban densities as required in this code. (b) In addition to the standards of subsection (I)(2)(a), above, any proposed new parcel that is less than 5 acres shall meet 1 of the following standards: (i) The property to be partitioned shall be owned or operated by a governmental agency or public utility; or (ii) A majority of parcels located within 100 feet of the property to be partitioned shall be smaller than 5 acres. (iii) No more than 3 parcels shall be created from 1 tract of land while the property remains within the UF-10 Overlay District. EXCEPTION: Land within the UF-10 Overlay District may be partitioned more than once as long as no proposed parcel is less than 5 acres in size. Response: The subject property is within the City of Springfield city limit; this criterion is not applicable. (J) Where the Partition of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the following approval criteria apply: (…) Response: This proposal does not include a manufactured dwelling park/mobile home park; this criterion is not applicable.