Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication Applicant 3/29/2024Revised 1/7/14 kl 3 of 10 Land Division Tentative Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Land Division Tentative Application for Pre-Submittal  The application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet.  A pre-submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre-submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon.  Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre-submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre-Submittal Meeting  The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre- submittal meeting.  The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall’s office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes.  The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre-Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision  A complete application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet.  A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.  Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property.  There is a 14-day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed.  Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice.  Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.  At the applicant’s request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision.  The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed.  The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/7/14 kl 4 of 10 Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE:  ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre-Submittal and Submittal.  If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. Application Fee – refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre-submittal and submittal stages. Land Division Tentative Application Form Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. Density - list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. Copy of the Deed Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. Copy of the Land Division Plan Reduced to 8½”x 11”, which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. Right-of-Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City’s transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre-Submittal OR Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets: All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. All plan sets must be folded to 8½” by 11” and bound by rubber bands. a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Revised 1/7/14 kl 5 of 10 Vicinity Map The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use and required setbacks from proposed property lines. The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5” in diameter or greater when measured 4 ½ feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table b. Land Division Tentative Plan Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and area of illumination Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division. Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map. Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways Location of existing and proposed transit facilities Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip Revised 1/7/14 kl 6 of 10 Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as specified in SDC 5.12-120 E. c. Stormwater Management Plan Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill Additional Materials That May be Required IT IS THE APPLICANT’S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner’s Association Agreement Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230 Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Revised 1/7/14 kl 7 of 10 Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City’s urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing December 6, 2013 REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY: In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial “stormwater scoping sheet,” provided to help engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of decisions. As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process. Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet, which reflects changes requested by the development community. PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS DIRECTIONS FOR USING STORMWATER SCOPING SHEETS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location. 2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study. (Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.) 3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Attn: Clayton McEachern. 4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete stormwater study. 5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study. Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter) as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: http://www.springfield- or.gov/DPW/EngineeringandConstructionResources.htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Forms section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process. Sincerely, Clayton McEachern, PE City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Email: cmceachern@springfield-or.gov Phone: (541) 736 – 1036 Fax: (541) 736 – 1021 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX: 541.736.1021 www.springfield-or.gov Return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachern@springfield-or,gov, FAX: (541) 736-1021 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX: 541.726.1021 www.springfield-or.gov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK Project Name: Applicant: Assessors Parcel #: Date: Land Use(s): Phone #: Project Size (Acres): Fax #: Approx. Impervious Area: Email: Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor’s map): Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, UH may be substituted for Rational Method) Small Site Study – (use Rational Method for calculations) Mid-Level Development Study – (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Full Drainage Development Study – (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: Wellhead Zone: Hillside Development: Wetland/Riparian: Floodway/Floodplain: Soil Type: Other Jurisdictions Downstream Analysis: N/A Flow line for starting water surface elevation: Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: --------------------------------- (Area below this line filled out by the City and Returned to the Applicant) ---------------------------- (At a minimum, all boxes checked by the City on the front and back of this sheet shall be submitted for an application to be complete for submittal, although other requirements may be necessary.) ------------------------------------------------- (Area below this line filled out by Applicant) -------------------------------------------------- (Please return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield Development and Public Works; Fax # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036), email:cmceachern@springfield-or.gov Form Version 5: June 2015 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS * Based upon the information provided on the front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is needed for an application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) or the City’s Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site approval; Additional site specific information may be required. Note: Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completed form has been signed in the space provided below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3) Req’d N/A All non-building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. Where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual. For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (Sec2.4.1). If a stormwater treatment swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene’s Stormwater Management Manual. Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. General Study Requirements (EDSPM Section 4.03) Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. Calculations showing system capacity for a 2-year storm event and overflow effects of a 25-year storm event. The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review of Downstream System (EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C) A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. Manning’s “n” values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well. Other/Miscellaneous Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another. Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to the website: http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/uic/uic.htm for more information. Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre-development rates for the 2 through 25-year storm events. *This form shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, of the stormwater study. For Official Use Only: As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study and plan set. Signature Date . * IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW AND SIGN! TENTATIVE MAP NARRATIVE March 21, 2024 Assessor’s Map: 17-03-26-31 Tax Lot 900 Applicants: Monkey Hero, LLC (541) 896-0408 Applicant’s Representative: The Favreau Group 3750 Norwich Ave. Eugene, OR 97408 541-683-7048 Attn: Tony Favreau LAND USE REQUEST The applicant proposes to divide the subject 0.49 acre property to create 6 lots and to provide all necessary infrastructure to support the development. The proposed residential use and density (6-14 dwelling units/acre) are consistent with the existing Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning and the City’s standards for development in the LDR zoning district, where a maximum of 14 dwelling units/acre is permitted and the proposed is 12.3 units per acre. The proposal does not include any improvements to 5th Street or Moffit Ln. SITE AND SURROUNDING CHARACTERISTICS The site is within an established Springfield residential neighborhood. The property is located at 1620 5th St. and has an existing home situated towards the front of the property. The Northern property line abuts a drainage channel, the Western property line abuts Hamlin school. The Southern and Eastern property lines abut Moffit Lane and 5th Street respectively. The site soils are 2224A Courtney Gravelly Silty Clay Loam and #119 Salem-Urban Land Complex, soil group D. 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that all applicable criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to a public agency, the Director may waive any approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future development application. A. The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel size and dimensions. Response: There are no lot minimum sizes or dimensions. B. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Response: The property is zoned Low Density Residential (LDR). The Metro Plan diagram for the subject property is LDR. C. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Response: a. Water: The proposed development is within the Springfield city limits and will receive water service from the Springfield Utility Board (SUB). There is an existing 16” waterline and 12” waterline in Moffit Lane. b. Wastewater: There are 2 existing 8” wastewater systems. One in 5th St. and one I Moffit Lane. c. Storm Drain: Runoff from the site will be piped into a proposed filtration planter. The planter will discharge to an existing drainage ditch to the west. d. Streets: 5th Street and Moffit Lane are fully built and no improvements are proposed. D. The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. Response: See Response to part C. E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas; other riparian areas and wetlands specified in Section 4.3-117; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. Response: The Metro Area General Plan, Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map, State Designated Wetlands Map, Hydric Soils Map, Wellhead Protection Zone Map, FEMA Maps, and the list of Historic landmark sites have been consulted and with the exception noted below, there are no features needing to be protected or preserved on this site. If any artifacts are found during construction, there are state laws that could apply; ORS 97.740, ORS 358.905, ORS 390.235. If human remains are discovered during construction, it is a Class “C” felony to proceed under ORS 97.740. The site is relatively level and drains to the north. The onsite driveway runoff will be treated via pervious pavers. The houses on each parcel will have individual treatment facilities on each parcel. Criterion 6 is met. Physical features, including but not limited to significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings, and historic features are not present on the site. F. Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. Response: 5th Street and Moffit Lane are fully built and no improvements are proposed. G. Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished as specified in this Code. Response: There is no other adjoining property under the same ownership that can be developed. H. Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its development as specified in this Code. Response: There is no undeveloped land adjoining the property. Approval of the proposed subdivision will not impede development of adjacent land. I. Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the City’s urbanizable area and no concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards specified below shall also apply. Response: This does not apply. pill I M1 MimiP -PP •FBrNrYP°� mpi6P'N N 0 4v- fig alls I PV THE FAVREAU GROUP CIVIL ENGINEERING y'^ 4 filONORMHAVE BIOlIIE.ORST40 ("Dolma TAX MAP LOTS Ma 21. 2024 - 11:05an 17 -03 -20 -T -M KINGLET COURT CITY OF SPRINGFIELD PIIOC WORKS OEPARIWIW w zo U a p m Q o a I FLOOD CHANNEL u1zs.TD' GRAPHIC SCALE R=1om.00 N 69'957W 31.63' 31.63' L=W.IB � L=04.92 I me neo A a° ax LoT s a 13 iP. x 5 5 BP. o EASEMENTSeNO $ 7Z62D rMsnxc Q D NG PUBLIC SIDE— EASEMENT PER DOCOMENT NO. 88-26100 xausE - 0 NENNN e x EASEMENT PER REON NO. 326, BLANKET IN NATURE AND NOT SHORN QB EXISTING PUBUC SEYfiA EASEC Q PROPOSED 7'1TDE PUBUC UALI7 EASEMENT $ TL 2200 I Q PROPOSED 25' MDE PRIVATE ACCESS AND UTUTY EASEMENT 2 S N Q PROPOSED MON gfMANCE EASEMENT 3,221 S.E. Q PROPOSE, NOA— EASEMENT QG PROPOSED 2' 11 PUBUC UTUTY EASEMENT W ® PROPOSED 5' N1DE ORDRAINAGE EASEMENT $ _ 118.6' 60.15' 1,291 SP. _ i 6 E 3.]90 GR �� LU — GEG- OLYMPIC ST. <� 5 693615 E 1"OG' 0 TL 901p TL1000 MOFFIT LN.REGISTERED gRORE55RI0NAL L DSU K vlE0. eo c OREGON 5, 2003 TL 1100 i�irr'ea�rs I X512 3 RENEWS: 12-31-2025 SHEET 2 OF 3 41IN Z O 3 r ill s 00 000 0000000 0000 o , 9- 9 0 C] � � 'f'� a _ g o � o � � � �➢ � d � � o HN2 0 A g m m = Y g s9 v v9 0 m� J r EA 'tom W EXISTING 5' NDE SIDEWALK 141.00 IX GAS - IX CURB & GU Q 5TH ST._ I -IX CURB k GUi1ER I tfi W TREAU GROUP GRADING AND PIAN HE FAV CIVIL ENGINEERING Y �o elaaSM NOAV" AVL lcaemVlleeeaoa KINGLET COURT TAX MAP LOTS CITY OF SPRINGFIELD B p�g0(y�g ITR 21, 2024 - 11:04- 17 -03 -20 -T -M PlbuC Naecs DEPNt11INT moos zo z� E_ > g pig qT 4 W TREAU GROUP GRADING AND PIAN HE FAV CIVIL ENGINEERING Y �o elaaSM NOAV" AVL lcaemVlleeeaoa KINGLET COURT TAX MAP LOTS CITY OF SPRINGFIELD B p�g0(y�g ITR 21, 2024 - 11:04- 17 -03 -20 -T -M PlbuC Naecs DEPNt11INT