The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication Applicant 1/10/2024City of Springfield SPRINGFIELD Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Initiation Meeting (DIM) Prospective Dehoti LLC/Hamid Madani See agent Applicant Name: Phone: g Company: Dehoti, LLC E-mail: See agent Address: PO Box 40008, Eugene, OR 97404 Ap_plcantt'seRep._Jed Truett/Kim O'Dea Phone:541-302-9830 Company: Metro Planning/LDL E-mail: Kim@rurallanduse.com Address: 846 A Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Property Owner: Dehoti, LLC/Hamid Madani , Phone: See agent Company: Dehoti, LLC , E-mail: See agent Address: PO Box 40008, Eu.gene, OR 97404 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-34-44 ITAX LOT NO(S):300 Property Address: 4521 Franklin Blvd, Eugene, OR 97403 Size of Property: 1.52 +" _ Acres ❑✓ Square Feet ❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Refinement Plan amendment and Zone Chage from MU Employment to MU Commercial Existing Use: Mobile home park " . # of Lots/Parcels: 1 Av .Lot/Parcel Size: na sf j Density: na du/acre Prospective 91T Applicant: ignature `'- dv f Print Case No.: I�b�"' DO Application Fee: $ W,00 TOTAL FEES: !& 09, VO Revised 07/20/22 sml of 4 1AVDate: 1110 Technical Fee: PROJECT NUMBER: Reviewed bv: Postage Fee: Development Initiation Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Initiation Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss a development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Initiation Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Initiation Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Initiation Meeting Application • The application must conform to the Development Initiation Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. • Development Initiation Meetings are typically scheduled on Tuesdays and Thursdays. The Tuesday time slot is 11:00 am and the Thursday time slot is 1:30 pm. • We strive to conduct the Development Initiation Meetings between three to four weeks of receiving the application. • The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff and referral agencies in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Initiation Meeting • The applicant and any design team should attend the Development Initiation Meeting. • The meeting is scheduled for one hour. • Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. • The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 07/20/22 sm2 of 4 Development Initiation Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist �✓; Application Fee - Refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. El Development Initiation Meeting Application Form Five (5) Questions - List specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer Sec during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five below questions. If more than five questions are asked or multiple part questions are presented staff may not be able to address all relevant concerns. Prioritizing the five questions is recommended. n/bil One (1) Copy and one (1) digital copy of the Proposed Plan - Suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12.120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17.120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. Tj Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' North arrow F� Date of preparation I Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions r Approximate location, number, and dimensions of proposed lots a? How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height Revised 07/20/22 sm3 of 4 Q Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces RI Parking and circulation plan *The requesting meeting relates to a Refinement Plan Amendment and Zone change. There is no site specific development proposed at this time. As such, no site plan is proposed. Questions: Metro has corresponded with the city on this proposal. See attached. The questions remain generally the same, even after the City's input. The proposal is from Mixed Use Employment to Mixed Use Commercial. 1. The City's comments focus on housing policies, but the property is not zoned residential despite the existing use. Why would housing policies of the GRP be a bar to redevelopment of the parcel? 2. Given that the Metro Plan designation is Mixed Use Commercial, can the City support a changed to Mixed Use Commercial? 3. What would the City's objections be to this proposed amendment? 4. Can we further discuss the issued raised in your November 28, email. Attached. Revised 8/4/22 MEM kim@metroplanning.com From: kim@metroplanning.com Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2024 3:35 PM To: 'Kim O'Dea' Subject: FW: Madani: Glenwood From: hamid <hamid@dehoti.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2024 12:34 PM To: Kim O'Dea <kim@metroplanning.com> Subject: Re: Madani: Glenwood yes you do Thanks Sent from my Galaxy -------- Original message -------- From: Kim O'Dea <kim metroplanning.com> Date: 1/9/24 6:19 PM (GMT+03:30) To: hamid <hamid dehoti.com> Subject: Re: Madani: Glenwood Will do. So I have permission to sign on your behalf, correct? Sent from my Phone On Jan 9, 2024, at 3:38 AM, hamid <hami > wrote: Hi Kim I am in Iran at this time and internet is veryweak here. please consider my signature is on the forms that you sent me. I agree with the terms and please start the process and I will be back by February 3rd next month. Thankyou Hamid Madani Sent from my Galaxy 1/8/24, 10:46 AM Madani: print job 2 kim@metroplanning.com <kim@metroplanning.com> To: Sandra Hentze <sandra@metroplanning.com> And also print this email. From: RUST Mark <mrust@springfield-or.gov> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 10:01 AM To: kim@metroplanning.com Subject: RE: Glenwood plan amendment question Kim, Metro Planning Mail - Madani: print job 2 Sandra Hentze <sandra@metroplanning.com> Getting back to your questions on this. I had forwarded this email out to others to get input. A couple of notes: Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 1:40 PM • This property was considered to be developed at the time of the Commercial and Industrial BLI. See Map 2-2 of the CIBL-EOA from 2015. Nor was it determined to be a "potentially redevelopable site" based on Map 2-6. • The stated objective for Subarea D of preserving land for employment uses and enabling Springfield to concentrate the minimally viable Glenwood commercial retail opportunities in close proximity to the residential mixed-use area. • There may be complexities associated with the Nodal Development Overlay District, MMA, and CFA planning that is happening at this time. • This should fall within the parameters for site-specific comprehensive map amendments that can be processed as a Type 3 application. I'm pointing you to the housing policies in the Phase 1 Glenwood Refinement Plan (GRP). As noted on pp. 109-116 of the Glenwood Refinement Plan PDF linked here, the policies in the Housing Section of the Housing & Economic Development Chapter are intended to work hand in hand with those in the Land Use Chapter. Given the very different contexts associated with existing and planned housing, distinct objectives and policies were articulated for the existing housing stock of manufactured home parks and single dwelling units, as well as planned new housing development. Together, the housing policies are intended to: • enhance the progress of high-density residential development; • facilitate the development of a neighborhood where residents from a range of economic levels, household sizes, and ages can choose to live; • address the impact of redevelopment on existing manufactured home park residents; https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1 /?ik=6dffOc432c&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1 787378746123657387&simpl=msg-f:1 787378746123657387 113 1 /8/24, 10:46 AM Metro Planning Mail - Madani: print job 2 • ensure existing housing meets current Building, Fire, and Health codes; and • support the preservation, rehabilitation, and maintenance of existing housing over the Plan period. This is our initial input. Let me know if we can provide some additional information. I hope you had a nice Thanksgiving and you are well. Thanks Mark Rust, AICP Planning Manager, Current Planning and Code Enforcement Development & Public Works Department Community Development Division City of Springfield 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 office: (541) 726-3654 - 711 Relay mrust@springfield-or.gov Let me know if you need any of this communication in a different format, and I'll do my best to get you what you need. For more information please see the City's accessibility page: http://www.springfield-or.gov/accessibility.htmi From: kim@metroplanning.com <kim@metroplanning.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 9:35 AM To: RUST Mark <mrust@springfield-or.gov> Subject: Glenwood plan amendment question ** WARNING: This email originated from outside of your organization. Please do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. J** Mark I have a client with property in the Glenwood area (Map 17-03-34-44). He wants a refinement plan amendment/zone change from Mixed Use Employment to Mixed Use Commercial. Details are below and attached. I've reviewed the Metro plan and refinement plans and don't see any glaring bar to such a proposal, but would like your initial thoughts. Is there any place else I should look? Anything glaring that you know of that would prohibit such a proposal? https://mail.google.com/mail/u/l/?ik=6dffOc432c&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1787378746123657387&simpl=msg-f: 1787378746123657387 213 1/8/24,10:46 AM Metro Planning Mail - Madani: print job 2 • Zoning: Employment MU (Glenwood) • Metro Plan: Mixed Use Commercial • 1999 Glenwood Refinement Plan (1999). Nodal Employment Mixed Use • 2014 Glenwood Riverfront Plan (2014). Subarea 8; McVay Riverfront Area; Nodal Employment Mixed Use The properties south, east and west of the SP do not have nodal overlay. However, there is precedent for Mixed Use Commercial with Nodal north of Franklin Blvd. Nodal designation should not be a barrier. All properties surrounding the SP are Mixed Use. The proposal is consistent. All properties surrounding the SP are within the McVAy Riverfront subarea. The proposal is consistent. The properties south, east and west of the SP are not in "previous Plan Sub -area 8." The relevance if this is unknown. SDC 5.6.105(C). Citizen initiated amendments are allowed only twice each calendar year; on or before January 5th or July 5th. SDC 5.6.110. Review is Type IV process. SDC 5.6.115 Criteria (A) In reaching a decision on the adoption or amendment of refinement plans and this code's text, the City Council shall adopt findings that demonstrate conformance to the following: (1) The Metro Plan and Springfield Comprehensive Plan; (2) Applicable State statutes; and (3) Applicable State-wide Planning Goals and Administrative Rules. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/l/?ik=6dffOc432c&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1787378746123657387&simpl=msg-f:1787378746123657387 3/3 1/8/24, 10:41 AM Metro Planning Mail - Madani: print job (A) In reaching a decision on the adoption or amendment of refinement plans and this code's text, the City Council shall adopt findings that demonstrate conformance to the following: (1) The Metro Plan and Springfield Comprehensive Plan; (2) Applicable State statutes; and (3) Applicable State-wide Planning Goals and Administrative Rules. 7 attachments A&T Map 17033444.pdf 514K Location map.pdf 1111K Zoning map - Employment MU Glenwood.pdf 1010K Glenwood Refinement Plan 1999 diagram exerpt.pdf 514K Glenwood Refinement Plan excerpt.pdf 869K Metro Plan excerpt.pdf 618K y Glenwood Riverfront excerpt diagrams.pdf -I 533K https://mail.google.com/maillull/?ik=6dffOc432c&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1787378659039743027&simpl=msg-f:1787378659039743027 2/2 NM n. w Cn 0 z Q �J z cw p c z U)0 w Q 0 LL -Ld=ld1S O J meq. 1GN� P N _� S I ir- Al IL rla m �. Q rsY . n � i cu p ~ L) �C. c y oa L d* o O `n rti R �I O 't err N't W o Al. ■ r, C }�L G7 ❑ � .7 s + a7 Q C C Mr► ■.irs❑ a 5 ° t yo a ❑ o ❑ Ae Gyir _ cs�§na y` �_ d `fel 7 ' ) ti � Wil ' c a,3ELE 9 �d$ ❑ S+Y7+1 �C `.] E S - E MUD -� 0 '1131 ichn 1.0 If❑ H ❑ p .�E3c rd� A p C em oc.� 2 1ppp, 4w— iiv eL Ty A Tl 3 ZONING O.M.1W MU 401-01 Q-6im.op—m 4w— iiv eL Ty A Tl 3 I PTA MALX W ' 1 _ 1 ry • .-I IU11i 11 R Z44 %mmr FJAM�� • � I r !f �(g! .: • �•i �^ "�,- !r �'�� Irn eer "-a( ��3f{11)�1} ' if +' - E .� ••.ri ,t.ry_�yr*�•"m �i,i ilk ��i��i�i--"`1S'}"1 ktF�j'.I I Crnrl:ry• 1 {r##l�l Glenwood;•..��s +lw _(. �-I {. ^'. J'� J A 1 .S a; 1 _ • ti _ __ • I. (1999 original) xUit4r • P"'I 'S t r 1 aim.. !!. • K — ! y r t I • er0.0 r i s _ Glenwood fU?a' Riverfront Dorris p� (244 Plan m • Ranch Park update area) 1_ _i_ �– - -- – -- '— • i i - �• so low 1- rot • • • ? r► N m r�o sc°u c a"iro ° ° n fl,a c -+ w p ro ro rc 3�0'00'9� 3 11 3 � OSol m�'c'-o°map . �'� ;ate' ni ro —� �to:t,5! � �cC cQ o0rt�`� aroma �� r�*3�Hoha`� 3_ o e% ea m ro ro� Q a= aL ci3 a ro a i �N o ate' o a�*��.� °+�n 3 3^—� ci°- i� 3 3Q_CL a�3'"d�r�o �° fpa3�''^' °<a3 �°ep�3y �a e"p oC' Cm @ eD m Q- n 7' = `� w C. p d � n x •' _ H Oi vi � a � = 2. --% m �° ^was rD � ' c. 3 n vai <' 3 °� ° a ;, r� m -n CL n' y° iG a B -T a obi p a N T ep I g a N rn t u u o c a y c -a r O CL E ac+ ,Q Y! ani �gr cn �m IA 0 CL cm c c A 'E E "!7 1� dJ 3 w A 01�j Cs p v 2!o:g0.2,oa-roa C V1 v+ Q! — ++ Q EacQo N v c N = Ll N W C C `O -& ZD C .w G •� c o d m Cc �` °1 C 2 c � ro •� CLM' E 10.2 O L .C.. Q a a c c a o� j m .? LL a :.. .c 1000 IL L g a N rn t u u o c a y c -a r O CL E ac+ ,Q Y! ani �gr cn �m IA 0 CL cm c c A 'E E "!7 1� dJ 3 w A 01�j Cs p v 2!o:g0.2,oa-roa C V1 v+ Q! — ++ Q EacQo N v c N = Ll N W C C `O -& ZD C .w G •� C o � m Cc �` °1 C � ro CLM' E 10.2 O L .C.. Q m