HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit Correspondence 1982-06-17-
OFFICE OF THE
CITY ATTORNEY
CIITTT OF SPH,I\TG]E-IEIJD
SPRINGFIELD. OREGON 97477
June 17, 1982 223 NORTH A 6TREET
6UITE D
746-9621
Robert and l,larian Gielish
85322 Jasper Park Road
Springfield, OR 97477
Dear l4r. and Mrs. Gielish:
this office represents the City of Springfield, Department ofPublic Vlorks.
P1ease find enclosed a letter to you dated Decembet 4r 1981,regarding property which you orrn at 297 South 43rd Street, Spring-fie1d, Oregon.
ft is our understanding that you have connected the dwelling at
297 South 43rd Street to the sanitary sewer. It is our further
understanding that you have not complied with the requirementsof Oregon Administrative Ru1es, Chapter 340, Division 7, whichin per+-inent part states as follows:
"Uach and every owner of the real property upon which issituated a subsurface sewage disposal system which isrequired to be abandoned, or which has been abandoned,shalI have aII the sludge from the septJ-c tank, seepagepit or cesspool removed by a person holding a sewage dis-posal service license, and shal1 fill same with cleanbar rLu.r gravel or other material approved by the Directoror his authorized representative. "
i
I
I
I
I
A review of our file'indicates that a previousfrom this office to you dated February 2, 1982,
compliance.
letter was sentrequesting your
If there is some reason
Ivlr. Bordeaux, Plumbing
him. He is available
why you cannot comply, please contactInspector, and explain those reasons toar 726-3769.
t-
In the event that l1r. Bordeaux does not receive an explanation
re
i, -, '!
DNflERf,@RAM!u CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
Ntay L0, L982
TO Joe Leahy,
Assistant City Attorney
Sa1ly Johnson,
Environmental Inspector
pile of debris. Transwestern
clean up of a large accumulati
Investors was sent a compliance letter requiring
on of garden debris by April 26, 1982. No action
5vFRON,I
SUBJECT: Non-Compliance With the Following Cases
1)297 South 43rd Street - Violation of 2-10-1 of the City Code and Chapter 540,
V s10n , 0regon inistrative Ru1es, connection to sanitary sewer, failed
septic tank. Mr. and Mrs. Gielish have connected the dwelling to the sanitary
sewer as required by Roy Bordeauxrs Decenber 4, 1981 letter and your February
2, 1982 fo11ow-up letter (copies attached), but have not pumped and fil1ed the
septic tank as also was required by those letters. Perhaps, a 2nd letter from
your office would be appropriate in a case such as this where partial compliance
has been obtained.
2)184 North 19th - Vlolation of Sections 5-1-1 (5) (a) and (e) of the City Code,
has been taken. Please send a letter. NOTE: You sent an April 5, 1982 letter
with regard to this violation to a Bruce Scheidman who is not the current owner
(copies of letters attached).
3)1247 ttctt Street - Violation of 22.05 of the Zoning Code, i1Iega1 fence. The
iesIE-ent has-erected a 5 foot high fence on the front property 1ine. She con-
tacted me about a variance through the Board of Appeals for lr{ayrs meeting.
Application for the May 6, 1982 meeting has not been submitted nor has the
fence been corrected (copy of ny letter to the resident attached).
4)138 Main Street - Violation of Section 2-7-4 of the City Code, sidewalk repair.
Enclosed is the entire file on the damaged sidewalk abutting D. G J. Furniture
Store,138 Main Street. As you know, Mr. Drews has not repaired the sidewalk
and has verbally stated that he does not intend to. Please initiate the ap-
propriate action in order to secure compliance.
s)2325 "G" Street - Violation of Sections 5-1-1 (3) (b) and (d) of the city code,
used materials in pu blic view. Mr. Royce Burian has cardboard boxes, used
furniture, and appliances in public vi.ew on his property at the above referenced
address. In September of 1979; after completing the entire abatement process
with no compliance, Mr. Burian was cited to appear before Municipal Court for
a similar violation as stated above. Ir'lr. Burian was found guilty and fined but
would be given a suspended sentence if his property was found to be in compliance
within one week from the court hearing. The property was in compliance, and the
fine was suspended. Please advise with regard to the most effective way to handle
thecurrentvio1ationin1ightofthepreviousvio1ationandcourtcitation
mfl
4.
MEivlO T0: .
Joe Leahy
Non-Compliance with Cases
Ilay 10, L982
Page 2.
The following cases have complied after receiving a letter from your office.
1)2147 Main Street - Si gn Code violation.
2)165 North 33rd Street - Nuisance Code violation.
attachments
sJ/1h