Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMeeting Packet Planner 12/15/2023 DEVELOPMENT INITIATION MEETING DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD CITY HALL 225 FIFTH STREET DPW Conference Room 615/616 + Zoom Meeting Date: Thursday, January 4, 2024 1:30 – 2:30 1. DEVELOPMENT INITIATION MTG #811-23-000278-PRE 811-23-000280-PROJ Monkey Hero LLC Assessor’s Map: 17-03-26-31 TL: 00900 Address: 1620 5th Street Existing Use: Residential property with existing home Planner: Andy Limbird The Development Issues Meeting informational packet for this meeting is available on-line for you to review or print out @ Laserfiche website: www.springfield-or.gov/weblink8/browse.aspx SITE VICINITY MAP 811-23-000278-PRE Development Initiation Meeting 17-03-26-31 TL 00900 1620 5th Street Monkey Hero LLC Revised 07/20/22 sm1 of 4 City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Initiation Meeting (DIM) Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Prospective Applicant Name: Phone: Company: E-mail: Address: Prospective Applicant’s Rep.: Phone: Company: E-mail: Address: Property Owner: Phone: Company: E-mail: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: TAX LOT NO(S): Property Address: Size of Property: Acres Square Feet Description of Proposal: If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Existing Use: # of Lots/Parcels: Avg. Lot/Parcel Size: sf Density: du/acre Prospective Applicant: Date: Signature Print Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: complete this section) Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $0 Postage Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: TENTATIVE MAP NARRATIVE December 7, 2023 Assessor’s Map: 17-03-26-31 Tax Lot 900 Applicants: Monkey Hero, LLC (541) 896-0408 Applicant’s Representative: The Favreau Group 3750 Norwich Ave. Eugene, OR 97408 541-683-7048 Attn: Tony Favreau LAND USE REQUEST The applicant proposes to divide the subject 0.49 acre property to create 5 lots and to provide all necessary infrastructure to support the development. The proposed residential use and density (6-14 dwelling units/acre) are consistent with the existing Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning and the City’s standards for development in the LDR zoning district, where a maximum of 14 dwelling units/acre is permitted and the proposed is 10.2 units per acre. The proposal does not include any improvements to 5th Street or Moffit Ln. SITE AND SURROUNDING CHARACTERISTICS The site is within an established Springfield residential neighborhood. The property is located at 1620 5th St. and has an existing home situated towards the front of the property. The Northern property line abuts a drainage channel, the Western property line abuts Hamlin school. The Southern and Eastern property lines abut Moffit Lane and 5th Street respectively. The site soils are 2224A Courtney Gravelly Silty Clay Loam and #119 Salem-Urban Land Complex, soil group D. 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that all applicable criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to a public agency, the Director may waive any approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future development application. A. The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel size and dimensions. Response: There are no lot minimum sizes or dimensions. B. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Response: The property is zoned Low Density Residential (LDR). The Metro Plan diagram for the subject property is LDR. C. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Response: a. Water: The proposed development is within the Springfield city limits and will receive water service from the Springfield Utility Board (SUB). There is an existing 16” waterline and 12” waterline in Moffit Lane. b. Wastewater: There are 2 existing 8” wastewater systems. One in 5th St. and one I Moffit Lane. c. Storm Drain: There is an existing storm drain inlet in 5th St. at the northeast corner of the site. d. Streets: 5th Street and Moffit Lane are fully built and no improvements are proposed. D. The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. Response: See Response to part C. E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas; other riparian areas and wetlands specified in Section 4.3-117; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. Response: The Metro Area General Plan, Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map, State Designated Wetlands Map, Hydric Soils Map, Wellhead Protection Zone Map, FEMA Maps, and the list of Historic landmark sites have been consulted and with the exception noted below, there are no features needing to be protected or preserved on this site. If any artifacts are found during construction, there are state laws that could apply; ORS 97.740, ORS 358.905, ORS 390.235. If human remains are discovered during construction, it is a Class “C” felony to proceed under ORS 97.740. The site is relatively level and drains to the north. The onsite driveway runoff will be treated via pervious pavers. The houses on parcels 2 & 3 will have individual treatment facilities on each parcel. Criterion 6 is met. Physical features, including but not limited to significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings, and historic features are not present on the site. F. Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. Response: 5th Street and Moffit Lane are fully built and no improvements are proposed. G. Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished as specified in this Code. Response: There is no other adjoining property under the same ownership that can be developed. H. Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its development as specified in this Code. Response: There is no undeveloped land adjoining the property. Approval of the proposed subdivision will not impede development of adjacent land. I. Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the City’s urbanizable area and no concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards specified below shall also apply. Response: This does not apply. DIM Questions 1620 5th St 1. Can we abandon the onsite 6” WW lateral? 2. What is the minimum width for a driveway? 3. Do we need to provide any onsite parking for lot 4? 4. Lots 4 & 5 will share the existing driveway. Any issues with this? 5. Do you see any issues we need to address?