HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication Applicant 11/29/2023Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Land Division Tentative Plan
Partition, Subdivision
Application Type (Applicant: check one)
Partition Tentative Pre-Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Pre-Submittal:
Partition Tentative Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Submittal:
Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section)
Applicant Name: Phone:
Company: Fax:
Address:
Applicant’s Rep.: Phone:
Company: Fax:
Address:
Property Owner: Phone:
Company: Fax:
Address:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: TAX LOT NO(S):
Property Address:
Size of Property: Acres Square Feet
Proposed Name of Subdivision:
Description of
Proposal:
If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Existing Use:
# of Lots/Parcels: Total acreage of parcels/
allowable density:
Proposed #
Dwell Units
Signatures: Please sign and print your name and date in the appropriate box on the next page.
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: complete this section)
Associated Applications: Signs:
Pre-Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by:
Case No.: Date: Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Postage Fee: $
TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER:
Aster-Kjessler, LLC
3450 Walton Ln, Eugene, OR 97408
Jed Truett, AICP, Principal Planner (541) 302-9830
Metro Planning, Inc
846 A St, Spfld, OR 97477
Aster-Kjessler, LLC
3450 Walton Ln, Eugene, OR 97408
17-02-34-44 90001
1.13 X
2-Lot Partition
10 existing condominium dwellings and garages
2 1.13ac/6-14units
No development is
proposed w/ this
application.
N/A
Owner Signatures
This application form is used for both the required pre-submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process.
An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
Pre-Submittal
Owner:
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and
accurate for sch duling of the Pre-Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the
owner, the own r hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory
timelines, infor quests and requirements conveyed to my representative.
Signatur
Michael Kjessler
Print
Submittal
Owner:
I represent this applicatio,n to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this appli tion at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processi the application is provided herein or the Information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the bmittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This stat ment serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete applicatio
Print
Revised 1/7/14 kl 2 of 10
11/14/2023
Michael Kjessler
Revised 1/7/14 kl 3 of 10
Land Division Tentative Application Process
1.Applicant Submits a Land Division Tentative Application for Pre-Submittal
The application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet.
A pre-submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre-submittal
meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon.
Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre-submittal meetings within five to seven
working days of receiving an application.
2.Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre-Submittal Meeting
The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre-
submittal meeting.
The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and
Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall’s office, and the Planning
Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes.
The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre-Submittal Checklist specifying the items
required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the
applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City.
3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and
Issue a Decision
A complete application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal
Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet.
A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless
appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.
Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the
property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition,
the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property.
There is a 14-day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed.
Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their
comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval
criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those
given notice.
Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
At the applicant’s request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision
prior to issuing the final land use decision.
The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is
effective on the day it is mailed.
The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15
calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official.
Revised 1/7/14 kl 4 of 10
Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE:
ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre-Submittal and Submittal.
If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please
state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form.
Application Fee – refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public
Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected
at the pre-submittal and submittal stages.
Land Division Tentative Application Form
Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the
action to be taken. Density - list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density
and the density proposed.
Copy of the Deed
Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances.
Copy of the Land Division Plan Reduced to 8½”x 11”, which will be mailed as part of
the required neighboring property notification packet.
Right-of-Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage
on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed
Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations, and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures
Manual.
Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City’s
transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given
development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also
address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives.
Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre-Submittal OR
Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets:
All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved
and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of
preparation.
All plan sets must be folded to 8½” by 11” and bound by rubber bands.
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer
Revised 1/7/14 kl 5 of 10
Vicinity Map
The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings,
curb cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and
what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use
and required setbacks from proposed property lines.
The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse
Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department
The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment
or Letter of Map Revision
The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department
Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5” in diameter or greater when
measured 4 ½ feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian
areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings
Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of
Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted
concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable
soils and/or a high water table
b. Land Division Tentative Plan
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor
City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district
boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division
Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the
proposed land division
Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land
division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate
dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale
Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and
area of illumination
Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys,
dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division.
Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and
relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan,
Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map.
Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities
Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways
Location of existing and proposed transit facilities
Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian
access ways and bike trails
Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip
Revised 1/7/14 kl 6 of 10
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas,
telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points
The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose,
condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated
Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as specified
in SDC 5.12-120 E.
c. Stormwater Management Plan
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are
proposed as part of the stormwater management system
Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but
not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater
quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained
Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for
land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals)
Amount of proposed cut and fill
Additional Materials That May be Required
IT IS THE APPLICANT’S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS
DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120:
Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner’s Association Agreement
Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal
as specified in SDC 3.2-230
Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of
bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the
top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present
Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the
additional standards of the overlay district
If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified
in SDC 5.19-100
A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property
Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence
the permit application has been submitted for review
Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land
and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development
Revised 1/7/14 kl 7 of 10
Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100
and 5.21-100
An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is
proposed outside of the city limits but within the City’s urban service area and can
be served by sanitary sewer
All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate
time of installation and method of financing
December 6, 2013
REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY:
In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial “stormwater scoping sheet,” provided to help
engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and
Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became
apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added
bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of
decisions.
As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process.
Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require
development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater
scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet,
which reflects changes requested by the development community.
PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A
COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS
DIRECTIONS FOR USING STORMWATER SCOPING SHEETS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location.
2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study.
(Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.)
3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Attn: Clayton
McEachern.
4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete
stormwater study.
5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater
study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The
scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study.
Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter)
as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: http://www.springfield-
or.gov/DPW/EngineeringandConstructionResources.htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Forms
section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process.
Sincerely,
Clayton McEachern, PE
City of Springfield, Development and Public Works
Email: cmceachern@springfield-or.gov
Phone: (541) 736 – 1036
Fax: (541) 736 – 1021
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.726.3753
FAX: 541.736.1021
www.springfield-or.gov
Return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachern@springfield-or,gov, FAX: (541) 736-1021
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.726.3753
FAX: 541.726.1021
www.springfield-or.gov
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
Project Name: Applicant:
Assessors Parcel #: Date:
Land Use(s): Phone #:
Project Size (Acres): Fax #:
Approx. Impervious Area: Email:
Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor’s map):
Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary:
Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices:
Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, UH may be substituted for Rational Method)
Small Site Study – (use Rational Method for calculations)
Mid-Level Development Study – (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
Full Drainage Development Study – (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
Environmental Considerations:
Wellhead Zone: Hillside Development:
Wetland/Riparian: Floodway/Floodplain:
Soil Type: Other Jurisdictions
Downstream Analysis:
N/A
Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation:
Manhole/Junction to take analysis to:
--------------------------------- (Area below this line filled out by the City and Returned to the Applicant) ----------------------------
(At a minimum, all boxes checked by the City on the front and back of this sheet shall be submitted
for an application to be complete for submittal, although other requirements may be necessary.)
------------------------------------------------- (Area below this line filled out by Applicant) --------------------------------------------------
(Please return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield Development and Public Works; Fax # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036),
email:cmceachern@springfield-or.gov
Form Version 5: June 2015
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS
* Based upon the information provided on the front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is needed for an
application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu of the Springfield
Development Code (SDC) or the City’s Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site
approval; Additional site specific information may be required. Note: Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completed form has been
signed in the space provided below:
Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3)
Req’d N/A
All non-building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration
media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by
vegetated methods.
Where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth
in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual.
For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified
by the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (Sec2.4.1).
If a stormwater treatment swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes,
bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene’s Stormwater Management Manual.
Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM.
All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall
be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure.
General Study Requirements (EDSPM Section 4.03)
Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon.
A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map.
Calculations showing system capacity for a 2-year storm event and overflow effects of a 25-year storm event.
The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins.
Review of Downstream System (EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C)
A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC).
Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable.
Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04).
Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set.
Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or
proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb load
without failure of the pipe structure.
Manning’s “n” values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to
achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well.
Other/Miscellaneous
Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drains.
Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to
another.
Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of
residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to
the website: http://www.deq.state.or.us/wq/uic/uic.htm for more information.
Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre-development rates for the 2 through 25-year storm events.
*This form shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, of the stormwater study.
For Official Use Only:
As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study
and plan set. Signature Date .
* IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW AND SIGN!
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Attn: Andy Limbird
November 13, 2023
Re: Notice of Incomplete Application
Case Number: 811-23-000167-PRE
Project Name: Aster Condominiums Partition
Applicant: Aster-Kjessler, LLC
Submitted: July 26, 2023
Completeness Review Meeting: August 8, 2023
Assessor’s Map & Tax Lot: 17-02-34-44-90001
Dear Andy,
Please accept this letter in response to the August 8, 2023 Completeness Review Meeting for the Aster Condominium Partition –
Tentative Plan. Herein addressed are all Completeness Checklist items that City staff indicated were missing or incomplete.
Staff comments and Springfield Development Code (SDC) sections are indicated by bold and/or italic typeface; applicant responses
follow in plain typeface.
Should you have questions or require additional information to deem the application complete for substantive review processing,
please contact me at your earliest opportunity.
Respectfully,
Katie Keidel
Associate Planner
PLANNING
1. There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line that runs along the southern edge of proposed Parcel 1 to a point
approximately 45 feet from the western boundary. At the terminus of the public line there are multiple service connections to
existing dwelling units within the complex. The alignment of all these service laterals are not shown on the tentative partition
plan. A public utility easement will be required for the segment of public sewer line running along the southern boundary of
Parcel 1, and private utility easement(s) will be required for all service laterals extending from the public line.
Response: A 7’ PUE (public utility easement) is proposed for the segment of the public sanitary-sewer line running along the southern
boundary of proposed Parcel 1 and is shown on the tentative partition plan. A private utility easement for co-locating potentially existing
utilities is proposed on the tentative partition plan. Should relocating of utilities be necessary for potential future development this will be
completed by the property owner.
2. The proposed building envelope area is not depicted on the partition plan. Because of multiple buried utility lines the
applicant will need to confirm buildability of this proposed parcel.
Response: The tentative partition plan does not show a building envelope area as development is not proposed at this time. The
property owner will relocate/co-locate any existing utilities that require relocating to ensure buildability of proposed Parcel 1 at the time
of any potential future development.
3. Street trees will be required along the South 67th Street and Aster Street frontages of the partition area.
Response: The required number of street trees along the South 67th and Aster Street frontages are proposed on the tentative partition
plan and if approved will be planted when required.
4. As noted above the applicant has not depicted the alignment of sanitary sewer, water and electrical lines that cross the
Parcel 1 area. Applicant must request utility locates to determine location and alignment of service lines prior to submitting
tentative partition plan.
Response: The property owner chooses not to request a private utility locate at this time and will address any possibly existing utility
necessities at the time of any potential future development of proposed Parcel 1.
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING
1. Existing street trees not shown. Three new street trees will be required as part of the partition along Aster and S 67th
Street.
Response: Existing and proposed street trees are now shown on the tentative partition plan.
2. A 7' PUE along Aster and S 67t h Street will be required. It appears sewer service to the southern units is by a public sewer
main that crosses the proposed parcel 1 and a 14' wide sewer easement is required for this. It is likely a water and power
easement will be required for this area also and these can be co-located. The likely location of the utilities will probably make
parcel 1 not buildable.
Response: A 14’ wide sewer easement is proposed on the revised tentative partition plan. The property owner will relocate/co-locate
any existing utilities on proposed Parcel 1 so that it is buildable for any potential future development.
3. No new impervious surface is being proposed with this land division but any additional development of either parcel will
require stormwater management when that occurs.
Response: Noted.
TRANSPORTATION
1. Applicant must provide a plan showing access to the new parcel from the existing shared driveway to minimize access points
onto the collector roadway. An access easement must be established providing access rights to the new parcel.
Response: A proposed access easement extending from the existing shared driveway to proposed Parcel 1 is shown on the revised
Tentative Partition plans.
2. Ramps at the intersection of Aster and S 67th are not shown. Sidewalk on the west side of S 6 7t h is shown yet does not exist.
Response: These revisions have been made to the tentative partition plan.
3. Missing the stop sign and no parking signage installations.
Response: These items have been added to the tentative partition plan.
TENTATIVE PARTITION PLAN FOR ASTER-KJESSLER LLC
Submittal No.
2
Document Date: November 14, 2023
Applicant’s Request: Approval of Type II Tentative Partition Plan
for Replat of “Parcel B” of Aster
Condominiums Plat (1980)
Property Owner/ Applicant:
Aster-Kjessler LLC
3450 Walton Ln
Eugene, OR 97408
Applicant’s Representative/
Planner/Project Coordinator:
Metro Planning, Inc.
Katie Keidel, Associate Planner
846 A Street
Springfield, OR 97477
(541) 302-9830
Surveyor: EGR & Associates
2535 Prairie Rd
Eugene, OR 97402
(541) 688-8322
Civil Engineer: A & O Engineering
380 Q Street, Suite 200
Springfield, OR 97477
(541) 302-9790
Subject property: Assesssor’s Map Number 17-02-34-44
Tax Lot 90001
Site Address/ Location: N/A
Total Property Size:
1.13+/- acres
Zoning/ Designation:
R-1/ LDR
Size Proposed Parcel 1:
Size Proposed Parcel 2:
5,135 sf
44,496 sf
WRITTEN NARRATIVE
1
Background
This proposal pertains to Assessor’s Map and Tax Lot 17-02-34-44-90001, an approximately 1.13-acre lot located inside
the Springfield city limits, on Aster Street near S 67th Street (“subject property”). The subject property is “Parcel B” of
the 1980 Aster Condominiums Plat. It is zoned City of Springfield R-1 which maintains density standards of a minimum
of six (6) and a maximum of fourteen (14) dwelling units per net acre.
The proposed land division will create two (2) new lots – Lot 1 is proposed at 5,135 square feet and Lot 2 is proposed at
44,496 square feet. No development is proposed as a part of this Tentative Partition plan and the parent parcel meets
density requirements as there are ten (10) existing dwelling units situated among the 1.13-acre subject property.
This written statement intends to demonstrate the proposal’s compliance with all criteria and standards for Land
Divisions under SDC 5.12-115 Tentative Plan – General; SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements; and SDC
5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria. The Springfield Development Code (SDC) sections are indicated by bold and/or italic
typeface; applicant responses follow in plain typeface.
5.12.115 Tentative Plan—General.
Any residential land division shall conform to the following standards:
(A) The lot/parcel dimensions shall conform to the minimum standards of this code. When lots/parcels are more
than double the minimum area permitted by the zoning district, the Director shall require that these
lots/parcels be arranged:
(1) To allow redivision; and
(2) To allow for the extension of streets to serve future lots/parcels.
(3) Placement of structures on the larger lots/parcels shall be subject to approval by the
Director upon a determination that the potential maximum density of the larger lot/parcel is not
impaired. In order to make this determination, the Director may require a Future Development Plan
as specified in SDC 5.12.120(E).
Response: The subject property is zoned R-1 which maintains a 3,000 sq ft minimum lot size. Lot 1 is proposed at 5,135
sf; Lot 2 is proposed at 44,496 sf. Neither proposed lot exceeds double the minimum size allowed. This criterion is met.
(B) Double frontage lots/parcels shall be avoided, unless necessary to prevent access to residential development
from collector and arterial streets or to overcome specific topographic situations.
Response: SDC currently maintains no R-1 minimum frontage requirements.
(C) Panhandle lots/parcels shall comply with the standards specified in SDC 3.2.215 and 4.2.120(A). In the case
of multiple panhandles in Partitions, construction of necessary utilities to serve all approved panhandle
lots/parcels shall occur prior to recording the Plat.
Response: This tentative partition plan proposes no panhandle lots/ parcels.
(D) Public street standards as specified in SDC 4.2.105.
Response: No public streets are included or proposed in this tentative partition.
2
5.12.120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements.
A Tentative Plan application shall contain the elements necessary to demonstrate that the provisions of this code
are being fulfilled.
EXCEPTION: In the case of Partition applications with the sole intent to donate land to a public agency, the Director,
during the Application Completeness Check Meeting, may waive any submittal requirements that can be addressed
as part of a future development application.
(A) General Requirements.
(1) The Tentative Plan, including any required Future Development Plan, shall be prepared by an Oregon
Licensed Professional Land Surveyor on standard sheets of 18 inches x 24 inches. The services of an
Oregon Licensed Professional Engineer may also be require d by the City in order to resolve utility issues
(especially stormwater management, street design and transportation issues), and site constraint and/or
water quality issues.
Response: The Tentative Partition Plan has been prepared by Ryan Erickson, PLS of EGR & Associates, Inc., an Oregon
Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, and is included with this submittal on standard sheets of 18” x 24”.
(2) The scale of the Tentative Plan shall be appropriate to the area involved and the amount of detail and
data, normally 1 inch = 50 feet, 1 inch = 100 feet, or 1 inch = 200 feet.
Response: A scale of 1”:30’ is used on the Tentative Plans.
(3) A north arrow and the date the Tentative Plan was prepared.
Response: A north arrow and date of plan preparation are included on the Tentative Partition Plans included with this
application.
(4) The name and address of the owner, applicant, if different, and the Land Surveyor and/or Engineer who
prepared the Partition Tentative Plan.
Response: Owner/Applicant is Aster-Kjessler LLC. Surveyor who prepared the Tentative Partition Plan is Ryan Erickson,
of EGR & Associates, an Oregon Professional Licensed Surveyor.
(5) A drawing of the boundaries of the entire area owned by the partitioner or subdivider of which the
proposed land division is a part.
Response: On the Tentative Partition Plan, a thicker black line is drawn around the subject property to easily show the
boundaries of the subject property.
(6) City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and any special service district boundaries or
railroad right-of-way, which cross or abut the proposed land division.
Response: There are no special service district boundaries, city boundaries, or railroad rights -of-way that cross or abut
the proposed Partition.
3
(7) Applicable zoning districts and the Metro Plan designation of the proposed land division and of properties
within 100 feet of the boundary of the subject property.
Response: The subject property is zoned City of Springfield R-1 and designated Low Density Residential on the Metro
Plan. All adjacent properties are also zoned R-1.
(8) The dimensions (in feet) and size (either in square feet or acres) of each lot/parcel and the approximate
dimensions of each building site, where applicable, and the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale.
Response: Dimensions and sizes for each proposed lot are indicated in square feet and/or acres on the attached
Tentative Partition plans.
(9) The location, outline to scale and present use of all existing structures to remain on the property after
platting and their required setbacks from the proposed new property lines.
Response: There are ten (10) platted condominium lots (each with an associated tax lot number) with attached garages
existing within tax lot 90001, but not included as a part of tax lot 90001. Technically, no structures are existing on the
subject property, “Parcel B” of the Aster Condominiums Plat.
(10) The location and size of existing and proposed utilities and necessary easements and dedications on and
adjacent to the site, including, but not limited to, sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management
systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points.
Response: All utilities are existing and connection points will be addressed at time of final partition plat.
(11) The locations, widths and purpose of all existing or proposed easements on and abutting the proposed
land division; the location of any existing or proposed reserve strips.
Response: The locations of existing and proposed public and private utility easements are shown are the Tentative
Partition plan.
(12) The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or
limitations of the reservations clearly indicated.
Response: There is no proposed open space.
(B) A Site Assessment of the Entire Development Area. The Site Assessment shall be prepared by an Oregon
Licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer and drawn to scale with existing contours at 1 -foot intervals and
percent of slope that precisely maps and delineates the areas described below. Proposed modifications to
physical features shall be clearly indicated. The Director may waive portions of this requirement if there is a
finding that the proposed development will not have an adverse impact on physical features or water quality,
either on the site or adjacent to the site. Information required for adjacent properties may be generalized to
show the connections to physical features. A Site Assessment shall contain the following information.
Response: No site assessment is necessary as there is no development proposed.
(1) The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses that are
shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) Map on file in the Development and
Public Works Department;
Response: There are no watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses Map that encumber the
subject property.
4
(2) The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted
FEMA Flood Insurance Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map
Revision;
Response: According to FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 41039C1166F, the subject site is located in Zone X, an
area determined to be outside of the 500-year floodplain.
(3) The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3.200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection
Areas Map on file in the Development and Public Works Department;
Response: According to the Wellhead Protection Map, the subject property falls outside the Time of Travel Zone for
wellhead protection.
(4) Physical features including, but not limited to significant clusters of trees and shrubs,
watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their riparian areas, wetlands, and rock
outcroppings;
Response: There are no significant physical features such as clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses, riparian areas,
wetlands, or rock outcroppings located within the boundaries of the subject property.
(5) Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane
County; and
Response: The USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey indicates that the soil types covering the
subject property consist of sixty-three percent (63%) 105A – Pengra Silt Loam and thirty-seven (37%) 43C – Dixonville-
Philomath-Hazelair Complex. The depth to water table is more than 80 inches for Dixonville soils and 0 to 30 inches for
Pengra soils.
(6) Natural resource protection areas as specified in SDC 4.3.117.
Response: There are no natural resource protection areas present on the subject property.
(C) A Stormwater Management Plan drawn to scale with existing contours at 1 -foot intervals and percent of
slope that precisely maps and addresses the information described below. In areas where the percent of slope is
10 percent or more, contours may be shown at 5-foot intervals. This plan shall show the stormwater
management system for the entire development area. Unless exempt by the Director, the City shall require that
an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer prepare the plan. Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater
management system, an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect may also be required. The plan shall inc lude the
following components:
(1) Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations;
(2) Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns;
(3) The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited
to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and
natural drainageways to be retained.
(4) Existing and proposed site elevations, grades and contours; and
(5) A stormwater study and management system plan with supporting calculations and
5
documentation as required in SDC 4.3.110 shall be submitted supporting the proposed system. The
plan, calculations and documentation shall be consistent with the Engineering Designs Standards
and Procedures Manual to allow staff to determine if the proposed stormwater management
system will accomplish its purposes.
Response: Per advisement from public works staff (Clayton McEachern, PE), no Stormwater Management Plan is
required with this proposal.
(D) A response to transportation issues complying with the provisions of this code.
(1) The locations, condition, e.g., fully improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, AC mat, or gravel,
widths and names of all existing streets, alleys, or other rights -of-way within or adjacent to the
proposed land division;
Response: The attached Existing Conditions site plan indicates the above as applicable.
(2) The locations, widths and names of all proposed streets and other rights -of-way to include the
approximate radius of curves and grades. The relationship of all proposed streets to any
projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan or Springfield Comprehensive Plan, including the
Springfield Transportation System Plan (including the Conceptual Street M ap) and, any
approved Conceptual Development Plan;
Response. No new development, streets or otherwise, is proposed with this Tentative Partition plan.
(3) The locations and widths of all existing and proposed sidewalks, multi -use paths, and
accessways, including the location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required
planter strip;
Response: The location and widths of existing sidewalks adjacent to the subject property are shown on the Tentative
Partition plan. There are no existing multi-use paths, accessways, or planter strips; none are proposed.
(4) The location of existing and proposed traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities, where applicable;
Response: The above are indicated on the attached Existing Conditions Sheet, where applicable.
(5) The location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways demonstrating conformance
with lot or parcel dimensions and frontage requirements for single -family and duplex lots/parcels
established in SDC 3.2.215, and driveway width and separation specifications established in
SDC 4.2.120, where applicable;
Response: Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways are indicated on the attached Existing
Conditions site plan.
(6) The location of existing and proposed street trees, associated utilities along street frontage(s),
and street lighting: including the type, height and area of illumination;
Response: Existing streetlights are Cobra style Low Pressure Sodium lamps and are shown on the tentative partition
plan.
(7) The location of existing and proposed transit facilities;
Response: Closest transit facility is located on the south side of Thurston Rd, east on 68th St. Route 11 – Thurston.
6
(8) A copy of a Right-of-Way Approach Permit application where the property has frontage on an
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility; and
Response: The subject property is not adjacent to an ODOT facility.
(9) A Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Oregon Licensed Traffic Engineer, where necessary, as
specified in SDC 4.2.105(A)(4).
Response: A Traffic Impact Study is not necessary as no dwellings are proposed with this tentative partition.
(E) A Future Development Plan. Where phasing and/or lots/parcels that are more than twice the minimum
lot/parcel size are proposed, the Tentative Plan shall include a Future Development Plan that:
(1) Indicates the proposed redivision, including the boundaries, lot/parcel dimensions and
sequencing of each proposed redivision in any residential district, and shall include a plot plan
showing building footprints for compliance with the minimum residential densities specified in
SDC 3.2.205;
(2) Addresses street connectivity between the various phases of the proposed development based
upon compliance with the Springfield Transportation System Plan (including the Conceptual
Street Map), the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), applicable Refinement Plans, Plan
Districts, Master Plans, or this code;
(3) Accommodates other required public improvements, including, but not limited to, sanitary
sewer,
stormwater management, water and electricity;
(4) Addresses physical features, including, but not limited to, significant clusters of trees and
shrubs,
watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map and their associated
riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings and historic features; and
(5) Discusses the timing and financial provisions relating to phasing.
Response: No Future Development Plan is required.
(F) Additional information and/or applications required at the time of Tentative Plan application submittal shall
include the following items, where applicable:
(1) A brief narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed land division and the existing use of the
property;
Response: This written statement serves as the narrative describing the proposal in detail.
(2) If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required;
Response: The applicant, Aster-Kjessler, LLC, is the property owner.
7
(3) A Vicinity Map drawn to scale showing bus stops, streets, driveways, pedestrian connections, fire
hydrants, and other transportation/fire access issues within 200 feet of the proposed land
division and all existing Partitions or Subdivisions immediately adjacent to the proposed land
division;
Response: A vicinity map is shown on the attached Tentative Partition Plan.
(4) How the Tentative Plan addresses the standards of any applicable overlay district;
Response: No overlay districts apply to the subject property.
(5) How the Tentative Plan addresses Discretionary Use criteria, where applicable
Response: The proposed 2-Lot tentative partition within the R-1 zone is a permitted use according to SDC 3.2-210. No
Discretionary Use Permit is required.
(6) A Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19.100;
Response: No trees will be felled as a result of this Tentative Partition Plan.
(7) A Geotechnical Report for slopes of 15 percent or greater and as specified in SDC 3.3.500, and/or
if the required Site Assessment in SDC 5.12.120(B) indicates the proposed development area has
unstable soils and/or high water table as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County;
Response: There are no slopes greater than 15% on this site. Soils are not classified as unstable and water table is not
high; a site assessment is not required.
(8) An Annexation application as specified in SDC 5.7.100 where a development is proposed outside
of the city limits but within City’s urban growth boundary and can be serviced by sanitary sewer;
Response: The subject property is within the City of Springfield city limits.
(9) A wetland delineation approved by the Department of State Lands shall be submitted
concurrently where there is a wetland on the property;
Response: There are no existing wetlands on the subject property.
(10) Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved shall be
submitted concurrently;
Response: No Federal or State permits are required with this tentative Partition application.
(11) All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of
installation and method of financing;
Response: There are no public improvements proposed. The tentative partition is funded with private financing
resources.
8
(12) Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of a Homeowner’s Association Agreement, where
appropriate;
Response: No deed restrictions or Homeowner’s Association are proposed at this juncture.
(13) Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the
Director may waive certain submittal requirements specified in subsections (A) through (M).
However, the Tentative Plan shall address the applicable standards listed under the park
Subdivision approval criteria specified in SDC 5.12.125.
Response: This application is not proposing the Partition of a manufactured dwelling or mobile home park.
5.12.125 Tentative Plan Criteria.
The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that all
applicable criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director
shall deny the application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to a public agency, the Director
may waive any approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future
development application.
(A) The request conforms to the provisions of this code pertaining to lot/parcel size and dimensions.
Response: The applicant’s request to subdivide the subject property’s approximately 1.13 acres into two (2) lots
conforms with all provisions and mandatory minimum development standards for City of Springfield, R-1 zoned
properties, as specified in SDC 3.2-215.
(B) The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan
District map, and Conceptual Development Plan.
Response: The subject property is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential) for the City of Springfield, which is consistent
with the Metro Plan diagram.
(C) Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity;
sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be
exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless
otherwise provided for by this code and other applicable regulations. The Director or a utility provider shall
determine capacity issues.
Response: No development is proposed; capacity requirements will be addressed at time of potential future
development.
(D) The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction
standards contained in this code and other applicable regulations.
Response: This proposed 2-lot partition complies with all applicable public and private design and construction
standards contained in this SDC criteria, and all other applicable regulations. All existing public and private facilities
meet the design and construction standards of the SDC.
9
(E) Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas
with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW
Map and their associated riparian area s; other riparian areas and wetlands specified in SDC 4.3.117; rock
outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in
SDC 3.3.900 or ORS 97.740.760, 358.905.955 and 390.235.240, shall be protected as specified in this code or
in State or Federal law.
Response: Physical features as relevant are included on the attached Existing Conditions site plan.
(F) Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and
pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent
residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas;
minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this code or other applicable regulations
and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways.
Response: No new parking areas or ingress-egress points are proposed.
(G) Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished as specified
in this code.
Response: Development of any remainder of the subject property owned by Kjessler -Aster, LLC can be accomplished in
compliance with the Springfield Development Code.
(H) Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its development as specified in this code.
Response: Adjacent land either is, or can be, developed.
(I) Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the City’s urbanizable area and no
concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards specified below shall also apply.
(1) The minimum area for the partitioning of land in the UF -10 Overlay District shall be 10 acres.
(2) EXCEPTIONS:
(a) Any proposed new parcel between 5 and 10 acres shall require a Future Development Plan as
specified in SDC 5.12.120(E) for ultimate development with urban densities as required in this code.
(b) In addition to the standards of subsection (I)(2)(a), above, any proposed new parcel that is
less than 5 acres shall meet 1 of the following standards:
(i) The property to be partitioned shall be owned or operated by a governmental agency
or public utility; or
(ii) A majority of parcels located within 100 feet of the property to be partitioned shall be
smaller than 5 acres.
10
(iii) No more than 3 parcels shall be created from 1 tract of land while the property
remains within the UF-10 Overlay District.
EXCEPTION: Land within the UF-10 Overlay District may be partitioned more than once as long as no proposed
parcel is less than 5 acres in size.
Response: The subject property is within the City of Springfield city limits.
(J) Where the Partition of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the following
approval criteria apply:
(1) The park was approved before July 2, 2001 and is in compliance with the standards in SDC 3.2.235 or
other land use regulations in effect at the time the site was approved as a manufactured dwelling park or
mobile home park; or the park is an approved non-conforming use. In the latter case, a park is in
compliance if the City has not issued a notice of noncompliance on or before July 2, 2001.
(2) The number of lots proposed shall be the same or less than the number of mobile home spaces previously
approved or legally existing in the park.
(3) The external boundary or setbacks of the park shall not be changed.
(4) The use of lots, as shown on the Tentative Plan, shall be limited to the installation of manufactured
dwellings; i.e., “stick-built” houses are prohibited.
(5) Any other area in the Partition other than the proposed lots shall be used as common property, unless
park streets have previously been dedicated to the City or there are public utilities in the park. All
common property shall be addressed in a Homeowners’ Association Agreement.
(a) Areas that are used for vehicle circulation (streets), driveways that serve more than 2
lots/parcels
or common parking areas, shall be shown in a Tract or easement on the Tentative Plan.
(b) All other services and utilities that serve more than 1 lot shall be in a Tract or easement. Where a
service or utility serves only 1 lot, but crosses another, that service or utility shall also be in an
easement shown on the Tentative Plan.
(c) Existing buildings in the park used for recreational, meetings or other purposes for the park
residents shall be in a Tract shown on the Tentative Plan.
(6) Any public utilities shall be within a public utility easement.
(7) If public utilities or services are required to serve the Partition, the park owner shall sign and execute a
waiver of the right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district to provide the
public utilities or services. (6443)
Response: This proposal does not include a manufactured dwelling park/mobile home park; this criterion is not
applicable.
ATTN:
FEES:$400.00
ADDRESS:
$400.00
Michael
ACCOUNTS NOT PAID WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF ORIGINAL INVOICE WILL
BE CHARGED INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 1.5% PER MONTH (18% ANNUAL
PERCENTAGE RATE)
THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS, LET US KNOW IF WE CAN BE OF ANY FURTHER
ASSISTANCE.
Balance Due
PARTIAL BILLING
NYA A Street, Springfield, OR
PREPAID FEES:
3540 Walton Lane Client No.:
Eugene, OR 97408 RE:ASTER CONDO
Date:June 7, 023
Michael Kjessler Title No.:23-26559
P.O. BOX 931 ∙ SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.741.1981
FAX: 541.741.0619
www.evergreenlandtitle.com
P.O. BOX 10211 –EUGENE, OR
97440
PHONE: 541.687.9794
FAX: 541.687.0924
www.evergreenlandtitle.com
911 Country Club Rd, Ste 320 • Eugene, OR 97401
Phone: 541.741.1981
Fax: 541.741.0619
260 Country Club Rd, Ste 120 • Eugene, OR 97401
P.O. Box 10211 • Eugene, OR 97440
Phone: 541.687.9794
Fax: 541.687.0924
TITLE INSURANCE SERVICES • ESCROW CLOSINGS
June 07, 2023
Order No. 23-26559
PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT
Michael Kjessler
3540 Walton Ln
Eugene, OR 97408
Attn: Michael Kjessler
e-mail: mkjessler@gmail.com
Dear Michael Kjessler:
Partial Billing
Additional Chain
TOTAL
$400.00
$400.00
We are prepared to issue on request and on recording of the appropriate documents, a policy or policies
as applied for, with coverage's as indicated, based on this preliminary report.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO
Showing fee simple title as of May 26, 2023, at 8:00 a.m., vested in:
ASTER-KJESSLER LLC
Subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the
policy form. No liability is assumed until a full premium has been paid.
Order No.: 23-26559
Page 1 of 4
SCHEDULE B
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority
that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a
public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether
or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records.
Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be
ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof.
Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the public records; reservations or exceptions in
patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water.
Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or other facts which a
correct survey would disclose.
Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, material, equipment rental or workers compensation
heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records.
CURRENT EXCEPTIONS:
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
City liens, if any, City of Springfield.
Public Utility Easement as shown on the recorded plat.
The By-Laws, including the terms and provisions thereof, of Aster Condominiums, Recorded
March 12, 1980, Reception No. 8012589, Lane County Oregon Records.
Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions, but omitting restrictions, if any, based on race, color,
religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin,
ancestry, source of income, gender, gender identity, gender expression, medical condition or
genetic information, imposed by instrument, including the terms and provisions thereof, Recorded
March 21, 1980, Reception No. 8014491, Lane County Oregon Records.
Deed of Trust, including the terms and provisions thereof, executed by Michael B. Kjessler, as
Grantor(s), to Western Title & Escrow of Lane County, as Trustee, for the benefit of Selco
Community Credit Union, as Beneficiary, Dated August 6, 2020, Recorded August 7, 2020,
Reception No. 2020-043483, Official Records of Lane County Oregon, given to secure payment of
a Note for $1,360,000.00.
Said Deed of Trust was modified by instrument Recorded November 19, 2021, Reception No.
2021-072678, Lane County Oregon Records. (Includes Additional Property)
Assignment of Rents, as additional security for the payment of the indebtedness secured by the
Deed of Trust as Exception 12, which assignment was executed by Michael B. Kjessler, to Selco
Community Credit Union, by instrument Recorded August 7, 2020, Reception No. 2020-043484,
Lane County Oregon Records. (Includes Additional Property)
ORS 92.012 requires that any division of an existing parcel is a partition requiring Governmental
approval. Title Insurance coverage does not include assurances that any lot conveyed is a legal
lot for planning purposes. Therefore, if the proposed transaction includes a division of an existing
parcel, you should consult with the applicable planning authority as to any requirements they may
have as to the proposed transaction.
NOTE: Taxes, Map No. 17-02-34-44-90001, Code 19-00, Account No. 1355161, 2022-2023,
$0.00, paid in full.
Order No.: 23-26559
Page 2 of 4
NOTE: The address of the property to be insured herein is: NYA S A Street, Springfield, OR
97478.
NOTE: A Judgment/Lien/Bankruptcy Search was done for the name(s) MICHAEL B. KJESSLER
and ASTER-KJESSLER, LLC, and as of May 26, 2023, none were found.
INFORMATIONAL NOTE: EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY FINDS NO NOTICE OF
RESCISSION RECORDED IN THE LAST 24 MONTHS.
NOTE: The following applicable recording fees will be charged by Lane County:
First Page:$87.00
Each Additional Page $ 5.00
Non-Standard Document Fee $20.00
E-Recording Fee $ 5.00
INFORMATIONAL NOTE: The current vesting deed and all changes back to the deed which
vests ownership 24 months ago are as follows:
BARGAIN AND SALE DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 22, 2022, FROM MICHAEL B.
KJESSLER, TO ASTER-KJESSLER, LLC, RECEPTION NO. 2022-040226.
WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 7, 2020, FROM JOSHUA J. ECKSTINE, TO MICHAEL
B. KJESSLER, RECEPTION NO. 2020-043482.
NOTE: Due to current conflicts or potential conflicts between state and federal law, which conflicts
may extend to local law, regarding marijuana, if the transaction to be insured involves property
which is currently used or is to be used in connection with a marijuana enterprise, including but
not limited to the cultivation, storage, distribution, transport, manufacture, or sale of marijuana
and/or products containing marijuana, the Company declines to close or insure the transaction,
and this Preliminary Title Report shall automatically be considered null and void and of no force
and effect.
Very truly yours,
EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY
HOME OFFICE
By:
Andrew Rollins
Title Officer
cc:
Metro Planning
NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREUNDER UNTIL POLICY IS ISSUED AND PREMIUM PAID. IF FOR
ANY REASON THE REPORT IS CANCELLED, A MINIMUM CANCELLATION FEE OF $200.00 WILL BE
CHARGED.
Order No.: 23-26559
Page 3 of 4
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Parcel B, ASTER CONDOMINIUMS, as platted and recorded in File 73, Slides 358 and 359, Lane County
Oregon Plat Records, in Lane County, Oregon, as set forth in Declaration of Ownership, re-recorded
March 21, 1980, Document No. 80-14491, Lane County Oregon Records, in Lane County, Oregon.
Order No.: 23-26559
Page 4 of 4