The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication Applicant 11/22/2023Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Prospective Applicant Name: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: Prospective Applicant’s Rep.: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: Property Owner: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: TAX LOT NO(S): Property Address: Size of Property: Acres Square Feet Description of Proposal: If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Existing Use: # of Lots/Parcels: Avg. Lot/Parcel Size: sf Density: du/acre Prospective Applicant: Date: Signature Print Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: complete this section) Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $0 Postage Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application  The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet.  Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday.  We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application.  The applicant’s proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting  The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting.  The meeting is scheduled for one hour.  Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed.  The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist Application Fee – refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. Development Issues Meeting Application Form Five (5) Questions – list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions – Partitions & Subdivisions – Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11” x 17” Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1” = 30’, 1” = 50’ or 1” = 100’ North arrow Date of preparation Street address and assessor’s map and tax lot number Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces Parking and circulation plan 21 November 2023 PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING | QUESTIONS PATHOLOGY CONSULTANTS, PC P. O. Box 72059 Springﬁeld, Oregon 97475 William A. Randall ARBOR SOUTH ARCHITECTURE, PC 380 Lincoln Street Eugene, Oregon 97401 NARRRATIVE Pathology Consultants is desiring to relocate into a new facility. The existing church located at 1533 Market Street is being considered by PC for purchase and conversion for use as a medical laboratory facility. The property is currently zoned R-1, low density residential and it is assumed that the church is either operating under a Discretionary Use Permit or is a pre-existing non-conforming use. Medical laboratories would most likely ﬁt under “Ofﬁces and Clinics” under any of the commercial zones. Neighborhood Commercial seems the most likely ﬁt for this proposed use. QUESTIONS 1.May we assume a medical laboratory use will be deﬁned as “Ofﬁces and Clinics” under the SDC 3.2.320? It seems like it would, given the listings in SDC 3.2.315(C). 2.We also assume the Neighborhood Commercial zone does NOT require an underlying Metro Plan Amendment and is considered a “ﬂoating zone.” There would thus be no need for an underlying Metro Plan change of designation, correct? 3.On the enclosed site plan, we show a schematic layout of the building for the intended use. The NC zone at SDC Table 3.2.325(B) also has a maximum height limit of 20 feet. It appears the steeple is possibly the only portion exceeding the height limit. Would it be “grandfathered” in as pre-existing? 4.We will perform a traf ﬁc study. Both streets (Market and Carter) appear to be local streets. However, mixed use commercial zones are 120 ft south and high density residential is immediately across Carter street from the site. Mohawk Boulevard (a Minor Arterial) is about 500 ft to the east. What major issues or criteria will be germane to rezoning this parcel to NC? 5.Are there any other “red ﬂags” or obvious items you see that we will need to address beyond the obvious? SITE