The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMeeting Packet Planner 11/29/2023DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING FORM APPLICANT: Pathology Consultants MEETING DATE/TIME: Thursday, December 21, 2023 1:30 p.m. PLACE: DPW Conference Room 615/616 and Virtual via Zoom CONTACT PERSON: Tom Sievers 726-2333 Current Planning Staff: L Miller, A Limbird, M Rust, K Notary, T Sievers Stan Petroff, AIC City Engineer – DPW Kristi Krueger, AIC Managing Civil Engineer – DPW Ken Vogeney, Emergency Manager – DPW Clayton McEachern, Civil Engineer, Development & Public Works Matt Stouder, Environmental Services Div. Manager/MWMC General Manager Kristi Krueger, Capital Engineering Manager, Development & Public Works Michael Liebler, Transportation Planning, Civil Engineer, Development & Public Works Gilbert Gordon, Deputy Fire Marshall 2, Fire & Life Safety Department Ben Gibson, Maintenance Supervisor, Development & Public Works Eric Adams, Planning, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Ladd Boyce, Keoki Lapina, Springfield Utility Board (Water) Greg Miller, Springfield Utility Board (Water) Sanjeev King, Nick Amann, Springfield Utility Board (Electric) Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board (DWP) Thomas Jeffreys, (EPUD) Emerald Peoples Utility District Michael Wargo, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Matt Caswell, Planning & Development Manager, ODOT, State Highway Division (odotr2planmgr@odot.state.or.us) Brad Rudler, (Electric) Eugene Water and Electric Board Tyler Lindley, Eugene Water and Electric Board Wallace McCullough, (Water), Eugene Water and Electric Board Brett Yancey, Chief Operations Officer; Springfield Public Schools Chris Reiersgaard, Asst. Director of Facilities & Operations; Springfield Public Schools Safe Routes to School, Springfield Public Schools Chris Carpenter, DPW Building Official Andrew Shearer, Police Chief, Police Department Tom Schwetz, LTD, Planning and Development Director Luke Pilon, CenturyLink Jeff Paschall, Community Development Manager – DPW Jeremy Sherer, City Surveyor – DPW Meghan Murphy, Program Coordinator, Environmental Services Sasha Vartanian, Lane County Transportation - send to LCPWTPReferrals@lanecounty.gov ONLY Marie Longworth, Central Lane Communications 911 Monte Brown, Northwest Natural Gas Jason McDonald, Comcast Cable Jamie Porter, Rainbow Water District Kristina Kraaz, City Attorney (Mary Bridget Smith upon specific request) Allie Camp, Economic Development Sarah Weaver, Administrative Specialist (DIM Annexations) Please mark who you would like to attend this meeting and return form and file to Shannon. Thanks! Revised: 06/08/2020 DEVELOPMENT INITIATION MEETING DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD CITY HALL 225 FIFTH STREET DPW Conference Room 615/616 + Zoom Meeting Date: Thursday, December 21, 2023 1:30 – 2:30 1. DEVELOPMENT INITIATION MTG #811-23-000268-PRE 811-23-000273-PROJ Pathology Consultants Assessor’s Map: 17-03-25-33 TL: 8400 Address: 1533 Market St. Existing Use: Church building Applicant has submitted proposal for conversion of church to medical lab Planner: Tom Sievers The Development Issues Meeting informational packet for this meeting is available on-line for you to review or print out @ Laserfiche website: www.springfield-or.gov/weblink8/browse.aspx SITE VICINITY MAP 811-23-000268-PRE Development Initiation Meeting 17-03-25-33 TL 8400 1533 Market St. Pathology Consultants Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Prospective Applicant Name: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: Prospective Applicant’s Rep.: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: Property Owner: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: TAX LOT NO(S): Property Address: Size of Property: Acres Square Feet Description of Proposal: If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Existing Use: # of Lots/Parcels: Avg. Lot/Parcel Size: sf Density: du/acre Prospective Applicant: Date: Signature Print Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: complete this section) Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $0 Postage Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application  The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet.  Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday.  We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application.  The applicant’s proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting  The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting.  The meeting is scheduled for one hour.  Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed.  The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist Application Fee – refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. Development Issues Meeting Application Form Five (5) Questions – list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions – Partitions & Subdivisions – Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11” x 17” Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1” = 30’, 1” = 50’ or 1” = 100’ North arrow Date of preparation Street address and assessor’s map and tax lot number Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces Parking and circulation plan 21 November 2023 PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING | QUESTIONS PATHOLOGY CONSULTANTS, PC P. O. Box 72059 Springﬁeld, Oregon 97475 William A. Randall ARBOR SOUTH ARCHITECTURE, PC 380 Lincoln Street Eugene, Oregon 97401 NARRRATIVE Pathology Consultants is desiring to relocate into a new facility. The existing church located at 1533 Market Street is being considered by PC for purchase and conversion for use as a medical laboratory facility. The property is currently zoned R-1, low density residential and it is assumed that the church is either operating under a Discretionary Use Permit or is a pre-existing non-conforming use. Medical laboratories would most likely ﬁt under “Ofﬁces and Clinics” under any of the commercial zones. Neighborhood Commercial seems the most likely ﬁt for this proposed use. QUESTIONS 1.May we assume a medical laboratory use will be deﬁned as “Ofﬁces and Clinics” under the SDC 3.2.320? It seems like it would, given the listings in SDC 3.2.315(C). 2.We also assume the Neighborhood Commercial zone does NOT require an underlying Metro Plan Amendment and is considered a “ﬂoating zone.” There would thus be no need for an underlying Metro Plan change of designation, correct? 3.On the enclosed site plan, we show a schematic layout of the building for the intended use. The NC zone at SDC Table 3.2.325(B) also has a maximum height limit of 20 feet. It appears the steeple is possibly the only portion exceeding the height limit. Would it be “grandfathered” in as pre-existing? 4.We will perform a traf ﬁc study. Both streets (Market and Carter) appear to be local streets. However, mixed use commercial zones are 120 ft south and high density residential is immediately across Carter street from the site. Mohawk Boulevard (a Minor Arterial) is about 500 ft to the east. What major issues or criteria will be germane to rezoning this parcel to NC? 5.Are there any other “red ﬂags” or obvious items you see that we will need to address beyond the obvious? SITE VICINITY MAP 811-23-000268-PRE Development Initiation Meeting 17-03-25-33 TL 8400 1533 Market St. Pathology Consultants DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING FORM APPLICANT: Pathology Consultants MEETING DATE/TIME: Thursday, December 21, 2023 1:30 p.m. PLACE: DPW Conference Room 615/616 and Virtual via Zoom CONTACT PERSON: Tom Sievers 726-2333 Current Planning Staff: L Miller, A Limbird, M Rust, K Notary, T Sievers Stan Petroff, AIC City Engineer – DPW Kristi Krueger, AIC Managing Civil Engineer – DPW Ken Vogeney, Emergency Manager – DPW Clayton McEachern, Civil Engineer, Development & Public Works Matt Stouder, Environmental Services Div. Manager/MWMC General Manager Kristi Krueger, Capital Engineering Manager, Development & Public Works Michael Liebler, Transportation Planning, Civil Engineer, Development & Public Works Gilbert Gordon, Deputy Fire Marshall 2, Fire & Life Safety Department Ben Gibson, Maintenance Supervisor, Development & Public Works Eric Adams, Planning, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Ladd Boyce, Keoki Lapina, Springfield Utility Board (Water) Greg Miller, Springfield Utility Board (Water) Sanjeev King, Nick Amann, Springfield Utility Board (Electric) Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board (DWP) Thomas Jeffreys, (EPUD) Emerald Peoples Utility District Michael Wargo, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Matt Caswell, Planning & Development Manager, ODOT, State Highway Division (odotr2planmgr@odot.state.or.us) Brad Rudler, (Electric) Eugene Water and Electric Board Tyler Lindley, Eugene Water and Electric Board Wallace McCullough, (Water), Eugene Water and Electric Board Brett Yancey, Chief Operations Officer; Springfield Public Schools Chris Reiersgaard, Asst. Director of Facilities & Operations; Springfield Public Schools Safe Routes to School, Springfield Public Schools Chris Carpenter, DPW Building Official Andrew Shearer, Police Chief, Police Department Tom Schwetz, LTD, Planning and Development Director Luke Pilon, CenturyLink Jeff Paschall, Community Development Manager – DPW Jeremy Sherer, City Surveyor – DPW Meghan Murphy, Program Coordinator, Environmental Services Sasha Vartanian, Lane County Transportation - send to LCPWTPReferrals@lanecounty.gov ONLY Marie Longworth, Central Lane Communications 911 Monte Brown, Northwest Natural Gas Jason McDonald, Comcast Cable Jamie Porter, Rainbow Water District Kristina Kraaz, City Attorney (Mary Bridget Smith upon specific request) Allie Camp, Economic Development Sarah Weaver, Administrative Specialist (DIM Annexations) Please mark who you would like to attend this meeting and return form and file to Shannon. Thanks! Revised: 06/08/2020 DEVELOPMENT INITIATION MEETING DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD CITY HALL 225 FIFTH STREET DPW Conference Room 615/616 + Zoom Meeting Date: Thursday, December 21, 2023 1:30 – 2:30 1. DEVELOPMENT INITIATION MTG #811-23-000268-PRE 811-23-000273-PROJ Pathology Consultants Assessor’s Map: 17-03-25-33 TL: 8400 Address: 1533 Market St. Existing Use: Church building Applicant has submitted proposal for conversion of church to medical lab Planner: Tom Sievers The Development Issues Meeting informational packet for this meeting is available on-line for you to review or print out @ Laserfiche website: www.springfield-or.gov/weblink8/browse.aspx SITE VICINITY MAP 811-23-000268-PRE Development Initiation Meeting 17-03-25-33 TL 8400 1533 Market St. Pathology Consultants Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Prospective Applicant Name: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: Prospective Applicant’s Rep.: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: Property Owner: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: TAX LOT NO(S): Property Address: Size of Property: Acres Square Feet Description of Proposal: If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Existing Use: # of Lots/Parcels: Avg. Lot/Parcel Size: sf Density: du/acre Prospective Applicant: Date: Signature Print Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: complete this section) Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $0 Postage Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application  The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet.  Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday.  We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application.  The applicant’s proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting  The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting.  The meeting is scheduled for one hour.  Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed.  The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist Application Fee – refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. Development Issues Meeting Application Form Five (5) Questions – list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions – Partitions & Subdivisions – Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11” x 17” Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1” = 30’, 1” = 50’ or 1” = 100’ North arrow Date of preparation Street address and assessor’s map and tax lot number Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces Parking and circulation plan 21 November 2023 PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING | QUESTIONS PATHOLOGY CONSULTANTS, PC P. O. Box 72059 Springﬁeld, Oregon 97475 William A. Randall ARBOR SOUTH ARCHITECTURE, PC 380 Lincoln Street Eugene, Oregon 97401 NARRRATIVE Pathology Consultants is desiring to relocate into a new facility. The existing church located at 1533 Market Street is being considered by PC for purchase and conversion for use as a medical laboratory facility. The property is currently zoned R-1, low density residential and it is assumed that the church is either operating under a Discretionary Use Permit or is a pre-existing non-conforming use. Medical laboratories would most likely ﬁt under “Ofﬁces and Clinics” under any of the commercial zones. Neighborhood Commercial seems the most likely ﬁt for this proposed use. QUESTIONS 1.May we assume a medical laboratory use will be deﬁned as “Ofﬁces and Clinics” under the SDC 3.2.320? It seems like it would, given the listings in SDC 3.2.315(C). 2.We also assume the Neighborhood Commercial zone does NOT require an underlying Metro Plan Amendment and is considered a “ﬂoating zone.” There would thus be no need for an underlying Metro Plan change of designation, correct? 3.On the enclosed site plan, we show a schematic layout of the building for the intended use. The NC zone at SDC Table 3.2.325(B) also has a maximum height limit of 20 feet. It appears the steeple is possibly the only portion exceeding the height limit. Would it be “grandfathered” in as pre-existing? 4.We will perform a traf ﬁc study. Both streets (Market and Carter) appear to be local streets. However, mixed use commercial zones are 120 ft south and high density residential is immediately across Carter street from the site. Mohawk Boulevard (a Minor Arterial) is about 500 ft to the east. What major issues or criteria will be germane to rezoning this parcel to NC? 5.Are there any other “red ﬂags” or obvious items you see that we will need to address beyond the obvious? DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING FORM APPLICANT: Pathology Consultants MEETING DATE/TIME: Thursday, December 21, 2023 1:30 p.m. PLACE: DPW Conference Room 615/616 and Virtual via Zoom CONTACT PERSON: Tom Sievers 744-2333 Current Planning Staff: L Miller, A Limbird, M Rust, K Notary, T Sievers Stan Petroff, AIC City Engineer – DPW Kristi Krueger, AIC Managing Civil Engineer – DPW Ken Vogeney, Emergency Manager – DPW Clayton McEachern, Civil Engineer, Development & Public Works Matt Stouder, Environmental Services Div. Manager/MWMC General Manager Kristi Krueger, Capital Engineering Manager, Development & Public Works Michael Liebler, Transportation Planning, Civil Engineer, Development & Public Works Gilbert Gordon, Deputy Fire Marshall 2, Fire & Life Safety Department Ben Gibson, Maintenance Supervisor, Development & Public Works Eric Adams, Planning, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Ladd Boyce, Keoki Lapina, Springfield Utility Board (Water) Greg Miller, Springfield Utility Board (Water) Sanjeev King, Nick Amann, Springfield Utility Board (Electric) Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board (DWP) Thomas Jeffreys, (EPUD) Emerald Peoples Utility District Michael Wargo, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Matt Caswell, Planning & Development Manager, ODOT, State Highway Division (odotr2planmgr@odot.state.or.us) Brad Rudler, (Electric) Eugene Water and Electric Board Tyler Lindley, Eugene Water and Electric Board Wallace McCullough, (Water), Eugene Water and Electric Board Brett Yancey, Chief Operations Officer; Springfield Public Schools Chris Reiersgaard, Asst. Director of Facilities & Operations; Springfield Public Schools Safe Routes to School, Springfield Public Schools Chris Carpenter, DPW Building Official Andrew Shearer, Police Chief, Police Department Tom Schwetz, LTD, Planning and Development Director Luke Pilon, CenturyLink Jeff Paschall, Community Development Manager – DPW Jeremy Sherer, City Surveyor – DPW Meghan Murphy, Program Coordinator, Environmental Services Sasha Vartanian, Lane County Transportation - send to LCPWTPReferrals@lanecounty.gov ONLY Marie Longworth, Central Lane Communications 911 Monte Brown, Northwest Natural Gas Jason McDonald, Comcast Cable Jamie Porter, Rainbow Water District Kristina Kraaz, City Attorney (Mary Bridget Smith upon specific request) Allie Camp, Economic Development Sarah Weaver, Administrative Specialist (DIM Annexations) Please mark who you would like to attend this meeting and return form and file to Shannon. Thanks! Revised: 06/08/2020 DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING FORM APPLICANT: Pathology Consultants MEETING DATE/TIME: Thursday, December 21, 2023 1:30 p.m. PLACE: DPW Conference Room 615/616 and Virtual via Zoom CONTACT PERSON: Tom Sievers 726-2333 Current Planning Staff: L Miller, A Limbird, M Rust, K Notary, T Sievers Stan Petroff, AIC City Engineer – DPW Kristi Krueger, AIC Managing Civil Engineer – DPW Ken Vogeney, Emergency Manager – DPW Clayton McEachern, Civil Engineer, Development & Public Works Matt Stouder, Environmental Services Div. Manager/MWMC General Manager Kristi Krueger, Capital Engineering Manager, Development & Public Works Michael Liebler, Transportation Planning, Civil Engineer, Development & Public Works Gilbert Gordon, Deputy Fire Marshall 2, Fire & Life Safety Department Ben Gibson, Maintenance Supervisor, Development & Public Works Eric Adams, Planning, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Ladd Boyce, Keoki Lapina, Springfield Utility Board (Water) Greg Miller, Springfield Utility Board (Water) Sanjeev King, Nick Amann, Springfield Utility Board (Electric) Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board (DWP) Thomas Jeffreys, (EPUD) Emerald Peoples Utility District Michael Wargo, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Matt Caswell, Planning & Development Manager, ODOT, State Highway Division (odotr2planmgr@odot.state.or.us) Brad Rudler, (Electric) Eugene Water and Electric Board Tyler Lindley, Eugene Water and Electric Board Wallace McCullough, (Water), Eugene Water and Electric Board Brett Yancey, Chief Operations Officer; Springfield Public Schools Chris Reiersgaard, Asst. Director of Facilities & Operations; Springfield Public Schools Safe Routes to School, Springfield Public Schools Chris Carpenter, DPW Building Official Andrew Shearer, Police Chief, Police Department Tom Schwetz, LTD, Planning and Development Director Luke Pilon, CenturyLink Jeff Paschall, Community Development Manager – DPW Jeremy Sherer, City Surveyor – DPW Meghan Murphy, Program Coordinator, Environmental Services Sasha Vartanian, Lane County Transportation - send to LCPWTPReferrals@lanecounty.gov ONLY Marie Longworth, Central Lane Communications 911 Monte Brown, Northwest Natural Gas Jason McDonald, Comcast Cable Jamie Porter, Rainbow Water District Kristina Kraaz, City Attorney (Mary Bridget Smith upon specific request) Allie Camp, Economic Development Sarah Weaver, Administrative Specialist (DIM Annexations) Please mark who you would like to attend this meeting and return form and file to Shannon. Thanks! Revised: 06/08/2020 DEVELOPMENT INITIATION MEETING DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD CITY HALL 225 FIFTH STREET DPW Conference Room 615/616 + Zoom Meeting Date: Thursday, December 21, 2023 1:30 – 2:30 1. DEVELOPMENT INITIATION MTG #811-23-000268-PRE 811-23-000273-PROJ Pathology Consultants Assessor’s Map: 17-03-25-33 TL: 8400 Address: 1533 Market St. Existing Use: Church building Applicant has submitted proposal for conversion of church to medical lab Planner: Tom Sievers The Development Issues Meeting informational packet for this meeting is available on-line for you to review or print out @ Laserfiche website: www.springfield-or.gov/weblink8/browse.aspx http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/CurrentDevelopmentDivsion.htm Transaction Receipt Record ID: 811-23-000268-PRE Receipt Number: 491098 Receipt Date: 11/22/23 City of Springfield Development and Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 541-726-3753 Fax: 541-726-3689 permitcenter@springfield-or.gov IVR Number: 811080615463 Worksite address: 1533 MARKET ST, SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Parcel: 1703253308400 Fees Paid Transaction date Units Description Account code Paid amountFee amount 11/22/23 Planning Development Initiation Meeting City & UGB 100-00000-425002-1039 $678.00 $678.00 1.00 Ea Payment Method: Credit card authorization: 06266Q Payer: William A Randall Payment Amount:$678.00 Receipt Total: $678.00 Paid through ePermitting website Printed: 11/22/23 9:40 am Page 1 of 1 FIN_TransactionReceipt_pr Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Prospective Applicant Name: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: Prospective Applicant’s Rep.: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: Property Owner: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: TAX LOT NO(S): Property Address: Size of Property: Acres Square Feet Description of Proposal: If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Existing Use: # of Lots/Parcels: Avg. Lot/Parcel Size: sf Density: du/acre Prospective Applicant: Date: Signature Print Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: complete this section) Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $0 Postage Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application  The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet.  Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday.  We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application.  The applicant’s proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting  The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting.  The meeting is scheduled for one hour.  Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed.  The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist Application Fee – refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. Development Issues Meeting Application Form Five (5) Questions – list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions – Partitions & Subdivisions – Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11” x 17” Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1” = 30’, 1” = 50’ or 1” = 100’ North arrow Date of preparation Street address and assessor’s map and tax lot number Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces Parking and circulation plan 21 November 2023 PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING | QUESTIONS PATHOLOGY CONSULTANTS, PC P. O. Box 72059 Springﬁeld, Oregon 97475 William A. Randall ARBOR SOUTH ARCHITECTURE, PC 380 Lincoln Street Eugene, Oregon 97401 NARRRATIVE Pathology Consultants is desiring to relocate into a new facility. The existing church located at 1533 Market Street is being considered by PC for purchase and conversion for use as a medical laboratory facility. The property is currently zoned R-1, low density residential and it is assumed that the church is either operating under a Discretionary Use Permit or is a pre-existing non-conforming use. Medical laboratories would most likely ﬁt under “Ofﬁces and Clinics” under any of the commercial zones. Neighborhood Commercial seems the most likely ﬁt for this proposed use. QUESTIONS 1.May we assume a medical laboratory use will be deﬁned as “Ofﬁces and Clinics” under the SDC 3.2.320? It seems like it would, given the listings in SDC 3.2.315(C). 2.We also assume the Neighborhood Commercial zone does NOT require an underlying Metro Plan Amendment and is considered a “ﬂoating zone.” There would thus be no need for an underlying Metro Plan change of designation, correct? 3.On the enclosed site plan, we show a schematic layout of the building for the intended use. The NC zone at SDC Table 3.2.325(B) also has a maximum height limit of 20 feet. It appears the steeple is possibly the only portion exceeding the height limit. Would it be “grandfathered” in as pre-existing? 4.We will perform a traf ﬁc study. Both streets (Market and Carter) appear to be local streets. However, mixed use commercial zones are 120 ft south and high density residential is immediately across Carter street from the site. Mohawk Boulevard (a Minor Arterial) is about 500 ft to the east. What major issues or criteria will be germane to rezoning this parcel to NC? 5.Are there any other “red ﬂags” or obvious items you see that we will need to address beyond the obvious? PROGRESS SETNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSD1 SHEET NO MEMBERS OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS REVISION CHECKED BY DRAWN BY DATE JOB NO. INDEX PROJECT 380 Lincoln Street Eugene, Oregon 97401 Phone: 541-344-3332 arborsouth.com PATHOLOGY CONSULTANTS 1533 MARKET STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR SCHEMATIC DESIGN 2323 20 November 2023 BRYAN BILL © Arbor South Architecture, P.C. Client - 2323 △ Arbor South Architecture SPECIMEN REC. (OLD= 198) 226 sq ft STAINING 226 sq ft JEAN'S OFFICE 145 sq ft MOLECULAR 560 sq ft WAREHOUSE & STORAGE 782 sq ft GROSSING (OLD= 157) 213 sq ft TISSUE PROCESSING (OLD= 130) 438 sq ft HISTOLOGY (OLD = 610) 1,145 sq ft TURN OUT (OLD= 100) 150 sq ft I.H.C. 240 sq ft KITCHEN 461 sq ft BREAK ROOM 211 sq ft CONFERENCE ROOM 917 sq ft CYTK 1 107 sq ft CYTK 2 107 sq ft OPEN A:688 sq ft OFFICE PATH 4 147 sq ft OFFICE PATH 5 147 sq ft OFFICE PATH 6 147 sq ft OFFICE PATH 7 147 sq ft ERIK 124 sq ft SARAH 75 sq ft TRISH 75 sq ft BATHROOMw/ SHWR71 sq ftBATHROOMw/ SHWR71 sq ftNURSING 35 sq ft HIM 755 sq ft MANAGER 57 sq ft COURIERS 57 sq ft LEAD 57 sq ft LIS 49 sq ft MECHANICAL A:246 sq ft MEN'SBATHROOMA:97 sq ftWOMEN'S BATHROOM A:193 sq ft ??? A:150 sq ft STORAGE A:62 sq ft STORAGEA:52 sq ftFLOW (OLD= 859/704) 1,034 sq ft CYTK 3 107 sq ft OFFICE PATH 1 144 sq ft OFFICE PATH 2 147 sq ft OFFICE PATH 3 149 sq ft JASMINE 75 sq ft FNA CLINIC A:363 sq ft IT STAGING OPEN 142 sq ft DAVID 40 sq ft BRIAN 40 sq ftBILLINGCUBICLE32 sq ftBILLINGCUBICLE32 sq ftBILLINGCUBICLE32 sq ftOUTSIDE DOG PARK A:1,071 sq ft P A T HO L O G Y C O NS UL T A NT S - MA R K E T ST R EET C H UR C H S C HE MA T IC F L O O R P L A N S C A L E : 1/8" = 1'-0"14,295 SQ FT MAIN FLOOR T A XLOT : 17 032533084 00 INITIA L CL IE NT L A Y O UT P R O P O S A L ALL SIZES A S S UME D BA SED O N SCA L ED DR A W ING SUP PLIED BY CLIENT. DIME NSIONS , ME A N S OF EGR ESS, ETC. HA V E Y ET T O BE VERIFIED. TOTA L P R O G R A MME D SP A CE - A P P ROX 10,280 P R OGR A M NOT ES: P A T HOL OGIST OFF ICES - 7 CUR R E NT L Y P R OP OSED, SIZES W O R K F OR EX IST ING D E S K S STA FF OF F ICES - P LEA SE V ERIFY NA ME OF OF F ICE S P A CE NEX T T O SA R A H A ND TRISH. P R EV IOUS P R O JECT HA D OF F ICES F OR T O M A ND KRISTI, NO T P R ESENT IN CUR R ENT P R OP OS A L M.R. CUB ICL E S - 8 C UB ICL E S T OT A L ING 3 6 0 SQ.FT. IN P R EV IOUS P R OJECT , N O T SPECIF IED IN C UR R E NT P R OP OSA L BILLING - CUR R ENT P R OP OSA L HA S 3 CUBICL ES A P P R OX 9 6 SQ.FT. , P R EV IOUS P R OJECT HA D 4 0 0 SQ.FT. T E CHNOL OG Y - SER V ER R O O M NO SPECIFIED ST OR A GE - 7 80 SQ.FT P R OP OS ED W ITH A P P R OX 2 6 0 SQ.FT. EX IST ING GE NE R IC ST OR A GE. A CT UA L VS. A VA ILA BLE ST OR A GE NE E D S S HO UL D BE V ERIFIED A S A P A R T OF NEX T P HA SE O F S CHEMA T IC DESIGN P A T HO L O G Y C O NS UL T A NT S - MA R K E T ST R EET C H UR C H SITE