Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication Applicant 9/5/2023City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW - TYPE 2 6 SPRINGFIE D Application o Site Plan Review Completeness Check ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal ❑ Final Site Plan Submittal Required Project Information (Applicant: Applicant Name: Niles Hanson Complete this Section) Phone: 541-747-0034 Company: Rosen Sunvisor Systems Email: Niles@nwstamping.com Address: 4884 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403 Applicants Rep: Jimi Witt Phone: 541-338-9488 x1006 Company: Johnson Broderick Engineering Email: jimi@jbe.us.com Address: 325 West 13th Avenue, Eugene, OR 97401 Property Owner: Niles Hanson Phone: 541-747-0034 Company: Rosen Sunvisor Systems Email: Niles@nwstamping.com Address: 4884 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-03-3-14 TAX LOT NO (S): 2000 & 2001 Property Address (if applicable): 4884 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403 rty: Size of Property: 1.77 P � Sq.F[ Units Per Acre: N/A Proposed Project Name: New Storage Addition Proposal: See attached Existing Use: Light Medium Industrial New Impervious Area (Sq. Ft.): 0 Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: Associated Applications: Complete This Section) Placard: Case No: Date: Reviewed By: Application Fee: $ Tech Fee: $ Notice Fee: $ TOTAL FEE: $ PROJECT NO: 1 represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. 1 affirm the Information Identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided If not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the Information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 22].1]8 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: Date: 8 -t1 -,Z-5 Signature N11.E6 dl�� Print ' Date: -C C'T, Signature aLL, S 14Ar 5rA-\ Print Type 2 — Site Plan Review Application Process A. A Type 2 application involves the Director's interpretation and exercise of discretion when evaluating approval standards. Uses or development evaluated through this process are uses that are conditionally permitted or allowed after Director review that may require the imposition of conditions of approval to ensure compliance with development and approval standards. (SDC 5.1.415(A)). B. A Type 2 decision is made by the Director after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed. A Type 2 application is reviewed according to the procedures below, unless the Director determines that the application should be reviewed as a Type 3 decision. A Type 2 decision may be appealed according to SDC 5.1.800. (SDC 5.1.415(B)). C. When application materials are over 20 pages in length, an applicant must provide an identical electronic version and hard copy of the submitted materials. (SDC 5.1.215(B)(2)). 1. Site Plan Review Completeness Check Meeting • The purpose of the completeness check meeting is to determine whether the proposed development application is complete prior to acceptance of the application for processing by the City. A complete application is required for the review process. • The completeness check meeting will examine if the submittal standards of SDC 5.1.220 and 5.17.115 are met. • A completeness check meeting is required for all Type 2 and 3 land use applications. • Completeness Check Meetings are typically held within five to seven working days of application submittal. • The application must conform with Application Submittal Standards in SDC 5.1.220, the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements found in the SDC 5.17.155, and the Checklist provided in this form below. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Completeness Check Meeting • The applicant, owner, and associated design team are strongly encouraged to attend the Completeness Check meeting, however it is not required. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. • The Case Planner provides the applicant with a Completeness Check Meeting Checklist specifying items required to make the application complete. • The applicant has 180 days to submit a complete Site Plan Review application to the city; a second Completeness Check meeting is required after the 180 days. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application • The application must conform with the Application Submittal Standards in SDC 5.1.220, the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements found in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.17.155, and the Checklist provided below. • An application will be reviewed for completeness in accordance with SDC 5.1.405. • A Type 2 decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 12 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official, as applicable. Type 2 - Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist Please Note: • All the following items MUST be submitted. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why in the attached narrative. • When application or appeal materials are over 20 pages in length, an applicant must provide an identical electronic version and hard copy of the submitted materials. ❑ Site Plan Review Application Form ❑ Application Fee - Refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. ❑ An electronic copy of all application materials (USB drive or other) submitted at the time of application (if total submittal package is over 20 pages). ❑ Proof of ownership, e.g., deed or other recorded document ❑ Concurrent applications where a proposal involves more than one (1) application ❑ State or Federal Permit Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Completed Attached Stormwater Scoping Sheet One (1) Hard Copy of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: ❑ Application materials must be submitted as required below in addition to the requirements in SDC 5.1.220, Application Submittal Standards. Applications that do not include all the necessary information may be deemed incomplete in accordance with SDC 5.1.225, Acceptance of Application. Please Note: These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents • The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or in part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. • Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. ❑ General Requirements. See SDC 5.17.115(A). ❑ Be prepared by a design professional, licensed in the state of Oregon, when required by state law, such as an engineer, architect, landscape architect, land surveyor, or other qualified professional as determined by the Director; ❑ Be drawn to scale with the scale indicated on the plans, and the scale sized appropriately for the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan related to the approval standards; ❑ Include a north arrow and date of preparation and/or revision; ❑ Provide the physical address of the subject property, if applicable, and the County assessor's tax map and lot number; ❑ Provide the names and addresses of all persons listed as owners on the most recently recorded deed; ❑ Provide the name, address, email address, and telephone number of any person that assisted in preparing the application materials or plans; and ❑ Show the size of the property and development area in acres or square feet. ❑ Existing Conditions Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(8)). The application must include an existing site conditions plan that shows, for the entire property and the surrounding property to a distance of 150 feet from the subject property boundaries: ❑ The property boundaries, dimensions, and gross area; ❑ Topographic contour lines at one -foot intervals for slopes equal to or less than ten percent and at two -foot intervals for slopes greater than ten percent; ❑ The location and width of all public and private streets, drives, sidewalks, pathways, rights-of-way, and easements; ❑ Potential natural hazard areas, including areas mapped by the City, County, or State as having a potential for geologic hazards; ❑ Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; ❑ Resource areas, including wetlands on the City's Local Wetlands Inventory, streams, surface mines, and wildlife habitat identified by the City or any natural resource regulatory agencies as requiring protection; ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow, and top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map and their riparian areas; ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision; ❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3.200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department; ❑ Features, including existing structures, pavement, large rock outcroppings, drainage ways, canals and ditches; ❑ The location, size and species of trees and other vegetation having a caliper (diameter) of six inches or greater at four feet above grade; and ❑ Locally or federally designated historic and cultural resources ❑ Proposed Site Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(C)). ❑ The proposed development site, including boundaries, dimensions, and gross area; ❑ Existing site features, including trees, identified on the site analysis map, if any, which are proposed to be retained, removed, or modified by the proposed development; ❑ The location and dimensions of all existing and proposed structures, utilities, pavement, and other improvements on the site and adjacent to the site for a distance of 150 feet; ❑ Setback dimensions for all existing and proposed buildings; ❑ Loading and service areas for waste disposal, loading, and delivery; and ❑ Outdoor recreation spaces, common areas, plazas, outdoor seating, street furniture, and similar improvements ❑ Utility and Improvement Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(D)). The application must include a utility and improvement plant that shows: ❑ The name and location of all existing and proposed public and private streets within or on the boundary of the proposed development site including the right-of-way and paving dimensions, and the ownership and maintenance status; ❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, streetlights, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities; ❑ The location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails; ❑ The location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and communications connections including cable, internet, and television cable, etc.; ❑ The proposed connection points of the proposed utilities; and ❑ The location and size of existing and proposed easement and public dedications ❑ Landscape Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(E)). ❑ Existing and proposed building and pavement outlines; ❑ The location and dimensions of existing and proposed terraces, retaining walls, decks, patios, shelters, and play areas; ❑ Existing and proposed abutting street right-of-way landscaping; ❑ Screening as specified in SDC 4.4.110; ❑ Plantings, either existing or proposed, used in erosion control and stormwater treatment facilities; ❑ Details of a permanent irrigation system, unless specifically exempted as specified in SDC 4.4.100; ❑ Street trees as specified in SDC 4.2.140; ❑ A specifications list for all landscaping materials to be used; ❑ A planting schedule containing the location, size, and species of the existing and proposed plant materials (at time of planting); ❑ The anticipated size of all proposed plants at two years, or at maturity, whichever is first; and ❑ A description of planting methods as specified in SDC 4.4.100 ❑ Access, Circulation, Parking, and Lighting Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(F)). ❑ The location, dimensions and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, landscaped areas, wheel bumpers, directional signs and striping; ❑ The location and dimensions of all site circulation for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles including entrances and exits to the site, and loading and service areas; ❑ Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways and driveways proposed to be closed; ❑ On-site lighting including the location, orientation, and maximum height of all proposed exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached. ❑ For lighting, the type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and the type of illumination, the wattage, luminous area, and a photometric test report for each light source; ❑ The location, type, number, and dimensions of all bicycle parking spaces; ❑ The amount of gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use; ❑ The location of off-street loading areas; ❑ Existing and proposed transit facilities; ❑ A copy of a Right-of-way Approach Permit application, where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility; and ❑ A Traffic Impact Study prepared by an Oregon Licensed Traffic Engineer when required by and as specified in SDC 4.2.105(A)(4). ❑ Grading, Paving, and Stormwater Management Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(G)). ❑ Stormwater management system for the entire development area; ❑ The roof drainage patterns and discharge locations; ❑ The pervious and impervious area drainage patterns; ❑ The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainage ways to be retained; and ❑ The existing and proposed elevations, site grades, and contours ❑ Phased Development Plan. The application must include a Phased Development Plan if phasing is proposed. The plan must indicate any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase as specified in SDC 5.17.115. Phasing must progress in a sequence that promotes street connectivity between the various phases and accommodates other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The Approval Authority may require the applicant to enter into an agreement for phased developments, and may require bonding or other assurances for improvements, in accordance with SDC 5.15.135, Bonding and Assurances for Development. ❑ Narrative. The application must include a written letter, narrative, or report documenting how the proposal is in compliance with the applicable approval criteria contained in SDC 5.17.125, Site Plan Review Approval Standards. ❑ Deed Restrictions. The application must submit copies of all existing and proposed restrictions or covenants. ❑ Additional Information. The Director may require an applicant to submit additional information at the time of Site Plan Review application submittal. At the applicant's expense, additional studies, reports, or exhibits prepared by qualified professionals may be required to address specific site features or concerns to demonstrate compliance with approval standards. Additional information may include, but is not limited to the following items: ❑ Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved; ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Oregon -licensed engineer, if the required Site Assessment specified in SDC 5.17.120 indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. ❑ Septic Systems. If the properties are not served by the City sewer system in accordance with SDC 4.3.105, the application must include documentation from the Department of Environmental Quality or its agent that indicates that the proposed development will be in compliance with all applicable requirements for sanitary septic systems when such systems exist on the properties affected by the development. IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1.210: The following information may be submitted or may be required to be submitted for the applicant to demonstrate compliance with the applicable approval standards. ❑ Preliminary Title Report. A Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 90 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ❑ Traffic Impact Study. A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. ❑ Multiple Unit Housing Standards. Materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 4.7.380, Multiple Unit Housing Standards (if applicable). ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report. Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW. ❑ Geotechnical Report. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high-water table, or if required by the City Engineer. ❑ Overlay District. Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives. ❑ Additional Information. Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. ❑ Tree Felling Permit. If five or more qualifying trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19.100. ❑ Wetland Delineation. A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Department of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property. ❑ Federal or State Permits. The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Land and Drainage Alteration Permit (LDAPI. Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development in accordance with Springfield Municipal Code 8.418. 10 ❑ Discretionary Use or Variance. Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 must be provided. ❑ Annexation. An Annexation application must be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7.100, where a development is proposed outside of the City limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer. 11 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E I ENGINEERING wwJB Eugene En sworn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) accordanceIn with the Site Plan Review — Type 2 (SPR) submittal requirements, this written statement and the enclosed attachments describe the proposed development and demonstrate that the proposal complies with the relevant SPR criteria under Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.17-125 and the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed Use Plan District criteria of SDC 3.4-270 and SDC 3.4.275, and is consistent with the goals of the 2014 Glenwood Refinement Plan. Project Information: Rosen Sunvisor Systems (Rosen) engineers and manufactures a complete array of custom sun attenuation systems for aircraft, military, marine, and othervehicles. Rosen employs approximately 32 people and has been in operation at their current location since 1985. Rosen plans to expand their facility by adding a storage area to the northwest corner of their existing building. The proposed building expansion is approximately 2800 S.F.insize. Uses that will occur in the proposed storage area will be limited to storage of equipment and materials. A recent 12,735 S.F. facility expansion was completed in 2019 under a Type III Site Review Process (Case 811-18000208-T P2). Site Information: The subject site is located at 4884 Franklin Boulevard and consists of two adjoining tax lots (112000 and 2001) comprising approximately 1.77 acres. The property contains an existing 37,009 S.F. light manufacturing facility with parking lot and driving aisles, outdoor storage compound, truck loading docks and site landscaping. Tax lots 2000 and 2001 are zoned Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District. The site abuts Light Medium Industrial zoned propertyto the west and Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District zoned propertyto north, east, and south. Mobile home park property to the north contains residential structures but is zoned the same as the subject property, Employment Mixed Use. The site lies within Zone X5, Areas of 500 year flood, areas of 100 -year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile, and areas protected by levees from 100 -year flood, as mapped on FIRM map number 41039C1142F. Soil type on the site is 97 Newberg Urban land complex. The site is not located within a Time of Travel Zone for SUB wellhead protection. August 30, 2023 Page 1 of JOHNSON 325 West 1 S Avenue J B E IENGINEERING JB Eugene, OEnscoorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) Approval Criteria: Springfield Development Code 5.17125 Criteria (A) The Director must approve, approve with conditions, or deny a proposed Site Plan Review application based on the following standards: (1) The proposed land use is a permitted use oris allowed as a discretionary use in the land use district. The current land use is light manufacturing which is a permitted use in the zoning district Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District as codified in SDC 3.4.245 (B)(4). The current zoning district for this site is Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District. No change in use is proposed by this expansion project. (2) fau s allowed as a discretionary use, in addition to meeting the standards below,a Discretionary Use application must be approved in conformance with the standards in SDCi9.100. The use is not a discretionary use, therefore this requirement is not applicable. (3) The proposal complies with the standards of the land use district of the subject property, The subject property lies within the Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District, SDC 3.4.200. The proposal complies with the public and private development standards in SDC 3.4.270 and the building design standards in SDC 3.4-275, SDC 3.4-278 A. Public Streets, Alleys and Sidewalks'. No new streets and/or alleys are planned on-site, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Sidewalks already exist along the Nugget Way frontage in conformance with the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (SEDSPM). Sidewalks do not exist along the McVay Highway frontage, but it is anticipated that they will be included in the design of the City's roundaboutproject in this area. B. Street Trees and Curbside Planter Strips'. No new streets and/or alleys are planned on-site, therefore this requirement is not applicable. C. Lighting'. Private on- site lighting will comply with the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, and will be attached to the exterior of the new building addition. Lighting will be the minimum level required for effective illumination of the on-site parking areas, and will include shielding to contain glare and reflection within the boundaries of the property. Proposed lighting is shown on Sheet L11. D. Bicycle Facilities'. The site is not part of the multiuse path, therefore this requirement is not applicable. E. Multiuse Path'. Site is not part ofthe multiuse path, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN sUNVISOR, SITEPIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 2of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E I ENGINEERING xwJB Eugene Enscoorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) F. Private Property Landscape Standards'. Landscaping is in compliance with the general landscaping standards of L3, and includes protection of existing vegetation. G. Vehicle/Bicycle Parking and Loading Standards'. There is sufficient vehicle parking space provided on the site. Vehicle parking spaces will not be increased and are below the maximum allowed in Table 3.4.1. With the proposed 2,800 S.F. building addition the total facility building floor area will be 37,099 S. F. and require four bicycle parking spaces perTable 3.4-2. On-site bicycle parking requirements were addressed with the previous site review process. Three long- term bicycle spaces were provided inside the building. One short-term bicycle hoop was provided outside on the west side ofthe building. H. Wastewater Facilities and Services'. No public wastewater facilities or change to existing wastewater facilities are proposed, therefore this requirement is not applicable. I. Stormwater Facilities and Services'. No public stormwater facilities are available. Existing private stormwater facilities are designed as Low Impact Development (LID) perthe GRP and to Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. J. Public Park and Open Space Facilities'. No public park or open space facilities are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. K. location of Transit Stations'. Existing bus transit stations are located 600feetto the north and 190feet to the south along Franklin Boulevard. L. Signs'. No additional signage is proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. SDC 3.4-275 A. General'. The building and site are designed per Section 3.4-275 with any exception noted below. Any design exception noted provides an alternative means of meeting the intent of the code. The building is located in Subarea D of the Glenwood Refinement Plan. A restrictive covenant on the property limits the exterior construction, but allows the use of prepaintedmetal siding with a masonry wainscot extending from grade level at least 48 inches above grade. B. Design Team'. A civil engineer is part ofthe design team. C. Building Facade'. Due to the covenant restriction on the property, the previous addition project chose to use tiltupconcrete construction where articulation in the vertical and horizontal is very limited. The previous building addition met the intent of this code section by incorporating variation in the building facade by providing a different texture (aesthetic stone outline) along portions ofthe tiltupconcrete panels. The mezzanine (upper story) utilized a feature strip that mimics windows below. The new addition will be a steel building with ribbed metal panel siding ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 3 of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E IENGINEERING w Eugen ewJBEnscoorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) and a lower 48 inch split face CMU wainscot. Similarfeatures will be incorporated in the new construction to match those used in the previous addition. D. Height: The existing building height varies from 20'0"to 25'7". The new addition will have maximum building height of 23'-6". E. Massing/Building Articulation To eliminate the appearance of flat blank walls, the following elements are part ofthe design, repeating window patterns and trim. F. Windows and Doors. Per this section, Subarea D, Light Manufacturing windows and doors shall comprise a minimum of 40 percent of the length and 25 percent of the wall area of the buildings first floorfacades to allow views into lobbies and work areas and allow persons inside to look out. Rosen produces products under government contracts that require secrecy and concealment from the public. For this reason, Rosen is seeking an exception from SDC 3.4- 275.E.l.d.i. High windows will be provided along the south facing wall that meet the 40 percent length and 25 percent area of the code. G. Orientation'. There is no change to the main entrances to the existing building. An existing entrance at the rear loading dock will remain. Vehicle access doors and man doors will be provided on the south and west sides of the new addition. H. Build to Lines and Maximum Building Setback'. The existing building already meets the required building setbacks. The new building addition will not encroach in the required building setback. I. Pedestrian Amenities'. Building canopies are provided along the east portion of the building and lighting along the building wall to meet the intent ofthis code. Pedestrian amenities along the Nugget Wayfrontage were included in the previous expansion project. Those amenities included 6 benches, 6 trash receptacles, and 9 pedestrian scale wall mounted lights. Installation of those improvements was deferred until the vacant lot to the south is developed and occupied to discourage vandalism. The City has now indicated that installation of these improvements an be deferred until the City completes design and construction of the proposed roundabout at the Franklin/Nugget Way intersection. J. Screening Mechanical Equipment. New mechanical ventilation equipment will be placed on the rooftop of the addition and screened by a parapet wall so as not to be seen from adjacent public streets. K. Parking Structure Design Standards'. No parking structures are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 4 of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E IENGINEERING B Eugene Oregon97401coorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) (4) The proposal complies with any applicable approved master plan, m asterfacilities plan, refinement plan, and/orspecial planned district. The subject property lies within the McVay Riverfront area identified in the 2834 Glenwood Refinement Plan. The existing use as manufacturing is consistent with the current zoning and provisions of the adopted Refinement Plan. (5) The proposal complies with the applicable sections cf5DC42,,Infrastructure Standards - transportation. 4.2.185 Public Streets'. No new public streets and/or alleys are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.118 Private Streets'. No new private streets are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.128 Site Access and Driveway Standards'. Existing driveways are shown on the Existing Conditions Sheet CLS. No new driveways are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.125 Intersections'. No new intersections are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.135 Vision Clearance Area'. Existing vision clearance areas are shown on the Site Plan Sheet C25. and will be maintained in accordance with this code. 4.2.135 Sidewalks'. No new sidewalks are proposed with this project. Sidewalks already exist along the Nugget Way frontage in conformance with the SEDSPM. Sidewalks do not exist along the McVay Highway frontage, but it is anticipated that they will be included in the design of the City's round- about project in this area. 4.2.145 Street Trees'. No new street trees are proposed with this project. Street tree requirements along the Nugget Way frontage were addressed during the previous site review. 4.2.145 Lighting Standards'. No public street lighting is proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Private on-site lighting is addressed in SDC 4.5.155. 4.2.155 Multi Use Paths'. No multi use paths are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.165 Accessways'. No accessways are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 5 of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E IENGINEERING B Eugene Oregon97401coorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) (6) The proposal complies with the applicable sections cf5DC43,Infrastructure Standards - utilities, 4.3.185 Sanitary Sewer'. No new public sanitary sewers are proposed with this project. A private sanitary sewer will be extended to serve new floor drains in the proposed addition. The floor drains will be hydaulicly isolated to exclude Stormwater. 4.3.118 Stormwater Management'. No new stormwater management systems are proposed with this project. The area of impervious surface will remain unchanged. After reviewing the project, City of Springfield Development and Public Works representatives determined that the proposed changes did not warrant the completion of a Stormwater Scoping Sheet and therefore no Stormwater Management System Study would be required. An existing Stormwater catchbasin located within the footprint ofthe proposed addition will be removed and the paved area in the vicinity will be regraded to direct runoff to the existing storm water treatment area at the southwest corner of the existing building. Runoff from the new addition roof area will be directed to the existing pipe that runs to Nugget Way, resulting in no changes to Stormwater destination. 4.3.115 Water Quality Protection'. The subject site is not in a riparian area along a Water Quality Limited Watercourse, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.117 Natural Resource Protection Areas'. The subject site is not within a Natural Resource Protection Area, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.128 Utility Provider Coordination'. No new utility connections are proposed with this development, all existing utility extensions will be extended from the existing building to serve the w addition. An existing natural gas line at the northwest corner of the addition will require relocation by the utility provider. The developer will coordinate with the utility provider for this work. 4.3.125 Underground Placement of Utilities'. No new overhead or above ground utilities are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.127 Electrical Service'. No new electrical services are proposed with this project. There is adequate capacity in the existing electrical service to serve the new addition. 4.3.138 Water Service and Fire Protection'. Water service and fire sprinklers are currently provided to the existing building and will be extended to serve the new addition. No new fire hydrants are required to provide fire protection forthe building addition. Existing fire hydrants are shown on the Existing Conditions Sheet. No public street lighting is proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Private on-site lighting is addressed in SDC 4.5.188. 4.3.135 Major Electrical Power Transmission Lines'. No major electrical power transmission lines are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.148 Public Easements'. No new public easements are required or proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.145 Wireless Telecommunications Systems (WTS) Facilities'. No new WTSfacilities are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 6 of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E IENGINEERING B Eugene OregEnscoorn BRODERICK 541-338-94881office) (7) The proposal complies with the applicable sections cf SDC4 q, Landscaping, Screening, and Fence Standards. 4.4. 105 Landscaping'. No new landscaping is proposed with this project. Landscaping requirements in setback areas were addressed in the previous site review. All existing landscaping will be retained and protected during construction. 4.4. 110 Screening'. Vegetative screening is currently provided along the north property line where the site abuts a residential use. No additional items that require screening are proposed with this project. 4.2. 115 Fences'. The site is currently fenced around the perimeter with 6 foot high chain link fence with access gates at the driveways. No changes to existing fencing are proposed with this project. (8) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of POP 45,On-Site Lighting Standards. 4.5. 110 Lighting Standards'. New exterior wall mounted light fixtures are proposed on the south and west side of the building addition as shown on Sheet L11. The proposed on-site lighting is shielded to contain glare and reflection within the property boundaries and is the minimum illumination necessary in compliance with the Illuminating Engineering Society of North Am once. (9) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.6, Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading, and Bicycle Parking Standards. Motor vehicle parking, loading and bicycle parking Ste nitaEda are addressed in 3.4.278 (G) above and currently meet the requirements of this code. (SO) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.7, Spec fic Development Standards. Specific development standards for the Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District are found in SDC 3.4.288 and addressed in Subsection (3) above. (11) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4 8, Temporary Use Standards. (6443) No temporary uses are proposed with this development, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Conclusion: Based on the information provided and findings contained in this written statement and associated plan set, the proposed building addition for Rosen Su nvisor Systems meets the Site Plan Review criteria contained in the Springfield Development Code. Therefore, the applicant requests that the City of Springfield approve the proposal. If you have any questions about this written Statement or associated plan set, please contact Jimi Witt at (541) 338-9488 M036 or email at'. jimi@jbe.us.com. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page ] of August 30, 2023