Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMeeting Packet Planner 9/7/2023AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE OEVELOPMENTSERVICESOEPAR7MENT 125FIF711S7REET Conference Roam 616/ MS Teams SfalfReview. Tuesday, September 26,20239.00-930a,m, �. Annexation 811-23-000206-TVP2 811-23-000196-PROJ Rosen Sunvisor Systems Assessor's Map: 18-03-03-14 TL: 2000 & 2001 Address: 4884 Franklin Blvd. Existing Use: GEMU Applicant submitted proposal for addition to existing building for storage. Planner: Andy Limbird Meeting: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 9:00 — 9:30 virtual meeting via MicrosoftTeams The Complete DRC Packet for this meeting is available online for you to review or print out from the laserfiche website: httos://www.springfield-or.00v/weblink8/browse.aspx / , f , `/ � {s•., �� �, ��� � . ��� �� City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW - TYPE 2 6 SPRINGFIE D Application o Site Plan Review Completeness Check ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal ❑ Final Site Plan Submittal Required Project Information (Applicant: Applicant Name: Niles Hanson Complete this Section) Phone: 541-747-0034 Company: Rosen Sunvisor Systems Email: Niles@nwstamping.com Address: 4884 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403 Applicants Rep: Jimi Witt Phone: 541-338-9488 x1006 Company: Johnson Broderick Engineering Email: jimi@jbe.us.com Address: 325 West 13th Avenue, Eugene, OR 97401 Property Owner: Niles Hanson Phone: 541-747-0034 Company: Rosen Sunvisor Systems Email: Niles@nwstamping.com Address: 4884 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-03-3-14 TAX LOT NO (S): 2000 & 2001 Property Address (if applicable): 4884 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403 rty: Size of Property: 1.77 P � Sq.F[ Units Per Acre: N/A Proposed Project Name: New Storage Addition Proposal: See attached Existing Use: Light Medium Industrial New Impervious Area (Sq. Ft.): 0 Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: Associated Applications: Complete This Section) Placard: Case No: Date: Reviewed By: Application Fee: $ Tech Fee: $ Notice Fee: $ TOTAL FEE: $ PROJECT NO: JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E I ENGINEERING wwJB Eugene En sworn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) accordanceIn with the Site Plan Review — Type 2 (SPR) submittal requirements, this written statement and the enclosed attachments describe the proposed development and demonstrate that the proposal complies with the relevant SPR criteria under Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.17-125 and the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed Use Plan District criteria of SDC 3.4-270 and SDC 3.4.275, and is consistent with the goals of the 2014 Glenwood Refinement Plan. Project Information: Rosen Sunvisor Systems (Rosen) engineers and manufactures a complete array of custom sun attenuation systems for aircraft, military, marine, and othervehicles. Rosen employs approximately 32 people and has been in operation at their current location since 1985. Rosen plans to expand their facility by adding a storage area to the northwest corner of their existing building. The proposed building expansion is approximately 2800 S.F.insize. Uses that will occur in the proposed storage area will be limited to storage of equipment and materials. A recent 12,735 S.F. facility expansion was completed in 2019 under a Type III Site Review Process (Case 811-18000208-T P2). Site Information: The subject site is located at 4884 Franklin Boulevard and consists of two adjoining tax lots (112000 and 2001) comprising approximately 1.77 acres. The property contains an existing 37,009 S.F. light manufacturing facility with parking lot and driving aisles, outdoor storage compound, truck loading docks and site landscaping. Tax lots 2000 and 2001 are zoned Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District. The site abuts Light Medium Industrial zoned propertyto the west and Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District zoned propertyto north, east, and south. Mobile home park property to the north contains residential structures but is zoned the same as the subject property, Employment Mixed Use. The site lies within Zone X5, Areas of 500 year flood, areas of 100 -year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile, and areas protected by levees from 100 -year flood, as mapped on FIRM map number 41039C1142F. Soil type on the site is 97 Newberg Urban land complex. The site is not located within a Time of Travel Zone for SUB wellhead protection. August 30, 2023 Page 1 of JOHNSON 325 West 1 S Avenue J B E IENGINEERING JB Eugene, OEnscoorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) Approval Criteria: Springfield Development Code 5.17125 Criteria (A) The Director must approve, approve with conditions, or deny a proposed Site Plan Review application based on the following standards: (1) The proposed land use is a permitted use oris allowed as a discretionary use in the land use district. The current land use is light manufacturing which is a permitted use in the zoning district Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District as codified in SDC 3.4.245 (B)(4). The current zoning district for this site is Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District. No change in use is proposed by this expansion project. (2) fau s allowed as a discretionary use, in addition to meeting the standards below,a Discretionary Use application must be approved in conformance with the standards in SDCi9.100. The use is not a discretionary use, therefore this requirement is not applicable. (3) The proposal complies with the standards of the land use district of the subject property, The subject property lies within the Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District, SDC 3.4.200. The proposal complies with the public and private development standards in SDC 3.4.270 and the building design standards in SDC 3.4-275, SDC 3.4-278 A. Public Streets, Alleys and Sidewalks'. No new streets and/or alleys are planned on-site, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Sidewalks already exist along the Nugget Way frontage in conformance with the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (SEDSPM). Sidewalks do not exist along the McVay Highway frontage, but it is anticipated that they will be included in the design of the City's roundaboutproject in this area. B. Street Trees and Curbside Planter Strips'. No new streets and/or alleys are planned on-site, therefore this requirement is not applicable. C. Lighting'. Private on- site lighting will comply with the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, and will be attached to the exterior of the new building addition. Lighting will be the minimum level required for effective illumination of the on-site parking areas, and will include shielding to contain glare and reflection within the boundaries of the property. Proposed lighting is shown on Sheet L11. D. Bicycle Facilities'. The site is not part of the multiuse path, therefore this requirement is not applicable. E. Multiuse Path'. Site is not part ofthe multiuse path, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN sUNVISOR, SITEPIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 2of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E I ENGINEERING xwJB Eugene Enscoorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) F. Private Property Landscape Standards'. Landscaping is in compliance with the general landscaping standards of L3, and includes protection of existing vegetation. G. Vehicle/Bicycle Parking and Loading Standards'. There is sufficient vehicle parking space provided on the site. Vehicle parking spaces will not be increased and are below the maximum allowed in Table 3.4.1. With the proposed 2,800 S.F. building addition the total facility building floor area will be 37,099 S. F. and require four bicycle parking spaces perTable 3.4-2. On-site bicycle parking requirements were addressed with the previous site review process. Three long- term bicycle spaces were provided inside the building. One short-term bicycle hoop was provided outside on the west side ofthe building. H. Wastewater Facilities and Services'. No public wastewater facilities or change to existing wastewater facilities are proposed, therefore this requirement is not applicable. I. Stormwater Facilities and Services'. No public stormwater facilities are available. Existing private stormwater facilities are designed as Low Impact Development (LID) perthe GRP and to Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. J. Public Park and Open Space Facilities'. No public park or open space facilities are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. K. location of Transit Stations'. Existing bus transit stations are located 600feetto the north and 190feet to the south along Franklin Boulevard. L. Signs'. No additional signage is proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. SDC 3.4-275 A. General'. The building and site are designed per Section 3.4-275 with any exception noted below. Any design exception noted provides an alternative means of meeting the intent of the code. The building is located in Subarea D of the Glenwood Refinement Plan. A restrictive covenant on the property limits the exterior construction, but allows the use of prepaintedmetal siding with a masonry wainscot extending from grade level at least 48 inches above grade. B. Design Team'. A civil engineer is part ofthe design team. C. Building Facade'. Due to the covenant restriction on the property, the previous addition project chose to use tiltupconcrete construction where articulation in the vertical and horizontal is very limited. The previous building addition met the intent of this code section by incorporating variation in the building facade by providing a different texture (aesthetic stone outline) along portions ofthe tiltupconcrete panels. The mezzanine (upper story) utilized a feature strip that mimics windows below. The new addition will be a steel building with ribbed metal panel siding ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 3 of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E IENGINEERING w Eugen ewJBEnscoorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) and a lower 48 inch split face CMU wainscot. Similarfeatures will be incorporated in the new construction to match those used in the previous addition. D. Height: The existing building height varies from 20'0"to 25'7". The new addition will have maximum building height of 23'-6". E. Massing/Building Articulation To eliminate the appearance of flat blank walls, the following elements are part ofthe design, repeating window patterns and trim. F. Windows and Doors. Per this section, Subarea D, Light Manufacturing windows and doors shall comprise a minimum of 40 percent of the length and 25 percent of the wall area of the buildings first floorfacades to allow views into lobbies and work areas and allow persons inside to look out. Rosen produces products under government contracts that require secrecy and concealment from the public. For this reason, Rosen is seeking an exception from SDC 3.4- 275.E.l.d.i. High windows will be provided along the south facing wall that meet the 40 percent length and 25 percent area of the code. G. Orientation'. There is no change to the main entrances to the existing building. An existing entrance at the rear loading dock will remain. Vehicle access doors and man doors will be provided on the south and west sides of the new addition. H. Build to Lines and Maximum Building Setback'. The existing building already meets the required building setbacks. The new building addition will not encroach in the required building setback. I. Pedestrian Amenities'. Building canopies are provided along the east portion of the building and lighting along the building wall to meet the intent ofthis code. Pedestrian amenities along the Nugget Wayfrontage were included in the previous expansion project. Those amenities included 6 benches, 6 trash receptacles, and 9 pedestrian scale wall mounted lights. Installation of those improvements was deferred until the vacant lot to the south is developed and occupied to discourage vandalism. The City has now indicated that installation of these improvements an be deferred until the City completes design and construction of the proposed roundabout at the Franklin/Nugget Way intersection. J. Screening Mechanical Equipment. New mechanical ventilation equipment will be placed on the rooftop of the addition and screened by a parapet wall so as not to be seen from adjacent public streets. K. Parking Structure Design Standards'. No parking structures are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 4 of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E IENGINEERING B Eugene Oregon97401coorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) (4) The proposal complies with any applicable approved master plan, m asterfacilities plan, refinement plan, and/orspecial planned district. The subject property lies within the McVay Riverfront area identified in the 2834 Glenwood Refinement Plan. The existing use as manufacturing is consistent with the current zoning and provisions of the adopted Refinement Plan. (5) The proposal complies with the applicable sections cf5DC42,,Infrastructure Standards - transportation. 4.2.185 Public Streets'. No new public streets and/or alleys are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.118 Private Streets'. No new private streets are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.128 Site Access and Driveway Standards'. Existing driveways are shown on the Existing Conditions Sheet CLS. No new driveways are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.125 Intersections'. No new intersections are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.135 Vision Clearance Area'. Existing vision clearance areas are shown on the Site Plan Sheet C25. and will be maintained in accordance with this code. 4.2.135 Sidewalks'. No new sidewalks are proposed with this project. Sidewalks already exist along the Nugget Way frontage in conformance with the SEDSPM. Sidewalks do not exist along the McVay Highway frontage, but it is anticipated that they will be included in the design of the City's round- about project in this area. 4.2.145 Street Trees'. No new street trees are proposed with this project. Street tree requirements along the Nugget Way frontage were addressed during the previous site review. 4.2.145 Lighting Standards'. No public street lighting is proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Private on-site lighting is addressed in SDC 4.5.155. 4.2.155 Multi Use Paths'. No multi use paths are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.165 Accessways'. No accessways are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 5 of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E IENGINEERING B Eugene Oregon97401coorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) (6) The proposal complies with the applicable sections cf5DC43,Infrastructure Standards - utilities, 4.3.185 Sanitary Sewer'. No new public sanitary sewers are proposed with this project. A private sanitary sewer will be extended to serve new floor drains in the proposed addition. The floor drains will be hydaulicly isolated to exclude Stormwater. 4.3.118 Stormwater Management'. No new stormwater management systems are proposed with this project. The area of impervious surface will remain unchanged. After reviewing the project, City of Springfield Development and Public Works representatives determined that the proposed changes did not warrant the completion of a Stormwater Scoping Sheet and therefore no Stormwater Management System Study would be required. An existing Stormwater catchbasin located within the footprint ofthe proposed addition will be removed and the paved area in the vicinity will be regraded to direct runoff to the existing storm water treatment area at the southwest corner of the existing building. Runoff from the new addition roof area will be directed to the existing pipe that runs to Nugget Way, resulting in no changes to Stormwater destination. 4.3.115 Water Quality Protection'. The subject site is not in a riparian area along a Water Quality Limited Watercourse, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.117 Natural Resource Protection Areas'. The subject site is not within a Natural Resource Protection Area, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.128 Utility Provider Coordination'. No new utility connections are proposed with this development, all existing utility extensions will be extended from the existing building to serve the w addition. An existing natural gas line at the northwest corner of the addition will require relocation by the utility provider. The developer will coordinate with the utility provider for this work. 4.3.125 Underground Placement of Utilities'. No new overhead or above ground utilities are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.127 Electrical Service'. No new electrical services are proposed with this project. There is adequate capacity in the existing electrical service to serve the new addition. 4.3.138 Water Service and Fire Protection'. Water service and fire sprinklers are currently provided to the existing building and will be extended to serve the new addition. No new fire hydrants are required to provide fire protection forthe building addition. Existing fire hydrants are shown on the Existing Conditions Sheet. No public street lighting is proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Private on-site lighting is addressed in SDC 4.5.188. 4.3.135 Major Electrical Power Transmission Lines'. No major electrical power transmission lines are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.148 Public Easements'. No new public easements are required or proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.145 Wireless Telecommunications Systems (WTS) Facilities'. No new WTSfacilities are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 6 of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E IENGINEERING B Eugene OregEnscoorn BRODERICK 541-338-94881office) (7) The proposal complies with the applicable sections cf SDC4 q, Landscaping, Screening, and Fence Standards. 4.4. 105 Landscaping'. No new landscaping is proposed with this project. Landscaping requirements in setback areas were addressed in the previous site review. All existing landscaping will be retained and protected during construction. 4.4. 110 Screening'. Vegetative screening is currently provided along the north property line where the site abuts a residential use. No additional items that require screening are proposed with this project. 4.2. 115 Fences'. The site is currently fenced around the perimeter with 6 foot high chain link fence with access gates at the driveways. No changes to existing fencing are proposed with this project. (8) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of POP 45,On-Site Lighting Standards. 4.5. 110 Lighting Standards'. New exterior wall mounted light fixtures are proposed on the south and west side of the building addition as shown on Sheet L11. The proposed on-site lighting is shielded to contain glare and reflection within the property boundaries and is the minimum illumination necessary in compliance with the Illuminating Engineering Society of North Am once. (9) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.6, Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading, and Bicycle Parking Standards. Motor vehicle parking, loading and bicycle parking Ste nitaEda are addressed in 3.4.278 (G) above and currently meet the requirements of this code. (SO) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.7, Spec fic Development Standards. Specific development standards for the Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District are found in SDC 3.4.288 and addressed in Subsection (3) above. (11) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4 8, Temporary Use Standards. (6443) No temporary uses are proposed with this development, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Conclusion: Based on the information provided and findings contained in this written statement and associated plan set, the proposed building addition for Rosen Su nvisor Systems meets the Site Plan Review criteria contained in the Springfield Development Code. Therefore, the applicant requests that the City of Springfield approve the proposal. If you have any questions about this written Statement or associated plan set, please contact Jimi Witt at (541) 338-9488 M036 or email at'. jimi@jbe.us.com. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page ] of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E I ENGINEERING wwJB Eugene En sworn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) accordanceIn with the Site Plan Review — Type 2 (SPR) submittal requirements, this written statement and the enclosed attachments describe the proposed development and demonstrate that the proposal complies with the relevant SPR criteria under Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.17-125 and the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed Use Plan District criteria of SDC 3.4-270 and SDC 3.4.275, and is consistent with the goals of the 2014 Glenwood Refinement Plan. Project Information: Rosen Sunvisor Systems (Rosen) engineers and manufactures a complete array of custom sun attenuation systems for aircraft, military, marine, and othervehicles. Rosen employs approximately 32 people and has been in operation at their current location since 1985. Rosen plans to expand their facility by adding a storage area to the northwest corner of their existing building. The proposed building expansion is approximately 2800 S.F.insize. Uses that will occur in the proposed storage area will be limited to storage of equipment and materials. A recent 12,735 S.F. facility expansion was completed in 2019 under a Type III Site Review Process (Case 811-18000208-T P2). Site Information: The subject site is located at 4884 Franklin Boulevard and consists of two adjoining tax lots (112000 and 2001) comprising approximately 1.77 acres. The property contains an existing 37,009 S.F. light manufacturing facility with parking lot and driving aisles, outdoor storage compound, truck loading docks and site landscaping. Tax lots 2000 and 2001 are zoned Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District. The site abuts Light Medium Industrial zoned propertyto the west and Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District zoned propertyto north, east, and south. Mobile home park property to the north contains residential structures but is zoned the same as the subject property, Employment Mixed Use. The site lies within Zone X5, Areas of 500 year flood, areas of 100 -year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile, and areas protected by levees from 100 -year flood, as mapped on FIRM map number 41039C1142F. Soil type on the site is 97 Newberg Urban land complex. The site is not located within a Time of Travel Zone for SUB wellhead protection. August 30, 2023 Page 1 of JOHNSON 325 West 1 S Avenue J B E IENGINEERING JB Eugene, OEnscoorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) Approval Criteria: Springfield Development Code 5.17125 Criteria (A) The Director must approve, approve with conditions, or deny a proposed Site Plan Review application based on the following standards: (1) The proposed land use is a permitted use oris allowed as a discretionary use in the land use district. The current land use is light manufacturing which is a permitted use in the zoning district Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District as codified in SDC 3.4.245 (B)(4). The current zoning district for this site is Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District. No change in use is proposed by this expansion project. (2) fau s allowed as a discretionary use, in addition to meeting the standards below,a Discretionary Use application must be approved in conformance with the standards in SDCi9.100. The use is not a discretionary use, therefore this requirement is not applicable. (3) The proposal complies with the standards of the land use district of the subject property, The subject property lies within the Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District, SDC 3.4.200. The proposal complies with the public and private development standards in SDC 3.4.270 and the building design standards in SDC 3.4-275, SDC 3.4-278 A. Public Streets, Alleys and Sidewalks'. No new streets and/or alleys are planned on-site, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Sidewalks already exist along the Nugget Way frontage in conformance with the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (SEDSPM). Sidewalks do not exist along the McVay Highway frontage, but it is anticipated that they will be included in the design of the City's roundaboutproject in this area. B. Street Trees and Curbside Planter Strips'. No new streets and/or alleys are planned on-site, therefore this requirement is not applicable. C. Lighting'. Private on- site lighting will comply with the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, and will be attached to the exterior of the new building addition. Lighting will be the minimum level required for effective illumination of the on-site parking areas, and will include shielding to contain glare and reflection within the boundaries of the property. Proposed lighting is shown on Sheet L11. D. Bicycle Facilities'. The site is not part of the multiuse path, therefore this requirement is not applicable. E. Multiuse Path'. Site is not part ofthe multiuse path, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN sUNVISOR, SITEPIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 2of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E I ENGINEERING xwJB Eugene Enscoorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) F. Private Property Landscape Standards'. Landscaping is in compliance with the general landscaping standards of L3, and includes protection of existing vegetation. G. Vehicle/Bicycle Parking and Loading Standards'. There is sufficient vehicle parking space provided on the site. Vehicle parking spaces will not be increased and are below the maximum allowed in Table 3.4.1. With the proposed 2,800 S.F. building addition the total facility building floor area will be 37,099 S. F. and require four bicycle parking spaces perTable 3.4-2. On-site bicycle parking requirements were addressed with the previous site review process. Three long- term bicycle spaces were provided inside the building. One short-term bicycle hoop was provided outside on the west side ofthe building. H. Wastewater Facilities and Services'. No public wastewater facilities or change to existing wastewater facilities are proposed, therefore this requirement is not applicable. I. Stormwater Facilities and Services'. No public stormwater facilities are available. Existing private stormwater facilities are designed as Low Impact Development (LID) perthe GRP and to Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. J. Public Park and Open Space Facilities'. No public park or open space facilities are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. K. location of Transit Stations'. Existing bus transit stations are located 600feetto the north and 190feet to the south along Franklin Boulevard. L. Signs'. No additional signage is proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. SDC 3.4-275 A. General'. The building and site are designed per Section 3.4-275 with any exception noted below. Any design exception noted provides an alternative means of meeting the intent of the code. The building is located in Subarea D of the Glenwood Refinement Plan. A restrictive covenant on the property limits the exterior construction, but allows the use of prepaintedmetal siding with a masonry wainscot extending from grade level at least 48 inches above grade. B. Design Team'. A civil engineer is part ofthe design team. C. Building Facade'. Due to the covenant restriction on the property, the previous addition project chose to use tiltupconcrete construction where articulation in the vertical and horizontal is very limited. The previous building addition met the intent of this code section by incorporating variation in the building facade by providing a different texture (aesthetic stone outline) along portions ofthe tiltupconcrete panels. The mezzanine (upper story) utilized a feature strip that mimics windows below. The new addition will be a steel building with ribbed metal panel siding ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 3 of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E IENGINEERING w Eugen ewJBEnscoorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) and a lower 48 inch split face CMU wainscot. Similarfeatures will be incorporated in the new construction to match those used in the previous addition. D. Height: The existing building height varies from 20'0"to 25'7". The new addition will have maximum building height of 23'-6". E. Massing/Building Articulation To eliminate the appearance of flat blank walls, the following elements are part ofthe design, repeating window patterns and trim. F. Windows and Doors. Per this section, Subarea D, Light Manufacturing windows and doors shall comprise a minimum of 40 percent of the length and 25 percent of the wall area of the buildings first floorfacades to allow views into lobbies and work areas and allow persons inside to look out. Rosen produces products under government contracts that require secrecy and concealment from the public. For this reason, Rosen is seeking an exception from SDC 3.4- 275.E.l.d.i. High windows will be provided along the south facing wall that meet the 40 percent length and 25 percent area of the code. G. Orientation'. There is no change to the main entrances to the existing building. An existing entrance at the rear loading dock will remain. Vehicle access doors and man doors will be provided on the south and west sides of the new addition. H. Build to Lines and Maximum Building Setback'. The existing building already meets the required building setbacks. The new building addition will not encroach in the required building setback. I. Pedestrian Amenities'. Building canopies are provided along the east portion of the building and lighting along the building wall to meet the intent ofthis code. Pedestrian amenities along the Nugget Wayfrontage were included in the previous expansion project. Those amenities included 6 benches, 6 trash receptacles, and 9 pedestrian scale wall mounted lights. Installation of those improvements was deferred until the vacant lot to the south is developed and occupied to discourage vandalism. The City has now indicated that installation of these improvements an be deferred until the City completes design and construction of the proposed roundabout at the Franklin/Nugget Way intersection. J. Screening Mechanical Equipment. New mechanical ventilation equipment will be placed on the rooftop of the addition and screened by a parapet wall so as not to be seen from adjacent public streets. K. Parking Structure Design Standards'. No parking structures are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 4 of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E IENGINEERING B Eugene Oregon97401coorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) (4) The proposal complies with any applicable approved master plan, m asterfacilities plan, refinement plan, and/orspecial planned district. The subject property lies within the McVay Riverfront area identified in the 2834 Glenwood Refinement Plan. The existing use as manufacturing is consistent with the current zoning and provisions of the adopted Refinement Plan. (5) The proposal complies with the applicable sections cf5DC42,,Infrastructure Standards - transportation. 4.2.185 Public Streets'. No new public streets and/or alleys are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.118 Private Streets'. No new private streets are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.128 Site Access and Driveway Standards'. Existing driveways are shown on the Existing Conditions Sheet CLS. No new driveways are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.125 Intersections'. No new intersections are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.135 Vision Clearance Area'. Existing vision clearance areas are shown on the Site Plan Sheet C25. and will be maintained in accordance with this code. 4.2.135 Sidewalks'. No new sidewalks are proposed with this project. Sidewalks already exist along the Nugget Way frontage in conformance with the SEDSPM. Sidewalks do not exist along the McVay Highway frontage, but it is anticipated that they will be included in the design of the City's round- about project in this area. 4.2.145 Street Trees'. No new street trees are proposed with this project. Street tree requirements along the Nugget Way frontage were addressed during the previous site review. 4.2.145 Lighting Standards'. No public street lighting is proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Private on-site lighting is addressed in SDC 4.5.155. 4.2.155 Multi Use Paths'. No multi use paths are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.165 Accessways'. No accessways are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 5 of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E IENGINEERING B Eugene Oregon97401coorn BRODERICK 541-338-9488 (office) (6) The proposal complies with the applicable sections cf5DC43,Infrastructure Standards - utilities, 4.3.185 Sanitary Sewer'. No new public sanitary sewers are proposed with this project. A private sanitary sewer will be extended to serve new floor drains in the proposed addition. The floor drains will be hydaulicly isolated to exclude Stormwater. 4.3.118 Stormwater Management'. No new stormwater management systems are proposed with this project. The area of impervious surface will remain unchanged. After reviewing the project, City of Springfield Development and Public Works representatives determined that the proposed changes did not warrant the completion of a Stormwater Scoping Sheet and therefore no Stormwater Management System Study would be required. An existing Stormwater catchbasin located within the footprint ofthe proposed addition will be removed and the paved area in the vicinity will be regraded to direct runoff to the existing storm water treatment area at the southwest corner of the existing building. Runoff from the new addition roof area will be directed to the existing pipe that runs to Nugget Way, resulting in no changes to Stormwater destination. 4.3.115 Water Quality Protection'. The subject site is not in a riparian area along a Water Quality Limited Watercourse, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.117 Natural Resource Protection Areas'. The subject site is not within a Natural Resource Protection Area, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.128 Utility Provider Coordination'. No new utility connections are proposed with this development, all existing utility extensions will be extended from the existing building to serve the w addition. An existing natural gas line at the northwest corner of the addition will require relocation by the utility provider. The developer will coordinate with the utility provider for this work. 4.3.125 Underground Placement of Utilities'. No new overhead or above ground utilities are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.127 Electrical Service'. No new electrical services are proposed with this project. There is adequate capacity in the existing electrical service to serve the new addition. 4.3.138 Water Service and Fire Protection'. Water service and fire sprinklers are currently provided to the existing building and will be extended to serve the new addition. No new fire hydrants are required to provide fire protection forthe building addition. Existing fire hydrants are shown on the Existing Conditions Sheet. No public street lighting is proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Private on-site lighting is addressed in SDC 4.5.188. 4.3.135 Major Electrical Power Transmission Lines'. No major electrical power transmission lines are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.148 Public Easements'. No new public easements are required or proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.145 Wireless Telecommunications Systems (WTS) Facilities'. No new WTSfacilities are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 6 of August 30, 2023 JOHNSON 325 West 13`"Avenue J B E IENGINEERING B Eugene OregEnscoorn BRODERICK 541-338-94881office) (7) The proposal complies with the applicable sections cf SDC4 q, Landscaping, Screening, and Fence Standards. 4.4. 105 Landscaping'. No new landscaping is proposed with this project. Landscaping requirements in setback areas were addressed in the previous site review. All existing landscaping will be retained and protected during construction. 4.4. 110 Screening'. Vegetative screening is currently provided along the north property line where the site abuts a residential use. No additional items that require screening are proposed with this project. 4.2. 115 Fences'. The site is currently fenced around the perimeter with 6 foot high chain link fence with access gates at the driveways. No changes to existing fencing are proposed with this project. (8) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of POP 45,On-Site Lighting Standards. 4.5. 110 Lighting Standards'. New exterior wall mounted light fixtures are proposed on the south and west side of the building addition as shown on Sheet L11. The proposed on-site lighting is shielded to contain glare and reflection within the property boundaries and is the minimum illumination necessary in compliance with the Illuminating Engineering Society of North Am once. (9) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.6, Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading, and Bicycle Parking Standards. Motor vehicle parking, loading and bicycle parking Ste nitaEda are addressed in 3.4.278 (G) above and currently meet the requirements of this code. (SO) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.7, Spec fic Development Standards. Specific development standards for the Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed Use Plan District are found in SDC 3.4.288 and addressed in Subsection (3) above. (11) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4 8, Temporary Use Standards. (6443) No temporary uses are proposed with this development, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Conclusion: Based on the information provided and findings contained in this written statement and associated plan set, the proposed building addition for Rosen Su nvisor Systems meets the Site Plan Review criteria contained in the Springfield Development Code. Therefore, the applicant requests that the City of Springfield approve the proposal. If you have any questions about this written Statement or associated plan set, please contact Jimi Witt at (541) 338-9488 M036 or email at'. jimi@jbe.us.com. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page ] of August 30, 2023