HomeMy WebLinkAboutMeeting Packet Planner 8/30/2023AGENDA
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
225 FIFTH STREET
Conference Room 616/ MS Teams
StaffReview.' Tuesday, September 19,2023 A'00-9;30 a.m.
1. Annexation 811-23-000197-TYP4 811-23-000066-PROJ Springfield Utility Board
Assessor's Map: 17-02-27-00 TL: 2002
Address: 954 65`h Street
Existing Use: Vacant
Applicant submitted proposal to annex 4.41 acre parcel
Planner: Andy Limbird
Meeting: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 9:00 — 9:30 virtual meeting via Microsoft Teams
The Complete DRC Packet for this meeting is available online for you to review or print out
from the laserfiche website: htti)://www.si)ringfield-or.gov/weblink8/browse.asi)x
SI 1 t
VICINITY MAP
811-23-000197-TYP4 Annexation
17-02-27-00 TL 2002
954 66" Street
Springfield Utility Board
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
IESPRINGFIE
Annexation Application Type 4
Application Type (Applicant., Check one)
Annexation Application Completeness Check:
Annexation A lication Submittal: I ❑
Required Proposal Information (Applicant., Complete This Section)
Property Springfield Utility Board (SUB) Phone: 541-726-2396
Owner -
Address: 1202 S. 18th Street, Springfield OR 97477 E-mail:
Owner Signature:p
Owner Signature:
X g 17 a3
Agent Name:
Rick Satre, AICP, ASLA, CSI
Phone:
541-666-4540
Company:
THE Satre Group
Fax:
Address:
375 West 4th Ave., Ste. 201, Eugene, OR 97401
E-mail
@satregrpup. "m
Agent
Signature:
If the applicant is other than the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act In his or her behalf, except
where signatures of the owner of record are required, only the owner may sign the petition.
ASSESSOR'S MAP
NO:
17-02-27-00
TAX LOT NOS
02002
Property Address:
No Address - north end of 65th Street
Area of Request:
Acres: 4.41
Square Feet:
Existing Use: Vacant
Proposed Use: proposed future Water Treatment plant - Rezone to PLO
Required Property Information (City Intake Staff., Complete This Section)
Reviewed
Case No.: Date: By:
initials
Project No.:
Placard:
Application
Fee:
postage Fee:
Total Fee:
Revised 04/17/2023 slm - Page 8 of 16
August 25, 2023
SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD
MCKENZIE RIVER SOURCE DEVELOPMENT
Annexation — Final Submittal
Map 17-02-27-00, Lot 2002
Written Statement
In accordance with SDC 5.7-125, Annexation Initiation and Application Submittal, the applicant,
Springfield Utility Board (SUB), is requesting that the City of Springfield reviewthis annexation request
and determine that the proposal complies with criteria contained in SDC 5.7-140 and that the requested
annexation can be approved. To aid Springfield staff in this endeavor, the following information is
provided.
THE SITE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
A. Planning Context
The subject property is inside the Urban
Grown Boundary (UGB) and outside the
City Limits of Springfield. The site is
contiguous to the area inside City of
""'�
Springfield city limits on its south and west
I
boundaries. The Metro Plan designation,
neighborhood plan designation and zoning
for the subject property is as follows:
1
Metro Plan: Low Density Residential
_
-
Refinement None
'�
E
Plan:
E
Base Zone: Low Density Residential
�
Overlay Urbanizable Fringe
E
Zone:
fi
E ` 1 MFOH INS
; v
Subject property
Property
E
ST
r E E
t H m ATLxL
B. Subject Site
The existing property is comprised of
one tax lot (Map 17-02-27-00, Lot
02002). Tax Lot 2002 is accessed from
651n Street, which terminates at the
property's southern boundary.
Thurston Middle School is to the west,
single-family development is to the
south and rural residential
development is to the east. The site is
vacant and is approximately 4.41 acres
in size.
Excerpt
Springfield Zoning Map
April 2023
PLANNERS + LAND SCAPE ARCHITECTS +
375 West 4th, SuHe 201, Eugene, OR 97401
Phone: 541.696.15/0
www.sa.regi oup.com
Springfield Utility Board - McKenzie Water Source Development Page 2 of 4
Annexation - Written Statement
August 25, 2023
C. Development Objective
The development objective for Springfield Utility Board (SUB) is to develop the lot with an
expansion of awater treatment facility associated with the Thurston Wellfield. With the
wellfield's location just beyond the City of Springfield's Urban Growth Boundary, and this tax lot
straddling the UGB, an annexation is the starting objective. Other land use applications for
Springfield could include a Zoning Map Amendment and Site Plan Review.
II. ANNEXATION -APPROVAL CRITERIA
Annexation Approval Criteria are found in Section 5.7-140 of the Springfield Development Code
(SDC). Applicable sections of the Code are in bold italics followed by proposed findings of facts in
normal text.
SDC 5.7-140. An annexation application may be approved only if the City Council finds that
the proposal conforms to the following criteria:
A. The affected territory proposed to be annexed is within the City's urban growth
boundary,, and is contiguous to the city limits; or separated from the City only by a
public right-of-way or a stream, lake, or other body of water.
Response: The affected territory is located within the city's urban growth boundary and is
contiguous to the city limits on its southern, eastern, and western boundaries.
Given this, criterion 5.7-140(A) is met.
B. The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable polices in the Metro Plan and in
any applicable refinement plan or Plan Districts;
Response: The subject property is
designated Low Density Residential on the
Eugene/Springfield Metro Plan diagram.
There are no applicable refinement plans or
Plan Districts. Once annexed into the City of
Springfield, the Urbanizable Fringe (UF -10)
overlay will no longer apply, and the site will
be zoned Low Density Residential. The
applicant, SUB, may apply for a subsequent
Zone Change to change the property to
Public Lands Open Space (PLO). This
designation on the property allows
government facilities and will allow SUB to
construct a water treatment plant.
METRO PLAN: Applicable policies of the Metro Plan are listed below:
Growth Management Goals. Findings and Policies:
• Policy Be. Land within the UGB maybe converted from urbanizable to urban only through
annexation to a city when d is found that: A minimum of key urban facilities and services
can be provided to the area in an orderly and efficierd manner.
The Satre Group . 375 W 4• Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 .(541) 6864540.w.va.ememoun.aom
Springfield Utility Board — McKenzie Water Source Development Page 3 of 4
Annexation — Written Statement
Response: Minimum key urban facilities and services as defined in the Metro Plan
includes wastewater, stormwater, transportation, solid waste management, water service,
fire and emergency medical service, police protection, city-wide parks and recreation
programs, electric service, land use controls, communication facilities, and public schools
on a district -wide basis (Metro Plan, Chapter V, Glossary, definition 24). As documented
elsewhere in this application these key urban facilities and services have been provided
to the subject site in an orderly and efficient manner.
• Policy 10. Annexation to a city through normal processes shall continue to be the highest
Priority.
Response: Annexation into the corporate limits of the City of Springfield is codified in the
Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.7.100- 5.7.165. Processes and procedures
regarding application, annexation, approval criteria, effective date and notice, and
withdrawal from special districts are, by submittal and processing of this Annexation
Application, being followed.
• Policy 16. Ultimately, land within the UGB shall be annexed to a city and provided with
the required minimum level of urban facilities and services.
Response: The subject site is inside the Springfield's Urban Growth Boundary. By this
Annexation Application herein, the land within the UGB (the subject site) is being
annexed and as required by applicable approval criteria, will be provided with the
minimum level of urban facilities and services.
• Policy 18. As annexations to cities occur over time, existing special service districts within
the UGB shall dissolve. The cities should consider developing intergovernmental
agreements, which address transition issues raised by annexation, with the affected
special service districts.
Response: A special district providing services to the subject property is the VWllamalane
Park and Recreation District. Wllamalane is not contemplated to dissolve. VWllamalane
and the City of Springfield have an intergovernmental agreement regarding property
annexation into the City, therefore, when a property is annexed, annexation into the
Wllamalane Park and Recreation District also occurs.
• Policy 21a When unincorporated territory within the UGB is provided with any new urban
service, that service shall be provided by the followirg method. Annexation to a city.
Response: Existing facilities and services are currently provided to the development site.
Therefore, this Metro Plan policy has already been satisfied.
Given the above, criterion 5.7-140(B) is met.
C. The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key
urban facilities and services as defined in the Metro Plan can be provided in an orderly
efficient and timely manner; and
Response: The annexation site can be provided with key urban facilities and services as
defined in the Metro Plan. Facilities and services applicable to the site, including information
regarding providers, existing facilities, and service extensions, is provided below:
Storm: The nearest public stormwater infrastructure is a storm line running north
along the west boundary of the property on the middle school property
The Salre Group . 375 W 4• Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 .(541) 686-4540.w.vu.salremoue.com
Springfield Utility Board — McKenzie Water Source Development Page 4 of 4
Annexation — Written Statement
Auoust 25. 2023
ending in a 24 -inch outfall at Cedar Creek. The existing public and private
systems will continue to be utilized.
Sanitary: Sanitary infrastructure is adjacent to the site in 65^ Street, on the southern
property line. Should sanitary infrastructure be needed for the subject
property in the future, service would be extended from 65u Street.
Water: Similar to the sanitary service, the water lines are in 65u Street on the
southern edge of the property. Water will be provided by Springfield Utility
Board (SUB).
Electric: Electric infrastructure is adjacent to the subject property along its southern
and eastern boundary. Electricity will be provided by Springfield Utility Board
(SUB).
Streets: 65^ and 66th Streets are local streets. 65^ Street dead ends on the southern
property line and could be an entrance. The applicant has current plans to
access the property from 66' Street across the northern piece of property
owned by SUB.
Given this, criterion 5.7-140(C) is met.
D. Where applicable, fiscal irrpacts to the City have been o tigated through ao Annexation
Agreement or other mechanism approved by the City Council.
Response: Annexation of the subject property into the City of Springfield is not anticipated to
have any fiscal impacts. Therefore, an Annexation Agreement is not required for annexation of
the subject property.
Given this, this criterion 5.7-140(D) is met.
III. Conclusion
Based on the information contained in this written statement and elsewhere in the application
submittal, the applicant believes that the requested annexation can be approved.
If you have any questions about the above application, please do not hesitate to contact Rick Satre,
at The Satre Group, 541-686-4540 or rick(dlsatregroup.com.
Sincerely,
R." Sa e/
Rick Satre, AICP, ASLA, CSI, Principal/Partner
The Satre Group
The Satre Group . 375 W 4^ Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 .(541) 68 4540.w.va.satreumuo.com
August 25, 2023
SUB Annexation
Map 17-02-27-00, Tax Lot 2002
Completeness Review — Responses
Completeness Review Checklist from the City- Case Number— 811 -23 -000134 -PRE
Planning Comments:
1. The Lane County Assessor has provided a 2022 assessment value of $21Z635 forthe property
which needs to be added to the owner's worksheet.
Response: The valuation has been added to the owner's worksheet (see Form 2).
2. The property is within the service territory of McKenzie Fire 8 Rescue, which needs to be added
to the supplemental information form.
Response: McKenzie Fire & Rescue has been added to the supplemental information form.
3. Please provide a full-size Assessors Tax Map showing the redline annexation area with the
application submittal. Standard size is around "18 x 24".
Response: A full size Tax Map has been printed and electronically submitted. (See attachment
12)
4. An Annexation Agreement will be required for the proposed annexation. Staff will prepare the
agreement for re view and execution by the applicant and the City.
Response: A draft copy of the Annexation Agreement has been included. The City and SUB are
still negotiating the final Agreement. Once signed by both parties an official copy will be
submitted.
Engineering/Public Works Comments:
1. Secondary emergency access from 62Ato 66A is required and an access easement from 66A and
66A to the school will be required. This could be the same easement/access.
Response: SUB is aware of this requirement and is designing the project to address these issues.
The Annexation Agreement will state this requirements and will be a part of the preliminary plans.
The pedestrian access and emergency access will have easements in place once the design is
complete.
2. If the sanitary sewer is going to be used for process water, a much larger connection with a
detailed capacity analysis will be required.
Response: SUB is aware of this requirement and is designing the project to address these issues.
A Capacity study has been completed and the City will review.
3. The stormwater can probably be handled on site with an overflow to the existing line in the school
district property.
Response: SUB is aware of this requirement and is designing the project to address these
issues.
+ uxos�ue u�exire�n +
PLANNERS + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS + ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS
375 Weffi4th, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401
Phare: 541.68aAMO
wwwsa tregroup.cam
McKenzie Water Annexation
Completeness Meeting Notes
Map 17-02-27-00, Tax Lot 2002
Page 2 of 2
4. An Annexation Agreement will be required that lays out the development requirements for future
Connection to be done during site development that will include sewer capacky upgrades,
stormwater requirements, and pedestrian access. The dedication of either ROW or at a minimum
easement for emergency/access easement will be required at annexation. The actual
Construction of these will not be required until the site developments with the watertreatment
plant.
Response: All easements and pedestrian access will be addressed in the final design. SUB has
completed a Capacity Study and is designing the treatment plant accordingly. Final design will
have all easements to be recorded.
Transportation Engineering Comments:
1. Acknowledgement and inclusion of provisions fora future mukiuse path (through) the site must be
included in the Annexation Agreement to ensure future development will meet connectivity needs.
Response: The Annexation Agreement will have provisions for Multi -Use path and emergency
access.
2. Acknowledgement and inclusion of provisions for a secondary emergency access for 65^ street
must be included in the Annexation Agreement.
Response: The Annexation Agreement will have provisions for Multi -Use path and emergency
access.
--- End of Completeness Responses ---
The Satre Group .375 West 4xAvenue,Suite 201,&gene, OR 97401•(541) 698-0540. w .satrsacun.cam
Application #; CSP2009-
For City Use Only
FORM 1
PETITION/PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET
Annexation by Individuals
[SDC 5.7.125(2)(b)(I)/ORS 222.170(1) or ORS 222.127]
We, the following property owners of the following territory, consent to the annexation to the City of Springfield and concurrent
annexation to Wlllamalane Parks and Recreation District, as deemed necessary:
Date
Signature Signed
Print Name
Residence Address
Map and Tax Lot Number
'
"d
Acres
nVd/
(street clt, zip rode)
(example: 17-o4-03-00-00100)
owner
(qty)
Springfield Utility Board
No Address
17-02-27-00-02002
Yes
z.
3.
4.
5.
If -W,
Note: With the above aignamre(s), I am afalbul that I have the authority N consent to annemeon on my own behalf or on behalf of my firm or agency. (ANecb ewdenre ofsoch
outhooradon when applicable)
I, A GRf ouN (printed name of circulator), hereby certify that every person who signed this sheet did so in my presence.
ignature of Calculator)
CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP
The total landowners In the proposed annexation are I (qty). This petition reflects that I (qty) landowners (or legal representatives) listed
on this petition represent a total of 100 (%) of the landowners and J90 (%) of the acres as determined by the map and tax lots attached to the
petition. A&T fs not responsible fors bsequent deed activity that may not yet be reflected on the A&T computerized tax roll.
Lan ou per/S�iAss ssment and Taxation
Data Signed and CCeertiFlietl/ 3
Revised 04/17/2023 Am 12 of 16
FORM 2
OWNERSHIP WORKSHEET
(This form is NOT the petition)
(Please include the name and address of ALL owners regardless of whether they
signed an annexation petition or not.
OWNERS
Property
Designation
Ma lot number
Name of Owner
Acres
Assessed
Value
Imp.
Y / N
Signed
Yes
Signed
No
17-02-27-00-02002
Springfield Utility Board
4.42
$212,635
N
Yes
$212,635
VALUE CONSENTED FOR
PERCENTAGE OF VALUE CONSENTED FOR
TOTALS:
4.42
TOTAL NUMBER OF OWNERS IN THE PROPOSAL
1
NUMBER OF OWNERS WHO SIGNED
1
PERCENTAGE OF OWNERS WHO SIGNED
100%
TOTAL ACREAGE IN PROPOSAL
4.42
ACREAGE SIGNED FOR
4.42
PERCENTAGE OF ACREAGE SIGNED FOR
100%
TOTAL VALUE IN THE PROPOSAL
$212,635
VALUE CONSENTED FOR
PERCENTAGE OF VALUE CONSENTED FOR
Revised 04/17/2023 slm 13 of 16
FORM 3
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(Complete al/ the following questions and provide all the requested information. Attach
any responses that require additional space, restating the question or request for
Information on additional sheets.)
Contact Person:
John Anderson
E-mail: JohnA@satregroup.com
Supply the following information regarding the annexation area.
• Estimated Population (at present): 0
• Number of Existing Residential Units: 0
• Other Uses: Vacant Land
• Land Area: 4.42 total acres
• Existing Plan Designation(s): Low Density Residential
• Existing Zoning(s): Low Density Residential
• Existing Land Use(s): None
• Applicable Comprehensive Plan(s): Eugene -Springfield Metro Area General Plan
• Applicable Refinement Plan(s): None
• Provide evidence that the annexation is consistent with the applicable
comprehensive plan(s) and any associated refinement plans. The lot is within the
Eugene -Springfield Metro Plan and Is designated as residential. It is within the Springfield
Growth Boundary.
• Are there d�evelopment plans associated with this proposed annexation?
Yes 7] No
If yes, describe.
Water Treatment Plant
• Is the proposed use or development allowed on the property under the current
plan designation and zoning?
Yes 1:71Nom
Please describe where the proposed annexation Is contiguous to the city limits
(non-contiguous annexations cannot be approved under 5.7-140, Criteria).
The property Is adjacent to annexed property on the west, south, and east.
Annexation will not create an island.
Revised 04/17/2023 slm Page 14 of 16
Does this application include all contiguous property under the same ownership?
Yes E:1 No M✓
If no, state the reasons why all property is not included:
The northerly lot is not within the Urban Growth Boundary and cannot be annexed into the
• Check the special districts and others that provide service to the annexation area:
❑ Glenwood Water District
❑ Eugene School District
® Springfield School District
❑ Pleasant Hill RFPD
❑ EPUD
❑ Rainbow Water and Fire District
❑ Pleasant Hill School District
® McKenzie Fire & Rescue
❑ Willakenzie RFPD
® SUB
R Willamalane Parks and Rec District ❑ Other
• Names of persons to whom staff notes and notices should be sent, in addition to
applicant(s), such as an agent or legal representative.
John Anderson -The Satre Group A'.l clnisfi' 'sp~jput.( U}ili47'b.-4
(Name) (Name)
375 West 4th, Ste. 201 20;1- 50j4^ N*' $$)fu�
(Address)
Eugene, OR 97401
(City) (Zip)
(Name)
(Address)
(City)
(Zip)
(Address)
5v�5f-A'c, Cl?-
(city)
R(City) (Zip)
(Name)
(Address)
(City) (Zip)
Revised 04/17/2023 slm Page 15 of 16
FORM 4
WAIVER OF ONE YEAR TIME LIMIT
FOR ANNEXATION PURSUANT TO ORS 222.173
This waiver of the time limit is for the following described property:
17-02-23-CM2002
Map and Tax Lot Number
assigned)
None
Street Address of Property (if address has been
ONE WAIVER OF TIME LIMIT FOR EACH PARCEL, PLEASE
We, the owner(s) of the property described above understand the annexation
process can take more than one year but desire to annex to have City services.
Therefore, we agree to waive the one-year time limitation on this petition to
annex established by Oregon Revised Statutes 222.173, and further agree
that this contract shall be effective [../] indefinitely or [ ] until
Date
Signatures of Leqal Owners
Please Print or type name
Signature
Date Si ned
Greg Miller -Water Div. Dir.
L S_
LN6: Y1BCV008 BOIM'f/fiNGE 1MN5R/ONNEBLIGRON/ORMS�YRIHGFlELOf14WW UNM3EOfD/IMS�pPE3U6MIRiLpHNENq}ION4MLIGRON 100>-BB.00C
YSL]avM: May;3@]
Revised 04/17/2023 slm Page 16 of 16
August 25, 2023
SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD
MCKENZIE RIVER SOURCE DEVELOPMENT
Annexation
Map 17-02-27-00, Lot 02002
Public / Private Utility Plan rSDC 5.7-125(B)(1 2A
SDC 5.7-125(B)(12) calls for: A public private utility plan describing how the proposed affected territory
can be served by a full/minimum level of key urban facilities and services.
The Annexation Application calls for: A plan describing how the proposed annexation area can be served
by key facilities and services must be provided with the Annexation Agreement. Planning and Public
Works staff will work with the applicant to complete the Annexation Agreement.
In response, the Springfield Utility Board McKenzie River Source Annexation Application includes the
following Public/Private Utility Plan. This Public/Private Utility Plan describes what is known regarding
facility providers, existing facilities and anticipated service extension.
Existing Facilities. Providers and Service Extension
Key facilities and services as defined by the Metro Plan and how they will be met are as follows:
Stormwater
Provider:
Current:
On -Site: None.
Off -Site: Public —City of
Springfield.
Future:
On -Site: Private—SUB.
Off -Site: Public —City of
Springfield.
Existing Facilities:
Private:
None.
Public:
Existing public system on
the neighboring western
property. It is a 42 -inch
main.
Service Extension:
Private:
The line will be extended
from the neighboring
property.
Public:
No future extension. The
existing off-site public
system will continue to be
utilized.
Existing Storm and Sanitary Infrastructure
City of Springfield
2023
PLANNERS - LANOSCAPEARCNITECTS + ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS
37oWest4th, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 51401
Phone: 541.686.4540
www.SdtrBgroLip.com
Springfield Utility Board — McKenzie Water Source Development Page 2 of 3
Annexation — Public/Private Utility Plan
Wastewater
Provider: Current: None.
Future: City of
Springfield.
Existing Facilities: No public wastewater
system exists on the subject
property. There is, however,
existing public wastewater
infrastructure to the south,
in 69^ Street.
Service Extension: Should wastewater
infrastructure be needed for
the subject property in the
future, service would be
extended from 656 Street.
Transportation
Existing Storm and Sanitary Infrastructure
City of Spnngfeld
2D23
Provider: Streets:
City of Springfield.
Transit:
Lane Transit District (LTD).
Existing Facilities: Streets:
Existing streets nearest the subject property, and available for access,
are 65� Street to the south and 66� Street (to the east).
Transit:
LTD provides service currently.
Service Extension: Streets:
There is no need to extend public street service. The subject property
has existing access.
Transit:
Post annexation, LTD will continue to be the transit service provider.
Solid Waste Management
Solid waste service for un -annexed property is the responsibility ofthe property owner. Upon annexation,
service will be provided by a private service provider under contract with the City of Springfield. The
current service provider, underfranchise agreement with the City of Springfield, is Sanipac.
Water Service
Provider: Springfield Utility Board (SUB).
Existing Facilities: Service is on and adjacent to the =_
subject property, extending to the
north portion of 69h Street. The
property is going to have a water O
treatment plant on-site.
Service Extension: Service is on site and does not
need to be extended.
Existing Water Infrastructure
Springfield Utility Board �zL
2023
The Satre Group . 375 West 4^ Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 .(541) 686-4540.v✓.ve.s lregreup.com
Springfield Utility Board — McKenzie Water Source Development Page 3 of 3
Annexation — Public/Private Utility Plan
Electric Service
Provider: Springfield Utility Board (SUB).
Existing Facilities: Existing electric infrastructure is
adjacent to the subject property along
its western boundary.
Service Extension: The service would be extended to the
subject lot.
Existing Electric Infrastructure
Springfield Utility Board N
2023
1 'k33L. �..� n
Fire and Emergency Medical Services
Fire and emergency services are provided by McKenzie Fire & Rescue and Eugene Springfield Fire.
Upon annexation, Eugene Springfield Fire will continue to provide service.
Police Protection
The Lane County Sheriff provides service outside of the city limits. Upon annexation, service will be
provided by the Springfield Police Department for the subject property.
City Wide Parks and Recreation Programs
The site is within the boundaries of the Wllam alane Park and Recreation District. Park and recreation
services are provided to the subject property currently and will continue to be provided after annexation.
Land Use Controls
The City of Springfield is the planning and building permit services provider. This service will continue
after annexation.
Communication Facilities
Centuryl-ink provides land -line telephone service. Comcast provides cable service. Annexation will not
change this.
Public Schools
The site is served by the Springfield School District. Annexation will not change this.
The Satre Group . 375 W 4^ Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 .(541) 6B&4540.w.va.ednearoup.00m
ranch
ENGINEERING=
..nee i9u
June 1, 2023
ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TAX MAP 17-02-27, TL 2002
Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 23-273
Situated in the Urban Growth Boundary of the City of Springfield, Lane County, State of
Oregon in the Northeast % of Section 34, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, Willamette
Meridian, being more particularly described as follows:
All of Parcel 1 of Land Partition Plat Number 2007-P2118 as platted and recorded in the
Lane County Oregon Partition Plat Records, said Parcel 1 being more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Initial Point of said Land Partition Plat Number 2007-P2118, also being
the southeastern corner of said Parcel 1. THENCE along the southerly boundary of said
Parcel 1 North 89'38'42" West, 600.16 feet, more or less, to the southwestern corner of
said Parcel 1. THENCE along the westerly boundary of said Parcel 1 North 00'19'43" East,
314.37 feet, more or less, to the northwestern corner of said Parcel 1. THENCE along the
northerly boundary of said Parcel 1 North 89'04'14" East, 600.29 feet, more or less, to
the northeastern corner of said Parcel 1. THENCE along the easterly boundary of said
Parcel 1 South 00'19'33" West, 327.83 feet, more or less, RETURNING to the POINT of
BEGINNING.
The bearings and distances herein are based on land Partition Plat Number 2007-P2118
as platted and recorded in the Lane County Oregon Partition Plat Records.
REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYOR
DIGITALLY SIGNED
OREGON
NOVEMBER 30, 2007
RENEE CLOUGH
69162LS
RENEWAL DATE: 12/30/23
EUGENE -SPRIG FIELD PHILOMATH
310 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 1 p- 541.746.0637 1 w .branchengineenng.mm
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
This Annexation Agreement ("Agreement'D is made between the City of Springfield, an
Oregon municipal corporation (" City'D and Springfield Utility Board ("APPLICANT'D.
RECITALS
A. APPLICANT owns the parcel of land legally described in Exhibit A, the Property. The
property is proximate to the jurisdictional limits of the City and is subject to annexation by
the City of Springfield, .
B. APPLICANT has submitted to the City a request for Annexation, dated , for
Assessor's Map No. 17-02-27-00, Tax Lot 02002, which is not currently municipally
addressed and is more particularly described in Exhibit A.
C. APPLICANT wishes to annex the Property to the City and seeks support from the City for
the annexation.
D. The Property is inside the recognized Urban Growth Boundary of the City of Springfield.
The Property is within the Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District (UF -10) according to the
Springfield Zoning Map, and the underlying zoning is R-1 residential district.
E. Annexation of the Property requires a showing under SDC 5.7.140(C) that the Property can
be provided with the minimum level of key urban facilities and services as defined in Policy
31 of the Springfield 2030 Refinement Platt — Urbanization Element, and such showing is
supported by the substantial evidence in the record of the proceeding on this annexation.
City staff has determined the minimum level of key urban services is currently available to
the Property.
F. The purpose of this Agreement is to memorialize APPLICANT's and City's commitment
and agreement to the allocation of financial responsibility for public facilities and services
for the Property and other users of the facilities, sufficient to meet the City's requirements
for the provision of key urban services, including long term public sanitary sewer,
stormwater management systems, interconnected transportation systems, and Fire and Life
Safety services necessary for an affirmative City recommendation for the annexation
request.
After Recording, Return to: Place Bar Code Sticker Here:
City of Springfield
Atth: Current Development Division
Development & Public Works Department
225 Fifth Sheet
Springfield, OR 97477
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT — Page 1 of 7
G. A public sanitary sewer system with sufficient capacity to serve the Property and other
existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity of the Property is necessary to support a
finding that this key urban service is available to serve the Property.
• An existing public sanitary sewer system is located in 65^ Street with adequate
capacity for a residential development at typical densities. The 8" main is not sized
to support waste process water from a water treatment plant.
H. A public stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to serve the Property and
other existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity of the Property is also necessary to
support a finding that this key urban service is available to serve the Property.
• An existing public storm sewer system is located along the western property
boundary with sufficient capacity to accept runoff from the site, after appropriate
onsite treatment.
I. An interconnected transportation system with the existing and proposed land uses in the
vicinity of the Property is also required in order to provide access and a transportation
system for the provision of Fire and Life Safety services to and from the annexed property.
• The Property has legal and physical access to the current end of 65^ Street. The
portion of the adjacent property also owned by SUB (17-02-27-00-02003) that will
form part of the water treatment plant that is outside the UGB also has frontage along
661h Street which is in the UGB and currently unimproved.
• Additional right-of-way dedication or a public access easement and provisions for
installation of a multi -use path will be required for access from the existing
neighborhood from the east through the site to Thurston Middle School.
• City block length standards for future development require this lot to have a road
connection from 65' Street to 661h Street. The existing neighborhood to the south
along 65' Street to Thurston Road does not currently have any secondary emergency
access. The current number of homes from the single access point at 65' Street and
Thurston Road is in excess of the current limit of no more than 30 dwellings without
a secondary emergency access. The development of this lot with a high impact
public utility installation will require art secondary emergency access for the
existing homes on 65° street. This secondary emergency access may be combined
with the required pedestrian access required above.
I. In order to facilitate orderly development of the Property and ensure the firll provision of
key urban services that are satisfactory to the City and meet the City's conditions for an
affirmative recommendation for annexation to the Common Council, and in exchange for
the obligations of the City set forth below, APPLICANT shall comply with all requirements
imposed on APPLICANT in this Agreement.
Now, therefore based upon the foregoing Recitals, which are specifically made a part of this
Agreement, the parties agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. Obligations of APPLICANT. Consistent with the above Recitals, APPLICANT agrees to
perform the obligations set forth in this section.
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT — Page 2 of 7
1.1.1. APPLICANT shall upon development of the property as a water treatment plant
provide public right-of-way or a public access easement from the current end of 65'
Street to the School District property on the west (TL 17-02-34-12-00500) and to the
eastern private lot (TL 17-02-3-12-00100) of at least 12 feet in width to
accommodate a 10-foot-wide multiuse path. The exact location of this path can be
determined as part of the land use application.
1.1.2. APPLICANT shall upon development of the property as a water treatment plant
provide an emergency access route from the current end of 65° Street to either the
Thurston Middle School property or the eastern property boundary with TL 17-02-
34-12-00100, or both. The requirement for the public access easement (in Section
1.1.1 above) maybe combined with the emergency access route requirement in this
clause.
1.1.3. APPLICANT
grevidehas ruovided to the City a detailed canacity analysis report (`"£hurston Road
Sewer Capacity Evaluation for Membrane Filtration Plant" dated April 27, 2023) a
detailed Gapaoity for any planned process water discharges to the public
sewer system in accordance with the requirements in Chapter 2 of the Engineering
Design Standards ondProceduresMonual(EDSPM). The applicant will construct
any upgrades, if needed to sewer capacity shown by that analysis, in &ill, in a single
construction project using the City of Springfield's Public Improvement Permit (PIP)
process with the &ill cost to be by the applicant.
1.1.4. If this property develops as a residential subdivision or there is an addition of any
dwelling units and it is not developed as a water treatment plant, all the existing
requirements for extension of public roads and utilities apply in full and are required
to be reviewed, approved, and built using the City of Springfield PIP process. This
includes but is not limited to extension of 65' Street through the property to a
connection on the eastern property boundary with TL 17-02-03-12-00100 and a
pedestrian connection from the extension of 65^ Street to the west with the school
district property TL 17-02-34-12-00500.
1.2. APPLICANT shall provide and be financially responsible for the provision of any
additional urban facilities and services identified during the review and approval of any
Partition or Subdivision as necessary to serve the thither development of the Property,
including the construction and maintenance thereof.
1.3. In determining APPLICANT's share of costs for the improvements described in this
Agreement, the fill cost for the provision of the improvements at the time of construction
shall be used. For the purposes of this Agreement, the fill cost shall include design,
construction, acquisition of land and/or easements, studies, permits from all agencies
having jurisdiction, attorney's fees, and all other costs reasonably associated with the
implementation of the needed improvements.
2. Obligations of Citv. Consistent with the above Recitals, City agrees to:
2.1 Process the annexation request for the Property to the City before the Common Council,
and support APPLICANT's defense of any appeal of a decision to the City. However, the
City will not assume any financial responsibility to provide legal counsel on appeal.
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT — Page 3 of 7
3. Covenants Running With the Land. It is the intention of the parties that the covenants herein are
necessary for the annexation and development of the Property and as such shall run with the
Property and shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, assigns, administrators, and successors
of the parties hereto, and shall be construed to be a benefit to and burden upon the Property.
This Agreement shall be recorded, at APPLICANT's expense, upon its execution in the Lane
County Deeds and Records. This Agreement may be assigned by APPLICANT and shall
benefit any assigns or successors in interest to APPLICANT. Execution of this Agreement is a
precondition to the support of the City for annexation of the Property described in Exhibit A to
the City. Accordingly, the City retains all rights for enforcement of this Agreement.
4. Limitations on the Development. No portion of the Property shall be further developed prior to
the approval of a Site Plan Review, building permit approval, partition, or subdivision, as
applicable, for the proposed development.
5. Mutual Cooperation. City and APPLICANT shall endeavor to mutually cooperate with each
other in implementing the various matters contained herein.
6. Waiver of Right of Remonstrance. APPLICANT agrees to sign any and all waivers, petitions,
consents and all other documents necessary to obtain the public facilities and services described
herein as benefiting the Property, under any Improvement Act or proceeding of the State of
Oregon, Lane County, or the City and to waive all rights to remonstrate against these
improvements. APPLICANT does not waive the right to protest the amount or manner of
spreading the assessment thereof, if the assessment appears to APPLICANT to be inequitable or
operate unfairly upon the Property. APPLICANT waives any right to file a written
remonstrance against these improvements. APPLICANT does not waive its right to comment
upon any proposed Local Improvement District (LID) or any related matters orally or in writing.
7. Modification of Agreement. This Agreement may only be modified in writing signed by both
parties. Any modifications to this Agreement shall require the approval of the Springfield
Common Council. This Agreement shall not be modified such that the minimum level of key
urban facilities and services as defined in Policy 31 of the Springfield 2030Refinemeni Plan —
Urboncation Element and as required herein are not provided in a timely manner to the
Property.
8. Land Use. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as waiving any requirements of the
Springfield Development Code or Springfield Municipal Code which may be applicable to the
use and development of this Property. Nothing herein shall be construed as City providing or
agreeing to provide approval of any building, land use, or other development application or
Land and Drainage Alteration Program (LDAP) permit application submitted by APPLICANT.
APPLICANT is responsible for obtaining, at APPLICANT's expense, all State and/or Federal
permits and any other approvals as may be required.
9. Dolan. APPLICANT knows and understands any rights it may have under the law as
interpreted in Dolan v. City of Tigard 512 US 374 (1994) and subsequent cases interpreting the
legal effect of Dolan and by entering into this Agreement hereby waives any requirement that
the City demonstrate the public improvements and other obligations of APPLICANT, for
payments, financial responsibility and reimbursements set forth in Section 1, required herein,
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT — Page 4 of 7
are roughly proportional to the burden and demands placed upon the urban facilities and
services by the development and to the impacts of the development of the Property.
APPLICANT further waives any cause of action it may have pursuant to Dolan v. City of
Tigard and cases interpreting the legal effect of Dolan arising out of the actions described
herein.
10. Ballot Measures 37/49/ORS 195.300 et seg. APPLICANT knows and understands any rights it
may have under Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 195.300 et seq., "Just Compensation
for Land Use Regulation." APPLICANT for itself and its heirs, executors, assigns,
administrators and successors hereby waives any claim or cause of action it may have under
such ORS provisions against the City.
11. Invalidity. If any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed unenforceable or invalid, such
enforceability or invalidity shall not affect the enforceability or validity of any other provision
of this Agreement. The validity, meaning, enforceability, and effect of the Agreement and the
rights and liabilities of the parties hereto shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the
State of Oregon.
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT — Page 5 of 7
DATED this day of 20
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the APPLICANT and City have executed this Agreement as of the date
first herein above written.
APPLICANT
By:
STATE OF ORE=
LANE SS
Date
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME ON 120 BY
(APPLICANT)
OF
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT — Page 6 of 7
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
By:
Nancy Newton, City Manager
STATE OF OREGON 55
COUNTY OF LANE J
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME ON 120 BY
AS
(CITY)
OF
NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT — Page 7 of 7