Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecision Planner 8/12/2019bu STATE OF OREGON ) )ss County of Lane ) l, Shannon Morris, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows: 1. I state that I am an Administrative Specialist for the Planning Division of the Development and Public Works Department, City of Springfield, Oregon. 2. I state that in my capacity as, Admin istrative Specialist, I and caused tg be mailed copies of + d,uistovr (See attachment "A") on 2419 addressed to (see tAttachment "B"), by causing letters to be placed in a U.S. mail box with postage fully prepaid thereon. Shannon Morris STATE OF OREGON, County of Lane O,-,J E+-,2019 , Personally appeared the above named Shannon @Specialist,whoacknowledgedtheforegoinginstrument to be their voluntary act. Before me: q \ @ OFFICIAL STAMP IGTRIIIA AXDER,SO}I NOTARY PUBLIC.OREGON coMMrssloN No. 967995 rY c01flil8s10il EIP,|RES 00I08ER 31, ml My Commission Expires:\o 3t >o>\ AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE APFINOFIII.D Type II Single Family Home & Accessory Dwelling Units Washburne Historic District Staff Report & Decision Proiect Name: 337 D Street - New Primary Dwelling and Two Accessory Dwelling Unit in the Washburne Historic District Nature of Application: The applicant has submitted two applications; one for a new primary dwelling; and a second for two additional accessory dwelling units on an undeveloped parcel in the Washburne Historic District. Case Number:811-19-000136 & 737-TYP? - Historic Site Review and two Accessory Dwelling Units located in the Washburne Historic District. Proiect Location: 337 D Street, Springfield, O& Map 77-03-35-24 and Tax Lot 9900. Current Site Conditions: The subject property is located at the intersection of D Street and 4th Street. The property is 6,000 square feet and currently vacant. Zoning: Medium Density Residential (MDR) Metro Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential (MDR) Zoning of Surrounding Properties: Medium Density Residential (MDR) ApplicationAcceptedDate: |une7,2079 Decision Issued Date: August 72,2019 Appeal Deadline: August 28,2019 Recommendation: Approved with Conditions detailed in this decision; all revisions shall be shown on the Final Plot Plan. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: Tim and Betty Olguin 407 C Street Springfield, OR97477 Applicant's Representative: N/A 1 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM POSITION REVIEW OF NAME PHONE Planner Development Code Drew Larson 736-1003 Public Works Sanitary & Storm Sewer Clayton McEachern 736-7036 DepuW Fire Marshal Fire and Life SafeW Eric Phillips-Meadow 726-2293 Building Official Buildins Code Robert Castile 726-3666 ADU - 811-19-000136 &137-TvP2 A.tt /JJftvvwu A I I V ?T1' I I l;g GI rI s al. c---Sqeet lESStreet * ;r,?qo L Background: The site previously contained two detached homes, 432 & 442 4th Street that were constructed around 1907. These structures were demolished in 1987 following a letter issued by the City of Springfield's structural inspector which identified many building code violations that would need to be repaired prior to occupancy. The financial institution elected to demolish the two detached homes; however, no records were located for demolition. REVIEW PROCESS SDC section 5.1-130 (The Development Review Process) states that Type ll applications shall be distributed to the Development Review Committee and the Historical Commission for comments. Type II decisions are made by the Director after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed. The proposal was reviewed by the Development Review Committee and comments were received from the Historic Commission. The Historic Commission meeting was held on Tuesday, June 11, 2019 and stated support of the proposed primary dwelling and two ADUs. PUBLIC COMMENTS Applications for Type II limited land use decisions require notification of property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the subject property allowing for a 14-day comment period on the application per SDC 5.1- 130. The property owner, applicant if different, and parties submitting written comments during the comment period have appeal rights and are mailed a copy of this decision for consideration. In accordance with SDC 5.1-130, notice was mailed to the property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the subject property on fune 13,2019. Purpose: An accessory dwelling unit is intended to provide the opportunity to add accessible and affordable units to existing neighborhoods and new residential areas; Provide flexibility to accommodate changes in household size or composition over the course of time, allowing for intergenerational living and on-site caretakers/assistants; Make efficient use of residential land; and Fit into the neighborhood while maintaining stability, property values, and, in the case of low-density residential zones, the single-family residential appearance of the neighborhood. Criteria of Approval: In order to grant Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) approval, the Director shall determine compliance with all applicable Accessory Dwelling Unit and Historic Overlay District standards specified below: Section 2.1-1 15 Applicability o In addition to the requirements of this Code, all uses and development shall comply with all other applicable City, regional, State, and Federal regulations. Condition: The two Accessory Dwelling Units shall comply with all applicable portions of the Springfield Development Code. Plans submitted at the time of building permit application shall substantially conform to the approved plans. Section 5.15-125 ADU Development Standards A) The accessory dwelling unit shall meet all applicable standards in this Code including, but not limited to; setbacks, height, lot/parcel coverage, solar access and building codes in effect at the time of construction. Finding: The proposed primary dwelling and ADUs meet all applicable base zone development standards . Conclusion: As submitted, this proposal satisfies Criterion A. 2ADU - 811-19-000136 &737-WP2 WATER AND ELECTRIC UTILITY Finding: The ADU will require its own water and electric meter that will need three feet of clearance around the meter. Condition: Prior to Building Permit approval, the applicant shall coordinate with Springfield Utility Board prior to installation of utilities and for final meter locations. This information shall be shown on the Building Permit plot plan. SANITARYSEWER Finding: Section 4.3-105.A of the SDC requires that sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains. Additionally, installation of sanitary sewers shall provide sufficient access for maintenance activities. Finding: Section 4.3-105.A of the SDC requires that sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains. Additionally, installation of sanitary sewers shall provide sufficient access for maintenance activities. Finding: City records show a lateral being located approximately at the location shown on the proposed site plan. Condition and size of this lateral is unknown. Condition: Prior to occupancy of the Accessory Dwelling Unif applicant will obtain an encroachment permit for this sanitary connection, to verify location and condition of the existing lateral and install a cleanout at the approximately property line between this site and the alley. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Finding: Section 4.3-110.B of the SDC requires that the Approval Authority shall grant development approval only where adequate public and/or private stormwater management systems provisions have been made as determined by the Public Works Director, consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). Finding: Section 4.3-110.C of the SDC states that a stormwater management system shall accommodate potential run-off from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside of the development. Finding: Section 4.3-110.D of the SDC requires that run-off from a development shall be directed to an approved stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to accept the discharge. Finding: The applicant has not provided any stormwater details or plans to manage the increase in runoff from the development of this site. Finding: The existing public stormwater system, adjacent to this site on 4th street can accept the roof runoff from this site directly into the catch basin located at the corner of 4th and D St. No provision is shown for routing stormwater from the parking area on this site. Condition: Prior to Building Permit approval, The applicant will design and show on the final site plans all stormwater improvements, necessary to route stormwater from the roofs on this site directly into the storm drain system. Condition: Prior to Building Permit approval, the applicant will design and shown on the final site plan stormwater treatment areas sufficient to treat the parking area and any attached alley runoff that currently drains into the site. WATERQUAJ,ITY Finding: Under Federal regulation of the Clean Water Act (CWA), Endangered Species Act (ESA), and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), the City of Springfield has obtained a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. A provision of this permit requires the City JADU - 811-19-000136 EE137-TYP2 demonstrate efforts to reduce the pollution in urban stormwater to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP). Finding: Federal and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (0DEQ) rules require the City's M54 plan address six "Minimum Control Measures." Minimum Control Measure 5, "Post-Construction Stormwater Management for New Development and Redevelopment," applies to the proposed development. Finding: Minimum Control Measure 5 requires the City of Springfield to develop, implement and enforce a program to ensure the reduction of pollutants in stormwater runoff to the MEP. The City must also develop and implement strategies that include a combination of structural or non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriated for the community. Finding: Minimum Control Measure 5 requires the City of Springfield use an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism to address post construction runofffrom new and re-development projects to the extent allowable under State law. Regulatory mechanisms used by the City include the Springfield Development Code (SDC), the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM) and the future Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SFMP). Finding: As required in Section 4.3-110.E of the SDC, "a development shall be required to employ drainage management practices approved by the Public Works Director and consistent with Metro Plan policies and the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual." Finding: Section 3.01 of the City's EDSPM states the Public Works Department will accept, as interim design standards for stormwater quality, water quality facilities designed pursuant to the City of Eugene Stormwater Management Manual. Finding: Section 3.02 of the City's EDSPM states all public and private development and redevelopment projects shall employ a system of one or more post-developed BMPs that in combination are designed to achieve at least a 70 percent reduction in the total suspended solids in the runoffgenerated by that development. Section 3.03,4.E of the manual requires a minimum of 50 percent of the non-building rooftop impervious area on a site shall be treated for stormwater quality improvement using vegetative methods. Finding: To meet the requirements of the City's M54 permit, the Springfield Development Code, and the City's EDSPM, the applicant has not proposed any stormwater treatment for the site. Finding: The vegetation proposed for use in the swales will serve as the primary pollutant removal mechanism for the stormwater runofi and will remove suspended solids and pollutants through the processes of sedimentation and filtration. Satisfactory pollutant removal will occur only when the vegetation has been fully established. Finding: The location of the stormwater treatment area has not been shown with sufficient details to meet the requirements set forth in Eugene Stormwater Management Manual. There was no inclusion of a stormwater treatment area detail drawing on the plan set. Condition: Prior to Building Permit approval, the applicant will design and show on the final plot plan a stormwater treatment area for the parking area shown on the proposed site plan. Condition: Prior to Building Permit approval, the applicant shall provide an operations and maintenance plan to the City for review to ensure the long-term maintenance and operation of the proposed Stormfilter Catchbasin, consistent with maintenance criteria required by EDSPM 3.03.1. The plan should designate maintenance responsibility for operating and maintaining the system, and should be distributed to all property owners and tenants ofthe site. 4ADU - 811-19-000136 &.137-TYP2 Condition: Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall submit a suitable vegetation plan for the proposed stormwater treatment area. The City of Eugene stormwater management manual and Chapter 6 ofthe EDSPM may be referenced for design. Condition: To ensure a fully functioning water quality system and meet objectives of Springfield's M54 permit, the Springfield Development Code and the EDSPM, the proposed stormwater management area shall be shall be fully vegetated with all vegetation species established prior to approval of Final site inspection. Alternatively, if this condition cannot be met, the applicant shall provide and maintain additional interim erosion control/water quality measures acceptable to the Public Works Department that will suffice until such time as the swale vegetation becomes fully established. PUBLIC STREETS. SIDEWALKS & IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS Finding: All adjacent infrastructure appears to be in good repair and no additional work is required at this time. UTILITIES. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY Finding: Section 4.3-140.A of the SDC requires applicants proposing developments make arrangements with the City and each utility provider for the dedication of utility easements necessary to fully service the development or land beyond the development area. Finding: No additional right of way or easements are required with this development. OTHER PERMITS N/A OTHER NOTE: The intent of this list is to give a developer insight about requirements that may apply before they develop their property. B) The accessory dwelling unit shall contain a kitchen, bathroom, living, and sleeping area that are completely independent from the primary dwelling. Finding: The ADU proposed floor plans shows all applicable dwelling unit amenities, including a kitchen, bathroom, living, and sleeping area. Conclusion: As submitted, this proposal satisfies Criterion B, C) The accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 800 square feet or the square footage of the primary dwelling fexclusive of the garage for the primary dwelling), whichever is less. Finding: The attached ADU will be 784 square feet and the detached ADU will be 7 68 square feet which does not exceed the size ofthe primary residence,840 square feet' Conclusion: As submitted, this proposal satisfies Criterion C, D) The accessory dwelling unit shall have an outside entrance that is separate from the entrance to the primary dwelling.* A hard surface walkway, a minimum of 3 feet wide, shall be required from the primary entrance of the accessory dwelling unit to the street or walkway serving the primary dwelling. Finding: The two ADU have direct access from the adjacent street network and each has a separate entrance. 5ADU - 811-19-000136 &.137-TYP2 Conclusion: As submitted, this proposal satisfies Criterion D E) Each dwelling shall have its own address. Finding: The proposed ADU will be assigned a separate address at the time of building permit. Conclusion: As submitted, this proposal satisfies Criterion E F) There shall be 1 parking space 9 feet by 18 feet in size for the accessory dwelling unit, in addition to the parking spaces required by Section 4.6-100 for the primary dwelling. The parking space for the accessory dwelling may be provided either on-street or off-street as described in Section 5.5- 12s(F)(1-4). Finding: The applicant has provided two off-street parking spaces for the primary dwelling and on-street parking for the proposed ADUs. Conclusion: As conditioned, this proposal satisfies Criterion F G) Outdoor storage and garbage areas shall be screened from view from adiacent properties and those across the street or alley with a minimum 42-inch tall 10O-percent site obscuring fence or enclosure on at least 3 sides. Finding: The applicant did not indicate where the trash area will be located on-site. This will need to be shown on the building permit plot plan and provide screening as necessary. Condition: Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall indicate on the building permit plot plan the location ofthe trash area on-site and provide screening as necessary. Conclusion: As conditioned, this proposal satisfies Criterion G. Section 5.5-130 ADU Design Standards A) The Accessory Dwelling Unit shall match the primary dwelling, An accessory dwelling unit may be approved under Type 1 procedure if it meets the following design standards except that these standards may be altered when necessary to meet current fire or building codes: 1. Exterior finish materials shall be the same as or visually match those of the primary dwelling in terms of type, size, and placement. 2. Roof pitch shall be the same as the predominate roof pitch of the primary dwelling. 3. The trim around the doors and windows shall be the same type and finish as the primary dwelling. 4. Windows shall match those of the primary dwelling in terms of proportion (height and width ratio) and orientation (vertical vs. horizontal). 5. Eaves shall proiect from the accessory dwelling unit addition the same distance as the eaves on tle primary dwelling. Finding: The applicant's narrative states that the ADU will substantially match the primary dwelling in terms of type, size, trim, finish materials, roof pitch, windows, and eve projections. In addition, the applicants propose a similar color scheme as the primary dwelling. Conclusion: As submitted, this proposal satisfies Criterion A. 6ADU - 811-19-000136 &.137-WP2 Type II Historical Review approval as of the date of this letter, subiect to the conditions and recommendations described herein. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL (SDC Section 3.3-945 Maior and Minor Alteration Standards) 1. Any proposed use shall minimize exterior alteration of the Historic Landmark Site or Structure and its environment; uses that require substantial exterior alteration shall not be permitted. Finding: The parcel is currently vacant and the applicant is proposing a new primary dwelling and two accessory dwelling units. Conclusion: Criterion 1 is not applicable. 2. The distinguishing original qualities of the Historic Landmark Site or Structure and its environment shall not be substantially altered. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features is prohibited unless an immediate hazard to public safety exists. Finding: The site is vacant and there are no distinguishing qualities to alter Conclusion: Criterion 2 is not applicable. 3. All Historic Landmark Sites or Structures are recognized as products of their own time. Alterations which have no historic basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance are prohibited. Findingl The site is vacant so there are no structures that are recognized as products of their own time. Conclusion: Criterion 3 is not applicable, 4, Changes that have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a Historic Landmark Site or structure and its environment. Where changes have acquired significance in their own right, this significance shall be recognized. Finding: The site is vacant and has no significant historic value. Conclusion: Criterion 4 is not applicable. 5. Distinctive stylistic features and examples of local or period craftsmanship which characterize a Historic Landmark Site or Structure shall be retained. Finding: The site is vacant so no distinctive feature will be removed. Conclusion: Criterion 5 is not applicable. 6, Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced. In the event replacement cannot be avoided, the new material shall match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture and visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features is based on accurate duplicate features, substantiated by historic, physical or pictorial evidence rather than on coniectural design, or the availability of different architectural elements from other buildings or structures. Finding: There are no proposed repairs. Conclusion: Criterion 6 is not applicable. 7ADU - 811-19-000136 &137-WP2 7. New design for undeveloped Historic Landmark Sites in the Washburne Historic Landmark District and for alterations and additions to existing Historic Landmark Sites and Structures are permitted when they complement significant historic, architectural or cultural features and the design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood or environment. Finding: The Springfield Historic Design Guidelines state that new construction should complement the existing pattern of the Historic District and neighborhood. A new building should use a similar architectural vocabulary as its neighbors. The following are guidelines for new construction: New construction should be set back to match the setback ofthe surrounding buildings. The front setback should be a yard, not a parking area. Orient the building front to the street. Building entries should be at the front of the building facing the street. The size and scale of new buildings should be consistent with that of the surrounding buildings in the neighborhood. Siding materials used on new buildings should be consistent with the predominant materials used on other buildings in the neighborhood. It is preferable to use wood siding; vinyl, aluminum, and other non-historic sidings are not acceptable in historic neighborhoods. Use decorative detailing sparingly and locate it at the eaves, window and door heads, and porch. Do not attempt to create a false historic appearance. The roof form of the new building should be compatible with that of existing buildings on the block. For example, if all of the houses on the block have medium-pitched, front-facing gabled roofs, the new buildings should also have a front-facing gabled roof of a medium pitch rather than a shallow- pitched shed roof. The foundation should be constructed ofconcrete, either poured or simple block. Avoid decorative concrete blocks that have no relation to historic materials. The relationship of width to height of windows and doors should be consistent with the dominant pattern set by the surrounding historic buildings, as should the rhythm of walls to openings. The use of porches should be compatible with that of surrounding historic buildings. If nearby houses have porches, consider designing the new building with a porch compatible in style and scale. lf nearby houses are of a vintage where porches were not included, the new building may be designed without a front porch, or with one that is modest and unobtrusive. Although color choice is a personal decision for the property owner, it can greatly affect how a new building fits into the neighborhood. Consider selecting colors that are compatible with the surrounding buildings. Finding: The applicants have proposed one primary dwelling and two accessory dwelling units; one attached to the primary and one detached. New construction will resemble the WWII Era Cottage style and will complement the existing pattern of the neighborhood. Finding: The design guidelines call for wood siding and the review criteria states that new design shall complement significant historic, architectural or cultural features and the design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character ofthe property, neighborhood or environment. Finding: The applicants propose hardy board cement siding that resembles wood siding; this is not permitted. Condition: Prior to Building Permit approval, the applicant shall revise the site plan and elevations to include wood windows, doors, and siding to complement significant historic, architectural or cultural a o a a 8ADU - 811-19-000136 &137-TvP2 features and the design is generally compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood or environment. Conclusion: As conditioned, this proposal satisfies Criterion 7 8. New additions or alterations to Historic Landmark Structures shall not impair the essential form and integrity ofthe structure. Finding: The proposed ADU will not detract from the existing primary dwelling. Conclusion: As submitted, this proposal satisfies Criterion 8. DECISION Type II Historical Review approval as ofthe date ofthis letter. Fagade restoration with drop siding shall be the main priority. APPEAL: This Type II Historic Review decision is considered a decision of the Director and as such may be appealed to the Planning Commission. The appeal may be filed with the Development Services Department by an affected par[. Your appeal must be in accordance with SDC 5.3-100, Appeals. An Appeals application must be submitted with a fee of $250.00. The fee will be returned to the applicant if the Planning Commission approves the appeal application. Timelines and Conditions of Approval: The property owner and/or applicant shall comply with the standards specified herein within 2 years of the Director's approval as follows: A. Approval of a building permit within 1 year of the Director's approval, including the following Conditions of Approval : l. The two Accessory Dwelling Units shall comply with aII applicable portions of the Springlield Development Code. Plans submitted at the time of building permit application shall substantially conform to the approved plans as amended by conditions. 2, Prior to Building Permit approval, the applicant shall coordinate with Springfield Utility Board prior to installation of utilities and for final meter locations. This information shall be shown on the Building Permit plot plan. 3. Prior to occupancy of the Accessory Dwelling Unit, applicant will obtain an encroachment permit for this connection, to verify location and condition of the existing lateral and install a cleanout at the approximately property line between this site and the alley betweenCandDStreets. 4, Prior to Building Permit approval, The applicant will design and show on the final site plans all stormwater improvements, necessary to route stormwater from the roofs on this site directly into the storm drain system. 5. Prior to Building Permit approval, the applicant will design and shown on the final site plan stormwater treatment areas sufficient to treat the parking area and any attached alley runoffthat currently drains into the site. 6. Prior to Building Permit approval, the applicant will design and show on the final plot plan a stormwater treatment area for the parking area shown on the proposed site plan. 9ADU - 811-19-000136 &137-TvPz In accordance with SDC 5.3-115.B which provides for a 15-day appeal period and Oregon Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 10[cJ for service of notice by mail, the appeal period for this decision expires at 5:00 PM on fuly 30, 2019. 7. Prior to Building Permit approval, the applicant shall provide an operations and maintenance plan to the City for review to ensure the long-term maintenance and operation of the proposed Stormfilter Catchbasin, consistent with maintenance criteria required by EDSPM 3.03.1. The plan should designate maintenance responsibility for operating and maintaining the system, and should be distributed to all property owners and tenants ofthe site. 8. Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall submit a suitable vegetation plan for the proposed stormwater treatment area. The City of Eugene stormwater management manual and Chapter 6 ofthe EDSPM may be referenced for design. 9. To ensure a fully functioning water quality system and meet obiectives of Springfield's MS4 permit, the Springfield Development Code and the EDSPM, the proposed stormwater management area shall be shall be fully vegetated with all vegetation species established prior to approval of Final site inspection. Alternatively, if this condition cannot be met, the applicant shall provide and maintain additional interim erosion control/water quality measures acceptable to the Public Works Department that will suffice until such time as the swale vegetation becomes fuIly established. 10. Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall indicate on the building permit plot plan the location of the trash area on-site and provide screening as necessary. 11. Prior to Building Permit approval, the applicant shall revise the site plan and elevations to include wood windows, doors, and siding to complement significant historic, architectural or cultural features and the design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material and character ofthe property, neighborhood or environment B. The construction of the accessory dwelling unit shall be complete within 1 year of Building Permit issuance. If this time line cannot be met, the applicant may submit a written request for a single 1- year extension for completion. C. If the timeline established for completion of construction in Subsection B. above is not met and the applicant has not requested an extension, then the Director shall declare the application null and void. D. Upon satisfactory completion of Accessory Dwelling Unit, as determined by a Final Site Inspection (prior to the final building inspection), the City shall authorize the provision of public facilities and services and issue a Certificate of0ccupancy or otherwise authorize use ofthe site. E. All required improvements shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of 0ccupancy or Final Building Inspection for the development, unless improvements have been deferred for good cause by the Director as noted below: Permits That May Be Required: o Building Permit . Encroachment Permit (working within right-of-way or public easements) r Driveway Permit . Land & Drainage Alteration Permits (LDAP). [Contact the Springfield Public Works Departrnent @ 7 26-5849 for appropriate applications/requirementsl Pay applicable Systems Development Charges when building permits are issued for developments rvithin the City limits or within the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary. [The cost relates to the amount of increase in impervious surface area, transportation trip rates, and plumbing fixture units. Some exceptions apply to Springfield Urban Growth areas.J [Springfield Code Chapter II, Article 11] ADU - 811-19-000136 &."r37-WP2 10 Systems Development Charges (SDC's) will apply to the construction of buildings and site improvements within the subject site. The Charges will be based upon the rates in effect at the time of permit submittal for buildings or site improvements on each portion or phase of the development. Additional Information: The application, all documents, and evidence relied upon by the applicant, and the applicable criteria ofapproval are available for free inspection and copies are available for a fee at the Development Services Department, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon. Appeals: This Type II Historic Review decision is considered a decision of the Director and as such may be appealed to the Planning Commission. The appeal may be filed with the Development Services Department by an affected party. Your appeal must be in accordance with SDC 5.3-100, Appeals. An Appeals application must be submitted with a fee of $250.00. The fee will be returned to the applicant if the Planning Commission approves the appeal application. In accordance with SDC 5.3-115,B which provides for a 15-day appeal period and Oregon Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 10(c) for service of notice by mail, the appeal period for this decision expires at 5:00 PM on August 22,2019. Questions: Please call Andrew Larson in the Planning Division of the Development and Public Works Department at(547)736-1003 ifyou have any questions regarding this process. ADU - 811-19-000136 &137-T\P2 11 ( CITY OF SPRI NGFIELD DeveloPment & Public Works 225 5th sT oR 97477ld,Springfie Tim & BettY 0iguin 407 C Street ^ipii.gii.ld, ot e7417 MW