Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application Applicant 8/22/2023 (2)
City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW - TYPE 2 SPRINGFIELD W ok Application Type o Site Plan Review Completeness Check ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal ❑ Final Site Plan Submittal Required Project Information (Applicant: Applicant Name: Niles Hanson Complete this Section) Phone:541-747-0034 Company: Rosen Sunvisor Systems Email: Niles@nwstamping.com Address: 4884 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403 Applicant's Rep:Jimi Witt Phone: 541-338-9488 x1006 Company: Johnson Broderick Engineering Email: jimi@jbe.us.com Address: 325 West 13th Avenue, Eugene, OR 97401 Property Owner: Niles Hanson Phone: 541-747-0034 Company: Rosen Sunvisor Systems Email: Niles@nwstamping.com Address: 4884 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-03-3-14 TAX LOT NO(S): 2000 & 2001 Property Address (if applicable): 4884 Franklin Boulevard, Eugene, OR 97403 Size of Property: 1.77 0 5`q.r� Units Per Acre: N/A Proposed Project Name: New Storage Addition Proposal: See attached Existing Use: Light Medium Industrial New Impervious Area (Sq. Ft.): 0 Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: Associated Applications: Complete This Section) Placard: Case No: Date: Reviewed By: Application Fee: $ Tech Fee: $ Notice Fee: $ TOTAL FEE: $ PROJECT NO: Jw1wr I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application Is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.176 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: I wpw Date: g-11-1-3 Signature NLuF W4 0 Print '{y/�- , n � f67.11 Date: a-Cc- qp Signature LLt�S Idy�CS6� Print Type 2 - Site Plan Review Application Process A. A Type 2 application involves the Director's interpretation and exercise of discretion when evaluating approval standards. Uses or development evaluated through this process are uses that are conditionally permitted or allowed after Director review that may require the imposition of conditions of approval to ensure compliance with development and approval standards. (SDC 5.1.415(A)). B. A Type 2 decision is made by the Director after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed. AType 2 application is reviewed according to the procedures below, unless the Director determines that the application should be reviewed as a Type 3 decision. A Type 2 decision may be appealed according to SDC 5.1.600. (SDC 5.1.415(B)). C. When application materials are over 20 pages in length, an applicant must provide an identical electronic version and hard copy of the submitted materials. (SDC 5.1.215(B)(2)). 1. Site Plan Review Completeness Check Meeting • The purpose of the completeness check meeting is to determine whether the proposed development application is complete prior to acceptance of the application for processing by the City. A complete application is required for the review process. • The completeness check meeting will examine if the submittal standards of SDC 5.1.220 and 5.17.115 are met. • A completeness check meeting is required for all Type 2 and 3 land use applications. • Completeness Check Meetings are typically held within five to seven working days of application submittal. • The application must conform with Application Submittal Standards in SDC 5.1.220, the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements found in the SDC 5.17.155, and the Checklist provided in this form below. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Completeness Check Meeting • The applicant, owner, and associated design team are strongly encouraged to attend the Completeness Check meeting, however it is not required. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. • The Case Planner provides the applicant with a Completeness Check Meeting Checklist specifying items required to make the application complete. • The applicant has 160 days to submit a complete Site Plan Review application to the city; a second Completeness Check meeting is required after the 160 days. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application • The application must conform with the Application Submittal Standards in SDC 5.1.220, the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements found in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.17.155, and the Checklist provided below. • An application will be reviewed for completeness in accordance with SDC 5.1.405. • A Type 2 decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 12 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official, as applicable. Type 2 - Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist Please Note: • All the following items MUST be submitted. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why in the attached narrative. • When application or appeal materials are over 20 pages in length, an applicant must provide an identical electronic version and hard copy of the submitted materials. ❑ Site Plan Review Application Form ❑ Application Fee - Refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. ❑ An electronic copy of all application materials (USB drive or other) submitted at the time of application (if total submittal package is over 20 pages). ❑ Proof of ownership, e.g., deed or other recorded document ❑ Concurrent applications where a proposal involves more than one (1) application ❑ State or Federal Permit Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Completed Attached Stormwater Scoping Sheet One (1) Hard Copy of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: ❑ Application materials must be submitted as required below in addition to the requirements in SDC 5.1.220, Application Submittal Standards. Applications that do not include all the necessary information may be deemed incomplete in accordance with SDC 5.1.225, Acceptance of Application. Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or in part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. ❑ General Requirements. See SDC 5.17.115(A). ❑ Be prepared by a design professional, licensed in the state of Oregon, when required by state law, such as an engineer, architect, landscape architect, land surveyor, or other qualified professional as determined by the Director; ❑ Be drawn to scale with the scale indicated on the plans, and the scale sized appropriately for the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan related to the approval standards; ❑ Include a north arrow and date of preparation and/or revision; ❑ Provide the physical address of the subject property, if applicable, and the County assessor's tax map and lot number; ❑ Provide the names and addresses of all persons listed as owners on the most recently recorded deed; ❑ Provide the name, address, email address, and telephone number of any person that assisted in preparing the application materials or plans; and ❑ Show the size of the property and development area in acres or square feet. ❑ Existing Conditions Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(8)). The application must include an existing site conditions plan that shows, for the entire property and the surrounding property to a distance of 150 feet from the subject property boundaries: ❑ The property boundaries, dimensions, and gross area; ❑ Topographic contour lines at one -foot intervals for slopes equal to or less than ten percent and at two -foot intervals for slopes greater than ten percent; ❑ The location and width of all public and private streets, drives, sidewalks, pathways, rights-of-way, and easements; ❑ Potential natural hazard areas, including areas mapped by the City, County, or State as having a potential for geologic hazards; ❑ Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; ❑ Resource areas, including wetlands on the City's Local Wetlands Inventory, streams, surface mines, and wildlife habitat identified by the City or any natural resource regulatory agencies as requiring protection; ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow, and top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map and their riparian areas; ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision; ❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3.200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department; ❑ Features, including existing structures, pavement, large rock outcroppings, drainage ways, canals and ditches; ❑ The location, size and species of trees and other vegetation having a caliper (diameter) of six inches or greater at four feet above grade; and ❑ Locally or federally designated historic and cultural resources ❑ Proposed Site Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(C)). ❑ The proposed development site, including boundaries, dimensions, and gross area; ❑ Existing site features, including trees, identified on the site analysis map, if any, which are proposed to be retained, removed, or modified by the proposed development; ❑ The location and dimensions of all existing and proposed structures, utilities, pavement, and other improvements on the site and adjacent to the site for a distance of 150 feet; ❑ Setback dimensions for all existing and proposed buildings; ❑ Loading and service areas for waste disposal, loading, and delivery; and ❑ Outdoor recreation spaces, common areas, plazas, outdoor seating, street furniture, and similar improvements ❑ Utility and Improvement Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(D)). The application must include a utility and improvement plant that shows: ❑ The name and location of all existing and proposed public and private streets within or on the boundary of the proposed development site including the right-of-way and paving dimensions, and the ownership and maintenance status; ❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, streetlights, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities; ❑ The location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails; ❑ The location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and communications connections including cable, internet, and television cable, etc.; ❑ The proposed connection points of the proposed utilities; and ❑ The location and size of existing and proposed easement and public dedications ❑ Landscape Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(E)). ❑ Existing and proposed building and pavement outlines; ❑ The location and dimensions of existing and proposed terraces, retaining walls, decks, patios, shelters, and play areas; ❑ Existing and proposed abutting street right-of-way landscaping; ❑ Screening as specified in SDC 4.4.110; ❑ Plantings, either existing or proposed, used in erosion control and stormwater treatment facilities; ❑ Details of a permanent irrigation system, unless specifically exempted as specified in SDC 4.4.100; ❑ Street trees as specified in SDC 4.2.140; ❑ A specifications list for all landscaping materials to be used; ❑ A planting schedule containing the location, size, and species of the existing and proposed plant materials (at time of planting); ❑ The anticipated size of all proposed plants at two years, or at maturity, whichever is first; and ❑ A description of planting methods as specified in SDC 4.4. 100 ❑ Access, Circulation, Parking, and Lighting Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(F)). ❑ The location, dimensions and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, landscaped areas, wheel bumpers, directional signs and striping; ❑ The location and dimensions of all site circulation for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles including entrances and exits to the site, and loading and service areas; ❑ Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways and driveways proposed to be closed; ❑ On-site lighting including the location, orientation, and maximum height of all proposed exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached. ❑ For lighting, the type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and the type of illumination, the wattage, luminous area, and a photometric test report for each light source; ❑ The location, type, number, and dimensions of all bicycle parking spaces; ❑ The amount of gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use; ❑ The location of off-street loading areas; ❑ Existing and proposed transit facilities; ❑ A copy of a Right-of-way Approach Permit application, where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility; and ❑ A Traffic Impact Study prepared by an Oregon Licensed Traffic Engineer when required by and as specified in SDC 4.2.105(A)(4). ❑ Grading, Paving, and Stormwater Management Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(G)). ❑ Stormwater management system for the entire development area; ❑ The roof drainage patterns and discharge locations; ❑ The pervious and impervious area drainage patterns; ❑ The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainage ways to be retained; and ❑ The existing and proposed elevations, site grades, and contours ❑ Phased Development Plan. The application must include a Phased Development Plan if phasing is proposed. The plan must indicate any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase as specified in SDC 5.17.115. Phasing must progress in a sequence that promotes street connectivity between the various phases and accommodates other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The Approval Authority may require the applicant to enter into an agreement for phased developments, and may require bonding or other assurances for improvements, in accordance with SDC 5.15.135, Bonding and Assurances for Development. ❑ Narrative. The application must include a written letter, narrative, or report documenting how the proposal is in compliance with the applicable approval criteria contained in SDC 5.17.125, Site Plan Review Approval Standards. ❑ Deed Restrictions. The application must submit copies of all existing and proposed restrictions or covenants. ❑ Additional Information. The Director may require an applicant to submit additional information at the time of Site Plan Review application submittal. At the applicant's expense, additional studies, reports, or exhibits prepared by qualified professionals may be required to address specific site features or concerns to demonstrate compliance with approval standards. Additional information may include, but is not limited to the following items: Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved; A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Oregon -licensed engineer, if the required Site Assessment specified in SDC 5.17.120 indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. ❑ Septic Systems. If the properties are not served by the City sewer system in accordance with SDC 4.3.105, the application must include documentation from the Department of Environmental Quality or its agent that indicates that the proposed development will be in compliance with all applicable requirements for sanitary septic systems when such systems exist on the properties affected by the development. IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1.210: The following information may be submitted or may be required to be submitted for the applicant to demonstrate compliance with the applicable approval standards. ❑ Preliminary Title Report. A Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 90 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ❑ Traffic Impact Study. A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. ❑ Multiple Unit Housing Standards. Materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 4.7.360, Multiple Unit Housing Standards (if applicable). ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report. Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW. ❑ Geotechnical Report. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high-water table, or if required by the City Engineer. ❑ Overlay District. Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives. ❑ Additional Information. Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. ❑ Tree Felling Permit. If five or more qualifying trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19.100. ❑ Wetland Delineation. A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Department of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property. ❑ Federal or State Permits. The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Land and Drainage Alteration Permit (LDAP). Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development in accordance with Springfield Municipal Code 6.416. 10 ❑ Discretionary Use or Variance. Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 must be provided. ❑ Annexation. An Annexation application must be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7.100, where a development is proposed outside of the City limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer. 11 NEW STORAGE ADDITION FOR ROSEN SUNVISOR SYSTEMS In accordance with the Site Plan Review—Type 2 (SPR) submittal requirements, this written statement and the enclosed attachments describe the proposed development and demonstrate that the proposal complies with the relevant SPR criteria under Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.17-125 and the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed -Use Plan District criteria of SDC 3.4-270 and SDC 3.4.275, and is consistent with the goals of the 2014 Glenwood Refinement Plan. Project Information: Rosen Sunvisor Systems (Rosen) engineers and manufactures a complete array of custom sun attenuation systems for aircraft, military, marine, and other vehicles. Rosen employs approximately 32 people and has been in operation at their current location since 1985. Rosen plans to expand their facility by adding a storage area to the northwest corner of their existing building. The proposed building expansion is approximately 2800 S.F. in size. Uses that will occur in the proposed storage area will be limited to storage of equipment and materials. A recent 12,735 S. F. facility expansion was completed in 2019 under a Type III Site Review Process (Case 811-18-000208-TYP2). Site Information: The subject site is located at 4884 Franklin Boulevard and consists of two adjoining tax lots (TL 2000 and 2001) comprising approximately 1.77 acres. The property contains an existing 37,009 S. F. light manufacturing facility with parking lot and driving aisles, outdoor storage compound, truck loading docks and site landscaping. Tax lots 2000 and 2001 are zoned Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed -Use Plan District. The site abuts Light -Medium Industrial zoned property to the east and Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed -Use Plan District zoned property to north, west, and south. Mobile home park property to the north contains residential structures but is zoned the same as the subject property, Employment Mixed Use. The site lies within Zone X5, Areas of 500 year flood, areas of 100 -year flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile, and areas protected by levees from 100 -year flood, as mapped on FIRM map number 41039C1142F. Soil type on the site is 97 -Newberg -Urban land complex. The site is not located within a Time of Travel Zone for SUB wellhead protection. August 16, 2023 Page 1 of 7 Approval Criteria: Springfield Development Code 5.17-115 Criteria (A) The Director must approve, approve with conditions, or deny a proposed Site Plan Review application based on the following standards: (1) The proposed land use is a permitted use oris allowed as a discretionary use in the land use district. The current land use is light manufacturing which is a permitted use in the zoning district Glenwood River -Front Employment Mixed -Use Plan District as codified in SDC 3.4.245 (B)(4). The current zoning district for this site is Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed -Use Plan District. No change in use is proposed by this expansion project. (1) If a use is allowed as a discretionary use, in addition to meeting the standards below, a Discretionary Use application must be approved in conformance with the standards in SDC 5.9.100. The use is not a discretionary use, therefore this requirement is not applicable. (3) The proposal complies with the standards of the land use district of the subject property; The subject property lies within the Glenwood Riverfront Employment Mixed -Use Plan District, SDC 3.4.200. The proposal complies with the public and private development standards in SDC 3.4.270 and the building design standards in SDC 3.4-275; SDC 3.4-270 A. Public Streets, Alleys and Sidewalks: No new streets and/or alleys are planned on-site, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Sidewalks already exist along the Nugget Way frontage in conformance with the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (SEDSPM). Sidewalks do not exist along the McVay Highway frontage, but it is anticipated that they will be included in the design of the City's round -about project in this area. B. Street Trees and Curbside Planter Strips: No new streets and/or alleys are planned on-site, therefore this requirement is not applicable. C. Lighting: Private on-site lighting will comply with the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, and will be attached to the exterior of the new building addition. Lighting will be the minimum level required for effective illumination of the on-site parking areas, and will include shielding to contain glare and reflection within the boundaries of the property. Proposed lighting is shown on Sheet U1. D. Bicycle Facilities: The site is not part of the multiuse path, therefore this requirement is not applicable. E. Multiuse Path: Site is not part of the multiuse path, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 2 of 7 August 16, 2023 F. Private Property Landscape Standards: Landscaping is in compliance with the general landscaping standards of L3, and includes protection of existing vegetation. G. Vehicle/Bicycle Parking and Loading Standards: There is sufficient vehicle parking space provided on the site. Vehicle parking spaces will not be increased and are below the maximum allowed in Table 3.4.1. With the proposed 2,800 S.F. building addition the total facility building floor area will be 37,099 S.F. and require four bicycle parking spaces per Table 3.4-2. On-site bicycle parking requirements were addressed with the previous site review process. Three long- term bicycle spaces were provided inside the building. One short-term bicycle hoop was provided outside on the west side of the building. H. Wastewater Facilities and Services: No public wastewater facilities or change to existing wastewater facilities are proposed, therefore this requirement is not applicable. I. Stormwater Facilities and Services: No public stormwater facilities are available. Existing private stormwater facilities are designed as Low Impact Development (LID) per the GRP and to Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. J. Public Park and Open Space Facilities: No public park or open space facilities are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. K Location of Transit Stations: Existing bus transit stations are located 600 feet to the north and 190 feet to the south along Franklin Boulevard. L Signs: No additional signage is proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. SDC 3.4-275 A. General: The building and site are designed per Section 3.4-275 with any exception noted below. Any design exception noted provides an alternative means of meeting the intent of the code. The building is located in Subarea D of the Glenwood Refinement Plan. A restrictive covenant on the property limits the exterior construction, but allows the use of pre -painted metal siding with a masonry wainscot extending from grade level at least 48 -inches above grade. B. Design Team: A civil engineer is part of the design team. C. Building Facade: Due to the covenant restriction on the property, the previous addition project chose to use tilt -up concrete construction where articulation in the vertical and horizontal is very limited. The previous building addition met the intent of this code section by incorporating variation in the building facade by providing a different texture (aesthetic stone outline) along portions of the tilt -up concrete panels. The mezzanine (upper story) utilized a feature strip that mimics windows below. The new addition will be a steel building with ribbed metal panel siding ROSEN SUNVISOR, SffE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 3 of 7 August 16, 2023 and a lower 48 -inch split face CMU wainscot. Similar features will be incorporated in the new construction to match those used in the previous addition. D. Height: The existing building height varies from 20'-0" to 25-7". The new addition will have a maximum building height of 23'-6". E. Massing/Building Articulation: To eliminate the appearance of flat blank walls, the following elements are part of the design; repeating window patterns and trim. F. Windows and Doors: Per this section, Subarea D, Light Manufacturing windows and doors shall comprise a minimum of 40 percent of the length and 25 percent of the wall area of the buildings first floor facades to allow views into lobbies and work areas and allow persons inside to look out. Rosen produces products under government contracts that require secrecy and concealment from the public. For this reason, Rosen is seeking an exception from SDC 3.4- 275.F.l.d.i. High windows will be provided along the south facing wall that meet the 40 percent length and 25 percent area of the code. G. Orientation: There is no change to the main entrances to the existing building. An existing entrance at the rear loading dock will remain. Vehicle access doors and man doors will be provided on the south and west sides of the new addition. H. Build -to Lines and Maximum Building Setback: The existing building already meets the required building setbacks. The new building addition will not encroach in the required building setback. I. Pedestrian Amenities: Building canopies are provided along the east portion of the building and lighting along the building wall to meet the intent of this code. Pedestrian amenities along the Nugget Way frontage were included in the previous expansion project. Those amenities included 6 benches, 6 trash receptacles, and 9 pedestrian scale wall mounted lights. Installation of those improvements was deferred until the vacant lot to the south is developed and occupied to discourage vandalism. The City has now indicated that installation of these improvements can be deferred until the City completes design and construction of the proposed roundabout at the Franklin/Nugget Way intersection. J. Screening Mechanical Equipment: New mechanical ventilation equipment will be placed on the rooftop of the addition and screened by a parapet wall so as not to be seen from adjacent public streets. K Parking Structure Design Standards: No parking structures are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SRE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 4 of 7 August 16, 2023 (4) The proposal complies with any applicable approved master plan, master facilities plan, refinement plan, and/or special planned district. The subject property lies within the McVay Riverfront area identified in the 2014 Glenwood Refinement Plan. The existing use as manufacturing is consistent with the current zoning and provisions of the adopted Refinement Plan. (5) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.1, Infrastructure Standards- Transportation. 4.2. 105 Public Streets: No new public streets and/or alleys are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.110 Private Streets: No new private streets are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.120 Site Access and Driveway Standards: Existing driveways are shown on the Existing Conditions Sheet C1.0. No new driveways are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.125 Intersections: No new intersections are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.130 Vision Clearance Area: Existing vision clearance areas are shown on the Site Plan Sheet C2.0. and will be maintained in accordance with this code. 4.2.135 Sidewalks: No new sidewalks are proposed with this project. Sidewalks already exist along the Nugget Way frontage in conformance with the SEDSPM. Sidewalks do not exist along the McVay Highway frontage, but it is anticipated that they will be included in the design of the City's round- about project in this area. 4.2.140 Street Trees: No new street trees are proposed with this project. Street tree requirements along the Nugget Way frontage were addressed during the previous site review. 4.2.145 Lighting Standards: No public street lighting is proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Private on-site lighting is addressed in SDC 4.5.100. 4.2.150 Multi-Use Paths: No multi-use paths are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.2.160 Accessways: No accessways are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 5 of August 16, 2023 (6) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.3, Infrastructure Standards- utilities. 4.3.105 Sanitary Sewer: No new public sanitary sewers are proposed with this project. A private sanitary sewer will be extended to serve new floor drains in the proposed addition. The floor drains will be hydraulicly isolated to exclude stormwater. 4.3.110 Stormwater Management: No new stormwater management systems are proposed with this project. The area of impervious surface will remain unchanged. After reviewing the project, City of Springfield Development and Public Works representatives determined that the proposed changes did not warrant the completion of a Stormwater Scoping Sheet and therefore no Stormwater Management System Study would be required. An existing stormwater catchbasin located within the footprint of the proposed addition will be removed and the paved area in the vicinity will be regraded to direct runoff to the existing stormwater treatment area at the southwest corner of the existing building. Runoff from the new addition roof area will be directed to a pipe on the north side of the building that connects to an existing storm drain pipe that serves the existing building roof drains. 4.3.115 Water quality Protection: The subject site is not in a riparian area along a Water quality Limited Watercourse, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.117 Natural Resource Protection Areas: The subject site is not within a Natural Resource Protection Area, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.120 Utility Provider Coordination: No new utility connections are proposed with this development, all existing utility extensions will be extended from the existing building to serve the new addition. An existing natural gas line at the northwest corner of the addition will require relocation by the utility provider. The developer will coordinate with the utility provider for this work. 4.3.125 Underground Placement of Utilities: No new overhead or above ground utilities are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.127 Electrical Service: No new electrical services are proposed with this project. There is adequate capacity in the existing electrical service to serve the new addition. 4.3.130 Water Service and Fire Protection: Water service is currently provided to the existing building and will be extended to serve the new addition. No new fire hydrants are required to provide fire protection for the building addition. Existing fire hydrants are shown on the Existing Conditions Sheet No public street lighting is proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Private on-site lighting is addressed in SDC 4.5.100. 4.3.135 Major Electrical Power Transmission Lines: No major electrical power transmission lines are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. 4.3.140 Public Easements: No new public easements are required or proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 6 of 7 August 16, 2023 4.3.145 Wireless Telecommunications Systems (WTS) Facilities: No new WTS facilities are proposed with this project, therefore this requirement is not applicable. (7) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.4, Landscaping, Screening, and Fence Standards. 4.4.105 Landscaping: No new landscaping is proposed with this project. Landscaping requirements in setback areas were addressed in the previous site review. All existing landscaping will be retained and protected during construction. 4.4.110 Screening: Vegetative screening is currently provided along the north property line where the site abuts a residential use. No additional items that require screening are proposed with this project. 4.2.115 Fences: The site is currently fenced around the perimeter with 6-foot high chain link fence with access gates at the driveways. No changes to existing fencing are proposed with this project. (8) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.5, On-Site Lighting Standards. 4.5.110 Lighting Standards: New exterior wall mounted light fixtures are proposed on the south and west side of the building addition as shown on Sheet U1. The proposed on-site lighting is shielded to contain glare and reflection within the property boundaries and is the minimum illumination necessary in compliance with the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America. (9) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.6, Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading, and Bicycle Parking Standards. Motor vehicle parking, loading and bicycle parking standards are addressed in 3.4.270 (G) above and currently meet the requirements of this code. (10) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.7, Specific Development Standards. Specific development standards for the Glenwood River-Front Employment Mixed-Use Plan District are found in SDC 3.4.200 and addressed in Subsection (3) above. (11) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.8, Temporary Use Standards. (6443) No temporary uses are proposed with this development, therefore this requirement is not applicable. Conclusion: Based on the information provided and findings contained in this written statement and associated plan set, the proposed building addition for Rosen Sunvisor Systems meets the Site Plan Review criteria contained in the Springfield Development Code. Therefore, the applicant requests that the City of Springfield approve the proposal. If you have any questions about this written statement or associated plan set, please contact Jimi Witt at (541) 338-9488 x1006 or email at: jimi@jbe.us.com. ROSEN SUNVISOR, SITE PIAN REVIEW WRITTEN STATEMENT Page 7 of 7 August 16, 2023 oo�o®v comomo comom© p4 NewSWCNre 1 9 e .. .. .. .. .� .. .. .. .. .. .. .. u .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..i� 3�< � G N c� z _ F x a LI1 oo�o®v comomo comom© DESCRIPTION The patented Lumark Croastour- LED Wall Pack Series of luminaries provides an architectural style with super bright, energy efficient LEDs. The low -profile, rugged die-cast aluminum construction, universal back box, stainless steel hardware along with a sealed and Basketed optical compartment make the Cros.tour impervious to contaminants. The Crosstour wall luminaire is ideal for wall/surface, inverted mount for facade/canopy illumination, pospbollard, site lighting, floodlight and low level pathway illumination iooludick, stairs. Typical applications include building entrances, multi -use facilities, apartment buildings, institutions, .chool., stairway. and loading docks teat. Construction Slim, low -profile LED design with rugged one-piece, die-cast aluminum Is Wed removable door and back box. Matching housing styles incorporate both a small and medium design. The small housing is available in 12W, 18W and 26W. The medium housing is available in the 38W model. Patented secure lock hinge feature allows for safe and fo dy tool -lee. electrical connections with the supplied push -in connectors. Back box includes three half-inch, NPT [hounded conduit entry points. The universal back box supports both the small and medium forms and mounts to standard 3-1/2' to 4" round and octagonal, 4' square, single Back, and masonry junction boxes. Key hole gasket allows for adaptation to junction box or wall. External fin design extracts heat from the fixture surface. One- piece silicone gasket seals door and back box. Minimum 5" wide pole for site lighting application. Not recommended for car wash applications. IDW B 5/8" 183mm Optical Silicone sealed optical LED chamber incorporates a custom engineered mirrored anodized reflector providing high -efficiency illumination. Optical assembly includes impaet-resistant tempered glass and meets IESNA requirements for full cutoff compliance. Available in seven lumen packages; NOOK, 4000K and NOOK CCT. Electrical LED driver is mounted to the die-cast lousing for optimal heat sinking. LED thermal management system incorporates both conduction and natural convection to transfer heat rapidly away from the LED source. 12W, 18W, 26W and 38W series operate in -0 Cto 40-C I4D°F to 104-Fj. High ambient 50-C models available. Croastour luminaires maintain greater than 89% of initial light output after 72,000 hours of operation. Three half-inch NPTthreaded conduit entry pointe allow for thru-branch wiring. Back box is an authorized Lumark electrical wiring compartment. Integral LED electronic driver is Standard 0-10V dimmiW. 120-07V 50/6OHz or 34W 6OHz models. Finish Cro..tour is protected with a Super durable TG IC carbon bronze or au credit white polyester powder coat paint Super durable TGIC powder coat paint lint Shea withstand extreme climate conditions while providing optimal color and gloss retention of the installed life. Options to meet Buy American and other domestic preference requirements. Warranty Five-year warranty. ESCUTCHEON PLATES M', 1sy/, a u [171 3N^ m Seco in s' Denman]to• Jmml O L 111c, [44omml 0 XTOR CROSSTOUR LED APPLICATIONS: WALL/SURFACE POST / BOLLARD LOW LEVEL FLOODLIGHT INVERTED SITE LIGHTING 0(]DLC jai BAA I CERTIFICATION DATA Dark Sky Appo N FIxut mount, Full kdf,eM3xQy FC omyt U VcK W et Lommo Lin d LM79/ LMN Compliant WHS Compliant ADACompliand NOM Compli a tit Morels Omereaea IPQPlatemol Hates Tale 24 Complont TECHNICAL DATA 4 YC Maximum Ambient Tempmomle External Supply Wiring ar-C Minimum EPA EXMiva RojecRtl Area Sq. F.l: XT0m%XT0R2B,XT0RIB-034 XTOB4B-0 05 SHIPPING DATA: Ap Was mm Nat WNpM: 33-5.251M.H3-2AVdj v� COOPER —40,3EN Lighting solution:—letlgnllgbngrg December,.,=11W7 PM oece2 XTOB CHOSSTOUH LED POWER AND LUMENS BY FIXTURE MODEL LEOInMametlOn XT0R1B MOR16W XTORIB-Y MADE XT0R2B-W XT0R2B-Y XTOMB XTOR=-W XTOBiB-Y XTOBEB XTOMB-W XTOMB-Y , L,mena Oel it tp16 113% 1,327 2,135 2,103 1,997 2,751 2,]10U76 50'0 4,259 4,2%319% XTOMB Model Well ma -t E 2SC a85% 2M,00) M'C a88% 21;000 SPC a87% 196100) XTOMB Model 2SC oellee,M Lumana mom M'C a8]% 1%,000 SPC a87% 1114,00) IWIMRootl 11005 990 940 1,495 1'.2 11399 21099 2,068 11965 31159 3,121 ;965 AWEYO, IUD' B.U.O. Re.n9 B1-U0.00 B1 -VO -60 B1 -VO -60 B1 -VO -60 B1 -UO -60 131-U0.60 B1 -UO -60 B1 -UO -60 B1 -UO -60 BbUO-GO BbUO-GO B2 -UO -GO CCTIBMNnl 5100) 4,000 31000 5,000 4,000 31000 51000 4,000 3,000 51000 4,000 31000 CRI ICOIo, RmdMn9lndexj JO JO JO 70 70 JO 70 70 70 70 70 70 Powe, (Wonaomodon 120) 121 121 111 111 11 260) 260) 260) 11 3BW 11 enel A -BW[ T..,=. TM3 Wmp MEI.=. p2,000 Home) 1XEPMEU L]0 HOmel XTOBiBMotlM 120V 2SC a90% 255,00) z -,a05% 20. 234,400 50'0 >OB% 215,0)0 XTOR2B Model 04WA 2SC 0.11A 0.17A M'C >OB% 212,0)0 50'0 a87% 196,00) XTOMB Model 04M 2SC a85% 2M,00) M'C a88% 21;000 SPC a87% 196100) XTOMB Model 2SC a85% mom M'C a8]% 1%,000 SPC a87% 1114,00) CURRENT DRAW 10) 3 M 75 0 10 20 0 Bwnmo Wella) V0149e XTORIB MOtle1IN.. MOR2B I XTOR2B I XTOR6B 120V 0.103A 0.15E 0.22A O.S. 20. 04WA 04. 0.13A 0.17A 2,40V 04WA OABA 0.11A 0.17A 2]]V 0.046A 0.07A 0.1M 0.15A 34]V 0439A 04M 0.082,4 0.12,4 M W W 70 63 % 100 SPC — 40T — nT — Gvme, msaM�e (n COOPER mBe„4,20,5:27PM 4�„yE,yE y,pgq,e 1,X,40,3EN page 3 ORDERING INFORMATION Sample Number : XTOR211 W WT-PCt XTOB CROSSTOUR LED BeB«r LED KNvh Color XOYYng Color OpH«i A3tl ne sudyl AO«saoriea Drtler Separately)' XTDRiB=Smell DOM, 12W Wil« Bright White Ml«M=Carbon Bronze ECUPBMOCOnV01120V° wO/XTOR=Wire Fumtl° XTORID=Small DOOC IOW Stendrurg, SWOR Samulan) MC PhotOz ntml 20&277V!• XTORED-RNC Knuckle It too, Uhl Kit° XTDRiB=Small Door 26W W=NmutmIWme,4000K wT=Summlt White 3.1= JV° XTORHD-TRN=Trunn or Floodlight Kit° XTORaB=MNIum Door Y -Warm White, WROOK BIL-BI«k XA-50°C High Am bent • XTORLE-KN0WBKnckle Floodli0ht Kit. Summit 3OW XTORIB-pCU12W, SOI 120V PC, BT Brone XTOR.-WT18W, 5000K, WBXe° BAAXTORIB=Small DOOq Carbon Bronze AF_Grey SummBWBBe XTDRHD-TIRSW Truman Floodli0ht Kit. Summit 12W, Buy AmerMen Act XTOB+B-w-12W, 401 Carbon Brome OM=Graphite M08111C XTOR.-PzU28W,5000K, WBXe° Compllnnt, DF_Dart Platinum 120V PC, Carbon EVdMXTOR=F$zu48Mn Wall Plate. Carbon Bronze TAFXTORIB=Sma 11 DODO 12W Brome Bronze EWp OR-WBEOCutCMon We 11 Plate, Sum MR White hatle Agre-mr. XTORDIF.PCUIBW,MCOK, XTOR3B-WFCU28WmRSa, XTOB4B-wFCU38W, WEEK, 120V PC, Am Compllnnt' 120V PC, Car- 120V PC,Ce than Carbon Brome BAAXTORM-Small DODO hon Brome ermze 1OW, Buy Ammiran AM XTOB2B-NN-18 W. 5000 K, XTOB2Bd4N-28W.5000K, XTOB4Bd4N-3B W, 5pCO K, CathOn Compllnnt' ceroon Bronze, carom Bronze, Bronze,amv TAFXTOR2B-Sme 11 DODO IPW, my 34JV Tr9ee Agreemema XTOR.-WTFCU18W,5000K, XTOR11216W. 5000K, ACt Compllnnt' 120V PC,Summli 2�-2J JV PC, BAAXTOROB-Small DODO White Carbon BI 28W, Buy American Act Compllnnt' TAFXTOROB-Small DODO 26W, hatle Agre-mr. ActCompllnnt' BAAXTOI M Hlum DODO Ruling, Buy Anumern AM Contained' TAAXTOR IL; M n lum DODO 3OW,TRee AOra mend ActComplain' 1, nan x§w.«mem I'milm..4 n..eBmrorran pma§m.m.m pm anmwm, r rorbwww.e«14an4n§ororore.§u.. 2 amuper m.er.bebni, 4, ORNr P[34 r 9aNmoNlc ItxyT¢i'troM nRevellehle Mb XAenEyNorlIDV eomhlnetlort £W MI IF ft my idt-liiiI nzblu urti4p opry.M eRAlulpae. pone))ane ymhmvl«n redrealImurt MEM EO Ftb1FmunPFFF`Frbaslw mare emb, eaignaIMMOOveearemer-4mptudeewiiney Ouy Amenga Mat +YDI HSI OrumeAgr«me eamr,rayAM of 4AITPA. mpeuiwly. plow rekno wem, itlbrmon intOrmniOn. Wminneatahippee«para§ly CMMIt pen®ly analym]KI-t 0mstic pntennm rpuiremen§. fl Mexmtlx«le«wra§lywlllb«wra§IyemlyroluMereomenlepMerexerequlnmenra.[onwltbMrybrtunxer lnbrmetlon. STOCK ORDERING INFORMATION BPneeBEP«1««x«' +2W 5«I« +ewsen« 28wsen« 3msM. �4}_B1an.. XTOB+B-12W, 601 Carbon Bronze XTOBID-IOW,5000K, Carbon XTO112B-28W, 5000K, Carbon XTOBeB-38W, 5pCOK, Carbon Bronze Bronze Bronze BAA-Bw Amereen XTOBIB-WT-12W, 6000K, Summit white XTOBID-w-10W, wom Car- XTOR3B-w-28W, 4000K, XTO114111 -31W, WEEK, Ca than Bronze Atl hon Bronze Carbon Bronze WA-he4 XTORIB-pCU12W, SOI 120V PC, XTOBID-WILAR6000K,Sum- XTOR.-WT18W, 5000K, XTOB4B-WTd0W, 5000K, Summit White A,mr-ama Act Carbon Bronze mBWh1ce SummBWBBe XTOB+B-w-12W, 401 Carbon Brome XTORDIFFCU1OW,6000a, XTOR.-PzU28W,5000K, XTOB4BFCU30W, WEEK, 120V PC, 120V PC, Carbon 120V PC, Carbon Carbon Brome Brome Bronze XTORDIF.PCUIBW,MCOK, XTOR3B-WFCU28WmRSa, XTOB4B-wFCU38W, WEEK, 120V PC, 120V PC, Car- 120V PC,Ce than Carbon Brome hon Brome ermze XTOB2B-NN-18 W. 5000 K, XTOB2Bd4N-28W.5000K, XTOB4Bd4N-3B W, 5pCO K, CathOn ceroon Bronze, carom Bronze, Bronze,amv my 34JV XTOR.-WTFCU18W,5000K, XTOR11216W. 5000K, 120V PC,Summli 2�-2J JV PC, White Carbon BI t 0n, F.RprW pgzI1RzHO1q an.farm.,.in®tlpn8manormaybemmpliamwiNNe Buy Amerminy anamo1310PAIOrTntle Agnemeee urninuma, A.rspaniwly, plow relerzo xe4i®tOrmOre intOrmaziOn.tOmlgnen§aM1ippa] «pen®ly may 4 «pera4ly analym] untlertlOmasvcprelennm w{uinment. o2OHighery SOOO (,COOPER SM d...B"My Lightfing golufflons -I -. �. December 14, 2g2,5:2JPM OMory, Fn,o ,DS, M,3EN R -Panel Metal Wall Panel System The R -Panel wall is a strong, attractive wall panel ideal for commercial, community, and Industrial applications. This panel delivers what most builders, contractors, and owners have come to expect from us in a versatile and attractive building system. Panel Credentials • ASTM E283 Test Method for Determining Air Leakage Through Wall Systems • ASTM E331 Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Wall Systems • State of Florida Product Approval • UL263 Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials Panel Specifications TOP INCOMPRESSION BOTTOM IN COMPRESSION Gage Thickness (in.) Yield (ksi) Tensile (ksi) Panel Wt. BO) I. lGmssl ling S. IeN.)(in'') M. lkip-in) S. IeN.)lin') M. lkip-in) 26 0.0177 80 82 0.86 0.0490 0.0378 1.3590 0.0462 1.6593 24 0.0222 80 82 1.08 0.0633 0.0543 1.9520 0.0588 2.1133 Panel Capacity (psf) 2660.6E SPAN (ft.) Pressure' $11060111- 3.0 79 72 3.5 1. Section properties were cakulmed in accordance 4.0 4.5 120 5.0 small m checked for bending, shell, combined bending 5.5 L3226 6.0 6.5 90 56 7.0 7.5 4. 246AGE NOTES Prmure' Suction° 1. Section properties were cakulmed in accordance wnh A61 S100ICSA 5136, 3016 Edition. 120 75 2. small m checked for bending, shell, combined bending 103 64 and shell, was crippling, reflection and panel allover. 3. Deflection 6limited to SpanI60. 90 56 4. Parrel pullover limits are based on d'w=O.W.. 80 50 s. Thermal load has not been considered. 69 45 6. cora ies are based on a 3 -span condition with equal length spans. 57 41 7. 'Pressure" load is applied lmvard onthe outer surface towards supports. 48 38 8. 'Suction" load is each ed outward on the inner 41 35 surface away from panel supports. 36 32 31 29 A -Panel Metal Wall Panel System The architectural features of the A -Panel wall make It Idea l for fascias and decorative wall designs. The recessed fasteners provide a clean exterior appearance, and the deep rib configuration creates an attractive shadow pattern. Fasteners for are semi -concealed. AANW Panel Credentials ASTM E283 Test Method for Determining Air Leakage Through Wall Systems ASTM F331 Test Method for Water Penetration of Fxtenor Wall Systems State of Florida Product Approval UL263 Fre Tests of Building Construction and Materials ASTM C1363-11 Test Method for Thermal Performance of Building Materials and Envelope Assemblies by Means of a Hot Box Apparatus Panel Specifications 75 102 64 89 56 72 50 59 45 35 35 TOP INCOMPRESSION BOTTOM IN COMPRESSION Gage Thickness (in.) Yield lks'7 Tensile lksi) Panel Wt. 1psf) I. (Grossl (in') S. eeN.)(inr) M.(fil n) S. eeN.)(inr) M.(fil n) 26 0.0177 80 82 0.86 0.0320 0.0417 1.500 0.0367 1.3167 24 0.0222 80 82 1.08 0.0400 0.0537 1.9267 0.0493 1.7700 SPAN (ft.) 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 Panel Capacity Ipsf) 2660.6E r Pressure' Subron. 78 72 67 62 56 54 - 52 48 43 43 2460.6E Pressure' Suctions' 119 75 102 64 89 56 72 50 59 45 36 40 48 41 30 34 41 38 26 29 35 35 22 25 30 32 9 22 26 28 MOTES 1. Section properties were calculated in accordance wnb A61 S1001CSA 5136, 3016 Edition. 2. Panels were checked for bending, sbeaq combined bantling and swap web crippling, reflection and panel pulbver. 3. Defection's limited to Spenl60. 4. Panel pullover limits are based on d'w=0.W.. 5. Thean al l cad has not been const dered. 6. Capacities are based on a 3 span condition whir equal length spans. 7. 'Pressure" load is applied toward onthe outer surface towards supports. 8. 'Suction' baa is appll ea outward on the inner surface away from panel supports. Reverse R -Panel Metal Wall Panel System The Reverse R -Panel wall Is a strong, attractive wall panel ideal for multiple applications. The panels offer a rigid surface designed to compress up to 460W 6" of insulation without causing unsightly bulges at the girt. Fasteners are semi -concealed, allowing attention to focus on the beauty of the wall. Panel Credentials ASTM E283 Test Method for Determining Air Leakage Through Wall Systems ASTM E331 Test Method for Water Penetration of Extenor Wall Systems State of Florida Product Approval Miami -Dade County Notice of Acceptance (NOA) UL263 Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials ASTM C1363-11 Test Method for Thermal Performance of Building Matenals and Envelope Assemblies by Means of a Hot Box Apparatus Panel Specifications TOP IN COMPRESSION BOTTOM IN COMPRESSION Gage Thickness(in.) field(ksll Tensile (W) Panel Wt.(psf) I•(Gressl(iny S•(l(W) M.(kip4n) S- (l Tri M- (kip -in) 26 0.0177 80 82 0.86 0.0477 0.0445 1.5993 0.0356 1.2800 24 0.0222 80 82 1.08 0.0600 0.0566 2.0333 0.0491 1.7667 Panel Capacity do) 26 GAGE 2461 SPAN (fl.) Pressure' Suction. Pressure Suctions' 3.0 79 72 120 75 3.5 67 62 103 64 4.0 90 56 4.5 71 50 5.0 58 45 5.5 48 41 6.0 F2936 40 38 6.5 35 35 7.0 30 32 7.5 26 30 NOTES 1. Section properties werecakulmed in accordance with A61 S101/CSA 5136, 2016 Edition. 2. Parals were checked for bending, shear combined bending and she&, web Crippling, deflection and panel pulbver. 3. Deflection's limited to Span/60. 4. Panal pullover limits are based on d'w=0.W.. s. Thermal load has not been considered. 6. Caiammes are based on a 3 span condition with equal length spans. 7. 'Pressure" load is applied lmvard on the outer surface cowards supports. 8. Suction^ bad is applied outward on the inner surface away from panel supports. PVDF Cool Coatings PVDF utilizes a two -coat system featuring fade resistant color, incredible durability, and environmentally -friendly "cool' technology. Regal White' lead Gray •• Slate Gray' Cypress Green ik . IR.72 SRI 88 Reflective Whhe'• IR.63 SRI 76 Warm White• I Desert Send '• IR.57 SRI 67 Surrey Beige• IR.37 SRI 40 Royal Blue IR.30 SRI 30 Terra Cotta• IR.31 SRI 31 Dark Brume• Charcoal '• IR .32 SRI 34 Midnight Black •' -Non Stock Color: &tended man! hill may apply. *The GaNalume coming process Is likely to result 'n noticeabl¢ shade variations GelvalumeIs also subject to variable mothering and may agoalto h. W use Tor rejMiOn.'ENED0 STAIR Qua Ihad Color. All standard PJDF colors havea 35yvr finish v Coating Technology. The term 'TW on the Ordar Document refers to "To Be wanted' rare sande, IR.63 SRI 76 IR .50 SRI 56 IR.36 SRI 38 IR.32 SRI 33 Brite Red •' IR.38 SRI 40 e�'prr33v Ti �1e IR.27 SRI 26 Galvalume" IR .77 SRI 72 e (aze, number, and reflect on) from coil to mil white may result uetoweathering cbaraRxitiics. Theeesbadevar'ationsare not closely a pprosimateadue I coating colors. These colors utilize Cool non this ads ft. Please note that PVDF as slight upcharg ewer SP PVDF Cool Coatings Product Specifications Solar Reflectance, Thermal Emittance and Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) Solar Reflectance To be considered "cool," products most have a Solar Reflectance of at Ieasl.25. Solar Reflectance is the fraction of the total solar energy that is reflected away from a surface. Thermal Emittance Thermal Emittance is the measure of a panel's ability to release heat that it has absorbed. Sala Reflectance Index (SRI) Put Solar Reflectance and Thermal Eraittance together and you get the Solar Reflectance Index (SRI). SRI is calculated by using the values of solar reflectance, thermal Ran man ce and a medium wind coefficient. The higher the SRI value, the lower its surface temperature and consequently, the heat gain into the building. Metal roofs coated with pigmented PVDF resin achieve an SRI of 26-88, depending on the color. Conventional roof surfaces have low reflectance (0.05 to 0.25) and high thermal emittance (typically over .85). Roof panels with both high reflectance and high emittance can reduce the surface temperature by as much as 30-50% based on color and geographic location, which will result in a reduced heat gain to the building, therefore reducing the energy demand. GALVALURA sorEgivWwf Oct &d 8i MIem01mol mc, ontlmmeolim lkeraetlpWuce2 Pi COOL PANEL COLORS PVDF Cool Color Initial Solar Reflectance RR) Initial Thermal Emani Solar Reflectance Ind. SRI Regal WM1lte J2 OR5 as Reflective White .63 DES 76 Warm White .63 0.86 76 Pearl Gr .47 0.86 54 oeeed Sand .57 0.86 67 Surrey Berne .50 0.85 56 SWe Gm .37 0.85 40 (Blue .30 0.85 30 Tema Cotta .36 0.85 38 Cypress Green .31 0.85 31 Dark Bounce .32 0.86 33 Brite Red .38 0.84 40 Charcoal .32 0.86 34 Mdni MBlock .P] 0.85 26 Galealunhi .n 0.06 T2 PVDF COOL TECHNICAL INFORMATION Tot TeMMNIg11a Performance Ory Film Thickness ASTM 01400 0.15-0.30 mil primer 0]0-0.90 mil topcoat GRx, ASTM 0523@60° 25-35 Solar Reflectance ASTM E903 >25% Initial Steep Slope: >15%after 3 years Low Slope: >65% Initial >50% after 3 years Emissivity ASTM CDA, 0.80180%1 min. ASTM E408 Pencil Hardness ASTM 03363 F-211 Flexibility T -Berl, ASTM 04145 0-3T-BenQ NO pick df Adhesion ASTM 03359 NoatlMsionloss Reserve Impact ASTM D2 Ant Nocracking orachesion loss Abrasion, Falling Sand ASTM 0968 65-85IImil Mortar Resistance ASTM C267 Noeffect Detergem Resistance ASTM 03348 NO Effect 3% detergent @ 100°F p2 hm.l Acid Resistance ASTM01308 Noeffect 10%murutic.0-24 him Noeffect 20%sulfuric .0 -18 h6. Apq Rain Test Kesternich$02, DIN 50018 15 cycles min. NO Objectionable coorchance Alkali Resistance ASTM 01308 Noeffect 10%, 25%Na0H,1 for. Saft Spray Resistance ASTM B117 NOR Or few YB blisters; 5%salt fog @95°F Max. average 1l8" Scribe creep Passes 1000 him Humidity Resistance ASTM O]14, Pasees 1500 him. ASTM 02247 NO YB talsos 100% relative hi midity@95°F Exterior Exposure ASTM 02244, Max.5 fade ASTM 04214 Max. B chalk 10 ym. @ 45°F, South Florid SP Cool Coatings I If it; Tool silicone -polyester paint system utilizes a two -coat system that offers superior quality and durability. Polar White' IR.67 SRI 81 Sandstone' Sagebrush Tan • IR.51 SRI 59 Brick Red • Forest Green IR.27 SRI 25 Burnished Slate' IR.59 SRI 69 Fox Grny IR.38 SRI 40 Aztec Blue IR.32 SRI 32 Gal"Iurni -Non stock Color: Wended Iand flmas may apply.*The Bell Iume chatng proms is likelyt0 you ltIn variances In spangle lAh9, number, and reflect on) from Ito mil which may result in u noticeablesha]evariations. Galvalume Is also subject tovariableweathering and mayappear to have different stores due towNlM1ering characteristics. These shade variations are not sefor rejecti0n.'ENERGY STARe Qualified Color.All SP colors moves 25 year finish warranty. Colors shared coselyapprOeposteaaual Coating colors. These colors utilize Cool Coating Technology. The term -TBS' on the Order Document raters to 'To Be Selected' from standard SP colors as shown On this chart. IR.51 SRI 58 IR.27SRI 26 IR .77 SRI 72 SP Cool Coatings Product Specifications Solar Reflectance, Thermal Emittance and Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) SolarReNectonce To be considered "cool," products most have a Solar Reflectance of at least .25. Solar Reflectance is the fraction of the total solar energy that is reflected away from a surface. ThermalEmittance Thermal Emittance is the measure of a panel's ability to release heat that it has absorbed. Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) Put Solar Reflectance and Thermal Emittance together and you get the Solar Reflectance Index (SRI). SRI is calculated by using the values of solar reflectance, thermal emittance and a medium wind coefficient. The higher the SRI value, the lower its surface temperature and consequently, the heat gain into the building. Metal roofs coated with SP Cool Coatings achieve an SRI of 25-81, depending on the color. Conventional roof surfaces have low reflectance (0.05 to 0.25) and high thermal emittance (typically over .85). Roof panels with both high reflectance and high emittance can reduce the surface temperature by as much as 30-50% based on color and geographic location, which will result in a reduced heat gain to the building, therefore reducing the energy demand. GALVALUMA iSO /Egi9ettd([ptlempM1 OfMC knemotwal M[, ontl IDmeot its&MSEdp[otlu[e5 SP COOL PANEL COLORS Se CoolColor Initial Solar eefltttan[e(I Initial Thermal Email SolarRMMance Imlexpuff Polar White .67 0.83 81 Sandstone .59 0.84 69 Fox Gra .51 0.85 5B Saffebrusliffm .51 0.85 59 Brick Red .36 0.85 40 Aztec Blue .27 0.85 26 ForeitGmen .27 DIDI 25 Bann6healSlate .32 0.85 32 GaNaWma .n 0.0B 72 SP COOL TECHNICAL INFORMATION Test Test Neal Pertormante any Film Thickness ASTM Drops 0.15 030milprimer 0.70 0.90 mil topcoat Glass /STM 0523@60° 10-80+ Solar Reflectance /STM E903, 015(25%) min. /STM E1918 Using portable mfleclometer Emissivity ASTM CDA, 0.80(8094 min. ASTM E408 Pencil Hardens /STM 03363 IF min. Flexibiltly T -Bend, ASTM 04145 2T-beM, No pick OH Adhesion /STM 03359 1.5 x metal thickness, No arthe5lan 1055 Reverse Impact /STM 02794 2xgage or 80 lbs. Abrasion, Falling Sand /STM 0968 25-4a Vmil Mortar Resistance /STM C267 No effect Detergent Resoiance /STM 02248 No effect 3% detergent @ 100-F (72 his.l Acid Resistance ASTM 01306 No effect 10%murlatic acial-15 min. No effect 20%suffuric acid - 24 hrs. Acid Rain Test Resternich S02, DIN 50018 10 cycles mi n. No objectionable wlorchange Alkali Resistance /STM 01308 No effect 10%,20%1,00H,1 bi. Soft Spray Resistance ASTM B117 Passes 1000 his. 5% salt fog @95°F Humidhy Resistance /STM 0714, Passes 1000 his. /STM 02247 No blislers, crack50r peeling 100% relative Initially 95-F Egerlar&posure /STM 02244, Max.5 fade /STM 04214 Max.8chalk 10 ym. @ 45°F, South Florida