Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication Applicant 8/3/2023City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Land Division Tentative Plan Partition, Subdivision IEPgINOPI� Application Type (Applicant., check ne❑ •❑ Partition Tentative Pre -Submittal: ❑ Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal: Partition Tentative Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Submittal: Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Applicant Name: Chad Saunders Phone: 541-729-3486 Company: j Fax: Address: '1j !;U p✓ e -14,,4o Applicant's Rep.: Anthony J. Favreau Phone: 541-683-7048 Company: The Favreau Group Fax: Address: 3750 Norwich Ave., Eugene, OR 97408 Propertyy Owner: Same as applicant Phone: Company: Fax: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-31-24 TAX LOT NOS : 11800 Property Address: 475 35th St. Size of Property: 20666 Acres ❑ Square Feet Proposed Name of Subdivision: Partition Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: 3 -Lot Partition Existing Use: Single Family Residence # of Lots/Parcels: 3 Total acreage of parcels/ allowable density: 0.47 acres proposed # Dwell units3 Si natures: Please sign and Drint your name and date in thea Required Project Information (City Zntake Staff., II -23- Dw l rD-wc- Associated Applications: II -23' 0 ro riate box on the next na e. complete this section) si ns: Pre -Sub Case NO.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: I ' 3' fes- Date: (' Reviewed b xlf'✓� ApplicationlFee: Technical Fee: $ Postage Fee: $203 pT �r TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: V -.4-3-00C) IS Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10 Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowle a that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelings, informatio uests and requirements conveyed to my representative. I represent this application to be performed on this application at necessary for processing the apl contained within the submittal, z submitted. This statement seryl Print Date: rr submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check mittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as rovided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise may begin processing the application with the Information as notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a Date: Revised 1/7/14 kl 2 of 10 Land Division Tentative Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Land Division Tentative Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 160 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/7/14 kl 3 of 10 Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. ❑ Land Division Tentative Application Form ❑ Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. Density - list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. ❑ Copy of the Deed ❑ Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ❑ Copy of the Land Division Plan Reduced to 81/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. ❑ Right -of -Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. ❑ Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. ❑ Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. ❑ Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets: ❑ All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. ❑ All plan sets must be folded to 61/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions ❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Revised 1/7/14 kl 4 of 10 ❑ Vicinity Map ❑ The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use and required setbacks from proposed property lines. ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision ❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department ❑ Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 '/3 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings ❑ Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table b. Land Division Tentative Plan ❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor ❑ City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division ❑ Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division ❑ Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale ❑ Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and area of illumination ❑ Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division. Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map. ❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities ❑ Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways ❑ Location of existing and proposed transit facilities ❑ Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails ❑ Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip Revised 1/7/14 kl 5 of 10 ❑ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points ❑ The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated ❑ Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as specified in SDC 5.12-120 E. c. Stormwater Management Plan ❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer ❑ Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system ❑ Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations ❑ Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns ❑ The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained ❑ Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) ❑ Amount of proposed cut and fill ❑ Additional Materials That May be Required IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: ❑ Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement ❑ Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230 ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present ❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district ❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property ❑ Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Revised 1/7/14 kl 6 of 10 ❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 ❑ An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer ❑ All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing Revised 1/7/14 kl 7 of 10 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX. 541.736.1021 www.spnngfield-orgov December 6, 2013 REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY: In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stonnwater scoping sheet," provided to help engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of decisions. As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process. Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet, which reflects changes requested by the development community. PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS U 17 rrrrr 31b4LCeI91 ri7 V,P"IN N:1 1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location. 2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study. (Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.) 3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Attu: Clayton McEachem. 4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete stormwater study. 5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study. Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter) as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: httv://www.springfield- or.gov/DPW/EnginmringmdConstructionResources.htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Forms section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process. Sincerely, Clayton McEachern, PE City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Email: cmeeachem@springfieldor.gov Phone: (541) 736 —1036 Fax: (541) 736-1021 DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS SPRINGFIELD 225 FIFTH STREET OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX: 541.726.1021 www.spdrygfiald­or.gov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK ----------- — (Area below this b'sefdled out by Applicant) __— (Please return to Clayton MEachern @ City ofSprtngiiield Development and Public Works, Fan # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036), enwd:cnae�lern@sprirtglleldor.gov Project Name: Applicant: Assessors Parcel #: Date: Land Use(s): Phone #: Project Size (Acres): Fax #: Approx. Impervious Area: Email: Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: (Area below this line /'died outby the City andReturned m the Aaabeand (At a nurumuan, all boxes checked by the City on the front and backoftlus sheet shall be subnutted or on application to be coaWletefor subnuttal, afthough other requirements n be recess Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, UH may be substituted for Rational Method) ❑ Small Site Study—(use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: ❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Wedand/Riparian: ❑ Soil Type: Downstream Analysis: ❑ N/A ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: ❑ Hillside Development: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: ❑ Other Jurisdictions Return to Clayton McEachem @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@springfeAd-or,gov, FAX., (541) 736-1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS r Baredupon the tnfor nation provided on tie front ofdds sheet, the follou>ing represents a ndndnnou of uvh w it merkdfor on application to be complete for subnddal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu ofde Sprirgtield Development Cork (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design A3mma1. Connpltance with these requirements does not constitute site appromol, Adebooml site specific information nary be required Note: Upon scoping sheet subndttal, ensure completedfornu has been signed in the spare provickel below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3 Req'd N/A ❑ ❑ All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e. g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration media) for stonmvater quality. Additionally, aminimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. ❑ ❑ Where required, vegetative stommwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormrmer Management Manual. ❑ ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the Eugene Stomrmvater Management Manual (Sec2A.1). ❑ ❑ If a stormrmer treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stomrmvater Management Manual. ❑ Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. ❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set ❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to Other/Miscethmeous ❑ Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site ❑ A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. drains. ❑ Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year stoma event and overflow effects of a 25 -year stoma event Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review ofDownstream System EDSPM Section 4.03A.0 ❑ A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). ❑ ❑ Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. ❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set ❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to Other/Miscethmeous ❑ Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. ❑ Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to another. ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03A A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to thewebsite: him/Avww.deo.state.or.ushvo/uic/uic.htm for more infomuation. ❑ Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events. *Thisform simU be inchukd m nn Nhuhmen5 inside the frontcover, ofthe stormnsder shady. * IAWORTANT..- ENGINEER PLEASE READ BEEOWAND SIGN' As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stommater study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015 SAUNDERS TENTATIVE MAP NARRATIVE May 25, 2023 Assessor's Map: 17-02-31-24 Tax Lot 11800 Applicants: Chad Saunders (541) 729-3486 Applicant's Representative: The Favreau Group 3750 Norwich Ave. Eugene, OR 97408 541-683-7048 Attn: Tony Favreau LAND USE REQUEST The applicant proposes to divide the subject 0.47 acre property to create 3 lots and to provide all necessary infrastructure to support the development. The proposed residential use and density (6-14 dwelling units/acre) are consistent with the existing Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning and the City's standards for development in the LDR zoning district, where a maximum of 14 dwelling units/acre is permitted and the proposed is 7.7 units per acre. The proposal does not include any improvements to 35" Street. SITE AND SURROUNDING CHARACTERISTICS The site is within an established Springfield residential neighborhood. The property is located at 475 35" St. and has an existing home situated towards the front of the property. The Northern, Southern and Eastern property lines abut fully developed parcels with existing homes. The site soils are 2226A- Awbrig Urban Land Complex, soil group D. 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that all applicable criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to a public agency, the Director may waive any approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future development application. A. The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel size and dimensions. Response: The proposed lots meet the 4,500 sq. ft. minimum lot size and the 50 -foot street frontage requirements for the north -south streets established by SDC. Parcel 1 is 6,563 s.f. with 74.00' of frontage. Parcel 2 is 7,036 s.f. panhandle with a 20' access easement. Parcel 3 is 7,067 s.f. panhandle with a 20' access easement. B. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Response: The property is zoned Low Density Residential (LDR). The Metro Plan diagram for the subject property is LDR. C. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Response: a. Water: The proposed development is within the Springfield city limits and will receive water service from the Springfield Utility Board (SUB). There is an existing 8" waterline in 35th St. b. Wastewater: There are 2 existing 8" wastewater systems. One in 35'" St. and one along the east property line. c. Stone Drain: There is an existing storm drain along the southerly property line. d. Streets: 35th Street is fully built and no improvements are proposed. D. The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. Response: See Response to part C. E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WOLW Map and their associated riparian areas; other riparian areas and wetlands specified in Section 4.3-117; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-7605 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. Response: The Metro Area General Plan, Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map, State Designated Wetlands Map, Hydric Soils Map, Wellhead Protection Zone Map, FEMA Maps, and the list of Historic landmark sites have been consulted and with the exception noted below, there are no features needing to be protected or preserved on this site. If any artifacts are found during construction, there are state laws that could apply; ORS 97.740, ORS 358.905, ORS 390.235. If human remains are discovered during construction, it is a Class "C" felony to proceed under ORS 97.740. The site is relatively level and drains to the north. The driveway will drain to an inlet and then to a treatment planter as shown. The required treatment area per the City of Eugene Stormwater Surface Filtration/infiltration Facility Sizing Spreadsheet form is 180 s.f. and 180 s.f is provided. This facility will drain to the existing storm drain along the southern property line. The houses on parcels 2 & 3 will have individual treatment facilities on each parcel that will overflow to the existing storm drain via a drainage easement on parcel 2. Criterion 6 is met. Physical features, including but not limited to significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the WOLW Map and their associated riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings, and historic features are not present on the site. F. Parking areas and ingress -egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. Response: 35th Street is fully built and no improvements are proposed. G. Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished as specified in this Code. Response: There is no other adjoining property under the same ownership that can be developed. H. Adjacent land can be developed or Is provided access that will allow its development as specified in this Code. Response: There is no undeveloped land adjoining the property. Approval of the proposed subdivision will not impede development of adjacent land. I. Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the City's urbanizable area and no concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards specified below shall also apply. Response: This does not apply Stormwater Surface FiltrationAnfiltration Facility Sizing Spreadsheet 24 Hour Storm, NRCS Type 1 A Rainfall Distribution City of Eugene Name: Saunders Date: 6/27/2023 Address: 47535th St Permit Number: Permit Flood Control Sorirrofield. OR Rio Cutlet Catchment ID: clrhr rr: Anthony J. Fsvhmu TY: The Firmest, Group Complete this form for each drainage catchment in the project site that is to be sized per the Presumptive Approach. Provide a distinctive Catchment ID for each facility coordinated with the site basin map to correlate the appropriate calculations with the facility. The maximum drainage catchment to be modeled per the Presumptive Approach is 1 acre (43,560 SF) =or infiltration facilities in Class A or B soils where no infiltration testing has been pedromed use an infiltration rate of 0.5 in/hr. For all facilities use a maximum soil infiltration rate of 2.5 in/hr for lommi/growing medium. loose'Ym' from the dmpdown loxes below next to the design standards requirements for this facility. Pollution Reduction (PR)Yes Flow Control (FC)l No Destination(DT) No 'Ani11hationkciiiry nnuA1x Arxeenae Netaciiiryh,em novtdvsmotion rsqulremeMe Total Square Footage Impervious Area=sgfl Total Square Footage Pervious Area- 0 scfl Mae ea CN= 98 Pervious Area CN=l 85 Total Square Footage of Drainage Area= 2958 sfl Time of Concentration Post Development= OS min Weighted Average CN=l 98 Pre�Development CN= 85 Time of Concentration Pre�Development= 10 min Tested Soil Infiltration Rate= 0.5 iNhr(Soo We 4) Destination Design=®iNhr Design Soil Infiltration Rate= 0.5 in/hr Soil Infiltration Rate R uirement Rainfall De h Desi nStorm Stoma P011otlonleVuIlon 1.4inches Water Flow Control 3.6 inches Flood Control Destination I 3.6 inches Flood Control Facility Facility Side Slop( Max. Ponding Depth in Stormwater Facility - Depth of Growing Medium (So 6/27/2023-7:38 AM Facility Surface Facility Surface Perri Facility Bottom Facility Bottom Perri Ratio of Facility Area to Basin Vc Pollution Reduction-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rate to Stormwater Facility = 0.023 cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rate= 0.000 cfs Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater Facility 291 cf Total Overflow Volume= 0 cf Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 8.6 in Drawdown Time= 1?2 hours Yes Facility Sizing Meets Pollution Reduction Standards? VES Meets Requirementoi No Facility Flooding? VES Meets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Flow Control-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rate to Stormwater Facility = 0.064 cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rate= 0.011 cfs Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater Facility= 828 cf Total Overflow Volume= 296 cf Peak Off -Site Flow Rate Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 23.9 in Filtration Facility Underdrain= 0.002 cfs Drawdown Time= 47.7 hours Pr w,lmmnent Runoff Data Peak Flow Rate = O.IXtS cfs Total Runoff Volume =1 519 cf =Facility Sizing Meets Flow Control Standards? Nw Meets Requirement for Post Development offsite flow less or equal to Pre-Development Flow? ZI NW Meets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Destination-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rate to Stormwater Facility = N/A cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rate= N/A cfs Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater Facility= N/A cf Total Overflow Volume= N/A cf Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility- N/A in Drawdown Time= N/A lours N/A Facility Sizing Meets Destination Standards? N/A Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? L.2LAJMftts Requirement for Maximum of 30 hour Drawdown Time? 6/2]/2023-]:38 AM Lane County Clerk 2023-011407 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Lane County Deeds & Records FideG Nati Tid8 3pages 04/28/202309x27:25 AM •,r � ori RPR-DEED 000 St n=8 CASHIER 12 $1s oo $11 00 $tnoo s61 00 $97.00 3007 North Delta Hwy., Ste 206 Eugene, OR 97408 GRANTOR'S NAME: Robert C. Eckerson GRANTEE'S NAME: Wonderwall Ventures LLC, an Oregon limited liability company r AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Order No.: 60222301563-KB Wondenvall Ventures LLC, an Oregon limited liability company PO Box 1553 1 Eugene, OR 97440 SEND TAX STATEMENTS TO: Wondenwall Ventures LLC, an Oregon limited liability company O PO Box 1553 Eugene, OR 97440 Sk APN: 0120632 Map: 17-02-31-24.11800 475 35th Street, Springfield, OR 97478 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Robert C. Eckerson, Grantor, conveys and warrants to Wonderwall Ventures LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Grantee, the following described real property, free and clear of encumbrances except as specifically set forth below, situated in the County of Lane, State of Oregon: Beginning at a point 281 feet South of the Northeast corner of Block 1, PACKER SUBDIVISION, as platted and recorded in Book 11, Page 25, Lane County Oregon Plat Records, in Lane County, Oregon; running thence West parallel with the North line of said Block 1 a distance of 279.3 feet; thence South parallel with the East line of Block 1 a distance of 74 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of Block 1 a distance of 279.3 feet; thence North along the East line of Block 1 a distance of 74 feet to the Point of Beginning, in Lane County, Oregon. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion, if any, lying within the limits of 35th Street. THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS THREE HUNDRED THIRTY THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($330,000.00). (See ORS 93.030). Subject to; SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTERS, OREGON LAWS 2010. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. Deed (SLI WaaeMy) Legal ORD1368doc/Updated: N26.19 Pagel STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED (continued) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this document on the date(s) set forth below. Oat :Q4-'Lo�_z62� e Robert C. Eckerson State of () I `--� County of Ill. f) This ins ant was acknowledged before me onb r�}-�i I�� - by Robert C. Eckerson. N ub is - State Oregon My Commission Expirere s: 7-]4OFFICIALST """nE ANN S 00MIMPAR� TARY PUBLIC-REGON MMISSION NO.1012209A ON EXPIRES MY 10, 025 Deed (Statutory Warranty) Legal DR01368.dool Updated: 04.26.19 Pepe2 OR-FT-FE000152047000 OM301563 EXHIBIT "A" Exceptions Subject to: 1. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: The City of Springfield, a municipal corporation, in Lane County, Oregon Purpose: as stated in said easement Recording Date: March 14,1963 Recording No: 3049 and Recording Date: March 14, 1963 Recording No: 3050 and Recording Date: March 14, 1963 Recording No: 3051 Affects: Easterly 14 feet as described in said easement 2. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: The City of Springfield, a municipal corporation, in Lane County, Oregon Purpose: as stated in said easement Recording Date: October 5, 1967 Recording No: 608 Affects: Southerly 7 feet as described in said easement 3. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: The City of Springfield, a municipal corporation, in Lane County, Oregon Purpose: as stated in said easement Recording Date: August 17, 1979 Recording No: 7949411 Affects: Westerly 5 feet as described in said easement 4. Possible encroachments as set forth on the surveyors report dated April 17, 2023 by Jeremy A. Sharer, Professional Land Surveyor. There's a possible fence encroachment on the East line of the subject property that would be better detailed in a complete land survey being attained. This Company will require an indemnification from both the seller and the buyer to remove this exception to the final title policy. Deed (statutory wxnamr) Legal ORD1368.docl Updated: 06.26.19 Page OR-FT-FEUG-01520470003-60222301563 �e WONDERWALL VENTURES LLC ATTN: CHAD SAUNDERS 475 35TH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 STATUS OF RECORD TITLE REPORT Date: JULY 03, 2023 Our No: CT -0340163 Your No: -- Charge: $300.00 As requested, Cascade Title Co. has searched our tract indices as to the following described real property: ( A T T A C H E D and as of: JUNE 23, 2023 at 8:00 A.M., we find the following: Vestee: WONDERWALL VENTURES LLC, an Oregon limited liability company Said property is subject to the following on record matters: 1. Property taxes in an undetermined amount, which are a lien but not yet payable, including any assessments collected with taxes to be levied for the fiscal year 2023-2024. 2. City liens, if any, as levied by the City of Springfield for which no search was made. 3. Public utility easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted the City of Springfield, by instruments recorded March 14, 1963, Reception No. 1963- 003049, Reception No. 1963-003050, and Reception No. 1963-003051, Lane County Official Records. 4. Storm sewer easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted the City of Springfield, by instrument recorded October 5, 1967, Reception No. 1967-000608, Lane County Official Records. 5. Public utility easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted the City of Springfield, by instrument recorded August 17, 1979, Reception No. 1979- 049411, Lane County Official Records. 6. Possible encroachments as set forth in surveyors report dated April 17, 2023, by Jeremy A. Sherer, PLS, as disclosed in Warranty Deed recorded April 20, 2023, Reception No. 2023-011407, Lane County Deeds and Records. MAW OFHCE FLORENCE OFFICE VILLAGE PLAEA OFFICE 811W LAMETTESM 915 HWY 101' FLORENCE OREGON 97439 47M VE,LAGE PLAZA LOOP SUITE 100 EUGENE, OREGON 97401 MAU.ING: PO BOX 508' FLORENCE OREGON 97439 EUGENE OREGON 97401 PH: (541) 689-2233 * FAX: (541)185-0309 PH: (541) 99]341] * FAX: (541)9978246 PH: (541) 653-8622 * FAX: (541) 8444626 Order No. 0340163 Page 2 7. Deed of Trust, including the terms and provisions thereof, executed by Wonderwall Ventures LLC, Grantor, to David L. Jacobson, Trustee, for the benefit of Chase Development LLC, Beneficiary, dated April 28, 2023, recorded April 28, 2023, Reception No. 2023-011408, Lane County Deeds and Records, to secure payment of a note in the amount of $260,000.00. NOTE: The property address as shown on the Assessor's Roll is: 475 35th Street Springfield, OR 97478 NOTE: Taxes, Account No. 0120632, Assessor's Map No. 17 02 31 2 4, 411800, Code 19-00, 2022-2023, in the amount of $2,021.30, PAID IN FULL. This report is to be utilized for information only. This report is not to be used as a basis for transferring, encumbering or foreclosing the real property described. The liability of Cascade Title Co. is limited to the addressee and shall not exceed the premium paid hereunder. CASCADE TITLE CO., by: rmh/rh: Title Officer: KURT BEATY Order No. 0340163 Page 3 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Beginning at a point 281 feet South of the Northeast corner of Block 1, PACKER SUBDIVISION, as platted and recorded in Book 11, Page 25, Lane County Oregon Plat Records, in Lane County, Oregon; running thence West parallel with the North line of said Block 1, a distance of 279.3 feet; thence South parallel with the East line of Block 1, a distance of 74 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of Block 1, distance of 279.3 feet; thence North along the East line of Block 1, a distance of 74 feet, to the point of beginning, in Lane County, Oregon.