Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMeeting Packet Planner 7/28/2023Completeness Check Meeting Development and Public Works Department Conference Room 616 & Zoom COMPLETENESS CHECK MEETING DATE: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. DPW Conference Room 616 and Zoom Completeness Check Mtg (Partition Tentative) #811 -23 -000167 -PRE 811-23-000169-PROJ Aster-Kjessler LLC Assessor's Map: 17-02-34-44 TL: 90001 Address: S. 67� Street and Aster Street Existing Use: residential - condominiums Applicant has submitted proposal for 2 -lot partition Planner: Andy Limbird Meeting: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 11:00 — 12:00 via Zoom and Conference Rm 616 ,112Pm. - A, Alk 4.0r �+ 4f N SITE VICINITY MAP 811 -23 -000167 -PRE Completeness Check Meeting 17-02-34-44 TL 90001 S.67 1h Street & Aster Street Aster-KjesslerLLC City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Land Division Tentative Plan Partition, Subdivision SPRINGFIELD w 0#/ PApplication Type (Applicant: check ne artition Tentative Pre -Submittal: x Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal: I❑ Partition Tentative Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Submittal: Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section) Applicant Name: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: 3450 Walton Ln, Eugene, OR 97408 Applicant's Rep.: Jed TruettAICP Phone: (541)302-9830 Company: Metro Planning,Inc Fax: Address: 846AStneetSpf1d,0Rq7477 Property Owner: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: 345oWaKon Ln Eugene, OR974oB ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-34-44 TAX LOT NOS : g000l Property Address: Size of Property: 1.01 Acres x❑ Square Feet ❑ Proposed Name of Subdivision: N/A Description of if you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: 2-10t partition Existing Use: 100+cis1r condominium dwellings and ara es # of Lots/Parcels: 2 Total acreage of parcels/ allowabledena' 1.0116'14 Proposed # No development is Dwell Units proposed wthisa Si natures: Please si nand rint our name and date in the appropriate Required Project Information (City Intake Staff. Associated Applications: box on the next a e. complete this section) Signs: Pre -Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $ TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10 MEMORANDUM Date: 07/26/2023 To: City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 From: Katie Keidel, Associate Planner Metro Planning, Inc. 846 A Street Springfield, OR 97477 (541)302-9830 kkuidel@metropt=ing.com metroplanning.com RE: Aster-Kjessler LLC Tentative Plan Partition Assessor's Map & Tax Lot 17-02-34-44-90001 The following attachments are included with this memo: • Land Division Tentative Application Form • Written Narrative • Preliminary Title Report • Current Deed (No. 2022-040226) • RL1D Detailed Property Report • A&T Tax Lot Record • A&T Tax Map; A&T Supplemental Tae Map No. 1 • Aster Condominiums Plat • Land Division Plan, reduced to 8.5x11 • Four (4) Tentative Partition Plan—Existing Conditions • Four (4) Tentative Partition Plan Proposed • CD — electronic copy of attachments 846 A STREET SPRINGFIELD. OREGON 974T 1541)302-9830 W W WMETROPLANNINGXOM TENTATIVE PARTITION PLAN FOR ASTER-KJESSLER LLC Submittal No. 3 Document Date: July 26, 2023 Applicant's Request: Approval of Type II Tentative Partition Plan for Replat of "Parcel B" of Aster Condominiums Plat (3g8o) Property Owner/Applicant: Aster-Kjessler LLC 3450 Walton Ln Eugene, OR 974o8 Applicant's Representative/ Metro Planning, Inc. Planner/Project Coordinator: Katie Keidel, Associate Planner 846 A Street Springfield, OR 97477 (543) 302-9830 Surveyor: EGR & Associates 2535 Prairie Rd Eugene, OR 97402 (543) 688-8322 Civil Engineer. A & O Engineering 38o O Street, Suite zoo Springfield, OR 97477 (543) 302-9790 Subject property: Assesssw's Map Number 37-02-34-44 Tax Lot g0003 Site Address/ Location: N/A Total Property Size: 3.o3+/- acres Zoning/ Designation: R-3/LDR Size Proposed Parcel z: 5,335 sf Size Proposed Parcel z: 38,682 sf Background This proposal pertains to Assessor's Map and Tax Lot 17-02-34-44-9000i, an approximately i.oi-acre lot located inside the Springfield city limits, on Aster Street near S 67`^ Street ("subject property"). The subject property is"Parcel B" of the ig8o Aster Condominiums Plat. It is zoned City of Springfield R -i which maintains density standards of a minimum of six (6) and a maximum of fourteen (14) dwelling units per net acre. The proposed land division will create two (2) new lots – Lot i is proposed at 5,135 square feet and Lot 2 is proposed at 36,682 square feet. No development is proposed as apart of this Tentative Partition plan and the parent parcel meets density requirements as there are ten (1o) existing dwelling units situated among the 1.o1 -acre subject property. This written statement intends to demonstrate the proposal's compliance with all criteria and standards for Land Divisions under SDC 5.12-115 Tentative Plan –General; SDC 5.12-12o Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements; and SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria. The Springfield Development Code (SDC) sections are indicated by bold and/or italic typeface; applicant responses follow in plain typeface. 5.12.115 Tentative Plan—General. Anyresidendal land division shall conform to the following standards: (A) The lot7parcel dimensions shall conform to the minimum standards of this code. When lots7parcels are more than double the minimum area permitted by the zoning district, the Director shall require that these lots7parcels be arranged. (s) To allowredivision; and (2) To allowfor the extension of streets to servefuture lots/parcels. (3) Placement of structures on the larger lots/parcels shall be subject to approval by the Director upon a determination that the potential maximum density of the larger lot/parcel is not impaired. In order to make this determination, the Director mayrequire a Future Development Plan as specified in SDC S.12.12o(E). Response: The subject property is zoned R-1 which maintains a 3,000 sq ft minimum lot size. Lot 1 is proposed at 5,135 sf; Lot 2 is proposed at 38,682 sf. Neither proposed lot exceeds double the minimum size allowed. This criterion is met. (B) Double frontage lots/parcels shall be avoided, unless necessaryto prevent access to residential development from collector and arterial streets or to overcome specific topographic situations. Response: SDC currently maintains no R-1 minimum frontage requirements. (C) Panhandle lots7parcels shall comply with the standards specified in SDC 3 2.21c and 4.2.120(A). In the case of multiple panhandles in Partitions, construction ofnecessaryudlides toserve all approved panhandle lots7parcels shall occur prior to recording the Plat. Response: This tentative partition plan proposes no panhandle lots/ parcels. (D) Public street standards as specified in SDC 4.2.10 . Response: No public streets are included or proposed in this tentative partition. S.12.12o Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements A Tentative Plan application shall contain the elements necessaryto demonstrate that the provisions of this code are being fulfilled. EXCEPTION. In the case of Partition applications with the sole intent to donate land to a public agency, the Director, during the Application Completeness Check Meeting, may waive any submittal requirements that can be addressed as part of afuture development application. (A) General Requirements (s) The Tentative Plan, including anyrequiredFuture Development Plan, shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Professional Land Surveyor on standard sheets of 18 inches X24 inches. The services of an Oregon Licensed Professional Engineermay also be required by the Cityin order to resolve utilityissues (especiallystormwater management, street design and transportation issues), and site constraint and/or water qualityissues. Response: The Tentative Partition Plan has been prepared by Ryan Erickson, PLS of EGR & Associates, Inc., an Oregon Licensed Professional Land Surveyor, and is included with this submittal on standard sheets of 18"x zq". (z) The scale of the Tentative Plan shall be appropriate to the area involved and the amount of detail and data, normallys inch = So feet, s inch = loofeet, or s inch = 2oo feet. Response: A scale of 1`30'is used on the Tentative Plans. (3) A north arrow and the date the Tentative Plan was prepared. Response: A north arrow and date of plan preparation are included on the Tentative Partition Plans included with this application. (y) The name and address of the owner, applicant, if different, and the Land Surveyor and/or Engineer who prepared the Partition Tentative Plan. Response: Owner/Applicant is Aster-Kjessler LLC. Surveyor who prepared the proposed Tentative Partition Plan is Ryan Erickson, of EGR & Associates, an Oregon Professional Licensed Surveyor. (S) A drawing of the boundaries of the entire area owned by the partitioner or subdivider of which the proposed land division is a part. Response: On the Tentative Partition Plan, a thicker black line is drawn around the subject property to easily show the boundaries of the subject property. (6) City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and anyspecial service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way, which cross or abut the proposed land division. Response: There are no special service district boundaries, city boundaries, or railroad rights-of-way that cross or abut the proposed Partition. (7) Applicable zoning districts and the Metro Plan designation of the proposed land division and of properties within loo feet of the boundary of the subject property. Response: The subject property is zoned City of Springfield R -i and designated Low Density Residential on the Metro Plan. All adjacent properties are also zoned R -i. (8) The dimensions (in feet) and size (eitherin squarefeet or acres) of each lotiparcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site, where applicable, and the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale. Response: Dimensions and sizes for each proposed lot are indicated in square feet and/or acres on the attached Tentative Partition plans. (g) The location, outline to scale and present use of all existing structures to remain on the property after platting and theirrequired setbacks from the proposed new propertylines. Response: There are ten (io) platted condominium lots (each with an associated tax lot number) with attached garages existing within tax lot g000i, but not included as apart of tax lot g000i. Technically, no structures are existing on the subject property, "Parcel B" of the Aster Condominiums Plat. (zo) The location and size of existing and proposed utilities and necessary easements and dedications on and adjacent to the site, including, but not limited to, sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Response: All utilities are existing and connection points will be addressed at time of final partition plat. (zz) The locations, widths and purpose of all existing or proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division; the location of anyexisting or proposed reserve strips. Response: The locations of any existing public and private utility easements are shown are the Tentative Partition plan; no easements are proposed. (zz) The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearlyindicated. Response: The property owner is proposing Lot z remain dedicated open space. (B) A Site Assessment of the Entire Development Area. The Site Assessment shall he prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer and drawn to scale with existing contours at 1 -foot intervals and percent of slope that precisely maps and delineates the areas described below. Proposed modifications to physical features shall he clearly indicated. The Director may waive portions of this requirement if there is a finding that the proposed development will not have an adverse impact on physical features or water quality, either on the site or adjacent to the site. Information required for adjacent properties may be generalized to show the connections to physical features. A Site Assessment shall contain the following information. Response: No site assessment is necessary as there is no development proposed. (z) The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WOLW) Map on file in the Development and Public Works Department; Response: There are no watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses Map that encumber the subject property. (z) The loo-yearfloodplain andfloodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision; Response: According to FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 41039C=661, the subject site is located in Zone X, an area determined to be outside of the Soo -year floodplain. (3) The Time of Travel Zones, as specfed in SDC 3.3.20 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development and Public Works Department; Response: According to the Wellhead Protection Map, the subject property fal Is outside the Time of Travel Zone for wellhead protection. (y) Physical features including, but not limited to significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the WOLW Map and their riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings; Response: There are no significant physical features such as clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands, or rock outcroppings located within the boundaries of the subject property. (S) Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; and Response: The USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey indicates that the soil types covering the subject property consist of sixty-three percent (63%) ioSA— Pen gra Silt Loam and thirty-seven (37°x) 43C— Dixonvil le - Phil omath- Hazelai r Complex. The depth to water table is more than 8o inches for Dixonville soils and o to 30 inches for Pengra soils. (6) Natural resource protection areas as specified in SDC 4.a.zz�. Response: There are no natural resource protection areas present on the subject property. (C) A Stormwater Management Plan drawn to scale with existing contours at s foot intervals and percent of slope that preciselymaps and addresses the information described below. In areas where the percent of slope is zo percent ormore, contoursmay he shown at S foot intervals. This plan shall show the stormwater management system for the entire development area. Unless exempt by the Director, the Cityshall require that an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer prepare the plan. Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect may also be required. The plan shall include the following components: (i) Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations; (z) Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns; (3) The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater qualitymeasurer and natural drainageways to be retained. (y) Existing and proposed she elevations, grades and contours; and (S) A stormwaterstudy and management system plan with supporting calculations and documentation as required in SDC c.g.aao shall he submitted supporting the proposed system. The plan, calculations and documentation shall be consistent with the Engineering Designs Standards and Procedures Manual to allow staff to determine if the proposed stormwater management system will accomplish its purposes. Response: Per advisement from public works staff (Clayton McEachern, PE), no Stormwater Management Plan is required with this proposal. (D) Aresponse to transportation issues complying with the provisions of this code. (z) The locations, condition, e.g.,fullyimproved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, AC mat, "gravel, widths and names of all existing streets, alleys, or other rights-of-way within or adjacent to the proposed land division; Response: The attached Existing Conditions site plan indicates the above as applicable. (z) The locations, widths and names of all proposed streets and other rights-of-way to include the approximate radius of curves and grades. The relationship of all proposed streets to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan or Sprin field Comprehensive Plan, including the Sprin field Transportation System Plan (including the Conceptual Street Map) and, any approved Conceptual Development Plan; Response. No new development, streets or otherwise, is proposed with this Tentative Partition plan. (3) The locations and widths of all existing and proposed sidewalks, multi -use paths, and accessways, including the location, size and type of pl antings and street trees in anyrequired planter strip; Response: The location and widths of existing sidewalks adjacent to the subject property are shown on the Tentative Partition plan. There are no existing multi -use paths, accessways, or planter strips; none are proposed. (S) The location of existing and proposed traffic control devices, fire hydrants, powerpoles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar publicfacilities, where applicable; Response: The above are indicated on the attached Existing Conditions Sheet, where applicable. (S) The location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways demonstrating conformance with lot or parcel dimensions and frontage requirementsfor single-family and duplex lots/parcels established in SDC 3.2.21q and driveway width and separation specifications established in SDCc 2.z2o, where applicable; Response: Location and dimensions of existing driveways are indicated on the attached Existing Conditions site plan. No new driveways are proposed. (6) The location of existing and proposed street trees, associated utilities along street frontage(s), and street lighting: including the type, height and area of illumination; Response: Existing streetlights are Cobra style Low Pressure Sodium lamps and are shown on the tentative partition plan. (7) The location of existing and proposed transit facilities; Response: Closest transit facility is located on the south side of Thurston Rd, east on 681h St. Route 11 -Thurston. (8)A copy of a Right -of -Way Approach Permit application where the propertyhasfmi tage man Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility; and Response: The subject property is not adjacent to an ODOT facility. (g)A Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Oregon Licensed Traffic Engineer, wherenecessary, as specified in SDC4z.zos(A)(rd. Response: A Traffic Impact Study is not necessary as no dwellings are proposed with this tentative partition. (E) AFuture Development Plan. Where phasing and/or lots/parcels that are more than twice the minimum lot/parcel size are proposed, the Tentative Plan shall include a Future Development Plan that: (i) Indicates the proposed redivision, including the boundaries, lot/parcel dimensions and sequencing of each proposed redivision in any residential district, and shall include a plot plan showing building footprintsfor compliance with the minimum residential densities specified in SDC a z.zos; (z) Addresses street connectivity between the various phases of the proposed development based upon compliance with the Springfield Transportation System Plan (including the Conceptual Street Map), the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), applicable Refinement Plans, Plan Districts, Master Plans, or this code; (3) Accommodates other required public improvements, including, but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity; (rd Addresses physiml features, including, but not limited to, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the Water OualityLimited Watercourse Map and their associated riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings and historicfeaturer and (S) Discusses the timing and financial provisions relating to phasing. Response: No Future Development Plan is required. (F) Additional information and/or applications required at the time of Tentative Plan application submittal shall include the following items, where applicable: (z) A brief narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed land division and the existing use of the property; Response: This written statement serves as the narrative describing the proposal in detail. (z) If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required; Response: The applicant, Aster-Kj essl er, LLC, is the property owner. (3) A Vicinity Map drawn to scale showing bus stops, streets, driveways, pedestrian connections,fire hydrants, and other transportationfre access issues within 2Mfeet of the proposed land division and all existing Partitions or Subdivisions immediately adjacent to the proposed land division, Response: A vicinity map is shown on the attached Tentative Partition Plan. (y) How the Tentative Plan addresses the standards of any applicable overlaydistrict; Response: No overlay districts apply to the subject property. (S) How the Tentative Plan addresses Discretionary Use criteria, where applicable Response: The proposed 2- Lot tentative partition within the R -i zone is a permitted use according to SDC 3.2-2io. No Discretionary Use Permit is required. (6) A Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC s-so-sao; Response: No trees will be felled as a result of this Tentative Partition Plan. (7) A Geotechnical Reportfor slopes ofsSpercent orgreater and as specified in SDC3.z.coo. and/or if the required She Assessment in SDC S.iz.izo(B) indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or high water table as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; Response: There are no slopes greater than 15% on this site. Soils are not classified as unstable and water table is not high; a site assessment is not required. (8) An Annexation application as specified in SDC s.7.iao where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within City's urban growth boundary and can be serviced bysanitarysewer; Response: The subject property is within the City of Springfield city limits. (g) A wetland delineation approved by the Department of State Lands shall he submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property; Response: There are no existing wetlands on the subject property. (so) Evidence that anyrequired Federal or State permit has been appliedfor or approved shall be submitted concurrently; Response: No Federal or State permits are required with this tentative Partition application. (ss) All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing; Response: There are no public improvements proposed. The tentative partition is funded with private financing resources. (zz) Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of a Homeowner's Association Agreement, where appropriate; Response: No deed restrictions or Homeowner's Association are proposed at this juncture. (13) Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home parkis proposed, the Director may waive certain submittal requirements specified in subsections (A) through (M). However, the Tentative Plan shall address the applicable standards listed under the park Subdivision approval criteria specified in SDC 5.1].1]5. Response: This application is not proposing the Partition of a manufactured dwelling or mobile home park. 5.12.125 Tentative Plan Criteria. The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that all applicable criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to a public agency, the Director may waive any approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future development application. (A) The request conforms to the provisions of this code pertaining to lotiparcel size and dimensions. Response: The applicant's request to subdivide the subject property's approximately i.oi acres into two (z) lots conforms with all provisions and mandatory minimum development standards for City of Springfield, R -i zoned properties, as specified in SDC 3.2-215. (B) The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Response: The subject property is zoned R -i (Low Density Residential) for the City of Springfield, which is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram. (C) Capacityrequirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwatermanagement facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the she at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this code and other applicable regulations. The Director or a utility provider shall determine capacityissues. Response: No development is proposed; capacity requirements are not an issue. (D) The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this code and other applicable regulations. Response: This proposed z -lot partition complies with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this SDC criteria, and all other applicable regulations. All existing public and private facilities meet the design and construction standards of the SDC. (E) Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil orgeologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WOLW Map and their associated riparian areas; other riparian areas and wetlands specified in SDC 4. g.11 rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological sign fcance, as may be specified in SDC 3.3.goo or ORS 97.740.7(0, 358.905.955 and 390.235.240, shall be protected as specified in this code or in State or Federal law. Response: Physical features as relevant are included on the attached Existing Conditions site plan. (19 Parking areas and ingress -egress points have been designed to. facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standardsfor State highways. Response: No new parking areas or ingress -egress points are proposed. (G) Development ofanyremainder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished as specified in this code. Response: Development of any remainder of the subject property owned by Kjessler-Aster, LLC can be accomplished in compliance with the Springfield Development Code. (H) Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its development as specified in this code. Response: Adjacent land either is, or can be, developed. (1) Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the City's urbanizable area and no concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards specified belowshall also apply. (z) The minimum area for the partitioning of land in the UFaO Overlay District shall be so acres. (2) EXCEPTIONS: (a) Anyproposed new parcel between 5 and 20 acres shall require a Future Development Plan as specified in SDC 5.22.220(E) for ultimate development with urban densities as required in this code. (b) In addition to the standards of subsection (/)(2)(a), above, any proposed new parcel that is less than S acres shall meet s of the following standards. () The property to he partitioned shall he owned or operated by a governmental agency or public utility; or ()) A majority of parcels located within loo feet of the property to be partitioned shall be smaller than 5 acres. (iii) No more than g parcels shall he created from s tract of land while the property remains within the OF -10 Overlay District. EXCEPTION. Land within the OF -10 Overlay District maybe partitioned more than once as long as no proposed parcel is less than S acres in size. Response: The subject property is within the City of Springfield city limits. (J) Where the Partition of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the following approval criteria apply. (1) The park was approved before July 2, 2001 and is in compliance with the standards in SDCa2.2as or other land use regulations in effect at the time the she was approved as a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park; or the park is an approved non -conforming use. In the latter case, a park is in compliance if the City has not issued a notice of noncompliance on or before July 2, 2001. (2) The number of lots proposed shall be the same or less than the number of mobile home spaces previously approved or legally existing in the park. (3) The external boundary or setbacks of the park shall not be changed. (y) The use of lots, as shown on the Tentative Plan, shall be limited to the installation of manufactured dwellings; i.e., 'stick-built"houses are prohibited. (S) Any other area in the Partition other than the proposed lots shall be used as common property, unless park streets have previously been dedicated to the City or there are public utilities in the park. All common property shall be addressed in a Homeowners'Association Agreement. (a) Areas that are used for vehicle circulation (streets), driveways that serve more than 2 lots/parcels or common parking areas, shall be shown in a Tract or easement on the Tentative Plan. (b) All other services and utilities that serve more than s lot shall he in a Tract or easement. Where a service or utility serves only lot, but crosses another, that service or utility shall also he in an easement shown on the Tentative Plan. (c) Existing buildings in the park usedforrecreational, meetings or otherpurposesfor the park residents shall he in a Tract shown on the Tentative Plan. (6) Any public utilities shall be within a public utility easement. (7) If public utilities or services are required to serve the Partition, the park owner shall sign and execute a waiver of the right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district to provide the public utilities or services. (6443) Response: This proposal does not include a manufactured dwelling parklmobile home park; this criterion is not applicable. 10 ASTER C O H®®Y 0 fid 0 U M SMtNtln6=r a aot.e'Ny......x 13' } V• County Surveyor SECTION 34, T. 17 S., R.2 W., W. M. 1.1-i. yar SPRINGFIELD, LANE COUNTY, OREGON 'n " 16 PAPE .' E 255 E. � ---- -NO°06'\V -- NOTE f7 Notary Public -Oregon My C°Tmisuon Eep.na 1-9-51 SURVEYORS CERTI FTCATF.: State of Oregon) SS County of Lane 1 I, Lee C. Plants, Registered Professional Land Surveyor, being first duly sworn on oath say that I have caused to be surveyed and marked by proper monuments the following described Plat: Beginning at the Initial Point which is marked by a 2" x 36" galvanized iron pine driven 6" below the surface of the ground, said Initial Point being North 1126.70 feet and Fast 50.00 feet from the interior ell corner of the Thomas .1. Mavnard Donation Land Clain No. 44, in Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian; thence North 44. 56' 05" hast 21.34 feet to the South margin of McKenzie Highway; thence along said South margin North 99. 52' 30" Fast 60.00 feet; thence leaving said South margin South 125.00 feet; thence North 89. 52' 10" Fast 73.76 feet to the West boundary of South "A" Park, as clotted and recorded in File 72, Slide 38, Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence along said West boundary South 0. 06' 00" East 398.00 feet; thence leaving said West boundary North 89. 52' 30" Fast 160.50 feet; thence South 0° 06' 00" Fast 155.70 feet; thence South 89. 52' .30" West 159.72 feet; thence North 8. 23' 12" West 137.12 feet; thence South 89. 52' 30" W-st 130.50 feet to the Fast margin of South 67th Street; thence along said Fast margin North 528.00 feet to the Initial Point of Reginning, in Lane County, Oregon. - REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL �• Subscribed and sworn to before me[IID SVtIVEYOR th i sR;" d av of �p.�5,�py 1980. 0 EG 1 C. Plan s, P. L „21.ti. �`M�4y�yQ sE rtEeEn x5. 11 11 LEE C. PLANTS 1300 Notary Public Oregon E5 M, cpmmis,iun E.""r 3-�t-82 DECLARATION Know all men that Carl A. Petersen is the owner of the above described property and he does hereby create "Aster", an Oregon Condominium, as shown to be a true and correct man of the land described above and further laid out by him as a condominium and IT, does herebv commit said land to the operation of the unit ownership law as prescribed in Chapter 91 of the Oregon Revised statutes. T� C L A. PETEHt EN ACKNOWLr'D04'.MF VT State of Oregon) 55 County pf Lane 1 Personally aeneared Car] A. Petersen, who is known to me to be the identical ind!vidua] who executed the foregoing instrument and he docs hereby acknowledge said instrnmenr to he his voluntary act and deed. APPROVALS Subscribed and sworn to before mem -� th:s%\'`dav of 1960. 3 - Notary Public Oregon CouiIsesso y rT^-7-- M, eommrrpn E.m�er 3-4-4i County Recorder IIF\I riii t.II ,�� ��'.'0E : AUER CONDOMINIUMS SECTION POSTAL ADDRESS FINISH FL.ELEV• 34, T.17 S., R.2W., W.M. SPRINGFIELD, 2 105 LANE COUNTY, 3 OREGON 0 0 Do i UNITS 1,3,6, UNITS 2,4,5, 9,12 0 13 GARAGES N GARAGES 10, I I A 14 ; L.C.A. L.C.A. P ° 13.00' 13-00' o o 0 23.42' m e °I 23.42' 23.42' 13.00' III 12.42' N H N a UNIT 8' ' UNIT 7 •. UNITS 7 8 8 GARAGE N NGARAGE N L.C.A. L.C.A. 13 00' a o� 23 42' c c of 13.00 12.42 0.29' 0.29' 29 GARAGE a "GARAGE UNITS 15-20 FOR ' FOR M 16,18820 N15,17 a 19N L.C.A. L.C.A. dl 13.00' 12.42' I, Yarvrin S. KruM, ve w .a en 11.11. 'aery�et �.[ nm. iirt a enow. _M Notary Public Oregon My comms„ion t -.°ire, 3 -9 -6T - z 4r- UNITS 7,15,17 O 19 0 UNITS 0,16,18020 9 F �I L ]E DDATE1 .1111 ue911 4 OE/VT �:�_'C> FILE 73 SLIDE3Sc9 SHEET 2 OF 2 UNIT NUMBER POSTAL ADDRESS FINISH FL.ELEV• CEILING ELEV. 1 103 521.37 528.97 2 105 521.41 529.01 3 127 521.16 528.76 4 129 521.16 528.76 5 6704 522.52 530.12 6 6702 522.43 530.03 7 6718 11 531.78 1 539.38 8 6716 522.69 530.29 9 6732 522.59 530.19 10 6730 522.60 530.20 II 6701 525.20 532.80 12 6703 525.07 532.67 13 6739 525.11 532.71 14 6737 525.14 532.74 15 6735 544.41 552.01 16 1 6733 535.68 543.28 17 6731 550.26 557.86 18 6729 541.16 548.76 19 6717 550.26 557.86 20 6715 541.12 548.72 ELEVATIONS CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DATUM AEGI.^+TER ED !�ROFESSIOi1AL LANG SURVEYOR OREGON JJL♦ If. 1978 pARVIN S KRUSH 1643